Next Article in Journal
4H-SiC MOSFET Threshold Voltage Instability Evaluated via Pulsed High-Temperature Reverse Bias and Negative Gate Bias Stresses
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Refinement and Optoelectrical Properties of Nd2Ru2O7 and Gd2Ru2O7 Pyrochlore Oxides for Photovoltaic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Interfacial Corrosion Behavior of Hybrid Laminate EN AW-6082 ∪ CFRP
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Lanthanide Effect on Functional Properties of 0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3 Ceramic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 8
10.3390/ma17081905
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetoelectric Properties of Multiferroic Composites Based on BaTiO3 and Nickel-Zinc Ferrite Material

by
Dariusz Bochenek
1,*,
Przemysław Niemiec
1,
Dagmara Brzezińska
1,
Grzegorz Dercz
1,
Grzegorz Ziółkowski
1,
Elżbieta Jartych
2,
Jakub Grotel
2 and
Jan Suchanicz
3
1
Institute of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, 75 Pułku Piechoty 1a, 41-500 Chorzów, Poland
2
Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Lublin University of Technology, 38A Nadbystrzycka Str., 20-618 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Power Engineering and Automations, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 120, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(8), 1905; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081905
Submission received: 26 March 2024 / Revised: 12 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 19 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functionalized Ceramics and Their Composites: Preparation, Properties and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The purpose of the present study was to learn the morphological, structural, ferroelectric, dielectric, electromechanical, magnetoelectric, and magnetic properties, and DC conductivity of BaTiO3-Ni0.64Zn0.36Fe2O4 (BT-F) multiferroic composites compacted via the free sintering method. The influence of the ferrite content in ceramic composite materials on the functional properties is investigated and discussed. X-ray diffraction studies confirmed the presence of two main phases of the composite, with strong reflections originating from BaTiO3 and weak peaks originating from nickel-zinc ferrite. BT-F ceramic composites have been shown to exhibit multiferroism at room temperature. All studied compositions have high permittivity values and low dielectric loss, while the ferroelectric properties of the BT component are maintained at a high level. On the other hand, magnetic properties depend on the amount of the ferrite phase and are the strongest for the composition with 15 wt.% of F (magnetization at RT is 4.12 emu/g). The magnetoelectric coupling between BT and F phases confirmed by the lock-in technique is the largest for 15 wt.% ferrite. In the present work, the process conditions of the free sintering method for obtaining BT-F multiferroic composite with good electrical and magnetic properties (in one material) were optimized. An improved set of multifunctional properties allows the expansion of the possibilities of using multiferroic composites in microelectronics.

1. Introduction

The demand for new materials with newer and functional properties is constantly increasing. Thus, engineering materials must have versatile and stable properties to ensure their wide application possibilities. The great interest in multiferroic materials in recent years is due to their useful functional properties, such as magnetization in the electric field and polarization in the magnetic field [1,2,3,4]. Magnetoelectric multiferroics show both magnetic and ferroelectric order and magnetoelectric coupling, and both magnetic and electric subsystems. Such properties can be used in, e.g., actuators and sensors, microwave phase shifters, magneto-electric transducers, magnetic recording read heads and random access memories, magnetic field probes, and capacitive-inductive passive filters for communications [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
Achieving multiferroic properties in a single phase is difficult and rare, and such materials exhibit poor functional properties [8,9,13]. A much more effective way to obtain the appropriate multiferroic properties is to combine materials with different properties into composite structures in the form of a thin layer, laminate, and bulk [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Magnetoelectric multiferroic composites are designed by combining the piezoelectric properties of ferroelectric materials and magnetostriction of ferromagnetic ones [9,13,15,20,21,22]. The multiferroic system response arises from the capacitance change in ferroelectric material due to strain induced as a result of the action of an external magnetic field and the other way around [23,24,25]. Although none of the constituent phases show a magnetoelectric coupling in such composite systems, cross-interactions cause this effect [5]. Based on assumptions proposed by Van den Boomgaard and Born [26], multiferroic composites with soft properties can be appropriately designed by controlling the microstructural characteristics (grain size, shape, volume fraction, and connectivity of the constituents). To obtain multiferroic composites, ferroelectric materials with high dielectric, ferroelectric, and piezoelectric parameters are often used with modified compositions from the BaTiO3 or PZT families, Pb[ZrxTi1−x]O3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1). As a magnetic component, ferrites are most often used in composite systems, e.g., nickel–zinc [27,28,29], nickel–cobalt [30], cobalt–zinc [31], manganese–zinc [32], nickel–zinc–copper [33]. To obtain multiferroic composite materials, complex technological processes are used, taking advantage of various techniques and methods of sintering, e.g., free sintering (pressureless sintering) [34,35], hot pressing [36], microwave sintering [37], spark plasma sintering SPS [38,39,40], and cold-sintering-assisted sintering CSS [41,42]. In recent years, novel unsintered methods for obtaining composite materials in various forms have also been successfully proposed, such as binary mixed fluids [43] and phosphate bonding [44]. Each of the methods mentioned above has many advantages and disadvantages. Not every technological process can effectively optimize the conditions for obtaining a multiferroic composite material with the desired properties. Since the free sintering method is still the most economical, this method was used in the technological process of the present work.
Introducing a magnetic component (e.g., ferrite) into the composite causes a deterioration of the final functional properties, including ferroelectric and dielectric properties and increased electrical conductivity. High electrical conductivity causes a problem during the poling process, making it difficult to obtain high piezoelectric properties. On the other hand, previous studies on the functional properties and magnetoelectric coupling of multiferroic composites have shown that a more significant amount of the magnetic phase in the composition of the multiferroic composite allows for obtaining a higher magnetoelectric effect, e.g., [45,46]. In order to obtain high magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroic ferrite composites, many factors must be met, among others, namely high piezoelectric properties (ferroelectric phase) and high values of the magnetostriction coefficient (ferro/ferrimagnetic phase), and both phases must be in equilibrium, the mechanical contact between ferroelectric and ferro/ferrimagnetic grains must be perfect, etc. [45]. All the problems mentioned above make it necessary to look for an inevitable compromise, which includes using a predominant amount of the ferroelectric phase when designing a multiferroic composite’s composition. Thus, multiferroic composite materials with a lower magnetoelectric effect but a more favorable set of functional parameters are obtained. Additionally, not all composites made of ferroelectric and magnetic materials can achieve the expected and satisfactory results.
In our study, three BT-F multiferroic composites based on BaTiO3 (BT) and Ni0.64Zn0.36Fe2O4 ferrite (F) with different ferrite content, i.e., 5, 10, and 15 wt.% of F, were obtained via the free sintering method. Perovskite BaTiO3 was the first polycrystalline ceramic material discovered that exhibited ferroelectricity [47]. Research on BT was conducted in the 1950s, and barium titanate was considered a valuable material for piezoelectric transducer applications [48]. BT has excellent physical properties, i.e., high permittivity values, low dielectric losses, a sharp phase transition (ferroelectric/paraelectric) at 120 °C, and good piezoelectric properties. The nickel–zinc ferrite was chosen due to its relatively high resistivity at RT, high Curie transition temperature, magnetic nature, and good magnetization nature [49].
The main goal of the work was to obtain, via the free sintering method, multiferroic composites from a combination of ferroelectric (BT) and magnetic (nickel–zinc ferrite) materials exhibiting good magnetic and electrical properties as well as magnetoelectric coupling. We report the structure, morphology, dielectric, ferroelectric, electromechanical, magnetic, and magnetoelectric properties, and DC conductivity of the BaTiO3–ferrite multiferroic composite. The influence of ferrite amount on the multiferroic composite’s functional properties is described. The presented study demonstrates the possibility of obtaining ceramic composites with multifunctional properties using the classical sintering method (free sintering), which is the cheapest, most common, and most appropriate method for the serial production of samples. The free sintering maintains high dielectric and ferroelectric properties and appropriate magnetic and magnetoelectric properties in one composite material. Ensuring the minimum product size is essential and desirable in microelectronic and microelectronic applications.

2. Materials and Methods

The (1−x)(BaTiO3)–x(Ni0.64Zn0.36Fe2O4) multiferroic composites (denoted as BT-F, for x = 0.05, 0.1 and, 0.15) were sintered via the free sintering (pressureless) method. Ferroelectric BaTiO3 material constitutes the matrix of the composite compounds, while nickel–zinc ferrite is the magnetic phase. Three compositions of the BT-F multiferroic composite were obtained with ferrite content of 5, 10, and 15 wt.%. The composite samples for which the further results will be presented are marked as follows: 85BT-F, 90BT-F, and 95BT-F.

2.1. Technology Process

In the technological process, commercial BaTiO3 powder (99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as the ferroelectric component. The starting powder was calcined at 1350 °C/5 h in order to increase its sinterability. After this, BaTiO3 powder was crushed and ground for 24 h in a planetary ball mill (Fritsch Pulverisette 6, Idar-Oberstein, Germany). A SEM image of the BaTiO3 powder is provided in the Supplementary Materials in Figure S1. In the case of the magnetic component, simple oxides were used, i.e., Fe2O3, NiO, and ZnO (99.99%, POCH, Gliwice, Poland). The powders weighed in the stoichiometric proportion were mixed for 24 h in the planetary ball mill (Fritsch Pulverisette 6, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) and calcined at 1000 °C/4 h to obtain synthesized ferrite powder, Ni0.64Zn0.36Fe2O4. A SEM image of the ferrite powder is provided in the Supplementary Materials in Figure S2.
To prepare three different compositions of BT-F, the powders were weighed in the appropriate proportion and milled in a planetary ball mill for 24 h (Fritsch Pulverisette 6, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) using the wet method. At each stage of the technological process, zirconium-yttrium balls (with a diameter of 10 mm) and ethyl alcohol were used, and the following powder grinding conditions: time—24 h, velocity—250 rpm, the ball/powder weight ratio was 2/1, and a polyamide jar was used. Next, the multiferroic composite powders were calcined at 1050 °C for 4 h, ground again, and pressed into pellets on a hydraulic press (at a pressure of 300 MPa). In the last stage of the technological process, the composite samples were sintered via the free sintering method (pressureless) at 1250 °C/4 h.

2.2. Measurements Methods

A Philips X’Pert diffractometer (Panalytical, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) was used to register the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the multiferroic materials at room temperature (RT). Measurements were carried out in the 2 theta angular range from 15° to 100°, while the analysis of the results was conducted based on the ICDD PDF-4 database. The morphology microstructure of the composite sample (along with the cross-section sample) was observed using the high-resolution scanning electron microscope SEM, JSM-7100F TTL LV (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Detailed studies of SEM, EPMA (electron probe microanalysis), and EDS (energy dispersive spectrometry) were carried out. The Archimedes method was used to estimate the relative density of the composite samples. For electrical tests, silver paste electrodes were applied to the surface of the samples. Dielectric measurements were performed in a temperature range of RT to 500 °C and frequency range of 20 Hz to 1 MHz using the QuadTech 1920 Precision LCR Meter (Maynard, MA, USA). The temperature dependencies of DC electric conductivity were registered via a Keithley 6517B electrometer (Cleveland, OH, USA) between RT and 450 °C. The ferroelectric tests (P-E loops) were performed at 5 Hz, and both at RT (for E = 4.5 kV/mm) and in the temperature range from RT to 120 °C (for E = 3.5 kV/mm). The Sawyer–Tower circuit and high voltage amplifier, Matsusada Inc. HEOPS−5B6 Precision (Kusatsu, Japan) and the NI USB-6002 transducer card (National Instrumental, Corporation, Austin, TX, USA) were used for the P-E tests. The fiber optic displacement sensor D63 (Philtec, Inc.) and a high-voltage amplifier (HEOPS-5B6 Precision) as well as the NI USB-6002 transducer card (National Instrumental, Corporation, Austin, TX, USA) were used to perform electromechanical measurements, i.e., strain as a function of electric field, S-E. The multiferroic composite samples were placed in a holder surrounded by silicon oil at room temperature [50]. Computer programs for controlling devices and reading measurement data were written in the LabView environment (National Instrumental, Corporation, Austin, TX, USA). Temperature magnetic measurements were performed in a range from −271 to 125 °C on the SQUID magnetometer (MPMS XL-7 Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA) for a magnetic field of 0.1 T. To estimate the piezoelectric properties, the multiferroic composite samples were polarized under the poling conditions (field/temperature/time) of 1 kV/mm, T = 100 °C, and t = 1 h (poling environment—silicone oil). The resonance and anti-resonance method was used to calculate the piezoelectric parameters of the composite samples. In contrast, a YE2730A d33 meter (APC International Ltd., Mackeyville, PA, USA) was used to estimate the quasi-static piezoelectric coefficients d33 at RT. Measurements of the voltage signal coming from the magnetoelectric coupling between the components of the composite were performed at room temperature. We used our homemade system with the dynamic lock-in technique described in detail in [51,52]. The measurements were carried out for the alternating magnetic field frequency f = 1 kHz and HAC = 4 Oe. To generate the DC magnetic field, an electromagnet was employed, while the induction of the constant magnetic field was changed between 0 and 0.13 T. The voltage signal was processed by the frequency-attuned lock-in amplifier (Model SR830 DSP Lock-In Amplifier, Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Structure

The X-ray diffraction patterns for both the ferroelectric and magnetic phases carried out at RT are depicted in Figure 1a, while the BT-F multiferroic composites are shown in Figure 1b. Commercial BaTiO3 powder shows the tetragonal phase, and a P4mm space group was detected (according to the ICDD 00-005-0626 pattern). On the other hand, the nickel–zinc ferrite (Ni0.64Zn0.36Fe2O4) showed a spinel structure with a cubic crystal system and Fd 3 ¯ m space group (according to the ICDD 01-077-9718 pattern). In the case of the BT-F multiferroic composites, two phases, BaTiO3 and nickel–zinc ferrite, for each composition, are visible in the patterns. The intensity of their diffraction peaks depends on the amount of the corresponding phase (BT and F). The analysis of X-ray diffraction patterns also showed a small amount of secondary BaFe12O19 phase (according to the ICDD 04-002-2503), which was created during the technological process. This is because slight amounts of unreacted iron were detected in the main Ni0.64Zn0.36Fe2O4 phase (Figure 1a). A small amount of unreacted iron (found according to the ICDD 04-003-7116) in the input ferrite powder easily connects with barium into the BaFe12O19 compound, creating an additional foreign phase. The visible increase in the secondary phase peak intensity with the increase in ferrite content in the BT-F composite confirms this statement (Figure 1b).

3.2. Microstructure

The SEM micrographs of the multiferroic composites are presented in Figure 2. SEM microstructural images were taken using two capture techniques, i.e., detection from backscattered electrons and the secondary detectors (SB), as the standard SEM method (Figure 2a–c) and detection of backscattered electrons (BSE) (Figure 2d–f). Generally, using the BSE technique allows for exposed areas in the microstructure of grains with higher and lower atomic numbers giving light and dark zones of the microstructure. However, the BSE method does not give satisfactory results in the case of the BT-F multiferroic composite. This may be because the atomic number difference between BT and F is not as significant as in the case of multiferroic composites built on PZT and ferrite, where the magnetic phase is strongly exposed against the background of the ferroelectric phase [34,53,54]. The microstructure of ceramic composites shows a strong degree of sintering, with joined-together grains and no clearly visible grain boundaries (Figure 2a–c). The presence of pores in the microstructure shows the shortcomings of the classical method when using high sintering temperatures during the technological process. Figure 2g shows the distributions of the ferroelectric (BT) and magnetic component (F) grain sizes. The analysis showed that as the amount of ferrite in the composite composition increases, the average size of ferrite grains increases and is 2.04 μm, 2.26 μm, and 2.63 μm for 95BT-F, 90BT-F, and 85BT-F, respectively. An increase in the tendency to form agglomerates (larger grain clusters) was also observed, along with an increase in the ferrite phase. For composite matrix grains (BT ferroelectric component), more significant grain size heterogeneity exists for the 85BT-F composition with 15 wt.% of ferrite (Figure 2a,d).
As mentioned above, previous microstructural SEM studies performed by using the BSE technique for various multiferroic composites have shown that it is the most effective method of imaging the distribution of the magnetic and ferroelectric phases. However, in the case of the multiferroic BT-F composite, electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) is a much more valuable and effective method for the above purpose (Figure 3). Based on the main elements of the magnetic component (iron) and the ferroelectric component (barium), areas of increased or decreased intensity of their presence in the microstructure of the multiferroic composite samples can be observed. Mappings depicted for lower magnifications give a clear image of the distribution of the ferroelectric and magnetic phases for a larger sample area. The decreasing amount of iron in the BT-F composite composition is also exposed well on the EPMA maps.
Surface EDS analysis for composite compositions was performed for five randomly selected surfaces at low magnification. The EDS analysis revealed the presence of all of the constituent elements of the composite material (Figure 4). The tables above the graphs (in Figure 4) summarize the results of the EDS analysis, which confirmed the change of individual elements in multiferroic composites with the increase in the ferrite content. Stronger peaks originating from iron (peak at about 6.4 keV) occurred for the 85BT-F sample, with the highest ferrite content, the intensity of which decreased for the 95BT-F sample.

3.3. Dielectric Properties

Figure 5 presents the temperature dependencies of the dielectric properties of BT-F multiferroic composites. The tests were conducted in the range from RT to 500 °C for 45 various frequencies (from 20 Hz to 1 MHz); it is clearly visible that permittivity values decrease with increasing frequency. At room temperature for the frequency 1 kHz, the values of permittivity ε for BT-F multiferroic composites were 930 (for 85BT-F), 1670 for (90BT-F), and 2056 for (95BT-F), while at the phase transition temperatures (Tm) they were 1746, 3042, and 3780 for 85BT-F, 90BT-F, and 95BT-F, respectively. Temperature permittivity measurements showed the presence of a clear maximum permittivity (εm) at the phase transition temperature (Tm) of the ferroelectric (BaTiO3) component (Table 1). Increasing the amount of ferrite in the composite resulted in a decrease in the εm value and the phase transition (ferroelectric/paraelectric) occurred in a wider temperature range. Above the phase transition temperature, local maxima were also observed. This dielectric dispersion is related to a conductivity phenomenon, which follows the Arrhenius-type thermal activation law [55,56]. These local maxima, clearly visible for the 85BT-F sample, practically disappeared for the 95BT-F sample, which confirms the above conclusions. More significant amounts of ferrite in the BT-F composite result in a significant reduction in permittivity at higher temperatures, and the phase transition tends to blur. In the work [57], for xBaTiO3-(1−x)Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 composites with higher ferrite content (for x = 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5), the above unfavorable changes were also observed.
As shown in several published papers, e.g., Refs. [57,58], increasing the amount of ferrite causes a rapid increase in dielectric loss factor (the values of tanδ significantly exceed the value of 1). Figure 5b,d,f show the temperature measurements of the dielectric loss factor for BT-F multiferroic composites. Dielectric loss factors have relatively low values and do not increase as rapidly as for other multiferroic composites with a higher content of the magnetic component reported in [57]. In our studies, at RT and 1 kHz, the values of tanδ are 0.059 (for 85BT-F), 0.045 for (90BT-F), and 0.037 for (95BT-F), while at Tm they are 0.060, 0.023, and 0.015, for 85BT-F, 90BT-F, and 95BT-F, respectively. For all BT-F samples, with increasing frequency, there is a decrease in the dielectric loss factor. Temperature tests of tanδ(T) revealed that with increasing temperature, starting from RT, the dielectric loss factor values begin to decrease in the range of 70–90 °C and then increase. Above 160 °C, their growth is already significant due to the increase in the electrical conductivity of the magnetic component of the composite materials. This is confirmed by the tanδ(T) charts recorded at higher temperatures for the BT-F composites. In this temperature range, for the 85BT-F sample, the increase in the tanδ values was the highest.
Figure 6 shows the collective temperature characteristics of the permittivity ε for five selected frequencies (0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 kHz) and the dielectric loss factor tanδ for the BT-F multiferroic composites for 1 kHz. BaTiO3 ceramic material exhibits high permittivity values (approx. 6000 for 1 kHz) at the phase transition temperature [59]. This presentation in Figure 6 clearly shows the adverse influence of ferrite on the dielectric properties of multiferroic composites. With the increase of ferrite amount in the BT-F composites, the permittivity decreases, and the dielectric loss factor increases, i.e., the dielectric properties deteriorate. However, as presented in this work, composites have a more favorable set of dielectric parameters compared to other composites described in the papers [23,58,60]. At higher temperatures, the violent increase of the permittivity is due to the activation of conductivity mechanisms at these temperatures causing high values of dielectric loss factor. The phenomenon is attributed to space charge effects, Maxwell–Wagner relaxation at the interface of the ferroelectric–magnetic phases, and defect mechanisms activated at both low frequencies and high temperatures [57]. It constitutes one of the common problems in multiferroic composite technology and is a severe difficulty in achieving high piezoelectric parameters during the poling process and high magnetoelectric response [26,60,61,62].
The frequency dependencies of the real and imaginary parts of permittivity (ε’ and ε”) at different temperatures (range from RT to 450 °C) are shown in Figure 7. The parameters mentioned above decrease with growing frequency (in the low-frequency range), which is typical for dielectric materials [63]. In the charts ε’(f) for all BT-F composite samples, a decrease in ε’ values with increasing frequency is visible. The electrical dipoles fail to follow the rapid alternating applied external electrical field at higher frequencies. Thus, the real permittivity will decrease if the reversal field frequency increases [28,63]. However, up to the temperature of 150 °C, no significant frequency change of real permittivity ε’ is observed. This regularity occurs in pure BaTiO3 until the phase transition temperature [60]. Above this temperature, thermal movements become an additional factor, and at low frequencies, a clear drop in ε’ occurs, which progresses with the increase in frequency. This phenomenon is strongly noticeable for the 85BT-F sample, which indicates a more powerful influence of the ferrite phase at low frequencies over a wide temperature range. Similar behavior was observed for the BaTiO3-(Ni0.3Zn0.7)Fe2.1O4 composite as reported in [60]. At low frequencies, the dielectric dispersion becomes prominent with the growing amount of ferrite. In the case of the 85BT-F sample, the phenomenon of ε’ growth with increasing temperature is most noticeable. Observed conduction is connected with the greater dielectric constant at reduced frequencies, while the polaron hopping mechanism induces electronic polarization to contribute to low-frequency dispersion [63]. According to the Maxwell–Wagner polarization model, space charge polarization is caused by dielectric material inhomogeneity [64]. In the case of the BT-F composites, poor conductive ferroelectric grains (BT) separate the strongly conductive ferrite grains. It causes the accumulation of charged particles at the grain boundaries by applying the electrical field (interfacial polarization) [63].
In the case of the imaginary permittivity (dielectric loss ε”), a quick decrease in ε” values occurring at low frequencies indicates a clear influence conduction contribution [60]. The resonance of the domain wall is responsible for the nature of the observed changes [63]. In the low-frequency region, the ε” indicates the same dispersion as in the case of the ε’. The lower values of ε” at high frequencies result from the lower tendency of the domain walls to move under these conditions. In the ε”(T) charts at some lower temperatures, strongly fuzzy maxima can be observed, which disappear entirely for higher temperatures. An asymmetric profile of ε” may be due to the overlapping of both the relaxation and the low-frequency conduction [60]. Above 350 °C, the slope of the straight line of the plot shows only the influence of the electric conductivity [65]. The presence of ferrite disturbs (blurs) the abrupt change of parameters ε’ and ε” in the BaTiO3 material in the frequency range from 105 to 106 Hz [66].

3.4. DC Electric Conductivity

At RT, the DC resistivity ρDC of the BT-F multiferroic composites has relatively low values, namely 7.3 × 106 Ωm for 85BT-F, 4.7 × 106 Ωm for 90BT-F, and 1.3 × 107 Ωm for 95BT-F. The DC electrical conductivity σDC variation with 1000/T is presented in Figure 8. All BT-F composite samples show a similar trend in the dependencies of electric conductivity on temperature. For the temperature range of 120–130 °C, the value of DC conductivity decreases with increasing temperature, and then starts to grow. This observed tendency is confirmed by the dielectric loss factor tests presented earlier.
With the increase in the amount of ferrite in the BT-F multiferroic composite, the DC conductivity increases. Generally, a BaTiO3 material is an n-type semiconductor and at Tm (about 120 °C), the character of the electrical conductivity changes (positive temperature coefficient of resistivity occurs, i.e., PTCR effect) [67,68,69]. In the case of BT-F multiferroic composites containing conductive ferrite, an increase in electrical conductivity occurs above this temperature. The experimental data conform to the Arrhenius equation [70], and the activation energy calculated from rectilinear stretches of the graph lnσDC(1000/T) at higher temperatures are 0.83 eV for 85BT-F, 0.93 eV for 90BT-F, and 0.88 eV for 95BT-F, respectively.
The conductivity of the ferroelectric materials at the lower temperature area is mainly related to the ionization processes (electrons or holes are the dominating charge carriers). In turn, the highest temperatures activate the extrinsic defects, and their mobility is responsible for the conductivity. At very high temperatures, intrinsic defects’ concentration and movement increase rapidly and are the dominant factor in the conduction process [71]. In ferroelectric perovskite materials, conductivity is predominantly related to oxygen vacancies and dipolar defect effects [72]. In turn, in magnetic materials containing iron, conductivity is mainly related to the hopping of charge carriers between the Fe ions occurring in various valence states [73]. The obtained activation energy values (in the range from 0.83 to 0.93 eV) of the multiferroic composites may indicate the presence of oxygen vacancies as the dominant factor [72].

3.5. P–E Tests

Ferroelectric polarization–electric field (P-E) loops of the BT-F composites are presented in Figure 9a. The P-E hysteresis loop of ferroelectric materials results from both the reversible and irreversible displacement of domain walls in an external field. The switching process is accompanied by energy dissipation in the ceramic material and produces undesired thermal losses [74]. All BT-F composite samples could withstand a high electric field, proving the ceramic material’s high quality and the correct technological process. The ferroelectric tests were performed at RT and the conditions as follows: electric field strength 4.5 kV/mm and frequency 5 Hz. All composite samples showed slim and high saturation P-E hysteresis loops. For the above measurement conditions, the values of residual polarization Pr were 7.44 µC/cm2 for 95BT-F, 5.76 µC/cm2 for 90BT-F, and 3.96 µC/cm2 for 85 BT-F, while the Ec coercivity field was 0.71, 0.75, and 1.09 kV/mm, for 95BT-F, 90BT-F, and 85BT-F, respectively. However, with the increase in the ferrite content in the composite, the maximum polarization and residual polarization decreased due to the high conductivity of the ferrite phase. It can also be seen that the P-E loops were slightly pinched (Figure 9a and Figure 10). This is usually attributed to the pinning of the domain walls by charged defects, where the mobile defects (electronic charge and oxygen vacancies) carriers are fastened firmly at domain walls, and they have no opportunity to reorient themselves [75].
The temperature changes in the ferroelectric properties of multiferroic composites are presented in Figure 10. The hysteresis loops P-E show saturation up to a specific limit temperature, above which they take the shape characteristic of ceramic materials with losses (they are not fully saturated with nonlinearity in the hysteresis loop) [76]. In Figure 9b,c, residual polarization and coercive fields determined from the temperature P-E loops are presented for the BT-F multiferroic composites as a function of temperature. The 85BT-F sample with the highest amount of ferrite loses the saturation and ferroelectric shape of the hysteresis loop the fastest with increasing temperature. This results in the oval shape of the hysteresis loop, which grows rapidly; therefore, the residual polarization increases the fastest. Loss of hysteresis loop saturation indicates the charge leakage in composite ceramic material during polarization [77]. In multiferroic composite materials, the ferroelectric properties are diluted due to the non-ferroelectric ferrite phase, and this phenomenon increases at higher temperatures. The trend is different for the sample with the highest amount of ferroelectric component (95BT-F). An increase in temperature (up to about 80 °C) does not cause significant changes in the value of Pr (Figure 9b, Pr is practically constant and has high values), while after reaching the temperature of 90 °C, the values of residual polarization decrease. On the other hand, the 90BT-F sample shows intermediate behavior, i.e., an increase in Pr values up to 90 °C and then a decrease. An increase in temperature also causes an increase in the coercive field Ec of the composite samples, shown in Figure 9c. In the case of the 85BT-F sample, the increase in the coercive field is the largest and results from the oval shape of the hysteresis loop (Figure 10a).

3.6. S-E Test

The bipolar strain curves measured at RT of the multiferroic ceramic composites are presented in Figure 11a. For BT-F composites, the shape of the S-E strain–electric loop shows symmetry under the influence of a variable electrical field. The deformation loops are typical for ferro-soft ferroelectric materials, i.e., with a small internal field and low coercive values. The S-E loops of the multiferroic composites show relatively low values of residual strain, Sr (Table 1). In the BT-F ceramic composites, the low strain hysteresis results from the small mobility of the domain wall, which decreases with increasing ferrite content in the composite material. For BT-F, the multiferroic composite distortion factor, Hs, was calculated from the positive arm of the S-E curves (Figure 11b) and according to Formula (1) below [78]:
H s = Δ S h a l f S m a x · 100 % ,
where ΔShalf is the difference between the maximum and minimum strain for half of the maximum electric field (%), and Smax is the strain for the maximum electric field (%). Values of the Hs are 17.18% for 95BT-F, 19.58% for 90BT-F, and 25.81% for 85BT-F.
The effective piezoelectric coefficients d 33 ∗ from the S-E charts were also calculated according to Formula (2) [79]:
d 33 ∗ = S m a x E m a x ,
where Emax is the maximum intensity of electric field.

3.7. Piezoelectric Properties

The values of the effective piezoelectric coefficient d 33 ∗ were 160.7 pC/N for 95BT-F, 120 pC/N for 90BT-F, and 77.8 pC/N for 85BT-F. The piezoelectric parameters were measured after the poling process (E = 1 kV/cm, T = 100 °C, t = 1 h) of the multiferroic composite samples and calculated using the resonance and anti-resonance method. The electro-mechanical coupling coefficient kp for the BT-F composites was in the range from 0.36 to 0.39, while the piezoelectric coefficient d31 was in the range from 28 to 46. The piezoelectric parameters, i.e., kp, d31, d33, and mechanical quality factor Qm, of the BT-F multiferroic composites are given in Table 1. The piezoelectric parameters achieved medium values because the composites were not fully polarized due to the presence of the ferrite component (with low resistance), which forced the limitation of applying high external fields to the samples. In contrast, the quasi-static piezoelectric coefficient d33 was in the range from 74 to 142. In the test conditions, there were discrepancies between the quasi-static piezoelectric coefficients d33 and the piezoelectric coefficients d31 (Table 1). This is because in order to obtain high piezoelectric parameters, it is necessary to use a high external electric field. Ferroelectric domain walls are more sensitive to displacements under the influence of high electric fields than weak dynamic uniaxial compressive pressure [79].

3.8. Magnetic Properties

The magnetization M(T) dependencies for multiferroic BT-F composites are depicted in Figure 12. Charts of the M(T) trend show a firm response from the magnetic phase and a faint response from the paramagnetic phase [80]. The results of the magnetic tests show that the magnetic properties depend on the amount of ferrite in BT-F composite materials and increases for the samples with increasing ferrite content. For all BT-F samples, the highest magnetization values occurred at the lowest temperature (−268 °C), gradually decreasing with increasing temperature. The magnetization values at the abovementioned temperature were 5.54 emu/g for 85BT-F, 2.64 emu/g for 90BT-F, and 0.35 emu/g for 95BT-F, while at RT, the M values decreased and were 4.12, 1.95, and 0.20 emu/g, for 85BT-F, 90BT-F, and 95BT-F, respectively.
The shapes of the M-H hysteresis (at RT) are distinguishing for the soft magnetic materials (insets in Figure 12) [39]. The influence of the amount of ferrite in multiferroic composites also influences the shape of the magnetic hysteresis loop. The magnetization values drop sharply as the amount of ferrite decreases. The Ms maximum magnetization (at maximum magnetic field 7 T), Mr residual magnetization, and Hc magnetic coercivity values of BT-F multiferroic composites are listed in Table 1.

3.9. Magnetoelectric Properties

Room-temperature measurements of the voltage signal confirming the existence of magnetoelectric coupling in BT-F multiferroic composites were carried out using the dynamic method (lock-in technique). In the lock-in method, the sample is placed in two mutually parallel magnetic fields, i.e., a constant HDC and variable HAC, and the voltage signal is measured at the sample electrodes. At a selected intensity and frequency of variable magnetic field, the relationship of the sample voltage UOUT with the constant magnetic field bias was measured. In our study, we selected an alternating magnetic field frequency of 1 kHz in order to be in agreement with the measurements of dielectric properties and because this frequency is a standard from the point of view of metrology. The magnetoelectric coupling coefficient α was calculated according to Equation (3):
α = 1 d U O U T H A C ,
where UOUT is the voltage due to the magnetoelectric coupling, d is the thickness of the sample, and HAC is the amplitude of the sinusoidal magnetic field (HAC = 4 Oe). Figure 13 presents the α(HDC) dependencies for the BT-F multiferroic composites.
The observed increase in the magnetoelectric voltage signal induced by the magnetic field can be attributed to the increase in mechanical strain in the magnetostrictive phase [81]. The shapes of the α(HDC) curves indicate a strong dependence on the piezomagnetic coupling strength, and an increase in the amount of ferrite in the BT-F composites causes an increase in the value of the magnetoelectric coefficient. The maximum values of the α coefficient are as follows: 2.99 mV/cm·Oe at 0.086 T (for 85BT-F), 2.50 mV/cm·Oe at 0.084 T (for 90BT-F), and 0.37 mV/cm·Oe at 0.079 T (for 95BT-F). The observed shift of the maximum value of α coefficient towards a higher magnetic field HDC correlates both with the increasing content of the ferrite phase in the composite and the increase in the average ferrite grain sizes. Because the contact area between the piezoelectric and magnetostrictive phases of the grains is the largest for the 85BT-F sample (the largest grains), the α coefficient achieved the largest value for 15 wt.% of ferrite. Based on the literature data, the coupling coefficient α reaches values from a few to several tens of mV/cm·Oe in single-phase multiferroics [51], while in composites/laminates, it can be up to hundreds of V/cm·Oe, especially in the resonance state [4,82]. For example, a high value of ME output (1200 mV/cm·Oe) was obtained in the composite containing 70% ferroelectric phase (PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3) and 30% ferrite phase (Ni0.93Co0.02Mn0.05Fe1.95O4−δ ) [45]. In the case of our 95BT-F sample, a slight change in the magnetoelectric signal was observed with an increase in the DC magnetic field. This was due to the small amount of magnetic phase in the 95BT-F composite, whose weak magnetic signal was also recorded in the previously presented tests of magnetic properties.

4. Conclusions

The multiferroic ceramic composites were successfully prepared and studied via the free sintering method. The influence of the ferrite content in multiferroic composite materials on the functional parameters was analyzed. The morphological, structural, ferroelectric, dielectric, magnetic, magnetoelectric, and electromechanical properties, as well electrical conductivity of (1−x)BaTiO3–x)Ni0.64Zn0.36Fe2O4 (BT-F) multiferroic composite samples were investigated. Optimum process conditions in the free sintering method have been established. The presented study demonstrates the possibility of obtaining ceramic composites with good multifunctional properties using the classical sintering method (free sintering), which is the cheapest, most common, and most appropriate method for the serial production of samples.
At room temperature, BT-F multiferroic composites exhibit dielectric, magnetic, and magnetoelectric properties simultaneously. Via the appropriate selection of the ferrite content in the composite composition, both a large spontaneous polarization and the appropriate magnetic moment could be achieved at room temperature. Multiferroic composites have high permittivity values (from 930 to 2056 at room temperature, while at the phase transition temperature, they are in the range from 1746 to 3780). Also, a low dielectric loss factor up to a temperature of near 150 °C, is preserved. Ferroelectric P-E hysteresis loops exhibit high saturation with equally high polarity. The highest dielectric and ferroelectric parameters have the composition with the smallest amount of ferrite phase (95BT-F sample). At the same time, the magnetic properties and the magnetoelectric effect of the composite samples depend on the ferrite content in the composite material and are the highest for the 85BT-F sample. The magnetization at RT is 4.12 emu/g, which is what the highest coefficient value α = 2.99 mV/cm·Oe corresponds to. The BT-F multiferroic composites have average piezoelectric parameters, related to the limitation of applying a strong polarizing field to the multiferroic composite samples.
Research has shown that free sintering maintains high dielectric and ferroelectric properties and appropriate magnetic and magnetoelectric properties in one composite material, ensuring the minimum product size. It is essential and desirable in microelectronic applications, e.g., ferroelectric memories and magnetic enhancements for spintronic devices and magnetoelectric transducers. The free sintering method can be successfully used for the serial production of composite materials (obtaining repeatable parameters during one technological process), compared to other sintering methods, the final product of which is a single one (obtaining the high repeatability of parameters is difficult).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma17081905/s1, Figure S1: SEM image of the raw BT material powder used in the experiment.; Figure S2: SEM image of the raw Ni0.64Zn0.36Fe2O4 (ferrite) material powder used in the experiment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B. (Dariusz Bochenek) and E.J.; methodology, D.B. (Dariusz Bochenek), E.J. and P.N.; investigation, D.B. (Dariusz Bochenek), P.N., G.D., G.Z., and D.B. (Dagmara Brzezińska), E.J., J.G. and J.S.; validation, D.B. (Dariusz Bochenek), P.N., G.D., G.Z. and D.B. (Dagmara Brzezińska), E.J., J.G. and J.S.; visualization, D.B. (Dariusz Bochenek), P.N., J.G. and D.B. (Dagmara Brzezińska); writing—original draft, D.B. (Dariusz Bochenek) and E.J.; writing—review and editing, D.B. (Dariusz Bochenek), P.N. and E.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present paper, in part, was financed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the statutory activity and, in part by the University of Silesia in Katowice competition “Freedom of research—4th edition” as part of the program entitled: “Research Excellence Initiative”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rao, C.N.R.; Sundaresan, A.; Saha, R. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric oxides: The emerging scenario. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 2237–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fiebig, M. Revival of the magnetoelectric effect. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, R123–R152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chu, Y.H.; Martin, L.W.; Holcomb, M.B.; Ramesh, R. Controlling magnetism with multiferroics. Mater. Today 2007, 10, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eerenstein, W.; Mathur, N.D.; Scott, J.F. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature 2006, 442, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Curecheriu, L.; Postolache, P.; Buscaglia, V.; Horchidan, N.; Alexe, M.; Mitoseriu, L. BaTiO3–ferrite composites with magnetocapacitance and hard/soft magnetic properties. Phase Transit. 2013, 86, 670–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, K.F.; Liu, J.M.; Ren, Z.F. Multiferroicity: The coupling between magnetic and polarization orders. Adv. Phys. 2009, 58, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leung, C.M.; Li, J.; Viehland, D.; Zhuang, X. A review on applications of magnetoelectric composites: From heterostructural uncooled magnetic sensors, energy harvesters to highly efficient power converters. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 263002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nan, C.W.; Bichurin, M.I.; Dong, S.; Viehland, D.; Srinivasan, G. Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: Historical perspective, status, and future directions. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 031101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Srinivasan, G. Magnetoelectric composites. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2010, 40, 153–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jedrecy, N.; Aghavnian, T.; Moussy, J.-B.; Magnan, H.; Stanescu, D.; Portier, X.; Arrio, M.-A.; Mocuta, C.; Vlad, A.; Belkhou, R.; et al. Cross-correlation between strain, ferroelectricity, and ferromagnetism in epitaxial multiferroic CoFe2O4/BaTiO3 heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 28003–28014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vopson, M.M. Fundamentals of multiferroic materials and their possible applications. Crit. Rev. Solid State 2015, 40, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bichurin, M.; Petrov, V.; Priya, S.; Bhalla, A. Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites and their applications. Adv. Cond. Matter. Phys. 2012, 2012, 129794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hill, N.A. Why are there so few magnetic ferroelectrics? J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 6694–6709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhai, J.; Xing, Z.; Dong, S.; Li, J.; Viehland, D. Magnetoelectric laminate composites: An overview. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 91, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Martin, L.W.; Crane, S.P.; Chu, Y.H.; Holcomb, M.B.; Gajek, M.; Huijben, M.; Yang, C.H.; Balke, N.; Ramesh, R. Multiferroics and magnetoelectrics: Thin films and nanostructures. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2008, 20, 434220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pachari, S.; Pratihar, S.K.; Nayak, B.B. Enhanced magneto-capacitance response in BaTiO3-ferrite composite systems. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 105609–105617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pachari, S.; Pratihar, S.K.; Nayak, B.B. Improved magneto-capacitance response in combustion derived BaTiO3-(CoFe2O4/ZnFe2O4/Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4) composites. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 784, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khomskii, D. Classifying multiferroics: Mechanisms and effects. Physics 2009, 2, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tokuraand, Y.; Seki, S. Multiferroics with spiral spin orders. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1554–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, Y.; Peng, B.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, M. Recent development and status of magnetoelectric materials and devices. Phys. Lett. A 2018, 382, 3018–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Niemiec, P.; Bartkowska, J.A.; Brzezinska, D.; Dercz, G.; Stoklosa, Z. Electrophysical properties of the multiferroic PFN-ferrite composites obtained by spark plasma sintering and classical technology. App. Phys. A-Mater. 2020, 126, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raidongia, K.; Nag, A.; Sundaresan, A.; Rao, C.N.R. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric properties of core-shell CoFe2O4@ BaTiO3 nanocomposites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 062904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pachari, S.; Pratihar, S.K.; Nayak, B.B. Microstructure driven magnetodielectric behavior in ex-situ combustion derived BaTiO3-ferrite multiferroic composites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 505, 166741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schmid, H. Multiferroic magnetoelectrics. Ferroelectrics 1994, 162, 317–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Woodand, V.E.; Austin, A.E. Possible Applications Magnetoelectric in Magnetoelectric Interaction Phenomena in Crystals; Freemanand, A.J., Schmid, H., Eds.; Gordonand Breach: London, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  26. Van den Boomgaardand, J.; Born, R.A.J. A sintered magnetoelectric composite material BaTiO3-Ni(Co,Mn)Fe3O4. J. Mater. Sci. 1978, 13, 1538–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, R.; Wang, Z.; Gao, R.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, G.; Deng, X.; Cai, W.; et al. Effect of molar ratio on the microstructure, dielectric and multiferroic properties of Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4-Pb0.8Zr0.2TiO3 nanocomposite. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 16226–16237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, H.; Mak, C.-L. Impedance spectroscopic characterization of fine-grained magnetoelectric Pb(Zr0.53Ti0.47)O3-(Ni0.5Zn0.5)Fe2O4 ceramic composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 513, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pradhan, D.K.; Chowdhury, R.N.P.; Nath, T.K. Magnetoelectric properties of PbZr0.53Ti0.47O3-Ni0.65Zn0.35Fe2O4 multiferroic nanocomposites. Appl. Nanosci. 2012, 2, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bammannnavar, B.K.; Chavan, G.N.; Naik, L.R.; Chougule, B.K. Magnetic properties and magnetoelectric (ME) effect in ferroelectric rich Ni0.2Co0.8Fe2O-PbZr0.8Ti0.2O3 ME composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 117, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pradhan, D.K.; Puli, V.S.; Kumari, S.; Sahoo, S.; Das, P.T.; Pradhan, K.; Pradhan, D.K.; Scott, J.F.; Katiyar, R.S. Studies of phase transitions and magnetoelectric coupling in PFN-CZFO multiferroic composites. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 1936–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gao, R.; Qin, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Fu, C.; Chen, G.; Deng, X.; Cai, W. Enhancement of magnetoelectric properties of (1-x)Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4-xBa0.85Sr0.15Ti0.9Hf0.1O3 composite ceramics. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 795, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guzdek, P.; Sikora, M.; Góra, Ł.; Kapusta, C. Magnetic and magnetoelectric properties of nickel ferrite–lead iron niobate relaxor composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 2007–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Chrobak, A.; Ziółkowski, G.; Błachowski, A. Magnetic and electric properties of the lead free ceramic composite based on the BFN and ferrite powders. Mater. Charact. 2014, 87, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ramana, M.V.; Kiran, S.R.; Reddy, N.R.; Kumar, K.S.; Murthy, V.R.; Murty, B.S. Investigation and characterization of Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 nanocrystalline ferroelectric ceramics: By conventional and microwave sintering methods. Mat. Chem. Phys. 2011, 126, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, W.; Fu, Z.; Wang, H.; Yuan, R. Influence of hot pressing sintering temperature and time on microstructure and mechanical properties of TiB2 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 22, 1045–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gonçalves, M.D.; Souza, F.L.; Longo, E.; Leite, E.R.; Camargo, E.R. Dielectric characterization of microwave sintered lead zirconate titanate ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 14423–14430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Laszkiewicz-Łukasik, J.; Putyra, P.; Klimczyk, P.; Podsiadło, M.; Bednarczyk, K. Spark plasma sintering/field assisted sintering technique as a universal method for the synthesis, densification and bonding processes for metal, ceramic and composite materials. J. Appl. Mater. Eng. 2020, 60, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Dercz, G.; Chrobak, A. Electrophysical properties of multiferroic PMN-PT-Ferrite composites sintered by spark plasma sintering. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2022, 563, 169909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hu, Z.-Y.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Cheng, X.-W.; Wang, F.-C.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Li, S.-L. A review of multiphysical fields induced phenomena and effects in spark plasma sintering: Fundamentals and applications. Mater. Des. 2020, 191, 108662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gupta, S.; Wang, D.X.; Randall, C.A.; Trolier-McKinstry, S. Comparison of different sintering aids in cold sinter-assisted densification of lead zirconate titanate. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 5479–5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, J.P.; Chen, X.M.; Ouyang, W.Q.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Fang, J.L. Microstructure, dielectric, and energy storage properties of BaTiO3 ceramics prepared via cold sintering. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 4436–4441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, R.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Chen, G.; Fu, C.; Deng, X.; Cai, W. Anomalous magnetoelectric coupling effect of CoFe2O4−BaTiO3 binary mixed fluids. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2019, 1, 1120–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Plyushch, A.; Lewin, D.; Sokal, A.; Grigalaitis, R.; Shvartsman, V.V.; Macutkevič, J.; Salamon, S.; Wende, H.; Lapko, K.N.; Kuzhir, P.P.; et al. Magnetoelectric coupling in nonsintered bulk BaTiO3–xCoFe2O4 multiferroic composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 917, 165519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ramana, M.V.; Reddy, N.R.; Kumar, K.V.S.; Murthy, V.R.K.; Murty, B.S. magneto-electric effect in multiferroic Ni0.93Co0.02Mn0.05Fe1.95O4-δ/PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 particulate composites: Dielectric, piezoelectric properties. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 25, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bansal, P.; Kumar, M.; Syal, R.; Kumar Singh, A.; Kumar, S. Magnetoelectric coupling enhancement in lead-free BCTZ–xNZFO composites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 17512–17523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Acosta, M.; Novak, N.; Rojas, V.; Patel, S.; Vaish, R.; Koruza, J.; Rossetti, G.A., Jr.; Rödel, J. BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics: Fundamentals, current status, and perspectives. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2017, 4, 041305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Devonshire, A.F. CIX. Theory of barium titanate—Part II, London, Edinburgh Dublin. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1951, 42, 1065–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reddy, M.P.; Madhuri, W.; Reddy, N.R.; Siva Kumar, K.V.; Murthy, V.R.K.; Reddy, R.R. Magnetic properties of Ni-Zn ferrites prepared by microwave sintering method. J. Electroceram. 2012, 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Skulski, R.; Wawrzała, P.; Ćwikiel, K.; Bochenek, D. Dielectric and electromechanical behaviors of PMN-PT ceramic samples. J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Struct. 2007, 18, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jartych, E.; Pikula, T.; Kowal, K.; Dzik, J.; Guzdek, P.; Czekaj, D. Magnetoelectric Effect in Ceramics Based on Bismuth Ferrite. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Grotel, J.; Pikula, T.; Mech, R. Application of the Lock-In Technique in Magnetoelectric Coupling Measurements of the PZT/Terfenol-D Composite. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Korzekwa, J.; Durtka, B.; Stokłosa, Z. Microstructure and properties of the ferroelectric-ferromagnetic PLZT-ferrite composites. Symmetry 2018, 10, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Chrobak, A. Effect of chemical composition on magnetic and electrical properties of ferroelectromagnetic ceramic composites. Materials 2021, 14, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Elissalde, C.; Ravez, J. Ferroelectric ceramics: Defects and dielectric relaxations. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 1957–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, T.F.; Tang, X.G.; Liu, Q.X.; Jiang, Y.P.; Huang, X.X.; Zhou, Q.F. Energy-storage properties and high-temperature dielectric relaxation behaviors of relaxor ferroelectric Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 ceramics. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 095302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Testino, A.; Mitoseriu, L.; Buscaglia, V.; Buscaglia, M.T.; Pallecchi, I.; Albuquerque, A.S.; Calzona, V.; Marr’e, D.; Siri, A.S.; Nanni, P. Preparation of multiferroic composites of BaTiO3–Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 3031–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sudhakaran, A.; Sudhakaran, A.; Sivasenthil, E. Electron density effect of hybrid ferrites on structural, spectroscopic, optical, and magnetic properties in (BaTiO3)(1-x)+(ZnFe2O4)x nanoceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hirose, N.; West, A.R. Impedance spectroscopy of undoped BaTiO3 ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1996, 79, 1633–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, Z.; Ang, C. Maxwell–Wagner polarization in ceramic composites BaTiO3–Ni0.3Zn0.7Fe2.1O4. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 91, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lupeiko, T.G.; Lisnevskaya, I.V.; Chkheidze, M.D.; Zvyagintsev, B.I. Laminated magnetoelectric composites based on nickel ferrite and PZT materials. Inorg. Mater. 1995, 31, 1139–1142. [Google Scholar]
  62. Qi, X.; Zhou, J.; Yue, Z.; Gui, Z.; Li, L.; Buddhudu, S. A ferroelectric ferromagnetic composite material with significant permeability and permittivity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2004, 9, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Parvin, R.; Momin, A.A.; Zubair, M.A.; Matin, M.A.; Akther Hossain, A.K.M. Investigation of magnetic and ferroelectric properties along with the magnetoelectric coupling behavior for asserting a room temperature bi-phase composite as multiferroics. J. Electroceram. 2020, 45, 56–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Maxwell, J.C. Electricity and Magnetism; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 1993; p. 828. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chen, W.; Zhu, W.; Ke, C.; Yang, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, X.F.; Tan, O.K. Impedance spectroscopy and conductivity mechanism of CoFe2O4–Pb(Zr0.53Ti0.47)O3 composite thick films. J. Alloys Compds. 2010, 508, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Meng, Y.; Liu, K.; Zhang, X.; Lei, X.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.; Peng, B.; Long, C.; Liu, L.; Li, C. Defect engineering in rare-earth-doped BaTiO3 ceramics: Route to high-temperature stability of colossal permittivity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 105, 5725–5737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, Z.; Sun, K.; Xie, P.; Liu, Y.; Gu, Q.; Fan, R.; Wang, J. Epsilon-negative BaTiO3/Cu composites with high thermal conductivity and yet low electrical conductivity. J. Mater. 2020, 6, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kolodiazhnyi, T.; Petric, A. Effect of PO2 on bulk and grain boundary resistance of n-type BaTiO3 at cryogenic temperatures. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 86, 1554–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gao, C.; Fu, Q.; Zhou, D.; Zu, H.; Chen, T.; Xue, F.; Hu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Luo, W. Nanocrystalline semiconducting donor-doped BaTiO3 ceramics for laminated PTC thermistor. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 1523–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Skulski, R.; Adamczyk, M.; Brzezińska, D. Electrophysical properties of the multicomponent PBZT-type ceramics doped by Sn4+. J. Electroceram. 2019, 42, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dwivedi, S.; Badole, M.; Narayanan, H.; Kumar, S. Influence of annealing environments on the conduction behavior of KNN-based ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 18057–18066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Barick, B.K.; Mishra, K.K.; Arora, A.K.; Choudhary, R.N.P.; Pradhan, D.K. Impedance and Raman spectroscopic studies of (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 355402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Iqbal, M.J.; Farooq, S. Enhancement of electrical resistivity of Sr0.5Ba0.5Fe12O19 nanomaterials by doping with lanthanum and nickel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 118, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jin, L.; Li, F.; Zhang, S. Decoding the fingerprint of ferroelectric loops: Comprehension of the material properties and structures. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rojac, T.; Bencan, A.; Malic, B.; Tutuncu, G.; Jones, J.L.; Daniels, J.E.; Damjanovic, D. BiFeO3 ceramics: Processing, electrical, and electromechanical properties. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 1993–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Paik, H.; Hwang, H.; No, K.; Kwon, S.; Cann, D.P. Room temperature multiferroic properties of single-phase (Bi0.9La0.1)FeO3–Ba(Fe0.5Nb0.5)O3 solid solution ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 042908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bobić, J.D.; Ivanov, M.; Ilić, N.I.; Dzunuzović, A.S.; Vijatović Petrović, M.M.; Banys, J.; Ribic, A.; Despotovic, Z.; Stojanovic, B.D. PZT-nickel ferrite and PZT-cobalt ferrite comparative study: Structural, dielectric, ferroelectric and magnetic properties of composite ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 6551–6557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bochenek, D.; Kruk, P.; Skulski, R.; Wawrzała, P. Multiferroic ceramics Pb(Fe1/2Nb1/2)O3 doped by Li. J. Electroceram. 2011, 26, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, S.; Shen, J.; Tian, J.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Q. Direct measurement of electric field-induced strains of a single lead zirconate titanate piezoelectric ceramic fibre under various conditions. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 1657–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Noheda, B.; Cox, D.E.; Shirane, G.; Ye, Z.-G.; Gao, J. Phase diagram of the ferroelectric relaxor (1–x)PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3-xPbTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 054104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hrib, L.M.; Caltun, O.F. Effects of the chemical composition of the magnetostrictive phase on the dielectric and magnetoelectric properties of cobalt ferrite–barium titanate composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 6644–6648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Priya, S.; Islam, R.; Dong, S.; Viehland, D. Recent advancements in magnetoelectric particulate and laminate composites. J. Electroceram. 2007, 19, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 17 01905 g001
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the BaTiO3 and nickel–zinc ferrite, * Fe (a) and BT-F multiferroic composites with different content of ferrite, * BaFe12O19 (b).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the BaTiO3 and nickel–zinc ferrite, * Fe (a) and BT-F multiferroic composites with different content of ferrite, * BaFe12O19 (b).
Materials 17 01905 g001
Materials 17 01905 g002
Figure 2. SEM images of the microstructure of the BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a,d), 90BT-F (b,e), and 95BT-F (c,f). SB technique (a–c) and BSE technique (d–f). Below, (g) the grain size distribution for BT (red) and F (blue) grains of the BT-F multiferroic composites.
Figure 2. SEM images of the microstructure of the BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a,d), 90BT-F (b,e), and 95BT-F (c,f). SB technique (a–c) and BSE technique (d–f). Below, (g) the grain size distribution for BT (red) and F (blue) grains of the BT-F multiferroic composites.
Materials 17 01905 g002
Materials 17 01905 g003
Figure 3. EPMA maps of the BT-F multiferroic composites for the main elements: Ba and Fe.
Figure 3. EPMA maps of the BT-F multiferroic composites for the main elements: Ba and Fe.
Materials 17 01905 g003
Materials 17 01905 g004
Figure 4. The EDS analysis of chemical elements of the BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a), 90BT-F (b), and 95BT-F (c). Tables above include experimental percentage of the individual elements of the BT-F composites.
Figure 4. The EDS analysis of chemical elements of the BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a), 90BT-F (b), and 95BT-F (c). Tables above include experimental percentage of the individual elements of the BT-F composites.
Materials 17 01905 g004
Materials 17 01905 g005
Figure 5. Temperature measurements of the dielectric properties, i.e., permittivity (a,c,e) and dielectric loss factor (b,d,f) for the BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a,b), 90BT-F (c,d), and 95BT-F (e,f).
Figure 5. Temperature measurements of the dielectric properties, i.e., permittivity (a,c,e) and dielectric loss factor (b,d,f) for the BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a,b), 90BT-F (c,d), and 95BT-F (e,f).
Materials 17 01905 g005
Materials 17 01905 g006
Figure 6. Temperature dependencies of dielectric properties for the BT-F multiferroic composites: permittivity (for selected frequencies 100 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz, 100 kHz, 1 MHz) (a), and the dielectric loss factor (for 1 kHz) (b).
Figure 6. Temperature dependencies of dielectric properties for the BT-F multiferroic composites: permittivity (for selected frequencies 100 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz, 100 kHz, 1 MHz) (a), and the dielectric loss factor (for 1 kHz) (b).
Materials 17 01905 g006
Materials 17 01905 g007
Figure 7. Frequency dependencies of permittivity ε’ (a–c) and dielectric loss ε” (d–f) for BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a,d), 90BT-F (b,e), and 95BT-F (c,f).
Figure 7. Frequency dependencies of permittivity ε’ (a–c) and dielectric loss ε” (d–f) for BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a,d), 90BT-F (b,e), and 95BT-F (c,f).
Materials 17 01905 g007
Materials 17 01905 g008
Figure 8. Variation of DC electric conductivity (σDC) with 1000/T for the BT-F multiferroic composites.
Figure 8. Variation of DC electric conductivity (σDC) with 1000/T for the BT-F multiferroic composites.
Materials 17 01905 g008
Materials 17 01905 g009
Figure 9. Electric hysteresis loops for BT-F multiferroic ceramic composites (at RT, for 5 Hz, E = 4.5 kV/mm) (a), variations in Pr(T) (b) and Ec(T) (c) for BT-F composite samples (5 Hz, E = 3.5 kV/mm).
Figure 9. Electric hysteresis loops for BT-F multiferroic ceramic composites (at RT, for 5 Hz, E = 4.5 kV/mm) (a), variations in Pr(T) (b) and Ec(T) (c) for BT-F composite samples (5 Hz, E = 3.5 kV/mm).
Materials 17 01905 g009
Materials 17 01905 g010
Figure 10. Temperature P-E loops for BT-F multiferroic composites (5 Hz, 3.5 kV/mm): 85BT-F (a), 90BT-F (b), and 95BT-F (c).
Figure 10. Temperature P-E loops for BT-F multiferroic composites (5 Hz, 3.5 kV/mm): 85BT-F (a), 90BT-F (b), and 95BT-F (c).
Materials 17 01905 g010
Materials 17 01905 g011
Figure 11. Bipolar strain (a) and positive arm of the S-E curves (b) of the BT-F multiferroic composites.
Figure 11. Bipolar strain (a) and positive arm of the S-E curves (b) of the BT-F multiferroic composites.
Materials 17 01905 g011
Materials 17 01905 g012
Figure 12. Temperature dependencies of magnetization for BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a), 90BT-F (b), and 95BT-F (c), inset—magnetic hysteresis loops at RT.
Figure 12. Temperature dependencies of magnetization for BT-F multiferroic composites: 85BT-F (a), 90BT-F (b), and 95BT-F (c), inset—magnetic hysteresis loops at RT.
Materials 17 01905 g012
Materials 17 01905 g013
Figure 13. Magnetoelectric coupling coefficient α of the BT-F multiferroic composites as a function of the constant magnetic field HDC.
Figure 13. Magnetoelectric coupling coefficient α of the BT-F multiferroic composites as a function of the constant magnetic field HDC.
Materials 17 01905 g013
Table 1. Electrophysical parameters of the BT-F multiferroic composite samples.
Table 1. Electrophysical parameters of the BT-F multiferroic composite samples.
Parameter85BT-F90BT-F95BT-F
ρ (g/cm3) 14.995.305.60
ρDC (Ωm) 17.3 × 1064.7 × 1061.3 × 107
M (emu/g) 25.54 2.64 0.35
Mmax (emu/g) 46.133.200.80
Mr (emu/g) 10.170.060.01
Hc (Oe) 12.081.870.12
ε 193016702056
Tm (°C)133132131
εm174630423780
tanδ 10.0590.0450.037
tanδ at Tm0.0600.0230.015
Ea (eV) below Tm0.380.390.35
Ea (eV) above Tm0.830.930.88
Pr (µC/cm2) 33.96 5.76 7.44
Ec (kV/mm) 31.09 0.75 0.71
Sr (%)0.0070.0030.006
Hs (%)25.8119.58 17.18
d33 (pC/N) 174142124
kp 10.360.390.38
d31 (pC/N) 1284634
Qm 1485332
1 test at RT, 2 test at −268 °C, 3 test at RT and E = 4.5 kV/mm, 4 test at magnetic field 7 T.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Brzezińska, D.; Dercz, G.; Ziółkowski, G.; Jartych, E.; Grotel, J.; Suchanicz, J. Magnetoelectric Properties of Multiferroic Composites Based on BaTiO3 and Nickel-Zinc Ferrite Material. Materials 2024, 17, 1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081905

AMA Style

Bochenek D, Niemiec P, Brzezińska D, Dercz G, Ziółkowski G, Jartych E, Grotel J, Suchanicz J. Magnetoelectric Properties of Multiferroic Composites Based on BaTiO3 and Nickel-Zinc Ferrite Material. Materials. 2024; 17(8):1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bochenek, Dariusz, Przemysław Niemiec, Dagmara Brzezińska, Grzegorz Dercz, Grzegorz Ziółkowski, Elżbieta Jartych, Jakub Grotel, and Jan Suchanicz. 2024. "Magnetoelectric Properties of Multiferroic Composites Based on BaTiO3 and Nickel-Zinc Ferrite Material" Materials 17, no. 8: 1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop