Next Article in Journal
In Situ Phase Separation Strategy to Construct Zinc Oxide Dots-Modified Vanadium Nitride Flower-like Heterojunctions as an Efficient Sulfur Nanoreactor for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Laser Parameters on Through-Thickness Local Hardness of Polypropylene Plates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spontaneous and Piezo Polarization Versus Polar Surfaces: Fundamentals and Ab Initio Calculations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electronic Correlations in Altermagnet MnTe in Hexagonal Crystal Structure

by
Evgenii D. Chernov
and
Alexey V. Lukoyanov
*
M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 620108 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(11), 2637; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112637
Submission received: 19 April 2025 / Revised: 22 May 2025 / Accepted: 31 May 2025 / Published: 4 June 2025

Abstract

:
In this article, we present the results of the first-principles study of altermagnet MnTe crystallized in the hexagonal-type crystal structure. Our theoretical calculations have been performed within density functional theory (DFT) and demonstrated that the altermagnetic phase of MnTe has the lowest total energy corresponding to the stable ground state. The calculations carried out accounting for electronic correlations in DFT+U resulted in significant changes in the electronic structure, as well as magnetic properties of altermagnet MnTe and the increased bandgap. In additional calculations with spin-orbit coupling and electronic correlations (DFT+U+SO), we showed that the bandgap is less than in the DFT+U calculations, but the electronic structure did not change noticeably. In addition, the investigated pressure effects for the compound under study revealed an insulator to metal transition under pressure for the hexagonal-type crystal structure. An experimental finding of a metallic state can be complicated by structural transitions into other phases, not considered in our study, which can occur at high pressures. Experimental measurements for MnTe above 40 GPa are required.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the novel phenomenon altermagnetism attracted the attention of the scientific community. Altermagnetic materials are a new class of magnetic compounds in addition to common magnetic phases such as ferromagnets, antiferromagnets and others [1,2]. Ferromagnetic materials have spin-split energy bands because of the broken time-reversal ( T ) symmetry. Collinear antiferromagnetic materials have spin-degenerate energy bands due to the antiparallel configuration of magnetic moments and zero net magnetization. Altermagnetic compounds combine the advantages of both ferromagnets and antiferromagnets, namely, they are characterized by compensated antiparallel magnetic order, spin splittings, electronic structure of compounds with broken time-reversal ( T ) symmetry, magneto-optical effects, anomalous Hall effect and tunnel magnetoresistance [3,4]. It is important to note that such properties are possible due to specific crystal and magnetic structures of altermagnetic compounds [5,6]. Altermagnetics are candidates to be used in spintronic, magnetic, and memory devices [5,7,8]. Some popular compounds among altermagnets, as well as those firstly studied are RuO2 [9,10], FeF2 [11], MnF2 [12], among others. Recently, altermagnets were proposed among organic compounds such as k-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl [13].
Among the variety of altermagnetic materials, the hexagonal manganese telluride MnTe is of particular interest. MnTe belongs to the class of transition metal chalcogenides (TMC), which are of great interest coming because of their remarkable properties [14,15,16]. In particular, they have potential for thermoelectric devices [17]. Various works are dedicated to research of pressure on crystal structure, magnetic and other properties of TMCs such as MnS and MnSe [18,19,20]. It is known that MnS and MnSe have several crystal phases of which the rock salt (RS) phase is the most energetically preferable [21]. In recent work, it was shown that RS-MnS has a phase transition under pressure. RS-MnS transit into a orthorhombic phase B31 at 24.3 GPa till 33.6 GPa accompanied by a volume collapse of 22% [22].
Unlike MnS and MnSe compounds, MnTe has the hexagonal structure of NiAs (space group P 6 3 / m m c ) and there is no research that demonstrates the influence of pressure to MnTe, apart from pressures to 40 GPa reporting an insulating characteristics and a distorted phase for powder [23] and polycrystalline [24] MnTe samples. Combining all of the above properties, the altermagnetic MnTe is of particular interest. Altermagnetic MnTe is known to be a p-type semiconductor with a bandgap width of 1.27–1.46 eV and a magnetic ordering below the Néel temperature TN = 307–310 K [25] with magnetic moment of 4.7–5.0 μ B [26]. In theoretical calculations [5,15,27,28,29,30,31,32], the bandgap was underestimated. Recently, the existence of the altermagnetic ordering in MnTe was demonstrated by revealing an altermagnetic band splitting in the Brillouin zone, which is present even in the absence of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) [3,5,15]. Because of this, further studies of MnTe are required to understand its properties and potential applications.
In this paper, we performed a first-principles theoretical study employing DFT+U to reveal the electronic structure and magnetic properties of the altermagnet MnTe with different unit cell volumes and demonstrate an insulator-metal transition under pressure. The motivation of our work is to demonstrate the importance of taking into account electronic correlations for the reproducing of the MnTe bandgap because a usual DFT calculation cannot reproduce the experimental value of the bandgap in this insulator.

2. Methods and Crystal Structure

The altermagnetic MnTe crystallizes in the hexagonal P 6 3 / m m c crystal structure (space group number 194) [15]. The crystal structure is plotted in Figure 1. The manganese Mn1 and Mn2 ions correspond to different directions of magnetic moments shown as arrows. In order to compare different types of antiferromagnetic ordering in MnTe, we increased the size of the cell along the b direction and selected a spin ordering presented in Figure 1. Our cell contains 4 Mn and 4 Te atoms. The cell parameters are: a = 4.21 Å; b = 8.42 Å; c = 6.70 Å and α = β = 90°; γ = 120° [33]. The crystal structure of MnTe was plotted in VESTA [34]. The investigations were performed within density functional theory (DFT) methods. In this type of calculations, temperature is not explicitly present as a parameter, while it characterizes the crystal structure parameters taken. To take into account electronic correlations, the DFT+U method was used with Coulomb parameter varied from 3 to 6.9 eV, the exchange parameter equals to J = 0.86 eV [20,35]. The Hubbard U and exchange parameter are applied for the Mn 3d states. The electron-ion interaction pseudopotential was based on the projector augmented wave method and the exchange–correlation functional was chosen in the GGA-PBE form [36]. The calculations with spin-orbit coupling were performed with U = 6.9 eV and J = 0.86 eV with non-collinear antiparallel orderings of the Mn magnetic moments in the xy-plane. The cutoff energy was set as 520 eV and the k-grid mesh was 8 × 16 × 8 points. The calculations were performed in VASP package ver. 5.4 [37,38].

3. Results

First, we performed calculations with different types of antiferromagnetic orderings. A comparison of total energies showed that the altermagnetic ordering presented in Figure 1 has the lowest total energy. After this we performed a relaxation calculation of crystal structure to take into account the altermagnetic spin ordering. Figure 2 presents the electronic structure in the GGA approximation. The Mn1 ions the spin up projection is occupied, Mn2–the spin down channel is occupied. It can be observed that MnTe exhibits a semiconductor bandgap width of 0.2 eV. In the valence part of the electronic states, several 3d Mn peaks are observed at −4, −3.2 and −2.9 eV. Also, several 3d Mn peaks are placed in the conduction part of the electronic states at 0.6, 1.0 and 1.2 eV. These results are in good agreement with the previous theoretical calculations [39,40].
Figure 3a demonstrates the band structure in the L’– Γ –L–A– Γ –M–K–H–A direction of MnTe in the GGA approximation. Also the MnTe Brillouin zone with the direction of the bypass high-symmetry points is demonstrated in Figure 3b. The red lines indicate the spin up projection, blue dot lines–the spin down projection. It is seen, that bands in the spin up and down projections are matched in the direct L–A– Γ –M–K–H–A intervals, which indicates antiferromagnetic nature. But a spin splitting as a result of the broken time-reversal symmetry ( T ) is observed in the reverse L’– Γ –L direction. For this reason, the spin up and spin down projections are mirrored but indicate the ferromagnetic nature. All these facts confirm that MnTe exhibits altermagnetic properties.The bandgap width is equal to 0.2 eV due to the presence of states in the vicinity of the Fermi level at L’, L and A high-symmetry points. In turn, at the other high-symmetry points, such as Γ , the direct energy gap width is 1 eV. Also the bandgap width achieves 1.75 eV at the H point.
Further, electronic correlations in the Mn 3d shell with Hubbard U = 3 eV were taken into account. As a result of accounting for electronic correlations, the bandgap width increased to 0.9 eV (see Figure 4) due to the shift of the 3d Mn states in the valence part of the electronic states to the lower energies.
Now, the 3d Mn states have intense peaks at −4.1, −4.5 and −5.0 eV. In its turn, the electronic correlations also influence the 3d Mn states in the conduction band which are shifted to the higher energies. The electronic correlations have weak effect on the Te 5p states. Most Te states are not transferred; however, the Te states hybridized with the Mn ones are moved to the lower energies in the valence band.
After increasing the U value up to 6.9 eV, the bandgap width is increased slightly in comparison with U = 3 eV, see Figure 5. The Mn 3d states separated from the Te 5p ones in the valence band form a gap between −5.8 and −5.2 eV. And now the Mn 3d states are located between −5.8 and −6.6 eV with the higher peak intensity than in the previous calculation. This means that the main part of the Mn 3d states in the valence band is shifted to an area of −5.8 to −6.6 eV. In addition, a small part of the Te 5p hybridized states is shifted together with the Mn 3d states. The obtained DOS is in good agreement with the experimental photoemission spectra [41] where the occupied states are found just below 0 and a pronounced peak between −7 and −6 eV. The Mn 3d of the conduction part are moved by 1 eV to the above energies. This leads to the bandgap width increase because these states are found above 1.25 eV in the conduction part; notable, the Te 5p limit the bandgap in the valence band. The position of these states is also in agreement with the experimental photoemission spectra [41] having the main contribution of the Mn states between 3 and 4 eV.
The band structure also undergoes significant changes; see Figure 6. The bandgap width in the L’– Γ –L direction increases to 1.5 eV, whereas the energy gap width is 2 eV in the Γ point. An indirect gap also exists along the L–K path.
Also, we performed calculations taking for account spin-orbit coupling together with Coulomb parameter equal to 6.9 eV, see Figure 6. Taking SOC into account does not result in noticeable changes in the states, and the bandgap decreases slightly by 0.2 eV. This effect is comparable with a bandgap change of 0.12 eV when the exchange-correlation functional LSDA is replaced by GGA-PBE in the calculations. The energy of SOC for the Mn ions is equal to −0.008 eV, and for the Te ions it is −0.189 eV. It is clear that the Te SOC energy is much higher than the Mn SOC energy.
In addition, in this work, modeling of the unit cell compression of MnTe was realized by reducing the lattice volume and keeping the ratio of the lattice parameters with the electronic correlations taken into account. The compression was considered without taking into account possible crystal structure transitions. Then the result of the calculations for a volume of 70% of the initial volume (i.e., the volume under normal conditions) is presented in Figure 7. As a result of the applied pressure, the narrow peaks of manganese are broadened. The intensity of the Mn peaks is also noticeably decreased. The bandgap is reduced to 0.4 eV due to the above changes and the shift of the Mn states. These results are in agreement with the available results that report insulating characteristics up to 40 GPa [23,24]. It might be expected that above this pressure a metallic phase can be found.
With a further decrease of volume to 50% (see Figure 8) of the initial volume, the gap is closed and an insulator-metal transition occurs. The intensities of the Mn 3d states decrease significantly, and the Mn 3d–Te 5p states strong hybridization is observed. The band structure presented in Figure 9 overlaps at the point Γ at the Fermi level with a large altermagnetic spin splitting.
During our investigation of the pressure effects on the electronic structure, as well as magnetic properties, of altermagnetic MnTe, bulk modulus B0 was also calculated. The Birch-Murnaghan equation of states was also obtained and plotted, see Figure 10. In order to compress MnTe by 15% (160.1 Å), a pressure of 27.5 GPa is required. A pressure of 47.8 GPa results in a volume reduction of 25% (141.3 Å). And a pressure of 177.6 GPa is required to compress MnTe by 50% (94.21 Å). The B0 value was calculated as 53.7 GPa and B’0 = 3.54. The bulk modulus of MnTe was previously theoretically calculated as 17.54–50.84 GPa and B’0 ranging between 3.85–5.83 for different parameters [42], which shows reasonable agreement with our calculated results.
Because MnTe exhibits altermagnetic properties, the total magnetic moment for it is equal to zero Bohr magnetons, as the magnetic moment of the Te ions. However, the Mn magnetic moment has a high value in all our computational methods; see Figure 11. Thus, the Mn magnetic moment is equal to 3.98 μ B in the GGA calculation. As the Coulomb parameter increases to 3.0 eV, the magnetic moment of manganese increases to 4.37 μ B . At the maximum value of the Coulomb parameter 6.9 eV [20,35], the Mn magnetic moment reaches 4.6 μ B , which is characteristic for the high spin state. The Mn magnetic moment in the case of a calculation with SOC is equal to 4.5 μ B . Furthermore, with a decrease in the volume of the MnTe cell, the Mn magnetic moment decreases. Under compression, the energy bands expand, and as a result, the magnetic moment on Mn decreases. When volume of 50% is reached (with the Mn magnetic moment of 2.26 μ B ), a transition into a low spin state is finished.

4. Conclusions

We studied the electronic structure and magnetic properties of altermagnetic MnTe taking into account electronic correlations. In addition, we investigated the effects of pressure on the electronic structure and magnetic properties of the compound under study. It is shown as Coulomb parameter increases, the bandgap width is increasing to 1.25 eV. This value is close to the experimental one. Also as Coulomb parameter increases, Mn magnetic moments are growing to 4.6 μ B . Our calculations taking into account the spin-orbit coupling show a decrease of the bandgap to 0.68 eV in comparison with the LSDA calculations and the Mn moment to 4.5 μ B . We have demonstrated that it is not necessary to take SOC into account in order to reproduce the altermagnetic properties. The volume compression of the cell leads to a gradual decrease in the Mn magnetic moment with a decrease in the volume of the cell, resulting in a transition from a high-spin state to a low-spin one. When 60% of the volume under normal conditions is reached, an insulator-metal transition occurs, as a result of which the energy gap closes, and when 50% of the volume under normal conditions is reached, the magnetic moment of manganese decreases to 2.26 μ B , but altermagnetic spin splitting is present. Furthermore, in the course of our study, the values of the bulk modules B0 and B’0 were calculated. Our results motivate further experimental studies of altermagnetic MnTe above 40 GPa.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.L.; methodology, E.D.C. and A.V.L.; software, E.D.C.; validation, A.V.L.; investigation, E.D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, E.D.C.; writing—review and editing, A.V.L.; supervision, A.V.L.; project administration, E.D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for the IMP UrB RAS. E. D. Chernov thanks M. N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics UrB RAS for supporting his work within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation on the theme “Electron” (No. 122021000039-4), which was carried out within the framework of the IMP UrB RAS project No. 10-23/mol.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TMCTransition metal chalcogenides
DFTDensity functional theory
RSRock salt
SOCSpin-orbit coupling
LSDALocal spin-density approximation
GGAGeneralized gradient approximation

References

  1. Amin, O.J.; Dal Din, A.; Golias, E.; Niu, Y.; Zakharov, A.; Fromage, S.C.; Fields, C.J.B.; Heywood, S.L.; Cousins, R.B.; Maccherozzi, F.; et al. Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in MnTe. Nature 2024, 636, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Krempaský, J.; Šmejkal, L.; D’Souza, S.W.; Hajlaoui, M.; Springholz, G.; Uhlířová, K.; Alarab, F.; Constantinou, P.C.; Strocov, V.; Usanov, D.; et al. Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy. Nature 2024, 626, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Šmejkal, L.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. X 2022, 12, 040501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gonzalez Betancourt, R.D.; Zubáč, J.; Geishendorf, K.; Ritzinger, P.; Růžičková, B.; Kotte, T.; Železný, J.; Olejník, K.; Springholz, G.; Büchner, B.; et al. Anisotropic magnetoresistance in altermagnetic MnTe. Npj Spintron. 2024, 2, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Šmejkal, L.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry. Phys. Rev. X 2022, 12, 031042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McClarty, P.A.; Rau, J.G. Landau Theory of Altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 176702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chowde Gowda, C.; Chandravanshi, D.; Tromer, R.M.; Malya, A.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Galvão, D.S.; Tiwary, C.S. Tuning the band gap of manganese telluride quantum dots (MnTe QDs) for photocatalysis. Appl. Phys. A 2024, 130, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Raju Baral, A.M.; Abeykoon, M.; Campbell, B.J.; Frandsen, B.A. Giant Spontaneous Magnetostriction in MnTe Driven by a Novel Magnetostructural Coupling Mechanism. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2305247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Šmejkal, L.; González-Hernández, R.; Jungwirth, T.; Sinova, J. Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz8809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. González-Hernández, R.; Šmejkal, L.; Výborný, K.; Yahagi, Y.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T.; Železný, J. Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 127701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. López-Moreno, S.; Romero, A.H.; Mejía-López, J.; Munoz, A.; Roshchin, I.V. First-principles study of electronic, vibrational, elastic, and magnetic properties of FeF as a function of pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 134110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, L.-D.; Wang, Z.; Luo, J.-W.; Rashba, E.I.; Zunger, A. Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 102, 014422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Iguchi, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Ikemoto, Y.; Furukawa, T.; Itoh, H.; Iwai, S.; Moriwaki, T.; Sasaki, T. Magnetooptical spectra of an organic antiferromagnet as a candidate for an altermagnet. Phys. Rev. Res. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Woods-Robinson, R.; Han, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ablekim, T.; Khan, I.; Persson, K.A.; Zakutayev, A. Wide Band Gap Chalcogenide Semiconductors. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Osumi, T.; Souma, S.; Aoyama, T.; Yamauchi, K.; Honma, A.; Nakayama, K.; Takahashi, T.; Ohgushi, K.; Sato, T. Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic MnTe. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 115102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barik, R.; Ingole, P.P. Challenges and prospects of metal sulfide materials for supercapacitors. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 21, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, Z.F.; Song, J.; Li, K.; Tahir, M.; Wang, Y.T.; Pan, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Zou, J.J. Hollow Cobalt-Based Bimetallic Sulfide Polyhedra for Efficient All-pH-Value Electrochemical and Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Caetano, R.; Freire, H. Orbital selectivity versus Pomeranchuk instability in the iron–chalcogenide superconductors: A two-loop renormalization group study. Ann. Phys. 2019, 405, 308–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dyachenko, A.A.; Lukoyanov, A.V.; Shorikov, A.O.; Anisimov, V.I. Magnetically driven phase transitions with a large volume collapse in MnSe under pressure: A DFT+DMFT study. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 085139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chernov, E.D.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Metal-insulator transition in MnS. Phys. Scr. 2025, 100, 035903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Bai, L.; Wen, T.; Yang, L.; Gou, H.; Xiao, Y.; Chow, P.; Pravica, M.; Yang, W.; Zhao, Y. Giant Pressure-Driven Lattice Collapse Coupled with Intermetallic Bonding and Spin-State Transition in Manganese Chalcogenides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Allen, J.W.; Lucovsky, G.; Mikkelsen, J.C., Jr. Optical properties and electronic structure of crossroads material MnTe. Solid State Commun. 1977, 24, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mimasaka, M.; Sakamoto, I.; Murata, K.; Fujii, Y.; Onodera, A. Pressure-induced phase transitions of MnTe. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1987, 20, 4689–4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, P.; Zhu, S.C.; Zou, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Zhu, J.; Wu, L.; Wang, S.; et al. Concurrent pressure-induced spin-state transitions and Jahn–Teller distortions in MnTe. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 3931–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiao, G.; Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, K.; Huang, X.; Ding, Z.; Ma, Y.; Zou, G.; Zou, B. A Protocol to fabricate nanostructured new phase: B31-Type MnS synthesized under high pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10297–10303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kriegner, D.; Reichlova, H.; Grenzer, J.; Schmidt, W.; Ressouche, E.; Godinho, J.; Wagner, T.; Martin, S.Y.; Shick, A.B.; Volobuev, V.V.; et al. Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal MnTe. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 214418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sattigeri, R.M.; Cuono, G.; Autieri, C. Altermagnetic surface states: Towards the observation and utilization of altermagnetism in thin films, interfaces and topological materials. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 16998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zulkifal, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Siddique, S.; Yu, Y.; Wang, C.; Gong, Y.; Li, S.; Li, D.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Multiple Valence Bands Convergence and Localized Lattice Engineering Lead to Superhigh Thermoelectric Figure of Merit in MnTe. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2206342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Devaraj, N.; Bose, A.; Narayan, A. Interplay of altermagnetism and pressure in hexagonal and orthorhombic MnTe. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2024, 8, 104407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Faria Junior, P.E.; de Mare, K.A.; Zollner, K.; Ahn, K.; Erlingsson, S.I.; van Schilfgaarde, M.; Výborný, K. Sensitivity of the MnTe valence band to the orientation of magnetic moments. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, L100417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deng, H.; Lou, X.; Lu, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, D.; Li, S.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, D.; et al. High-performance eco-friendly MnTe thermoelectrics through introducing SnTe nanocrystals and manipulating band structure. Nano Energy 2021, 81, 105649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rooj, S.; Chakraborty, J.; Ganguli, N. Hexagonal MnTe with Antiferromagnetic Spin Splitting and Hidden Rashba–Dresselhaus Interaction for Antiferromagnetic Spintronics. Adv. Phys. Res. 2024, 3, 2300050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Makovetskii, G.; Galyas, A.; Severin, G.; Yanushkevich, K.I. Synthesis of Solid Solutions of Cr1-xMnxTe (0 ≤ x ≤ 1). Inorg. Mater. 1996, 32, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, Volumetric and Morphology Data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kuneš, J.; Lukoyanov, A.V.; Anisimov, V.I.; Scalettar, R.T.; Pickett, W.E. Collapse of magnetic moment drives the Mott transition in MnO. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sandratskii, L.M.; Egorov, R.F.; Berdyshev, A.A. Energy Band Structure and Electronic Properties of NiAs Type Compounds. II. Antiferromagnetic Manganese Telluride. Phys. Status Solidi 1981, 104, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiong, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Yin, L.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, Q.; Wang, P.; et al. Lattice Distortions and Multiple Valence Band Convergence Contributing to High Thermoelectric Performance in MnTe. Small 2022, 19, 2206058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sato, H.; Mihara, T.; Furuta, A.; Tamura, M.; Mimura, K.; Happo, N.; Taniguchi, M.; Ueda, Y. Chemical trend of occupied and unoccupied Mn 3d states in Mn Y (Y= S, Se, Te). Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, 7222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Krause, M.; Bechstedt, F. Structural and Magnetic Properties of MnTe Phases from Ab Initio Calculations. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2013, 26, 1963–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The motif of crystal structure of MnTe. (b) The crystal structure of MnTe in yz-plane. Mn1 atoms are purple, Mn2 atoms–green, Te atoms–yellow. Arrows correspond to directions of magnetic moments.
Figure 1. (a) The motif of crystal structure of MnTe. (b) The crystal structure of MnTe in yz-plane. Mn1 atoms are purple, Mn2 atoms–green, Te atoms–yellow. Arrows correspond to directions of magnetic moments.
Materials 18 02637 g001
Figure 2. The density of electronic states of MnTe in the GGA approximation relative to the Fermi energy at zero energy (the dotted line).
Figure 2. The density of electronic states of MnTe in the GGA approximation relative to the Fermi energy at zero energy (the dotted line).
Materials 18 02637 g002
Figure 3. (a) The band structure of MnTe in the GGA approximation. (b) The Brillouin zone of MnTe with high-symmetry points denoted by green dots.
Figure 3. (a) The band structure of MnTe in the GGA approximation. (b) The Brillouin zone of MnTe with high-symmetry points denoted by green dots.
Materials 18 02637 g003
Figure 4. The density of electronic states of MnTe in DFT+U for U = 3 eV.
Figure 4. The density of electronic states of MnTe in DFT+U for U = 3 eV.
Materials 18 02637 g004
Figure 5. The density of electronic states of MnTe in the framework of the DFT+U method for U = 6.9 eV.
Figure 5. The density of electronic states of MnTe in the framework of the DFT+U method for U = 6.9 eV.
Materials 18 02637 g005
Figure 6. The band structure of MnTe in DFT+U for U = 6.9 eV (red and blue stripes) and with taking for account spin-orbit coupling (black stripes).
Figure 6. The band structure of MnTe in DFT+U for U = 6.9 eV (red and blue stripes) and with taking for account spin-orbit coupling (black stripes).
Materials 18 02637 g006
Figure 7. The density of electronic states of MnTe in DFT+U for U = 6.9 eV and with a volume of 70% of the volume under normal conditions.
Figure 7. The density of electronic states of MnTe in DFT+U for U = 6.9 eV and with a volume of 70% of the volume under normal conditions.
Materials 18 02637 g007
Figure 8. The density of electronic states of MnTe in DFT+U for U = 6.9 eV and with a volume of 50% of the initial volume under normal conditions.
Figure 8. The density of electronic states of MnTe in DFT+U for U = 6.9 eV and with a volume of 50% of the initial volume under normal conditions.
Materials 18 02637 g008
Figure 9. The band structure of MnTe in DFT+U at U = 6.9 eV and with a volume of 50% of the normal conditions volume.
Figure 9. The band structure of MnTe in DFT+U at U = 6.9 eV and with a volume of 50% of the normal conditions volume.
Materials 18 02637 g009
Figure 10. The curve of equation of states for MnTe.
Figure 10. The curve of equation of states for MnTe.
Materials 18 02637 g010
Figure 11. The Mn magnetic moments in MnTe depending on a calculation method and volume at U = 6.9 eV.
Figure 11. The Mn magnetic moments in MnTe depending on a calculation method and volume at U = 6.9 eV.
Materials 18 02637 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chernov, E.D.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Electronic Correlations in Altermagnet MnTe in Hexagonal Crystal Structure. Materials 2025, 18, 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112637

AMA Style

Chernov ED, Lukoyanov AV. Electronic Correlations in Altermagnet MnTe in Hexagonal Crystal Structure. Materials. 2025; 18(11):2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112637

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chernov, Evgenii D., and Alexey V. Lukoyanov. 2025. "Electronic Correlations in Altermagnet MnTe in Hexagonal Crystal Structure" Materials 18, no. 11: 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112637

APA Style

Chernov, E. D., & Lukoyanov, A. V. (2025). Electronic Correlations in Altermagnet MnTe in Hexagonal Crystal Structure. Materials, 18(11), 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112637

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop