Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Assessment and Freeze–Thaw Durability Prediction of Wet-Sprayed Concrete for Cold-Region Tunnels
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Biochemical and Microbial Behavior of Poly(Lactide) Composites with Polyethersulfone and Copper-Complexed Cellulose Phosphate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Workability and Mechanical Properties of PVA Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with Hybrid Dune Sand and Steel Slag Aggregates

1
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China
2
College of Water Conservancy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(13), 2956; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18132956
Submission received: 15 May 2025 / Revised: 14 June 2025 / Accepted: 20 June 2025 / Published: 22 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

To mitigate ecological damage from excessive natural aggregate extraction, this study developed an eco-friendly concrete using dune sand and steel slag as natural aggregates, enhanced with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers. Through orthogonal testing, the effects of the dune sand replacement ratio, steel slag replacement ratio, PVA fiber length, and PVA fiber content on concrete workability and mechanical properties were analyzed. The results show that slump exceeded 120 mm (meeting engineering requirements) in mixes except that with 40% dune sand, 60% steel slag, 18 mm PVA fiber length, and 0.4% PVA fiber content; 50% steel slag replacement significantly improved mechanical properties, yielding a 21.2% increase in 28 d compressive strength when replacement increased from 30% to 50%; 20% dune sand replacement for river sand is optimal; and while increased PVA content enhanced splitting tensile and flexural strengths, both its length and content should not exceed 9 mm and 0.3%, respectively. The concrete delivers acceptable performance while providing dual environmental benefits: reduced aggregate consumption pressure and achieved high-value-added dune sand–steel slag utilization.

1. Introduction

At present, river sand is mainly used as the fine aggregate of concrete. As one naturally consumes unrenewable resources, the massive exploitation of river sand severely destroys natural resources and makes the cost of river sand resources increase. It has been reported that the demand for natural sand increased approximately 23-fold from 1900 to 2006 [1], while its consumption has doubled over the past two decades [2]. This excessive depletion of natural resources has led to serious environmental degradation over time [3]. Therefore, it is urgent to explore new alternative fine aggregates. Now the desert covers about 18% of Chinese land area, and dune sand resources are relatively abundant [4]. Dune sand has been demonstrated as a viable alternative aggregate for concrete [5].
In recent years, steel slag has occupied substantial land resources, and waste liquids from steel slag have penetrated surrounding soil, causing environmental pollution. Steel slag is an underutilized industrial byproduct, with less than 25% being recycled in China despite its generation in steel production processes [6]; consequently, most steel slag is still landfilled as industrial waste. Research on utilizing waste steel slag as coarse aggregate in concrete holds significant environmental importance.
In addition, for concrete members, which are limited by their maximum crack width, their design bearing capacity fails to reach the ideal state and cannot fully utilize the advantages of concrete [7]. Some scholars [8,9,10] believe that concrete cracks can be reduced by adding polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers to concrete, leveraging the hydrophilicity of PVA fibers to lower the evaporation rate. In fact, PVA fibers themselves can absorb energy, improve the mechanical properties of concrete, and inhibit crack development. Notably, free calcium oxide (f-CaO) in steel slag aggregates compromises volumetric stability [11]. Moreover, incorporating fine-grained dune sand exacerbates drying shrinkage of concrete [12]. PVA fiber incorporation simultaneously counteracts both detrimental effects: the hydrophilic properties suppress f-CaO hydration expansion [13], while its fiber-bridging effect compensates for shrinkage stresses [14].
Under these circumstances, researchers have conducted studies on dune sand concrete, steel slag concrete, and PVA fiber-reinforced concrete. Research on dune sand concrete has been conducted by researchers [15,16,17,18,19,20]. These studies focused on workability, strength, fluidity, plastic viscosity, and frost resistance of concrete. The results demonstrate that dune sand significantly affects concrete performance and improves frost resistance. In addition, studies by Felekoglu et al. [21], Qasrawi et al. [22,23], and He et al. [24] demonstrated that adding an appropriate amount of steel slag to concrete utilizes waste effectively and enhances workability, flexural strength, compressive strength, and splitting tensile strength. Recently, Alhozaimy et al. [25], Noushini et al. [26], Lin [27], and Qian et al. [28] have explored the influence of PVA fibers on concrete properties. Their results indicate that impact resistance, flexural strength, and flexural strength improve with optimal PVA fiber lengths and mix proportions.
Beyond single-factor studies, researchers have investigated the combined effects of dune sand, steel slag, and PVA fibers on concrete strength and workability over many years [29,30,31,32,33]. However, existing studies predominantly focus on substituting either coarse or fine natural aggregates with alternative materials, whereas research involving simultaneous replacement of both remains scarce. Therefore, in the current study, steel slag replaces natural gravel and dune sand substitutes natural sand to prepare environmentally friendly concrete, with PVA fiber added to enhance its performance.

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials

This study employed ordinary Portland cement (OPC, P⋅O 42.5) from LNJD Cement Factory, with properties detailed in Table 1. Two coarse aggregates (natural pebble and steel slag) were utilized; their physical properties are presented in Table 2. Prior to utilization, the steel slag was stockpiled at a landfill site for two years. This duration is sufficient to neutralize potential stability risks from f-CaO content [34].
The properties of dune sand and river sand are given in Table 3. The particle grading of aggregates is plotted in Figure 1. The main difference between dune sand and river sand is that the fineness modulus of dune sand is twice that of river sand, but the average particle size of the former is half that of the latter.
A naphthalene-based high-range water reducer (HRWR) was employed, providing a water reduction rate of 25%.
The PVA fibers were purchased from one chemical technology in Shanghai. The physical properties are shown in Table 4.

2.2. Orthogonal Test Design

Orthogonal array testing can effectively reduce the required number of specimens and test times. This method achieves orthogonality by selecting representative points from the full factorial experiment. This study employed a four-factor, four-level orthogonal experimental design based on the L16(44) orthogonal array. Based on relevant studies indicating optimal replacement ratios of 20% for dune sand (RDS) [35,36,37,38] and 50% for the optimal steel slag replacement ratio (RSS) [39,40], the current research adopted RDS values of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, alongside RSS values of 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%. The selection of PVA fiber lengths (LPVA) (3 mm, 9 mm, 12 mm, and 18 mm) and fiber content (VPVA) (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4%) referenced methodologies from Wang et al. [41] and Luo et al. [42]. As shown in Table 5, the factor levels were set as follows: RDS at 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%; RSS at 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%; LPVA at 3 mm, 9 mm, 12 mm, and 18 mm; VPVA at 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4%.

2.3. Mix Proportions

When making PVA fiber-reinforced concrete containing dune sand and steel slag aggregate (DS/SS-FRC) specimens, the ready-mix method is carried out according to the calculated content of each component, and then the final dosage of each component is determined. The mix proportions of DS/SS-FRC are shown in Table 6. River sand is replaced by dune sand with weight percentages of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, and natural pebble is replaced by steel slag with weight percentages of 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%. Different lengths of PVA fibers (3 mm, 9 mm, 12 mm, 18 mm) are added directly to the concrete in different volume percentages of 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4%.

2.4. Casting and Testing

To address the issue of PVA fiber agglomeration, a pre-treatment was performed on the fibers prior to DS/SS-FRC preparation: the antistatic agent SN was employed as a fiber dispersant at a dosage of 0.1% by mass of cement. Specifically, the fibers were pre-treated for 2 min using a high-speed mixer operating at 285 rpm. The DS/SS-FRC preparation proceeded after this pre-treatment step. According to the requirements of China Standards GB/T 50080 [43], the mixing of DS/SS-FRC mainly includes four steps. The mixing sequence began with fine aggregates blended for 5 min. Coarse aggregates were then introduced and mixed for a further minute. Subsequently, PVA fibers were uniformly dispersed and mixed for 1 min. Finally, the total mixing water combined with the HRWR was added and thoroughly mixed for 2 min. Following the slump test, the fresh mixture was placed into 100 × 100 × 100 mm3 cubic molds for compressive and splitting tensile strength testing as well as into 100 × 100 × 400 mm3 prism molds for flexural strength testing. The filled molds were placed on a vibration table to consolidate the mixture and remove air voids. Excess DS/SS-FRC was struck off level with the mold tops using a scraper. The specimens were covered with cling film and cured at 20 ± 5 °C with ≥95% relative humidity for 24 h according to GB/T 50080 [44]. After demolding, the specimens were cured to a standard curing room until reaching the specified testing age.
Following GB/T 50081 [45], compressive (fcus), splitting tensile (ftts), and flexural strength (ftl) tests were conducted after 3, 7, 28, 60, and 90 days using a 1000 kN electro-hydraulic servo testing machine. Loading rates of 0.5 MPa/s (compression) and 0.05 MPa/s (tensile/flexural) were applied until failure. Results represent the average of six specimens per test.

3. Test Results and Evaluations

The results of the workability and mechanical properties tests are presented in Table 7.
Orthogonal range analysis enhances experimental efficiency by distributing multiple factors across evenly spaced test levels with minimal trial requirements. Table 8 presents the results of the range analysis.
Table 8 defines kij as the average test result of factor “i” at level “j”. The corresponding range value Ri is derived from the extreme kij differences of factor “i”.

3.1. Workability

In the slump test, except for D40S60PL18V0.4 (RDS = 40%, RSS = 60%, LPVA = 18 mm, VPVA = 0.4%), the slump values of the rest were all higher than 120 mm, indicating that the slump met the requirements of engineering construction. In the slump test, there was no stratification or segregation, which demonstrated good cohesion. There was no bleeding in the extensibility test, which indicated good water retention.
The range analysis results for slump are plotted in Figure 2. The average slump gradually decreased with an increase in RDS. As the RDS increased from 10% to 20%, 30%, and finally to 40%, the average slump decreased from 162.25 mm to 149 mm, 146 mm, and then to 144 mm. The main reason for this decrease in slump was that compared with river sand, dune sand had more fine particles, and its average particle size was only half of that of river sand (Figure 1).
Figure 2 demonstrates the slump of DS/SS-FRC, showing a gradual decrease as the RSS increases, which is consistent with the findings reported by Panda et al. [35]. This occurred mainly because the surface of the steel slag was porous, allowing water molecules to more easily enter and hydrate the active substances. This resulted in increased water demand, reduced moisture in the cement paste, and consequently decreased slump.
The relationship between slump and different lengths and contents of PVA fibers is also plotted in Figure 2. When the LPVA was between 3 mm and 12 mm, changes in the average slump were not obvious. When the LPVA increased from 12 mm to 18 mm, however, the slump decreased from 158.25 mm to 135.00 mm, showing a significant downward trend. Possible reasons are that when fiber length is within a reasonable range, its effect on concrete fluidity and water retention is not obvious. However, when fiber length is too long and exceeds a certain range, intertwining, clumping, and bunching between the fibers can occur during mixing. This adversely affects concrete fluidity, resulting in a significant decline in slump.
When the VPVA increased from 0.1% to 0.4%, the average slump decreased from 177.25 mm to 121.50 mm, and the average slump loss exceeded 30%. This may have occurred because the PVA fiber had a strong ability to absorb free water, which increased the viscosity of the cement slurry. Additionally, the larger specific surface area of PVA fiber compared to other concrete mixtures resulted in more cement slurry surrounding the fibers, which significantly reduced concrete fluidity.
Apart from slump test results, these factors also affected extensibility. The range analysis results for extensibility are shown in Figure 3. As RDS increased from 10% to 20%, extensibility decreased from 330.00 mm to 292.50 mm. However, extensibility gradually increased to 296.25 mm (RDS = 30%) and 307.50 mm (RDS = 40%) with further replacement increases.
The figure also indicates a linear decline in extensibility with increasing RSS: at 40%, 50%, and 60%, extensibility fell linearly from 336.25 mm to 313.75 mm (−6.7%), 293.75 mm (−12.6%), and 282.5 mm (−16.0%).
Additionally, extensibility dropped from 336.25 mm to 305.00 mm as fiber length increased from 3 mm to 9 mm, remained stable between 9 mm and 12 mm, and then decreased to 278.75 mm at 18 mm. Extensibility linearly decreased from 358.75 mm to 253.75 mm as PVA fiber content rose from 0.1% to 0.4%.

3.2. Compressive Strength

Figure 4 illustrates the impact trend of RDS, RSS, LPVA, and VPVA on the range analysis results for compressive strength (fcus) of DS/SS-FRC. When the RDS kept increasing, the fcus of DS/SS-FRC in the early strength of 3 d and 7 d decreased slightly, while the fcus of DS/SS-FRC in the later strength of 28 d, 60 d, and 90 d increased first and then decreased (Figure 4a). With the increase in age, the influence of RDS on the fcus of DS/SS-FRC gradually weakens. This is mainly due to the fact that in terms of early strength, the fineness modulus of dune sand is only half that of river sand, and the grading is worse than that of river sand. At the early stage of the hydration reaction, the total surface area of the mixture increased due to the addition of dune sand, which increased the water requirement, thus affecting the hydration of concrete and ultimately slowing down the hydration reaction. The reason for the weakening influence on the later strength is that dune sand with smaller fineness grading can fully fill the small void between the coarse and fine aggregate mixture, increase the mixture compactness, and improve the fcus. The best RDS was about 20%, and the fcus reached its peak at 28 d, 60 d, and 90 d. Similar results were obtained by Benabed et al. [36], Menadi et al. [37], and Liu et al. [38].
From Figure 4b, with the increase in RSS, the fcus of DS/SS-FRC at each age increased first and then decreased. They reached the peak value when the replacement rate was 50% (with a 21.2% improvement in 28 d fcus). This aligns with the findings of Saxena and Tembhurkar [40] and Fu et al. [41]. The reason is the surface of steel slag is rough and porous, which can be better combined with cementing materials than pebbles, and it enhances the interface bonding force of the coarse aggregate [9]. However, with increasing amounts of steel slag, the coarse aggregates absorbed too much water, which made the water loss in the cementing and seriously affected the bonding between the cement and the aggregate.
As shown in Figure 4c, the fcus initially rose then fell with an increasing LPVA, peaking at 9 mm. This occurs because very short fibers generate only weak bonding/friction with cement paste, while excessively long fibers entangle and form clumps, compromising fiber–cement paste bonding.
From Figure 4d, when VPVA increased from 0.1% to 0.2% and then to 0.3%, the fcus of specimens at all ages first decreased slightly then increased significantly. At 0.4% content, strength decreased markedly (max. reduction: 9.4%). As flexible fibers, PVA could not independently resist pressure but enhanced concrete compactness via embedding. Optimal embedding occurred at 0.3% additional content, maximizing strength. For fiber content > 0.3%, dispersion became worse.

3.3. Splitting Tensile Strength

Figure 5 shows the impact trend of RDS, RSS, LPVA, and VPVA on the range analysis results for the splitting tensile strength (ftts) of DS/SS-FRC. When the RDS was 20%, the ftts reached its peak. When the RDS was greater than 20%, the ftts decreased (Figure 5a). This is because the fine aggregate of dune sand was filled in the coarse aggregate of the DS/SS-FRC, which improves the compactness of the concrete and the mechanical biting force between the aggregates, thus enhancing the ftts of the DS/SS-FRC. When the RDS was 20%, the compaction effect was the best.
From Figure 5b, when the RSS increased from 30% to 60%, the ftts at 7 d, 28 d, and 90 d first increased and then decreased. When the RSS was 50%, the ftts reached the peak, which is consistent with the compressive strength result.
From Figure 5c, it shows that with the increase in the LPVA, the ftts of the specimens shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. When the LPVA was 9 mm and 12 mm, the ftts of specimen was very close and reached the maximum value.
As shown Figure 5d, the ftts of specimen increased first and then decreased with the VPVA increasing from 0.1% to 0.4%. The ftts reached the maximum value as the VPVA was 0.3%. When the fiber content is appropriate, the mechanical properties of foam concrete can be significantly improved, mainly due to the bridging effect of fibers on cracks [9]. Conversely, excessive fiber content is prone to agglomeration, thereby reducing the improvement effect on the ftts.

3.4. Flexural Strength

Figure 6 shows the impact trend of RDS, RSS, LPVA, and VPVA on the range analysis results for the flexural strength (ftl) of DS/SS-FRC. With the increase in RDS, the ftl of the test specimen increased first and then decreased. When the RDS was 20%, the ftl of the specimen reached the peak (Figure 6a). The ftl increased first and then had a declining trend with the RSS from 30% to 60% at Figure 6b. The ftl was very close when the RSS was 40% and 50%, and it reached the peak value. From Figure 6c, it shows that the ftl of the specimen rises first and is then reduced with an LPVA of 3 mm to 18 mm. The ftl of the DS/SS-FRC reached its peak value when the LPVA was 9 mm. When the VPVA increased from 0.1% to 0.3%, the ftl increased and then declined as the VPVA increased to 0.4%, as shown in Figure 6d. The ftl achieved the highest at a VPVA of 0.3%.

3.5. Strength Conversion Calculation Formula

The conversion formula between compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of ordinary concrete in accordance with the China Standards GB50010 [46] is as follows:
f ts = 0.19 f cu 0.75
where fts is the splitting tensile strength of ordinary concrete; fcu is the compressive strength of ordinary concrete.
According to the calculation in Formula (1), the differences between the predicted values and the test results are large. This may be due to the adding of dune sand, steel slag, and PVA fiber in concrete, so the parameters of Formula (1) are no longer applicable and need to be modified. Therefore, the strength conversion calculation formula for DS/SS-FRC should be modified by using the experimental data.
f tss = 0.093 f cus 1.023
where ftss is the splitting tensile strength of DS/SS-FRC; fcus is the compressive strength of DS/SS-FRC.
Similarly, through the regression analysis of the measured test results, the conversion formula of flexural strength and compressive strength is obtained as follows.
f tl = 0.632 f cus 0.605
where ftl is the flexural strength of DS/SS-FRC.

3.6. Compressive Strength Growth Model

In order to obtain a fitting formula between the compressive strength and age of DS/SS-FRC, four fitting methods were used to fit the compressive strength, such as logarithmic fitting, linear fitting, quadratic polynomial fitting, and exponential fitting. The fitting results are shown in Table 9.
As can be seen from Table 9, by using the above method to fit compressive strength and age, it can be found that quadratic polynomial fitting lacks regularity. The regularity of index fitting was good, but it was obviously contrary to the general development law of concrete strength in practical engineering. Linear fitting had the worst fitting effect. The logarithmic fitting device had strong regularity and was more in line with the current prediction of DS/SS-FRC strength development. This choice was fundamentally motivated by the capacity to capture the physicochemical kinetics of cement hydration reactions, which was prioritized over mere statistical goodness of fit for specific datasets. Therefore, logarithmic fitting was recommended for the fitting formula model of the late compressive strength of DS/SS-FRC based on the early and middle strength. The formula is as follows:
f cu , d = 8.72 ln d + 20.68
where d is the age of the DS/SS-FRC; fcu,d is the d-day compressive strength of DS/SS-FRC.
Through logarithmic fitting calculations, the relative deviations between the predicted and experimentally measured compressive strengths of DS/SS-FRC at 3 d, 7 d, 28 d, 60 d, and 90 d curing ages were determined to be 2.43%, 0.54%, 2.95%, 0.70%, and 2.15%, respectively.

4. Conclusions

(1) Dune sand replacement at 20% maximizes concrete mechanical properties. Steel slag replacement exhibits peak strength at 50%, following an initial increase and subsequent decline.
(2) The incorporation of PVA fibers significantly enhances the splitting tensile strength and flexural strength of DS/SS-FRC. It is recommended that the selected PVA fibers not exceed 9 mm in length, with a content not exceeding 0.3%.
(3) Through the regression analysis of experimental results, the conversion formula for the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of DS/SS-FRC is established as f tss = 0.093 f cus 1.023 . The conversion formula for flexural strength and compressive strength is f tl = 0.632 f cus 0.605 . The strength growth prediction model of DS/SS-FRC is obtained as f cu , d = 9.35 ln d + 18.96 .
The present study was limited to testing mechanical properties of DS/SS-FRC at up to 90 days of aging. Future research will conduct long-term performance tests on DS/SS-FRC, thus enabling a more comprehensive evaluation of the effects of dune sand and steel slag aggregates on concrete properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L.; methodology, Y.L.; software, S.J.; validation, Q.R.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, T.L.; resources, Y.L.; data curation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, T.L.; visualization, X.W.; supervision, S.J.; project administration, Q.R.; funding acquisition, Q.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research reported in this paper is supported by the Key Research Projects of Guangdong Province for Universities, China (2024ZDZX4071). Here, we express our deep appreciation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

We all declare that we have no conflicts of interest in this paper.

References

  1. Torres, A.; Brandt, J.; Lear, K.; Liu, J. A looming tragedy of the sand commons. Science 2017, 357, 970–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cousins, S. Shifting sand: Why we’re running out of aggregate. Constr. Res. Innov. 2019, 10, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Santhosh, K.G.; Subhani, S.M.; Bahurudeen, A. Cleaner production of concrete by using industrial by-products as fine aggregate: A sustainable solution to excessive river sand mining. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 42, 102415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, T.; Zhao, H.L. Fifty-year history of China desert science. J. Desert Res. 2005, 25, 145–165. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, T.H.; Wang, Q.H.; Ren, Q.X.; Li, T.; Sun, H.Y.; Ding, J.N. Compressive and flexural properties of engineered geopolymer composites incorporating dune sands. Structures 2025, 78, 109251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zeng, B.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, S.; Mo, H.J.; Jin, F. Alkanolamines-activated steel slag for stabilization/solidification of heavy metal contaminated soil. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yuan, Y.; Peng, D.C.; Shao, X.Y. Crack analyzing of PVA fiber reinforced concrete beam. Ind. Constr. 2002, 32, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao, S.L. Study on Pseudo Strain-Hardening and Fracture Characteristic of Polyvinyl Alcohol Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites. Ph.D. Thesis, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, T.; Wang, Q.H.; Ren, Q.X. Compressive behavior of polyvinyl alcohol engineered cementitious composites incorporating steel slag as aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 413, 134878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, T.; Ren, Q.X.; Wang, Q.H.; Zhang, Y.N.; Ding, J.N. Capillary of engineered cementitious composites using steel slag aggregate. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 98, 111504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Z.H.; Jin, Q.; Hu, D.; Zhu, L.; Li, Z.H.; Su, W.Z. Long-term volume stability of steel slag sand mortar and concrete. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 22, e04179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, E.; Park, S.J.; Kim, Y.J. Drying shrinkage cracking of concrete using dune sand and crushed sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 126, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiong, X.L.; Yang, Z.X.; Yan, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, S.; Li, K.; Briseghella, B.; Marano, G.C. Mechanical properties and microstructure of engineered cementitious composites with high volume steel slag and GGBFS. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 398, 132512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yao, J.; Ge, Y.L.; Ruan, W.Q.; Meng, J. Effects of PVA fiber on shrinkage deformation and mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 417, 135399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guettala, S.; Mezghiche, B. Compressive strength and hydration with age of cement pastes containing dune sand powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 25, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, S.; Lee, E.; Ko, J.; Yoo, J.; Kim, Y. Rheological properties of concrete using dune sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 172, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Necira, B.; Guettala, A.; Guettala, S. Study of the combined effect of different types of sand on the characteristics of high performance self-compacting concrete. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2017, 31, 1912–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, S.X.; Qin, Y.J.; Cui, Z.; Chen, C.D. Study on mix ratio of sand concrete in Taklimakan desert. New Build. Mater. 2019, 11, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, H.P.; Gui, Z. Experimental study on splitting tensile strength of desert sand concrete. Fly Ash Compr. Util. 2022, 36, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu, J.C.; Shen, X.D. Analysis on frost resistance and damage mechanism of aeolian sand concrete. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 184–190. [Google Scholar]
  21. Felekoglu, B.; Turkel, S.; Baradan, B. Effect of water/cement ratio on the fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 1795–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qasrawi, H.; Shalabi, F.; Asi, I. Use of low CaO unprocessed steel slag in concrete as fine aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qasrawi, H. The use of steel slag aggregate to enhance the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete and retain the environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 54, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. He, X.M.; Ge, X.Y.; Zhang, B. Study on basic mechanical properties of steel slag aggregate concrete. Build. Sci. 2023, 39, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  25. Alhozaimy, A.M.; Soroushian, P.; Mirza, F. Mechanical properties of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete and the effects of pozzolanic materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 1996, 18, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Noushini, A.; Samali, B.; Vessalas, K. Static mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol fibre reinforced concrete (PVA-FRC). Mag. Concr. Res. 2014, 66, 465–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, H. Research on the Performance of Mechanics and Deformation of Concrete with PVA Fiber. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  28. Qian, G.F.; Gao, X.B.; Qian, C.X. Effect of PVA fiber on mechanical properties of concrete. China Concr. Cem. Prod. 2010, 3, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hadjoudja, M.; Khenfer, M.M.; Mesbah, H.A.; Yahia, A. Statistical models to optimize fiber-reinforced dune sand concrete. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2014, 39, 2721–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ahmad, S.; Hakeem, I.; Maslehuddin, M. Development of an optimum mixture of ultra-high performance concrete. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2016, 20, 1106–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, X.J.; Gao, Z.; Cao, P.; Zhou, C.J. Mechanical properties tests and multiscale numerical simulations for basalt fiber reinforced concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 202, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, J.; Sawulet, B.; Li, X.M. Effect of hybrid fibers on mechanical properties of concrete mixed with desert sand. Concrete 2023, 406, 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  33. Qiao, L. Research on the Mix Proportion Optimization and Mechanical and Frost Resistance Durability of Dune Sand Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Master’s Thesis, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dong, Q.; Wang, G.; Chen, X.; Tan, J.; Gu, X. Recycling of steel slag aggregate in portland cement concrete: An overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 282, 124447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Panda, A.P.; Mohapatra, B.; Das, S.S.; Dash, S.; Sethy, C.K. Assessment of induction furnace steel slag as a potential river sand substitute for the production of standard concrete. Struct. Concr. 2025, 26, 1111–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Benabed, B.; Azzouz, L.; Kadri, E.; Kenai, S.; Belaidi, A.S.E. Effect of fine aggregate replacement with desert dune sand on fresh properties and strength of self-compacting mortars. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2014, 28, 2182–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Menadi, B.; Kenai, S.; Khatib, J.; Ait, M.A. Strength and durability of concrete incorporating crushed limestone sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, J.L.; Yuan, K.; Xu, J.J.; Wang, Y.; Gan, D.; He, M.S. The workability and mechanical performance of fly ash cenosphere–desert sand ceramsite concrete: An experimental study and analysis. Materials 2023, 16, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Fu, Q.; Xue, G.; Xu, S.; Li, J.J.; Dong, W. Mechanical performance, microstructure, and damage model of concrete containing steel slag aggregate. Struct. Concr. 2023, 24, 2189–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saxena, S.; Tembhurkar, A.R. Impact of use of steel slag as coarse aggregate and wastewater on fresh and hardened properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 165, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Fu, R.Z.; Dong, H. Carbon nanofibers and PVA fiber hybrid concrete: Abrasion and impact resistance. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 80, 107894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luo, Z.Y.; Yang, X.H.; Ji, H.L.; Zhang, C.C. Carbonation model and prediction of polyvinyl alcohol fiber concrete with fiber length and content effects. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2022, 16, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. GB/T 50080; Standard for Test Method of Performance on Ordinary Fresh Concrete. China Building Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2016.
  44. GB/T 50081; Standard for Test Methods of Concrete Physical and Mechanical Properties. China Building Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2019.
  45. Liu, Y.H.; Li, Y.Q.; Jiang, G.H. Orthogonal experiment on performance of mortar made with dune sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 264, 120254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. GB 50010; Code for Design of Concrete Structures. China Building Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2015.
Figure 1. Grading curves of aggregates.
Figure 1. Grading curves of aggregates.
Materials 18 02956 g001
Figure 2. Range analysis results for the slump of specimens.
Figure 2. Range analysis results for the slump of specimens.
Materials 18 02956 g002
Figure 3. Range analysis results for the extensibility degree of specimens.
Figure 3. Range analysis results for the extensibility degree of specimens.
Materials 18 02956 g003
Figure 4. Range analysis results for the compressive strength of specimens: (a) RDS; (b) RSS; (c) LPVA; (d) VPVA.
Figure 4. Range analysis results for the compressive strength of specimens: (a) RDS; (b) RSS; (c) LPVA; (d) VPVA.
Materials 18 02956 g004aMaterials 18 02956 g004b
Figure 5. Range analysis results for the splitting tensile strength of specimens: (a) RDS; (b) RSS; (c) LPVA; (d) VPVA.
Figure 5. Range analysis results for the splitting tensile strength of specimens: (a) RDS; (b) RSS; (c) LPVA; (d) VPVA.
Materials 18 02956 g005
Figure 6. Range analysis results for the flexural strength of specimens: (a) RDS; (b) RSS; (c) LPVA; (d) VPVA.
Figure 6. Range analysis results for the flexural strength of specimens: (a) RDS; (b) RSS; (c) LPVA; (d) VPVA.
Materials 18 02956 g006
Table 1. Properties of ordinary Portland cement.
Table 1. Properties of ordinary Portland cement.
Cement Blaine
(m2/kg)
Water Demand
(%)
Setting Time (min.)3 d Strength (MPa)28 d Strength (MPa)
Initial SetFinal SetFlexural StrengthCompressive StrengthFlexural StrengthCompressive Strength
32027.81502106.8228.852.7
Table 2. Properties of coarse aggregates.
Table 2. Properties of coarse aggregates.
TypeMaximum Particle Size (mm)Apparent Density (kg/m3)Bulk Density (kg/m3)Crush Index (%)Needle Particle Content (%)Silt Content (%)
Natural pebble 20265014208.69.80.75
Steel slag20319022406.3-0.03
Table 3. Properties of fine aggregates.
Table 3. Properties of fine aggregates.
Sand TypeDensity (g/cm3)GradationAbsorptionAverage Grain Size (mm)Silt Content
(%)
BulkApparentFineness ModulusUniformity Coefficient
Dune sand1.561.442.1251.443.840.2180.23
River sand1.432.922.8762.923.280.6000.01
Table 4. Properties of polyvinyl alcohol fiber.
Table 4. Properties of polyvinyl alcohol fiber.
TypeEquivalent Diameter (μm)Length (mm)Density (g/cm3)Humidity Content (%)Elongation (%)Strength (MPa)Elastic Modulus (GPa)
PVA fiber15.33/9/12/181.2<0.1≤738340
Table 5. The factor levels in the orthogonal test.
Table 5. The factor levels in the orthogonal test.
LevelFactor
RDS (%)RSS (%)LPVA (mm)VPVA (%)
1103030.1
2204090.2
33050120.3
44060180.4
Table 6. Mix properties of the DS/SS-FRC.
Table 6. Mix properties of the DS/SS-FRC.
Specimens IDInfluencing FactorsMix Proportions (kg/m3)
RDS (%)RSS (%)LPVA (mm)VPVA (%)CementFly AshRiver SandDune SandSteel SlagNatural PebbleWaterHRWR
D10S30PL3V0.1103030.149555540603367842404
D10S40PL9V0.2104090.249555540604486722404
D10S50PL12V0.31050120.349555540605605602404
D10S60PL18V0.41060180.449555540606724482404
D20S30PL3V0.3203030.3495554801203367842404
D20S40PL9V0.4204090.4495554801204486722404
D20S50PL18V0.12050180.1495554801205605602404
D20S60PL12V0.22060120.2495554801206724482404
D30S30PL3V0.4303030.4495554201803367842404
D30S40PL18V0.23040180.2495554201804486722404
D30S50PL12V0.33050120.3495554201805605602404
D30S60PL9V0.1306090.1495554201806724482404
D40S30PL3V0.2403030.2495553602403367842404
D40S40PL12V0.14040120.1495553602404486722404
D40S50PL9V0.3405090.3495553602405605602404
D40S60PL18V0.44060180.4495553602406724482404
Table 7. Experimental results.
Table 7. Experimental results.
Specimens IDSlump (mm)Extensibility Degree (mm)28 d fcus (MPa)28 d ftts (MPa)28 d ftl (MPa)
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
D10S30PL3V0.120210.54208.947.91.124.610.425.720.39
D10S40PL9V0.217514.735010.556.50.975.670.387.700.44
D10S50PL12V0.31508.930014.755.41.055.860.277.490.25
D10S60PL18V0.412212.325010.143.41.244.520.336.560.37
D20S30PL3V0.314511.830513.250.90.885.460.416.820.35
D20S40PL9V0.41239.525010.559.70.945.950.198.680.41
D20S50PL18V0.115910.532011.355.11.025.310.256.440.30
D20S60PL12V0.216910.92959.851.01.335.880.377.600.51
D30S30PL3V0.41298.727010.247.51.024.620.286.480.29
D30S40PL18V0.21479.830011.549.90.894.870.256.380.34
D30S50PL12V0.313710.127512.357.00.956.030.317.440.28
D30S60PL9V0.117113.83409.254.11.105.740.376.870.42
D40S30PL3V0.216712.535010.645.10.984.530.215.990.33
D40S40PL12V0.11778.935511.551.91.035.040.396.420.38
D40S50PL9V0.314013.428014.257.61.156.010.447.680.41
D40S60PL18V0.411214.524510.541.90.864.360.366.330.29
Table 8. The results of range analysisi.
Table 8. The results of range analysisi.
LevelRangeFactor
RDS (%)RSS (%)LPVA (mm)VPVA (%)
Slump (mm)ki1162.25160.75160.75177.25
ki2149.00155.50157.25164.50
ki3146.00146.50158.25143.00
ki4144.00143.50135.00121.50
Ri18.2517.2525.7555.75
Extensibility degree (mm)ki1330.00336.25336.25358.75
ki2292.50313.75305.00323.75
ki3296.25293.75306.25290.00
ki4307.50282.50278.75253.75
Ri37.5053.7557.50105.00
28 d fcus (MPa)ki150.847.847.852.3
ki254.254.557.050.6
ki352.156.353.855.2
ki449.247.647.648.2
Ri5.008.709.407.00
28 d ftts (MPa)ki15.174.814.845.18
ki25.655.395.855.24
ki35.325.805.705.84
ki44.995.124.774.86
Ri0.660.991.080.98
28 d ftl (MPa)ki16.876.256.296.36
ki27.397.307.736.92
ki36.797.267.247.36
ki46.606.846.437.01
Ri0.791.051.441.00
Table 9. Fitting formulas for compressive strength of DS/SS-FRC.
Table 9. Fitting formulas for compressive strength of DS/SS-FRC.
Method of FittingFitting FormulaCorrelation Coefficient
Logarithmic fitting9.35lnx + 18.960.998
Linear fitting0.33x + 34.640.805
Quadratic polynomial fitting−0.006x2 + 0.90x + 28.970.960
Exponential fitting24.65x0.200.973
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, S.; Ren, Q.; Li, T. Workability and Mechanical Properties of PVA Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with Hybrid Dune Sand and Steel Slag Aggregates. Materials 2025, 18, 2956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18132956

AMA Style

Liu Y, Wang X, Jiang S, Ren Q, Li T. Workability and Mechanical Properties of PVA Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with Hybrid Dune Sand and Steel Slag Aggregates. Materials. 2025; 18(13):2956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18132956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yanhua, Xirui Wang, Senyan Jiang, Qingxin Ren, and Tong Li. 2025. "Workability and Mechanical Properties of PVA Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with Hybrid Dune Sand and Steel Slag Aggregates" Materials 18, no. 13: 2956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18132956

APA Style

Liu, Y., Wang, X., Jiang, S., Ren, Q., & Li, T. (2025). Workability and Mechanical Properties of PVA Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with Hybrid Dune Sand and Steel Slag Aggregates. Materials, 18(13), 2956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18132956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop