Next Article in Journal
Mechanical, Leaching, and Microstructure Properties of Mine Waste Rock Reinforced and Stabilised with Waste Oyster Shell for Road Subgrade Use
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacteria and Soil Enzymes Supporting the Valorization of Forested Soils
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Stepped Heating on the Initial Growth of Oxide Scales on NiCrAlHf Bond Coat Alloy under Air and Water Vapor Atmospheres
Previous Article in Special Issue
Organo-Nanocups Assist the Formation of Ultra-Small Palladium Nanoparticle Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/ma15082915
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low Metal Loading (Au, Ag, Pt, Pd) Photo-Catalysts Supported on TiO2 for Renewable Processes

by
Francesco Conte
1,
Ilenia Rossetti
1,*,
Gianguido Ramis
2,
Cyril Vaulot
3,
Samar Hajjar-Garreau
3 and
Simona Bennici
3,*
1
Chemical Plants and Industrial Chemistry Group, INSTM Unit Milano-Università, Dip. Chimica, CNR-ISTM, Università degli Studi di Milano, via C. Golgi 19, 20133 Milan, Italy
2
INSTM Unit Genova, Dip. Ing. Chimica, Civile ed Ambientale, Università degli Studi di Genova, Via all’Opera Pia 15A, 16145 Genoa, Italy
3
Institut de Science des Materiaux, CNRS, IS2M UMR 7361, Université de Haute-Alsace, F-68100 Mulhouse, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(8), 2915; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082915
Submission received: 11 January 2022 / Revised: 21 March 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Paper in Section Catalytic Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photo-catalysts based on titanium dioxide, and modified with highly dispersed metallic nanoparticles of Au, Ag, Pd and Pt, either mono- or bi-metallic, have been analyzed by multiple characterization techniques, including XRD, XPS, SEM, EDX, UV-Vis and N2 adsorption/desorption. Mono-metallic photo-catalysts were prepared by wet impregnation, while bi-metallic photocatalysts were obtained via deposition-precipitation (DP). The relationship between the physico-chemical properties and the catalyst’s behavior for various photo-synthetic processes, such as carbon dioxide photo-reduction to liquid products and glucose photo-reforming to hydrogen have been investigated. Among the tested materials, the catalysts containing platinum alone (i.e., 0.1 mol% Pt/TiO2) or bi-metallic gold-containing materials (e.g., 1 wt% (AuxAgy)/TiO2 and 1 wt% (AuxPtz)/TiO2) showed the highest activity, presenting the best results in terms of productivity and conversion for both applications. The textural, structural and morphological properties of the different samples being very similar, the main parameters to improve performance were function of the metal as electron sink, together with optoelectronic properties. The high activity in both applications was related to the low band gap, that allows harvesting more energy from a polychromatic light source with respect to the bare TiO2. Overall, high selectivity and productivity were achieved with respect to most literature data.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide is a multi-purpose material used in many commercial applications and it is recognized as a good candidate for the development of semiconductors for photocatalytic processes [1,2]. When it is used as a photocatalyst, the incident light causes the electrons to be promoted from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), leaving a hole (h+) in the lowest energy state [3]. For solar light application, it is extremely important to select materials that have a narrow band gap (i.e., difference between the energy level of VB and CB) in order to absorb light of longer wavelength, since the ultimate goal of photo-catalysis is to exploit the visible region of the spectrum [4]. The electron-hole couple can be used to perform redox reactions that involve the chemical species absorbed over the photo-catalyst surface [5]. The holes will oxidize the substrates when the active material is employed in processes such as biomass reforming, while photo-excited electrons are useful to perform endergonic reactions like CO2 and H2O photo-reduction [6,7]. Both the electron and the hole are used for the photo-reforming reaction, to reduce H+ to H2 and to oxidise organic pollutants contained in water simultaneously [8], whereas H2O oxidation or the consumption of a sacrificial hole scavenger (HS) are involved in CO2 photoreduction.
Starting from the pioneering work of Fujishima and Honda [9], thousands of papers on the photo-catalytic activity of titanium dioxide and related compounds have been published so far [10,11]. Indeed, TiO2 based materials can be produced by low-cost synthesis and are resistant under most conditions, especially against photo-corrosion. The main drawbacks that limit the applicability of TiO2 at a larger scale are due to its wide band gap (BG) and fast electron-hole recombination. Both issues depend on the crystalline structure, since titanium dioxide exists in three polymorphs, which are anatase (BG = 3.20 eV), rutile (BG = 3.02 eV) and brookite (BG = 3.40 eV) [12,13]. Although such values are not the only ones widely accepted, the absorption of those semiconductors occurs in the UV-A region, allowing exploitation of less than 5% of the solar energy spectrum and severely limiting solar light application [14].
Various approaches have been developed in order to overcome this problem, such as thin layers preparation, doping and surface modification, e.g., through the dispersion of metallic nanoparticles over the photo-catalyst surface [15,16,17]. Among the possible co-catalysts, platinum is the most widely used metal because of its ability to develop a strong interaction with the TiO2 support [18], but also gold and silver are employed for enhancing the adsorption under visible light, due to the localized surface plasmonic resonance (LSPR) phenomenon [19,20,21]. Establishing a metal/TiO2 heterojunction modifies the charge transfer process on the semiconductor and determines the formation of a Schottky barrier [22]. The irradiation of the photo-catalyst is accompanied by electron flow from or to the metal isle (depending on work function value) and this decreases the recombination rate of the photogenerated electron-hole couple and enhances the charge separation [23]. Specifically, Pt is able to receive electrons from the titania surface and acts directly as reduction center for the adsorbed species, while Au injects electrons into the semiconductor [24]. In addition, combining metals over the same surface, such as Au/Ag and Au/Pt bi-metallic samples, is an effective way to further increase photo-catalyst activity [25]. The surface functionalization is usually carried out by photo-deposition, deposition-precipitation (DP) [21,26], wet impregnation (WI) [27], and by flame-spray pyrolysis (FSP) [28].
As for the selected applications, CO2 photo-reduction is particularly interesting because 40 billion tons of CO2 are released into the atmosphere each year. The objective is to convert the carbon dioxide into less harmful, or even useful, compounds, such as liquid fuels (e.g., organic acids, alcohols, etc.) [6,29]. TiO2-based materials have already proved to be effective in oxyanions photo-reduction in an aqueous environment [30] and also for CO2 activation, since the titania surface is able to interact with that molecule through the hydroxyl groups and oxygen vacancies [31,32]. The carbon dioxide is then reduced by subsequent injection of electrons to obtain, for instance, formic acid, methanol and methane [33,34,35].
On the other hand, the production of hydrogen implies the same type of mechanism, but occurs by the reduction of a proton or any other available oxidized hydrogen species. In addition, the focus is also on the reaction between the holes (photo-generated on the active material) and the organic compounds present in the reaction media; ideally, organic pollutants in water to accomplish simultaneous water treatment and hydrogen production [7,36]. Such organic compounds act as sacrificial HS, and, in general, alcohols or polyols, like glucose and other sugars, are reported to prevent holes’ accumulation in the valence band [21,27,37,38].
Although a similar mechanism is involved in both the photo-synthesis reactions (CO2 and H2O photoreduction), the similitude between the reactions and the features of the photocatalysts that are able to boost their activity and selectivity for both applications have not been fully clarified. Therefore, in this work we discuss the photo-catalytic activity of selected metal-promoted photo-catalysts for both these photo-synthetic applications, in light of the characterization results. Such extensive characterization has been missing so far and may lead to a better understanding of the photo-catalytic activity of our photo-catalysts. Specifically, the materials were made from commercial titanium dioxide (P25). The functionalization was carried out by DP and WI by depositing metallic Au, Ag, Pd, Pt, or various combinations of these metals, as co-catalysts. These materials were tested for CO2 photo-reduction into liquid fuels and in the production of H2 by photo-reforming of carbohydrates, in an attempt to try and identify the main features determining the catalytic performance.

2. Experimental

2.1. Catalyst Preparation

P25 is a commercial titanium dioxide supplied by Evonik (Essen, Germany) [39]. It was used in this form, without further adaptation.
Monometallic co-catalysts were obtained via wet impregnation over the pre-synthesized TiO2 and reduced under hydrogen flow at the appropriate temperature, as reported in [40]. Briefly, the selected quantity of metal precursor and titanium dioxide was added to a round flask containing distilled water. After 1 h stirring, the solution was evaporated under reduced pressure and the resulting powder was dried overnight in a conventional oven set at 105 °C. Then, the catalyst was reduced under hydrogen flow (3 mL/min, 1 atm) at high temperature (150–700 °C) in a tubular oven (Carbolite, Sheffield, UK). The reduction conditions were determined after Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR) analysis under H2 flow (40 mL/min, 10 vol% H2/N2 [41]). For each sample, a heating ramp of 5 °C/min and 3 h at the selected temperature was used. The maximum reduction temperature depended on the co-catalyst and it was 150 °C for Ag, 300 °C for Pd and 700 °C for Au and Pt [40].
Bi-metallic photo-catalysts were also prepared through deposition-precipitation synthesis [41], as this deposition technique allows more precise control of the composition. In detail, 1 wt% (AuxAgy) material was prepared by adding 0.07 mM AgCl solution (99% purity, Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), 0.03 mM HAuCl4 solution (99.99% purity, Sigma Aldrich) and distilled water until reaching 400 mL of volume and the desired ratio between the metals. Then, 0.10 mL of 87–90% hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, 1 wt%, Sigma Aldrich) was added under vigorous stirring, followed by addition of a 0.10 M NaBH4 solution (99% purity, Sigma Aldrich). The molar ratio between the reducing agent and the metal was 4:1 (mol/mol). The colloidal solution was stirred for 10 min in order to stabilize the nanoparticles so formed (NPs). Then, 1 g of titanium dioxide P25 was added to the flask, followed by 0.50 mL of concentrated H2SO4 (98.0%, Sigma Aldrich). The suspension was stirred for 1 h to allow deposition of the NPs over the TiO2 surface, then filtered under vacuum and washed three times with water and once with methanol. The obtained powder was dried in a conventional oven at 105 °C. The same procedure was adopted for the 1 wt% (AuxPtz) photo-catalyst, but the NaBH4/metal ratio was increased to 8 and no sulfuric acid was added. Photo-catalysts have been used and characterized as obtained. Metals loading was obtained by atomic absorption analysis (AAS) of the filtrate [39].
The two catalyst series were compared, but were clearly distinct. For monometallic samples a very simple procedure was used to prepare the catalysts. Impregnation is easily scalable and industrially viable, but does not allow very high dispersion at increasing loading. It was used for low loading metals addition, only. For bi-metallic samples, in order to have visible effect of the addition of the second metal and a sensitivity to variable concentrations, the overall load was increased. In order to keep dispersion safely high and deposition uniform we selected a sol immobilization procedure. Indeed, DP makes it possible to improve the control during deposition and to ensure the two different metal species are well dispersed and separated. This was essential to allow fine and controlled deposition of bi-metallic samples that were characterized by high metal loading. On the other hand, even if DP may also be used for the deposition of single metals, it was considered unnecessary, and would only add useless complexity to the preparation protocol when single metals and very low loading were planned. In such a case, the much simpler and scalable wet impregnation method was adopted.

2.2. Characterization

N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms of all samples were collected on an ASAP 2420 (Micromeritics Instrument, Norcross, GA, USA) apparatus after degassing the samples at 90 °C under vacuum (1 mm Hg) to remove water and other species adsorbed on the surface. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) linearization was used in the range 0.05–0.30 P/P° to calculate the specific surface area (SSABET). Barrett-Joyner-Halenda model (BJH) and density functional theory (DFT) were used to determine pore-size distribution from the adsorption branch assuming either slit-like or cylindrical pores. CO2 sorption curves at the temperature of 273 K were obtained on selected samples in order to obtain the micropores distribution.
Diffuse reflectance (DRS) UV-Vis spectra were obtained in the range 200–800 nm on a Lambda 750 (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA) spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere. Spectralon® was used as the reflectance standard (Labsphere Inc., North Sutton, NH, USA). The sampling rate was set to 1 nm while the slit width was 2 nm. The results were processed according to the Kubelka-Munk model, using Equation (1) to transform the reflectance spectra into the absorption spectra [42,43].
F ( R ∞ ) = ( 1 − R ∞ ) 2 2 R ∞
(F(R)hν)1/r (with r = 2 or ½ for direct and indirect band gap) were plotted versus hν to determine the band gap of each sample [44].
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images and Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDX) spectra were obtained using a JSM-7900F Schottky Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operating at an accelerating potential of 20 kV.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed through a Rigaku D III-MAX horizontal-scan powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) using the Cu-Kα radiation and a graphite monochromator on the diffracted beam in the range 10–90°. Characteristic reflections were assigned by comparison with the standard JCPDS card, 21–1272 for anatase and 21–1276 for rutile.

2.3. Activity Test

All the activity tests were carried out with an innovative high-pressure stainless steel photo-reactor, previously described [41,45]. The internal reactor volume was around 1.9 L. The reactor was generally charged with 1.2 L of solution, allowing ca. 0.1 L of headspace once the cap with the lamp was placed. A medium-pressure mercury lamp with peak emission at 365 nm and measured irradiance of 157 W/m2 was used. Each experiment was carried out at 80 °C by recirculation of hot water in the reactor jacket and under magnetic stirring to ensure the correct mixing of the solution.
For CO2 photo-reduction, the reactor was usually charged with 0.031 mg/L of photo-catalyst, 1.67 g/L of sodium sulfite (which acts as hole scavenger). The pH was set to 14 using sodium hydroxide, while carbon dioxide was dissolved in the reaction media by increasing the pressure up to 20 bar.
Carbohydrate photo-reforming for hydrogen production was performed at lower pressure (4 bar of N2), with catalyst loading of 0.25 g/L) and with 5 g/L of glucose as HS, so far identified as providing the best conditions.
As for the tests of photoreduction of CO2, the maximum error on chromatographic analysis was ca. 5%. Repetition of the same test under identical conditions led to an experimental error up to 10% for both applications, increasing to a maximum observed deviation of 19% in the case of very low productivity in the gas phase for H2. In the case of photo-reforming, the maximum experimental error on H2 productivity (based on 5 reproducibility tests) was ±7.3%, while on TOC analysis was 10.2% [46].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Diffuse Reflactance UV-Visible (DR UV-Vis)

The reflectance data were reported using Kubelka-Munk and fitted through the Tauc equation to calculate both the direct and indirect transition band gap, as reported in Figure 1. The main difference between those types of transition is that for semiconductors, characterized by a direct band gap, both the absorption and the emission allow photo-excited electrons, which are usually strong. In the case of an indirect transition, the electronic relaxation between the conduction and valence bands is forbidden, and the electron-hole pair needs to change both energy and momentum, leading to a weaker emission [47]. While anatase is reported to be an indirect band gap semiconductor, rutile and brookite are not clearly identified within one of these categories [48,49,50].
The optical properties of the presented materials are coherent with the expectations, since each functionalized photo-catalyst showed a band gap lower than that of the bare P25, as reported in Table 1. In more detail, silver and platinum presented a direct BG of 3.21 eV, while for gold it was 3.20 eV, against 3.45 of pure P25 (Figure 1a–d and Figure S1). The difference is lower when looking at the indirect band gap, since from the 3.22 eV of P25 it is possible to reach values as low as 3.10 eV in the case of Ag. All these three metals also showed surface plasmonic resonance (SPR) bands, in particular the band of gold was clearly visible at 560 nm and Ag showed a peak of lower intensity around 490 nm [19,25]. On the other hand, Pt showed something similar to Ag, though its SPR bands are usually located at lower wavelengths, depending on size of the metal NPs [12]. Strong bands were observed even in the case of bi-metallic samples, in the catalysts containing gold and silver, such as 1 wt% (Au8Ag2), but not when higher loading of platinum was employed (i.e., 1 wt% (Au2Pt8)), since the curve was flat at the wavelength typical of the SPR effect [27,51,52]. In general, BG values were the same or slightly lower for bimetallic samples, depending on the composition. BG for 1 wt% (Au2Pt8) was 3.20 eV and for both 1 wt% (AuxPtz) and 1 wt% (AuxAgy) the direct BG was lower when the percentage of gold was reduced, while only in the case of an indirect band gap of 1% (Au8Ag2) was its value higher than that of P25.
Deposing metal nanoparticles over TiO2 surface is a well-known method to improve its light harvesting capability, since the metal and the semiconductor are electrically connected and the electrons can flow from or to the metal. The direction of the electron flow depends on the position of its work function in respect to the conduction band (CB) of titania [9]. For example, platinum is capable of accepting electrons, and acting as a catalytic center of the species adsorbed on its surface, while gold can inject e- into the TiO2 semiconductor [3]. This effect can increase up to a certain limit with increasing metal load [21,41], after which a slight shielding effect by the metal predominates. A photo-catalyst loaded with 1% by weight of Au and Pt, such as 1 wt% (Au6Pt4), roughly corresponds to 0.24% mol Au and 0.16% mol Pt molar loading, which is higher than the 0.1% molar loading of the single metal co-catalyst (e.g., 0.1% mol Au). Additionally, the reduction of BG can be attributed to the partial reduction of TiO2 during metal reduction, which is a well-known method to adjust the BG of this semiconductor. Such a reduction can be catalyzed by the presence of the metal itself.

3.2. Textural Properties

The BET surface area and pore volume were obtained from N2 sorption isotherms collected at a temperature of −196 °C. The results reported in Figure 2a,b show that every sample was characterized by a type II isotherm with a hysteresis loop that can be defined as H2b, characteristic of mesoporous material with a narrow distribution of pores and a wide distribution of neck size [53]. Intra-particle porosity is best described by assuming a cylindrical pore shape, while for inter-particle porosity it was more appropriate to assume slit-like pores.
The textural properties of all the samples were quite similar to each other (see Table 2). The surface area of mono-metallic samples varied between 35 and 57 m2/g. The lowest value was attained with Pt. The BET SSA of the bi-metallic samples was generally equal to that of P25 TiO2, with the exception of 1 wt% (AuxPty), for which a decrease of surface area and porosity were evident. The same behavior was observed in the monometallic sample, since 1 mol% Pt showed quite a low surface area (33 m2/g). In general, however, the effect of the addition of metals was not impactful on the textural properties of the materials. Furthermore, while the reduction process for the mono-metallic samples occurred at high temperature and, in principle, can cause the collapse of pores and a loss in terms of surface area [11], bi-metallic samples were chemically reduced in milder conditions. However, the thermal treatment, even at the highest temperature, did not significantly affect the porosity of the samples. This behavior is probably due to the high temperature preparation of the native titania P25, which confers significant thermal resistance to sintering, when compared to titania obtained by hydrolysis (e.g., starting from titanium isopropoxide) [54].
Several photo-catalysts, including P25, 0.1 mol% Pt, 0.1 mol%Au and 1 wt% (Au2Pt8) were characterized by a strong interaction with nitrogen at the beginning of the adsorption process (see in the zoom in the 0–0.002 P/P°).
P25 showed some inter-particle microporosity (these materials are usually constituted by dense nanospheres, possibly condensing by leaving cavities between adjacent particles) that was only still present, after surface modification, for 0.1% Ag and AuxAgy samples (Supplementary Materials Figure S2). This behavior may be linked to the strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) that occurs between Pt and titania when the material undergoes a reduction process; especially when reduction is performed at high temperature and with a strong reducing agent (H2 and NaBH4 in our case) [10]. However, the t-plot method is not suitable to describe each sample, as in the case of P25, 0.1 mol% Pd, 0.1 mol% Ag. For these catalysts, the adsorption took place at very low pressure, which is linked to ultra-microporosity, that cannot be correctly quantified by N2 adsorption. Moreover, other models, such as Dubinin-Astakhov, are not really applicable since they are more suitable for carbon materials that strongly interact with the quadrupole moment of nitrogen [55,56]. The strong metal-support interaction mentioned above, which is observed in some cases, is likely to interfere with the adsorption process. Furthermore, SMSI is less likely to occur for gold and silver, which deposit with larger particles compared to Pt [57,58].
Lastly, the CO2 sorption curves were obtained for selected photo-catalysts and the results are consistent with those obtained with N2.

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX)

SEM-EDX analysis was performed on selected materials and the results are reported in Figure 3 and Figure S3 (see Supplementary Information File). All the samples were constituted of a uniform array of titania nanoparticles ca. 20 nm in size. It was observed that the morphology of the NPs did not change after addition of metals, nor did it change after calcination at high temperature (when relevant for monometallic samples). This further confirms the very good thermal resistance of titania P25.
The composition was checked locally by EDX, but because of the low metal load and the high metal dispersion, it was necessary to increase the acquisition time up to 12 min. The metal NPs were observed with difficulty through EDX mapping (see e.g., Figure S3 for one of the most visible materials), though the presence of the metal on the catalyst surface was confirmed to be in the desired loading by XPS analysis (vide infra).
The formation of a metal nanocluster of tens of nanometer was already reported, but usually concerned higher metal loading than that present in the here investigated samples [27,59]. Elemental mapping of the 1 wt% (Au6Pt4) sample highlighted only a small region of the nanoparticles in which both Au and Pt were deposited, but it was not possible to identify any metal NPs on its surface. For Au8Pt2 very small particles were visible at high magnification of 70,000×, while the backscatter detector (BED-C) allowed us to see smaller and more abundant NPs on the 0.1 mol% Au sample. Similar results were obtained with 1 wt% (AuxAgy) photo-catalysts (Figure S3 in Supplementary Information), since NPs were observed on the particle surface when the backscatter detector was used. Tentatively, it may be considered that bigger particles, thus more visible with EDX mapping and with a back scattering detector, were somehow formed with Pt, both when added alone or with another metal.
So far, it was not possible to identify if the co-catalysts were deposited in the form of alloy or as a separate single metal NP. Apparently, the location of Au and Pt in EDX maps (Figure S3) appear distinct from each other, suggesting they do not form an extensive alloy.

3.4. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

XPS spectra of selected photo-catalysts are illustrated in Figure 4 and in the Supplementary Information file (Figure S4). All the analyzed samples contained organic impurities (up to 11.15%) that have been associated with various organic moieties (C-C, C-H, C-O, C-C=O, O=C-O), based on the type of bonds evidenced by deconvolution of the peaks. The XPS peak intensity areas were obtained after subtracting a Shirley type background, since the component from the inelastic scattered electrons of the Ti3p and Ti3s peaks appear in the same region of Pt4f and Au4f core levels [60,61,62]. In general, the metal deposition process does not significantly influence the shape and intensity of the O1s and the Ti2p peaks of titania; the metals are probably too diluted and, as an example, the spectrum of 0.1 mol% Au is barely distinguishable from that of P25 (Figure 4a), at least for what concerns the Ti and O regions [63].
The main peak at 459 eV is due to Ti4+ species and overlaps with the small peak assigned to Ti3+ that can be found at 457 eV, especially in the spectra of 1 wt% (Au6Pt4) and 1 wt% (Au8Pt2). The presence of Ti3+ is due to the reduction process of the metallic active phase of the catalysts, which leads to partial reduction of the Ti4+ ion on the photo-catalyst surface, thus modifying its electronic properties and BG values. Ti4+ reduction can be catalyzed by the metal itself, but due to the low amount of Au and Pt, the Ti3+ peak is invisible, not visible on the Ti2p spectrum.
Regarding the metals, they are present in the reduced state. The peaks associated with Pt0 and Au0 are characterized by a low signal-to-noise ratio (Figure 4b), while signals are more intense in the case of bi-metallic samples, since the loading is higher than in mono-metallic catalysts. The characteristic peaks of gold were identified at 84 eV (4f7/2) and 88 eV (4f5/2). For platinum, peaks were detected at 71 eV (4f7/2) and 74 eV (4f5/2), while in the literature Pt2+ peaks are usually located at a slightly higher BE (ca. 72 and 75 eV [64,65,66]).
As a general observation, the active material was revealed to be stable after the synthesis and can be stored without undergoing significant oxidation. This is positive, because with such metals the presence of oxides may reduce the activity if not added on purpose and by controlling the distribution [67]. In addition, most of the samples also contained traces of aluminum oxide (around 76 eV). Lastly, according to the area of the peaks, it was found that the metal loading on the extreme surface was higher than 0.1% for the mono-metallic photo-catalysts (i.e., Au and Pt) and even two times more for the bi-metallic materials (Table 3) with the exception of 1 wt% (Au8Pt2). This over-concentration at the surface is expected, since the loading procedure deposits the metal only at the surface. Differently, in the case of 1 wt% (Au6Pt4) the ratio between the two elements is 2:1 rather than 3:2, while it becomes 7:1 for Au8Pt2 instead of the theoretical value of 4:1. So, there is a small portion of the platinum that is not visible at the surface. The missing platinum is likely to hide beneath the surface of the TiO2 support, or be covered with gold, as strong metal-support interactions (SMSI) may develop during the reduction process and the Pt particle may sink into the support and be covered by titania [11,18]. Au is less likely to develop this type of interaction [11,57,58].

3.5. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD spectra have been obtained for every photo-catalyst (Table 4 and Figure 5). As the metal loading was very small, no characteristic peaks related to metallic phases could be detected in diffractograms (Figure 5) [25]. The diffractograms evidenced only the characteristic phases of titania, anatase and rutile, which are well known for the P25 raw material. The reduction process did not have a significant impact on the crystalline phase composition of the bare TiO2 P25, as the anatase/rutile ratio of modified photo-catalysts did not differ from that of bare titania (ca. 70–80% anatase and 20–30% rutile), according to relative intensities of anatase main peak (25.4°) and rutile (27.4°). Based on the literature, once the amorphous TiO2 or the anatase phase is heated above 400 °C it starts to convert into the more stable rutile phase [21,27]. However, it has already been reported that P25 is mostly unaffected by thermal cycles that are necessary in order to reduce the noble metals added by impregnation [68]. In that case, gold delays the transformation of anatase into rutile [54].
Finally, crystallite size was calculated applying the Scherrer equation to the main reflection of each phase [69]. Anatase had, in general, lower crystal size than rutile. The size slightly increased upon thermal treatment following impregnation in the case of the mono-metallic samples. On the contrary, for the bi-metallic samples, chemical reduction was achieved with NaBH4 under ambient conditions. This did not alter the size of anatase crystals and even slightly decreased the size of the rutile phase. This point was interpreted by the formation of a larger quantity of defects (formation of oxygen vacancies) when reducing the rutile phase. This is visible for rutile, since it is more reducible than anatase [70].

3.6. Photo-Catalytic Tests

The photo-catalysts analyzed in this work have been used for various applications, including CO2 photo-reduction, and photo-reforming of organics for hydrogen production. Both these reactions represent photo-reduction processes, which exploit electrons photo-promoted in the conduction band of the semiconductor upon irradiation to reduce the target reactants, i.e., CO2 into reduced molecules, such as HCOOH, HCHO, CH3OH and CH4, or H+ to H2 in the case of photo-reforming. The complementary oxidation half reaction is achieved through the holes, which react with electron donating molecules, i.e., sodium sulfite in the case of CO2 photoreduction, and glucose (or other sacrificial organics in water) in the case of photo-reforming.
Blank experiments [41] have been carried out for the photo-reduction of CO2 by irradiating a solution at 80 °C and 8 bar, first without any catalyst nor HS and later with HS (1.68 g/L) but without a catalyst. In both cases, nil productivity, either in gas or liquid phases, were observed. Another test at the same temperature and pressure, using bare P25 under dark conditions, was performed without observing significant productivity. It cannot be excluded that some adsorption of CO2 may occur, though not quantifiable, due to its high concentration in the liquid phase and limited catalyst amount.
Tests in dark conditions were also performed for the photo-reforming of glucose, extensively described in [46], confirming that irradiation is necessary to obtain the products. Moreover, a negligible conversion was obtained by using the light source, but without a catalyst and/or HS.

3.6.1. Photo-Reduction of CO2

Figure 6 illustrates some of the most promising photo-catalysts employed for the conversion and valorization of carbon dioxide, which have also been reported elsewhere [41,71,72]. The most active material, at least in terms of formic acid productivity, is the bi-metallic photo-catalyst 1 wt% (Au2Ag8), leading to 9.5 mol/kgcat h (±5%) and outperforming the non-promoted titania P25 (3.2 mol/kgcat h (±5%)). Formic acid is used here as a key performance indicator to evaluate the activity, due to its high productivity in the selected conditions (basic pH, high operating pressure). On the other hand, hydrogen is also likely to be produced once the hole scavenger (sodium sulfite) conversion reaches 100%, so the organic products formed by photo-reduction of CO2 act as HS themselves. H2 productivity is on average 4.0 mol/kgcat h (±7.3%) for all the materials here compared, though this value is almost halved for 1 wt% (Au2Pt8). Interestingly, this catalyst has quite a low surface area (33 m2/g), despite being prepared via DP, if compared to the others, and a low total pore volume comparable with that of bare P25. So, this may negatively affect its performance, despite its having a low band gap.
All the catalysts have a relatively similar surface area, in the range of the native P25 material, while some of the photo-catalysts reported in literature are characterized by a surface area greater than the present ones, usually >100 m2/g, due to the different preparation techniques [25,59]. Regarding the textural properties, for 0.1 mol% Pt prepared through wet impregnation, the SSA value was quite a lot lower than for P25 TiO2 (34.9 m2/g vs. 41.4 m2/g) while 1 wt% (Au2Ag8) has 40.7 m2/g and it is higher in case of 1 wt% (Au6Pt4) (44.6 m2/g). What differs is that for all of them the total pore volume is doubled with respect to P25, but only in the case of Au2Ag8 was the micro porosity maintained after the treatment.
Regarding the BG, all the best three catalysts (i.e., 1 wt% (Au2Ag8), 1 wt% (Au6Pt4) and 0.1 mol% Pt) have a low direct band gap, since this value is 3.21 eV for both the bi-metallic and the mono-metallic samples, while the bare titania P25 has BG = 3.45 eV and exploits the worst activity of the selection. The UV lamp employed has its peak emission at 365 nm but the light is actually polychromatic. Being a medium-pressure mercury-type lamp, a lower band gap increases the amount of energy harvested from that source [12,13,47].
The present results show significant improvements with respect to most literature, since they demonstrate a photo-reactor setup unique in literature, operating at high pressure and high temperature (relative to the conventional conditions adopted in photocatalysis). Certain considerations can be made concerning the activity of our photo-active material. Table 5 reports the performance of several photo-catalysts based on P25 titanium dioxide and employed for the CO2 photo-reduction. As shown, the main species released during the treatment and their productivity mainly consist of liquid products (formic acid, methanol, formaldehyde) and gaseous ones (hydrogen, carbon monoxide, methane). In our setup, the main products are formic acid and, on demand, hydrogen, which comes from the photo-reforming of the organics formed from CO2, rather than directly from the water splitting. Indeed, in the selected conditions (24 h of reaction) the HS scavenger was always fully consumed, and, once this happens, the organics accumulated in the solution are reformed to obtain hydrogen [73]. Kaneco et al. [74] reported a very low productivity of these compounds when working at high pressure and in the presence of an organic hole scavenger. However, in that case a very high concentration of unmodified titania had been used, and it is likely that the system was limited by the shadowing effect. On the other hand, using our modified photo-catalysts in very low concentration and at high pressure leads to good performance in terms of organics productivity.

3.6.2. Photo-Reforming

The same photo-catalysts were used in the photo-reforming of glucose for H2 production. Selected results are reported in Figure 7, where the performance of the benchmark P25 TiO2 is compared to both the mono- and bi-metallic co-catalysts.
Glucose was selected as an HS to assess the activity of the photo-catalysts to perform reduction of water to hydrogen when a sacrificial electron donor is added to the mixture. Indeed, without the HS the performance of the system is limited by the slow evolution of oxygen, while glucose offers a way to rapidly quench the holes (direct oxidation) or the hydroxyl radicals produced by the photo-catalyst (indirect oxidation) [7,76,77].
The 1 wt% (Au6Pt4) was able to achieve hydrogen productivity of 4.1 mol/kgcat h (±7.3%) while 0.1 mol% Pd reached only 2.9 mol/kgcat h (±7.3%) and the benchmark P25 0.57 mol/kgcat h (±7.3%). Gas phase byproducts were also formed, such as CO2, CO, CH4 and C2 compounds (ethane and ethylene), in concentrations far lower than that of H2. The addition of the metal was essential for this application, due to its electron trapping effect, which allows improvement of the electron-hole separation. This prevents dissipative charge recombination and improves overall productivity.
Glucose conversion never reached values higher than 15 ± 0.12%) (1% (Au6Pt4). However, this is in line with the performance of similar materials found in literature [38].
Hydrogen evolution continuously rises during the photo-reforming treatment, as reported in Figure S5.
However, again, if looking at the BG values they seem to be strictly related to the photo-catalyst activity, since 0.1 mol% Pd was characterized by a direct BG of 3.33 eV and achieved 23% lower productivity than 0.1 mol% Pt (BG = 3.21 eV), despite having a greater surface area. On the other hand, 0.1 mol% Au had a BG of 3.2 eV, but also showed a SPR band at 560 nm, which positively influenced the photo-generation of electrons.
Gallo et al. [27] reported the photo-reforming of ethanol using a similar catalyst based on titania and loaded with 0.5 wt% of gold and 0.5% of platinum, obtaining hydrogen productivity as high as 7500 mmol/kgcat h. Our bi-metallic sample of 1 wt% (Au6Pt4) was the most similar in terms of composition, but its productivity was lower, since it reached 4100 mmol/kgcat h (±7.3%). However, it is necessary to consider that our photo-catalyst concentration was eight times lower and, in a broader context, the setup configuration was different. In particular, the necessity to operate at 4 bar in our experimental assembly, due to sampling methodology, disfavors product evolution in the gas phase, but most of all, a much simpler HS was used in the reported reference as ethanol, with respect to glucose, here used as a more complex substrate, representative of milk and food waste waters. On the other hand, the mono-metallic catalysts, like 0.1 mol% Pt, performed quite well if compared to analogue materials that can be found in literature (see Table 6) [21,37,38]. Indeed, Vaiano et al. reported photo-reforming of glucose under UVA irradiation achieving an H2 productivity of about 200 mmol/kgcat h when using a titania-based photo-catalyst loaded with 0.5 wt% of palladium. In our case, productivity using a similar but less loaded catalyst (i.e., 0.1 mol% Pd) allowed us to achieve a productivity fifteen times higher.

4. Conclusions

The major contribution to the photo-catalytic activity is due to the transition from the valence to the conduction band of the semiconductor, i.e., the direct band gap. The materials with the lowest BG, such as 1 wt% (Au2Ag8), 1 wt% (Au6Pt4), and 0.1 mol% Pt, reached the highest productivities in both photo-reduction reactions. For instance, they outperformed the benchmark P25 by, respectively, 295%, 215% and 70% in the CO2 photo-reduction, and by 722% and 622%, for photo-reforming process. Specifically, 9.5 mol HCOOH/h kgcat + 4.5 mol H2/h kgcat and 4.1 mol H2/h kgcat were achieved for CO2 photoreduction and glucose photo-reforming, respectively. However, the improved activity of the catalytic material cannot be entirely explained by the lower band gap; indeed, poor performances were encountered when either the surface area was low or the total pore volume substantially decreased after surface functionalization of the catalyst, like in the case of 1 wt% (Au2Pt8)/P25. Very low noble metals loading with high dispersion is sufficient for the scope of charge separation and to boost catalyst performance.
As a general observation, it is difficult to compare the performance of the catalysts prepared with that of other materials previously reported in the literature. The reaction conditions are very different (especially as regards the pressure in the reactor and the quantity of catalyst). Using low amounts of noble metal is surely beneficial for the economics of the reaction, since the cost of the photo-catalyst is significantly impacted by the nature and the loading of the metal. The challenge in prospective work on such types of materials is the characterization procedure, since extremely low metal loading and high NPs dispersion reduce the number of characterization techniques capable of giving structural insights into these catalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15082915/s1, Figure S1: Reflectance spectra; Figure S2: Average pore size distribution; Figure S3: Additional SEM and EDX images; Figure S4: Full XPS spectra.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B., F.C. and I.R.; methodology, S.B., I.R. and G.R.; validation, S.B. and I.R.; formal analysis, F.C.; investigation, F.C., S.H.-G. and C.V.; resources, I.R. and S.B.; data curation, F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C.; writing—review and editing, S.B. and I.R..; visualization, F.C.; supervision, S.B. and I.R.; project administration, S.B.; funding acquisition, S.B., G.R. and I.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CNRS in the frame of the International Emerging Action (IEA), grant number IEA00165.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge L. Prati and A. Villa of Università degli Studi di Milano for providing bi-metallic catalysts employed in this work. The physical-chemical characterizations were performed on the IS2M technical platforms. The authors are very grateful to L. Josien (SEM + EDX) for his contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fujishima, A.; Zhang, X.; Tryk, D.A. TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 515–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Padmanabhan, N.T.; Thomas, N.; Louis, J.; Mathew, D.T.; Ganguly, P.; John, H.; Pillai, S.C. Graphene coupled TiO2 photocatalysts for environmental applications: A review. Chemosphere 2021, 271, 129506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hoffmann, M.R.; Martin, S.T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D.W. Environmental Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Ohwaki, T.; Aoki, K.; Taga, Y. Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 2001, 293, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kumar, S.G.; Devi, L.G. Review on modified TiO2 photocatalysis under UV/visible light: Selected results and related mechanisms on interfacial charge carrier transfer dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 13211–13241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Indrakanti, V.P.; Kubicki, J.D.; Schobert, H.H. Photoinduced activation of CO2 on Ti-based heterogeneous catalysts: Current state, chemical physics-based insights and outlook. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 745–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Christoforidis, K.C.; Fornasiero, P. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Rift into the Future Energy Supply. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 1523–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gaya, U.I.; Abdullah, A.H. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: A review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2008, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N.T.; Pillai, S.C.; Seery, M.K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A.G.; Dunlop, P.S.M.; Hamilton, J.W.J.; Byrne, J.A.; O’Shea, K.; et al. A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 125, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bagheri, S.; Muhd Julkapli, N.; Bee Abd Hamid, S. Titanium dioxide as a catalyst support in heterogeneous catalysis. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 727496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Landmann, M.; Rauls, E.; Schmidt, W.G. The electronic structure and optical response of rutile, anatase and brookite TiO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2012, 24, 195503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Di Paola, A.; Bellardita, M.; Palmisano, L. Brookite, the least known TiO2 photocatalyst. Catalysts 2013, 3, 36–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Diffey, B.L. Solar ultraviolet radiation effects on biological systems. Phys. Med. Biol. 1991, 36, 299–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Humayun, M.; Raziq, F.; Khan, A.; Luo, W. Modification strategies of TiO2 for potential applications in photocatalysis: A critical review. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2018, 11, 86–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kavitha, R.; Kumar, S.G. Review on bimetallic-deposited TiO2: Preparation methods, charge carrier transfer pathways and photocatalytic applications. Chem. Pap. 2020, 74, 717–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zielińska-Jurek, A. Progress, challenge, and perspective of bimetallic TiO2-based photocatalysts. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 208920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tauster, S.J.; Fung, S.C.; Baker, R.T.K.; Horsley, J.A. Strong interactions in supported-metal catalysts. Science 1981, 211, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Leong, K.H.; Gan, B.L.; Ibrahim, S.; Saravanan, P. Synthesis of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) triggered Ag/TiO2 photocatalyst for degradation of endocrine disturbing compounds. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 319, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Ren, L.; Wang, D.; Ye, J. Metal nanoparticles induced photocatalysis. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2017, 4, 761–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Khore, S.K.; Kadam, S.R.; Naik, S.D.; Kale, B.B.; Sonawane, R.S. Solar light active plasmonic Au@TiO2 nanocomposite with superior photocatalytic performance for H2 production and pollutant degradation. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 10958–10968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rosario, A.V.; Pereira, E.C. The role of Pt addition on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles: The limit between doping and metallization. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 840–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hurum, D.C.; Agrios, A.G.; Gray, K.A.; Rajh, T.; Thurnauer, M.C. Explaining the enhanced photocatalytic activity of Degussa P25 mixed-phase TiO2 using EPR. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 4545–4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ayati, A.; Ahmadpour, A.; Bamoharram, F.F.; Tanhaei, B.; Mänttäri, M.; Sillanpää, M. A review on catalytic applications of Au/TiO2 nanoparticles in the removal of water pollutant. Chemosphere 2014, 107, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kowalska, E.; Janczarek, M.; Rosa, L.; Juodkazis, S.; Ohtani, B. Mono- and bi-metallic plasmonic photocatalysts for degradation of organic compounds under UV and visible light irradiation. Catal. Today 2014, 230, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gómez-Cortés, A.; Díaz, G.; Zanella, R.; Ramírez, H.; Santiago, P.; Saniger, J.M. Au−Ir/TiO2 prepared by deposition precipitation with urea: Improved activity and stability in co oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 9710–9720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gallo, A.; Marelli, M.; Psaro, R.; Gombac, V.; Montini, T.; Fornasiero, P.; Pievo, R.; Dal Santo, V. Bimetallic Au–Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts active under UV-A and simulated sunlight for H2 production from ethanol. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Teoh, W.Y.; Mädler, L.; Beydoun, D.; Pratsinis, S.E.; Amal, R. Direct (one-step) synthesis of TiO2 and Pt/TiO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic mineralisation of sucrose. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 5852–5861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Usubharatana, P.; McMartin, D.; Veawab, A.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P. Photocatalytic process for CO2 emission reduction from industrial flue gas streams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 2558–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Z. TiO2-based catalysts for photocatalytic reduction of aqueous oxyanions: State-of-the-art and future prospects. Environ. Int. 2020, 136, 105453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Indrakanti, V.P.; Kubicki, J.D.; Schobert, H.H. Photoinduced activation of CO2 on TiO2 surfaces: Quantum chemical modeling of CO2 adsorption on oxygen vacancies. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, L.; Li, Y. Understanding the reaction mechanism of photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O on TiO2-based photocatalysts: A review. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2014, 14, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tseng, I.H.; Wu, J.C.S.; Chou, H.Y. Effects of sol-gel procedures on the photocatalysis of Cu/TiO2 in CO2 photoreduction. J. Catal. 2004, 221, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Camarillo, R.; Tostón, S.; Martínez, F.; Jiménez, C.; Rincón, J. Enhancing the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 through engineering of catalysts with high pressure technology: Pd/TiO2 photocatalysts. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2017, 123, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiao, J.; Wei, Y.; Chi, K.; Zhao, Z.; Duan, A.; Liu, J.; Jiang, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Han, C.; et al. Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on TiO2 Photonic Crystals as Highly Active Photocatalyst for the Reduction of CO2 in the Presence of Water. Energy Technol. 2017, 5, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sescu, A.M.; Favier, L.; Lutic, D.; Soto-Donoso, N.; Ciobanu, G.; Harja, M. TiO2 doped with noble metals as an efficient solution for the photodegradation of hazardous organic water pollutants at ambient conditions. Water 2021, 13, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Daskalaki, V.M.; Kondarides, D.I. Efficient production of hydrogen by photo-induced reforming of glycerol at ambient conditions. Catal. Today 2009, 144, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vaiano, V.; Iervolino, G.; Sarno, G.; Sannino, D.; Rizzo, L.; Murcia Mesa, J.J.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Navío, J.A. Production simultanée de CH2 et H2 par réformage photocatalytique d’une solution aqueuse de glucose sur un catalyseur Pd-TiO2 sulfaté. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2015, 70, 891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. P25—Evonik. Available online: https://corporate.evonik.com/en/products/search-products/pages/product-details.aspx?productId=43469&countryId=5023 (accessed on 3 December 2021).
  40. Bahadori, E.; Tripodi, A.; Ramis, G.; Rossetti, I. Semi-Batch Photocatalytic Reduction of Nitrates: Role of Process Conditions and Co-Catalysts. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 4642–4652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bahadori, E.; Tripodi, A.; Villa, A.; Pirola, C.; Prati, L.; Ramis, G.; Dimitratos, N.; Wang, D.; Rossetti, I. High pressure CO2 photoreduction using Au/TiO2: Unravelling the effect of co-catalysts and of titania polymorphs. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 2253–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Makuła, P.; Pacia, M.; Macyk, W. How To Correctly Determine the Band Gap Energy of Modified Semiconductor Photocatalysts Based on UV-Vis Spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 6814–6817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kubelka, P.; Munk, F. Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farbanstriche. Zeitschrift für Tech. Phys. 1931, 12, 593–601. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tauc, J.; Grigorovici, R.; Vancu, A. Optical Properties and Electronic Structure of Amorphous Germanium. Phys. Status Solidi 1966, 15, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bahadori, E.; Ramis, G.; Zanardo, D.; Menegazzo, F.; Signoretto, M.; Gazzoli, D.; Pietrogiacomi, D.; Di Michele, A.; Rossetti, I. Photoreforming of glucose over CuO/TiO2. Catalysts 2020, 10, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ramis, G.; Bahadori, E.; Rossetti, I. Design of efficient photocatalytic processes for the production of hydrogen from biomass derived substrates. Int. J. Hydroen Energy 2021, 46, 12105–12116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Karkare, M.M. The Direct transition and not Indirect transition, is more favourable for Band Gap calculation of Anatase TiO2 nanoparticles. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2015, 6, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, J.; Zhou, P.; Liu, J.; Yu, J. New understanding of the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 20382–20386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reyes-Coronado, D.; Rodríguez-Gattorno, G.; Espinosa-Pesqueira, M.E.; Cab, C.; De Coss, R.; Oskam, G. Phase-pure TiO2 nanoparticles: Anatase, brookite and rutile. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 145605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Valencia, S.; Marín, J.M.; Restrepo, G. Study of the bandgap of synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticules using the sol-gel method and a hydrothermal treatment. Open Mater. Sci. J. 2010, 4, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sandoval, A.; Aguilar, A.; Louis, C.; Traverse, A.; Zanella, R. Bimetallic Au-Ag/TiO2 catalyst prepared by deposition-precipitation: High activity and stability in CO oxidation. J. Catal. 2011, 281, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Benz, D.; Felter, K.M.; Köser, J.; Thöming, J.; Mul, G.; Grozema, F.C.; Hintzen, H.T.; Kreutzer, M.T.; Van Ommen, J.R. Assessing the Role of Pt Clusters on TiO2 (P25) on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Acid Blue 9 and Rhodamine B. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 8269–8278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Cychosz, K.A.; Thommes, M. Progress in the Physisorption Characterization of Nanoporous Gas Storage Materials. Engineering 2018, 4, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Debeila, M.A.; Raphulu, M.C.; Mokoena, E.; Avalos, M.; Petranovskii, V.; Coville, N.J.; Scurrell, M.S. The effect of gold on the phase transitions of titania. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 396, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sdanghi, G.; Schaefer, S.; Maranzana, G.; Celzard, A.; Fierro, V. Application of the modified Dubinin-Astakhov equation for a better understanding of high-pressure hydrogen adsorption on activated carbons. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 25912–25926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Terzyk, A.P.; Gauden, P.A.; Kowalczyk, P. What kind of pore size distribution is assumed in the Dubinin-Astakhov adsorption isotherm equation? Carbon N. Y. 2002, 40, 2879–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Debeila, M.A.; Raphulu, M.C.; Mokoena, E.; Avalos, M.; Petranovskii, V.; Coville, N.J.; Scurrell, M.S. The influence of gold on the optical properties of sol-gel derived titania. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 396, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Du, X.; Huang, Y.; Pan, X.; Han, B.; Su, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Li, M.; Tang, H.; Li, G.; Qiao, B. Size-dependent strong metal-support interaction in TiO2 supported Au nanocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tasbihi, M.; Kočí, K.; Edelmannová, M.; Troppová, I.; Reli, M.; Schomäcker, R. Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts deposited on commercial support for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 366, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Briggs, D.; Seah, M.P. Practical Surface Analysis by Auger and x-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 1983; ISBN 047126279X. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tougaard, S. Quantitative analysis of the inelastic background in surface electron spectroscopy. Surf. Interface Anal. 1988, 11, 453–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Proctor, A.; Hercules, D.M. Inelastic Background and Peak Area Determination in x-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Esca). Appl. Spectrosc. 1984, 38, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Erdem, B.; Hunsicker, R.A.; Simmons, G.W.; David Sudol, E.; Dimonie, V.L.; El-Aasser, M.S. XPS and FTIR surface characterization of TiO2 particles used in polymer encapsulation. Langmuir 2001, 17, 2664–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kruse, N.; Chenakin, S. XPS characterization of Au/TiO2 catalysts: Binding energy assessment and irradiation effects. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 391, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Yu, F.; Wang, C.; Ma, H.; Song, M.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y. Revisiting Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts for thermally assisted photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 7000–7010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liu, J.; Ding, T.; Zhang, H.; Li, G.; Cai, J.; Zhao, D.; Tian, Y.; Xian, H.; Bai, X.; Li, X. Engineering surface defects and metal-support interactions on Pt/TiO2(B) nanobelts to boost the catalytic oxidation of CO. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 4934–4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Subramanian, V.; Wolf, E.E.; Kamat, P.V. Influence of metal/metal ion concentration on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2—Au composite nanoparticles. Langmuir 2003, 19, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dozzi, M.V.; Prati, L.; Canton, P.; Selli, E. Effects of gold nanoparticles deposition on the photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide under visible light. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 7171–7180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Scherrer, P. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Math. Klasse 1918, 2, 98–100. [Google Scholar]
  70. Bouzoubaa, A.; Markovits, A.; Calatayud, M.; Minot, C. Comparison of the reduction of metal oxide surfaces: TiO2-anatase, TiO2-rutile and SnO2-rutile. Surf. Sci. 2005, 583, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bahadori, E.; Tripodi, A.; Villa, A.; Pirola, C.; Prati, L.; Ramis, G.; Rossetti, I. High pressure photoreduction of CO2: Effect of catalyst formulation, hole scavenger addition and operating conditions. Catalysts 2018, 8, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Conte, F.; Villa, A.; Prati, L.; Pirola, C.; Ramis, G.; Rossetti, I. Effect of metal co-catalysts and operating conditions on the product distribution and the productivity of the CO2 photoreduction. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022, 61, 2963–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pellegrino, F.; Sordello, F.; Mino, L.; Minero, C.; Hodoroaba, V.D.; Martra, G.; Maurino, V. Formic Acid Photoreforming for Hydrogen Production on Shape-Controlled Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticles: Assessment of the Role of Fluorides, {101}/{001} Surfaces Ratio, and Platinization. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 6692–6697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kaneco, S.; Shimizu, Y.; Ohta, K.; Mizuno, T. Photocatalytic reduction of high pressure carbon dioxide using TiO2 powders with a positive hole scavenger. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1998, 115, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xie, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y. Photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO2 using heterogeneous catalysts with controlled nanostructures. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 35–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sanwald, K.E.; Berto, T.F.; Eisenreich, W.; Gutiérrez, O.Y.; Lercher, J.A. Catalytic routes and oxidation mechanisms in photoreforming of polyols. J. Catal. 2016, 344, 806–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Toe, C.Y.; Tsounis, C.; Zhang, J.; Masood, H.; Gunawan, D.; Scott, J.; Amal, R. Advancing photoreforming of organics: Highlights on photocatalyst and system designs for selective oxidation reactions. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 1140–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 02915 g001 550
Figure 1. DRS UV-Vis spectra of (a) mono-metallic and (c) bi-metallic photo-catalysts and respective Kubelka-Munk transformation (r = 1/2) plotted against the BG energy (b,d). The step at 565 nm is due to instrumental reasons.
Figure 1. DRS UV-Vis spectra of (a) mono-metallic and (c) bi-metallic photo-catalysts and respective Kubelka-Munk transformation (r = 1/2) plotted against the BG energy (b,d). The step at 565 nm is due to instrumental reasons.
Materials 15 02915 g001
Materials 15 02915 g002 550
Figure 2. Isothermal linear plot obtained from nitrogen sorption curve of (a) mono-metallic and (b) bi-metallic photo-catalysts.
Figure 2. Isothermal linear plot obtained from nitrogen sorption curve of (a) mono-metallic and (b) bi-metallic photo-catalysts.
Materials 15 02915 g002
Materials 15 02915 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) and (b) 0.1 mol% Au/P25, (c) 0.1 mol% Pt/P25 and (d) and (e) 1 wt% (Au6Pt4)/P25. (b) and (e) have been taken using backscatter detector (BED-C).
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) and (b) 0.1 mol% Au/P25, (c) 0.1 mol% Pt/P25 and (d) and (e) 1 wt% (Au6Pt4)/P25. (b) and (e) have been taken using backscatter detector (BED-C).
Materials 15 02915 g003
Materials 15 02915 g004 550
Figure 4. XPS spectra of selected photo−catalyst: (a) O1s P25; (b) Ti2p P25; (c) O1s 0.1 mol% Au; (d) Ti2p 0.1 mol% Au; (e) Au4f 0.1 mol% Au; (f) Au4f and Pt4f 1 wt% (Au8Pt2).
Figure 4. XPS spectra of selected photo−catalyst: (a) O1s P25; (b) Ti2p P25; (c) O1s 0.1 mol% Au; (d) Ti2p 0.1 mol% Au; (e) Au4f 0.1 mol% Au; (f) Au4f and Pt4f 1 wt% (Au8Pt2).
Materials 15 02915 g004
Materials 15 02915 g005 550
Figure 5. XRD spectra of bare P25 compared with (a) mono and (b) selected bi−metallic photo-catalysts. “A” stands for Anatase and “R” refers to Rutile.
Figure 5. XRD spectra of bare P25 compared with (a) mono and (b) selected bi−metallic photo-catalysts. “A” stands for Anatase and “R” refers to Rutile.
Materials 15 02915 g005
Materials 15 02915 g006 550
Figure 6. Productivity of HCOOH and H2 for (a) mono−metallic and (b) bi−metallic photo-catalysts from CO2 photo-reduction activity tests performed at 8 bar and pH = 14.
Figure 6. Productivity of HCOOH and H2 for (a) mono−metallic and (b) bi−metallic photo-catalysts from CO2 photo-reduction activity tests performed at 8 bar and pH = 14.
Materials 15 02915 g006
Materials 15 02915 g007 550
Figure 7. Hydrogen productivities through glucose photo−reforming achieved with 0.250 g/L of photo-catalyst, 5 g/L of glucose at pH = 6.5, 4 h test with medium pressure UV lamp. (a) mono-metallic and (b) bi-metallic photo-catalysts.
Figure 7. Hydrogen productivities through glucose photo−reforming achieved with 0.250 g/L of photo-catalyst, 5 g/L of glucose at pH = 6.5, 4 h test with medium pressure UV lamp. (a) mono-metallic and (b) bi-metallic photo-catalysts.
Materials 15 02915 g007
Table
Table 1. Band gap values (direct and indirect) of selected photo-catalyst obtained by reflectance measurements and Kubelka-Munk transformation.
Table 1. Band gap values (direct and indirect) of selected photo-catalyst obtained by reflectance measurements and Kubelka-Munk transformation.
Photo-CatalystDirect Band Gap-eVIndirect Band Gap-eV
P253.453.22
0.1 mol% Pd/P253.333.14
0.1 mol% Au/P253.203.14
0.1 mol% Pt/P253.213.18
0.1 mol% Ag/P253.213.10
1 wt% (Au8Pt2)/P253.223.19
1 wt% (Au6Pt4)/P253.213.22
1 wt% (Au2Pt8)/P253.203.19
1 wt% (Au8Ag2)/P253.223.24
1 wt% (Au2Ag8)/P253.213.21
Table
Table 2. Microstructural properties of the samples derived by N2 sorption isotherms at −196 °C.
Table 2. Microstructural properties of the samples derived by N2 sorption isotherms at −196 °C.
Photo-CatalystBET SSA–m2/gTotal Pore Volume–cm3/gt-Plot Micropore Volume–cm3/gBJH Adsorption Pore Width–nm
P25470.257/35
0.1 mol% Pd/P25570.511/39
0.1 mol% Au/P25380.394/32
0.1 mol% Pt/P25350.474/38
0.1 mol% Ag/P25530.4550.0003934
1 wt% (Au8Pt2)/P25520.480/42
1 wt% (Au6Pt4)/P25450.467/38
1 wt% (Au2Pt8)/P25330.296/36
1 wt% (Au8Ag2)/P25510.509/43
1 wt% (Au2Ag8)/P25410.5130.0031051
Table
Table 3. Theoretical composition vs. abundance calculated through XPS of selected photo-catalysts.
Table 3. Theoretical composition vs. abundance calculated through XPS of selected photo-catalysts.
Theoretical Bulk Metal Loading−mol%XPS Loading−mol%
Photo-CatalystAuPtAuPt
0.1 mol% Au/P250.1/0.143/
0.1 mol% Pt/P25/0.1/0.126
1 wt% (Au8Pt2)/P250.320.080.6720.089
1 wt% (Au6Pt4)/P250.240.160.5380.276
Table
Table 4. XRD analysis results of mono and bi-metallic photocatalysts.
Table 4. XRD analysis results of mono and bi-metallic photocatalysts.
Photo-CatalystAnatase/Rutile-%Crystallite Size
P2578/2215(A)/26(R)
0.1 mol% Au/P2578/2218(A)/28(R)
0.1 mol% Pt/P2577/2318(A)/28(R)
0.1 mol% Ag/P2570/3018(A)/28(R)
1 wt% (Au2Pt8)/P2573/2716(A)/25(R)
1 wt% (Au2Ag8)/P2576/2416(A)/24(R)
1 wt% (Au8Ag2)/P2573/2716(A)/22(R)
Table
Table 5. Performance in the CO2 photo-reduction of different photo-catalysts reported in literature.
Table 5. Performance in the CO2 photo-reduction of different photo-catalysts reported in literature.
Cat.[Cat.] mg/LLight SourceHSConditionsProducts mmol/kgcat hRef.
0.1 mol% Pt31UVA-157 W/m2Na2SO380 °C; 8 bar; pH 14HCOOH-9500
H2-4500		This work
1 wt% (Au2Ag8)31UVA-157 W/m2Na2SO380 °C; 8 bar; pH 14HCOOH-5500
H2-4400		This work
2 wt% Au5000Xe–620 W/m2i-PrOHrt; 28 barCH4-0.5
HCOOH-<0.1		[74]
1.5 wt% Pt287UVC-8 WnonertCH4-1.25
H2-1
CO-0.58		[59]
2 wt% Cu100UVCnonert; pH 13CH3OH-23[33]
3 wt% CuO1000UVC–6 Wnonert; pH 13CH3OH-230
HCOOH-0.5
HCHO-0.2		[75]
Table
Table 6. Performance in the glucose photo-reforming of different photo-catalysts reported in literature.
Table 6. Performance in the glucose photo-reforming of different photo-catalysts reported in literature.
Cat.[Cat.] mg/LLight SourceHSConditionsProducts mmol/kgcat hRef.
0.1 mol% Pt250UVA-157 W/m2glucose80 °C; 5 bar; pH 6.5H2-3500This work
1 wt% (Au6Pt4)250UVA-157 W/m2glucose80 °C; 5 bar; pH 6.5H2-4100This work
0.5 wt% Pd500UVA–10 Wglucosert; 1 barH2-208[38]
0.2 wt% Au600Sunlight–145,000 luxCH3OHN/DH2-400[21]
0.5 wt% Au+0.5 wt% Pt2000UVA–125 WCH3CH2OHN/DH2-7500[27]
0.5 wt% Pt1300Xe–450 Wglycerol40 °C; pH 7H2-375[37]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Conte, F.; Rossetti, I.; Ramis, G.; Vaulot, C.; Hajjar-Garreau, S.; Bennici, S. Low Metal Loading (Au, Ag, Pt, Pd) Photo-Catalysts Supported on TiO2 for Renewable Processes. Materials 2022, 15, 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082915

AMA Style

Conte F, Rossetti I, Ramis G, Vaulot C, Hajjar-Garreau S, Bennici S. Low Metal Loading (Au, Ag, Pt, Pd) Photo-Catalysts Supported on TiO2 for Renewable Processes. Materials. 2022; 15(8):2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082915

Chicago/Turabian Style

Conte, Francesco, Ilenia Rossetti, Gianguido Ramis, Cyril Vaulot, Samar Hajjar-Garreau, and Simona Bennici. 2022. "Low Metal Loading (Au, Ag, Pt, Pd) Photo-Catalysts Supported on TiO2 for Renewable Processes" Materials 15, no. 8: 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082915

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop