Next Article in Journal
Anti-Penetration Performance of Composite Structures with Metal-Packaged Ceramic Interlayer and UHMWPE Laminate
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of the Strengthening Effects of In Situ TiB Fibers in a Ti Composite with Various Levels of Thermal Processing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Valorisation of Water Potabilization Sludges as Precursors for Alkali-Activated Binders: Characterization and Feasibility Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influencing Factors of Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Ca-Rich Alkali-Activated Materials

Graduate School of Science and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Tokiwadai, Ube 755-8611, Yamaguchi, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(6), 2473; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062473
Submission received: 15 February 2023 / Revised: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 20 March 2023

Abstract

In this paper, we distinguished the degradation of alkali-activated material (AAM) exposed to sulfuric acid as physical (scaling, spalling, cracking, breaking, etc.) and chemical degradation (neutralization), because the mechanisms of these two types of degradation are different. Then, the effects of curing method, raw materials, and their mixing proportions on the two kinds of degradation of AAMs containing GGBFS were investigated in detail, including liquid-filler ratio, component of alkali activator, chemical admixture, inactive filler alternative to fly ash (FA), addition of municipal waste incineration bottom ash (BA), etc. The experimental results show that (a) small liquid-filler ratio, heat-curing, and the use of blended alkali activator solution of sodium silicate and NaOH can reduce both physical and chemical degradation of AAMs; (b) large GGBFS content or AE agent addition decreases the physical degradation, but increases the chemical degradation; (c) using crushed stone powder to replace FA and adding BA or a retarder would increase the physical and chemical degradation; but (d) the use of drying shrinkage reducer composed of polyether derivatives does not affect acid resistance. We also discussed the applicability and limitation of XRD and SEM-EDS in analyzing the chemical compositions of Ca-rich AAMs exposed to sulfuric acid, and found that (e) XRD analysis can identify the gypsum formation, and the gypsum peak intensity is related to the physical degradation of the Ca-rich AAMs; (f) by SEM-EDS analysis, the decalcification and dealkalization of C-A-S-H gels can be judged from the decrease in the average Ca/Si atomic ratio and the average Na atomic percentage in the acid corrosion area, but dealumination can be only determined from the dissimilarity of Al and Si elemental maps; and (g) if the CaO/SO3 molar ratio ranges from 0.8 to 1.0, gypsum formation can be estimated.
Keywords: alkali-activated material; acid resistance; chemical admixture; inactive precursor; waste incineration ash alkali-activated material; acid resistance; chemical admixture; inactive precursor; waste incineration ash

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Ikeda, K. Influencing Factors of Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Ca-Rich Alkali-Activated Materials. Materials 2023, 16, 2473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062473

AMA Style

Li Z, Ikeda K. Influencing Factors of Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Ca-Rich Alkali-Activated Materials. Materials. 2023; 16(6):2473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062473

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhuguo, and Ko Ikeda. 2023. "Influencing Factors of Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Ca-Rich Alkali-Activated Materials" Materials 16, no. 6: 2473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062473

APA Style

Li, Z., & Ikeda, K. (2023). Influencing Factors of Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Ca-Rich Alkali-Activated Materials. Materials, 16(6), 2473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062473

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop