Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Conical and Cylindrical Implants Inserted in an In Vitro Post-Extraction Model Using Low-Density Polyurethane Foam Blocks
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Al2O3 Nanoceramics via Low Temperature Spark Plasma Sintering of Amorphous Powders
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation and Optimization of the Auxiliary Cathode for Inter-Electrode Discharge Electric Field in Microarc Oxidation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of TiO2 on the Voltage Holdoff Capacity of Cr/Mn-Doped Al2O3 Ceramic in Vacuum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Solubility and Valence Variation of Ce in Low-Alkali Borosilicate Glass and Glass Network Structure Analysis

1
State Key Laboratory of Environment-Friendly Energy Materials, School of Materials and Chemistry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
2
China Building Materials Academy, Beijing 100024, China
3
Fundamental Science on Nuclear Wastes and Environmental Safety Laboratory, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(14), 5063; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16145063
Submission received: 16 June 2023 / Revised: 4 July 2023 / Accepted: 15 July 2023 / Published: 18 July 2023

Abstract

:
Low-alkali borosilicate glass was used as the immobilization substrate, and Ce was used to replicate the trivalent and tetravalent actinides, in order to create simulated waste glass through melt heat treatment. The valence of Ce and solubility of CeO2 in waste glass were studied as well as its network structure and thermal and chemical stability. The solubility of Ce in waste glass was examined by XRD and SEM. The network structure was examined by Raman spectroscopy. The valence of Ce was determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Thermal analysis and product consistency (PCT) were employed to determine the thermal and chemical stability of waste glasses. The results show that the solubility of cerium in low-alkali borosilicate glasses is at least 25.wt.% and precipitates a spherical CeO2 crystalline phase when it exceeds the solid solution limit; Ce is immobilized in the glass by entering the interstices of the glass network. Depolymerization and the transition from [BO3] to [BO4] occurs when CeO2 doping levels rise. About 60 percent of Ce4+ is converted to Ce3+, and the thermal stability of glass rises then falls with the increase of CeO2. All samples exhibit strong leaching resistance, with the average mass loss of Ce at 28 days being less than 10−4 gm−2d−1.

1. Introduction

As a highly efficient and clean energy source, nuclear power has been vigorously developed in China. By 2020, nuclear power will already account for 4.8% of China’s total electricity generation [1]. The nuclear power industry in China uses a closed nuclear fuel cycle technology path, in which uranium and plutonium are converted into mixed oxide material during spent fuel reprocessing and then recycled as nuclear fuel [2,3,4]. The high-level radioactive waste (HLW) generated by this process contains 95% uranium, 1% plutonium, and 4% other actinides and various fission products, all of which are highly radioactive, toxic, and have long half-lives [5,6,7]. It is essential to properly dispose of HLW since it is of major concern if it penetrates the ecosystem [8]. The disposal of high-level radioactive waste in China comprises immobilization in an inert substrate and subsequent deep geological disposal in a geological repository [8,9,10]. Glass solidification is currently the only industrially available technology for treating HLW, and borosilicate glass is considered to be a good glass solidification substrate due to its good chemical durability and irradiation resistance [7,11,12]. All elements in HLW can be accommodated in borosilicate, but the low solubility of some long-lived radioactive actinides, such as Np, Pu, Cm, and Am, in borosilicate glass can limit the development of glass curing technology. Thus, it is crucial to increase the solubility of these long-lived radioactive elements in glass curing substrates [13,14,15,16].
As the energy released during the decay of radionuclides can cause irreparable damage to humans, it cannot be used directly in experimental research. Cerium was chosen to simulate the actinides for experimental studies because of the similar chemical properties of cerium and actinide. The ionic radii of Ce3+/4+, Pu3+/4+, and Np3+/4+ are similar (8 coordination: Pu4+ = 0.096 nm, Np4+ = 0.098 nm, Ce4+ = 0.097 nm; 6 coordination: Pu4+ = 0.086 nm, Np4+ = 0.087 nm, Ce4+ = 0.087 nm, Pu3+ = 0.100 nm, Np3+ = 0.110 nm, Ce3+ = 0.101) [17]. The results of Wang et al. showed that 10% of Ce could be included in iron phosphate glasses, and when doping was above the solid solution limit, monazite crystals (CePO4) precipitated [18]. Yu et al. showed that the solid solution limit of Ce in multiple alkaline-earth borosilicate glasses and glass-ceramic-hardened actinides did not exceed 13% [19]. In the research of Lopez et al., the solubility of Ce3+ in glass is higher than that of Ce4+; alkalinity affects the redox equilibrium of the glass melting process, and increasing the alkali oxide in the glass shifts the redox equilibrium towards a higher oxidation state, thus affecting the reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+ [20].
In this experiment, a commercially prepared low-alkali borosilicate glass was chosen as the substrate, and Ce was used to simulate the tetravalent and trivalent actinides to investigate the structural properties of solubility and valence distribution of Ce in low-alkali borosilicate glass to provide a new glass substrate option for treating HLW or give new ideas for the development of formulations for waste immobilization.

2. Experiment

2.1. Simulated Waste Glass Preparation

A commercially prepared low-alkali borosilicate glass was used as the hardening substrate (see Table 1), and a homogeneous mixture was prepared by adding CeO2 (aladdin, 99.99%) at different mass fractions (10%, 20%, 25%, 30%) and grinding in an agate mortar for 30 min. A total of 25 g of the mixture was then put in a ceramic crucible and subjected to melt heat treatment in a muffle furnace (from room temperature to 800 °C for 2 h at a rate of 10 °C·min−1 and then to 1400 °C for 3 h at the same rate). Glass melt was poured onto a hot graphite plate for air quenching to obtain simulated waste glass after heat treating. Samples for thermal analysis were subjected to water quenching.

2.2. Characterization

Glass powders were examined for physical phase analysis using an X’ Pert PRO diffractometer (Panalytical, Malvern, UK) (Cu Kα (λ = 1.54056 Å) radiation at room temperature (2θ = 10–80°, 40 kV, 40 mA)). The sample morphology and the composition of the precipitated crystalline phases were analyzed by a Carl Zeiss Ultra 55 field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in the accelerating voltage of 15 kV and a working distance of approximately 7.2 mm. Raman spectra in the 200–2000 cm−1 range were recorded using a CCD detector (In via, Renishaw, UK). An ESCALAB 250 Xi (1486.6 ev Al-ka radiation, 12 kv, 120 w, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to acquire X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of powder samples at room temperature to determine the content of different valence states of elemental Ce in the glass. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC SDT Q600, TA Instruments Inc, New Castle, DE, USA) for glass powders with particle sizes less than 200 mesh was used to measure the typical temperature of glass from room temperature to 1300 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min in an air environment.

2.3. Anti-Leaching Experiment

A static leaching test was carried out to assess the resistance of the samples to leaching using the ASTM Product Conformance Test (PCT) method [21]. One gram of cleaned and dried glass powder, sieved between 100 and 200 mesh, and 10 mL of deionized water were placed in a Teflon vessel in a hydrothermal reactor and placed in a blast furnace set at 90 ± 2 °C for 28 d to simulate a geological reservoir environment [22]. After 28 d, the leachate was removed using a syringe with a filter device and the leachate was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, 7700X, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to determine the concentration of each element (Si, B, Ca) in the leachate, and the normalized mass loss NLi (g·m−2) was calculated using Equation (1) [23]:
N L i = C i · V f i · S · t
where V is the volume of the leachate (m3), S is the exterior area of the sample powder (m2), and Ci is the percentage of the element i in the leachate. Fi is the mass fraction of the element i in the sample. S/V is the surface-area-to-volume ratio of glass powders, which was chosen to be 2000 m−1 based on the standard. ∆t represents the test duration.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical Phase and Microstructural Analysis

Figure 1 shows the XRD diffraction patterns of Cx (x is the wt.% of CeO2 in simulated waste glass) series samples, and it can be seen that all samples have a wide hump in the diffraction angle θ = 20~34° range, which is due to the process-ordered structural characteristics of the amorphous glass. When x ≤ 25, the hump indicates that the entire sample is in a homogeneous glassy state, and Ce is well contained in the glass network. Sharp diffraction peaks begin to develop at x = 30, and as the value of x grows, the intensity of the peaks increases. This indicates that when the mass percent of CeO2 is doped to 30%, the crystalline phase begins to precipitate in the waste glass and the amount of precipitated crystalline phase grows as the extent of doping increases. By comparing with the standard PDF card data from the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD), the diffraction peaks of the precipitated crystalline phase were in agreement with the characteristic diffraction peaks of cerium squared (CeO2; PDF#78-0694) [19]. It is shown that the loading of CeO2 in low-alkali borosilicate glasses is at least 25 wt.%, and the precipitated crystalline phase of cerium squared is formed when the solid solution limit is exceeded.

3.2. SEM and EDX Analysis

The backscattered scanning electron microscope (SEM) plots and the energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX) spectra of the cross sections of the simulated waste glass having different levels of CeO2 doping are displayed in Figure 2a–d correspond to the simulated waste glasses with CeO2 doping of 10%, 20%, 25%, and 30%, respectively. Significantly, homogeneous glassy phases with no second phase are present in Figure 2a–c. In Figure 2d, in addition to the glassy phase, a new spherical second phase appears, and there are depressions in the interval between the two phases, demonstrating that liquid–liquid phase separation occurred during the glass melting process. Figure 2e illustrates the results of scanning the EDX spectrum at position f in Figure 2d to identify the precipitated second phase. The second phase is primarily composed of Ce and O, with a minor amount of Si (likely a small bit of glass phase superposed on the top), so the precipitated second phase is judged to be CeO2. The results show that when the doping amount of CeO2 is less than or equal to 25%, the solidified body is a homogeneous glass phase. When the doping amount is 30%, the CeO2 crystalline phase is precipitated. This is in agreement with the X-ray diffraction results.

3.3. Raman Analysis

Raman spectra are scattering spectra that are created when molecules or atomic groups vibrate or rotate under the influence of potent monochromatic light, causing an energy level jump. Through Raman spectroscopy, information can be obtained regarding the unique spectra of each molecule or atomic group in the sample, as well as changes in the short-range ordered structure of the sample [24]. Therefore, the effect of CeO2 on the change of network structure of low-alkali borosilicate glass can be analyzed by Raman spectroscopy. Figure 3 shows the Raman spectra of C0, C10, C20, C25, and C30. As can be seen in the figure, the C30 Raman spectrum exhibits a characteristic scattering peak at 467 cm−1, which corresponds to CeO2, according to the literature [18]. This agrees with the findings of the XRD. The scattering peaks at 400–650 cm−1 are related to the bending vibrations of the Si-O-Si bonds in [SiO4] [25,26]. The vibrations of the Si-O-Si bonds of polyadic (>5), tetragonal, and ternary rings are 442 cm−1,492 cm−1 and 604 cm−1, respectively [27]. The inset (a) in Figure 3 illustrates that C0 scattering is predominantly located at 450 cm−1, indicating that most of the bending vibrations of Si-O-Si originate from the polyadic ring. The peak shifts towards higher wave numbers with the addition of CeO2, implying a transition from polyadic rings to tetragonal and ternary rings [28]. Because of CeO2, free oxygen has been introduced into the system. In the presence of an increasing amount of free oxygen, the O/Si ratio increases, and the Si-O-Si link is broken, generating non-bridging oxygen, causing the depolymerization of the glass network. The B-O-B stretching vibration in the [BO3] units is responsible for the band between 1300 and 1500 cm−1 in inset (b) and the scattering peak at 640 cm−1 in inset (a) [29]. The peaks associated with [BO4] units exhibit a significant weakening followed by a slight enhancement from 0 to 25, while those associated with [BO3] units exhibit an enhancement followed by a weakening, demonstrating that Ce causes a shift in [BO3] and [BO4]. The increase in [BO3] occurs at the expense of [BO4] units, when CeO2 doping is minimal, and the high field strength Ce3+/4+ breaks the B-O bond in [BO4] units to convert [BO4] to [BO3]. With the increase of CeO2, a significant amount of free oxygen is introduced from CeO2, and [BO3] combines with the free oxygen to change into [BO4] [3,30]:
O 2 + 2 B O 3 / 2 2 B O 4 / 2
The stretching vibration of Si-O-Si in the Qn units (n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, representing Si in the [SiO4] coupled to 4, 3, 2, 1 non-bridging oxygen, respectively) is what causes the broadband in the region of 800~1200 cm–1 [30,31]. To analyze the variation of various Qn units more intuitively, Gaussian fit was performed for the broadband in the range of 800~1200 cm−1, and the fitting results were obtained as shown in Figure 4. The units of Q0, Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 are, respectively, 850–870 cm−1, 900–920 cm−1, 950–970 cm−1, 1050–1100 cm−1, and 1120–1190 cm−1 [29,32]. Figure 4f shows the change of Qn from 0% to 25% of CeO2 doping. As can be observed, Qn in C0 are Q2, Q3, and Q4, with Q3 making up the biggest percentage, showing that the low-alkali borosilicate glass network is mostly made up of several interconnected silica-oxygen tetrahedral groups (ternary, quaternary, and polycyclic rings). The tetrahedral group is dominated by polycycles because the Raman peaks for C0 in the 400~650 cm−1 range are primarily centered at 450 cm−1. The presence of Q0 and Q1 units as well as a considerable decrease in Q3 units after the addition of CeO2 demonstrate the disruption of the glass network structure and depolymerization. Q0, Q1, and Q2 increase smoothly from C10 to C30, but Q3 exhibits a slow-to-fast drop. When the doping of CeO2 increases from 10% to 20%, there is barely any difference in Q3, but when it increases from 10% to 20%, Q3 dramatically decreases, indicating that silicate network structure is stable when CeO2 doping is ≤20% and Ce is immobilized in the glass matrix by entering the silicate network gap. As the degree of polymerization grows from Q0 to Q4 and the resistance to Ce ions leaving the network structure increases, Ce can be effectively immobilized in the glass with more Qn (n = 3,4) [33,34]. The network gap accommodates an increasing number of Ce ions as the Ce doping level rises, and the Si-O link is broken by the strength of the ionic field, which significantly reduces the degree of polymerization. When the doping level hits 30%, Ce separates from the network structure to form a CeO2 crystal phase. In conclusion, Ce is effectively immobilized in low-alkali borosilicate glasses because the [SiO4] units in the network are dominated by Q3.

3.4. Valence Analysis of Ce

Ce has two chemical valence states (+3 and +4) in glass melt. The solubility of Ce in glass differs from different valence states. According to the literature, the solubility of Ce3+ is higher than Ce4+, so it is essential to analyze the valence composition of Ce in glass melt to understand the higher solubility of Ce in low-alkali borosilicate glass. During this experiment, the valence composition of Ce was analyzed by XPS. Figure 5 shows the XPS spectra of samples with different CeO2 doping amounts. Fitting 10 peak data of the Ce 3d XPS spectra and the ratios of Ce3+ and Ce4+ of C10, C20, C25, and C30 are shown in Table 1; +3 and +4 valence states of Ce are present in all samples, as shown in Figure 5. The fitted peaks of the Ce 3d spectra consist of six peaks belongs to Ce4+0, ν1, ν2, ν0′, ν1′, ν2′) and four peaks belonging to Ce3+ (u1′, u0′, u1, u0). Due to the coupling of the orbital and spin motions of the electrons, there is spin-orbit splitting (SOS) in the Ce 3d orbitals. Six peaks belonging to Ce4+0, ν1, ν2, ν0′, ν1′, ν2′) and four peaks belonging to Ce3+ (u1′, u0′, u1, u0) make up the fitted peaks of the Ce 3d spectra. Spin-orbit splitting (SOS) occurs in the Ce 3d orbitals as a result of the electrons’ orbital and spin movements being coupled. The top of the diagram shows five peaks that are part of the 3d3/2 spin-orbit splitting doublet, whereas the bottom five peaks (u1, u0, v0, v1, v2) are part of the 3d5/2 spin-orbit splitting doublet [17,35,36]. The respective peak areas of Ce3+ and Ce4+ were used to calculate the relative concentrations of the two valence states, and the findings are displayed in Table 2. The Ce3+/Ce4+ content ratio was close to 1.43 when the percentage of doped cerium was 10% or 30%, while the Ce3+/Ce4+ content ratio was slightly higher than 1.6 when the concentration of doped cerium was between 10% and 30%, which is higher than the results of Yu and Tong et al. [19,28]. Increasing the alkalinity of the melt biases the redox equilibrium towards a high oxidation state. Therefore, cerium is more soluble in low-alkali borosilicate glasses than in conventional borosilicate glasses.

3.5. Thermal Stabilization

The disintegration of radionuclides produces heat and raises the temperature of the curing body when waste glass is subjected to deep geological treatment. High temperature can cause crystallization of the curing body, and the volume of the curing body may be changed, which can affect the chemical durability and mechanical properties of the curing body. Therefore, in addition to a high waste-loading rate, good thermal stability is also required for the curing body. The thermal analysis of the samples with varied CeO2 doping levels are shown in Figure 6. It is concluded that the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the simulated waste glass is higher than 800 °C and tends to increase and then decrease with the increase of CeO2.
The fact that Ce enters the glass network structure by forming Si-O-Ce bonds, which increases network connectivity, is likely what causes the increase in Tg. Additionally, a stronger Ce ionic field can prevent other ions from moving freely, requiring more energy to complete structural rearrangement. The decrease of Tg may be attributed to the introduction of large amounts of free oxygen with the incorporation of excess Ce, causing the glass network to become highly depolymerized [37,38]. In general, the precipitation temperature of the glass, Tc ≈ Tg + 50 °C, and the temperature of the cured body during deep geological treatment does not usually exceed 500 °C [39]. Therefore, the simulated waste glass cured bodies made from low-alkali borosilicate have good thermal stability.

3.6. Anti-Leaching Features

The product consistency method (PCT) was used to assess the samples’ resistance to leaching from C10 to C30 [21]. After the 28 d test, the normalized leaching rates of Si (NLSi), B (NLB), Ca (NLCa), and Ce (NLCe) were determined, as shown in Figure 7. All samples were in line with the requirements of the Chinese nuclear industry standard [40]. The normalized leaching rates of Si and B were 3.37 × 10−4~4.65 × 10−4gm−2d−1 and 5.26 × 10−4~6.99 × 10−4gm−2d−1, respectively, and the normalized leaching rates of Ca were 1.05 × 10−3~1.12 × 10−3gm−2d−1 lower than those of basalt and multi-alkaline earth borosilicate glasses. Ce was not detected in C10, C20, and C25, and the normalized leaching rate of Ce in C30 was 2.3 × 10−5 gm−2d−1. In summary, the simulated actinide curing bodies prepared from low-alkaline borosilicate glasses have good chemical durability.

4. Conclusions

A commercial low-alkali borosilicate glass substrate was used in this paper for the preparation of simulated waste glass through melt-heat treatment, and XRD, SEM, Raman spectroscopy, XPS, thermal analysis, and PCT were used to analyze the structure and features of the samples, leading to the following conclusions:
-
The solubility of simulated trivalent actinide nucleophile Ce in low-alkali borosilicate glasses is ≥25%, and spherical CeO2 crystalline phases precipitate when the Ce doping exceeds the solid solution limit.
-
The Raman results show that the addition of Ce causes glass network depolymerization, and Ce is retained in the glass matrix of low-alkali borosilicate glasses by adsorbing into the gaps in the glass network. Furthermore, Ce causes a shift between [BO3] and [BO4].
-
In low-alkali borosilicate glasses, more than 50% of Ce4+ is converted to Ce3+, and the low-alkali borosilicate glass has good thermal stability and resistance to leaching for immobilizing simulated actinide Ce.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z.; data curation, L.Y. and X.D.; formal analysis, L.Y., J.H. and J.F.; investigation, L.Y., Z.C.; methodology, L.Y. and X.Z.; resources, Y.Z.; supervision, Y.Z., J.H. and Z.C.; writing—original draft, L.Y.; writing—review and editing, X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Defense Key Discipline Laboratory of Nuclear Waste and Environmental Safety, China, Grant number 17kfk03, and the State Key Laboratory of Environmentally Friendly Energy, China, Grant number 21fksy11.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ping, L.; Hongyi, Y.; Lin, L.; Changzhi, X.; Yuan, L. Development of Nuclear Power in China under Carbon Neutrality Target. J. Energy Conversat. Technol. 2023, 41, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rodríguez-Penalonga, L.; Soria, B.Y.M. A Review of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategies and the Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Technologies. J. Energy 2017, 10, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Caurant, D.; Majérus, O. Glasses and Glass-Ceramics for Nuclear Waste Immobilization. In Encyclopedia of Materials: Technical Ceramics and Glasses; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 762–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gin, S.; Abdelouas, A.; Criscenti, L.J.; Ebert, W.L.; Ferrand, K.; Geisler, T.; Harrison, M.T.; Inagaki, Y.; Mitsui, S.; Mueller, K.T.; et al. An International Initiative on Long-Term Behavior of High-Level Nuclear Waste Glass. J. Mater. Today 2013, 16, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Caurant, D.; Loiseau, P.; Majérus, O.; Aubin-Chevaldonnet, V.; Bardez, I.; Quintas, A. Glasses, Glass-Ceramics and Ceramics for Immobilization of Highly Radioactive Nuclear Wastes; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stefanovsky, S.V.; Shiryaev, A.A.; Zubavitchus, J.V.; Veligjanin, A.A.; Marra, J.C. Valence State and Speciation of Uranium Ions in Borosilicate Glasses with a High Iron and Aluminum Content. J. Glass. Phys. Chem. 2009, 35, 141148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Day, D.E.; Wu, Z.; Ray, C.S.; Hrma, P. Chemically Durable Iron Phosphate Glass Wasteforms. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1998, 241, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J. On Area-Specific Underground Research Laboratory for Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in China. J. Rock. Mech. Geotech. 2014, 6, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wang, J. High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal in China: Update 2010. J. Rock. Mech. Geotech. 2010, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, X.G.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, Z.; Cai, M.; Li, X.; Li, P.F.; Chen, L.; Wang, J. Influence of Thermal Treatment on the Thermal Conductivity of Beishan Granite. Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng. 2018, 51, 2055–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tong, Q.; Liu, S.; Huo, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Zheng, K.; Cui, Z.; Zhu, Y. Structure, Crystallization Behavior and Chemical Stability Analysis of Nd3+-Basaltic Glasses for Immobilizing Simulated Trivalent Actinides. J. Nucl. Mater. 2023, 574, 154194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shaydullin, S.M.; Belanova, E.A.; Kozlov, P.V.; Remizov, M.B.; Dvoryanchikova, E.M. Investigation of Borosilicate Glasses with Simulated HLW Components and Determination of Their Chemical Durability. Chem. Techno Acta 2021, 8, 8015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chouard, N.; Caurant, D.; Majérus, O.; Guezi-Hasni, N.; Dussossoy, J.L.; Baddour-Hadjean, R.; Pereira-Ramos, J.P. Thermal Stability of SiO2–B2O3–Al2O3–Na2O–CaO Glasses with High Nd2O3 and MoO3 Concentrations. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 671, 84–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Icenhower, J.P.; Steefel, C.I. Dissolution Rate of Borosilicate Glass SON68: A Method of Quantification Based upon Interferometry and Implications for Experimental and Natural Weathering Rates of Glass. J. Geochimi. Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 157, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kidari, A.; Dussossoy, J.L.; Brackx, E.; Caurant, D.; Magnin, M.; Bardez-Giboire, I. Lanthanum and Neodymium Solubility in Simplified SiO2-B2O 3-Na2O-Al2O3-CaO High Level Waste Glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95, 2537–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, H.; Wu, L.; Xu, D.; Wang, X.; Teng, Y.; Li, Y. Structure and Chemical Durability of Barium Borosilicate Glass–Ceramics Containing Zirconolite and Titanite Crystalline Phases. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015, 466, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meng, C.; Ding, X.; Li, W.; Zhao, J.; Yang, H. Phase Structure Evolution and Chemical Durability Studies of Ce-Doped Zirconolite–Pyrochlore Synroc for Radioactive Waste Storage. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 5207–5215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Liao, Q.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, J.; Qu, X.; Gong, Z.; Fu, X.; Zhu, Y. Effect of Cerium Oxide on Phase Composition, Structure, Thermal Stability and Aqueous Durability of Sodium-Iron-Boron-Phosphate Based Glasses. J. Nucl. Mater. 2021, 556, 153199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, H.; Xin, R.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Zheng, K.; Zhao, J.; Zhan, L.; Xu, C.; Wan, W.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Crystallization Behavior, Quantitation of Ce3+/Ce4+ and Chemical Stability Analysis of Multiple Alkaline Earths Borosilicate Glasses for Immobilizing Simulated Tetravalent Actinides. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2021, 558, 120642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lopez, C.; Deschanels, X.; Bart, J.M.; Boubals, J.M.; Den Auwer, C.; Simoni, E. Solubility of Actinide Surrogates in Nuclear Glasses. J. Nucl. Mater. 2003, 312, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. ASTM C1285-21; Standard Test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear, Hazardous, and Mixed Waste Glasses and Multiphase Glass Ceramics: The Product Consistency Test (PCT). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2002.
  22. Corkhill, C.L.; Cassingham, N.J.; Heath, P.G.; Hyatt, N.C. Dissolution of UK high-level waste glass under simulated hyperalkaline conditions of a colocated geological disposal facility. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2013, 4, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Thorat, V.S.; Mishra, R.K.; Sudarsan, V.; Kumar, A.; Tyagi, A.K.; Kaushik, C.P. Leaching Studies on Borosilicate Glasses for the Immobilization of High-Level Radioactive Waste in the Pellet Form Subjected to Aggressive Test Conditions. J. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2019, 42, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yongqi, S.; Zuotai, Z. Structural Roles of Boron and Silicon in the CaO-Si-B2O3 glasses Using FTIR Ramna and NMR Spectroscopy. J. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2015, 46, 1549–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kline, J.; Tangstad, M.; Tranell, G. A Raman Spectroscopic Study of the Structural Modifications. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2015, 46, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bechgaard, T.K.; Mauro, J.C.; Bauchy, M.; YuanZheng, Y.; Lamberson, L.A.; Jensen, L.R.; Smedskjaer, M.M. Fragility and Configurational Heat Capacity of Calcium Aluminosilicate. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2017, 461, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Iguchi, Y.; Kashio, S.; Goto, T.; Nishina, Y.; Fuwa, T. Raman Spectroscopic Study on the Structure of Silicate Glass. J. Can. Metall. Quart. 1981, 20, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tong, Q.; Liu, S.; Huo, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, A. Structure and Stability Analysis of Basaltic Glasses for Immobilizing Simulated Actinides Nd, Ce and La. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2023, 600, 122043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Angeli, F.; Villain, O.; Schuller, S.; Charpentier, T.; de Ligny, D.; Bressel, L.; Wondraczek, L. Effect of Temperature and Thermal History on Borosilicate Glass Structure. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 054110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. El-Damrawi, G.; El-Egili, K. Characterization of novel CeO2-B2O3 glasses, structure and properties. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 2001, 299, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dantas, N.O.; Ayta, W.E.F.; Silva, A.C.A.; Cano, N.F.; Silva, S.W.; Morais, P.C. Effect of Fe2O3 Concentration on the Structure of the SiO2–Na2O–Al2O3–B2O3 Glass System. Spectrochin. Acta A 2011, 81, 140–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fabian, M.; Gergely, F.; Osan, J.; Cendak, T.; Kesari, S.; Rao, R. Structural Investigation of Borosilicate Glasses Containing Lanthanide Ions. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Caurant, D.; Majérus, O.; Fadel, E.; Quintas, A.; Gervais, C.; Charpentier, T.; Neuville, D. Structural Investigations of Borosilicate Glasses Containing MoO3 by MAS NMR and Raman Spectroscopies. J. Nucl. Mater. 2010, 396, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, K.; Luo, B.; Zhang, H. Immobilization of CeO 2 Using Single-Phase Zirconolite and the Chemical Stability Analysis. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 115526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dawkins, K.; Rudyk, B.W.; Xu, Z.; Cadien, K. The PH-Dependant Attachment of Ceria Nanoparticles to Silica Using Surface Analytical Techniques. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 345, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gin, S.; Jollivet, P.; Tribet, M.; Peuget, S.; Schuller, S. Radionuclides Containment in Nuclear Glasses: An Overview. Radiochim. Acta 2017, 105, 927–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tan, P.; Shu, X.; Wen, M.; Li, L.; Lu, Y.; Lu, X.; Chen, S.; Dong, F. Characteristics of Cerium Doped Aluminosilicate Glass as Simulated Radioactive Waste Forms: Effect on Structures and Properties. Prog. Nucl. Energ. 2022, 150, 104299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prakash, A.D.; Singh, M.; Mishra, R.K.; Valsala, T.P.; Tyagi, A.K.; Sarkar, A.; Kaushik, C.P. Studies on Modified Borosilicate Glass for Enhancement of Solubility of Molybdenum. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2019, 510, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, C.; Huo, J.; Zhang, X.; Huo, Y.L.; Zhu, Y. Study on the Solubility, Structure and Chemical Durability of Molybdenum in Diopside Glass. Glass 2022, 49, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. EJ 1186-2005; Characterization of Radioactive Waste Forms and Packages. Nuclear Industry Standard in China, Commission for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense: Beijing, China, 2005.
Figure 1. XRD diffraction patterns of Cx.
Figure 1. XRD diffraction patterns of Cx.
Materials 16 05063 g001
Figure 2. (ac) SEM figure of C10, C20, C25, C30; (e) EDX spectra of point f in (d) image region.
Figure 2. (ac) SEM figure of C10, C20, C25, C30; (e) EDX spectra of point f in (d) image region.
Materials 16 05063 g002
Figure 3. The Raman spectra of C0, C10, C20, C25, and C30.
Figure 3. The Raman spectra of C0, C10, C20, C25, and C30.
Materials 16 05063 g003
Figure 4. (ae) Deconvolution map; (f) variation of different types of Qn units from 0% to 25%.
Figure 4. (ae) Deconvolution map; (f) variation of different types of Qn units from 0% to 25%.
Materials 16 05063 g004
Figure 5. Results of XPS spectra fitting with various doped CeO2.
Figure 5. Results of XPS spectra fitting with various doped CeO2.
Materials 16 05063 g005
Figure 6. Thermal analysis of the samples with different CeO2 doping levels.
Figure 6. Thermal analysis of the samples with different CeO2 doping levels.
Materials 16 05063 g006
Figure 7. Normalized mass losses of Si, B, and Ca of C10~C30 samples.
Figure 7. Normalized mass losses of Si, B, and Ca of C10~C30 samples.
Materials 16 05063 g007
Table 1. Components of the low-alkali borosilicate glass.
Table 1. Components of the low-alkali borosilicate glass.
ComponentsSiO2Al2O3B2O3CaOMgOFe2O3FeOTiO2K2ONa2O
Mass fraction(%)54.4314.416.5722.570.640.340.120.330.230.36
Table 2. Data of the 10 fitted peaks of the Ce3d orbital XPS spectra and the ratios of Ce3+ and Ce4+ for C10, C20, C25, and C30.
Table 2. Data of the 10 fitted peaks of the Ce3d orbital XPS spectra and the ratios of Ce3+ and Ce4+ for C10, C20, C25, and C30.
SampleC10AreaC20AreaC25AreaC30Area
u1′900.3311,761.62900.2819,172.5900.1923,900.06900.5420,066.49
u1881.9215,709.68881.8625,657.34881.833,547.52881.8326,054.39
u0′905.4113,709.63904.7624,776.7905.1126,859.23905.4220,155.53
u0886.6819,682.76886.5532,886.86886.4441,498.19886.4135,150.47
v0′903.0512,777.1902.5812,789.6902.9223,148.48903.2920,306.55
v1′908.155146.83907.3910,236.81907.789193.86907.976999.5
v2′918.722246.95917.462967.11917.655282.2917.413978.63
v0884.4916,176.4884.3425,356.57884.2930,577.06884.1725,644.03
v1889.194481888.956740.43917.655282.2888.78711.89
v2897.142162.72896.982960.69897.082863.49898.314887.07
A 1.42 1.68 1.65 1.44
B 0.59 0.63 0.62 0.59
Note: A = Ce3+/Ce4+; B = Ce3+/(Ce3++Ce4+).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Huo, J.; Cui, Z.; Zhang, X.; Dong, X.; Feng, J. Solubility and Valence Variation of Ce in Low-Alkali Borosilicate Glass and Glass Network Structure Analysis. Materials 2023, 16, 5063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16145063

AMA Style

Yang L, Zhu Y, Huo J, Cui Z, Zhang X, Dong X, Feng J. Solubility and Valence Variation of Ce in Low-Alkali Borosilicate Glass and Glass Network Structure Analysis. Materials. 2023; 16(14):5063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16145063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Liu, Yongchang Zhu, Jichuan Huo, Zhu Cui, Xingquan Zhang, Xuanjiang Dong, and Jie Feng. 2023. "Solubility and Valence Variation of Ce in Low-Alkali Borosilicate Glass and Glass Network Structure Analysis" Materials 16, no. 14: 5063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16145063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop