Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Components with Topology Optimization for Direct Additive Manufacturing by DLMS
Next Article in Special Issue
Hierarchical SAPO-34 Catalysts as Host for Cu Active Sites
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Diverse Parameters on the Physicochemical Characteristics of Green-Synthesized Zinc Oxide–Copper Oxide Nanocomposites Derived from an Aqueous Extract of Garcinia mangostana L. Leaf
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Zeolite NaY Dispersed on Bamboo Wood
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 15
10.3390/ma16155416
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Enhancement of Hydrogen Adsorption on Spray-Synthesized HKUST-1 via Lithium Doping and Defect Creation

by
Masaru Kubo
*,
Tomoki Matsumoto
and
Manabu Shimada
Department of Advanced Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Kagamiyama 1-4-1, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527, Hiroshima, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(15), 5416; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155416
Submission received: 6 July 2023 / Revised: 24 July 2023 / Accepted: 1 August 2023 / Published: 2 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis, Modification and Utilization of Porous Materials as Adsorbents, Catalysts and Catalyst Supports)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We prepared HKUST-1 (Cu3BTC2; BTC3− = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate) using a spray synthesis method with Li doping and defect created via partial replacement of H3BTC with isophthalic acid (IP) to enhance the H2 adsorption capacity. Li-doping was performed by incorporating LiNO3 in HKUST-1 via spray synthesis and subsequent thermal treatment for decomposing NO3−, which enhances H2 uptake at 77 K and 1 bar per unit mass and per unit area from 2.37 wt% and 4.16 molecules/nm2 for undoped HKUST-1 to 2.47 wt% and 4.33 molecules/nm2, respectively. Defect creation via the replacement of the BTC3− linker with the IP2− linker slightly in HKUST-1 skeleton did not affect H2 uptake. Both Li-doping and defect creation significantly enhanced H2 uptake to 3.03 wt%, which was caused by the coordination of Li ions with free carboxylic groups of the created defects via IP replacement.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Global warming caused by CO2 emissions and the depletion of fossil fuels has created an urgent demand for environmentally friendly alternative energy systems [1]. Hydrogen (H2) is an important alternative energy source to fossil fuels. A H2-based energy system using fuel cells is expected to be central to a sustainable, recycling-oriented society owing to its high energy efficiency, low emissions of environmentally hazardous substances such as CO2 and NOX, and its ability to be reproduced using solar energy. However, the major challenge in realizing a H2 economy using fuel cells is its storage [2,3,4]. The U.S. Department of Energy requires on-board H2 storage systems of fuel-cell vehicles with 5.5 wt% or 40 kg/m3 of H2 tanks by 2025 [5].
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which are crystalline porous materials consisting of coordination bonds between organic linkers and metal ions/clusters, have emerged as promising materials for H2 storage, owing to their exceptionally high surface area and pore volume [6,7,8]. At a low temperature (77 K) and high pressure, MOFs show exceptionally good H2 uptake, for example, the NU-1103 MOF has exhibited an H2 uptake of 13.0 wt% at 77 K and 100 bar [9]. However, because of the weak interaction between the MOF wall and H2 molecules, the H2 uptake at ambient temperatures is significantly smaller (just 2.8 wt% at 295 K and 100 bar for NU-1103 [9]). To overcome this weak interaction, the impregnation of strong adsorption sites into MOFs has been suggested as a way to improve the H2 uptake. Li+ ions are promising candidates for such an application owing to their low atomic weight and high affinity for molecular H2 as a result of charge-induced dipole interactions [10,11]. Theoretical investigations into Li-doped MOFs have suggested that H2 capacities of over 4.5 wt% under ambient conditions are achievable [12,13]. While experimental work is yet to reach those levels, the results thus far have been promising. For example, Li+-doped hydroxyl-MIL-53(Al) and MIL-53(Al) improved the H2 uptake at 77 K and 1 bar from 0.5 wt% to 1.7 wt% and from 1.66 wt% to 1.84 wt%, respectively [14,15]; Li+-exchanged NOTT-201 and MOF-5 exhibited the enhancement of H2 uptake from 0.96 wt% to 1.02 wt% and from 1.23 wt% to 1.39 wt%, respectively [16,17]; Li+-doped MIL-101 exhibited the enhancement of H2 uptake from 1.54 wt% to 2.65 wt% [18]. Methods for Li+ doping include the reduction of the MOF skeleton via organometallic lithium [14], Li exchange with protons of hydroxyl-modified MOFs [17,19] or anionic MOFs [16], and the thermal treatment of LiNO3-impregnated MOFs [15,18,20]. The thermal treatment of LiNO3-MOF, by which NO3– anions in the LiNO3-impregnated MOF is thermal decomposed to NO and/or N2O gas at 200 °C [15], is preferred because Li doping can be achieved under moderate conditions compared with the other two methods.
Another way to enhance H2 uptake is to create defects in the MOF skeletons that lack coordination bonding between linkers and metals. The exposed linker and metals act as strong adsorption sites that enhance gas adsorption (H2 [21], CO [22], CO2 [23], and C3H8 [24]). By replacing the organic linker in the parent MOF structure with a partially fragmented linker, defects can be created without altering the MOF structure [25]. In another way, the number of defects can be changed via the synthesis procedure [26].
We recently developed a continuous spray synthesis method that forms MOF nanocrystals in a short time via evaporation of droplets of a sprayed MOF precursor solution [27,28]. Rapid MOF crystallization using this method forms many missing bonds that enhance the H2 uptake [26,29]. This method also enables the preparation of nanoparticle composite MOFs by adding nanoparticles to a sprayed solution [30,31]. Similar to nanoparticle incorporation, LiNO3 is also expected to be incorporated into HKUST-1 by adding it to the sprayed solution. Thus, the spray synthesis method enables both Li-doping and defect creation for the enhancement of the H2 storage capacity of MOFs.
In this study, we prepared a Li-doped HKUST-1 MOF (Cu3(BTC)2; H3BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid) via thermal decomposition of NO3− in LiNO3-HKUST-1, synthesized via the spray-assisted synthesis method and subsequent thermal decomposition in a vacuum. In addition, we partially substituted H3BTC with isophthalic acid (IP = 1,3-benzenedicarboxylic acid) to form more defects in the HKUST-1 skeleton (defected-HKUST-1). Furthermore, we demonstrated both Li doping and defect creation into HKUST-1 via spray synthesis. We evaluated the crystallinity using X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements, porous characteristics using nitrogen adsorption measurements, and H2 adsorption properties at 77 K.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, 99%), lithium nitrate (LiNO3, 99%), 1 M HCl aqueous solution (for volumetric analysis), copper standard solution (Cu 1000), lithium standard solution (Li 1000), 20% deuterium chloride solution in D2O (DCl/D2O, 99.5%) N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99%), and ethanol were purchased from Fuji-film Wako Pure Chemical Co. (Osaka, Japan), and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate (H3BTC, 98%) and dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO-d6, 99% contains 1% TMS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Burlington, MA, USA). All reagents were used without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of Precursor Solution of Li-Doped HKUST-1 (Li-HKUST-1)

The precursor solution for Li-HKUST-1 was a mixture of 5 mL of 0.75 mM Cu(NO3)2 aqueous solution and 10 mL of 0.25 mM H3BTC solution in a co-solvent containing 5 mL each of ethanol and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). First, 0.026–0.259 g of LiNO3 was added to the Cu(NO3)2 solution before mixing with the H3BTC solution. The Li/Cu ratios were 10, 20, and 200 mol%. Li-HKUST-1 samples obtained from these solutions are denoted as Li-10, Li-20, and Li-200, respectively. HKUST-1 without Li+ was synthesized using the same procedure but without the addition of LiNO3.

2.3. Preparation of Precursor Solutions of Defect-HKUST-1 (d-HKUST-1) and Li-Doped Defect-HKUST-1 (Li-d-HKUST-1)

An amount of isophthalic acid (IP) was added to the H3BTC solution. The ratio of IP/(IP+H3BTC) in the organic linker solution was varied as 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mol%, without changing the total organic linker concentration (0.25 mM); 10 mL of the organic solution was mixed with 5 mL of a 0.75 mM Cu(NO3)2 aqueous solution. The d-HKUST-1 samples obtained from these solutions are denoted as d6.25, d12.5, and d25, respectively. To prepare Li-d-HKUST-1, 0.026 g of LiNO3 was added to an aqueous Cu(NO3)2 solution at a 10 mol% of Li/Cu ratio. The Li-d-HKUST-1 samples obtained from these solutions are denoted as Li-d6.25, Li-d12.5, and Li-d25, respectively.

2.4. Spray Synthesis of Li-HKUST-1, d-HKUST-1, and Li-d-HKUST-1

Li-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1 were synthesized using a homemade spray dryer, which consisted of a two-fluid nozzle, a spray chamber equipped with an inlet of swirling air to prevent deposition loss of droplets, a heating tube, and a filter holder [29]. The precursor solution was fed into the nozzle at a flow rate of 3 mL/min and sprayed with clean air at a flow rate of 12 L/min. Swirling air was supplied at a flow rate of 30 L/min and temperature of 180 °C. The sprayed droplets were then heated in a heating tube at 200 °C. The samples were then collected using a glass filter, washed with water and ethanol, ultrasonicated, and centrifugated to eliminate residual precursors [27]. After centrifugation, samples were dried at 60 °C for 3 h. Thermal decomposition of NO3– ions was conducted at 200 °C under vacuum for 5 h.

2.5. Characterization

Powder XRD patterns were recorded on a Miniflex 600 instrument (Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (wavelength 1.5406 Å). Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (SPS3000, Seiko Instrument Inc., Chiba, Japan) measurements were conducted for the quantitative analysis of the Li and Cu species in the samples. Before the ICP-AES measurements, 10 mg of each sample was dissolved in 1 mL of 1 M HCl aqueous solution. After dissolution, deionized water was carefully added to the solution until the volume reached 10 mL. The concentrations of Li and Cu in the sample solution were confirmed via the emission intensities at 670.784 and 327.396 nm for Li and Cu, respectively. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements were carried out on an automated micropore gas analyzer (AUTOSORB-1-MP, Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) at 77 K after sample activation at 180 °C and 0.1 Pa for 6 h. The specific surface areas of the samples were calculated from nitrogen adsorption isotherms using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method in the range of 0.01 < P/P0 < 0.05. The micropore volumes were calculated using the t-plot method. To determine the IP ratio in the samples, the samples were digested via sonication in a mixture of DCl/D2O (35% solution) and DMSO-d6. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian System 500 spectrometer. In the 1H NMR spectra, the ratio of the dicarboxylic acids was determined by comparing the integrals for the signal at δ = 8.64 ppm (H3BTC) with those for the signals at δ = 8.48, 8.18, and 7.69 ppm (IP).

3. Results

3.1. Li-HKUST-1

Li-HKUST-1 was prepared by changing the Li/Cu ratio in the precursor solution to 10, 20, and 200 mol% (denoted as Li-10, Li-20, and Li-200, respectively). Figure 1a shows the XRD patterns of HKUST-1, Li-10, Li-20, and Li-200. All Li-HKUST-1 samples exhibits patterns attributed to HKUST-1, indicating that HKUST-1 is successfully formed even in the presence of LiNO3. The peak intensities of Li-10 and Li-20 are almost the same. However, that of Li-200 is slightly smaller, which indicates that the crystallinity of Li-200 is lower than that of Li-10 and Li-20; this is due to the excess amount of LiNO3 present. LiNO3 would be precipitated during droplet evaporation, which prevented the crystallization of HKUST-1 in droplets. Our previous study on the fabrication of the nanocomposites of HKUST-1 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles also showed that an excess amount of nanoparticles prevents crystallization [31].
Figure 1b shows the nitrogen adsorption isotherms of the samples. Li-10 and Li-20 show almost the same type-I isotherm as HKUST-1, whereas Li-200 shows a decrease in adsorption at all relative pressures. The BET surface areas, as summarized in Table 1, are 1705 m2/g for HKUST-1, 1548 m2/g for Li-10, 1706 m2/g for Li-20, and 1251 m2/g for Li-200. The small BET surface area of Li-200 is attributed to its low crystallinity, as revealed by the XRD pattern.
The Li/Cu ratios in Li-HKUST-1 were determined via elemental analysis using ICP-AES, and they were determined to be 0.29, 0.24, and 0.93 mol% in Li-10, Li-20, and Li-200, respectively, indicating the presence of Li in all three samples (Table 1). The Li/Cu ratio in Li-HKUST-1 is much lower than that in the precursor solution because of the dissolution and removal of LiNO3 by washing.
Figure 1c shows the H2 adsorption isotherms of the samples at 77 K. H2 uptakes of the samples are summarized in Table 1. The H2 uptake of HKUST-1 is 2.37 wt% at 1 bar, which is consistent with that of our previous result [29]. Li-10 exhibits the same H2 uptake as HKUST-1, even though its surface area was smaller. Li-20, the surface area of which is the same as that of HKUST-1, exhibits a higher H2 uptake of 2.47 wt%. Meanwhile, Li-200 exhibits a lower H2 uptake (1.95 wt%), owing to the decrease in surface area.
Previous studies on Li doping using LiNO3 suggested that Li ions were coordinated with the free carboxyl groups via solid-state NMR and XPS analyses [15,20]. Scheme 1 presents the possible defects generated via the spray synthesis method. The HKUST-1 crystal structure is constructed from paddlewheels formed via the coordination bonds of four BTC carboxyl groups and two Cu ions. Rapid crystallization during droplet evaporation would form two types of defects, which are exposed linkers and metals. Li ions would coordinate with free carboxyl groups of the exposed linker, which would act as the additional adsorption sites for H2 molecules.

3.2. Li-d-HKUST-1

To intentionally introduce defects into the HKUST-1 skeleton, the organic ligand H3BTC of HKUST-1 was partially replaced with IP. Defected-HKUST-1 (d-HKUST-1) was prepared by changing the ratio of IP/(IP+H3BTC) in the organic linker solution to 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mol% (denoted as d6.25, d12.5, and d25, respectively). Li-defected-HKUST-1 (Li-d-HKUST-1) was prepared with an IP/(IP+H3BTC) ratio and Li/Cu ratio of 10 mol% (denoted as Li-d6.25, Li-d12.5, and Li-d25, respectively). Table 2 summarizes the Li/Cu ratio, IP ratio, BET surface areas, and H2 uptakes at 77 K and 1 bar of the samples.
Figure 2a shows the XRD patterns of d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1. All samples exhibit patterns attributed to HKUST-1, indicating that the replacement of H3BTC with IP and further Li impregnation does not affect the crystallization of HKUST-1 via the spray synthesis method. The Li/Cu ratio was analyzed using ICP-AES. It was found that the Li contents in Li-d6.25, Li-d12.5, and Li-d25 are 0.64, 0.85, and 0.51 mol%, respectively; these are higher than that in the case without IP (0.29 mol% of Li-10). The ratios of IP in d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1 were measured via 1H NMR after dissolution of the samples. The NMR spectra of d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1 are shown in Figures S1 and S2. The ratio of IP/(BTC+IP) calculated by integrating the signal at δ = 8.64 ppm for H3BTC with the signals at δ = 8.48, 8.18, and 7.69ppm for IP are listed in Table 2. Although the ratios are slightly lower than those in the precursor solution, IP was successfully introduced to the HKUST-1 crystal structure.
Figure 2b,c show the N2 adsorption isotherms of d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1, respectively. The BET surface areas of d6.25 and Li-d6.25 were 1714 and 1687 m2/g, respectively, which were similar to those of HKUST-1, indicating that there was no change in pore structure owing to low IP replacement. Conversely, with increasing IP ratio, the BET surface areas decreased to 1609, 1569, 1544, and 1330 m2/g for d12.5, d25, m2/g, Li-d12.5, and Li-d25, respectively. From the literature, the defect creation via IP replacement increased with BET surface area [25,32]. However, the results of this study show a lower BET surface area, which would be due to slightly lower crystallinity. The crystallization via the spray synthesis method occurred in <1 s. Presumably, the presence of IP, the incorporation of which is considered thermodynamically unstable, hindered crystallization in the short period and reduced the BET surface area. The lower IP ratio in the sample than that in the precursor solution is also due to the low crystallinity.
Figure 3a shows the H2 adsorption isotherms of d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1 at 77 K. The H2 uptake of d-HKUST-1 reaches 2.42 wt%, which is almost consistent with that of HKUST-1. Conversely, Li-d-HKUST-1 exhibits higher H2 uptake than HKUST-1 except for Li-d25. In particular, Li-d12.5 exhibits 3.03 wt% of H2 uptake at 77 K and 1 bar, which is 27% higher than that of HKUST-1. To confirm whether the improved H2 adsorption on Li-d12.5 is reproducible, the other two samples were prepared. Figure 3b shows the isotherms of the three samples. The H2 uptakes at 1 bar were 3.03, 3.06, and 2.88 wt% with no significant difference, indicating the reproducibility of the enhancement of H2 adsorption by combining Li-doping and defect creation via IP replacement.
The enhancement of H2 uptake in Li-d-HKUST-1 is discussed by considering defects. The possible defects in d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1 are the three additional defects shown in Scheme 2, as well as the two defects shown in Scheme 1. Defect types A and B have been proposed in the literature [22,25,32]. Using Cu(NO3)2 as the copper source, type B defects are more abundant [25]. However, considering the amount of IP, it is unlikely that all four linkers were IP. There may be defects, such as type B’, with exposed BTC linkers. Similar to the discussion on Li-HKUST-1, the free carboxylic groups of type B’ defects coordinated with that of Li ions, which act as additional adsorption sites on H2 molecules, resulting in an increase in H2 uptake.
Finally, we compared the results of other studies on Li doping into MOF. Table S1 summarizes the Li-doping agents, the ratio of Li to metal, BET surface area, and H2 uptakes of other Li-doped MOFs. Compared with the improvements of 10–72% in H2 uptake by Li-doping, an improvement of 27% for Li-d12.5 is not significantly high. However, the absolute H2 uptake of Li-d12.5 is 3.03 wt% at 77 K and 1 bar, and this is higher than those of most of the Li-doped MOFs. Furthermore, the amount of Li is lower than those of other Li-doped MOFs, and therefore, there is potential for further improvements in H2 uptake by increasing the Li-doping amounts.

4. Conclusions

Li doping and defect creation were performed on spray-synthesized HKUST-1 to improve its H2 adsorption properties. Li-doping was conducted via LiNO3 incorporation and subsequent thermal decomposition of NO3−. Li-HKUST-1 resulted in the enhancement of H2 uptake from 2.37 wt% for the non-treated MOF to 2.47 wt%, at 77 K and 1 bar. Defect creation in HKUST-1 was conducted via partial replacement of the original linker, H3BTC, with a fragmented linker, IP, which resulted in a H2 uptake up to 2.42 wt%. Combining Li-doping and defect creation significantly improved H2 uptake to 3.03 wt% (27% enhancement). This research provides a facile and efficient process for the fabrication of a MOF-based H2 storage material with additional adsorption sites resulting from the presence of Li cations and defects.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16155416/s1, References [33,34,35] are cited in the supplementary materials; Figures S1 and S2: 1H NMR spectra of the digested samples; Table S1: Comparison of Li doping agent, Li/metal ratio, surface area, and H2 uptake at 77 K and 1 bar for other Li-doped MOFs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.; methodology, M.K. and T.M.; validation, M.K. and T.M.; investigation, M.K. and T.M.; resources, M.K. and M.S.; data curation, M.K. and T.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.; writing—review and editing, M.K., T.M., and M.S.; visualization, M.K.; supervision, M.K.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, M.K. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) no. 16H06128 and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) no. 20K05209 and 21K04750 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stocker, T.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.-K.; Tignor, M.; Allen, S.; Boschung, J.; Nauels, A.; Xia, Y.; Bex, V.; Midgley, P. (Eds.) Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jena, P. Materials for Hydrogen Storage: Past, Present, and Future. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rivard, E.; Trudeau, M.; Zaghib, K. Hydrogen Storage for Mobility: A Review. Materials 2019, 12, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sule, R.; Mishra, A.K.; Nkambule, T.T. Recent Advancement in Consolidation of MOFs as Absorbents for Hydrogen Storage. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 12481–12499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. DOE. Technical Targets for Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Vehicles. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-onboard-hydrogen-storage-light-duty-vehicles (accessed on 3 October 2022).
  6. Murray, L.J.; Dincă, M.; Long, J.R. Hydrogen Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1294–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ren, J.; Langmi, H.W.; North, B.C.; Mathe, M. Review on Processing of Metal-Organic Framework (MOF) Materials towards System Integration for Hydrogen Storage. Int. J. Energy Res. 2015, 39, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shet, S.P.; Shanmuga Priya, S.; Sudhakar, K.; Tahir, M. A Review on Current Trends in Potential Use of Metal-Organic Framework for Hydrogen Storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 11782–11803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Farha, O.K.; Yazaydın, A.Ö.; Eryazici, I.; Malliakas, C.D.; Hauser, B.G.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Nguyen, S.T.; Snurr, R.Q.; Hupp, J.T. De Novo Synthesis of a Metal-Organic Framework Material Featuring Ultrahigh Surface Area and Gas Storage Capacities. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lochan, R.C.; Head-Gordon, M. Computational Studies of Molecular Hydrogen Binding Affinities: The Role of Dispersion Forces, Electrostatics, and Orbital Interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 1357–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kubo, M.; Ushiyama, H.; Shimojima, A.; Okubo, T. Investigation on Specific Adsorption of Hydrogen on Lithium-Doped Mesoporous Silica. Adsorption 2011, 17, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, S.S.; William, A.G., 3rd. Lithium-Doped Metal-Organic Frameworks for Reversible H2 Storage at Ambient Temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8422–8423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, G.; Meng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Guo, X.; Deng, K.; Ding, L.; Lu, R. Porous MOF-205 with Multiple Modifications for Efficiently Storing Hydrogen and Methane as Well as Separating Carbon Dioxide from Hydrogen and Methane. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 7517–7528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Himsl, D.; Wallacher, D.; Hartmann, M. Improving the Hydrogen-Adsorption Properties of a Hydroxy-Modified MIL-53(Al) Structural Analogue by Lithium Doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48, 4639–4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kubo, M.; Shimojima, A.; Okubo, T. Effect of Lithium Doping into MIL-53(Al) through Thermal Decomposition of Anion Species on Hydrogen Adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 10260–10265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, S.; Lin, X.; Blake, A.J.; Walker, G.S.; Hubberstey, P.; Champness, N.R.; Schröder, M. Cation-Induced Kinetic Trapping and Enhanced Hydrogen Adsorption in a Modulated Anionic Metal–Organic Framework. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kubo, M.; Hagi, H.; Shimojima, A.; Okubo, T. Facile Synthesis of Hydroxy-Modified MOF-5 for Improving the Adsorption Capacity of Hydrogen by Lithium Doping. Chem. Asian J. 2013, 8, 2801–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Panchariya, D.K.; Kumar, E.A.; Singh, S.K. Lithium-Doped Silica-Rich MIL-101(Cr) for Enhanced Hydrogen Uptake. Chem. Asian J. 2019, 14, 3728–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mulfort, K.L.; Farha, O.K.; Stern, C.L.; Sarjeant, A.A.; Hupp, J.T. Post-Synthesis Alkoxide Formation within Metal-Organic Framework Materials: A Strategy for Incorporating Highly Coordinatively Unsaturated Metal Ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3866–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, L.; Niu, Z.; Jin, X.; Tang, L.; Zhu, L. Effect of Lithium Doping on the Structures and CO2 Adsorption Properties of Metal-organic Frameworks HKUST-1. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 12865–12870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chuvikov, S.V.; Berdonosova, E.A.; Krautsou, A.; Kostina, J.V.; Minin, V.V.; Ugolkova, E.A.; Klyamkin, S.N. Peculiarities of High-Pressure Hydrogen Adsorption on Pt Catalyzed Cu-BTC Metal-Organic Framework. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 4277–4286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, W.; Kauer, M.; Halbherr, O.; Epp, K.; Guo, P.; Gonzalez, M.I.; Xiao, D.J.; Wiktor, C.; LIabrés I Xamena, F.X.; Wöll, C.; et al. Ruthenium Metal-Organic Frameworks with Different Defect Types: Influence on Porosity, Sorption, and Catalytic Properties. Chemistry 2016, 22, 14297–14307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Usman, M.; Iqbal, N.; Noor, T.; Zaman, N.; Asghar, A.; Abdelnaby, M.M.; Galadima, A.; Helal, A. Advanced Strategies in Metal-Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture and Separation. Chem. Rec. 2021, 22, e202100230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iacomi, P.; Formalik, F.; Marreiros, J.; Shang, J.; Rogacka, J.; Mohmeyer, A.; Behrens, P.; Ameloot, R.; Kuchta, B.; Llewellyn, P.L. Role of Structural Defects in the Adsorption and Separation of C3 Hydrocarbons in Zr-Fumarate-MOF (MOF-801). Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 8413–8423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barin, G.; Krungleviciute, V.; Gutov, O.; Hupp, J.T.; Yildirim, T.; Farha, O.K. Defect Creation by Linker Fragmentation in Metal-Organic Frameworks and Its Effects on Gas Uptake Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 6914–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chaemchuen, S.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, K.; Mousavi, B.; Phatanasri, S.; Jaroniec, M.; Verpoort, F. Defect Formation in Metal–Organic Frameworks Initiated by the Crystal Growth-Rate and Effect on Catalytic Performance. J. Catal. 2017, 354, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kubo, M.; Saito, T.; Shimada, M. Evaluation of the Parameters Utilized for the Aerosol-Assisted Synthesis of HKUST-1. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 245, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kubo, M.; Sugahara, T.; Shimada, M. Facile Fabrication of HKUST-1 Thin Films and Free-Standing MWCNT/HKUST-1 Film Using a Spray-Assisted Method. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 312, 110771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kubo, M.; Ishimura, M.; Shimada, M. Improvement of Production Efficiency of Spray-Synthesized HKUST-1. Adv. Powder Technol. 2021, 32, 2370–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kubo, M.; Moriyama, R.; Shimada, M. Facile Fabrication of HKUST-1 Nanocomposites Incorporating Fe3O4 and TiO2 Nanoparticles by a Spray-Assisted Synthetic Process and Their Dye Adsorption Performances. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 280, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kubo, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Shimada, M. Spray Synthesis of Pd Nanoparticle Incorporated HKUST-1, and Its Catalytic Activity for 4-Nitrophenol Reduction. Adv. Powder Technol. 2022, 33, 103701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, W.; Kauer, M.; Guo, P.; Kunze, S.; Cwik, S.; Muhler, M.; Wang, Y.; Epp, K.; Kieslich, G.; Fischer, R.A. Impact of Synthesis Parameters on the Formation of Defects in HKUST-1. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, S.; Lin, X.; Blake, A.J.; Thomas, K.M.; Hubberstey, P.; Champness, N.R.; Schröder, M. Enhancement of H2 Adsorption in Li+-Exchanged Co-Ordination Framework Materials. Chem. Commun. 2008, 6108–6110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mulfort, K.L.; Wilson, T.M.; Wasielewski, M.R.; Hupp, J.T. Framework Reduction and Alkali-Metal Doping of a Triply Catenating Metal-Organic Framework Enhances and Then Diminishes H2 Uptake. Langmuir 2009, 25, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xiang, Z.; Hu, Z.; Yang, W.; Cao, D. Lithium Doping on Metal-Organic Frameworks for Enhancing H2 Storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 946–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 05416 g001
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns, (b) N2 adsorption isotherms, and (c) H2 adsorption isotherms of HKUST-1 (black), Li-10 (red), Li-20 (blue), and Li-200 (purple).
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns, (b) N2 adsorption isotherms, and (c) H2 adsorption isotherms of HKUST-1 (black), Li-10 (red), Li-20 (blue), and Li-200 (purple).
Materials 16 05416 g001
Materials 16 05416 sch001
Scheme 1. Different types of defects created via the spray synthesis method. (black, red, and blue balls represents hydrogen, oxygen, and copper atoms, respectively).
Scheme 1. Different types of defects created via the spray synthesis method. (black, red, and blue balls represents hydrogen, oxygen, and copper atoms, respectively).
Materials 16 05416 sch001
Materials 16 05416 g002
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and N2 adsorption isotherms for (b) d-HKUST-1 and (c) Li-d-HKUST-1.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns and N2 adsorption isotherms for (b) d-HKUST-1 and (c) Li-d-HKUST-1.
Materials 16 05416 g002
Materials 16 05416 g003
Figure 3. (a) H2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K of d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1 and (b) reproducibility test for Li-d12.5.
Figure 3. (a) H2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K of d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1 and (b) reproducibility test for Li-d12.5.
Materials 16 05416 g003
Materials 16 05416 sch002
Scheme 2. Possible defects in d-HKUST-1. (black, red, and blue balls represents hydrogen, oxygen, and copper atoms, respectively).
Scheme 2. Possible defects in d-HKUST-1. (black, red, and blue balls represents hydrogen, oxygen, and copper atoms, respectively).
Materials 16 05416 sch002
Table 1. Summary of the elemental analysis, and N2 and H2 adsorption measurements for Li-HKUST-1.
Table 1. Summary of the elemental analysis, and N2 and H2 adsorption measurements for Li-HKUST-1.
SampleLi/Cu
(mol%)		BET
Surface Area
(m2/g)		H2 Uptake
at 77 K and 1 Bar
(wt%)
HKUST-1017052.37
Li-100.2915482.37
Li-200.2417062.47
Li-2000.9312511.94
Table 2. Summary of elemental analysis, and N2 and H2 adsorption measurements for d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1.
Table 2. Summary of elemental analysis, and N2 and H2 adsorption measurements for d-HKUST-1 and Li-d-HKUST-1.
SampleLi/Cu
(mol%)		IP/(BTC+IP)
(%)		BET
Surface Area
(m2/g)		H2 Uptake
at 77 K and 1 Bar
(wt%)
d6.2504.817142.42
d12.5010.316092.41
d25022.215692.23
Li-d6.250.644.216872.63
Li-d12.50.8510.915443.03
Li-d250.5119.913302.14
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kubo, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Shimada, M. Enhancement of Hydrogen Adsorption on Spray-Synthesized HKUST-1 via Lithium Doping and Defect Creation. Materials 2023, 16, 5416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155416

AMA Style

Kubo M, Matsumoto T, Shimada M. Enhancement of Hydrogen Adsorption on Spray-Synthesized HKUST-1 via Lithium Doping and Defect Creation. Materials. 2023; 16(15):5416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kubo, Masaru, Tomoki Matsumoto, and Manabu Shimada. 2023. "Enhancement of Hydrogen Adsorption on Spray-Synthesized HKUST-1 via Lithium Doping and Defect Creation" Materials 16, no. 15: 5416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155416

APA Style

Kubo, M., Matsumoto, T., & Shimada, M. (2023). Enhancement of Hydrogen Adsorption on Spray-Synthesized HKUST-1 via Lithium Doping and Defect Creation. Materials, 16(15), 5416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop