Next Article in Journal
Naturally Derived Cements Learned from the Wisdom of Ancestors: A Literature Review Based on the Experiences of Ancient China, India and Rome
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Improvement of Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diodes Using a ZnMgO Electron Transport Layer with a Core/Shell Structure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Technological Aspects of Lithium-Titanium Ferrite Synthesis by Electron-Beam Heating

Problem Research Laboratory of Electronics of Dielectrics and Semiconductors, Research School of Physics, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenina Avenue 30, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(2), 604; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020604
Submission received: 9 December 2022 / Revised: 30 December 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 8 January 2023

Abstract

:
Solid-phase synthesis of lithium-titanium ferrite by electron-beam heating of a Fe2O3–Li2CO3–TiO2 initial reagents mixture with different history (powder, compact, mechanically activated mixture) was studied using X-ray diffraction, thermomagnetometric and specific saturation magnetization analyses. Ferrite was synthesized using an ILU-6 pulsed electron accelerator; it generated electrons with electron energy of 2.4 MeV to heat samples to temperatures of 600 and 750 °C. The isothermal holding time upon reaching the synthesis temperature was 0–120 min. The efficiency of ferrite synthesis by electron-beam heating was evaluated via comparison of the characteristics of the obtained samples with those synthesized by conventional ceramic technology under similar temperature-time conditions. It was found that the rate of ferrite formation depends on the heating method, temperature, synthesis time, density, and activity of the initial mixture. It was shown that sample compaction provides the preferential formation of unsubstituted lithium ferrite of Li0.5Fe2.5O4 composition with a Curie temperature of at ca. 630 °C in both synthesis methods. High-energy electron-beam heating of the mechanically activated mixture significantly accelerates synthesis of Li0.6Fe2.2Ti0.2O4 substituted ferrite, for which the Curie temperature and specific saturation magnetization were recorded as 534 °C and 50 emu/g, respectively. Therefore, LiTi ferrites can be obtained at a lower temperature (750 °C) and with a shorter synthesis time (120 min) compared to traditional ceramic technology.

1. Introduction

Ferrites hold a specific place among the many technological magnetic materials. Ferrite materials, including lithium-containing ferrites, are currently the key elements in most modern radio engineering, electronic, and computing devices [1,2,3,4]. Lithium and substituted lithium ferrites are characterized by a sufficiently low cost, yet they exhibit a certain combination of electrical and magnetic properties, which enable their use in microwave technology. They show high values of the Curie temperature and saturation magnetization, and low dielectric and magnetic losses required to design ferrite devices operating at microwave and millimeter wave frequencies [5,6,7,8].
Lithium-containing ferrites used in microwave technology are typically of a complex composition, which is attained by replacing iron ions, for example, with titanium, zinc, or manganese ions. The electrical properties of ferrites, in particular, can be improved via Ti4+ ions introduced into pure lithium ferrite Li0.5Fe2.5O4 to decrease the formation of Fe3+ ions during ferrite synthesis [9,10,11]. Therefore, the Li0.5(1+x)Fe2.5−1.5xTixO4 substituted lithium-titanium ferrite with a spinel structure and high electrical resistance is formed. Substitution with titanium ions increases the electrical resistance, yet the saturation magnetization decreases slightly. The Curie temperature also decreases depending on the concentration of introduced titanium ions.
Several methods have been developed for ferrite synthesis with regard to the field of their application. These include a widespread ceramic technology [12,13,14,15], sol-gel [16,17], co-precipitation method [18], etc. [19,20]. The above methods are aimed at synthesis of ferrites with specified, reproducible, and uniform electromagnetic properties.
The conventional ceramic technology, the key method for ferrite synthesis, employs solid-phase synthesis of ferrites from mixtures of initial oxides that include iron oxide Fe2O3 as the main component. To obtain ferrites of complex compositions, ceramic technology requires high synthesis temperatures and long high temperature exposures to synthesize ferrites with good properties [13,14].
It is known that the properties of ferrites synthesized by this method significantly depend on the redox processes occurring during heating and cooling. In this case, high temperatures stimulate reduction reactions associated with oxygen loss from the ferrite lattice [21]. Volatile elements, such as lithium, in ferrite chemical composition may complicate the processes. As reported in [21], lithium in combination with oxygen can be released from samples at 1000 °C. Therefore, in many cases, high temperatures used for synthesis of lithium-containing ferrites become critical due to the violation of their stoichiometric composition and, as a result, deterioration of the synthesized sample properties.
This problem can be partially solved by mechanical milling of the initial reagents in a ball mill [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Such treatment reduces the size of the powder particles and simultaneously increases imperfection of the powders, which enhances the reactive activity of the reagents. As shown in [22,32], grinding of the initial oxides, used for ferrite formation, in a planetary mill reduces the synthesis temperature by 100–200 °C, depending on ferrite composition. The time of mechanical activation of the powder typically ranges from 1 to 5 h, depending on the energy intensity of the treatment, which depends on the rotation speed of the mill cups, the diameter of the balls, etc.
A synthesis method was previously developed to reduce the temperature and time of ferrite synthesis; it employs heating of the initial reagents by an electron beam with energies above 1 MeV [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. High electron energies provide the possibility of volumetric heating of the synthesized samples, and the electron penetration depth depends on the density of the samples. The synthesis temperature can be controlled by changing the parameters of the electron beam, including the current density.
The electron-beam heating method was used to synthesize ferrites of various compositions, including spinel lithium, lithium-zinc and manganese-zinc ferrites, and hexagonal ferrites [35,38,39,40,41,42]. In [43,44,45], it was shown that this heating method increases the rate of solid-phase interaction between the initial reagents, which significantly decreases the ferrite synthesis temperature. The results reported in [43] showed that the initial reagents mainly interact during nonisothermal heating of the samples within a very short time. Formal kinetic analysis of lithium ferrite synthesis showed that ferrite formation under electron-beam heating is accelerated due to the decreased activation energy of synthesis and the decreased pre-exponential factor in the temperature dependence of the reaction rate.
To develop the electron beam technology for ferrite production, the efficiency of ferrite synthesis under these conditions should be increased, which depends on numerous parameters, including treatment modes and sample history. This study focused on solid-phase synthesis of lithium-titanium ferrite by electron-beam heating of samples of different density and activity.

2. Materials and Methods

We studied synthesis of ferrite with the chemical formula Li0.6Fe2.2Ti0.2O4, which was fabricated from the commercially initial reagents Li2CO3 (10.38 wt.%), Fe2O3 (82.14 wt.%), and TiO2 (7.48 wt.%) (powder purity 99%, Reahim Co., Moscow, Russia). The average particle sizes of Li2CO3, Fe2O3, and TiO2 powders were 47, 12, and 1 μm, respectively.
The mixture of Li2CO3–Fe2O3–TiO2 initial reagents was divided into several parts to obtain samples of different density and activity. Samples in the form of reagent powder showed a bulk density of 1.7 g/cm3. Samples in the form of pellets were compacted using a hydraulic press under pressure of 200 MPa; the pellet density was 2.8 g/cm3.
Some of the samples made from the initial powder mixture were mechanically activated in an AGO-2S planetary ball mill at a rotation speed of 1290 (MA1 samples) and 2220 (MA2 samples) rpm. For milling, steel cups and 6 mm balls were used. The ball-to-powder mass ratio was 10:1.
Ferrite synthesis was performed by two methods. The first method was a conventional ceramic technology; samples were synthesized by thermal heating (T-samples) in the laboratory furnace at 600 and 750 °C with an isothermal holding time of up to 120 min. The second method employed radiation-thermal heating of samples (RT-samples); synthesis was performed by high-energy electron-beam heating using an ILU-6 pulsed electron accelerator with electron energy of 2.4 MeV. The time of the nonisothermal heating stage varied from 3 to 5 min with respect to the synthesis temperature, which depended on the beam current density. More details about the RT method of sample treatment are reported in [45].
An ARL X’TRA X-ray diffractometer, the Powder Cell 2.5 software, and the PDF-4+ powder database were used for X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) of the samples. The specific saturation magnetization (σS) was measured using an H-04 induction magnetometer at a magnetizing field of 4.7 kOe. The Curie temperature (TC) of the samples was studied by the thermomagnetometric method based on thermogravimetric measurements with an applied external magnetic field. The temperature was analyzed using a Netzsch STA 449C Jupiter thermal analyzer and permanent magnets providing an external magnetic field of 5 Oe. The thermomagnetometry technique is described in more detail in [46].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis

Formation of lithium-titanium ferrite proceeds in accordance with Equation (1):
Li2CO3 + (5 − 3x)(x + 1)−1Fe2O3 + 4x(x + 1)−1TiO2→4(x + 1)−1Li0.5(1+x)Fe2.5−1.5xTixO4 + CO2
During synthesis, at x = 0.2, soft magnetic spinel ferrite of the Li0.6Fe2.2Ti0.2O4 composition, is formed. In [44], it was shown that lithium-titanium ferrite synthesis can yield lithium ferrite in accordance with the reaction:
Li2CO3 + 5Fe2O3 → 4Li0.5Fe2.5O4 + CO2
and substituted spinel phases of lithium-titanium ferrite with x ≠ 0.2. These spinel phases are typically transition products of the reaction; their concentration depends on the temperature-time treatment conditions. At a sufficiently high synthesis temperature and long isothermal exposure, the transition products interact with each other to form Li0.6Fe2.2Ti0.2O4 ferrite.
In [44], it was shown that the lattice parameters of the Li0.5Fe2.5O4 and Li0.5(1+x)Fe2.5−1.5xTixO4 ferrite phases are similar, which causes the merge of the reflections in the diffraction patterns. Therefore, the total content of spinel ferrite phases formed during ferrite synthesis was analyzed by the XRD method.
The XRD patterns were obtained for all the studied samples. The paper reports data for samples synthesized for 120 min. Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of samples synthesized from powdered and compacted mixtures of initial reagents. The analysis showed that after synthesis the samples contained not only spinel phases, which may belong to lithium and titanium-substituted lithium ferrites, but also phases of unreacted initial components, mainly Fe2O3 (marked reflections), which quantitative content depends on synthesis conditions. Consequently, the amount of the synthesized spinel ferrite phase grows, and the amount of powder starting reagents decreases at increased temperature and isothermal holding time in both synthesis methods.
Table 1 and Table 2 present XRD and other data for the spinel phase synthesized within 120 min in different samples. The lattice parameter for this phase synthesized in powdered and compacted samples is about 8.33 Ǻ. Lithium ferrite of the Li0.5Fe2.5O4 composition [47] exhibits this value of the lattice parameter. It is known that at increased titanium content in the spinel phase, the lattice parameter increases and amounts to 8.335 Ǻ for Li0.6Fe2.2Ti0.2O4 ferrite [47]. Therefore, the values obtained for the lattice parameter of the spinel phase in mechanically activated samples most likely evidence the formation of titanium-substituted lithium ferrites.
It was found that the concentration of the spinel phase of ferrite was higher in compacted samples compared to the powder synthesized under similar temperature-time regime by both heating methods. This phenomenon was interpreted in our study [32], which shows that the decomposition of lithium carbonate and its interaction with iron oxide can be accelerated at an increased compact density of mixtures of Fe2O3—Li2CO3 powder reagents. This accelerates the synthesis process as a whole and intensifies the formation of the ferrite phase. A similar effect can be observed in a synthesis of ferrite from mechanically activated powder, only with a much greater efficiency due to a smaller particle size, high inter-particle contact density, and additional imperfection induced by powder activation.
The analysis also showed that electron-beam heating significantly accelerates the formation of spinel phases in comparison with thermal heating. At a synthesis temperature of 600 °C, the samples contain a large proportion of initial reagents in addition to the formed spinel lithium-titanium ferrite phases. However, the concentration of the initial reagents in the PT samples is significantly lower than that in the samples synthesized by thermal heating. As temperature increased up to 750 °C, formation of lithium-titanium ferrite phases accelerates. As a result, the diffraction patterns for samples synthesized from compacted reagents at 750 °C for 120 min show the content of only the spinel ferrite phase.
Figure 2 shows the diffraction patterns of samples synthesized from mechanically activated reagents at 600 °C for 120 min. All diffraction patterns show reflections from the spinel phase and from the initial Fe2O3 reagent. At increased rotation speed during powder milling, the amount of the synthesized spinel phase increases with both types of heating, yet a large amount of unreacted iron oxide remains. A similar pattern was observed for all synthesis times.
As shown in Figure 3, as synthesis temperature increased to 750 °C, the amount of ferrite formed significantly increases. In this case, samples synthesized for 10 min or longer contain only the spinel phase with both types of heating. At first sight, a similar type of the XRD indicates the similarity in the phase composition of these samples. As will be shown below, in reality it was different. Table 3 and Table 4 present XRD and other data for the spinel phase synthesized for 120 min from mechanically activated reagents using different rotation speeds of cups.
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show XRD patterns of the dependences of the spinel phase concentration in the synthesized samples at the synthesis time. Under thermal heating, at a synthesis temperature of 600 °C, the content of the spinel ferrite phase in the samples slowly increased with increased synthesis time. In this case, the concentration curves are linear. In all other modes, the concentration curves indicate the region of rapid accumulation of the spinel phase; its time interval depends on the treatment mode and the type of sample preparation; further it showed a slow increase in concentration over time.
Under electron-beam heating of compacted samples at 750 °C, the area of fast accumulation of the spinel phase in the concentration curves was partially shifted to the nonisothermal heating stage; for the given synthesis temperature, it was about 5 min. This effect is more pronounced in mechanically activated samples heated at 750 °C. In the latter case, a large amount of the spinel phase formed at the heating stage could be observed in the samples synthesized using both types of heating.
The behavior of the curves for the ferrite phase formation allows the assumption that synthesis involves diffusion interaction between the initial reagents, which initiates the formation of transition phases. Then the transition phases and phases of the initial reagents interact with each other to form lithium-substituted ferrite phases, namely, lithium-titanium ferrite phases. This assumption was confirmed by the previously obtained results, which show the dynamics of changes in the formation of intermediate reaction products during synthesis of substituted lithium ferrites [43].
The results obtained in [43] showed that the synthesis of substituted lithium ferrites at the initial heating stage causes formation of unsubstituted lithium ferrite of the Li0.5Fe2.5O4 composition. Therefore, the concentration dependences obtained in this study for lithium-titanium ferrite are like those obtained for lithium ferrite in [43]. Considering that during heating of the Fe2O3/Li2CO3 mixture by a high-energy electron beam, the initial rate of lithium ferrite formation sharply increases, the initial stage of the RT synthesis of lithium-titanium ferrite involves the formation of unsubstituted lithium ferrite phases. It is also known [10] that stable spinel compounds, such as Li2TiO3, Li4Ti5O12, Li4Ti5O12 and Li4Ti5O12, can be formed during lithium-titanium ferrite synthesis [10]. Apparently, during synthesis of lithium-titanium ferrites from Fe2O3/Li2CO3/TiO2 powder reagents, similar lithium-titanium oxide compounds are also formed in parallel with lithium ferrite at the initial stages of lithium-titanium ferrite formation. At later synthesis stages, lithium-titanium ferrite is formed due to the interaction between the initially formed phases.

3.2. Study of Specific Saturation Magnetization

Figure 6 and Figure 7 present the specific saturation magnetization of the samples versus their synthesis time. The value of σS for all the samples was observed to grow at increased synthesis time due to the increased magnetic phase. The behavior of the σS curves was generally like that of the above concentration curves. At a short synthesis time, the σS value sharply increased; at a synthesis time exceeding 30 min, the sample magnetization varied insignificantly.
The specific saturation magnetization of lithium-titanium ferrite is known to be lower than that of lithium ferrite. Therefore, the fluctuations in the behavior of the kinetic curves are related to competing processes in the formation of both unsubstituted lithium ferrite and substituted lithium-titanium ferrites.
Comparison of the curves revealed a higher degree of magnetization in the samples synthesized from mechanically activated reagents as compared to those obtained from powder or compacted samples. In addition, at increased grinding energy intensity, the content of the magnetic phase in the samples grew. In this case, the samples mechanically activated at 2220 rpm and synthesized by electron-beam heating show a high magnetization value of 50 emu/g, which is like the data reported in [24,45]. This is related to the decreased particle size and increased inter-particle contact area caused by mechanical treatment, which increases the rate of ferrite formation.

3.3. Thermomagnetometric Analysis of Samples

A thermomagnetometric (TM) analysis was performed to estimate the Curie temperature of the synthesized samples. As reported in [47], the XRD and TM data can be used to estimate the complete phase composition of ferrites more accurately.
Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the results of the TM analysis, including thermogravimetric (TG) data in the external magnetic field, derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) data, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data for the samples synthesized for 120 min. The TG and DSC measurements were performed simultaneously at a high heating rate of 50 K/min.
For the powder sample synthesized at 600 °C by thermal heating (Figure 8, T_600_powder sample), the decreased weight in the TG curve and DSC peak at 727 °C is caused by the CO2 release due to the synthesis reaction between the residues of the Fe2O3/Li2CO3/TiO2 initial reagents according to Equation (1). The calculated weight loss corresponding to the complete reaction equals 6.17% with an enthalpy of 100 J/g [48]. Therefore, the obtained value of 2.54% with an enthalpy of 56 J/g in the TG curve corresponds to approximately 41% completion of the reaction. For the compact sample (Figure 8, T_600_compact), the observed reaction was associated with the presence of initial reagents that did not react during synthesis, but were less numerous. In this case, the peak observed in the DSC curve at 753 °C is due to the “order-disorder” phase transition in the synthesized lithium ferrite α-Li0.5Fe2.5O4. According to [22], the enthalpy of a complete transition is 12 J/g. Therefore, the concentration of the synthesized unsubstituted lithium ferrite estimated from the DSC peak is 21.6 wt.%, which is similar to the spinel phase concentration of 20 wt% according to the XRD analysis of this sample. The presence of Li0.5Fe2.5O4 in this sample is evidenced by the Curie temperature, which corresponds to the magnetic phase transition and equals 629 °C. At this temperature, the TG curve shows a weight jump caused by termination of the sample interaction with the external magnetic field. The obtained value of the Curie point is similar to that reported in [22,49].
Figure 8 shows that the height of the weight jump in the magnetic phase transition and the peak area of the DSC α→β transition in the Li0.5Fe2.5O4 phase, which characterize the concentration content of lithium ferrite, depend on the synthesis temperature, heating method, and sample activity. When the temperature of thermal synthesis was increased to 750 °C, the content of lithium ferrite increases, whereas the increased RT synthesis temperature reduces the content of the Li0.5Fe2.5O4 phase in the samples.
The samples preliminarily mechanically activated and then synthesized do not contain unsubstituted lithium ferrite (Figure 9). The Curie temperature depends on the rotation speed of mechanical grinding. Variation in the Curie temperature corresponds to the formation of lithium-titanium ferrites with different titanium substitutions [47]. Thus, the formation of lithium-titanium ferrite is more intensive during synthesis of samples from mechanically activated powders. In this case, samples mechanically activated at 2220 rpm and synthesized by electron-beam heating show a Curie temperature of 534 °C, which is like that for the TC of Li0.6Fe2.2Ti0.2O4 ferrite [47].
Apparently, mechanical grinding of the mixture of different powders not only decreases the particle size, but also significantly increases the number of triple contacts Li2CO3—Fe2O3—TiO2, which stimulates a rapid formation of substituted lithium-titanium ferrites.
Electron-beam heating of the studied material yields many free electrons, which can briefly reduce the charge of cations (Fe3+ и Ti4+). The change in the charge of cations decreases the energy of their electrostatic interaction with surrounding anions, thereby increasing their mobility. Consequently, an accelerated fusion reaction under RT heating can occur only if the initial stage of solid-phase interaction is limited by the diffusion of multiply charged Fe3+ and Ti4+ cations. In addition, local overheating of interfaces can occur due to nonradiative recombination of radiation-generated electronic excitations at the interfaces. In mechanically activated powders, the density of inter-particle contacts increases, which leads to local temperature gradients during RT treatment and changes the diffusion activity of particles.
The increased time of electron-beam heating minimizes the contribution of the radiation component to the diffusion driving force. This is due to the slower interaction of transition phases and subsequent formation of single-phase lithium-titanium ferrite.
Based on the obtained results, technological regimes were developed for efficient synthesis of lithium-titanium ferrites. Figure 10 presents the scheme that includes the mechanical activation of mixtures of ferrite reagents Li2CO3—Fe2O3—TiO2 and their subsequent heating by a pulsed electron beam.

4. Conclusions

The XRD and TM analyses were employed to study the solid-phase synthesis of lithium-titanium ferrite with the chemical composition of Li0.6Fe2.2Ti0.2O4 under electron-beam heating of a mixture of Fe2O3—Li2CO3—TiO2 initial reagents at 600 and 750 °C, and to analyze the specific saturation magnetization. The initial reagents were used in the form of a powder, a compact, and a powder mechanically activated at different speeds. The parameters of the samples synthesized by electron-beam heating were compared with those prepared using the conventional ceramic technology.
It was shown that the rate of lithium-titanium ferrite synthesis depends on the history of powder reagents, type of heating, and temperature and time of synthesis. Increased temperature and time of synthesis increased the concentration of the spinel ferrite phase in the samples, which is typical of ferrite synthesis. The compaction of samples increased the rate of ferrite synthesis, but the temperature-time regimes used caused the synthesis of unsubstituted lithium ferrite of Li0.5Fe2.5O4, which is a transition product of the reaction during synthesis of substituted lithium ferrites. The formation of lithium ferrite was confirmed by the registered Curie temperature, equal to 631–634 °C depending on the heating method.
Preliminary mechanical activation of the Fe2O3—Li2CO3—TiO2 initial powder reagents significantly accelerated ferrite formation under both types of heating. When the energy intensity of grinding that depends on the cup rotation speed (1290 and 2220 rpm) grew, the concentration of the synthesized spinel phase increased, which is associated with the formation of lithium substituted phases of variable composition.
Under electron-beam heating mixtures of initial reagents, the rate of lithium-titanium ferrite formation was much higher than that during conventional thermal synthesis. This was evidenced by a faster transformation of the initial reagents into spinel ferrite phases in the entire temperature range. In this case, the samples mechanically activated at a high rotation speed of 2220 rpm and synthesized by electron-beam heating at 750 °C were characterized by a single-phase ferrite composition of Li0.6Fe2.2Ti0.2O4, which was confirmed by data on the Curie temperature (534 °C) and specific saturation magnetization (50 emu/g).
The paper proposes a technological scheme for efficient synthesis of substituted lithium-titanium ferrites at a lower temperature (750 °C) and a shorter synthesis time (120 min) compared to traditional ceramic technology, which requires the use of high synthesis temperature of about 1000 °C and long synthesis time over 10 h.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.L.; methodology, V.V. and E.N.; software, V.V. and E.N.; formal analysis, E.L. and S.G.; investigation, V.V. and E.N.; data curation, E.L. and S.G.; writing—original draft preparation, E.L.; writing—review and editing, A.S.; supervision, A.S.; project administration, A.S.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant No. 22-19-00183.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to M.V. Korobeynikov (Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk) for radiation-thermal experiments performed using ILU accelerator.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Breton, J.M. Ferrite magnets: Properties and applications. Ref. Mod. Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng. 2021, 3, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mattei, J.L.; Chevalier, A.; Laur, V. Ferrite Ceramics at Microwave Frequencies: Applications and Characterization. Ref. Mod. Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng. 2021, 3, 183–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, H.; Ji, P.; Han, X. Rheological phase synthesis of nanosized α-LiFeO2 with higher crystallinity degree for cathode material of lithium-ion batteries. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 183, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rezlescu, N.; Doroftei, C.; Rezlescu, E.; Popa, P.D. Lithium ferrite for gas sensing applications. Sens. Actuat. B 2008, 133, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sharif, M.; Jacob, J.; Javed, M.; Manzoor, A.; Mahmood, K.; Khan, M.A. Impact of Co and Mn substitution on structural and dielectric properties of lithium soft ferrites. Phys. B 2019, 567, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.; Gao, L.; Li, L. Low temperature synthesis of metastable lithium ferrite: Magnetic and electrochemical properties. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 2677–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. White, G.O.; Patton, C.E. Magnetic properties of lithium ferrite microwave materials. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1978, 9, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ridgley, D.H.; Lessoff, H.; Childress, J.D. Effects of lithium and oxygen losses on magnetic and crystallographic properties of spinel lithium ferrite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1970, 53, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Shi, R.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X. Electromagnetic and microwave absorption properties of Ti doped Li-Zn ferrites. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 805, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manjula, R.; Murthy, V.R.K.; Sobhanadri, J. Electrical conductivity and thermoelectric power measurements of some lithium-titanium ferrites. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 59, 2929–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Wu, C.; Zhang, H. Study of the microstructure and microwave magnetic characteristics of Ti-doped Li-Zn ferrite. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 5430–5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ali, M.A.; Khan, M.N.I.; Chowdhury, F.-U.-Z.; Hossain, M.M.; Hoque, S.M.; Uddin, M.M. Impact of Sn4+ substitution in Mg–Zn ferrites: Deciphering the structural, morphological, dielectric, electrical and magnetic properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 263, 124357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hreščak, J.; Malič, B.; Cilenšek, J.; Benčan, A. Solid-state synthesis of undoped and Sr-doped K0.5Na0.5NbO3. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 127, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sharma, P.; Diwan, P.K.; Pandey, O.P. Impact of environment on the kinetics involved in the solid-state synthesis of bismuth ferrite. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 233, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rathod, V.; Anupama, A.V.; Vijaya Kumar, R.; Jali, V.M.; Sahoo, B. Correlated vibrations of the tetrahedral and octahedral complexes and splitting of the absorption bands in FTIR spectra of Li-Zn ferrites. Vib. Spectrosc. 2017, 92, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rathod, V.; Anupama, A.V.; Jali, V.M.; Hiremath, V.A.; Sahoo, B. Combustion synthesis, structure and magnetic properties of Li-Zn ferrite ceramic powders. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 14431–14440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kotsikau, D.; Ivanovskaya, M.; Pankov, V.; Fedotova, Y. Structure and magnetic properties of manganese-zinc-ferrite prepared by spray pyrolysis method. Solid State Sci. 2015, 39, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berezhnaya, M.V.; Mittova, I.Y.; Perov, N.S.; Al’myasheva, O.V.; Nguyen, A.T.; Mittova, V.O.; Bessalova, V.V.; Viryutina, E.L. Production of zinc-doped yttrium ferrite nanopowders by the sol-gel method. Russ. J. Inorgan. Chem. 2018, 63, 742–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saikia, P.; Blaise Allou, N.; Borah, A.; Goswamee, R.L. Iso-conversional kinetics study on thermal degradation of Ni-Al layered double hydroxide synthesized by ‘soft chemical’ sol-gel method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 186, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, A.; Yadav, N.; Rana, D.S.; Kumar, P.; Arora, M.; Pant, R.P. Structural and magnetic studies of the nickel doped CoFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by the chemical co-precipitation method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 394, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Surzhikov, A.P.; Frangulyan, T.S.; Ghyngazov, S.A.; Lysenko, E.N. Investigation of structural states and oxidation processes in Li0.5Fe2.5O4−δ using TG analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 108, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Berbenni, V.; Marini, A.; Matteazzi, P.; Ricceri, R.; Welham, N.J. Solid-state formation of lithium ferrites from mechanically activated Li2CO3–Fe2O3 mixtures. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 23, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Widatallah, H.M.; Johnson, C.; Berry, F.J. The influence of ball milling and subsequent calcination on the formation of LiFeO2. J. Mater. Sci. 2002, 37, 4621–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Widatallah, H.M.; Ren, X.-L.; Al-Omari, I.A. The influence of TiO2 polymorph, mechanical milling and subsequent sintering on the formation of Ti-substituted spinel-related Li0.5Fe2.5O4. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 6333–6338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mazen, S.A.; Abu-Elsaad, N.I. Dielectric properties and impedance analysis of polycrystalline Li-Si ferrite prepared by high energy ball milling technique. J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 2017, 442, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. González-Angeles, A.; Lipka, J.; Grusková, A.; Jančárik, V.; Tóth, I.; Sláma, J. (Ni, Zn, Sn) Ru and (Ni, Sn) Sn substituted barium ferrite prepared by mechanical alloying. Hyperfine Interact. 2008, 184, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arab, A.; Mardaneh, M.R.; Yousefi, M.H. Investigation of magnetic properties of MnZn-substituted strontium ferrite nanopowders prepared via conventional ceramic technique followed by a high energy ball milling. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 374, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, D.; Harward, I.; Baptist, J.; Goldman, S.; Celinski, Z. Curie temperature and magnetic properties of aluminum doped barium ferrite particles prepared by ball mill method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 395, 350–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Šepelák, V.; Wibmann, S.; Becker, K.D. Magnetism of nanostructured mechanically activated and mechanosynthesized spinel ferrites. J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 1999, 203, 135–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vasoya, N.H.; Vanpariya, L.H.; Sakariya, P.N.; Timbadiya, M.D.; Pathak, T.K.; Lakhani, V.K.; Modi, K.B. Synthesis of nanostructured material by mechanical milling and study on structural property modifications in Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4. Ceram. Int. 2010, 36, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hajalilou, A.; Hashim, M.; Taghi Masoudi, M. A comparative study of in-situ mechanochemically synthesized Mn0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles in the MnO/ZnO/Fe2O3 and MnO2/Zn/Fe2O3 systems. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 8070–8079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lysenko, E.N.; Nikolaev, E.V.; Surzhikov, A.P.; Nikolaeva, S.A.; Plotnikova, I.V. The influence of reagents ball milling on the lithium ferrite formation. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 138, 2005–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Auslender, V.L.; Bochkarev, I.G.; Boldyrev, V.V.; Lyakhov, N.Z.; Voronin, A.P. Electron beam induced diffusion controlled reaction in solids. Sol. St. Ion. 1997, 101–103, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Neronov, V.A.; Voronin, A.P.; Tatarintseva, M.I.; Melekhova, T.E.; Auslender, V.L. Sintering under a high-power electron beam. J. Less-Common Met. 1986, 117, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ancharova, U.V.; Mikhailenko, M.A.; Tolochko, B.P.; Lyakhov, N.Z.; Korobeinikov, M.V.; Bryazgin, A.A.; Bezuglov, V.V.; Shtarklev, E.A. Synthesis and Staging of the Phase Formation for Strontium Ferrites in Thermal and Radiation Thermal Reactions. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 81, 012122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Boldyrev, V.V.; Voronin, A.P.; Gribkov, O.S.; Tkachenko, E.V.; Karagedov, G.R.; Yakobson, B.I.; Auslender, V.L. Radiation-thermal synthesis. Current achievement and outlook. Solid State Ion. 1989, 36, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lyakhov, N.Z.; Boldyrev, V.V.; Voronin, A.P.; Gribkov, O.S.; Bochkarev, I.G.; Rusakov, S.V.; Auslender, V.L. Electron beam stimulated chemical reaction in solids. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 1995, 43, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhuravlev, V.A.; Naiden, E.P.; Minin, R.V.; Itin, V.I.; Suslyaev, V.I.; Korovin, E.Y. Radiation-thermal synthesis of W-type hexaferrites. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 81, 012003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Naiden, E.P.; Zhuravlev, V.A.; Minin, R.V.; Suslyaev, V.I.; Itin, V.I.; Korovin, E.Y. Structural and magnetic properties of SHS-produced multiphase W-type hexaferrites: Influence of radiation-thermal treatment. Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 2015, 24, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kostishin, V.G.; Andreev, V.G.; Korovushkin, V.V.; Chitanov, D.N.; Yudanov, N.A.; Morchenko, A.T.; Komlev, A.S.; Adamtsov, A.Y.; Nikolaev, A.N. Preparation of 2000NN ferrite ceramics by a complete and a short radiation-enhanced thermal sintering process. Inorg. Mat. 2014, 50, 1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kostishyn, V.; Isaev, I.; Scherbakov, S.; Nalogin, A.; Belokon, E.; Bryazgin, A. Obtaining anisotropic hexaferrites for the base layers of microstrip SHF devices by the radiation-thermal sintering. East.-Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. 2016, 5, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kounsalye, J.S.; Kharat, P.B.; Bhoyar, D.N.; Jadhav, K.M. Radiation-induced modification in structural, electrical and dielectric properties of Ti4+ ions substituted Li0.5Fe2.5O4 nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 8601–8609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lysenko, E.N.; Vlasov, V.A.; Surzhikov, A.P. Investigation of kinetics of lithium ferrite formation under electron beam treatment. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. B 2020, 466, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Surzhikov, A.P.; Lysenko, E.N.; Vlasov, V.A.; Malyshev, A.V.; Vasendina, E.A. Magnetization study in solid state formation of lithium-titanium ferrites synthesized by electron beam heating. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 176, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lysenko, E.N.; Nikolaev, E.V.; Vlasov, V.A.; Surzhikov, A.P. Technological scheme for lithium-substituted ferrite production under complex high-energy impact. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. B 2020, 474, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lysenko, E.N.; Nikolaev, E.V.; Vlasov, V.A.; Surzhikov, A.P. Microstructure and reactivity of Fe2O3-Li2CO3-ZnO ferrite system ball-milled in a planetary mill. Thermochim. Acta 2018, 664, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lysenko, E.N.; Astafyev, A.L.; Vlasov, V.A.; Surzhikov, A.P. Analysis of phase composition of LiZn and LiTi ferrites by XRD and thermomagnetometric analysis. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 465, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ahniyaz, A.; Fujiwara, T.; Song, S.-W.; Yoshimura, M. Low temperature preparation of β-LiFe5O8 fine particles by hydrothermal ball milling. J. Solid State Ion. 2002, 151, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. An, S.Y.; Shim, I.-B.; Kim, C.S. Synthesis and magnetic properties of LiFe5O8 powders by a sol-gel process. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 290, 1551–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C by T and RT heating of powdered and compacted Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture. *—Fe2O3, ^—Li2CO3, X—TiO2.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C by T and RT heating of powdered and compacted Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture. *—Fe2O3, ^—Li2CO3, X—TiO2.
Materials 16 00604 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of LiTi ferrite synthesized by T (a) and RT (b) heating at 600 °C for 120 min from Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture mechanically activated at different energy intensity. *—Fe2O3.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of LiTi ferrite synthesized by T (a) and RT (b) heating at 600 °C for 120 min from Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture mechanically activated at different energy intensity. *—Fe2O3.
Materials 16 00604 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of LiTi ferrite synthesized by T (a,c) and RT (b,d) heating at 600 (a,b) and 750 (c,d) °C for different isothermal holding times. *—Fe2O3, ^—Li2CO3, X—TiO2.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of LiTi ferrite synthesized by T (a,c) and RT (b,d) heating at 600 (a,b) and 750 (c,d) °C for different isothermal holding times. *—Fe2O3, ^—Li2CO3, X—TiO2.
Materials 16 00604 g003
Figure 4. Concentration of spinel phases in LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C: solid lines—compacted samples; dotted line—powdered samples.
Figure 4. Concentration of spinel phases in LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C: solid lines—compacted samples; dotted line—powdered samples.
Materials 16 00604 g004
Figure 5. Concentration of spinel phases in LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C from mechanically activated Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 reagents mixture: solid lines—activation at 2220 rpm; dotted line—activation at 1290 rpm.
Figure 5. Concentration of spinel phases in LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C from mechanically activated Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 reagents mixture: solid lines—activation at 2220 rpm; dotted line—activation at 1290 rpm.
Materials 16 00604 g005
Figure 6. Specific saturation magnetization of LiTi ferrite as a function of synthesis time: solid lines—compacted samples; dotted line—powdered samples. Synthesis is at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C.
Figure 6. Specific saturation magnetization of LiTi ferrite as a function of synthesis time: solid lines—compacted samples; dotted line—powdered samples. Synthesis is at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C.
Materials 16 00604 g006
Figure 7. Specific saturation magnetization of LiTi ferrite as a function of synthesis time: solid lines—reagents activation at 2220 rpm; dotted line—reagents activation at 1290 rpm. Synthesis is at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C.
Figure 7. Specific saturation magnetization of LiTi ferrite as a function of synthesis time: solid lines—reagents activation at 2220 rpm; dotted line—reagents activation at 1290 rpm. Synthesis is at 600 (a) and 750 (b) °C.
Materials 16 00604 g007
Figure 8. TG/DSC analysis of LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 and 750 °C from powdered and compacted Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 reagents mixture. (a,b)—powdered samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (c,d)—compacted samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (e,f)—powdered samples synthesized at 750 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (g,h)—compacted samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively.
Figure 8. TG/DSC analysis of LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 and 750 °C from powdered and compacted Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 reagents mixture. (a,b)—powdered samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (c,d)—compacted samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (e,f)—powdered samples synthesized at 750 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (g,h)—compacted samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively.
Materials 16 00604 g008
Figure 9. TG/DSC analysis of LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 and 750 °C for 120 min from Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture mechanically activated at different energy intensity. (a,b)—mechanically activated at rotation speed of 1290 rpm samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (c,d)—mechanically activated at rotation speed of 1290 rpm samples synthesized at 750 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (e,f)—mechanically activated at rotation speed of 2220 rpm samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (g,h)—mechanically activated at rotation speed of 2220 rpm samples synthesized at 750 °C by T and RT heating respectively.
Figure 9. TG/DSC analysis of LiTi ferrite synthesized at 600 and 750 °C for 120 min from Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture mechanically activated at different energy intensity. (a,b)—mechanically activated at rotation speed of 1290 rpm samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (c,d)—mechanically activated at rotation speed of 1290 rpm samples synthesized at 750 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (e,f)—mechanically activated at rotation speed of 2220 rpm samples synthesized at 600 °C by T and RT heating respectively; (g,h)—mechanically activated at rotation speed of 2220 rpm samples synthesized at 750 °C by T and RT heating respectively.
Materials 16 00604 g009
Figure 10. Technological scheme of lithium-titanium ferrite synthesis.
Figure 10. Technological scheme of lithium-titanium ferrite synthesis.
Materials 16 00604 g010
Table 1. Structural and magnetic properties of LiTi ferrite synthesized from powdered and compacted Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture.
Table 1. Structural and magnetic properties of LiTi ferrite synthesized from powdered and compacted Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture.
SampleCspinel
(wt.%)
Lattice Parameter (Ǻ)Crystallite Size (nm)Microstrain
Δd/d·103
Tc (°C)σS
(emu/g)
T_600_120 powder11.58.325530.6-1.3
T_600_120 compact20.08.330770.66296.6
RT_600_120 powder28.48.327700.462914.9
RT_600_120 compact 49.88.329880.763224.0
Table 2. Structural and magnetic properties of LiTi ferrite synthesized from powdered and compacted Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture.
Table 2. Structural and magnetic properties of LiTi ferrite synthesized from powdered and compacted Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture.
SampleCspinel
(wt.%)
Lattice Parameter (Ǻ)Crystallite Size (nm)Microstrain Δd/d·103Tc (°C)σS
(emu/g)
T_750_120 powder59.08.3271200.562827.9
T_750_120 compact83.08.3311301.163142.0
RT_750_120 powder77.08.3301410.363037.6
RT_750_120 compact1008.3341271.163451.5
Table 3. Structural and magnetic properties of LiTi ferrite synthesized from mechanically activated Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture.
Table 3. Structural and magnetic properties of LiTi ferrite synthesized from mechanically activated Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture.
SampleCspinel
(wt.%)
Lattice Parameter (Ǻ)Crystallite Size (nm)Microstrain Δd/d·103Tc (°C)σS
(emu/g)
MA1_T_60018.98.321451.0-8.1
MA1_T_75098.08.337840.858134.0
MA1_RT_60054.58.328880.961827.0
MA1_RT_7501008.3381420.653949.7
Table 4. Structural and magnetic properties of LiTi ferrite synthesized from mechanically activated Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture.
Table 4. Structural and magnetic properties of LiTi ferrite synthesized from mechanically activated Li2CO3/Fe2O3/TiO2 mixture.
SampleCspinel
(wt.%)
Lattice Parameter (Ǻ)Crystallite Size (nm)Microstrain Δd/d·103Tc (°C)σS
(emu/g)
MA2_T_60037.18.322421.059318.3
MA2_T_75099.08.335800.655538.5
MA2_RT_60078.98.333630.460532.1
MA2_RT_7501008.337490.853451.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lysenko, E.; Vlasov, V.; Nikolaev, E.; Surzhikov, A.; Ghyngazov, S. Technological Aspects of Lithium-Titanium Ferrite Synthesis by Electron-Beam Heating. Materials 2023, 16, 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020604

AMA Style

Lysenko E, Vlasov V, Nikolaev E, Surzhikov A, Ghyngazov S. Technological Aspects of Lithium-Titanium Ferrite Synthesis by Electron-Beam Heating. Materials. 2023; 16(2):604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lysenko, Elena, Vitaly Vlasov, Evgeniy Nikolaev, Anatoliy Surzhikov, and Sergei Ghyngazov. 2023. "Technological Aspects of Lithium-Titanium Ferrite Synthesis by Electron-Beam Heating" Materials 16, no. 2: 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020604

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop