Next Article in Journal
Strength Prediction of Non-Sintered Hwangto-Substituted Concrete Using the Ultrasonic Velocity Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Impact of Sepiolite-Based Bio-Pigment Infused with Indigo Extract on Appearance and Durability of Water-Based White Primer
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of the Preparation of Porous Fibers and Porous Parts by a Novel Micro-Extrusion Foaming Technique
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wood-Poly(furfuryl Alcohol) Prepreg: A Novel, Ecofriendly Laminate Composite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Risks Associated with the Presence of Polyvinyl Chloride in the Environment and Methods for Its Disposal and Utilization

by
Marcin H. Kudzin
1,2,
Dominika Piwowarska
1,3,4,5,
Natalia Festinger
1,2 and
Jerzy J. Chruściel
1,2,*
1
Łukasiewicz Research Network—Lodz Institute of Technology, 19/27 Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie Str., 90-570 Łódź, Poland
2
Circular Economy Center (BCG), Environmental Protection Engineering Research Group, Brzezińska 5/15, 92-103 Łódź, Poland
3
Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Lodz, 21/23 Jana Matejki Str., 90-237 Łódź, Poland
4
UNESCO Chair on Ecohydrology and Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 12/16 Banacha Str., 90-232 Łódź, Poland
5
European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Tylna Str., 90-364 Łódź, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(1), 173; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010173
Submission received: 8 November 2023 / Revised: 12 December 2023 / Accepted: 14 December 2023 / Published: 28 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Industry Wastes and By-Products in Polymer Technology)

Abstract

:
Plastics have recently become an indispensable part of everyone’s daily life due to their versatility, durability, light weight, and low production costs. The increasing production and use of plastics poses great environmental problems due to their incomplete utilization, a very long period of biodegradation, and a negative impact on living organisms. Decomposing plastics lead to the formation of microplastics, which accumulate in the environment and living organisms, becoming part of the food chain. The contamination of soils and water with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) seriously threatens ecosystems around the world. Their durability and low weight make microplastic particles easily transported through water or air, ending up in the soil. Thus, the problem of microplastic pollution affects the entire ecosystem. Since microplastics are commonly found in both drinking and bottled water, humans are also exposed to their harmful effects. Because of existing risks associated with the PVC microplastic contamination of the ecosystem, intensive research is underway to develop methods to clean and remove it from the environment. The pollution of the environment with plastic, and especially microplastic, results in the reduction of both water and soil resources used for agricultural and utility purposes. This review provides an overview of PVC’s environmental impact and its disposal options.

1. Introduction

Plastics are ubiquitous materials used in a wide range of human activities due to their durability, low cost, and technological versatility [1].
In 2020, about 368 million tons of plastics were produced in the world. Moreover, almost 80% of plastic waste was discharged directly or indirectly into the environment [2,3,4]. Such uncontrolled disposal of materials can cause serious environmental damage, especially to the atmosphere, agricultural soils, and groundwater [5,6].
Environmental factors such as wind, sunlight, and rain can cause the degradation of polymers, leading to the formation of small and durable particles: microplastics (MPs) with a size of 1–1000 μm and nanoplastics (NPs) with a size of 1–1000 nm [7,8]. It is important to detect MPs in the environment as soon as possible to avoid the biological damage they cause. The amount and type of plastics in the environment are assessed, among other things, using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, thermogravimetric analysis technique, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscope, atomic force microscopy, water contact angle, and ion chromatography [6].
Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) is one of the six commonly used plastics (which accounts for as much as 10% of global plastic production) [2]. PVC is a popular plastic due to its low price, durability, and good mechanical, chemical, electrical, and thermal properties. The global production of PVC in 2009 amounted to approximately 34 million tons. At the global level, PVC production in 2015 exceeded 35 million tons, and the annual growth was forecast at approximately 2%. At that time, the European PVC consumption was approximately 7 million tons per year [9]. In 2022, PVC capacity was 59.97 million tons. The market is expected to achieve an annual growth of more than 3% during 2022–2027 [10].
This plastic is strong, durable, long-lasting, lightweight, and versatile, so it is widely used in many industries, such as in construction, automotive industry, pipes and cables, and household goods. The service life of PVC in construction is more than 10 years [11]. PVC can present a number of challenges at various stages of its life cycle, particularly at the waste stage. Sound waste management and disposal are essential due to the potential emission of PVC additives (e.g., heavy metal compounds) into the air (in the case of incineration) and into the soil (in the case of landfilling) but also due to illegal dumping and incineration. Various PVC additives also have hazardous properties and, therefore, when emitted, can pose a threat to the environment and human health [12].
PVC is considered as the most environmentally damaging plastic and one of the most toxic substances for inhabitants of our planet. From cradle to grave, the PVC lifecycle (production, use, and disposal) results in the release of toxic, chlorine-based chemicals, and it is one of the world’s largest dioxin sources. These toxins build up in water, air, and food chains. They cause severe health problems, including cancer, immune system damage, and hormone disruption. Everyone has measurable levels of chlorinated compounds (toxins) in their bodies [13,14,15,16,17].

2. PVC Characteristics

According to the IUPAC, the systematic name of PVC is poly(-1-chloroethylene) (Figure 1) [18,19,20]. It presents the linear, in most atactic structure of polymer chains, with the degree of polymerization ranging from 500 to 1500, corresponding to a theoretical molecular weight range of about 31,000–94,000 g/mol (Da). Poly(vinyl chloride) is white in color and a relatively stiff plastic with a high resistance to impact, chemicals, corrosion, water, and weather conditions [21].
PVC is synthesized through free-radical polymerization occurring via the head-to-tail tri-stage mechanism, depicted in Figure 2 [22].
In industrial practice developed since 1930 [23,24], vinyl chloride (VC) is polymerized in suspension processes (approximately 80% of the market), emulsions (~10–15%), bulk (~10%), and solution (~1%), respectively [20,25]. PVC production uses about 40 percent of the worldwide chlorine production, i.e., ~16 million tons of chlorine per year [26].
PVC has been one of the most widely used plastics for decades. PVC is classified into two broad categories: rigid PVC (unplasticised PVC, uPVC, rPVC, RPVC; used for automobile, health care, electronics, building and construction) and flexible PVC (fPVC; used for cables, wires, fittings, films, profiles, tubes, pipes, sheets, and bottles) [27]. Moreover, chlorinated PVC, molecularly oriented PVC, and modified PVC [28,29,30] are also produced on a smaller scale.
Pure PVC, due to its mechanical properties, requires some additives for the improvement of its processability and application needs. The most common additives used in PCV processing are, in particular, focused on the following chemical products: plasticizers, thermal stabilizers, fillers, impact modifiers, and/or pigments [31].
The list of representative plasticizers used in the PCV industry is given in Table 1.

2.1. PVC’s Physical Properties

PVC is classified as a self-extinguishing material. The limiting oxygen index (LOI) of the rigid PVC is approximately 44–49% [34].
The solubility of PVC is one of the major factors facilitating PVC leaching. Thus, the satisfactory resistance of PVC in an aqueous environment is caused by its insolubility in water [35]. Conversely, PVC is not resistant to the majority of organic solvents due to its substantial solubility, which are mostly: tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylacetamide (DMA), and/or pyridine [36].

2.2. PVC’s Chemical Properties

PVC, having a polychloroalkane structure, exhibits typical alkyl chloride reactivity, namely, it undergoes the nucleophilic substitution of chloride atom (1) [37,38], nucleophilic elimination of hydrogen chloride (2) [39], and free-radical chlorination (3) [40], which is illustrated in Figure 3. These reactions, due to PVC’s insolubility in water [35], seem to occur on the polymer surface, facilitating its leaching.
The degradation of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is mainly caused by the thermal dehydro-chlorination reaction (Figure 4), leading to the formation of conjugated double bonds or chlorine substitution (hydrolytic degradation) [41,42,43].
PVC waste is resistant to decomposition in the environment due to its high molecular weight, highly stable covalent bonds, and hydrophobic surface properties, creating a huge environmental problem during its production and disposal [6]. PVC waste is highly resistant to decomposition in the environment but often releases harmful chlorinated compounds that negatively affect the health of organisms and the ecosystem [8]. PVC is classified as a substance with strong mutagenic and carcinogenic properties, and it is more toxic than other plastics due to the presence of chlorine atoms in it [44].
Traditional methods for the storage and incineration of PVC waste lead to the release of harmful chlorinated compounds: hydrogen chloride and chlorine-containing dioxins (Figure 5) [45,46].
Pure PVC can only be used in the temperature range of −10 to +60 °C. The stabilized softened PVC can be used in the temperature range of −30 to +100 °C. The greatest problems are encountered during the processing of PVC because the thermal decomposition of PVC with the release of hydrogen chloride begins visibly at the temperature of 135 °C. In addition, the released hydrogen chloride in the presence of oxygen from the air accelerates the polymer decomposition process to such an extent that, at the temperature of 200 °C, the PVC decomposes almost completely [47].
In the thermal degradation of vinyl polymers, cleavage outside the main chain or the statistical cleavage of the main chain may occur. Light-induced ageing of PVC occurs as a result of the absorbed light energy, enabling photolysis, oxidation, and cross-linking reactions. PVC-based products used under atmospheric conditions are exposed to the destructive effects of atmospheric factors, such as UV radiation, precipitation, and temperature changes leading to the physical and chemical ageing of the material. Under the influence of UV radiation, free radicals are formed, causing the cleavage of the covalent bonds in PVC’s main chain, the splitting of hydrogen chloride, and the formation of new double bonds, causing the material to turn yellow. The next stage of the degradation is the photo-oxidation process leading to the whitening of the material and cross-linking due to the formation of oxygen bridges. The most characteristic changes caused by the degradation are the appearance of newly formed C=C double bonds, C=O carbonyl groups, and hydroxyl groups –OH in the chain, as well as the release of hydrogen chloride and carbon dioxide. The yellowing of the material is caused by a high temperature and low humidity. The PVC degradation process is a complex phenomenon resulting primarily from the dechlorination process, the course of which depends on the stabilizers used. PVC is the largest contributor to environmental pollution with dioxins on a global scale [47].
There are two types of the degradation of PVC [47]:
  • Preliminary (occurring under the influence of temperature, called thermal) under anaerobic conditions at the molecular or ionic level,
  • Secondary as a result of the increased temperature and oxygen action (thermo-oxidative degradation).
Because of the many concerns raised about PVC usage since the 1970s, PVC has become one of the most researched plastic materials from an environmental point of view. Despite all the technical and economic problems and the public discussions on the environmental dangers and hazards of chlorine chemistry, poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) is the second most produced plastic (with a worldwide capacity of about 60 million tons in 2022 [10]), being behind polyolefins and before styrene polymers [10]. But PVC also takes an important part in many environmental discussions on polymers, e.g., chlorine chemistry, toxicity of vinyl chloride, or waste and recycling problems. For a time frame of 70 years, some recent developments in the controlled polymerization of vinyl chloride, stabilization, modification of bulk properties, and chemical and material recycling of PVC are discussed.

2.3. Biological Activity of Poly(vinyl chloride)

Plastic products contain hundreds of potentially toxic chemical additives, which currently drive toxicity [48,49]. Micro- and nano-plastics may pose dangers of acute toxicity, (sub)chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and developmental toxicity [50]. This results from the polymer matrix, additives, degradation products, and adsorbed contaminants.
In contrast to its carcinogenic monomer [51,52,53,54], PVC is biologically inert due to its low chemical reactivity [49]. For instance, it is not digestible, even at the surface, for common strains (Lactobacillus acidophilus; L. plantarum, and L. rhamnosus) representing functional bacterial groups in the human gut microbiota. However, cytotoxicity investigations of PVC using the human cell lines Caco-2, HepG2, and HepaRG (a possible impact on intestine and liver) [55,56,57] and pulmonary cell cultures revealed the induction of cytotoxic effects [6]. Occupational exposures at a poly(vinyl chloride) production facility are associated with significant changes to the plasma metabolome [58]. PVC micro- and nano-particles can induce carcinogenesis to humans [59].
It has been reported that PVC particles produce moderate in vitro toxicity for human pulmonary cells [60,61] and cardiometabolic toxicity [62]. PVC induces changes in the microenvironment and secondary structure of human serum albumin (HAS) (decrease in α-helix) [63] and bovine serum albumin (BSA) [64], and it causes liver injury and gut microbiota dysbiosis [65,66]. PVC dust exerts a hemolytic effect on lung fibroblast cultures [67], and it causes liver angiosarcoma and lung cancer [51].
The toxicity of water after contact with PVC materials was found to be dependent on the type of PVC composition components and temperature [68,69,70,71]. The aquatic toxicity of PVC microplastics towards marine organisms (microalgae, crustaceans, and echinoderms) is due to the leaching of chemical additives and not the ingestion of microplastics (MPs) [72,73]. During the ageing process of MPs, additives are released that may cause severe genotoxicity [74].
PVC microplastics reduce sediment catalase, polyphenol oxidase (PO), and urease activities and decrease physicochemical indicators, including total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), and pH value [75].
Studies on a combustion gas of thermoplastic poly(vinyl chloride) showed its cytotoxicity to human fetal lung tissue cell (MRC-5), African green monkey kidney cell (Vero), and Chinese hamster ovary cell (CHO), with molecular chlorine as the major toxicant [76].
PVC composites for linoleum are equipped with antibacterial agents (e.g., 1,3-dioxanes, wollastonite, or quaternary ammonium biocides); therefore, they exhibit functions of biostatics, inhibiting the growth of microorganisms and bactericides, killing the microorganisms [77,78].

3. Threats Related to Production and Use of PVC

Due to its high durability, corrosion resistance, low price, and ease of installation, poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) finds many practical applications not only in industry but also in everyday life [79]. The largest PVC sales markets include the production of window profiles (27% of the total PVC application in Europe) and pipes, e.g., for drinking water (22% of the total PVC application in Europe). According to the inventory model of PVC production, a total of 2.4638 kg of wastewater is generated during the production of 1 kg of poly(vinyl chloride) from suspension polymerization (S-PVC) (Table 2).
The life cycle of PVC (from the extraction of the raw materials to the end of the production) is considered to be harmful to the environment. This is due to the fact that many pollutants are involved in the entire process [80]. In addition, it is believed that an important phase of the potential environmental impact of PVC pipes is also their installation [82].
It has been shown that the production of PVC has a significant share, e.g., in human toxicity potential (HTP), photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP), acidification potential (AP), and global warming potential (GWP) (Table 3) [83,84].
During the production of 1,2-dichloroethane from ethylene and chlorine, dioxins can be formed in the thermal cracking process of vinyl chloride monomers (VCMs). This is reflected in the HTP values. The higher values recorded for POCP are due to the processing of crude oil, which causes the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
The largest amounts of energy needed for the production of PVC are consumed during ethylene production processes. Also energy-intensive is chlorine production, which causes CO2 and SO2 emissions and contributes to high GWP and AP values [84]. A simulation conducted by Ye et al. showed that chlorine, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen oxides are the key compounds from PVC production contributing to the overall environmental burden [85]. For example, poly(vinyl chloride) in China is mainly produced using coal-based technologies with approximately three times higher CO2 emissions than generated in the case of oil-based technologies. In 2017 alone, the Chinese PVC industry emitted an estimated 123.54 million tons of CO2, three-quarters of which came from coal-based production [86].
It has also been shown that plasticizers such as phthalates or citrates added to PVC can migrate to solid, gas, or liquid media which come in contact with the plastic. The cause of the migration process may depend on, e.g., the molecular weight of the polymer, the nature and amount of the plasticizer, and environmental conditions [87].
Analyses conducted on the leaching of dibutyl phthalate (DnBP) from PVC microplastics in aqueous solutions corresponding to water and soil environments showed the relationship between the amount of released plasticizer and the size of polyvinyl chloride particles, concentration of added phthalate, as well as ageing of the plastic. The release of phthalates was higher for smaller particles and particles with a higher content of plasticizer. While the ageing of plastics due to solar radiation can either increase the release of phthalates (by increasing plastic hydrophilicity) or decrease it (by reducing readily available fractions), a solution’s pH and ionic strength have little effect on this [88]. The relationship between the size of PVC particles and the amount of additives released from it was also shown by Ye et al. [89].
Smaller PVC fragments release greater amounts of di-n-butyl phthalate than larger fragments. It has also been proven that temperature is a factor that affects the rate and size of migration much more than, for example, exposure to light or the particle size, and with increasing temperature (from 4.25 to 45 °C), both the speed and migration frequency increase [89]. Analyses conducted by Skjevrak et al. [90] showed that from PVC pipes, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were also released into water. Identified compounds included hexanal, octanal, nonanal, and decanal. Only trace amounts of hexanal and octanal were found in the analyzed water, while nonanal and decanal were present in concentrations ranging from 170 ng/L to 280 ng/L. The volatile compounds, 2,3-dichloro-1-propanol and dichloroacetic acid, have also been detected in bottled water. Moreover, the vinyl chloride monomer, benzene and the semi-volatile organic compounds such as di-n-octyl adipate and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, were also identified in some samples [91]. The use of intramolecular diffusion (IPD) and aqueous boundary layer diffusion (ABLD) models showed that the diffusion-determining process for continuous phthalate leaching is ABLD, and a high diffusion coefficient of PVC (~8 × 10−14 m2/s) enhanced IPD. Although the desorption half-lives of the tested PVC microplastics are expected to be longer than 500 years, under the influence of environmental factors, they can undergo strong changes, and the microplastics themselves are a long-term source of phthalates in the environment [92]. The combustion process also has a significant impact on the release of volatile compounds from PVC. The results of pollutant emission tests from burning pipes showed the presence of chlorinated compounds, i.e., hydrogen chloride, chlorine dioxide, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, allyl chloride, vinyl chloride, ethyl chloride, 1-chlorobutane, tetrachlorethylene, or chlorobenzene. The analysis of leachate from PVC pipes showed the presence of 40–60 components, mainly belonging to long-chain hydrocarbons (e.g., tetradecane, hexadecane, octadecane, docosane) [93].
The long life and a high durability of PVC compared to other plastics make it one of the most common plastic wastes in the environment. The estimated durability of PVC pipes is over 100 years [82]. Nevertheless, the large amount of the additives used in the production of PVC, its susceptibility to weathering processes, and the use of various advanced treatments required for its isolation from environmental samples lead to changes in the surface of PVC microplastics, which may result in large underestimations of its amounts in environmental studies [94].

4. Worldwide Pollution of the Aquatic Environment by the Poly(vinyl chloride) Industry

Their durability and low weight mean that plastic microparticles are easily transported along with air and water currents. A research on a floating debris in the ocean clearly showed that plastics are the most common type of pollution found in surface waters. Numerous methods for measuring microplastics in aquatic environments have been published recently [95,96,97]. Thus, Pan’s report on microplastics present in the Northwestern Pacific indicated the ubiquity of MPs with an average abundance of 1.0 × 104 items km−2. A micro-Raman spectroscopic analysis of the MP samples collected indicated that the dominant MPs were polyethylene (57.8%), polypropylene (36.0%), nylon (3.4%), polyvinyl chloride (1.1%), polystyrene (0.6%), rubber (0.9%), and polyethylene terephthalate (0.2%) [98].
Due to the fact that PVC is one of the most commonly used synthetic polymers and is characterized by a high density, not only does it occur in surface waters, but it is also particularly identified in sediments [97,99,100]. Representative papers on environmental pollution by PVC are presented in Table 4.

5. Toxicity of Poly(vinyl chloride) to Surface Water Trophic Networks and Humans

Most of the additives are not covalently bound to the plastic; therefore, they can easily migrate to the surface of the material and be released into the environment [136,137]. The additives exhibiting toxic properties towards organisms can be distinguished as bisphenols [138] and phthalates [139], which are indicated as potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in both animals and humans [140]. The monomer used in the production of PVC—vinyl chloride (VCM) is also highly toxic and cancerogenic [141]. VCM is released into the workplace and into different environments and causes cancer in laboratory animals [26].
During the PVC lifecycle, very large quantities of hazardous organochlorine by-products are formed accidentally and released into the environment. They are highly persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic, and they have been shown to cause a range of health hazards, which, in some cases, are at extremely low doses, including the following:
  • Cancer,
  • Disruption of the endocrine system,
  • Reproductive impairment,
  • Impaired child development and birth defects,
  • Neurotoxicity (damage to the brain or its function),
  • Immune system suppression.
Most important by-products of the PVC lifecycle are dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin) and a large group of structurally and toxicologically related compounds, generally called dioxins or dioxin-like compounds. Dioxins are global pollutants found in the tissues of whales in the deep oceans and polar bears in the high Arctic. Human infants receive particularly high doses (orders of magnitude greater than those of the average adult) because dioxins cross the placenta easily and concentrate in breast milk [26].
Phtalate plasticizers used in PVC technology leach out of PVC-based materials. They can be found in the water of the deep oceans, air in remote regions, and the tissues and fluids of the general human population. Phthalates can damage the reproductive system, causing infertility, testicular damage, reduced sperm count, suppressed ovulation, and abnormal development and function of the testes and male reproductive tract in laboratory animals. They cause cancer in laboratory animals. The phthalates used in processing PVC may lead to asthma. Metal stabilizers present in PVC are also highly toxic and are not degraded in the environment [26].
The effect of humic acid (HA) on the photo-ageing process of poly(vinyl chloride) microparticles (PVC-MPs) was studied using FTIR spectroscopy. The ecological risk was assessed through bioassays. The presence of HA increased the rate of the photo-ageing of PVC-MPs. Moreover, the chemicals leaching from PVC-MPs showed higher acute and genetic toxicities under light irradiation in comparison to dark conditions. The presence of HA significantly enhanced the biotoxicity of the leachate, indicating the ecological risk of MPs in surface waters [142].
It was estimated that rivers are responsible for the transport of 70–80% of the total amount of plastic that ends up in oceans, where they interact with see animals. The data from 778 publications based on field and experimental studies (LITTERBASE) were summarized by Tekman et al. [143].
Most of it comes from manufacturing processes, agriculture, and wastewater treatment plants discharging wastewater into water systems [144]. Microplastics, such as PVC, once released into the environment, pose a serious threat to ecosystems [145,146]. Due to their small size (<5 mm), the microplastics are easily absorbed by biota, causing negative effects on their development, reproduction, and survival [147,148,149]. It has been shown, among others, that PVC MPs accumulate and negatively affect such aquatic organisms as invertebrates [99], zooplankton [150], or fish [104,151,152] (Table 4).
The harmful effects that microplastics can cause on aquatic species include neurotoxicity, behavioral changes, histopathological damage, biochemical and hematological changes, and embryotoxicity (Tekman, 2022) [143]. In addition, due to their size similar to plankton, poly(vinyl chloride) and other microplastics are easily absorbed by aquatic organisms from various trophic levels, and they are accumulated at higher levels, entering the food chain and, thus, posing a threat not only to animals but also to humans [144,153]. Moreover, plastic waste can cause injury and abrasion to coral tissues, thus facilitating the invasion of pathogens such as Rhodobacterales, which dominate the biofilm that forms on PVC in the marine environment [143,154].
Plastics not only threaten the survival of more than 800 species of animals, including large marine mammals (e.g., whales and dolphins) and various birds, but also, through the transfer and release of toxic chemicals such as harmful additives, persistent organic pollutants, and heavy metals (e.g., lead), result in the chemical pollution of the environment, invasion of exotic species, and a degradation of local tourism and fishing industries [50,155,156,157,158]. The pathways of plastic debris and microplastic transportation in the environment and their biological interactions were described by Meem et al. [159].
Using the example of Daphnia magna, it has been proven that PVC has a negative effect on the reproductive processes of zooplankton. PVC microparticles at concentrations of 10–500 mg/L led to a decrease in reproduction efficiency, and at a concentration of 500 mg/L, it delayed it. The toxic nature of PVC was due to the substances added to it, as it was the chemicals extracted from it that were harmful to the model organism [150]. The delay in the hatching period combined with the occurrence of oxidative stress and changes in the expression of genes related to reproduction and detoxification in D. magna exposed to PVC microplastics (PVC-MPs) at sizes of 2 and 50 µm were also demonstrated [160]. Chronic exposure to the tested microplastic, e.g., extended the days to the first brood, increased the total number of broods per female, reduced the number of her offspring, disrupted the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), and increased the level of glutathione (GSH). Studies conducted on Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Chaetoceros gracilis, and Thalassiosira sp. also showed toxic properties of PVC MPs towards representatives of diatoms. The high concentration of PVC (200 mg/L) reduced the content of chlorophyll in the cells and negatively affected the processes of photosynthesis (Table 5). In addition, the PVC MPs caused a physical damage to the diatom’s cell structure [161]. The acute toxicity of PVC to cultured human cell lines was also detected [162].
Since microplastics such as PVC are commonly found in drinking water [174,175,176] and bottled water [177,178], the human body is also exposed to their harmful properties [179,180].
It was estimated that people who consume the recommended daily amount of water only from bottled sources may consume up to 90,000 microparticles of plastics per year, compared to 4000 microparticles of plastics consumed by people drinking only tap water [181]. Sources of human exposure to microplastics and their impact on aquatic organisms were described by Gola et al. [182]. In addition to the exposure to MPs along with the water contaminated with them, the ways in which humans are exposed to MPs include the consumption of seafood, the global per capita consumption of which is over 20 kg per year [183]. For example, research results have indicated that the exposure of an average Irishman to the microplastics accumulated in seafood intended for consumption ranges from 15 to 4471 particles per year [131]. Other estimates indicate that the maximum amount of microplastic particles absorbed by humans from seafood is 53,864 particles per year. These data were based on global consumption estimates of 15.21 kg of fish per year/person, 2.65 kg of molluscs per year/person, and 2.06 kg of shellfish per year/person [184].
Microplastics are also common in commercially available sea salt obtained from the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea, and the most frequently identified molecules in the study by Fischer et al. were polypropylene and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (in 16 out of 17 samples), polyethylene (15/17), polystyrene (13/17), and poly(vinyl chloride) (7/17) [185]. The potential human exposure to the microplastic particles found in sea salt was estimated to be 0–1.674 particles/year [186].

6. Contamination of Soil with PVC (and Other Plastics)

Agricultural soils are deeply affected by pollution from microplastics and synthetic polymers. Contaminants arise from bead fragments, plastic mulches, films, fibers, or biodegradable plastics [187]. Plastics are used in agriculture in order to improve production and ensure food safety for human health. The microparticles of polyethylene (PE), polyamide (PA), polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) are commonly found in the soil [188,189]. The microplastics are subject to accumulation, which can be reduced by using biodegradable materials [190]. Their accumulation in the soil is much higher than their accumulation in aquatic habitats. It is estimated that the amounts of plastic in the soil worldwide is equal to about 0.6 mgkg−1 of dry soil [6]. Sources of the plastic contamination of the soil may include illegal dumping, irrigation with contaminated water, and atmospheric deposition [8,191].
The plastics can release toxic chemicals into the soil, which then seep into ground water [192]. They reduce water percolation, limit the aeration of the soil, and contribute to climate change by releasing large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere during their production and degradation. The effect of plastics on the physicochemical properties of the soil depends on their type, amount, shape, and particle size [8]. Since a polymer’s surface is sometimes charged, plastics can interact with charged ions found in the soil [193]. The large amounts of the microplastics present in the soil negatively affect the biophysical and chemical properties of the soil, including the structure, porosity, texture, pH, surface area, and nutrient content [194]. Polymer particles can affect soil aggregation, which leads to the loss of the soil strength. Due to the lack of oxygen below the soil surface, the polymer aggregation is characterized by the slow rate of biodegradation. Importantly, the biodegradation process under anaerobic conditions produces methane and carbon dioxide [195]. The MPs adsorb or release heavy metals during ageing. Any changes in the soil pH and heavy metal availability due to microplastic particle contamination may be indirectly related to soil microbial activity [196]. The presence of PVC in the soil significantly increases the rate of soil nitrification and nitrate reductase activity, which may further promote soil denitrification [197]. Recent studies have indicated that PVC increased the NH4+-N content and decreases the NO3-N content [198]. The relative abundance of ammonium-oxidizing and denitrifying bacterial groups changed significantly after the addition of MPs. Moreover, the presence of PVC significantly increased the richness of denitrifying bacteria in the soil [188]. Microplastics react with natural fertilizers such as cow manure, causing a greater impact on natural greenhouse gas emissions such as nitrous oxide, ammonia, carbon dioxide, and methane [199].
Due to limited photooxidation and limited oxygen conditions necessary for degradation, microplastics can persist in the soil for more than 100 years [8]. MPs are also toxic when ingested by living organisms. A major danger is their accumulation in a biological chain [74]. Studies have indicated that MPs smaller than 130 µm accumulate in human tissues and release toxic substances, affecting the function of organs such as the liver and lungs [180].
Different types of microplastics can exhibit different behaviors, causing different impacts on soil ecosystems [200]. Microplastic particles with a size of 50 nm taken up by plants can penetrate the roots, where the spherical plastic particles with the size of about 2 μm and a low degree of mechanical flexibility have been identified [190].
It was found that PVC caused a significant reduction in the fresh weight of shoots and a decrease in the number of fruits of the plant Solanum lycopersicum L.; it caused a marked increase in Ni and Cd contents, as well as the decrease in nutritionally valuable lycopene [201]. PVC is more dangerous than other MPs—it affected the nutritional properties of the Capsicum annuum plant, reduced the maximum protein content, and strongly affected contents of vitamin A and vitamin B6 in the fruit. Moreover, PVC reduced the content of oleic and linoleic acids and seriously degraded the total content of flavonoids and phenols. The effect of PVC on the macro- and micro-nutrients of the C. annuum fruit, especially Ca, K, Mg, and Zn, is also not insignificant [202].
Moreover, plastics in the soil can affect the community structure of soil bacteria and fungi, which are important components of soil microbiota [8,147]. Thus, they play a fundamental role in regulating soil ecosystem functions. Soil bacteria and fungi have different sensitivities to environmental disturbances [8]. PVC reduces the diversity of microflora in the soil rhizosphere [200]. Earthworms are a key factor in maintaining a healthy soil ecosystem. These invertebrates modify the hydraulic properties of the soil and lead to microplastic transport through the formation of burrows, as has been demonstrated for the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris [203]. Microplastic particles affect a wide range of organisms, such as protists, flagellates, ciliates, nematodes, ameba, and isopods [204], and they can restrict their movement by attaching to their external body surface. Their ingestion can cause gastrointestinal damage, reduced responses, poor metabolism, reduced fitness and growth, and increased fatality in the earthworms. Exposure to as little as 1% and 2% (wt./wt.) has been shown to have lethal effects [190]. Nematodes were also used to study the effects of microplastics on soil organisms. Contact with microplastic particles on Caenorhabditis elegans caused the inhibition of the body length and reproduction rate. They cause permanent intestinal damage due to the reduced calcium levels and an oxidative stress in the gut, which result from the accumulation of the enzyme glutathione S-transferase [205]. Even a one-day exposure of the nematodes to higher concentrations of microplastics significantly affected the number of offspring [190]. Microplastic exposure in the soil was responsible for the reduction of the body weight and reproductive capacity of collembolans and the modulation of Isopods’ immune processes [190,206].

7. Disposal Methods of Poly(vinyl chloride) from the Environment

In the face of the increasing levels of environmental pollution from waste plastics, the development of highly efficient and environmentally friendly methods for their degradation is urgently needed. In 2000, the European Commission published a Green Paper for PVC waste [207], which assessed various environmental and health aspects and the possibility of reducing its impact on the environment. It paid particular attention to measures leading to solutions to PVC waste management problems. For example, in the Vinyl2010 Voluntary Commitment, it was suggested to reduce organochlorine emissions through the sustainable use of additives and various controlled-cycle management strategies. Its successor, VinylPlus, set an annual recycling target of 900,000 tons by 2025 and at least 1,000,000 tons by 2030 [11,208].
It seems promising to carry out complete dechlorination processes before degradation. Owing to full dechlorination, PVC can be treated in the same way as common halogen-free plastics [209]. Such methods include chemical modifications, the near-critical methanol process for PVC dechlorination and recovery of additives, and the near-critical process using an aqueous ammonia solution. Among these techniques, the well-known method is the chemical modification of PVC through the substitution of some chlorine atoms with various nucleophilic reagents. Another technique used to convert waste into energy with simple, fast reactions is hydrothermal treatment. In this technique, super- or sub-critical water is used as a solvent and reagent for the reaction of organic compounds [210].
Various additives and solvents such as NaOH or dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were used to improve the dechlorination efficiency. However, when large amounts were applied, their recycling caused problems (Table 6) [211].
Moreover, despite the frequent use of certain chemicals in the hydrothermal dechlorination of PVC waste, their role in this process has not been fully understood. Analyses conducted by Zhao et al. with the use of Na2CO3, KOH, NaOH, NH3·H2O, CaO, and NaHCO3 in water containing Ni2+ showed that the alkalinity of the additives has a significant impact on the effectiveness of the dechlorination process. The most effective additive in these studies was Na2CO3 (concentration 0.025 M), with a maximum efficiency of 65.12% [218]. The processes carried out using subcritical water-NaOH (CW-NaOH) and subcritical water-C2H5OH (CW- C2H5OH) proved that the main mechanism in the case of the dechlorination in CW-NaOH is the nucleophilic substitution of hydroxyl group in PVC, while in CW-C2H5OH—the nucleophilic substitution and direct dehydrochlorination were the equally significant processes [191]. The key parameter of the dechlorination process is temperature. As the efficiency of this process also decreases with a decrease in temperature, the above-mentioned additives were used to improve the efficiency. Unfortunately, the incorporation of the additives not only increased the costs of the dechlorination process, but also generated secondary pollution [219]. Temperature was also shown to be important in the removal of chlorine (Cl) from PVC in gas–liquid fluidized bed reactor studies where hot N2 was used as the fluidizing gas to fluidize the polymer melt [220].
Although poly(vinyl chloride) is a commercially important polymer, it is also one of the most sensitive to UV radiation. A study by Yang et al. showed that the rate of the photoaging of plastics is faster than other ageing processes; therefore, it is one of the most common methods of PVC degradation [221]. The UVA radiation in deionized water, sea sand, and air was used to photodegrade plastics. The results showed that PVC effectively absorbs the UVA radiation in air, and this is where the ageing efficiency was the greatest. The ageing process included photoinitiation, chemical bond breaking, and oxygen oxidation [74,221].
Under the influence of UV radiation (in the wavelength range of 253–310 nm) and in the presence of oxygen and moisture, PVC underwent very rapid processes of dehydro-chlorination and peroxidation to form polyenes. The irradiated material crumbled, lost its stretch, elasticity, and impact resistance, and the surface of the degraded polymer was significantly modified, i.e., loss of abrasion resistance, gloss, and interfacial free energy were observed [212,222].
The use of the photodegradation process makes it easier to dispose plastics from the environment. In order to accelerate the photodegradation of plastics, semiconductor photocatalysts such as TiO2, ZnO, Fe2O3, CdS, and ZnS were also used. For example, it was observed that the addition of ZnO to PVC increased the decomposition of the composite by 4.13% in the case of artificial UV radiation and by 9.7% in the case of solar radiation, respectively [223]. A photodegradable composite film was prepared by doping poly(vinyl chloride) plastic with nano-graphite (Nano-G) and a TiO2 photocatalyst. After exposure to the UV radiation (for 30 h), the weight loss rates of Nano-G/PVC, TiO2/PVC, and Nano-G/TiO2/PVC films were 7.68%, 8.94%, and 17.24%, respectively, while pure PVC decreased its weight by only 2.12% [224].
PVC is less biodegradable than other plastics [225,226]. Therefore, there have been many studies on the thermal decomposition and photodegradation of PVC, but there are a few reports in the literature on the biodegradation of poly(vinyl chloride) compared to other polymers [227], and microorganisms capable of decomposing it, both in the aquatic environment [228] and in the soil, are sought [229].

7.1. Recycling and Utilization of PVC

PVC can be recycled using various material and energy recovery methods [230].
Recycling techniques include:
mechanical methods—consisting in extruding and mixing the material with primary polymers,
chemical methods—changing the polymer structure of the material using chemical and thermal agents [231].
The mechanical recycling is the most-recommended way to recycle PVC [43]. The conventional mechanical recycling processes are based on the separation, shredding, and application of shredded material with an unchanged chemical composition to a processing equipment. In this technique, plastics are collected and sorted by hand and/or machines at recycling plants and then flaked in a high-speed mill and cleaned with a detergent and water. Finally, the dry flakes are melted and cast into pellets from which new products can be made [213]. The limitation of the mechanical or secondary recycling is that it cannot be used in the case of the unmodified PVC waste of a known composition and origin [230].
For economic and environmental reasons, the feedstock recycling of PVC is used, including waste that cannot be mechanically recycled. This relatively simple method of PVC recycling allows for energy recovery, which consists of the gasification of fuels or direct combustion in specialized thermal utilization plants. In the case of energy recovery, a fraction of PVC is mixed with other types of waste. The thermal process consists of two steps: dechlorination and the use of the remaining hydrocarbons. Through the thermal recycling of PVC waste, hydrogen chloride is recovered, and other recovered chemicals can find various applications, especially in the chlorine industry [43]. Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) waste with a high chlorine content is the source of chlorine, providing hazardous chlorinated organic pollutants, which can be reused as chemicals, fuels, and feedstock [232].
Some new mechanical recycling technologies are based on selective dissolution for the recycling of PVC in an economically feasible way. However, currently, only a small amount of PVC post-consumer waste is being recycled. Incineration, in conjunction with municipal waste disposal, is a simple option that allows for the partial recovery of energy and chemical substances when state-of-the-art technology is applied [233].
One of the common chemical recycling techniques is pyrolysis, divided into hydrocracking, thermal cracking, and catalytic cracking [21]. Although pyrolysis is an effective method for converting PVC waste into energy, it yields products containing significant amounts of chlorine [234,235]. The release of harmful substances such as polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (dioxins) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (furans) also occurs in processes such as incineration [231]. During the thermal degradation of PVC, HCl is eliminated, leading to the formation of conjugated double bonds, and it, in turn, attacks other compounds with double bonds, leading to the production of organochlorine compounds [236]. Even if PVC is landfilled instead of incinerated, during the process, it may release, among others, phthalates and heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and tin [209]. Therefore, these processes, including storage, pose a significant risk of releasing chlorinated organic compounds, microplastics, and pollutants into soils and waters [237]. Due to the low efficiency of the recycling and the tendency to cause secondary pollution, the traditional methods of disposal of the plastic waste—incineration and landfilling—have been banned [231]. Therefore, it has become important to develop techniques to reduce Cl migration.

7.2. Biodegradation of PVC Waste

The biodegradation of plastics found in the soil is a complex process. The efficiency of this process is influenced by the availability of substrates assimilable by microbial consortia, molecular weight, surface and morphological characteristics, as well as the structure of the polymers [238]. The biodegradation includes the formation of microbial biofilms on plastic surfaces, followed by the enzymatic degradation of the polymer structure, which leads to the release of oligomers and monomers [8]. The biochemical transformation of resistant polymers by microorganisms usually involves the transformation of complex compounds into simpler forms, leading to a reduction in the molecular weight, as well as the loss of the mechanical strength and surface properties of plastics. The biochemical degradation processes of PVC consists of five stages: colonization, biodeterioration, biofragmentation, assimilation, and mineralization. The first stage of the biodegradation mechanism is the colonization of the microorganisms on the plastic surface. It involves the adhesion of living microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) to the surface of plastics and their use for microbial growth and reproduction. During colonization, the microorganisms form biofilms, which causes damage to the polymer surface [239]. The physical and chemical actions of the microorganisms lead to the biodeterioration and superficial degradation of many kinds of polymers, including PVC. They causes changes in their physical, mechanical, and chemical properties [240].
The prolonged exposure to light, high temperatures, and chemicals in the atmosphere facilitates the biodeterioration process. The microorganisms penetrate the polymers and increase pores and cracks. On the other hand, some microbial species with chemolithotrophic potential promote oxidation and reduction reactions, and chemical biodeterioration [239]. Biofragmentation is a lytic process that allows for the breakdown of polymers into monomers, dimers, or oligomers. The process involves a decrease in the molecular weight of polymers and the oxidation of the lower-weight molecules using specific enzymes (oxidoreductases and hydrolases), as well as free radicals [217]. An enzymatic depolymerization of plastics released monomers that were transported into cells, where they underwent a series of enzymatic reactions leading to complete degradation and the formation of CH4, CO2, H2O, and N2 [241]. The mineralization stage can be aerobic or anaerobic, and it was catalyzed by several enzymes: cutinase, laccase, esterase, peroxidase and lipase in a study [239]. PVC-MPs significantly inhibited the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency of anaerobic granular sludge (AGS) by 13.2−35.5%, accompanied by 11.0−32.3% decreased formation of methane and 40.3−272.7% increased accumulation of short-chain fatty acids [242].
Examples of the biodegradation of PVC with different kinds of microrganisms [228,243], bacteria (Pseudomonas, Mycobacterium, Bacillus, and Acinetobacter), and fungi (Basidiomycotina, Deuteromycota, Ascomycota) were reported recently. Surface damage and a molecular-weight decrease were observed [214,244,245,246]. Also, an extracellular lignin peroxidase of the fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium showed PVC-degrading activity [247]. Alternatively, the biodegradation of PVC occurred with bacteria isolated from the larva’s gut microbiota (Spodoptera frugiperda). Enzymatic assays (e.g., catalase-peroxidase, dehalogenases, enolase, aldehyde dehydrogenase, and oxygenase) caused the depolymerization of PVC [248].
Enzyme specificity and temperature are of great importance in the degradation of plastics. Moreover, the use of several microbial consortia and several enzyme complexes allows for an increase in the biodegradation efficiency compared to a single enzyme or single microorganisms [8]. It is known, however, that the biodegradation of PVC involves three main reactions, including the chain depolymerization, oxidation processes, and the mineralization of the resulting intermediates [249]. An effective approach to the bioremediation of the environment from plastics is their initial thermal treatment. After the thermo-oxidative modifications of PVC, it was noticed that Achromobacter denitrificans bacteria isolated from compost were able to eliminate 12.3% of the plastic, which was evidenced by its weight reduction [250].
Of all higher organisms, only some insects are capable of degrading various plastics and converting them into monomeric compounds. In particular, insects in their larval stages have shown the ability to degrade plastics [216]. Insects that metabolize plastic include yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor), giant mealworms (Zophobas atratus), and superworms (Z. atratus). It is thought that this unique “plastic-eating” phenomenon may be related to the ability of some of these insects to degrade lignin [251]. The insects have also been shown to ingest polymers, with the actual ingestion being led by the microorganisms inhabiting their guts [239,251,252,253].
Some bacteria, e.g., Pseudomonas citronellolis, were capable of degrading PVC films. A 45-day incubation resulted in a fragmentation of the material and a decrease in its average molecular weight by 10%. The maximum weight loss during the further stages of the experiment was 19% [215]. Almost 12% weight loss of PVC was also observed in an experiment conducted in anaerobic microcosms using enriched anaerobic consortia from marine samples (waste and water). In addition, this material showed lower thermal stability after 7 months of incubation [228].
Changes in the mechanical properties of the material were also observed in the analyses carried out using isolates of marine bacteria of the genus Vibrio, Altermonas and Cobetia. The most effective microorganisms in the elimination of PVC turned out to be the Altermonas BP-4.3 strain, in which case, after 60 days of incubation, a 1.76% loss in the weight of the poly(vinyl chloride) film was observed [254]. Micrococcus luteus from areas heavily polluted with plastics was able to mineralize 8.87% of PVC. This level was achieved in cultures maintained for 70 days with mineral substrate [255].
The importance of microorganisms in processes such as the depolymerization of PVC was also demonstrated using the example of microorganisms living in the intestines of Tenebrio molitor larvae. For biodegradation tests, rigid PVC microplastic powders (MPs) were used (70–150 μm), with weight-, number-, and size-average molecular weights (Mw, Mn, and Mz) of 143,800, 82,200, and 244,900 g/mol, respectively, as the sole diet at 25 °C. The ingested PVC was broadly depolymerized, and the Mw, Mn, and Mz values decreased by 33.4%, 32.8%, and 36.4%, respectively. After 5 weeks of experiments involving the incorporation of poly(vinyl chloride) into the larvae diet, their survival rate with PVC as the only component of the diet was maintained at the level of up to 80% [243]. The ability of T. molitor to eliminate PVC was also confirmed by Bożek et al. after 21 days of the exposure of mealworm to poly(vinyl chloride) in the diet; a 3% loss in the mass of the material was observed [252]. Two bacterial strains isolated from oil-contaminated soil (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Achromobacter sp.) showed the ability to degrade PVC containing epoxidized vegetable oil (75% by weight), resulting in a change in the material’s surface topography and a decrease in its tensile strength during an incubation period of 180 days [245]. Some microorganisms are capable of degrading PVC. However, the PVC materials used in these study were largely plastics containing plasticizers. It was found that some bacterial strains acted mainly on the PVC additives, and there was a low ability to degrade PVC without the additives [215].
Apart from bacteria, microscopic filamentous fungi were also tested as organisms potentially capable of degrading PVC. Analyses carried out using Chaetomium globosum (ATCC 16021) have shown, for example, that this fungus was able to adhere to the surface of PVC, which was the first stage of the degradation process [214]. An exposure of PVC fragments containing plasticizers (dioctyl phthalate and dioctyl adipate) to the atmosphere for a period of 2 years showed that between the 25th and 40th weeks, the surface of the plastic was dominated by Aureobasidium pullulans. After 80 weeks, the next microorganisms identified were, e.g., Rhodotorula aurantiaca and Kluyveromyces spp. All tested strains of A. pullulans grew in the presence of PVC, using it as a carbon source, degrading plasticizers, and producing an extracellular esterase and reducing the substrate weight during growth [256].
Biodegradation potential, through adhesion to poly(vinyl chloride) by Lentinus tigrinus PV2, Aspergillus niger PV3, and Aspergillus sydowii PV4, was also confirmed (Ali, 2014) [257]. For fungi of the genus Aspergillus (A. Niger Sf1 and A. glaucus Sf2), it was observed, among others, that there was 10% and 32% weight loss of PVC over 4 weeks of the experiment, respectively, while for Bacillus licheniformis Sb1 and Achromobacter xylosoxidans Sb2, with the same observation time, the values were 15% and 17%, respectively [258]. Phanerochaete chrysosporium PV1 strain showed the potential for PVC film degradation, for which Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis showed significant structural changes in the material. This was confirmed by peaks corresponding to alkenes appearing, decreases in peak intensity appearing in the case of C–H stretching, and a decrease in the weight of the analyzed PVC itself [257]. The decrease in the PVC weight was also demonstrated during the experiment conducted for 12 weeks with strains isolated from the soil. The loss of 0.064 g/m2 for Mucor hiemalis, 0.300 g/m2 for Aspergillus versicolor, 0.341 g/m2 for Aspergillus niger, 0.619 g/m2 for Aspergillus flavus, 0.082 g/m2 for Penicillium sp., 0.240 g/ m2 for Chaetomium globosum, 0.330 g/m2 for Fusarium oxysporum, 0.240 g/m2 for Fusarium solani, 0.364 g/m2 for Phoma sp., and 0.145 g/m2 for Chrysonilia sitophila was observed, respectively. The ability of Mucor sp. fungi to grow in the presence of poly(vinyl chloride) as the only source of carbon and energy was also demonstrated [259].
With regard to the fact that additives added to polymers may increase their physical and chemical degradation, it has also been shown that the addition of a small amount of cellulose to PVC may cause changes in its properties and facilitate its microbiological degradation [225,260,261].
Under aerobic conditions, vinyl chloride (VC) served as the sole source of carbon and energy for Pseudomonas putida strain AJ and Ochrobactrum strain TD, which were isolated from hazardous waste sites. Analyses conducted on the biodegradation of vinyl chloride, used as a monomer for PVC production, showed that alkene monooxygenase is responsible for its metabolism in AJ strains of Pseudomonas putida and AD Ochrobactrum bacteria [262]. The degradation of acetate-modified PVC (PVA) involved, among others, enzymes such as oxidases [263]. The activity of PVA oxidase was correlated with PVA dehydrogenase. The β-diketone group was introduced into the PVA polymer molecule through the product of the reaction carried out by the dehydrogenase. This product, through an active site of serine hydrolase, initiated the oxidation reaction by PVA oxidase. This was followed by hydrolysis to form the monomer [264]. While there is a lot of data on the enzymes involved in the degradation of modified poly(vinyl chloride), scientific reports on the mechanisms and enzymes involved in the degradation of PVC are virtually nonexistent [263]. This is due to the high chemical stability and hydrophobicity of the C-C skeleton of PVC [265]. Among the few data available, there is a mention that, in the case of genus Cochliobolus, in the degradation of low molecular weight PVC, laccase is involved [266].

8. Conclusions

Polymers and plastics have become an important daily commodity around the world. Demand for them is very high in all industrial sectors. Most of the polymers are insoluble in water and pose a serious threat to the environment because they deplete natural resources and limit their use. Problems of the microplastic pollution of agricultural soils are becoming continuous irrigation with wastewater, the use of sewage sludge, and mulching with plastic films.
Water and soils contaminated with PVC and other plastics pose a threat to living organisms. The microplastics contaminate groundwater and agricultural soils, which is particularly dangerous. They accumulate in the living organisms, thus becoming a part of the food chain.
Due to the slow rate of their biodegradation, all plastics can survive in the environment for centuries. It follows that microplastic pollution is a long-term problem. Methods of the removal of PVC from the environment; its thermal, photo-, and bio-degradation processes; as well as recycling and utilization methods have been described in this article in more detail and a more comprehensive manner than in other reviews.
To the best of our knowledge, the impact of recycling methods on the molecular structure of PVC and the effect of its molecular weight on the chemical structure of the PVC recovered during the recycling processes have not been studied so far. It also seems quite obvious that particles size, molecular weight, and the kind and contents of plasticizers, antiaging agents, and other additives affect the rates of the thermal destruction, photo-, and bio-degradation of PVC, depending on environmental conditions.

9. Future Directions

One of the most common commodity plastics in the environment is PVC, which massively contaminates resources. There is no information on the consumption of plastics, including PVC, by livestock. Microplastics can cause adverse effects on animal health and accumulate in their bodies, thus becoming part of the food chain. Special attention should be paid to the aspect of the effects of microplastic pollution on the lives of higher organisms. The widespread pollution of the environment (water, air, and soil) indirectly causes the reduction of natural resources such as water and soil. Polluted water and soils pose a threat to the life and health of all living organisms, from microorganisms and plants to animals and humans.
The accumulation of plastics in the soil is expected to increase due to the continued growth in the production and use of plastics, as well as the lack of effective plastic waste management strategies. A solution could be the use of biodegradable polymers, especially cellulose and its derivatives, polylactide (PLA) or poly(ε-caprolactone), the production and the use of which continue to grow. However, the breaking down of biodegradable plastics can also produce microplastic particles [267]. Given the scale of the plastics market and their degradation period, microplastic pollution is still a long-term problem.
An extensive long-term research is needed to determine the exact impact of microplastics on the environment and the health of living organisms. Only then can we be in a position to have precise impact data and determine actions leading to significant improvements in this field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.H.K.; writing—original draft M.H.K., D.P., N.F. and J.J.C.; writing—review and editing: J.J.C.; visualization: M.H.K.; supervision: M.H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly financed within the National Science Centre (Poland), project M-ERA.NET 2022, No. 2022/04/Y/ST4/00157.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are included in the text.

Acknowledgments

This research was partly carried out within the National Science Centre (Poland), project M-ERA.NET 2022, No. 2022/04/Y/ST4/00157.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De-la-Torre, G.E.; Dioses-Salinas, D.C.; Pizarro-Ortega, C.I.; Santillán, L. New plastic formations in the Anthropocene. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 14221–14226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Plastics Europe. Plastics—The Facts 2021. 2021. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2021/ (accessed on 2 October 2023).
  3. Qi, R.; Jones, D.L.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q.; Yan, C. Behavior of microplastics and plastic film residues in the soil environment: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 134722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J.R.; Law, K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2023, 3, e1700782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bouaicha, O.; Mimmo, T.; Tiziani, R.; Praeg, N.; Polidori, C.; Lucini, L.; Vigani, G.; Terzano, R.; Sanchez-Hernandez, J.C.; Illmer, P.; et al. Microplastics make their way into the soil and rhizosphere: A review of the ecological consequences. Rhizosphere 2022, 22, 100542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, Y.; Xian, Z.-N.; Yue, W.; Yin, C.-F.; Zho, N.-Y. Degradation of polyvinyl chloride by a bacterial consortium enriched from the gut of Tenebrio molitor larvae. Chemosphere 2023, 318, 137944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bermúdez, J.R.; Swarzenski, P.W. A microplastic size classification scheme aligned with universal plankton survey methods. MethodsX 2021, 8, 101516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barili, S.; Bernetti, A.; Sannino, C.; Montegiove, N.; Calzoni, E.; Cesaretti, A.; Pinchuk, I.; Pezzolla, D.; Turchetti, B.; Buzzini, P.; et al. Impact of PVC microplastics on soil chemical and microbiological parameters. Environ. Res. 2023, 229, 115891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Available online: http://tts-polska.com/tts-polska2/informacje/polichlorek-winylu.html (accessed on 3 October 2023).
  10. Available online: https://www.globaldata.com/store/report/polyvinyl-chloride-market-analysis/ (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  11. Miliute-Plepiene, J.; Fråne, A.; Almasi, A.M. Overview of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) waste management practices in the Nordic countries. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 100246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Uropean Commission. The Use of PVC (Poly Vinyl Chloride) in the Contex of a Non-Toxic Environment. 2022. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e9e7684a-906b-11ec-b4e4-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed on 5 October 2023).
  13. Available online: http://archive.greenpeace.org/toxics/html/contenUpvc1.html (accessed on 5 October 2023).
  14. Available online: http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/toxics/go-pvc-free/ (accessed on 6 October 2023).
  15. Available online: http://www.who.inUmediacentre/factsheets/fs225/en/ (accessed on 7 October 2023).
  16. Available online: http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/!oxics/go-pvc-free/ (accessed on 7 October 2023).
  17. Available online: http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2011/2011-01-21-01.htmlhttps://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=PVC-Free+Future%3A+A+Review+of+Restrictions+and+PVC+free+Policies+Worldwide (accessed on 9 October 2023).
  18. Titow, W.V. (Ed.) PVC Polymers BT—PVC Plastics: Properties, Processing, and Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 53–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fisher, I.; Schmitt, W.F.; Porth, H.C.; Allsopp, M.W.; Vianello, G. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gilbert, M.; Patrick, S. Poly(Vinyl Chloride). In Brydson’s Plastics Materials, 8th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 329–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, J.; Sun, L.; Ma, C.; Qiao, Y.; Yao, H. Thermal degradation of PVC: A review. Waste Manag. 2016, 48, 300–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Endo, K. Synthesis and structure of poly(vinyl chloride). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002, 27, 2021–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Braun, D. PVC—Origin, growth, and future. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2001, 7, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Braun, D. Poly(vinyl chloride) on the way from the 19th century to the 21st century. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saeki, Y.; Emura, T. Technical progresses for PVC production. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002, 27, 2055–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thornton, J. Environmental Impacts of Polyvinyl Chloride Building Materials. Healthy Buiding Network. 2002. Available online: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Environmental+Impacts+of+Polyvinyl+Chloride+Building+Materials (accessed on 10 October 2023).
  27. Howard, M. Exploring the Global Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Market Size: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities, Demand, Growth. 2030. Available online: https://Www.Zionmarketresearch.Com/Sample/Polyvinyl-Chloride-Pvc-Market (accessed on 11 October 2023).
  28. Moulay, S. Chemical modification of poly(vinyl chloride)—Still on the run. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 303–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Skelly, P.W.; Li, L.; Braslau, R. Internal plasticization of PVC. Polym. Rev. 2022, 62, 485–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lieberzeit, P.; Bekchanov, D.; Mukhamedie, M. Polyvinyl chloride modifications, properties, and applications: Review. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2022, 33, 1809–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Babinsky, R. PVC additives: A global review. Plast. Addit. Compd. 2006, 8, 38–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ambrogi, A.; Carfagna, C.; Cerruti, P.; Marturano, V. Additives in Polymers. In Modification of Polymer Properties; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Chapter 4, pp. 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Elgharbawy, A.S. Poly Vinyl Chloride Additives and Applications—A Review. J. Risk Anal. Crisis Response 2022, 12, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mark, J.E. (Ed.) Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  35. PPI TR-19. The Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. TR-19. Chemical Resistance of Plastic Piping Materials. 28 April 2023. Available online: https://www.plasticpipe.org/ (accessed on 11 October 2023).
  36. Grause, G.; Hirahashi, S.; Toyoda, H.; Kameda, T.; Yoshioka, T. Solubility parameters for determining optimal solvents for separating PVC from PVC-coated PET fibers. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2015, 19, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kameda, T.; Fukuda, Y.; Grause, G.; Yoshioka, T. Chemical modification of rigid poly(vinyl chloride) by the substitution with nucleophiles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 116, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kameda, T.; Ono, M.; Grause, G.; Mizoguchi, T.; Yoshioka, T. Chemical modification of poly(vinyl chloride) by nucleophilic substitution. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2009, 94, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bacaloglu, R.; Fisch, M. Reaction mechanism of poly(vinyl chloride) degradation. Molecular orbital calculations. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 1995, 1, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ge, X.; Starnes, W.H. Chlorination of poly(vinyl chloride) model compounds in radical-complexing solvents. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2016, 22, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zakharyan, E.M.; Petrukhina, N.N.; Dzhabarov, E.G.; Maksimov, A.L. Pathways of Chemical Recycling of Polyvinyl Chloride. Part 2. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2020, 93, 1445–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zakharyan, E.M.; Petrukhina, N.N.; Maksimov, A.L. Pathways of Chemical Recycling of Polyvinyl Chloride: Part 1. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2020, 93, 1271–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lewandowski, K.; Skórczewska, K. A Brief Review of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Recycling. Polymers 2022, 14, 3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Colzi, I.; Renna, L.; Bianchi, E.; Castellani, M.B.; Coppi, A.; Pignattelli, S.; Loppi, S.; Gonnelli, C. Impact of microplastics on growth, photosynthesis and essential elements in Cucurbita pepo L. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 127238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pospíšil, J.; Horák, Z.; Kruliš, Z.; Nešpůrek, S.; Kuroda, S. Degradation and aging of polymer blends I. Thermomechanical and thermal degradation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1999, 65, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Carroll, W.F., Jr.; Berger, T.C.; Borrelli, F.E.; Garrity, P.J.; Jacobs, R.A.; Ledvina, J.; Lewis, J.W.; McCreedy, R.L.; Smith, T.P.; Tuhovak, D.R.; et al. Characterization of emissions of dioxins and furans from ethylene dichloride, vinyl chloride monomer and polyvinyl chloride facilities in the United States. Consolidated report. Chemosphere 2001, 43, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Available online: https://oxoplast.com/stabilnosc-polichlorku-winylu/ (accessed on 12 October 2023).
  48. Rodrigues, M.O.; Abrantes, N.; Gonçalves, F.J.M.; Nogueira, H.; Marques, J.C.; Gonçalves, A.M.M. Impacts of plastic products used in daily life on the environment and human health: What is known? Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 72, 103239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, W.; Gong, Y.; McKie, M.; Almuhtaram, H.; Sun, J.; Barrett, H.; Yang, D.; Wu, M.; Andrews, R.C.; Peng, H. Defining the chemical additives driving in vitro toxicities of plastics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 14627–14639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yuan, Z.; Nag, R.; Cummins, E. Human health concerns regarding microplastics in the aquatic environment—From marine to food systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 823, 153730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wagoner, J.K. Toxicity of vinyl chloride and poly(vinyl chloride): A critical review. Environ. Health Perspect. 1983, 52, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Huang, C.-Y.; Huang, K.-L.; Cheng, T.-J.; Wang, J.-D.; Hsieh, L.-L. The GST T1 and CYP2E1 genotypes are possible factors causing vinyl chloride induced abnormal liver function. Archiv. Toxicol. 1997, 71, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sass, J.B.; Castleman, B.; Wallinga, D. Vinyl Chloride: A Case study of data suppression and misrepresentation. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kapp, R.W. Vinyl chloride. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 934–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mahadevan, G.; Valiyaveettil, S. Comparison of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of polyvinyl chloride and poly(methyl methacrylate) nanoparticles on normal human lung cell lines. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2021, 34, 1468–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Stock, V.; Laurisch, C.; Franke, J.; Dönmez, M.H.; Voss, L.; Böhmert, L.; Braeuning, A.; Sieg, H. Uptake and cellular effects of PE, PP, PET and PVC microplastic particles. Toxicol. In Vitro 2021, 70, 105021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Paul, M.B.; Fahrenson, C.; Givelet, L.; Herrmann, T.; Loeschner, K.; Böhmert, L.; Thünemann, A.F.; Braeuning, A.; Sieg, H. Beyond microplastics—Investigation on health impacts of submicron and nanoplastic particles after oral uptake in vitro. Microplastics Nanoplastics 2022, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guardiola, J.J.; Beier, J.I.; Falkner, K.C.; Wheeler, B.; McClain, C.J.; Cave, M. Occupational exposures at a polyvinyl chloride production facility are associated with significant changes to the plasma metabolome. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2016, 313, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kumar, R.; Manna, C.; Padha, S.; Verma, A.; Sharma, P.; Dhar, A.; Ghosh, A.; Bhattacharya, P. Micro(nano)plastics pollution and human health: How plastics can induce carcinogenesis to humans? Chemosphere 2022, 298, 134267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Oleru, U.G.; Onyekwere, C. Exposures to polyvinyl chloride, methyl ketone and other chemicals—The pulmonary and non-pulmonary effect. Int. Archiv. Occup. Environ. Health 1992, 63, 503–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xu, H.; Hoet, P.H.; Nemery, B. In vitro toxicity assessment of polyvinyl chloride particles and comparison of six cellular systems. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2002, 65, 1141–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zelko, I.N.; Taylor, B.S.; Das, T.P.; Watson, W.H.; Sithu, I.D.; Wahlang, B.; Malovichko, M.V.; Cave, M.C.; Srivastava, S. Effect of vinyl chloride exposure on cardiometabolic toxicity. Environ. Toxicol. 2022, 37, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ju, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Gao, F.; Jiang, F.; Li, J.; Sun, C. Probing the toxic interactions between polyvinyl chloride microplastics and Human Serum Albumin by multispectroscopic techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 734, 139219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ju, P.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, J.; Jiang, F.; Sun, C.; Jiang, F.; Sun, C. New insights into the toxic interactions of polyvinyl chloride microplastics with bovine serum albumin. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 5520–5531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, X.; Zhuang, J.; Chen, Q.; Xu, L.; Yue, X.; Qiao, D. Chronic exposure to polyvinyl chloride microplastics induces liver injury and gut microbiota dysbiosis based on the integration of liver transcriptome profiles and full-length 16S rRNA sequencing data. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 839, 155984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, X.; Zhuang, J.; Chen, Q.; Xu, L.; Yue, X.; Qiao, D. Polyvinyl chloride microplastics induced gut barrier dysfunction, microbiota dysbiosis and metabolism disorder in adult mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 241, 113809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Richards, R.J.; Desai, R.; Hext, P.M.; Rose, F.A. Biological reactivity of PVC dust. Nature 1975, 5519, 664–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sharman, M.; Rose, M.; Parker, I.; Mercer, A.; Castle, L.; Gilbert, J.; Startin, J. Migration from plasticized films into foods. 1. Migration of di-(2-ethylhexyl)adipate from PVC films during home-use and microwave cooking. Food Addit. Contam. 1987, 4, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sampson, J.; De Korte, D. Review DEHP-plasticised PVC: Relevance to blood services. Transfus. Med. 2011, 21, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Olkova, A. Toxicity of water after short-term contact with pvc materials depending on the temperature and components of the polymer composition. Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol. 2021, 22, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zimmermann, L.; Bartosova, Z.; Braun, K.; Oehlmann, J.; Völker, C.; Wagner, M. Plastic products leach chemicals that induce in vitrotoxicity under realistic use conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 11814–11823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fishbein, L. Toxicity of the components of poly(vinylchloride) polymers additives. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1983, 141, 113–136. [Google Scholar]
  73. Beiras, R.; Verdejo, E.; Campoy-López, P.; Vidal-Liñán, L. Aquatic toxicity of chemically defined microplastics can be explained by functional additives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yang, H.; Li, X.; Guo, M.; Cao, X.; Zheng, X.; Bao, D. UV-induced microplastics (MPs) aging leads to comprehensive toxicity. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 189, 114745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, W.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Li, Z. Impacts of microplastics addition on sediment environmental properties, enzymatic activities and bacterial diversity. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shue, M.F.; Liou, J.J.; Tasi, J.L.; Tang, H.C.; Huang, W.J.; Liao, M.H. Cytotoxicity studies on combustion gas of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resin. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2009, 9, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sokolova, Y.; Gotlib, E.; Kozhevnikov, R.; Sokolova, A. Modification of PVC-compositions for linoleum. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 365, 032021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gotlib, E.; Sadykova, D.; Vdovina, T.; Galeeva, L.; Sokolova, A. Evaluation of bactericidal properties of PVC-compositions for linoleum production. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 97, 02001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tran, V.Q.C.; Le, D.V.; Yntema, D.R.; Havinga, P.J.M. A Review of Inspection Methods for Continuously Monitoring PVC Drinking Water Mains. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 14336–14354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bottausci, S.; Ungureanu-Comanita, E.-D.; Gavrilescu, M.; Bonoli, A. Environmental impacts quantification of pvc production. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2021, 20, 1693–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lakshmanan, S.; Murugesan, T. The chlor-alkali process: Work in progress. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2014, 16, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sustainable Solution Corporation. Life Cycle Assessment of PVC Water and Sewer Pipe and Comparative Sustainability Analysis of Pipe Materials. 2017. Available online: https://www.uni-bell.org/files/Reports/Life_Cycle_Assessment_of_PVC_Water_and_Sewer_Pipe_and_Comparative_Sustainability_Analysis_of_Pipe_Materials.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2023).
  83. Shi, S.Q.; Cai, L.; Weng, Y.; Wang, D.; Sun, Y. Comparative life-cycle assessment of water supply pipes made from bamboo vs. polyvinyl chloride. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Comaniţă, E.-D.; Ghinea, C.; Roşca, M.; Simion, I.M.; MPetraru, M.; Gavrilescu, M. Environmental impacts of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) production process. In Proceedings of the 2015 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference, Iasi, Romania, 19–21 November 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ye, L.; Qi, C.; Hong, J.; Ma, X. Life cycle assessment of polyvinyl chloride production and its recyclability in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2965–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ren, H.; Zhou, W.; Makowski, M.; Yan, H.; Yu, Y.; Ma, T. Incorporation of life cycle emissions and carbon price uncertainty into the supply chain network management of PVC production. Ann. Oper. Res. 2021, 300, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Marcilla, A.; García, S.; García-Quesada, J.C. Study of the migration of PVC plasticizers. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2004, 71, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yan, Y.; Zhu, F.; Zhu, C.; Chen, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, C.; Gu, C. Dibutyl phthalate release from polyvinyl chloride microplastics: Influence of plastic properties and environmental factors. Water Res. 2021, 204, 117597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ye, X.; Wang, P.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Sheng, Y.; Lao, K. Microplastic acts as a vector for contaminants: The release behavior of dibutyl phthalate from polyvinyl chloride pipe fragments in water phase. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 42082–42091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Skjevrak, I.; Due, A.; Gjerstad, K.O.; Herikstad, H. Volatile organic components migrating from plastic pipes (HDPE, PEX and PVC) into drinking water. Water Res. 2003, 37, 1912–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fayad, N.M.; Sheikheldin, S.Y.; Al-Malack, M.H.; El-Mubarak, A.H.; Khaja, N. Migration of vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) and additives into PVC bottled drinking water. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Environ. Sci. Eng. Toxicol. 1997, 32, 1065–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Henkel, C.; Hüffer, T.; Hofmann, T. Polyvinyl Chloride Microplastics Leach Phthalates into the Aquatic Environment over Decades. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 14507–14516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chong, N.S.; Abdulramoni, S.; Patterson, D.; Brown, H. Releases of Fire-Derived Contaminants from Polymer Pipes Made of Polyvinyl Chloride. Toxics 2019, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fernández-González, V.; Andrade-Garda, J.M.; López-Mahía, P.; Muniategui-Lorenzo, S. Misidentification of PVC microplastics in marine environmental samples. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 153, 116649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mai, L.; Bao, L.J.; Shi, L.; Wong, C.S.; Zeng, E.Y. A review of methods for measuring microplastics in aquatic environments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 11319–11332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cutroneo, L.; Reboa, A.; Besio, G.; Borgogno, F.; Canesi, L.; Canuto, S.; Dara, M.; Enrile, F.; Forioso, I.; Greco, G.; et al. Microplastics in seawater: Sampling strategies, laboratory methodologies, and identification techniques applied to port environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 8938–8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kavya, A.N.V.L.; Sundarrajan, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Identification and characterization of micro-plastics in the marine environment: A mini review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 160, 111704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Pan, Z.; Guo, H.; Chen, H.; Wang, S.; Sun, X.; Zou, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Cai, S.; Huang, J. Microplastics in the Northwestern Pacific: Abundance, distribution, and characteristics. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650 Pt 2, 1913–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Facchetti, S.V.; La Spina, R.; Fumagalli, F.; Riccardi, N.; Gilliland, D.; Ponti, J. Detection of Metal-Doped Fluorescent PVC Microplastics in Freshwater Mussels. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Suman, K.H.; Haque, M.N.; Uddin, M.J.; Begum, M.S.; Sikder, M.H. Toxicity and biomarkers of micro-plastic in aquatic environment: A review. Biomarkers 2021, 26, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yin, L.; Jiang, C.; Wen, X.; Du, C.; Zhong, W.; Feng, Z.; Long, Y.; Ma, Y. Microplastic Pollution in Surface Water of Urban Lakes in Changsha, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shen, M.; Zeng, Z.; Wen, X.; Ren, X.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, R. Presence of microplastics in drinking water from freshwater sources: The investigation in Changsha, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 42313–42324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Mintenig, S.M.; Löder, M.G.J.; Primpke, S.; Gerdts, G. Low numbers of microplastics detected in drinking water from ground water sources. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 648, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ding, J.; Jiang, F.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Sun, C.; Wang, Z.; Fu, L.; Ding, N.X.; He, C. Microplastics in the Coral Reef Systems from Xisha Islands of South China Sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 8036–8046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Fan, Y.; Zheng, K.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, G.; Peng, X. Distribution, sedimentary record, and persistence of microplastics in the Pearl River catchment, China. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 251, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yan, M.; Nie, H.; Xu, K.; He, Y.; Hu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wang, J. Microplastic abundance, distribution and composition in the Pearl River along Guangzhou city and Pearl River estuary, China. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Xiong, X.; Liu, Q.; Chen, X.; Wang, R.; Duan, M.; Wu, C. Occurrence of microplastic in the water of different types of aquaculture ponds in an important lakeside freshwater aquaculture area of China. Chemosphere 2021, 282, 131126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Jiang, C.; Yin, L.; Wen, X.; Du, C.; Wu, L.; Long, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Yin, Q.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Microplastics in Sediment and Surface Water of West Dongting Lake and South Dongting Lake: Abundance, Source and Composition. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, W.; Yuan, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J. Microplastics in surface waters of Dongting Lake and Hong Lake, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chae, D.-H.; Kim, I.-S.; Kim, S.-K.; Song, Y.K.; Shim, W.J. Abundance and Distribution Characteristics of Microplastics in Surface Seawaters of the Incheon/Kyeonggi Coastal Region. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 69, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Song, Y.K.; Hong, S.H.; Jang, M.; Han, G.M.; Shim, W.J. Occurrence and Distribution of Microplastics in the Sea Surface Microlayer in Jinhae Bay, South Korea. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 69, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tunçer, S.; Artüz, O.B.; Demirkol, M.; Artüz, M.L. First report of occurrence, distribution, and composition of microplastics in surface waters of the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 135, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Khalik, W.M.A.W.M.; Ibrahim, Y.S.; Anuar, S.T.; Govindasamy, S.; Baharuddin, N.F. Microplastics analysis in Malaysian marine waters: A field study of Kuala Nerus and Kuantan. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 135, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Morgana, S.; Ghigliotti, L.; Estévez-Calvar, N.; Stifanese, R.; Wieckzorek, A.; Doyle, T.; Christiansen, J.S.; Faimali, M.; Garaventa, F. Microplastics in the Arctic: A case study with sub-surface water and fish samples off Northeast Greenland. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 1078–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Lusher, A.; Tirelli, V.; O’Connor, I.; Officer, R. Microplastics in Arctic polar waters: The first reported values of particles in surface and sub-surface samples. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Lefebvre, C.; Saraux, C.; Heitz, O.; Nowaczyk, A.; Bonnet, D. Microplastics FTIR characterisation and distribution in the water column and digestive tracts of small pelagic fish in the Gulf of Lions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 142, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Dai, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Q.; Tian, Y.; Chen, T.; Tu, C.; Fu, C.; Luo, Y. Occurrence of microplastics in the water column and sediment in an inland sea affected by intensive anthropogenic activities. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zeri, C.; Adamopoulou, A.; Bojanić Varezić, D.; Fortibuoni, T.; Kovač Viršek, M.; Kržan, A.; Mandic, M.; Mazziotti, C.; Palatinus, A.; Peterlin, M.; et al. Floating plastics in Adriatic waters (Mediterranean Sea): From the macro- to the micro-scale. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 136, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Palatinus, A.; Kovač Viršek, M.; Robič, U.; Grego, M.; Bajt, O.; Šiljić, J.; Suaria, G.; Liubartseva, S.; Coppini, G.; Peterlin, M. Marine litter in the Croatian part of the middle Adriatic Sea: Simultaneous assessment of floating and seabed macro and micro litter abundance and composition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 139, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. de Haan, W.P.; Sanchez-Vidal, A.; Canals, M. Floating microplastics and aggregate formation in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 140, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Syakti, A.D.; Bouhroum, R.; Hidayati, N.V.; Koenawan, C.J.; Boulkamh, A.; Sulistyo, I.; Lebarillier, S.; Akhlus, S.; Doumenq, P.; Wong-Wah-Chung, P. Beach macro-litter monitoring and floating microplastic in a coastal area of Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 122, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Su, L.; Sharp, S.M.; Pettigrove, V.J.; Craig, N.J.; Nan, B.; Du, F.; Shi, H. Superimposed microplastic pollution in a coastal metropolis. Water Res. 2020, 168, 115140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ferreira, M.; Thompson, J.; Paris, A.; Rohindra, D.; Rico, C. Presence of microplastics in water, sediments and fish species in an urban coastal environment of Fiji, a Pacific small island developing state. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 153, 110991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kanhai, L.D.K.; Johansson, C.; Frias, J.P.G.L.; Gardfeldt, K.; Thompson, R.C.; O’Connor, I. Deep sea sediments of the Arctic Central Basin: A potential sink for microplastics. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2019, 145, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Gomiero, A.; Øysæd, K.B.; Agustsson, T.; van Hoytema, N.; van Thiel, T.; Grati, F. First record of characterization, concentration and distribution of microplastics in coastal sediments of an urban fjord in south west Norway using a thermal degradation method. Chemosphere 2019, 227, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Vianello, A.; Boldrin, A.; Guerriero, P.; Moschino, V.; Rella, R.; Sturaro, A.; Da Ros, L. Microplastic particles in sediments of Lagoon of Venice, Italy: First observations on occurrence, spatial patterns and identification. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2013, 130, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Nor, N.H.M.; Obbard, J.P. Microplastics in Singapore’s coastal mangrove ecosystems. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 79, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Vilakati, B.; Sivasankar, V.; Mamba, B.B.; Omine, K.; Msagati, T.A.M. Characterization of plastic micro particles in the Atlantic Ocean seashore of Cape Town, South Africa and mass spectrometry analysis of pyrolyzate products. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lozoya, J.P.; Teixeira de Mello, F.; Carrizo, D.; Weinstein, F.; Olivera, Y.; Cedrés, F.; Pereira, M.; Fossati, M. Plastics and microplastics on recreational beaches in Punta del Este (Uruguay): Unseen critical residents? Environ. Pollut. 2016, 218, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bucol, L.A.; Romano, E.F.; Cabcaban, S.M.; Siplon, L.M.D.; Madrid, G.C.; Bucol, A.A.; Polidoro, B. Microplastics in marine sediments and rabbitfish (Siganus fuscescens) from selected coastal areas of Negros Oriental, Philippines. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 150, s110685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hara, J.; Frias, J.; Nash, R. Quantification of microplastic ingestion by the decapod crustacean Nephrops norvegicus from Irish waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 152, 110905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wootton, N.; Ferreira, M.; Gillanders, B. A comparison of microplastic in fish from Australia and Fiji. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 690991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fang, C.; Zheng, R.; Chen, H.; Hong, F.; Lin, L.; Lin, H.; Guo, H.; Bailey, C.; Segner, H.; Mu, J.; et al. Comparison of microplastic contamination in fish and bivalves from two major cities in Fujian province, China and the implications for human health. Aquaculture 2019, 512, 734322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Phuong, N.N.; Zalouk-Vergnoux, A.; Kamari, A.; Mouneyrac, C.; Amiard, F.; Poirier, L.; Lagarde, F. Quantification and characterization of microplastics in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis): Protocol setup and preliminary data on the contamination of the French Atlantic coast. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 6135–6144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Saha, M.; Naik, A.; Desai, A.; Nanajkar, M.; Rathore, C.; Kumar, M.; Gupta, P. Microplastics in seafood as an emerging threat to marine environment: A case study in Goa, west coast of India. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 129359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Capolupo, M.; Sørensen, L.; Jayasena, K.D.R.; Booth, A.M.; Fabbri, E. Chemical composition and ecotoxicity of plastic and car tire rubber leachates to aquatic organisms. Water Res. 2020, 169, 115270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ding, L.; Mao, R.; Guo, X.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, C. Microplastics in surface waters and sediments of the Wei River, in the northwest of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 667, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Canesi, L.; Fabbri, E. Environmental Effects of BPA: Focus on Aquatic Species. Dose-Response 2015, 13, 1559325815598304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sree, C.G.; Buddolla, V.; Lakshmi, B.A.; Kim, Y.-J. Phthalate toxicity mechanisms: An update. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 263, 109498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. United Nations Environment Programme. Overview Report II: An Overview of Current Scientific Knowledge on the Life Cycles, Environmental Exposures, and Environmental Effects of Select Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) and Potential EDCs. 2017. Available online: https://Wedocs.Unep.Org/20.500.11822/25634 (accessed on 16 October 2023).
  141. Akovali, G. 2—Plastic materials: Polyvinyl chloride (PVC). In Toxicity of Building Materials; Pacheco-Torgal, F., Jalali, S., Fucic, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering; Woodhead Publishing: Elston, UK, 2012; pp. 23–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chen, L.; Qi, H.; Yu, K.; Gao, B. Increased bio-toxicity of leachates from polyvinyl chloride microplastics during the photo-aging process in the presence of dissolved organic matter. Water Sci. Technol. 2023, 88, 2465–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Tekman, M.B.; Walther, B.A.; Peter, C.; Gutow, L.; Bergmann, M. Impacts of Plastic Pollution in the Oceans on Marine Species, Biodiversity and Ecosystems; WWF Germany: Berlin, Germany, 2022; pp. 1–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Waring, R.H.; Harris, R.M.; Mitchell, S.C. Plastic contamination of the food chain: A threat to human health? Maturitas 2018, 115, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Choi, D.; Kim, C.; Kim, T.; Park, K.; Im, J.; Hong, J. Potential threat of microplastics to humans: Toxicity prediction modeling by small data analysis. Environ. Sci. Nano 2023, 10, 1096–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wang, Q.; Wangjin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, N.; Wang, Y.; Meng, G.; Chen, Y. The toxicity of virgin and UV-aged PVC microplastics on the growth of freshwater algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 749, 141603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Ouyang, D.; Lei, J.; Tan, Q.; Xie, L.; Li, Z.; Liu, T.; Xiao, Y.; Farooq, T.H.; et al. Systematical review of interactions between microplastics and microorganisms in the soil environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Wright, S.L.; Thompson, R.C.; Galloway, T.S. The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 178, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Halden, R.U. Plastics and Health Risks. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2010, 31, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Zimmermann, L.; Göttlich, S.; Oehlmann, J.; Wagner, M.; Völker, C. What are the drivers of microplastic toxicity? Comparing the toxicity of plastic chemicals and particles to Daphnia magna. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 267, 115392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Vijayaraghavan, G.; Neethu, K.V.; Aneesh, B.P.; Suresh, A.; Saranya, K.S.; Bijoy Nandan, S.; Sharma, K.V. Evaluation of toxicological impacts of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) microplastics on fish, Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790), Cochin estuary, India. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2022, 14, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Darabi, H.; Baradaran, A.; Ebrahimpour, K. Subacute toxic effects of polyvinyl chloride microplastics (PVC-MPs) in juvenile common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Casp. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 20, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Elizalde-Velázquez, G.A.; Gómez-Oliván, L.M. Microplastics in aquatic environments: A review on occurrence, distribution, toxic effects, and implications for human health. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 780, 146551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lamb, J.B.; Willis, B.L.; Fiorenza, E.A.; Couch, C.S.; Howard, R.; Rader, D.N.; True, J.D.; Kelly, L.A.; Ahmad, A.; Jompa, J.; et al. Plastic waste associated with disease on coral reefs. Science 2018, 359, 460–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Boyle, D.; Catarino, A.I.; Clark, N.J.; Henry, T.B. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic fragments release Pb additives that are bioavailable in zebrafish. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Chen, C.; Chen, L.; Yao, Y.; Artigas, F.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, W. Organotin release from polyvinyl chloride microplastics and concurrent photodegradation in water: Impacts from salinity, dissolved organic matter, and light exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 10741–10752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Brennecke, D.; Duarte, B.; Paiva, F.; Caçador, I.; Canning-Clode, J. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 178, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, W.; Lo, H.-S.; Wong, H.-M.; Zhou, M.; Wong, C.-Y.; Tam, N.F.-Y.; Cheung, S.-G. Heavy metals contamination of sedimentary microplastics in Hong Kong. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 153, 110977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Meem, R.A.; Ahmed, A.; Maraz, K.M.; Md. Shamim Hossain Khan, R.A. A Review on the Impact of Plastic Debris on Marine Environment. Mod. Concepts Mater. Sci. 2021, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  160. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, H.; Cai, J.; Sultan, Y.; Fang, H.; Zhang, B.; Ma, J. Effects of polyvinyl chloride microplastics on reproduction, oxidative stress and reproduction and detoxification-related genes in Daphnia magna. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2022, 254, 109269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Cao, W.; Sun, C.; Ju, P.; Zheng, L. The interactions between microplastic polyvinyl chloride and marine diatoms: Physiological, morphological, and growth effects. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 111000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Smith, M.D.; Grant, M.H.; Blass, C.R.; Courtney, J.M.; Barbenel, J.C. Poly(vinyl chloride) formulations: Acute toxicity to cultured human cell lines. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 1996, 7, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zhang, C.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Tan, L. Toxic effects of microplastic on marine microalgae Skeletonema costatum: Interactions between microplastic and algae. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 220, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Rocha, R.J.M.; Rodrigues, A.C.M.; Campos, D.; Cícero, L.H.; Costa, A.P.L.; Silva, D.A.M.; Oliveira, M.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Patrício Silva, A.L. Do microplastics affect the zoanthid Zoanthus sociatus? Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Zhou, J.; Cao, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, H.; Li, W. Bladder entrance of microplastic likely induces toxic effects in carnivorous macrophyte Utricularia aurea Lour. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 32124–32131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Rist, S.E.; Assidqi, K.; Zamani, N.P.; Appel, D.; Perschke, M.; Huhn, M.; Lenz, M. Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel Perna viridis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 111, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Gomiero, A.; Strafella, P.; Øysæd, K.B.; Fabi, G. First occurrence and composition assessment of microplastics in native mussels collected from coastal and offshore areas of the northern and central Adriatic Sea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 24407–24416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Renzi, M.; Grazioli, E.; Blašković, A. Effects of different microplastic types and surfactant-microplastic mixtures under fasting and feeding conditions: A case study on Daphnia magna. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 103, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Iheanacho, S.C.; Odo, G.E. Neurotoxicity, oxidative stress biomarkers and haematological responses in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) exposed to polyvinyl chloride microparticles. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2020, 232, 108741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Xia, X.; Sun, M.; Zhou, M.; Chang, Z.; Li, L. Polyvinyl chloride microplastics induce growth inhibition and oxidative stress in Cyprinus carpio var. larvae. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 136479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Espinosa, C.; Esteban, M.Á.; Cuesta, A. Dietary administration of PVC and PE microplastics produces histological damage, oxidative stress and immunoregulation in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 95, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Peda, C.; Caccamo, L.; Fossi, M.C.; Gai, F.; Andaloro, F.; Genovese, L.; Perdichizzi, A.; Romeo, T.; Maricchiolo, G. Intestinal alterations in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus, 1758) exposed to microplastics: Preliminary results. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 212, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Espinosa, C.; Cuesta, A.; Esteban, M.Á. Effects of dietary polyvinylchloride microparticles on general health, immune status and expression of several genes related to stress in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 68, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kirstein, I.V.; Hensel, F.; Gomiero, A.; Iordachescu, L.; Vianello, A.; Wittgren, H.B.; Vollertsen, J. Drinking plastics?—Quantification and qualification of microplastics in drinking water distribution systems by µFTIR and Py-GCMS. Water Res. 2021, 188, 116519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Pivokonský, M.; Pivokonská, L.; Novotná, K.; Čermáková, L.; Klimtová, M. Occurrence and fate of microplastics at two different drinking water treatment plants within a river catchment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 140236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Pivokonsky, M.; Cermakova, L.; Novotna, K.; Peer, P.; Cajthaml, T.; Janda, V. Occurrence of microplastics in raw and treated drinking water. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 1644–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Ibeto, C.N.; Enyoh, C.E.; Ofomatah, A.C.; Oguejiofor, L.A.; Okafocha, T.; Okanya, V. Microplastics pollution indices of bottled water from South Eastern Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2021, 103, 8176–8195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zhou, X.J.; Wang, J.; Li, H.Y.; Zhang, H.M.; Zhang, D.L. Microplastic pollution of bottled water in China. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 40, 101884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Stapleton, P.A. Microplastic and nanoplastic transfer, accumulation, and toxicity in humans. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2021, 28, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wright, S.L.; Kelly, F.J. Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6634–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Cox, K.D.; Covernton, G.A.; Davies, H.L.; Dower, J.F.; Juanes, F.; Dudas, S.E. Human Consumption of Microplastics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 7068–7074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Gola, D.; Kumar Tyagi, P.; Arya, A.; Chauhan, N.; Agarwal, M.; Singh, S.K.; Gola, S. The impact of microplastics on marine environment: A review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Smith, M.; Love, D.C.; Rochman, C.M.; Neff, R.A. Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human Health. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2018, 5, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Wendee, N. Microplastics in Seafood: How Much Are People Eating? Environ. Health Perspect. 2023, 129, 34001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Fischer, M.; Goßmann, I.; Scholz-Böttcher, B.M. Fleur de Sel—An interregional monitor for microplastics mass load and composition in European coastal waters? J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2019, 144, 104711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Danopoulos, E.; Jenner, L.; Twiddy, M.; Rotchell, J.M. Microplastic contamination of salt intended for human consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Rillig, M.C.; Lehmann, A.; de Souza Machado, A.A.; Yang, G. Microplastic effects on plants. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 1066–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Fan, P.; Tan, W.; Yu, H. Effects of different concentrations and types of microplastics on bacteria and fungi in alkaline soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 229, 113045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Peixoto, J.; Silva, L.P.; Krüger, R.H. Brazilian Cerrado soil reveals an untapped microbial potential for unpretreated polyethylene biodegradation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 324, 634–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Rajagopalan, K.; Christyraj, J.R.S.S.; Karthikeyan, S.C.; Jeevanandam, M.; Ganesan, H.; Mathews, M.G.R.; Selvan Christyraj, J.D. Chapter 29—Biodegradation of microplastics and synthetic polymers in agricultural soils. In Microbes and Microbial Biotechnology for Green Remediation; Malik, J.A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Xiu, F.-R.; Lu, Y.; Qi, Y. DEHP degradation and dechlorination of polyvinyl chloride waste in subcritical water with alkali and ethanol: A comparative study. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Alabi, O.A.; Ologbonjaye, K.I.; Awosolu, O.; Alalade, O.E. Public and Environmental Health Effects of Plastic Wastes Disposal: A Review. J. Toxicol. Risk Assess. 2019, 5, 021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Xu, B.; Liu, F.; Brookes, P.C.; Xu, J. Microplastics play a minor role in tetracycline sorption in the presence of dissolved organic matter. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Tang, K.H.D. Effects of Microplastics on Agriculture: A Mini-review. Asian J. Environ. Ecol. 2020, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Tian, X.; Fan, H.; Wang, J.; Ippolito, J.; Li, Y.; Feng, S.; An, M.; Zhang, F.; Wang, K. Effect of polymer materials on soil structure and organic carbon under drip irrigation. Geoderma 2019, 340, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Meng, J.; Li, W.; Diao, C.; Li, Z.; Zhao, J.; Haider, G.; Zhang, H.; Xu, J.; Hu, M.; Shan, S.; et al. Microplastics drive microbial assembly, their interactions, and metagenomic functions in two soils with distinct pH and heavy metal availability. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 458, 131973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Huang, S.; Guo, T.; Feng, Z.; Li, B.; Cai, Y.; Ouyang, D.; Gustave, W.; Ying, C.; Zhang, H. Polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride microplastics promote soil nitrification and alter the composition of key nitrogen functional bacterial groups. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 453, 131391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Shen, H.; Sun, Y.; Duan, H.; Ye, J.; Zhou, A.; Meng, H.; Zhu, F.; He, H.; Gu, C. Effect of PVC microplastics on soil microbial community and nitrogen availability under laboratory-controlled and field-relevant temperatures. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 184, 104794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Sun, Y.; Ren, X.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Tsui, T.-H.; Luo, L.; Wang, Q. Effect of microplastics on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions during aerobic composting. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 139856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Zhu, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, D.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.; He, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Zhan, X. Microplastic particles alter wheat rhizosphere soil microbial community composition and function. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 436, 129176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Dainelli, M.; Pignattelli, S.; Bazihizina, N.; Falsini, S.; Papini, A.; Baccelli, I.; Mancuso, S.; Coppi, A.; Castellani, M.B.; Colzi, I.; et al. Can microplastics threaten plant productivity and fruit quality? Insights from Micro-Tom and Micro-PET/PVC. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 895, 165119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Alharbi, K.; Aqeel, M.; Khalid, N.; Nazir, A.; Irshad, M.K.; Alzuaibr, F.M.; AlHaithloul, H.A.; Akhter, N.; Al-Zoubi, O.M.; Qasim, M.; et al. Microplastics in soil differentially interfere with nutritional aspects of chilli peppers. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 160, 402–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Rillig, M.C.; Ziersch, L.; Hempel, S. Microplastic transport in soil by earthworms. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Rillig, M.C.; Bonkowski, M. Microplastic and soil protists: A call for research. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 241, 1128–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Lei, L.; Wu, S.; Lu, S.; Liu, M.; Song, Y.; Fu, Z.; Shi, H.; Raley-Susman, K.M.; He, D. Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 619–620, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Kokalj, A.J.; Horvat, P.; Skalar, T.; Kržan, A. Plastic bag and facial cleanser derived microplastic do not affect feeding behaviour and energy reserves of terrestrial isopods. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. European Commission. Green Paper—Environmental Issues of PVC. 2000. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52000DC0469 (accessed on 16 October 2023).
  208. VinylPlus. Progress Report. Reporting on 2017 Activities. 2018. Available online: https://vinylplus.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/VinylPlus-Progress-Report-2018-PbyP.pdf (accessed on 27 October 2018).
  209. Takeshita, T.; Kato, K.; Takahashi, K.K.; Sato, Y.; Nishi, S. Basic study on treatment of waste polyvinyl chloride plastics by hydrothermal decomposition in subcritical and supercritical regions. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2004, 31, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Lu, L.; Kumagai, S.; Kameda, T.; Luo, L.; Yoshioka, T. Degradation of PVC waste into a flexible polymer by chemical modification using DINP moieties. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 28870–28875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Li, T.; Zhao, P.; Lei, M.; Li, Z. Understanding Hydrothermal Dechlorination of PVC by Focusing on the Operating Conditions and Hydrochar Characteristics. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Yousif, E.; Hasan, A. Photostabilization of poly(vinyl chloride)—Still on the run. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2015, 9, 421–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Sadat-Shojai, M.; Bakhshandeh, G.-R. Recycling of PVC wastes. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 404–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Vivi, V.K.; Martins-Franchetti, S.M.; Attili-Angelis, D. Biodegradation of PCL and PVC: Chaetomium globosum (ATCC 16021) activity. Folia Microbiol. 2019, 64, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Giacomucci, L.; Raddadi, N.; Soccio, M.; Lotti, N.; Fava, F. Polyvinyl chloride biodegradation by Pseudomonas citronellolis and Bacillus flexus. N. Biotechnol. 2019, 52, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Tsochatzis, E.; Lopes, J.A.; Gika, H.; Theodoridis, G. Polystyrene biodegradation by Tenebrio molitor larvae: Identification of generated substances using a GC-MS untargeted screening method. Polymers 2021, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Restrepo-Flórez, J.-M.; Bassi, A.; Thompson, M.R. Microbial degradation and deterioration of polyethylene—A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 88, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Zhao, P.; Li, T.; Yan, W.; Yuan, L. Dechlorination of PVC wastes by hydrothermal treatment using alkaline additives. Environ. Technol. 2018, 39, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Xiu, F.-R.; Zhou, K.; Qi, Y. Co-treatment of PVC and used LCD panels in low-temperature subcritical water: Enhanced dechlorination and mechanism. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 151, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Yuan, G.; Chen, D.; Yin, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Wang, J.Y. High efficiency chlorine removal from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pyrolysis with a gas–liquid fluidized bed reactor. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 1045–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Yang, R.; Zhao, Z.; Pu, Y.; Xiao, K.; Liu, R.; Cao, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Study of the photoaging process of polyvinyl chloride in different media with the electrical sensing zone method. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2023, 65, 103073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Decker, C. Photodegradation of PVC. In Degradation and Stabilisation of PVC; Owen, E.D., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1984; pp. 81–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Sil, D.; Chakrabarti, S. Photocatalytic degradation of PVC–ZnO composite film under tropical sunlight and artificial UV radiation: A comparative study. Sol. Energy 2010, 84, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Zhang, Y.; Sun, T.; Zhang, D.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Wang, L.; Song, J.; Lin, Q. Enhanced photodegradability of PVC plastics film by codoping nano-graphite and TiO2. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2020, 181, 109332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Ali, M.; Perveen, Q.; Ahmad, B.; Javed, I.; Razi-Ul-Hussnain, R.; Andleeb, S.; Atique, N.; Ghumro, P.B.; Ahmed, S.; Hameed, A. Studies on Biodegradation of Cellulose Blended Polyvinyl Chloride Films. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2009, 11, 577–580. [Google Scholar]
  226. Bahl, S.; Dolma, J.; Jyot Singh, J.; Sehgal, S. Biodegradation of plastics: A state of the art review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 39, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Alshehrei, F. Biodegradation of Synthetic and Natural Plastic by Microorganisms. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 5, 8–19. [Google Scholar]
  228. Giacomucci, L.; Raddadi, N.; Soccio, M.; Lotti, N.; Fava, F. Biodegradation of polyvinyl chloride plastic films by enriched anaerobic marine consortia. Mar. Environ. Res. 2020, 158, 104949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Sakhalkar, S.; Mishra, R.L. Screening and identification of soil fungi with potential of plastic degrading ability. Indian J. Appl. Res. 2013, 3, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Čolnik, M.; Kotnik, P.; Knez, Ž.; Škerget, M. Degradation of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Waste with Supercritical Water. Processes 2022, 10, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Yin, F.; Zhuang, Q.; Chang, T.; Zhang, C.; Sun, H.; Sun, Q.; Wang, C.; Li, L. Study on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of mixed plastic waste. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2021, 23, 1984–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Lu, L.; Li, W.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, M. Chemical recycling technologies for PVC waste and PVC-containing plastic waste: A review. Waste Manag. 2023, 166, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Baitz, M.; Kreißig, J.; Byrne, E.; Makishi, C.; Kupfer, T.; Frees, N.; Bey, N.; Hansen, M.S.; Hansen, A.; Bosch, T.; et al. Final Report: ”Life Cycle Assessment of PVC and of Principal Competing Materials”, Commissioned by the European Commission; European Commission: Luxembourg, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  234. Ali, M.F.; Siddiqui, M.N. Thermal and catalytic decomposition behavior of PVC mixed plastic waste with petroleum residue. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2005, 74, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Jiang, X.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, M. An overview on the recycling of waste poly(vinyl chloride). Green Chem. 2023, 25, 6971–7025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Lu, J.; Ma, S.; Gao, J. Study on the Pressurized Hydrolysis Dechlorination of PVC. Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 1251–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Ma, D.; Liang, L.; Hu, E.; Chen, H.; Wang, D.; He, C.; Feng, Q. Dechlorination of polyvinyl chloride by hydrothermal treatment with cupric ion. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 146, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Ammala, A.; Bateman, S.; Dean, K.; Petinakis, E.; Sangwan, P.; Wong, S.; Yuan, Q.; Yu, L.; Patrick, C.; Leong, K.H. An overview of degradable and biodegradable polyolefins. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1015–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Amobonye, A.E.; Bhagwat, P.; Singh, S.; Pillai, S. Chapter 10—Biodegradability of Polyvinyl chloride. In Biodegradability of Conventional Plastics; Sarkar, A., Sharma, B., Shekhar, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Ganesh, K.A.; Anjana, K.; Hinduja, M.; Sujitha, K.; Dharani, G. Review on plastic wastes in marine environment—Biodegradation and biotechnological solutions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 150, 110733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Ho, B.T.; Roberts, T.K.; Lucas, S. An overview on biodegradation of polystyrene and modified polystyrene: The microbial approach. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Zhang, Y.-T.; Wei, W.; Sun, J.; Xu, Q.; Ni, B.-J. Long-Term Effects of Polyvinyl Chloride Microplastics on Anaerobic Granular Sludge for Recovering Methane from Wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 9662–9671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Peng, B.-Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, J.; Yu, H.; Zhou, X.; Criddle, C.S.; Wu, W.-M.; Zhang, Y. Biodegradation of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) in Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) larvae. Environ. Int. 2020, 145, 106106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Klrbas, Z.; Güner, N.K.A. Biodegradation of Polyvinylchloride (PVC) by white rot fungi. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1999, 63, 335–342. [Google Scholar]
  245. Das, G.; Bordoloi, N.K.; Rai, S.K.; Mukherjee, A.K.; Karak, N. Biodegradable and biocompatible epoxidized vegetable oil modified thermostable poly(vinyl chloride): Thermal and performance characteristics post biodegradation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Achromobacter sp. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209–210, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Ali, M.I.; Ahmed, S.; Robson, G.; Javed, I.; Ali, N.; Atiq, N.; Hameed, A. Isolation and molecular characterization of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic degrading fungal isolates. J. Basic Microbiol. 2014, 54, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Khatoon, N.; Jamal, A.; Ali, M.I. Lignin peroxidase isoenzyme: A novel approach to biodegrade the toxic synthetic polymer waste. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 1366–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Zhang, Z.; Peng, H.; Yang, D.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, J.; Ju, F. Polyvinyl chloride degradation by a bacterium isolated from the gut of insect larvae. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Temporiti, M.E.; Nicola, L.; Nielsen, E.; Tosi, S. Fungal Enzymes Involved in Plastics Biodegradation. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Rad, M.M.; Moghimi, H.; Azin, E. Biodegradation of thermo-oxidative pretreated low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) microplastics by Achromobacter denitrificans Ebl13. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 181, 113830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Wertz, J.T.; Béchade, B. Chapter Three—Symbiont-mediated degradation of dietary carbon sources in social herbivorous insects. In Advances in Insect Physiology; Oliver, K.M., Russell, J.A., Eds.; Mechanisms Underlying Microbial Symbiosis; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 63–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Bożek, M.; Hanus-Lorenz, B.; Rybak, J. The studies on waste biodegradation by Tenebrio molitor. E3S Web Conf. 2017, 17, 00011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Xu, H.; Dinsdale, D.; Nemery, B.; Hoet, P.H.M. Role of residual additives in the cytotoxicity and cytokine release caused by polyvinyl chloride particles in pulmonary cell cultures. Toxicol. Sci. 2003, 72, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Khandare, S.D.; Chaudhary, D.R.; Jha, B. Bioremediation of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) films by marine bacteria. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 169, 112566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Patil, R.; Bagde, U.S. Isolation of polyvinyl chloride degrading bacterial strains from environmental samples using enrichment culture technique. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 7947–7956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Webb, J.S.; Nixon, M.; Eastwood, I.M.; Greenhalgh, M.; Robson, G.D.; Handley, P.S. Fungal Colonization and Biodeterioration of Plasticized Polyvinyl Chloride. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3194–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Ali, M.I.; Ahmed, S.; Javed, I.; Ali, N.; Atiq, N.; Hameed, A.; Robson, G. Biodegradation of starch blended polyvinyl chloride films by isolated Phanerochaete chrysosporium PV1. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Saeed, S.; Iqbal, A.; Deeba, F. Biodegradation study of Polyethylene and PVC using naturally occurring plastic degrading microbes. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Pardo-Rodríguez, M.L.; Zorro-Mateus, P.J.P. Biodegradation of polyvinyl chloride by Mucor sp. and Penicillium sp. isolated from soil. Rev. Investig. Desarro. Innov. 2021, 11, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Abdel-Naby, A.S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A. Poly(vinyl chloride) blend with biodegradable cellulose acetate in presence of N-(phenyl amino) maleimides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 70, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Kaczmarek, H.; Bajer, K. Biodegradation of plasticized poly(vinyl chloride) containing cellulose. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2007, 45, 903–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Danko, A.S.; Meizhong, L.; Bagwell, C.E.; Brigmon, R.L.; Freedman, D.L. Involvement of Linear Plasmids in Aerobic Biodegradation of Vinyl Chloride. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 6092–6097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Othman, A.R.; Hasan, H.A.; Muhamad, M.H.; ’Izzati Ismail, N.; Abdullah, S.R.S. Microbial degradation of microplastics by enzymatic processes: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3057–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Shimao, M.; Tamogami, T.; Kishida, S.; Harayama, S. The gene pvaB encodes oxidized polyvinyl alcohol hydrolase of Pseudomonas sp. strain VM15C and forms an operon with the polyvinyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene pvaAThe DDBJ accession number for the sequence reported in this paper is AB008494. Microbiology 2000, 146, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Yang, X.-G.; Wen, P.-P.; Yang, Y.-F.; Jia, P.-P.; Li, W.-G.; Pei, D.-S. Plastic biodegradation by in vitro environmental microorganisms and in vivo gut microorganisms of insects. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1001750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Sumathi, T.; Viswanath, B.; Lakshmi, A.S.; SaiGopal, D.V.R. Production of Laccase by Cochliobolus sp. isolated from plastic dumped soils and their ability to degrade low molecular weight PVC. Biochem. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 9519527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Wei, X.-F.; Capezza, A.J.; Cui, Y.; Li, L.; Hakonen, A.; Liu, B.; Hedenqvist, M.S. Millions of microplastics released from a biodegradable polymer during biodegradation/enzymatic hydrolysis. Water Res. 2022, 211, 118068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General structure of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC).
Figure 1. General structure of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC).
Materials 17 00173 g001
Figure 2. The free-radical polymerization of vinyl chloride (VC) (m = n + 1).
Figure 2. The free-radical polymerization of vinyl chloride (VC) (m = n + 1).
Materials 17 00173 g002
Figure 3. Reaction paths of PVC: the nucleophilic substitution of chloride atom (1), nucleophilic elimination of hydrogen chloride, (2) and free-radical chlorination (3).
Figure 3. Reaction paths of PVC: the nucleophilic substitution of chloride atom (1), nucleophilic elimination of hydrogen chloride, (2) and free-radical chlorination (3).
Materials 17 00173 g003
Figure 4. The degradation of PVC by dehydrochlorination reactions.
Figure 4. The degradation of PVC by dehydrochlorination reactions.
Materials 17 00173 g004
Figure 5. The formation of harmful chlorinated compounds (PCDDs, where m and n can range from 0 to 4) by the decomposition of PVC.
Figure 5. The formation of harmful chlorinated compounds (PCDDs, where m and n can range from 0 to 4) by the decomposition of PVC.
Materials 17 00173 g005
Table 1. Representative PCV plasticizers [32,33].
Table 1. Representative PCV plasticizers [32,33].
Materials 17 00173 i001Materials 17 00173 i002Materials 17 00173 i003Materials 17 00173 i004
Phthalates
DEHP (R = iC8)
DIDP (R = iC10)
DINP (R = iC9)
Adipates
(n = 4)
DINA (R = iC9)
DIDA (R = iC10)
Sebacates
(n = 8)
DBS (R = C4)
DOS (R = iC10)
Citrates
TEC (R = Et)
Phosphates
TCP (Ar = Tol)
Table 2. A summary of a water consumption and wastewater generated during the production of 1 kg of S-PVC ([80], modified).
Table 2. A summary of a water consumption and wastewater generated during the production of 1 kg of S-PVC ([80], modified).
St.Steps of PVC Production ProcessWI
[kg] a
WsWO
[kg] a
1Ethylene (E) and Chlorine (Cl2) Production
1.1.Materials 17 00173 i00500
1.2Materials 17 00173 i00600
2VCM production process1.030.63
Materials 17 00173 i007
3PVC production process2.241.83
Materials 17 00173 i008
1-3Total2.24; 3.272.46
EEthylene; EDCEthylene DiChloride; VCVinyl Chloride; PVCPoly(Vinyl Chloride); WI—Water Input; WsWO—Wastewater Output. In the oxy–chlorination process, ethylene reacts with a mixture of chlorine and oxygen. a Rounded to the second decimal place. 1.2 According to [81].
Table 3. The assessment of PVC pipes’ environmental impact. Adapted with permission from [83]. Copyright © 2023, Elsevier.
Table 3. The assessment of PVC pipes’ environmental impact. Adapted with permission from [83]. Copyright © 2023, Elsevier.
Impact CategoryUnitManufacturingUse and Waste DisposalTotal Impact
Global warmingg CO2 eq272,308.0223,031.1495,339.1
AcidificationH+ moles eq63,922.625,215.889,138.5
Human health-cancerg C6H6 eq44,720.6428.545,149.1
Human health-noncancerg C7H7 eq56,880,581.6627,435.757,508,017.3
Eutrophicationg N eq94.247.4141.7
Ecotoxicityg 2,4-D eq3304.5223.53528.0
Smogg NOx eq858.7214.21072.9
Habitat alterationT&E count1.55 × 10−134.65 × 10−136.2 × 10−13
Ozone depletiong CFC-11 eq0.00080.0040.00
Table 4. Representative occurrence of PVC in environmental waters, sediments, and organisms of marine animals.
Table 4. Representative occurrence of PVC in environmental waters, sediments, and organisms of marine animals.
Waters & Sediments
Water supplyChangsha (Hunan, https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunan, accessed on 4 October 2023), ChinaYin, 2019 [101],
Shen, 2021 [102]
NW Germany Mintenig, 2019 [103]
Surface fresh water Wei River, Yellow River's tributary, ChinaDing, 2019 [104]
Pearl River catchment, ChinaFan, 2019 [105],
Yan, 2019 [106]
Honghu Lake, China Xiong, 2021 [107]
Sediments & surface fresh waterWest Lakes, China Jiang, 2018; [108]
Wang, 2018 [109]
Surface and sub-surface seawaterKorean coastal regions Chae, 2015; [110]
Song, 2015 [111]
Marmara SeaTunçer, 2018 [112]
Kuantan of Malaysia Khalik, 2018 [113]
GreenlandMorgana, 2019 [114]
Arctic OceanLusher, 2015 [115]
NW PacificPan, 2019 [98]
Water column NW Mediterranean SeaLefebvre, 2019 [116]
Bohai Sea-Yellow SeaDai, 2018 [117]
Floating and bottom sediment microplasticsAdriatic SeaZeri, 2018; [118]
Palatinus, 2019 [119]
W. Mediterranean Seade Haan, 2019 [120]
Cilacap, Java (Indonesia)Syakti, 2017 [121]
Surface seawater and sediment Melbourne coastal metropolisSu, 2020 [122]
Suva coastal area of FijiFerreira, 2020 [123]
Bottom sedimentsArctic OceanKanhai, 2019 [124]
Norwegian fjords Gomiero, 2019 [125]
Venetian islandsVianello, 2013 [126]
Singapore coastline mangrove ecosystemsNor, 2014 [127]
Sand seashoreAtlantic seashore, Cape Town, South AfricaVilakati, 2020 [128]
Atlantic seashore, Punta del Este, Uruguay Lozoya, 2016 [129]
Marine Animals and Organisms
FishesSiganus fuscescensCoastal sediments, Negros, PhilippineBucol, 2020 [130]
Nephrops norvegicusCoasts of Ireland.Hara, 2020 [131]
SardinesNW Mediterranean SeaLefebvre, 2019 [116]
Triglops nybelini , Boreogadus saidaArctic OceanLusher, 2015 [115]
Various speciesAustralian marketsWootton, 2021 [132]
Suva coastal area, FijiFerreira, 2020 [123]
Markets in Fujian, ChinaFang, 2019 [133]
ShellfishesMytilus edulisMussel and oyster farming zone,
Pen-Bé, France
Phuong, 2018 [134]
Meretrix meretrixMarkets in Fujian & Xiamen, ChinaFang, 2019 [133]
Various speciesSal Estuary River, Goa, IndiaSaha, 2021 [135]
Table 5. Impact of PVC microplastics (PVC-MPs) on aquatic organisms.
Table 5. Impact of PVC microplastics (PVC-MPs) on aquatic organisms.
OrganismGenus/SpeciesPVC-MPs Conc. [Unit]Effect of PVC-MPs on the OrganismRefs.
AlgaeChlamydomonas reinhardtii10–200
[mg/L]
Growth inhibition; reduction in chlorophyll-A levelWang, 2020 [161].
Skeletonema costatum1–50
[mg/L]
Inhibition of growth; inhibition of photosynthesis efficiency via decrease in chlorophyll content; adsorption, aggregation, and toxic effects on algal cellsZhang, 2017s [163].
CoralsZoanthus sociatus10 mg/LIncrease in adhesion to coral epidermis; OS induction; changes in photosynthethic efficiencyRocha, 2020 [164].
PlantsUtricularia aurea50
[mg/L]
Growth, length, and biomass inhibition; negative effects on physiological parameters (chlorophyll content)Zhou, 2020 [165].
MusselsPerna viridis21.6–2160
[mg/L]
Decrease in clearance, respiration rates, and byssus production; decrease in median survival times with increasing pollution by PVCRist, 2016 [166].
Mytilus galloprovincialis-Accumulation in the organismGomiero, 2019 [167].
Arthro-podsDaphnia magna50 [mg/L]Induction of mortality; increase in immobilizationRenzi, 2019 [168].
FishClarias gariepinus0.50; 1.50; 3.0
[% of diet]
Reduction of mean cell volume/cell hemoglobin values; decrease in neutrophil counts; GPx alternation (brain, gill); SOD inhibition (brain, gill); CAD reduction (brain); increase in lipid peroxidation levels (brain); AChE inhibition (brain, gill); OS inductionIheanacho & Odo, 2020 [169].
Cyprinus carpio10–30
[% of diet]
Growth inhibition; alternation of the antioxidant activities—inverse relationship between SOD, CAT after exposition on PVC; increase in GPx activities; reduction in MDA levels; alternation of antioxidant-related gene expression in the livers of larvae; changes in transcription; vacuolation of cytoplasm in the liver under exposure over 20% additives of PVC to dietXia, 2020 [170].
Dicentrarchus labrax100; 500
[mg/kg diet]
Increase in the phagocytic and respiratory burst activities of head kidney leucocytes; decrease in immunity and OS inductionEspinosa, 2019 [171].
Dicentrarchus labrax0.1
[% of diet]
Histopathological changes in the ingestinePeda, 2016 [172].
Etroplus suratensis1.0–10.8
[mg/L]
Influence on SOD activity (increase at 1.03–1.8 mg/L; decrease at 3.0–10.8 mg/L); behavioral changes (fin flickering, burst swimming, and jerking movement); decrease in red and white blood cells; changes in antioxidant enzymesVijayaraghavan, 2022, [151].
Sparus aurata100; 500
[mg/kg diet]
Gene expression changes: PRDX5 (decrease); PRDX1, PRDX3 (increase); UCP1 (up-regulation).Espinosa, 2017 [173].
AchE—acetylcholinesterase; CAT—catalase; GPx—glutathione peroxidase; MDA—malondialdehyde; OS—oxidative stress; SOD—superoxide dismutase.
Table 6. Examples of methods for PVC and other plastics’ neutralization and disposal from the environment.
Table 6. Examples of methods for PVC and other plastics’ neutralization and disposal from the environment.
MethodTypeMechanismRefs.
chemical dechlorinationchemical neutralizationmodification consisting in replacing some chlorine atoms with various nucleophilic reagentsLu, 2019 [210]
hydrothermal dechlorinationphysico-chemical neutralizationconducting modifications in supercritical or subcritical water which works as a solvent and reagent for reactions of organic compoundsLi, 2017 [211]
photodegradationphysical degradationbreaking down the chemical bonds in a polymer by ultraviolet (UV) radiationYousif, 2015 [212]
mechanical recyclingmechanical modificationrecycling technique consisting in extruding and mixing the material with primary polymersSadat-Shojai, 2011
[213]
pyrolysisphysico-chemical degradationpolymer decomposition under high temperatureYu, 2016 [21]
biodegradationbiological degradationpolymer decomposition by microorganisms such as bacteria and filamentous fungi, and organisms such as insectsVivi et al. 2019 [214]
Giacomucci, 2019 [215]
Tsochatzis, 2021 [216]
biofragmentationbiological modificationthe breakdown of polymers into monomers, dimers, or oligomers during a lytic process, involving decrease in the molecular weight of the polymer and oxidation of the lower-weight molecules using specific enzymes (oxidoreductases and hydrolases), as well as free radicalsRestrepo-Flórez,
2014 [217]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kudzin, M.H.; Piwowarska, D.; Festinger, N.; Chruściel, J.J. Risks Associated with the Presence of Polyvinyl Chloride in the Environment and Methods for Its Disposal and Utilization. Materials 2024, 17, 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010173

AMA Style

Kudzin MH, Piwowarska D, Festinger N, Chruściel JJ. Risks Associated with the Presence of Polyvinyl Chloride in the Environment and Methods for Its Disposal and Utilization. Materials. 2024; 17(1):173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kudzin, Marcin H., Dominika Piwowarska, Natalia Festinger, and Jerzy J. Chruściel. 2024. "Risks Associated with the Presence of Polyvinyl Chloride in the Environment and Methods for Its Disposal and Utilization" Materials 17, no. 1: 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010173

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop