1. Introduction
The inclusion of nanomaterials in cement-based composites has been widely studied over the last two decades [
1]. It is now known that nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), amorphous silicon oxide, graphene oxide, aluminum oxide, iron oxide, and titanium oxide can modify the hydration reaction, rheology, mechanical properties, and durability of cement-based matrices [
2,
3]. Additionally, some of these nanomaterials can confer novel capabilities to cement-based composites such as self-sensing, self-cleaning, self-heating, electromagnetic shielding, and energy harvesting [
4,
5,
6].
Among these novel capabilities, great potential has been found in the use of piezoelectric cement-based composites to develop energy-harvesting floors capable of generating a portion of the electricity consumed by a building [
7]. Furthermore, piezoelectric properties extend beyond energy harvesting; these composites can generate energy without relying on external power sources to detect electric responses resulting from strain measurements, as observed in piezoresistive cement-based composites [
8,
9]. In other words, these nanocomposites have the ability to produce a small amount of voltage, electrical current, or power in response to applied strain, as demonstrated by Triana-Camacho et al. in their study on reduced graphene oxide–cement composites [
10]. They also suggested that electric power could be a great candidate as a sensing parameter in real SHM applications. In this context, two parameters (the piezoelectric voltage parameter
and the piezoelectric charge parameter
) play an important role in the characterization of the material’s piezoelectricity. The coefficient
reveals how much electrical charge can polarize and generate a voltage in the cement-based composite, while
shows how long it can preserve such polarization. In that sense, energy harvesting depends on both characteristics described above, which can be modified with different dispersion methodologies [
10] or using different concentrations of the nanocomposite with respect to the cement mass [
11]. Hence, the inherent self-sensing capabilities of piezoelectric cement-based composites can be effectively utilized in civil structures, including bridges [
12], obviating the need for intricate monitoring systems or external transducers [
13]. These embedded monitoring systems aim to identify and measure any degradation that might occur during service, avoiding degradation caused by weather changes or environmental conditions [
12].
As a central concern, cement paste has minimal inherent piezoelectric behavior; moreover, the electrical current generated by mechanical stress constantly decreases as a function of cyclic loading [
7]. Thus, the largest electrical current amplitude is observed during the first cycle of sinusoidal stress, followed by an intensity decrease in further stress cycles. These weak electrical phenomena can be explained by the water distribution in the cement structure, which causes electrical charge redistribution since cement paste is not a completely crystalline material [
14]. Nonetheless, such inherent piezoelectricity of cement composites can be improved by applying an external electric field while curing cement-based composites, as shown by AlQaralleh [
15], who improved the piezoelectricity of cement pastes while curing under an external voltage at 5 V, reaching up to three times the piezoelectric voltage parameter
over nontreatment cement pastes. In addition, Ma [
16] demonstrates that direct electric curing by 6 h makes cement obtain higher strength delaying ettringite formation.
Cement-based composites with piezoelectric materials have been developed with materials such as lead magnesium niobate ceramic [
17], lead zirconate titanate (PZT)-silica fume [
18], PZT-aluminum [
19], and carbon black [
20,
21], as active phases. In addition, composites capable of generating higher amounts of electrical current have been considered appropriate for energy harvesting applications [
7], while composites capable of generating lower amounts of electrical current have been considered appropriate for developing stress–strain sensors in smart civil infrastructure applications [
22]. However, all of them exhibit a decline in electric current during subsequent load cycles, as Chen has declared in his review of piezoelectric cement-based composites [
7].
Carbon nanotubes have been used as biosensors because they possess excellent electrical properties and a large specific surface area [
23]. Nonetheless, not only are the electrical characteristics of the embedded nanomaterials important but so is the affinity with the host structure that allows for the identification of localized defects in the structure, as shown by Tung et al. in the reference [
24] for graphene. For the same reasons, the electrical properties of Au NPs were also extrapolated to the cement industry to improve the electric or piezoelectric capability of cement composites [
25]. A similar effect is expected to be achieved by increasing the number of electric charge carriers by incorporating metallic nanoparticles into the cementitious matrix. These metallic nanoparticles can be synthesized from a noble metal, known for its inherent resistance to corrosion effects. Considering the above limitations, and after a careful literature survey of the noble metals added to cementitious materials, it was found that gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) have not been studied for developing piezoelectric cement-based composites, except for the manuscript of Triana-Camacho and coauthors [
26], who present the methodology to synthesize Au NPs, which are subsequently added to the cement paste. Interestingly, Au NPs have been commonly used in biosensor platforms or biomarker composites [
27,
28] and used to enhance the piezoelectric properties of polymer-based composites [
29].
In this context, this work explores the use of Au NPs as a strategy to increase the free electrical charge in the cement paste and provide a piezoelectric response. As another novelty of this research, these metallic nanoparticles can also improve the piezoelectric response of nanocomposites already known as highly piezoelectric, such as PZT. Moreover, the electric properties in alternating current (AC) were also studied through electrical impedance spectroscopy to interpret the piezoresistive effects across polarization resistance.
2. Materials and Methods
The materials employed in this study include a gold plate measuring 30 mm in diameter and boasting a thickness of 0.15 mm. The gold plate, sourced from Kurt Lesker Company, in the United Kingdom, exhibited a purity of 99.9999%. Additionally, ultra-pure water derived from a Milli-Q IQ 7000 apparatus with a resistivity of 18.2 M was utilized. Additionally, general-purpose Portland cement sourced from ARGOS-Colombia and a copper desoldering wire Hi-tronic manufactured in China, which measures 2.5 mm in diameter, was also used.
2.1. Gold Nanoparticles Synthesis and Characterization
Au NPs were produced by pulsed laser ablation in liquid (PLAL) with two different concentrations: low and high. The parameters used for the physical synthesis of gold nanoparticles were: temperature 25 °C, laser wavelength 530 nm, laser spot 12.6
, the time between pulses
s, pulse duration 8 ns, and pulse energy 350 mJ [
30]. The solvent (ultrapure water) volume that affects the optical path was 10 mL for the low-concentration Au NPs (442 ppm), and the ablation time was 5 min. For the high-concentration Au NPs batch (658 ppm), the solvent volume was 50 mL, and the ablation time was 10 min. The experimental setup mentioned above was selected considering the following criteria: (i) the total ablation time and the water volume has an impact on the size and concentration of the gold nanoparticles (Au NPs), as shown by Hernández-Maya and coauthors in the reference [
30]. Moreover, (ii) the size of nanoparticles affects how these interact with the cement matrix [
31]. Therefore, based on the previous statements, we tried to produce gold nanoparticles with a spherical morphology and size under 1000 nm, so that these Au NPs were incrusted inside the micropores produced by the characteristic hydration process, which takes place in the cement matrix, as well as diminishing the adverse effects on the mechanical properties on the cement-based composite [
32]. In this sense, the concentrations used were the consequence of searching for the best conditions to produce gold nanoparticles of low sizes and proper geometry, as reported previously by Arevalo and coauthors [
33].
The Au NPs particle size distribution was measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) at a 90° angle 10 min after the synthesis using a particle analyzer Litesizer 500 from Anton Paar (Graz, Austria) together with the particle sizing software Kalliope (version 2.8.3). Each sample was tested in triplicate, and each result was an average from 6 measurements. In addition, the visible light absorbance of the obtained particles spectra was measured using an Agilent 8453 UV-visible spectrometer equipped with a deuterium-discharge (from 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and tungsten lamps in 1 mm optical path quartz cuvettes.
Another way to determine the nanometric nature of Au NPs was through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The measurement was performed by way of the FEI QUANTA FEG 650 SEM manufacture by FEI company (5350 NE Dawson Creek Dr, Hillsboro, OR, USA) with an acceleration voltage of 25 kV. Also, this equipment uses detectors for images: Everhart Thornley ETD for secondary electrons (SE), and backscattered electron (BSE) type SSD for chemical analysis (energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). In particular, an EDAX APOLO X detector was used with a resolution of 126.1 eV (Mn K). The data from EDS measurements were processed by the software EDX Genesis (version 5.2). It provides semi-quantitative information about the chemical elements in the cement composite.
2.2. Au NPs–Cement Composites Fabrication
To avoid any agglomeration or precipitation effects, the Au NPs were used after a maximum resting time of one hour before any experiment carried out in this study. Cement paste was hand mixed with a water-to-cement ratio (w/c) of 0.47, and Au NPs were added in two absolute concentrations (442 and 658 ppm). These low concentrations of gold in the matrix were chosen to minimize the gold consumption since the material developed would become unfeasible if large amounts of Au NPs were necessary.
A reference sample devoid of nanoparticles served as the control within the experiment. The precise composition of every paste is outlined in
Table 1. The cement paste was cast into cylindrical molds measuring 60 mm in height and 30 mm in diameter. These molds were equipped with two holes, each measuring 3 mm in diameter, positioned at both 1/3 and 2/3 of the overall height. These apertures were utilized for embedding the copper wire into each sample, thereby functioning as measuring electrodes and maintaining a separation length of 20 mm. The configuration of the molds and the arrangement of the copper electrodes are illustrated in
Figure 1, as was previously reported by Triana-Camacho et al. [
26].
The cylinders were removed from the molds after 48 h of rest and then submerged in ultra-pure water for 28 days for curing. In total, 16 cylinders were made. The sample nomenclature was adopted according to their fabrication details, and the curing process are presented in
Table 2 [
26]. A group of 5 cylinders with different Au NP concentrations was cured and subjected to an external electric field to increase the cement paste’s inherent piezoelectric response [
7]. The electric field was applied in the axial direction of the cylinders, between parallel copper plates, using a DC source at 20.5 V throughout the curing time. This curing setup is presented in
Figure 2. At the end of the curing process, the cement paste cylinders were placed into an oven at 40 °C for 24 h to remove excess water in the pores of the composite [
34].
The cylindrical specimens were extracted from the molds following a 48-h setting period and subsequently immersed in ultra-pure water for a curing duration of 28 days. Then, a total of 16 cylinders were produced. The nomenclature assigned to each sample was based on its fabrication particulars and the curing regimen, and this nomenclature is delineated in
Table 2. A subset of 8 cylinders, each encompassing distinct Au NPs concentrations, was subjected to an external electric field (EF) to augment the inherent piezoelectric response of the cement paste. The application of the electric field was executed along the axial direction of the cylinders, positioned between parallel copper plates. A direct current (DC) source was employed, maintaining a consistent voltage of 20.5 V throughout the entire curing period [
26]. This curing arrangement is depicted in
Figure 2. Upon the culmination of the curing process, the cement paste cylinders underwent placement in a 40 °C oven for a span of 24 h, serving to eliminate excessive pore water within the composite [
34].
2.3. Electric and Piezoelectric Characterization
Two sets of experiments were performed on the Au NPs–cement composites. First, their polarization electrical resistance was calculated based on electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements, which was carried out using an AC potential signal of 10 mV while the frequency was swept from 1 MHz to 100 mHz in 60 evenly distributed points. Additionally, the specimens underwent extended EIS assessments spanning 253 days. This analysis aimed to track the temporal progression of both the polarization resistance and the heterogeneity parameter
within the constant phase element (CPE), described by the model
, where
signifies angular frequency and
denotes pseudocapacitance [
35]. Subsequently, for the assessment of their piezoelectric response, the specimens were testes in a universal testing machine (MTS-810 model, with a maximum force capacity of 500 kN). Here, a compressive load of 2.0 kN was applied in the axial direction, maintaining a constant loading rate of 0.02 kN/s. Simultaneously with the application of the load, the open-circuit potential (OCP) of each specimen was recorded. Importantly, it is worth noting that during the OCP measurements, no external voltage was imposed. This measure was taken to ensure that all outcomes directly corresponded to piezoelectric effects. A depiction of the experimental setup utilized for compressive load and OCP measurements can be found in
Figure 3. For both electrical impedance and OCP measurements, a potentiostat/galvanostat, specifically the Autolab model PGSTAT204, was employed.
Linear regression was used to establish the effect of the compressive stress on the OCP measurements, showing that the continuous deformation of a heterogeneous material causes preferent polarization on the inherently piezoelectric nanocomposites, molecules, or inclusions; this is described by the linear theory of the piezoelectricity [
36]. The piezoelectric voltage can be measured directly instead of polarization. It is known that there is a linear relationship between the piezoelectric voltage (which here is denoted as OCP) and mechanical sinusoidal input for cement-based composites too, based on the constitutive equations of piezoelectricity [
37]. Therefore, taking into account that the mechanical force and the electric polarization inside the sample change in the same time interval and that the force rate is slower than the internal changes of polarization (it does not consider a delay between both quantities), time was used to equalize OCP and mechanical load as presented in Equation (
1).
where
V is the OCP or piezoelectric voltage in (V);
F is the applied force in (kN); according to the linearity between the OCP and force, the parameter
is the initial OCP (i.e., at zero load); and the parameter
is the OCP-force coefficient in (mV/kN). The OCP-force coefficient can be defined as
, where
is the measured OCP rate and
is the applied force rate.
4. Conclusions
The inclusion of Au NPs in a cement-based composite was studied by means of electrical impedance spectroscopy to explore their use as an electrical charge carrier and to understand their effects on the piezoresistive response and polarization resistance of the composite. These properties were evaluated for 273 days to determine whether the electrical behavior can be maintained over a long period of time. It was found that the inclusion of a low concentration of Au NPs, such as 658 ppm, in a Portland cement matrix is capable of decreasing the total electrical resistance of the composite by almost four times and increases its piezoelectric response by 28 times. It was also observed that the use of an external electric field during the curing of the composites increased the piezoelectric response of the material by 57 times, proving to be an important step to be considered during the scaling-up process of a piezoelectric cement-based composite fabrication.
It should be highlighted that the increase identified in the could be also indicative of the piezoelectric behavior of the Au NPs. Further studies should be conducted to confirm this hypothesis. Additionally, further experiments could focus on combining low amounts of gold nanoparticles with known piezoelectric materials to identify if there is an increase in the efficiency of the piezoelectric effect of the cement-based composite. Regarding the price limitations of gold nanoparticles, it can be suggested that this composite is more suitable for the development of the small stress–strain embedded sensor and less suitable for the development of high-volume energy harvesting applications. Finally, to fully demonstrate the feasibility of Au NPs–cement composites, the effect of the nanoparticles on the chemical, mechanical, and durability properties of the hydrated cement matrix should be studied. Nevertheless, it is clear that the Au NPs confer a high number of electric carriers that can be used to enhance other piezoresistive or piezoelectric materials such as graphene, PZT, zeolites, and oxides, closing the gap to the real-world applications of piezoelectric cement-based composites. Examining the potential use of the developed composite as an embedded sensor within the same cylindrical geometry discussed in this research, and factoring in the current costs of gold nanoparticles, the investment required for producing a single sensor would range from USD 15 to 23. However, when combined with production costs and the expenses associated with gold recovery at the end of its life cycle, the commercialization of these composites becomes unfeasible for the proposed application, given the more economical alternatives available in the market. Nonetheless, the results showcased in this study underscore a promising application of metallic nanoparticles that could drive an uptick in industrial-scale production, subsequently leading to a reduction in prices—an anticipated trend in the current landscape of most nanomaterials.
As a final remark, it should be highlighted that, so far, there are no literature reports showing the recovery of any kind of nanomaterial from recycled concrete. Therefore, there are no clear schemes for recycling nanoparticles from solid cement-based composites. In the case of gold nanoparticles, one could use some chemical components with a high affinity with gold to absorb them from cement after a grinding process. Nevertheless, the chemical components commonly used in the synthesis of gold nanoparticles could be toxic and harmful to the environment, so it is necessary to evaluate the environmental impact of this process.