1. Introduction
Polymer composites are of particular interest to industry. This is due to their specific properties obtained by combining at least two materials with differing characteristics [
1,
2,
3]. Among the advantages of polymer composites, compared to monolithic materials, the most commonly cited are improved corrosion resistance, increased stiffness, and reduced weight [
4,
5]. A significant component of the mixture, making up the largest portion, is the filler, whose introduction into the formulation affects the physicochemical, processing, and functional properties of the resulting composites [
6,
7]. Currently, great importance is placed on the introduction of so-called bio-fillers (renewable or recycled materials) into the mixture, which can fully or partially replace industrially used fillers. This trend has become particularly visible in recent years, marked by an increase in environmental awareness [
8,
9,
10]. It allows for a reduction in the use of plastics or rubber in composite production. The substitution of fossil fuels or non-renewable materials with renewable materials fits into the idea of a circular economy, as well as the sustainable development goals and climate change mitigation objectives set by the United Nations [
1,
2].
In the production of biocomposites, the following raw materials are most commonly used: palm oil waste, flax and hemp fibers, rice husks, kenaf fibers, coconut shells and fibers, as well as dry mass from sugarcane [
9,
11]. Moreover, increasing attention is being paid to commonly occurring and non-demanding herbaceous plants [
12]. Natural origin fillers have many advantages that are important from the perspective of composite production. They are widely available, their acquisition cost is low, and they are suitable for recycling. Furthermore, the properties of these materials positively affect the functional parameters of the product [
13,
14,
15]. Composites containing natural origin materials are environmentally friendly and find applications in various industries, including the construction, automotive, transportation, sports, and packaging production industries [
16].
The development of the biocomposites sector is best reflected by the situation of the global market, with their production and sale having steadily increased. The steadily expanding field of their applications is also noticeable in the forecast. In 2021, the global biocomposites market was worth USD 24.59 billion. It is expected to grow to USD 87.73 billion by 2030, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 16.8 per cent over the forecast period 2022–2030. A large contributor to this is the automotive industry, where the automotive composites market will reach almost USD 16 billion by the end of 2030 [
17].
Fillers should show good adhesion to the polymer matrix and should have a high degree of dispersion. They should not contain crystalline or surface water [
18,
19]. The above-described requirements are met, among others, by dried sage (
Salvia officinalis) and lucerne (
Medicago sativa), which are the subject of the analyses presented in this article. These are widespread herbaceous plants that do not require special cultivation conditions and are therefore characterized by their high availability and low cost. The effect of the addition of sage to the composite was studied by [
20,
21,
22,
23], among others. Słota et al. [
23] developed a ceramic–polymer composite with sage extract for the regeneration of bone tissue. In [
21], the properties of rigid polyurethane foams using sage filler were analyzed. In the first case, satisfactory results were obtained with regard to biocompatibility, biodegradability, and the possibility of the gradual release of active ingredients over time. In the case of polyurethane foam, improvements in performance were recorded at lower proportions of sage fillers.
The aim of this work is to investigate the effects of sage and lucerne fillers on an ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) polymer-based composite. Different proportions of fillers were used in the mixtures, which were subjected to strength tests. Recent advancements have been observed in the development of polymer composites incorporating both biodegradable and non-biodegradable alternatives to conventional fossil-based polymers [
24]. However, the exploration of plant-derived additives for application in polymer-based composite systems remains relatively limited. There is a recognized need for expanded research to evaluate the compatibility and functional properties of polymer mixtures formulated with plant-based fillers [
25].
The plant-derived additives investigated in this study have previously been examined in other research contexts. Członka et al. [
24] utilized sage extract modified with montmorillonite as a bio-additive, demonstrating its potential to reduce the flammability of rigid polyurethane foams. Miedzianowska et al. [
25] assessed the effects of incorporating lucerne into rubber. The plant additive was introduced in multiple forms, including biomass, phyto-ashes, and plant extracts. For the biomass variant, three proportions were employed: 10 PHR, 20 PHR, and 30 PHR. The authors of this study decided to use both types of herbs as bio-additives. Experimental investigations were conducted on polymer-based mixtures containing four different proportions of sage and lucerne: 5 PHR, 10 PHR, 20 PHR, and 30 PHR.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Laboratory tests were carried out using a laboratory mixer for mixtures based on EPDM, ethylene norbornene (ENB), and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). Calcium carbonate with a density of 2.7 g/cm3 and a low moisture content of <1.0% was used as a filler. The plastic-fixing agent was paraffin oil with a density of 0.87 g/cm3 and a kinematic viscosity of 108.1 mm2/s (at 40 °C). The material had a paraffin content of 69%, a naphtha content of 31%, and a sulfur content of 0.002%. The vulcanization activator was zinc oxide, which is used during typical sulfur vulcanization. Vulcanization accelerators are typical for sulfur-curing vulcanization systems. The pigment was iron oxide with RAL 3016, pH = 4–8, and a density of 5.25 g/cm3. The crosslinking agent was sulfur; it was non-oil-based, rhombohedral, light yellow in color, and had a pH of 6.6. The melting point of the agent ranged from 111 to 119 °C and the bulk density was 550–750 kg/m3.
Table 1 presents the components of the control sample, which is rubber without the addition of dried plant materials.
Dried, above-ground parts of sage (
Salvia officinalis) and lucerne (
Medicago sativa) were selected for analysis. The air-dried plants were then ground in a ball mill.
Figure 1 shows the organic materials used in the analysis.
Determining proportions of the tested plant substitutes in the mixture depends on many factors. In studies of this type [
24,
25,
26,
27], the proportions of biomass additives of 5 PHR, 10 PHR, 15 PHR, 20 PHR, and 30 PHR are often found. In this work, a fairly wide range of plant additive mixture shares was also established, defined here as 5 PHR, 10 PHR, 20 PHR, and 30 PHR.
Table 2 summarizes the proportions of the individual components of the mixtures with the dried plant materials tested in the following variants: 5 PHR, 10 PHR, 15 PHR, and 20 PHR.
2.2. Preparation of Samples for Testing
The rubber mixtures were prepared under laboratory conditions in a Brabender PlastiCorder tangential rotor mixer (Brabender GmbH & Co. KG, Duisburg, Germany) in a one-ethereal mixing cycle. The mixing process was controlled continuously according to a defined mixing regime:
Dosing of polymer (EPDM), filler (calcium carbonate), and plasticizer (paraffin oil), along with dried plants, into the mixer chamber.
Lowering the vertical wedge and setting the rotor speed of the mixer to 25 revolutions per minute (RPM).
Continuous mixing for 60 s (achieving a mixing temperature of approximately 70 °C).
Raising the vertical wedge, manually cleaning the pressure stamp of the mixer, and dosing the previously prepared crosslinking agent at approximately 70 °C.
Increasing the rotor speed to 30 RPM and mixing for 60 s.
Manually cleaning the mixer chamber, increasing the rotor speed to 35 RPM, and mixing for 60 s.
Mixing the rubber mixture (40 RPM) until the temperature reaches 95 °C.
Stopping the laboratory mixer motor, opening the chamber, and removing the prepared rubber mixture after approximately 5.5 min of mixing.
The prepared rubber mixtures were slabbed for 4 min to a thickness of 6 mm on a Polymix 110 L laboratory roller mill (Servitec, Wustermark, Germany). The temperature of the rollers was 50 °C (controlled by a temperature control unit (TCU) system to maintain the imposed roller temperatures) and the rollers were rotated at a preset friction of 1:1.2, at a speed of 20 RPM. After flotation, each rubber mixture was labelled for quick identification. The sample was labelled with the date of mixing and the mixture variant. The mixture was left to condition for 24 h in a room where the relative humidity was kept constant at (35 ± 5)%. Samples were taken for physico-mechanical testing of the prepared material.
The rubber mixture samples were then subjected to thermal vulcanization in a Fontijne laboratory press. The samples were vulcanized under a pressure of 10 MPa for 30 min at a temperature of 160 °C in special vulcanization molds. After vulcanization, the samples were cut using a cutting press equipped with a die, compliant with the PN-ISO 37-1 standard, into the shape of so-called paddles. The equipment used in the preparation of the samples for the strength tests is shown in
Figure 2.
The preparatory steps resulted in the formation of samples, as shown in
Figure 3.
2.3. Methods
The properties of the materials tested were determined in the following ranges and according to the following procedures:
The mechanical properties of the produced composites were tested using a ComeTech testing machine (ComeTech, Taichung City, Taiwan) (hardness tester), in accordance with the PN-ISO 37 standard, using standard paddle-shaped samples. The samples were subjected to a stress–strain test at a crosshead speed of 500 mm/min, with measurements taken at room temperature. Based on the obtained stress–strain curve, the tensile strength (TSb) and elongation at break (Eb) were determined. The results from 5 samples for each composite were averaged.
The determination of the specific weight was carried out using a PS360.R2 hydrostatic scale (densymeter) (RADWAG, Radom, Poland) by immersing a sample of unvulcanized rubber compound in distilled water, in accordance with PN-ISO 2781:1996.
The vulcanization characteristics of the rubber mixture were studied using a Moving Die Rheometer (MDR) from TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA). After cutting the samples on a press and calculating the mass to fill the vulcameter chamber, the samples were subjected to vulcanization at 175 °C for 10 min, in accordance with PN-ISO 6502. From the registered vulcanization curve, which can be defined as the relationship between torque and time, M = f(t), the following torque values are determined:
Time values:
t50—The vulcanization time at which the torque reaches 50% of the total torque (50% vulcanization degree), according to the following formula:
The kinematic viscosity of the rubber compounds was measured using a shear disk viscometer, model MV one (TA Instruments). The method involves measuring the torque required to maintain the rotation of a metal rotor in a cylindrical chamber. This chamber consists of two dies filled with a rubber compound. The resistance exerted by the mixture is expressed in conventional units—Mooney degrees—which characterize the viscosity of the mixture being tested. The samples, after being cut out using a cutting press and recalculated by weight to fill the viscosity-meter chamber, were subjected to the test. For the rubber compound viscosity test, defined as ML(1 + 4)100, the individual symbols stand for the following:
M—Method developer, Mooney.
L—Large rotor; it is also possible to use the S (small) rotor for materials with low specific density.
1—Preheating time before starting the rotor, [min].
4—Test duration counted from rotor start to final reading, [min].
100—Test temperature, [°C].
Testing of the colorimetric properties of the produced vulcanized composites was carried out with a Chroma Meter CR-410 colorimeter using SpectraMagic NX software (ver. 3.40). The results of the color tests were compared to a standard (reference, red-RAL 3016, rubber compound sample).
The samples for strength and hardness tests were subjected to elevated temperature air in an air-circulating oven (method B). The aging conditions are defined by ISO 188, while the strength test follows ISO 37, and the hardness test is conducted according to ISO 38. The aging of paddle-shaped samples was carried out for 70 h at a temperature of 135 °C.
The physico-mechanical tests of all the composites were conducted under temperature (21–25 °C) and humidity (40–60%) conditions controlled by a calibrated thermohygrometer.
3. Results
The results of the strength tests of the rubber samples with the addition of plant dry matter—from sage and lucerne—are presented in
Table 3. A classification of their properties is also introduced, based on the percentage change in the parameter values compared to the control sample, as well as the quality of the change. The color coding was adopted according to the principle shown in
Figure 6.
The better-than-control-sample assessment is used for a positive change in the value of a given parameter. This change, depending on the character of a given parameter, can take a negative or positive value. The range of the change value was not specified here—any percentage change in a given parameter to a more favorable one is considered a change for the better. The remaining three assessments—similar, slightly worse, and significantly worse—are only applicable to cases presenting worse results than samples without additives. In addition, a range of percentage change value is specified for each of these assessments. Similar-to-control-sample assessment is provided when the result of a given parameter is less favorable and the percentage change in value is within the range of up to +/−5%. Similarly, the slightly worse assessment covers a percentage change in value greater than +/−5% to +/−10%, while the significantly worse assessment is used for results characterized by a percentage change in value greater than +/−10%.
Among the variants of dried plant content in the samples, the best strength parameters are observed with the lowest one, namely 5 PHR. This applies to both sage and lucerne dried materials. Compared to the control sample, a deterioration in the values of almost all parameters is observed. However, it can be concluded that the addition of dried plant matter at the smallest proportion (5 PHR) does not significantly worsen the performance parameters of the rubber, while improving some of them. The properties that are improved by the plant additive include elongation at break (Eb) (for samples with sage added at 5 PHR and 10 PHR, and also for samples with lucerne added at 10 PHR) and color (for samples with sage added at 10 PHR, and also for samples with lucerne added at 5 PHR).
The percentage changes in selected properties of the mixtures with plant additives in relation to the mixture without plant additives are presented in
Figure 7 (sage) and
Figure 8 (lucerne).
The depiction of the relationship between the selected strength parameters and the content of dried plant matter is shown in
Figure 9,
Figure 10,
Figure 11 and
Figure 12. The data for the graphs are provided in
Table 4.
The properties of the tested samples were also examined after simulated aging. The results of the aging test are presented in
Table 5.
The results after ageing are somewhat surprising. The control sample showed a deterioration in values for two parameters—hardness and elongation at break. Tensile strength remains almost unchanged, while color improves significantly. In the case of the dried plant samples, most of the parameters worsened, but a significant increase is observed for most of the dried plant matter proportions in the case of tensile strength. This is the parameter for which no improvement was observed in the properties of the samples before the simulated ageing process. The probable mechanism responsible for this improvement is the internal migration of components within the material system. Ageing may promote the intensification of the adhesion of the lignocellulosic phase to the polymer matrix, which leads to the increased mechanical integrity of the composite.
4. Socio-Economic Analysis
The incorporation of plant-based fillers, such as sage (Salvia officinalis) and lucerne (Medicago sativa), into rubber composites not only influences material properties, but also has far-reaching socio-economic implications. This shift towards bio-based materials aligns with global sustainability goals and offers both direct and indirect benefits to various stakeholders, from farmers to manufacturers and consumers.
The integration of plant-based fillers, such as Salvia officinalis and Medicago sativa, into rubber composites represents a strategic convergence of materials science, environmental stewardship, and socio-economic development. Beyond the immediate environmental benefits—including reduced reliance on non-renewable resources and lower carbon emissions—this transition holds the potential to stimulate local economies, foster job creation, and fortify supply chain resilience. By replacing synthetic fillers with renewable alternatives, manufacturers can mitigate market volatility, align with evolving regulatory landscapes, and future-proof their operations against the rising costs of fossil-based materials.
Moreover, the adoption of bio-fillers opens avenues for technological innovation and market differentiation. While current trade-offs in mechanical performance necessitate further research and optimization, continuous advancements in material processing and hybrid filler systems could bridge this gap, enabling the production of high-performance, low-impact composites. As consumer demand and legislative pressure increasingly favor sustainable products, early adopters of bio-composite technologies will likely gain a competitive edge, accessing new revenue streams and strengthening brand value.
Ultimately, the shift towards bio-based fillers is not merely an environmental imperative, but a catalyst for systemic value creation. Through strategic collaboration between academia, industry, and policymakers, the widespread adoption of plant-derived fillers could drive a paradigm shift towards a truly circular economy—where material innovation is intrinsically linked to societal well-being and long-term economic resilience [
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34].
Table 6 shows the socio-economic benefits of sage and lucerne usage in polymer-based composites.
5. Conclusions
Based on the results obtained, it can be observed that dried plant matter can be considered as an alternative filler for highly filled EPDM compounds. The study examined the effect of using dried sage and lucerne, which, depending on their proportion in the mixture, modify the physico-chemical properties of the composite. The degree to which the properties of the rubber mixture change depends on the amount and type of dried plant matter used. The results showed that the best performance parameters were obtained for the smallest proportion of dried plant matter, namely 5 PHR, for both sage and lucerne. Improvements in some of the performance parameters were also observed for a lucerne content of 10 PHR. The parameters that improve with the addition of the tested plants are color and elongation at break, while most of the performance parameters do not change significantly for mixtures with a 5 PHR plant content. Nevertheless, it should be noted that, in general, mixtures containing dried plant matter present lower quality in most performance parameters. Based on these studies, the following trend can be observed: the higher the share of dried plant matter in the mixture, the worse the performance parameters. On the other hand, it should be noted that a small share of dried plant matter does not significantly affect the deterioration of performance parameters, and in some cases improves them. Hence, a general conclusion can be drawn indicating good prospects related to the inclusion of a small amount of dried plant matter in the mixture. Interestingly, the aging simulation carried out for half of the test variants showed a significant improvement in one parameter in relation to the control sample after aging, namely tensile strength. The probable cause of this phenomenon is the migration of components within the formulation. Ageing can cause dried plant matter to adhere to the polymer matrix. This is a relevant subject that may provide a foundation for a comprehensive assessment of additive migration and interfacial compatibility within the polymer matrix. Socio-economic analysis has shown a number of advantages associated with the use of dried sage and lucerne as substitutes in these mixtures. The wide-scale use of this solution will have a positive impact on the environment, the development of local agriculture, and the diversification of supplies of raw materials necessary for production.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M. and N.P.; methodology, M.M.; validation, N.P. and M.M.; formal analysis, M.M., N.P., A.W. and K.P.; investigation, M.M. and A.W.; resources, A.W.; data curation, M.M., N.P. and A.W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W. and N.P.; writing—review and editing, M.M. and K.P.; visualization, A.W.; supervision, M.M. and K.P.; funding acquisition, K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The article was funded by the Silesian University of Technology 08/030/BK_25/0151.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Conflicts of Interest
Author Marcin Marczak was employed by Unirubber Sp. z o.o. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
- Poranek, N.; Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk, B.; Lombardi, L.; Czajkowski, A.; Bogacka, M.; Pikoń, K. Green Deal and Circular Economy of Bottom Ash Waste Management in Building Industry—Alkali (NaOH) Pre-Treatment. Materials 2022, 15, 3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poranek, N.; Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk, B.; Czajkowski, A.; Pikoń, K. MSWIBA Formation and Geopolymerisation to Meet the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Climate Mitigation. Buildings 2022, 12, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baziak, A.; Pławecka, K.; Hager, I.; Castel, A.; Korniejenko, K. Development and characterization of lightweight geopolymer composite reinforced with hybrid carbon and steel. Materials 2021, 14, 5741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Masłowski, M.; Aleksieiev, A.; Miedzianowska, J.; Strzelec, K. Common Nettle (Urtica dioica L.) as an Active Filler of Natural Rubber Biocomposites. Materials 2021, 14, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miedzianowska, J.; Masłowski, M.; Rybiński, P.; Strzelec, K. Modified Nanoclays/Straw Fillers as Functional Additives of Natural Rubber Biocomposites. Polymers 2021, 13, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maciejewska, M.; Sowińska, A. Influence of Fillers and Ionic Liquids on the Crosslinking and Performance of Natural Rubber Biocomposites. Polymers 2021, 13, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masłowski, M.; Miedzianowska, J.; Strzelec, K. Natural rubber biocomposites containing corn, barley and wheat straw. Polym. Test. 2017, 63, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miedzianowska, J.; Masłowski, M.; Rybiński, P.; Strzelec, K. Straw/Nano-Additive Hybrids as Functional Fillers for Natural Rubber Biocomposites. Materials 2021, 14, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masłowski, M.; Miedzianowska, J.; Czylkowska, A.; Strzelec, K. Horsetail (Equisetum Arvense) as a Functional Filler for Natural Rubber Biocomposites. Materials 2020, 13, 2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi, H.; Mighri, F.; Rodrigue, D. A Review of Rubber Biocomposites Reinforced with Lignocellulosic Fillers. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurunathan, T.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S.K. A review of the recent developments in biocomposites based on natural fibres and their application perspectives. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 77, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Mu, B.; Yi, X.; Li, S.; Wang, Q. Sustainable use of coffee husks for reinforcing polyethylene composites. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yıldızhan, Ş.; Çalik, A.; Özcanlı, M.; Serin, H.; Çalık, A. Bio-composite materials: A short review of recent trends, mechanical and chemical properties, and applications. Eur. Mech. Sci. 2018, 2, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, A.K.; Vivekanandhan, S.; Pin, J.-M.; Misra, M. Composites from renewable and sustainable resources: Challenges and innovations. Science 2018, 362, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masek, A.; Zaborski, M.; Kosmalska, A.; Chrzescijanska, E. Eco-friendly elastomeric composites containing Sencha and Gun Powder green tea extracts. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2012, 15, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maciejewska, M.; Sowinska, A.; Kucharsk, J. Organic zinc salts as pro-ecological activators for sulfur vulcanization of styrene-butadiene rubber. Polymers 2019, 11, 1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biocomposites Market Size Global Report 2022–2030, Polaris Market Research. Available online: https://www.polarismarketresearch.com/industry-analysis/biocomposites-market (accessed on 7 June 2025).
- Peterson, S.C. Evaluating Corn Starch and Corn Stover Biochar as Renewable Filler in Carboxylated Styrene-Butadiene Rubber Composites. J. Elastomers Plast. 2012, 44, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pashaei, S.; Hosseinzadeh, S.; Syed, A.A. Studies on Coconut Shell Powder and Crysnanoclay Incorporated Acrylonitrile-Butadiene Rubber/ Styrene Butadiene Rubber (NBR/SBR) Green Nanocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pittayavinai, P.; Thanawan, S.; Amornsakchai, T. Manipulation of Mechanical Properties of Short Pineapple Leaf Fiber Reinforced Natural Rubber Composites through Variations in Cross-Link Density and Carbon Black Loading. Polym. Test. 2016, 54, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rybiński, P.; Syrek, B.; Masłowski, M.; Miedzianowska, J.; Strzelec, K.; Żukowski, W.; Bradło, D. Influence of Lignocellulose Fillers on Properties Natural Rubber Composites. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 2489–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datta, J.; Włoch, M. Preparation, Morphology and Properties of Natural Rubber Composites Filled with Untreated Short Jute Fibres. Polym. Bull. 2017, 74, 763–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Słota, D.; Florkiewicz, W.; Piętak, K.; Szwed, A.; Włodarczyk, M.; Siwińska, M.; Rudnicka, K.; Sobczak-Kupiec, A. Preparation, Characterization, and Biocompatibility Assessment of Polymer-Ceramic Composites Loaded with Salvia officinalis Extract. Materials 2021, 14, 6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Członka, S.; Kairytė, A.; Miedzińska, K.; Strąkowska, A.; Adamus-Włodarczyk, A. Mechanically Strong Polyurethane Composites Reinforced with Montmorillonite-Modified Sage Filler (Salvia officinalis L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miedzianowska-Masłowska, J.; Masłowski, M.; Strzelec, K. Alfalfa/Lucerne (Medicago sativa) as a Source of Functional Bioadditives for Elastomeric Natural Rubber Composites. Polymers 2024, 16, 3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juan-Polo, A.; Pavon, C.; de la Rosa-Ramírez, H.; López-Martínez, J. Use of Raw Peach Gum as a Sustainable Additive for the Development of Water-Sensitive and Biodegradable Thermoplastic Starch Films. Polymers 2023, 15, 3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dowbysz, A.; Samsonowicz, M.; Kukfisz, B. Recent Advances in Bio-Based Additive Flame Retardants for Thermosetting Resins. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noorbhai, N.; Iversen, L.L.; Rogers, K.G.; Kübler, S.; Brabant, C.; Zhou, J.; Bendixen, M. Continental mapping of African sand mining highlights limited benefits for local infrastructure and socio-economic development. One Earth 2025, 8, 101204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pery, A.R.; Schüürmann, G.; Ciffroy, P.; Faust, M.; Backhaus, T.; Aicher, L.; Mombelli, E.; Tebby, C.; Cronin, M.T.D.; Tissot, S.; et al. Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 456–457, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahraee, S.M.; Shiwakoti, N.; Stasinopoulos, P. Biomass supply chain environmental and socio-economic analysis: 40-Years comprehensive review of methods, decision issues, sustainability challenges, and the way forward. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 142, 105777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Repp, L.; Hekkert, M.; Kirchherr, J. Circular economy-induced global employment shifts in apparel value chains: Job reduction in apparel production activities, job growth in reuse and recycling activities. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 171, 105621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalde, M.C.; Nitivattananon, V.; Sharma, D.; Ninsawat, S. Effects of urban form and socio-economic factors on transport-related carbon dioxide emissions: A structural equation approach. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, A.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhang, H.; Guo, R.; Wu, J. Uncovering the multiple socio-economic driving factors of carbon emissions in nine urban agglomerations of China based on machine learning. Energy 2025, 319, 134859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunuwila, P.; Rodrigo, V.H.L.; Daigo, I.; Goto, N. Social impact improving model based on a novel social life cycle assessment for raw rubber production: A case of a Sri Lankan rubber estate. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 338, 130555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunuwila, P.; Rodrigo, V.H.L.; Goto, N. Sustainability of natural rubber processing can be improved: A case study with crepe rubber manufacturing in Sri Lanka. Resources. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 133, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, K.R.; De la OCampos, A.P.; Cavatassi, R.; Davis, B. Resilient and inclusive rural transformation in sub-Saharan Africa under climate, demographic, and social change: Challenges and opportunities for income growth and job creation. Glob. Food Secur. 2024, 43, 100815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X.; Xu, X.; Sun, Y. Enhancing resilience in supply chains through resource orchestration and AI assimilation: An empirical exploration. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2025, 195, 103980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radebe, N.; Chipangamate, N. Mining industry risks, and future critical minerals and metals supply chain resilience in emerging markets. Resour. Policy 2024, 91, 104887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, A.; Chakraborty, M. A review of ship emissions impacts on environmental, health, societal impacts and IMO’s mitigation policies. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2025, 81, 103964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Duca, V.; Ponsiglione, C.; Primario, S.; Strazzullo, S. Towards economic, environmental, and societal sustainable world: Reviewing the interplay of methodologies, variables, and impacts in energy transition models. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 479, 144074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, A.; Gartner, W.B.; Wilson, R. Entry order, market share, and competitive advantage: A study of their relationships in new corporate ventures. J. Bus. Ventur. 1989, 4, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.H.; Kumar, S.; Lee, K.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Yoon, S.W.; Bae, S.Y.; Shin, D.H. Advancing carbon fiber and its composites technology: Korea’s strategic growth and innovation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2025, 296, 112266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sala, R.; Pirola, F.; Arioli, V.; Dovere, E. Maintenance lifecycle cost analysis through Agent-Based Simulation. IFAC-Pap. 2024, 58, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Mohammadpourkarbasi, H.; Sharples, S. Life cycle carbon and cost assessments of the retrofit to Passivhaus EnerPHit standard of suburban residential buildings in Hunan, China. Energy Build. 2025, 332, 115417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kousovista, G.; Iakovides, G.; Petridis, S.; Chairopoulos, N.C.; Skembris, A.; Fotopoulou, M.; Rakopoulos, D. Comparative Lifecycle Assessment of Renewable Energy Investments in Public Buildings: A Case Study of an Austrian Kindergarten Under Atypical Operational Conditions. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-García, R.D.; Maldonado-Reyes, A.; Reyes-Gallegos, M.M.; Rodríguez-García, J.A.; Calles-Arriaga, C.A.; Rocha-Rangel, E. Management and Disposal of Waste Tires to Develop a Company for the Manufacture of Products Based on Recycled Rubber in Tamaulipas. Processes 2025, 13, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Dried organic materials used in the mixture: (a) sage (Salvia officinalis); (b) lucerne (Medicago sativa).
Figure 1.
Dried organic materials used in the mixture: (a) sage (Salvia officinalis); (b) lucerne (Medicago sativa).
Figure 2.
The equipment used in the preparation of the samples: (a) Brabender PlastiCorder mixer; (b) Fontijne laboratory press.
Figure 2.
The equipment used in the preparation of the samples: (a) Brabender PlastiCorder mixer; (b) Fontijne laboratory press.
Figure 3.
The view of the samples prepared for strength test.
Figure 3.
The view of the samples prepared for strength test.
Figure 4.
Laboratory stands: (a) hardness tester; (b) hydrostatic scale.
Figure 4.
Laboratory stands: (a) hardness tester; (b) hydrostatic scale.
Figure 5.
Laboratory stands: (a) for vulcanization test; (b) for viscosity test.
Figure 5.
Laboratory stands: (a) for vulcanization test; (b) for viscosity test.
Figure 6.
Evaluation of the properties of the tested samples.
Figure 6.
Evaluation of the properties of the tested samples.
Figure 7.
Percentage changes in properties of mixtures with plant additives in relation to the mixture without additives—results for sage.
Figure 7.
Percentage changes in properties of mixtures with plant additives in relation to the mixture without additives—results for sage.
Figure 8.
Percentage changes in properties of mixtures with plant additives in relation to the mixture without additives—results for lucerne.
Figure 8.
Percentage changes in properties of mixtures with plant additives in relation to the mixture without additives—results for lucerne.
Figure 9.
Dependence of hardness on dried plant content.
Figure 9.
Dependence of hardness on dried plant content.
Figure 10.
Dependence of the course of vulcanization on the content of dried plant matter.
Figure 10.
Dependence of the course of vulcanization on the content of dried plant matter.
Figure 11.
Dependence of tensile strength on dried plant content.
Figure 11.
Dependence of tensile strength on dried plant content.
Figure 12.
Dependence of elongation at break on dried plant content.
Figure 12.
Dependence of elongation at break on dried plant content.
Table 1.
The content of individual components in the control sample.
Table 1.
The content of individual components in the control sample.
Control Sample |
---|
Component | SP. GR. | Mass [g] | Content [%] | PHR * |
---|
EPDM | 1.23 | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 |
ENB | 1.23 | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 |
Paraffin oil | 0.87 | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 |
Calcium carbonate | 2.70 | 280.22 | 62.27 | 366.29 |
LDPE | 2.30 | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 |
Ferrum oxide | 5.25 | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.50 |
Stearic acid | 1.80 | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.50 |
Zinc oxide | 1.80 | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.30 |
Accelerators | 0.91 | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.70 |
Sulfur | 1.22 | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.70 |
Table 2.
Composition of samples with the addition of dried sage and dried lucerne.
Table 2.
Composition of samples with the addition of dried sage and dried lucerne.
Samples with the Addition of Sage |
---|
| 5 PHR of Sage | 10 PHR of Sage | 20 PHR of Sage | 30 PHR of Sage |
---|
Component | M [g] | % | PHR | M [g] | % | PHR | M [g] | % | PHR | M [g] | % | PHR |
---|
EPDM | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 |
EPDM off spec. | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 |
Paraffin oil | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 |
Calcium carbonate | 276.39 | 61.42 | 361.29 | 272.57 | 60.57 | 356.29 | 264.92 | 58.87 | 346.29 | 257.27 | 57.17 | 336.29 |
Poliethylene | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 |
Ferrum oxide | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.5 | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.5 | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.5 | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.53 |
Stearic acid | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.5 | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.5 | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.5 | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.53 |
Zincum oxide | 0.98 | 0.20 | 1.3 | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.3 | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.3 | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.28 |
Accelerators | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.7 | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.7 | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.7 | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.7 |
Sulfur | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.7 | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.7 | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.7 | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.69 |
Sage | 3.44 | 0.85 | 5.00 | 6.89 | 1.70 | 10.00 | 13.77 | 3.40 | 20.00 | 20.66 | 5.10 | 30.00 |
Samples with the Addition of Lucerne |
| 5 PHR of Lucerne | 10 PHR of Lucerne | 20 PHR of Lucerne | 30 PHR of Lucerne |
Component | M [g] | % | PHR | M [g] | % | PHR | M [g] | % | PHR | M [g] | % | PHR |
EPDM | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 | 31.90 | 7.09 | 41.70 |
EPDM off spec. | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 | 44.60 | 9.91 | 58.30 |
Paraffin oil | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 | 63.00 | 14.00 | 82.35 |
Calcium Carbonate | 276.39 | 61.42 | 361.29 | 272.57 | 60.57 | 356.29 | 264.92 | 58.87 | 346.29 | 257.27 | 57.17 | 336.29 |
Poliethylene | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 | 6.75 | 1.50 | 8.82 |
Ferrum oxide | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.50 | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.5 | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.5 | 18.00 | 4.00 | 23.53 |
Stearic acid | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.50 | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.50 | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.50 | 1.17 | 0.26 | 1.53 |
Zincum oxide | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.28 |
Accelerators | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.7 | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.7 | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.7 | 2.11 | 0.47 | 2.7 |
Sulfur | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.70 | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.70 | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.70 | 1.29 | 0.29 | 1.69 |
Lucerne | 3.44 | 0.85 | 5.00 | 6.89 | 1.70 | 10.00 | 13.77 | 3.40 | 20.00 | 20.66 | 5.10 | 30.00 |
Table 3.
Results of the strength tests.
Table 3.
Results of the strength tests.
Samples with the Addition of Sage | |
---|
| | | | 0 PHR | 5 PHR | 10 PHR | 20 PHR | 30 PHR |
---|
Property | Unit | Test Condition | Target | Value | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change |
---|
Hardness | ShA | 30 min, 170 °C | 55–65 | 58.2 | 56.4 | −3% | 56.70 | −3% | 44.4 | −24% | 35.4 | −39% |
Spec. grav. | - | 30 min, 170 °C | 1.55–1.65 | 1.58 | 1.57 | −1% | 1.58 | 0% | 1.34 | −15% | 1.20 | −24% |
ML | dNm | 10 min, 175 °C | - | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0% | 0.71 | 1% | 0.72 | 3% | 0.72 | 3% |
MH | dNm | 10 min, 175 °C | - | 7.86 | 7.61 | −3% | 7.10 | −10% | 5.16 | −34% | 4.69 | −40% |
MH-ML | dNm | - | >6.0 | 7.16 | 6.91 | −3% | 6.39 | −11% | 4.88 | −32% | 3.97 | −45% |
ts2 | min | 10 min, 175 °C | 0.8–1.2 | 1.61 | 1.43 | −11% | 1.37 | −15% | 1.36 | −16% | 1.46 | −9% |
t90 | min | 10 min, 175 °C | - | 7.27 | 6.53 | −10% | 5.75 | −21% | 4.34 | −40% | 3.72 | −49% |
MU | min | ML(1+4), 100 °C | 40–50 | 43.06 | 44.55 | 3% | 43.55 | 1% | 44.11 | 2% | 44.08 | 2% |
Tsb | MPa | 30 min, 170 °C | >4.0 | 4.65 | 4.13 | −11% | 3.85 | −17% | 2.03 | −56% | 1.51 | −68% |
Eb | % | 30 min, 170 °C | >600 | 550 | 559 | 2% | 574 | 4% | 520 | −5% | 460 | −16% |
Color | - | | <2.0 | 1.21 | 1.52 | 26% | 1.15 | −5% | 2.35 | 94% | 3.15 | 160% |
Samples with the Addition of Lucerne |
| | | | 0 PHR | 5 PHR | 10 PHR | 20 PHR | 30 PHR |
Property | Unit | Test Condition | Target | Value | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change |
Hardness | ShA | 30 min, 170 °C | 55–65 | 58.2 | 56.4 | −3% | 53.70 | −8% | 35.6 | −39% | 41.3 | −29% |
Spec. grav. | - | 30 min, 170 °C | 1.55–1.65 | 1.58 | 1.59 | 0% | 1.56 | −1% | 1.27 | −20% | 1.46 | −8% |
ML | dNm | 10 min, 175 °C | - | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0% | 0.73 | 4% | 0.75 | 7% | 0.80 | 14% |
MH | dNm | 10 min, 175 °C | - | 7.86 | 7.76 | −1% | 6.76 | −14% | 5.01 | −36% | 3.58 | −54% |
MH-ML | dNm | - | >6.0 | 7.16 | 7.06 | −1% | 6.03 | −16% | 4.26 | −41% | 2.78 | −61% |
ts2 | min | 10 min, 175 °C | 0.8–1.2 | 1.61 | 1.36 | −16% | 1.28 | −20% | 1.31 | −19% | 1.71 | 6% |
t90 | min | 10 min, 175 °C | - | 7.27 | 6.33 | −13% | 5.28 | −27% | 3.70 | −49% | 2.81 | −61% |
MU | min | ML(1+4), 100 °C | 40–50 | 43.06 | 44.30 | 3% | 43.02 | 0% | 43.79 | 2% | 46.70 | 8% |
Tsb | MPa | 30 min, 170 °C | >4.0 | 4.65 | 3.82 | −18% | 3.57 | −23% | 1.53 | −67% | 1.33 | −71% |
Eb | % | 30 min, 170 °C | >600 | 550 | 538 | −2% | 574 | 4% | 382 | −31% | 470 | −15% |
Color | - | | <2.0 | 1.21 | 0.94 | −22% | 1.58 | 31% | 3.01 | 149% | 3.37 | 179% |
Table 4.
The relationship between the tested parameters and the content of dried plant matter.
Table 4.
The relationship between the tested parameters and the content of dried plant matter.
Dried Plant Content [PHR] | Sage | Lucerne |
---|
Hardness [ShA] | dM [dNm] | Tsb [MPa] | Eb [%] | Hardness [ShA] | dM [dNm] | Tsb [MPa] | Eb [%] |
---|
5 | 56.4 | 6.91 | 4.13 | 559 | 56.4 | 7.06 | 3.82 | 538 |
10 | 56.7 | 6.39 | 3.85 | 574 | 53.7 | 6.03 | 3.57 | 574 |
20 | 44.4 | 4.88 | 2.03 | 520 | 35.6 | 4.26 | 1.53 | 382 |
30 | 35.4 | 3.97 | 1.51 | 460 | 41.3 | 2.78 | 1.33 | 470 |
Table 5.
Results after aging at 70° for 14 days.
Table 5.
Results after aging at 70° for 14 days.
Samples with the Addition of Sage | |
---|
| | | | 0 PHR | 5 PHR | 10 PHR | 20 PHR | 30 PHR |
---|
Property | Unit | Test Condition | Target | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change |
---|
Hardness | ShA | 30 min, 170 °C | 55–65 | 65.2 | 12% | 64.5 | 14% | 65.40 | 15% | 57.7 | 30% | 46.1 | 30% |
Tsb | MPa | 30 min, 170 °C | >4.0 | 4.45 | −4% | 4.01 | −3% | 3.60 | −6% | 2.14 | 5% | 2.24 | 48% |
Eb | % | 30 min, 170 °C | >600 | 447 | −19% | 452 | −19% | 439 | −24% | 420 | −19% | 460 | 0% |
Color | - | | <2.0 | 0.94 | −22% | 2.10 | 38% | 2.23 | 94% | 4.04 | 72% | 6.80 | 116% |
Samples with the Addition of Lucerne |
| | | | 0 PHR | 5 PHR | 10 PHR | 20 PHR | 30 PHR |
Property | Unit | Test Condition | Target | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change | Value | % Change |
Hardness | ShA | 30 min, 170 °C | 55–65 | 65.2 | 12% | 66.8 | 18% | 60.80 | 13% | 38.20 | 7% | 47.00 | 14% |
Tsb | MPa | 30 min, 170 °C | >4.0 | 4.45 | −4% | 4.39 | 15% | 3.96 | 11% | 1.60 | 5% | 1.22 | −8% |
Eb | % | 30 min, 170 °C | >600 | 447 | −19% | 483 | −10% | 512 | −11% | 301 | −21% | 132 | −72% |
Color | - | | <2.0 | 0.94 | −22% | 1.67 | 78% | 3.08 | 95% | 5.62 | 87% | 5.47 | 62% |
Table 6.
Socio-economic benefits of sage and lucerne usage in polymer-based composites.
Table 6.
Socio-economic benefits of sage and lucerne usage in polymer-based composites.
Category | Description |
---|
Local Job Creation and Agricultural Development [34,35,36,37] | Utilizing natural fillers derived from plants can stimulate local agricultural sectors, especially in rural areas with suitable conditions for growing sage and lucerne. This change encourages small-scale farming and could create employment opportunities across multiple stages of the supply chain:Cultivation and Harvesting: Increased demand for plant fillers would boost crop production, creating seasonal and long-term jobs for farmers, laborers, and transport workers. Processing and Pre-Treatment: Post-harvest activities, such as drying, grinding, and refining plant materials for industrial use, could lead to the establishment of small processing facilities, driving local business growth. Distribution and Logistics: Expanding supply chains for natural fillers would generate jobs in logistics, warehousing, and material handling, benefiting regional economies.
|
Supply Chain Resilience and Resource Independence [34,35,36,37,38] | Relying on plant-based fillers reduces dependence on synthetic or fossil-derived materials, which are often subject to volatile market prices and geopolitical disruptions. By integrating locally grown and renewable materials,Producers mitigate raw material price fluctuations, stabilizing production costs and improving long-term financial planning. Regional economies gain autonomy, reducing reliance on imported fillers and strengthening domestic manufacturing. Circular economy models become viable—agricultural waste and non-food crops are repurposed as raw materials, promoting resource efficiency and reducing environmental strain.
|
Environmental and Societal Health Benefits [34,35,36,37,38] | The transition to bio-fillers contributes to public health and environmental sustainability:Reduced Pollution: Natural fillers generate less pollution during production than synthetic alternatives, lowering emissions and minimizing industrial waste. Safer Work Environments: Using plant-based materials can decrease workers' exposure to hazardous chemicals and fine particulate matter, reducing occupational health risks. Consumer Health and Perception: End consumers may view bio-composite products as healthier and safer, especially in applications like footwear, household goods, or children’s toys, driving market demand for eco-friendly alternatives.
|
Market Competitiveness and Innovation Opportunities [34,39,40,41,42] | With growing consumer awareness of sustainability and the pressure of environmental regulations, companies that pioneer plant-based composites gain a competitive advantage. Using fillers like sage and lucerne not only enhances a company's green image, but can alsoOpen new market segments: Eco-conscious consumers are willing to pay a premium for sustainable products, expanding business opportunities. Attract funding and partnerships: Innovation in bio-composites aligns with government and EU funding programs supporting circular economy initiatives. Drive technological innovation: The search for optimal filler compositions (e.g., 5 or 10 PHR) could lead to breakthroughs in materials science, with applications beyond rubber composites, such as in coatings, packaging, or biomedical materials.
|
Long-Term Cost Efficiency and Lifecycle Savings [34,43,44,45,46] | Although bio-fillers may slightly reduce mechanical properties, they offer long-term cost advantages:Lower Disposal Costs: Natural fillers are biodegradable or easier to process at the product’s end of life, reducing landfill fees and simplifying waste management. Regulatory Compliance: As carbon taxes and environmental restrictions tighten, bio-composite producers could avoid penalties and benefit from incentives for low-impact manufacturing. Material Circularity: Residual plant waste from production could be repurposed as biomass energy or compost, creating closed-loop systems that reduce costs and resource consumption.
|
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).