Next Article in Journal
Adjunctive Application of Hyaluronic Acid in Combination with a Sodium Hypochlorite Gel for Non-Surgical Treatment of Residual Pockets Reduces the Need for Periodontal Surgery—Retrospective Analysis of a Clinical Case Series
Previous Article in Journal
Properties of Al2O3/Ti/Ni Composite Obtained by Slip Casting with Different Metal Phase Content
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Antifouling Polysulfone Membranes by Synergistic Modification with Two Different Additives in Casting Solution and Coagulation Bath: Synperonic F108 and Polyacrylic Acid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 19
10.3390/ma15196515
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Performance pH Sensor Electrodes Based on a Hexagonal Pt Nanoparticle Array-Coated Nanoporous Alumina Membrane

by
Abeer S. Altowyan
1,
Mohamed Shaban
2,3,*,
Asmaa Gamel
2,
Ahmed Gamal
2,
Mona Ali
2 and
Mohamed Rabia
2,4
1
Department of Physics, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
2
Nanophotonics and Applications (NPA) Lab, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt
3
Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, P.O. Box 170, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
4
Nanomaterials Science Research Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(19), 6515; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196515
Submission received: 7 July 2022 / Revised: 14 August 2022 / Accepted: 15 August 2022 / Published: 20 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Modification of Membrane Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Porous anodic alumina membranes coated with Pt nanoparticles (PAAM/Pt) have been employed as pH sensor electrodes for H+ ion detection. The PAAM was designed using a two-step anodization process. Pt nanoparticles were then sputtered onto the membrane at different deposition times. The membrane’s morphological, chemical, and optical characteristics were carefully assessed following the fabrication stage using a variety of analytical techniques. The potential of the PAAM/Pt sensor electrode was investigated by measuring the potential using a simple potentiometric method. The effects of depositing Pt nanoparticles for 3–7 min on sensor electrode sensitivity were examined. The optimal potentiometric Nernstian response slope for the PAAM/Pt sensor electrode with 5 min Pt sputter coating is 56.31 mV/decade in the pH range of 3.0 to 10 at 293 K. Additionally, the PAAM/Pt sensor electrode’s stability and selectivity in various ions solutions were examined. The sensor electrode had a lifetime of more than six weeks and was kept in a normal air environment.

1. Introduction

Researchers and scientists are interested in ordered porous structures because they have many fascinating characteristics [1,2,3]. The surface porosity, particularly the order surface, has a high surface that increases the interaction between the active sites and the electrolyte [4,5]. Fabricating nanostructures with good alignment and uniform size to actualize most of the proposed applications by the conventional lithographic process was even more difficult [6]. Various experiments have been conducted to create porous materials using naturally occurring materials or self-organizing materials such as carbonates [7,8,9,10,11]. Porous anodic alumina membranes (PAAMs), which are incredibly porous and have specified shapes and sizes, are one sort of ordered porous structure [12,13]. They may be modified to create free-standing membranes and have controlled pore density and periodicity [14]. These membranes are typical self-ordered nanoporous materials manufactured by Al with remarkable purity using a two-step anodization process. They are shaped in different forms with cylindrical holes in the centre. The PAAMs attracted much interest as a method for making nanowires, nanotubes, nanorings, and nanocones [1,2].
There have been many different types of biosensors discovered during recent decays, with and without nanoparticles, that operate according to a variety of hypotheses (changes in magnetic properties, refractive index, etc.) [15,16]. H+ ion detection was carried out using glass electrodes, metal oxide film, fluorescent pH, and fibre optical pH sensors [17,18]. Although these sensors offer numerous benefits, their use is constrained by a number of drawbacks [19,20]. pH determination is an important process for chemical, medical, and industrial applications. Only a few of the crucial aspects of life that depend on pH sensing include drinking water, food, biological contamination, and environmental contamination [21,22]. Some pH-sensing techniques, such as the glass electrode, are expensive and can only be used with very acidic and fluorine solutions. In addition, certain techniques—such as using metal oxides—are dangerous. Additionally, fluorescent pH sensors are only used for biological detections. These drawbacks encourage researchers to create new pH detecting techniques that are both highly efficient and affordable [23,24]. Recent research on various materials has been carried out to address the aforementioned problems. In prior studies, we used poly m-toluidine to effectively identify H+ ions in the pH range of 6–10 [25]. To determine pH, other investigations utilized a different type of polymer-coated with Au-Zn [26]. Additionally, the pH range of 7.6 to 8.2 was well-detected in ocean water by spot fluorescence. Moreover, limited studies have been focused on the use of nanoporous structures as sensitive elements for pH [27,28,29,30]. Ibupoto et al. developed NiO nanoporous structure on Au/glass substrate with a sensitivity of −43.74 ± 0.80 mV/pH and a quick response time of <10 s to test various phosphate buffered saline solutions in the pH range of 2–12 [27]. According to McMurray et al., a porous RuO2-glass composite has been used as a pH sensor and exhibits near-Nernstian potential with a response time of ~90 s and a maximum hysteresis of 30 mV in the pH range of 2–12 [28]. In 2020, Manjakkal et al. highlighted the developments and prospects for electrochemical pH sensors based on metal oxide nanostructures [29]. Recently, plasmonic nanostructures have been applied to improve pH-sensing parameters [31,32]. Chu et al. used Pt nanoparticles to enhance the pH-sensing characteristics of ZnO nanorods [32]. Therefore, it is crucial to design a pH-sensitive element based on arrayed nanoporous structures, such as PAAM coated with plasmonic nanostructure, and to study how it responds to various pH levels.
In this study, a two-step anodization procedure and the sputter coating technique were used to create Pt/PAAM sensors of different Pt sputtering times, and they were then characterized by using various analytical instruments. The influence of the Pt coating time on the sensitivity and selectivity of the PAAM/Pt sensor to detect the proton ion was evaluated. Additionally, the PAAM/Pt sensor’s lifetime and stability were investigated.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Materials

From Sigma Aldrich in Germany, high purity Al foils (99.999%), high purity sulfuric, phosphoric, and oxalic acids were purchased. From Biochem in Egypt, chromium oxide CrO3 (99.9%) was acquired. The m-toluidine, NaOH, KCl, HCl, and citric acid (C6H8O7) were purchased from ElNaser co., Egypt. Na2B2O7 and Na2HPO4 were obtained from United co. Egypt. Buffer solutions were prepared in our lab using a certain percentage of the reagent, in which buffer solutions of pH 1 and pH 2 were prepared from KCl and HCl, and buffer solutions of pH 3 to pH 8 were prepared from Na2HPO4 and C8H8O7. Moreover, buffer solutions of pH 9 and pH 10 were prepared from Na2B2O7.

2.2. Fabrication and Characterization of the PAAM/Pt Sensor Electrode

Nanoporous Anodic Alumina Membranes (PAAMs) were made using a two-step anodization technique [2]. High purity Al foils (99.999%, 0.25 mm thickness, Merck, UK) were employed as the starting material. These Al foils were cleaned for 10 min in deionized water at 25 °C after being degreased in 99.9% acetone for 5 min and 99.9% methanol for 5 min at 150 °C. The foil was electropolished for three minutes at 50 °C with steady stirring in a solution of H3PO4:H2SO4:H2O (1:1:1). The clean Al foil was first anodized in a 0.3 M C2H2O4 solution at 50 V and 7 °C for 13 h. After first being anodized, the alumina membrane was submerged for three hours at room temperature in a solution of H2O, H3PO4, and CrO3 (100 mL:10 mL:1 g). The second anodization took place afterwards for 5 min under the same conditions as the first anodization. The created PAAM was submerged in a pore-widening solution (6%wt phosphoric solution) for 45 min at room temperature (25 °C).
At a pressure of 2 torr, a current of 6 mA, and a separation of 8 cm from the Pt target, Pt was deposited on the top surface of PAAM using a fairly simple sputter-coating process. The deposition time of Pt varied from 0 to 7 min.
Using an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX) and a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; models: ZEISS SUPRA 55 VP and ZEISS LEO, Gemini Column), the morphologies and constituents of the synthesized PAAM and PAAM/Pt samples were identified. The gathered samples’ reflection spectra were measured from 250 to 2500 nm using a UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (model: LAMBDA 950, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). A two-electrode cell was used for sensing measurements, with the synthesized PAAM/Pt acting as the working electrode in the presence of the saturated calomel electrode as a reference electrode. The measurements were made at 25 °C using a multimeter (UT71A, Uni-Trend Technology, Dongguan, China). By using a number of buffer solutions with pH ranging from 1 to 12, the effects of depositing Pt nanoparticles for 3 to 7 min on sensor electrode sensitivity were evaluated. In addition, the lifetime and response time were examined.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of PAAM and PAAM/Pt

To investigate the effect of Pt sputtering time on the morphology of the PAAM, a series of identical PAAMs (pore-widened of 45 min) was coated with Pt nanoparticles for 0, 3, 5, and 7 min (Figure 1a–d), and this coating process carried out using sputter device at low-vacuum conditions. The PAAM after widening has a pore diameter of 56 nm and an inter-pore distance of 125 nm. The PAAM has a hexagonal shape with high-pore ordering with a pore density of 1.01 × 1010 cm−2 and porosity of 18%. A cross-section image of PAAM without coating is shown in the inset of Figure 1a. In addition, the PAAM has six active regions (effective regions) around each pore, and this provides a high surface area, as we illustrated in our previous study [33].
The surface of PAAM is fully coated with Pt, as shown in the FE-SEM images of Figure 1b. The pore diameter after 3 min coating is reduced to 53 ± 3 nm. After 5 min of coating (Figure 1c), the thickness of the Pt layer increases and selectively grows over the inner wall at the hexagonal boundaries between the PAAM cells, which consist of high-purity alumina. The pore diameter after 5 min coating is reduced to 51 ± 2 nm. The Pt growth increased around the active sites, which serve as seeds for this growth, with the appearance of sub-gaps when the deposition time increased to 7 min (Figure 1d). The top and oblique blue insets of Figure 1d show the hexagonal array of Pt nanodiscs around each nanopore. The pore diameter after 7 min coating is reduced to 49 ± 1.0 nm, and the diameter of the Pt discs is 27.5 ± 1.5 nm. The presented morphologies are expected to be very important for sensing applications because they can support the chemical and electromagnetic enhancement of the detected signals. Until now, many reports have been published for the sensing applications of Au/PAAM and Ag/PAAM nanostructures [34], but the pH sensing application of the presented morphologies in Figure 1b–d has not been reported to the best of our knowledge. The FE-SEM images in Figure 1e,f show cross-sectional and oblique view images of the coated membranes to confirm the entrance of Pt in PAAM’s pores, as the porous support was used to increase the surface area and improve sensing parameters.
Pt depositions on the PAAM against sputtering time were qualitatively evaluated using an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX). Figure 2a,b show the EDX spectra of Pt/PAAM samples coated with Pt for 3 and 7 min. This figure displays the Al, O, and Pt signals. The quantitative analysis showed that the Pt mass% significantly increased from 3.1% to 16.1% when the sputtering period changed from 3 to 7 min. Our EDX results confirmed that the deposited Pt nanostructures had excellent purity because of the high degree of un-reactivity of Pt.
Optical reflectance analyses for the PAAM and PAAM/Pt (at different Pt coating times) are revealed in Figure 3a. The reflectance spectra are about 70–100% after 400 nm, in which the scattering and scattering coefficient are very small after 400 nm. The observed high peaks and dips caused by the reflectance spectra’s constructive and destructive interferences with the reflected waves constitute evidence of the PAAM’s well-built structure. When wavelengths increased, the contrast was lower and the peak’s width was larger. The PAAM/Pt reflectance spectra exhibit stronger and sharper fringes that shift to shorter wavelengths, just as the PAAM spectra. When Pt deposition duration is prolonged from 0 to 7 min, peak interference contrasts increase and reflectivity decreases. Figure 3b shows the exponential connection between the Pt deposition time and dip position, with an increasing blue shift as the Pt deposition time increases. In addition, the wavelengths and the separation between dips, Δλ, become smaller as deposition time increases. Figure 3c illustrates the link between deposition time and dip reflectance, with dips I and IV exhibiting a linear drop and dips II and III exhibiting a nonlinear behaviour. The Maxwell–Garnet medium approximation shows that dielectric constants and pore width vary with deposition time [2,35]. At 3 min deposition time, interference dip III is noticeably stronger than the others. In combination with the interference fringe at 846 nm, this may indicate the existence of a localized Pt surface plasmon [36,37]. By increasing the deposition time, the surface plasmon is blue-shifted, as indicated in Figure 3c.

3.2. Sensing Properties

Different buffer solutions with pH ranges between 3.0 and 10 at 25 °C were used to study the calibration curves of the PAAM coated with various Pt nanoparticle thicknesses as a function of coating time. In addition, four distinct solutions of pH 7 are used to study the sensor’s selectivity for H+ ions, and each solution’s relative standard deviation is calculated. Finally, the sensor electrode lifetime is investigated by utilizing the same calibration measurement behaviour over a buffer of pH 3.0–10 for several weeks. The calibration curves for the sensor are based on the Nernst Equations (1) and (2), where n represents oxidation electrons, Q represents H+ ions concentrations, T represents temperature in kelvin, R represents a universal gas constant, and F represents the Faraday constant, with RT/F = 0.0591 at 25 °C [36,37,38,39].
E = E o − R T n F ln Q
E = E o + 0.0591   pH

3.2.1. Sensitivity of PAAM Sensor to H+ Ions under the Effect of Different Pt Film Thicknesses

The sensitivity (potentiometric response slopes) of PAAM and PAAM/Pt to H+ ions is studied using the simple potentiometric method based on Equation (2) [10,11,40,41]. Table 1 summarizes the information collected from Figure 4a,b, which display the potentiometric response slopes (buffer 3 to 10) for PAAM and PAAM/Pt sensor electrodes with various Pt thicknesses under study. The relationship between pH and the potentiometric slope for the PAAM is an exponential curve. Therefore, the potentiometric response slope of the PMMA as a pH sensor cannot be determined using Nernstian behaviour. This implies that the PAAM is useless as a standalone pH sensor. At pH values ≥ 7, it seems that the Al/PAAM/liquid can act as a semiconductor junction, and the band-gap barrier potential can be overcome. The noble Pt plates have been used to improve the sensitivity of PAAM to H+ ions.
The potentiometric response slope values for the PAAM/Pt sensors vary depending on the Pt film thicknesses as a function of the Pt sputter-coating duration, which ranges from 3 to 7 min. The potentiometric response slope increases from 49.56 to 56.31 mV/decade when the Pt sputter-coating time extended to 5 min, but when the Pt time coating increased to 7 min, the slope decreases to 54.47 mV/decade. This shows that the generated E value for the sensor with a 5 min Pt coating time and the change in H+ concentrations are more consistent with the Newtonian theory (Equation (2)). From this sensor, the experimental slope of 56.31 mV/decade is closer to the theoretical value of 59.1 mV/decade (Equation (2)). However, Pt coating with times at 3 or 7 min is less close to the theoretical Nernstian value.
The change in the potentiometric response slope is ascribed to the change in the sensitivity of the PAAM/Pt sensor electrode to proton ions that depends on Pt film thicknesses [42,43]. From Figure 4 and Table 1, the optimum potentiometric response slope is for the sensor with a Pt film of 5 min sputtering time. This PAAM/Pt sensor electrode can function with good behaviour in weak acid or base conditions with a good pH range (3–10). In addition, the detection limit (DL) is determined for the PAAM/Pt sensor under different Pt coating, in which the DL values are 11.77, 11.47, and 11.42 for Pt coatings of 3, 5, and 7 min, respectively. These values are calculated by extrapolating the data line until the intercept with the X-axis [44,45]. The average calibration curve points (hysteresis) are represented in Figure 4c. The pH 7 and pH 8 have potential values that are closer together. This suggests that these pH levels are ideal for the sensor. At pH 7 and 8, the standard deviation values are typically around 1.5%.

3.2.2. PAAM/Pt Sensor Electrode Selectivity

The selectivity of the PAAM/Pt sensor electrode to proton ions is studied in different ions solutions (H+, Na+, K+, and Mg2+) of the same concentrations at 293 K [46,47,48,49,50]. From the different solutions, the sensor potential is calculated for each one and then compared with the main H+ ion value (distilled H2O) of pH 7. The results in Table 2 show an average recovery of 93.8% with a total Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) of 4.3%. Moreover, with the presence of other interfering ions, these results confirm the utility of the proposed PAAM/Pt sensor electrode for H+ ion detection.

3.2.3. PAAM/Pt Sensor Electrode Stability

Every three days, the PAAM/Pt sensor’s potentiometric response slope is tested in buffer solutions with a pH range of 3.0 to 10, as shown in Figure 5. During measurements, the prepared sensor is reintroduced into the buffer solution after being kept in ambient air. The sensor electrode is thoroughly dried at a temperature of around 40 °C after measurement processes and then cleaned with deionized water for storage. All the data obtained from Figure 5 are listed in Table 3. The sensor’s potentiometric response slope over the six weeks matches the Nernstain slope with a little change from 56.31 to 49.47 mV/decade between the first and sixth weeks. Moreover, the sensor electrode has potentiometric response slopes of 51.2 and 44.02 mV/decade in the first and sixth weeks, respectively, with buffer solutions of pH changes from 3 to 10. In addition, the sensor response range decreases from 3–9 in the fifth week to 4–9 in the sixth week. After that, there is more change in the potentiometric slope of the Nernstian value due to some Pt etching from PAAM’s surface [51,52].

3.2.4. Response Time and Reproducibility

The response time is the time a sensor needs to reach 90% of its final potential value, in which there is contact between the sensor and ions [53,54,55,56]. Figure 6a shows the relationship between the PAAM/Pt response time and the Pt coating time (3–7 min). For PAAM coated with Pt, the response times are 3, 1, and 1 s for deposition durations of 3, 5, and 7 min, respectively. As the Pt coating becomes thicker, the reaction time slows down. This behaviour highlights how crucial a Pt coating is for enhancing a sensor electrode’s sensitivity and for enabling accurate H+ ion detection. In addition to this, a PAAM/Pt (5 min coating) reproducibility study was carried out and mentioned in Figure 6b for buffer solutions of pH 3 to pH 10.
The calculated different pH parameters are calculated and mentioned in Table 4 for the sensor. According to Figure 6 and Table 4, the potentiometric response slope with cycles (repeating) shows little variations, with values changing from 56.31 to 55 mV/decade from cycle 1 to cycle 3, respectively. Additionally, Figure 6c mentions the sensor electrode’s performance for 3 min. With a standard deviation of 1.01% and a relative standard deviation of 0.45%, the sensor has high operating time stability for three minutes. Additionally, Figure 6d mentions the reproducible experiments and error bars to support the excellent reproducibility studies for the sensor. Finally, a comparison study of the pH-sensing parameters for the PAAM/Pt sensor electrode with previously reported values for other materials is mentioned in Table 5. From this table, the newly prepared sensor has more sensing properties than our previous sensor based on Au/poly(m-toluidine), in which the new prepared sensor works in a pH response range of 3–10 with a Nernstian response slope of 56.31 mV/decade [25]. Moreover, from the table, other sensing studies have many drawbacks in terms of pH response ranges or Nernstian behaviour [19,20,57,58,59,60]. As a result, the newly produced sensor may be used in industrial H+ detection processes.

4. Conclusions

A PAAM/Pt sensor electrode was constructed using the fundamental potentiometric method to find H+ ions in aqueous solutions. The sensor was made using a two-step anodization process and the PAAM surface was coated with Pt nanoparticles using a sputtering technique. Six active dots served as a seed for Pt growth on the PAAM surface surrounding the PAAM pore in the optical and SEM experiments that showed the effects of Pt on the enhancement of the reflectance and active sites for PAAM. The average reflectivity decreases and the peak contrast increases with longer Pt deposition durations and a blue shift in reflective dip areas because the formed Pt nanostructures coincide with surface plasmon resonance. By using the detection process, many parameters were studied: the coating time of the Pt on PAAM, and the selectivity and stability of the PAAM/Pt sensor. The optimal coating Pt time was 5 min, with a Nernstian slope in the buffer range of 3 to 10 of 56.31 mV/decade. Additionally, the selectivity under examination had an RSD of 4.3%. The sensor’s lifetime was around six weeks. This study merely highlights the lab-scale usability of the suggested sensor. Future work will focus on re-imaging the sensor to determine whether or not the Pt or PAAM substrate was affected by low pH solutions. Several sensor-restoration approaches and sensor topologies will be described to enhance the Nernstian slope and durability of the sensor for industrial real applications. Moreover, our future study will seek to focus on the real-world applications of the optimized sensor in food processing, health monitoring, agricultural, and water quality monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and M.R.; methodology, M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal), M.A. and M.R.; validation, M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal), A.S.A. and M.R.; formal analysis, M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal), A.S.A. and M.R.; investigation, M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal), A.S.A. and M.R.; resources, A.S.A., M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal), A.S.A. and M.R.; data curation, M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal) and M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal) and M.R.; writing—review and editing, M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal), A.S.A. and M.R.; visualization, A.S.A., M.S., A.G. (Asmaa Gamel), A.G. (Ahmed Gamal), A.S.A. and M.R.; project administration, A.S.A.; funding acquisition, A.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R16), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R16), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rabia, M.; Mohamed, S.H.; Zhao, H.; Shaban, M.; Lei, Y.; Ahmed, A.M. TiO2/TiOxNY hollow mushrooms-like nanocomposite photoanode for hydrogen electrogeneration. J. Porous Mater. 2020, 27, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shaban, M.; Hamdy, H.; Shahin, F.; Ryu, S.W. Strong surface plasmon resonance of ordered gold nanorod array fabricated in porous anodic alumina template. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 3034–3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yanagishita, T.; Kato, K.; Shirano, N.; Masuda, H. Preparation of Ideally Ordered Anodic Porous Alumina by Prepatterning Process Using a Flexible Mold. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2022, 11, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bennett, T.D.; Coudert, F.-X.; James, S.L.; Cooper, A.I. The changing state of porous materials. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1179–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, Y.; Rogge, S.M.J.; Lamaire, A.; Vandenbrande, S.; Wieme, J.; Siviour, C.R.; van Speybroeck, V.; Tan, J.-C. High-rate nanofluidic energy absorption in porous zeolitic frameworks. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saharil, F.; Forsberg, F.; Liu, Y.; Bettotti, P.; Kumar, N.; Niklaus, F.; Haraldsson, T.; van der Wijngaart, W.; Gylfason, K.B. Dry adhesive bonding of nanoporous inorganic membranes to microfluidic devices using the OSTE(+) dual-cure polymer. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2013, 23, 025021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shaban, M.; Rabia, M.; Fathallah, W.; El-Mawgoud, N.A.; Mahmoud, A.; Hussien, H.; Said, O. Preparation and Characterization of Polyaniline and Ag/Polyaniline Composite Nanoporous Particles and Their Antimicrobial Activities. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shaban, M.; Ali, S.; Rabia, M. Design and application of nanoporous graphene oxide film for CO2, H2, and C2H2 gases sensing. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 4510–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Wang, D.; Chen, J.; Wu, C.; Shen, J.; Li, Y.; He, G.; Li, Y. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; Volume 75, pp. 771–781. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lai, C.W. Surface Morphology and Growth of Anodic Titania Nanotubes Films: Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Studies. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 820764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shaban, M.; Ali, M.; Abdel-Hady, K.; Hamdy, H. Al2O3 and Sn/Al2O3 nanowires: Fabrication and characterisation. Micro Nano Lett. 2015, 10, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sousa, C.T.; Leitao, D.C.; Proenca, M.P.; Ventura, J.; Pereira, A.M.; Araujo, J.P. Nanoporous alumina as templates for multifunctional applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2014, 1, 031102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Safronov, A.P.; Stadler, B.J.H.; Um, J.; Kouhpanji, M.R.Z.; Masa, J.A.; Galyas, A.G.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Polyacrylamide Ferrogels with Ni Nanowires. Materials 2019, 12, 2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tantawi, K.H.; Berdiev, B.; Cerro, R.; Williams, J.D. Porous silicon membrane for investigation of transmembrane proteins. Superlattices Microstruct. 2013, 58, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kouhpanji, M.R.Z.; Stadler, B.J.H. A Guideline for Effectively Synthesizing and Characterizing Magnetic Nanoparticles for Advancing Nanobiotechnology: A Review. Sensors 2020, 20, 2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. García-Arribas, A.; Martínez, F.; Fernández, E.; Ozaeta, I.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Svalov, A.V.; Berganzo, J.; Barandiaran, J.M. GMI detection of magnetic-particle concentration in continuous flow. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2011, 172, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fatimah, S.; Rahman, A.; Yusof, N.A.; Hashim, U.; Nuzaihan, M.; Nor, M. Design and Fabrication of Silicon Nanowire based Sensor. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 10946–10960. [Google Scholar]
  18. Werner, J.; Belz, M.; Klein, K.-F.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V. Fiber optic sensor designs and luminescence-based methods for the detection of oxygen and pH measurement. Measurement 2021, 178, 109323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahmed, N.M.; Sabah, F.A.; Al-Hardan, N.H.; Almessiere, M.A.; Mohammad, S.M.; Foong Lim, W.; Jumaah, M.; Islam, A.K.M.S.; Hassan, Z.; Quah, H.J.; et al. Development of EGFET-based ITO pH sensors using epoxy free membrane. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2021, 36, 045027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rasheed, H.S.; Ahmed, N.M.; Matjafri, M.Z.; Al-Hardan, N.H.; Almessiere, M.A.; Sabah, F.A.; Al-Hazeem, N.Z. Multilayer ZnO/Pd/ZnO Structure as Sensing Membrane for Extended-Gate Field-Effect Transistor (EGFET) with High pH Sensitivity. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 5901–5908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmadi, H.; Keshipour, S.; Ahour, F. New water-soluble colorimetric pH and metal ione sensor based on graphene quantum dot modified with alizarine red S. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, X.; Dong, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhang, G.; Li, J.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, W.; Liu, H. Using Cu2+ ions as a detection material to verify the synthesis mechanism of Au nanoclusters mediated by wool keratin and silk fibroin resilience network. Text. Res. J. 2022, 92, 2150–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Flores, J.M.; Maningas, M.B.B.; Sevilla, F.B. Micro-Probe Potentiometric pH Sensor for Detection of Amplification in the LAMP Assay for White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) in Shrimps. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 9289–9295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boswell, P.G.; Szíjjártó, C.; Jurisch, M.; Gladysz, J.A.; Rábai, J.; Bühlmann, P. Fluorophilic ionophores for potentiometric pH determinations with fluorous membranes of exceptional selectivity. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 2084–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sayyah, S.M.; Shaban, M.; Rabia, M. m-Toluidine Polymer Film Coated Platinum Electrode as a pH Sensor by Potentiometric Methods. Sens. Lett. 2015, 13, 961–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, D.M.; Cho, S.J.; Cho, C.H.; Kim, K.B.; Kim, M.Y.; Shim, Y.B. Disposable all-solid-state pH and glucose sensors based on conductive polymer covered hierarchical AuZn oxide. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ibupoto, Z.H.; Khun, K.; Willander, M. Development of a pH sensor using nanoporous nanostructures of NiO. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 6699–6703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, J.; Kwak, T.J.; Zhang, X.; McClain, R.; Chang, W.-J.; Gunasekaran, S. Digital pH test strips for in-field pH monitoring using iridium oxide-reduced graphene oxide hybrid thin films. ACS Sens. 2016, 1, 1235–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Manjakkal, L.; Szwagierczak, D.; Dahiy, R. Metal oxides based electrochemical pH sensors: Current progress and future perspectives. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 109, 100635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rao, T.; Li, J.; Cai, W.; Wu, M.; Jiang, J.; Yang, P.; Zhou, Y.; Liao, W. Fabrication of a Mesoporous Multimetallic Oxide-based Ion-Sensitive Field Effect Transistor for pH Sensing. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 32297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Young, S.-J.; Chu, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-L. Enhancing pH Sensors Performance of ZnO Nanorods With Au Nanoparticles Adsorption. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 13068–13073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chu, Y.-L.; Young, S.-J.; Dai, H.-R.; Lee, Y.-M.; Khosla, A.; Chu, T.-T.; Ji, L.-W. Improved pH-Sensing Characteristics by Pt Nanoparticle-Decorated ZnO Nanostructures. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 067001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Serry, M.; Gamal, A.; Shaban, M.; Sharaf, A.H. High sensitivity optochemical and electrochemical metal ion sensor. Micro Nano Lett. 2013, 8, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shaban, M.; Hady, A.G.A.; Serry, M. A new sensor for heavy metals detection in aqueous media. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shaban, M.; Hamdy, H.; Shahin, F.; Ryu, S.W. Optical properties of porous anodic alumina membrane uniformly decorated with ultra-thin porous gold nanoparticles arrays. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 11, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shaban, M. Effect of pore thickness and the state of polarization on the optical properties of hexagonal nanoarray of Au/nanoporous anodic alumina membrane. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 347486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, G.; Shi, C.; Zhao, N.; Du, X. Synthesis and characterization of Ag nanoparticles assembled in ordered array pores of porous anodic alumina by chemical deposition. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 3795–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hopper, A.; Beswick-Jones, H.; Brown, A.M. The Nernst equation: Using physico-chemical laws to steer novel experimental design. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2022, 46, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ciribelli, B.N.; Colmati, F.; de Souza, E.C. Nernst equation applied to electrochemical systems and centenary of his Nobel Prize in chemistry. Int. J. Innov. Educ. Res. 2020, 8, 670–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sayyah, E.S.M.; Shaban, M.; Rabia, M. A sensor of m-cresol nanopolymer/Pt-electrode film for detection of lead ions by potentiometric methods. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 1296–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sayyah, S.M.; Shaban, M.; Rabia, M. Electropolymerization of m-Toluidin on Platinum Electrode from Aqueous Acidic Solution and Character of the Obtained Polymer. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhuiykov, S. Solid-state sensors monitoring parameters of water quality for the next generation of wireless sensor networks. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 161, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zeng, X.Q.; Wang, Y.L.; Deng, H.; Latimer, M.L.; Xiao, Z.L.; Pearson, J.; Xu, T.; Wang, H.H.; Welp, U.; Crabtree, G.W.; et al. Networks of ultrasmall Pd/Cr nanowires as high performance hydrogen sensors. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 7443–7452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sayyah, S.M.; Shaban, M.; Rabia, M. A sensor of m-toluidine/m-cresol polymer film for detection of lead ions by potentiometric methods. Sens. Lett. 2016, 14, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sayyah, S.M.; Shaban, M.; Rabia, M. A High-Sensitivity Potentiometric Mercuric Ion Sensor Based on m-Toluidine Films. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Avolio, R.; Grozdanov, A.; Avella, M.; Barton, J.; Cocca, M.; de Falco, F.; Dimitrov, A.T.; Errico, M.E.; Fanjul-Bolado, P.; Gentile, G.; et al. Review of pH sensing materials from macro- to nano-scale: Recent developments and examples of seawater applications. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 979–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shi, E.; Zhang, W.; Yang, B. Effect of Tb(III) on the unfolding of ciliate Euplotes octocarinatus centrin induced by guanidine hydrochloride. J. Rare Earths 2018, 36, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hegarty, C.; Kirkwood, S.; Cardosi, M.F.; Lawrence, C.L.; Taylor, C.M.; Smith, R.B.; Davis, J. Disposable solid state pH sensor based on flavin polymer-ferrocyanide redox couples. Microchem. J. 2018, 139, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, Z.; Wang, S. CoA-dependent coordination polymer as a novel electrochemical sensing platform for sensitive detection of hydrogen peroxide in biological environments. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 801, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cisternas, R.; Ballesteros, L.; Valenzuela, M.L.; Kahlert, H.; Scholz, F. Decreasing the time response of calibration-free pH sensors based on tungsten bronze nanocrystals. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 801, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, C.H.; Sun, T.L. Evaluation of postural stability based on a force plate and inertial sensor during static balance measurements. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2018, 37, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vig, J.R.; Walls, F.L. A review of sensor sensitivity and stability. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/EIA International Frequency Control Symposium and Exhibition, Kansas City, MO, USA, 9 June 2000; pp. 30–33. [Google Scholar]
  53. Anuar, N.A.B.; Nor, N.H.M.; Awang, R.B.; Nakajima, H.; Tunmee, S.; Tripathi, M.; Dalton, A.; Goh, B.T. Low-temperature growth of graphene nanoplatelets by hot-wire chemical vapour deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 411, 126995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. El-Hossary, F.M.; Ghitas, A.; El-Rahman, A.M.A.; Shahat, M.A.; Fawey, M.H. The effective reduction of graphene oxide films using RF oxygen plasma treatment. Vacuum 2021, 188, 110158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pang, J.; Le, X.; Pang, K.; Dong, H.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Gao, C.; Fu, Y.; Xie, J. Highly precision carbon dioxide acoustic wave sensor with minimized humidity interference. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 338, 129824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, P.; Zhao, Z.; Shao, Z.; Tian, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, B.; Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Shen, X. Highly selective NH3 gas sensor based on polypyrrole/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites operating at room temperature. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 6168–6177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chiang, J.L.; Chou, J.C.; Chen, Y.C. Study on light and temperature properties of AlN pH-Ion-sensitive field-effect transistor devices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 4831–4837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sabah, F.A.; Ahmed, N.M.; Hassan, Z.; Almessiere, M.A. Influence of CuS membrane annealing time on the sensitivity of EGFET pH sensor. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2017, 71, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Isa, I.M.; Hamzah, M.H.; Sabian, I.S.; Ghani, S.A. Chitosan Based Heterogeneous Membrane Sensor for pH—A Prototype. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7, 12045–12053. [Google Scholar]
  60. Le, S.H.; Salmassi, B.R.; Burghartz, J.N.; Sarro, P.M. Characterization of ferroelectric thin film materials for FeRAM. In SAFE 2004; Semiconductor Advances for Future Electronics; STW Technology Foundation: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 710–713. [Google Scholar]
Materials 15 06515 g001 550
Figure 1. FE-SEM images of PAAMs pore widened for 45 min and sputter coated at current 6 mA for different deposition times; (a) 0, (b) 3, (c) 5, and (d) 7 min; (e,f) cross-section and oblique view images of Pt/PAAMs membranes. Insets of (a–d) showed enlarged images of a single cell, in addition to the cross-section image of PAAM without coating in (a).
Figure 1. FE-SEM images of PAAMs pore widened for 45 min and sputter coated at current 6 mA for different deposition times; (a) 0, (b) 3, (c) 5, and (d) 7 min; (e,f) cross-section and oblique view images of Pt/PAAMs membranes. Insets of (a–d) showed enlarged images of a single cell, in addition to the cross-section image of PAAM without coating in (a).
Materials 15 06515 g001
Materials 15 06515 g002 550
Figure 2. EDX spectra of Pt/PAAM samples coated with Pt for (a) 3 min and (b) 7min.
Figure 2. EDX spectra of Pt/PAAM samples coated with Pt for (a) 3 min and (b) 7min.
Materials 15 06515 g002
Materials 15 06515 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Reflection spectra of PAAMs/Pt at different deposition times, (b) the variation of dip position, and (c) dip reflectance % as a function of the deposition time for dips I, II, III, and IV.
Figure 3. (a) Reflection spectra of PAAMs/Pt at different deposition times, (b) the variation of dip position, and (c) dip reflectance % as a function of the deposition time for dips I, II, III, and IV.
Materials 15 06515 g003
Materials 15 06515 g004 550
Figure 4. Calibration curve of (a) PAAM, (b) PAAM/Pt sensors electrode, and (c) average hysteresis with different Pt coating times of 3, 5, and 7 min at 293 K.
Figure 4. Calibration curve of (a) PAAM, (b) PAAM/Pt sensors electrode, and (c) average hysteresis with different Pt coating times of 3, 5, and 7 min at 293 K.
Materials 15 06515 g004
Materials 15 06515 g005 550
Figure 5. Calibration curves of PAAM/Pt sensor electrode for different weeks at 293 K.
Figure 5. Calibration curves of PAAM/Pt sensor electrode for different weeks at 293 K.
Materials 15 06515 g005
Materials 15 06515 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Response time for PAAM/Pt sensor at different Pt coating times from 3 to 7 min, (b) reproducible studies, (c) time effect, and (d) reproducible studies and error bars for the PAAM/5 min-Pt sensor.
Figure 6. (a) Response time for PAAM/Pt sensor at different Pt coating times from 3 to 7 min, (b) reproducible studies, (c) time effect, and (d) reproducible studies and error bars for the PAAM/5 min-Pt sensor.
Materials 15 06515 g006
Table
Table 1. Summarized data for PAAM/Pt sensors at different Pt film coating times from 3 to 7 min in pH solutions (pH 3.0–10) at 293 K.
Table 1. Summarized data for PAAM/Pt sensors at different Pt film coating times from 3 to 7 min in pH solutions (pH 3.0–10) at 293 K.
Time Coating (min.)-Slope (mV/Decade)R2Response RangeDetection Limit
349.650.9893–1011.77
556.310.9743–1011.47
754.470.9743–1011.42
Table
Table 2. PAAM/Pt sensor selectivity to proton ions in different ion solutions.
Table 2. PAAM/Pt sensor selectivity to proton ions in different ion solutions.
IonsV (mV)RSD %
H+2500
Na+2334.91
K+2304.97
Mg2+2257.44
Table
Table 3. The summarized data for PAAM/Pt sensor electrode as a function of the number of weeks at 293 K.
Table 3. The summarized data for PAAM/Pt sensor electrode as a function of the number of weeks at 293 K.
Lifetime (Week)-Slope (mV/Decade)R2Response Range
156.310.9873–10
252.10.9803–10
349.70.9973–10
449.670.9773–10
551.20.9903–9
644.020.984–9
Table
Table 4. The calculated different pH sensing parameters for PAAM/5 min-Pt from Figure 6b.
Table 4. The calculated different pH sensing parameters for PAAM/5 min-Pt from Figure 6b.
Repeating Times-Slope (mV/Decade)R2Response Range
156.310.9893–10
255.560.983–10
355.00.9873–10
Table
Table 5. A comparison study of the pH sensing parameters for the PAAM/Pt sensor with previously studied materials.
Table 5. A comparison study of the pH sensing parameters for the PAAM/Pt sensor with previously studied materials.
pH Sensor ElectrodeSlope
mV/Decade		Response RangeRef
Au/poly(m-toluidine)57.346–10[25]
ZnO/Si22.44–11[60]
Chitosan56.02–9[59]
CuS27.82–12[58]
SiO253.01–9[57]
ZnO/Pd/ZnO52.05–12[20]
ITO membrane36.44–10[19]
PAAM/5 min Pt 56.313–10This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altowyan, A.S.; Shaban, M.; Gamel, A.; Gamal, A.; Ali, M.; Rabia, M. High-Performance pH Sensor Electrodes Based on a Hexagonal Pt Nanoparticle Array-Coated Nanoporous Alumina Membrane. Materials 2022, 15, 6515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196515

AMA Style

Altowyan AS, Shaban M, Gamel A, Gamal A, Ali M, Rabia M. High-Performance pH Sensor Electrodes Based on a Hexagonal Pt Nanoparticle Array-Coated Nanoporous Alumina Membrane. Materials. 2022; 15(19):6515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altowyan, Abeer S., Mohamed Shaban, Asmaa Gamel, Ahmed Gamal, Mona Ali, and Mohamed Rabia. 2022. "High-Performance pH Sensor Electrodes Based on a Hexagonal Pt Nanoparticle Array-Coated Nanoporous Alumina Membrane" Materials 15, no. 19: 6515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop