Next Article in Journal
Equilibrium and Kinetic Modeling of Crystal Violet Dye Adsorption by a Marine Diatom, Skeletonema costatum
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Springback Behavior of 316LN Stainless Steel in Micro-Scale Bending Processes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 18
10.3390/ma15186374
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on Mechanical Properties and Sensitivity of a Novel Modified Double-Base Rocket Propellant Plasticized by Bu-NENA

by
Shixiong Sun
1,2,
Benbo Zhao
1,2,*,
Yuan Cheng
1,2 and
Yunjun Luo
3,*
1
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
2
Dezhou Industrial Technology Research Institute of North University of China, Dezhou 253034, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(18), 6374; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186374
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 26 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The research and development of rocket propellants with a high solid content and superior mechanical and security performance is urgently needed. In this paper, a novel extruded modified double-base (EMDB) rocket propellant plasticized by N-butyl-N-nitratoethyl nitramine (Bu-NENA) was prepared to overcome this challenge. The results indicated that Bu-NENA decreased the mechanical sensitivity successfully, contributing to the mechanical properties against traditional nitroglycerin (NG) based EMDB propellants, while hexogen (RDX), which is beneficial to propellant energy, was not conducive to the elongation and sensitivity of the propellants. By contrast with the blank group (NG-based EMDB propellant, R0), the elongation of the optimized propellant at −40 °C was promoted by 100% from 3.54% to 7.09%. Moreover, the β-transition temperature decreased from −33.8 °C to −38.1 °C due to superior plasticization by Bu-NENA, which represents a better toughness. The friction sensitivity dropped by 100% from 46% to 0%. Simultaneously, the height for 50% probability of explosion (H50) increased by 87.2% from 17.2 cm to 32.2 cm. The results of this research could be used to predict a potential prospect in tactical weapons.

1. Introduction

Propellant is the working medium of rocket motor. It can be solid or liquid [1,2]. Extruded modified double-base (EMDB) propellants are one of the most commonly used solid propellants for tactical rockets due to the advantages of low cost, high production efficiency, mature process, good repeatability between batches and so on [3,4]. Nitrocellulose (NC) plasticized by nitroglycerin (NG) is the most commonly used binder of this kind of propellant. Aluminum (Al) powder and nitroamine explosives are also applied, which is attributed to their high energy density. The theoretical specific impulse (Isp) of propellants made up of NC/NG/Al/hexogen (RDX) or octogen (HMX), which is the typical formula, can reach up to 260 s. Meanwhile, the density can be as high as 1.70 g/cm3. The good comprehensive properties promoting this kind of propellant mean that they are widely used in rocket motors [5]. However, NG is extremely sensitive to mechanical stimuli which results in high mechanical sensitivity for NG-based EMDB propellants [6,7,8]. Especially when the solid content is up to 53% (calculated by the total amount of RDX and Al), the friction sensitivity of propellants can reach more than 50%, and the H50 can be lower than 15 cm, which affects their application in weapons [9]. Explosion accidents caused by sensitive properties happen from time-to-time, which can cause serious consequences for human lives and weapon platforms. Therefore, the development of modern weapons has an urgent need for low-sensitivity EMDB propellants. Additionally, the tensile performance of NG-based EMDB propellants with a high solid content is very poor. Elongation at −40 °C can be lower than 3%, which can readily cause structural damage and further accidents [10]. Hence, using insensitive plasticizers with high energy instead of NG has become an important subject in the field of solid rocket propellant research to reduce the mechanical sensitivity and improve the mechanical properties of propellants [11,12].
N-butyl-N-nitratoethyl nitramine (Bu-NENA) is a nitrate ester energetic plasticizer which was first synthesized by Blomquist and Fiedorik at 1949 [13]. The n-butyl group makes Bu-NENA have a better flexibility than NG. Meanwhile, the nitramine and nitrate ester groups can give it an appropriate energy level [14]. Reasonably distributed energetic groups make Bu-NENA less sensitive. Its friction and impact sensitivity are 0 and 110 cm (H50), respectively. In addition, it has good thermochemical stability. When used in gun propellants, which have some similarity with rocket propellants in their composition, while their configuration and performance are quite different, it can reduce the sensitivity of the products significantly, and improve the process properties and low-temperature mechanical properties [15]. In short, the comprehensive properties of many energetic composite materials could be improved with the use of Bu-NENA [16,17]. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the application of Bu-NENA in EMDB propellants with a high solid content.
Inspired by the beneficial effects of Bu-NENA on gun propellants [16], we previously introduced it into a double-base rocket propellant [18], which was the original type of solid propellant and had no solid fillers. It showed great potential for application in rocket propellants. In view of the urgent demand of modern weapon platforms for low sensitivity propellants, a novel series of EMDB rocket propellants with a high solid content were prepared by using Bu-NENA with good flexibility and low sensitivity as a plasticizer. The influence of the Bu-NENA and RDX contents on the sensitivity and mechanical properties of EMDB propellants was studied. The results showed that the comprehensive performance of EMDB propellant could be improved due to the good physical and chemical properties of Bu-NENA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

NC (12.0% N) and nitroglycerin (NG) were obtained from Shanxi Northern Xing’an Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, China. Bu-NENA was obtained from Liming Research Institute of Chemical Industry, Luoyang, China. Hexogen (RDX) of 72 μm (from supplier) was obtained from Gansu Silver Light Chemical Industry Group Co., Ltd., Baiyin, China. Spherical Al of 3 μm was obtained from Changyuan Mingyu Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd., Xinxiang, China.

2.2. Propellant Preparation

The novel EMDB propellants plasticized by Bu-NENA with thickness ca. 2 mm were prepared through the traditional solvent-free method. The preparation process was similar to that described in the literature [19]. EMDB propellant plasticized by NG was also prepared as a control. The detailed chemical ingredients of the prepared propellants are shown in Table 1. The additives were organic lead-salt, organic copper-salt and carbon black, vaseline and N, N’-dimethyl carbanilide. It should be noted that the NC/Bu-NENA adhesive decreases with the increase in RDX content for R series EMDB propellants. The mass ratio of NC/Bu-NENA remained 43/57 due to the results of previous exploration experiments in double-base propellant in which there were no solid fillers [18].

2.3. Characterization and Analysis

2.3.1. Mechanical Properties Test

The propellant sheet was cut into dumbbell-shaped test specimens. The propellant mechanical properties were conducted on the AGS-J Electronic Universal Testing Machine (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with the China Military Standard GJB 770B-2005 413.1. The conditions were: temperature −40 °C, 20 °C and 50 °C; and tensile rate 10 mm/min. The testing apparatus was equipped with a high–low temperature test box which could provide the required ambient temperature. The propellant specimens were placed in the test box for 40 min before being tested.

2.3.2. Dynamic Mechanical Properties Test

Dynamic mechanical property analysis was conducted using a dynamic thermomechanical analyzer (DMA, METTLER TOLEDO, DMA/SDTA 861e, Zurich, Switzerland) in shear mode. The conditions were: temperature −120~120 °C; heating rate 3 K/min; dynamic force 5 N; frequency 1 Hz; amplitude 5 μm; and sample size 5 mm × 5 mm× 2 mm.

2.3.3. Sensitivity Measurement

The friction sensitivity was determined according to the China Military Standard GJB 770B-2005 601.2 using a pendulum friction apparatus (Beijing nachen Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The conditions were: pendulum weight 1.5 kg; swaying angle 66 deg; pressure 2.45 MPa; and sample mass 20 ± 1 mg. The initiation probability P was obtained from 50 trials. The impact sensitivity was determined according to the China Military Standard GJB 770B-2005 602.1 on a drop-hammer apparatus (Beijing nachen Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) using an up-and-down method. The conditions were: sample mass 30 mg; and hammer weight 2 kg. Based on 25 go/no-go trials, the height for 50% probability of explosion (H50) could be calculated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mechanical Properties of EMDB Propellants

Table S1 in the supporting information shows the propellants mechanical properties. In order to obtain the influence law of the Bu-NENA on the EMDB propellants mechanical properties more intuitively, the curves of the tensile strength at 50 °C and elongation at −40 °C with Bu-NENA and RDX content are shown in Figure 1.
It could be found from Table S1 and Figure 1 that the tensile strength of the prepared propellants reduced slightly compared with the referenced propellant. This was mainly caused by two reasons. On the one hand, it has been proved that Bu-NENA can plasticize NC more readily, which can decrease the intermolecular force [20], enhancing the molecular mobility of NC. This is a negative factor for the tensile strength of propellants. On the other hand, Bu-NENA increased the fluidity of propellant adhesion [21]. The defects could be decreased, and the molding quality could be promoted, which is a positive factor for its tensile strength. The first factor is more influential between the two reasons. Therefore, the tensile strength of the prepared propellants was slightly lower than that of the control, while the elongation of the prepared propellants could be significantly improved over that of the blank group. This is because both of the two kinds of effects mentioned above could have contributed to the elongation of the prepared propellants.
Moreover, both the tensile strength and the elongation of the prepared propellants reduced with the increase in the RDX content. This was mainly caused by the relatively poor interface character between the RDX and double-base adhesive [22]. The insufficient wettability lowered the adhesion between them, which may have caused the formation of microscopic defects in the EMDB propellant with a high solid content. Even if there are no defects in the propellant, this could readily occur when subjected to an external force due to the low adhesion. These defects make propellants break earlier. Consequently, both the tensile strength and the elongation of the prepared propellants reduced along with the increase in RDX content. Additionally, the NC/Bu-NENA adhesive decreased with the increase in RDX content. The percentage reduction reduced the deformation capacity of the propellant, which could also be responsible for the decline in elongation. It is worth noting that the mass ratio of NC/Bu-NENA remained 43/57 in the prepared propellants. Therefore, the reduction in Bu-NENA content was not related to the propellant’s mechanical properties directly.
As mentioned above, it could be concluded that a lower content of RDX may endow better mechanical properties to propellants. However, it has to be noted that a high RDX content is beneficial for improving the Isp of propellants, as shown in Table 2 (calculated due to the NASA 273 software based on the minimum free energy method). As a result, R3 could be considered the best among all of the prepared propellants, as it exhibited both improved mechanical properties and a satisfactory theoretical specific impulse. Quantitatively, the elongation of the R3 propellant at −40 °C increased by 100% from 3.54% to 7.09% compared with the control, and the tensile strength at 50 °C of the R3 propellant was 1.11 MPa, which is the same level as the control.

3.2. Dynamic Mechanical Properties of EMDB Propellants

Dynamic thermomechanical analysis was conducted for further understanding of the influence of the Bu-NENA and RDX on the properties of the propellants. The DMA curves of the R3 propellant are shown in Figure 2, and the DMA curves of the other prepared propellants, which are similar to that of R3, are given in Figure S1 in the supplementary files. The transformation of the dynamic storage modulus (E′), dynamic loss modulus (E′) and Tanδ of the R3 propellant against the temperature are shown in Figure 2. E′ represents the elastic properties of the propellant, E” represents viscous properties, and Tanδ represents damping of the propellant (E″/E′) [23]. As shown in Figure 2, the storage modulus E′ exhibited two obvious reductions at temperatures ca. −50.0 °C and 0 °C (onset temperature), which were considered to be related to the softening of the propellant. Furthermore, there are two peaks in the E” curve at the same region. This is due to the presence of the two thermal transitions for the NC/Bu-NENA adhesion. The β-transition was in the range of −50~0 °C, while the α-transition appeared in the range of 0~50 °C. The β-transition is attributed to the single-bond rotation, stretching and bending of side groups, cooperative motion between the side groups of NC and Bu-NENA, and so on. The α-transition was considered to be associated with some slightly larger motion unit-like segment in the NC molecular backbone. The peak temperature of the two transitions (Tα and Tβ) are important for the mechanical performance of propellants, which is focused on by many researchers. According to the literature [9], there are at least a few methods of glass-transition determination from the results obtained by dynamic mechanical analysis, among which the peak temperature of Tanδ is preferred due to its relatively stable value (Tanδ cannot be disturbed by test conditions readily) [24]. Accordingly, the temperature of the β-transition and α-transition were −38.1 °C and 58.2 °C, respectively.
The E′, E″ and Tanδ plots of the blank EMDB propellant (R0) are shown in Figure 3. It is obvious that the trends of change for the three curves were similar with that of the R3 propellant plasticized by Bu-NENA, while the transition temperatures differed. The Tβ of the R3 was −38.1 °C, which is lower than that of R0 (−33.8 °C). The difference mainly arose from the more obvious reduction in Bu-NENA on the intermolecular forces between the adhesive molecules, which endowed Bu-NENA with a better plasticization effort. The motion of side groups in the NC molecule of R3 propellant could occur more readily than in R0 propellant, which is to say the activation energy of molecular motion of R0 is lower. Furthermore, the elastic deformation energy of R0 is more easily dissipated and converted into heat [25]. Therefore, the β-transition temperature of R3 decreased by a couple of degrees. As for the α-transition, the Tα of the R3 propellant was similar to that of the R0 propellant. This might have been caused by the influence of RDX fillers on the double-base adhesive. There are inducing forces between the nitramine groups in RDX and the nitrate ester group in the adhesive. This kind of intermolecular force is less affected by temperature compared with the interaction force between NC molecules such as hydrogen bonds. The difference in the mentioned interaction force between the R3 and R0 propellants was weakened due to the temperature rising. However, the RDX content in R3 was slightly higher than that in R0, which was not conducive to the motion of adhesive molecules in the R3 propellant. Accordingly, the Tα of the R3 propellant was similar with that of the R0 propellant.
In order to obtain the effect of RDX on the glass transition temperature of propellants more intuitively, the values of Tα and Tβ are given in Figure 4 and Table S2 in the supporting information. Tβ is a parameter of the adhesive system of propellants, which is related to the molecular motion of the side group in NC. A lower Tβ means better molecular mobility of the NC/Bu-NENA system. Additionally, deformation could occur more readily for adhesive systems at low temperature. It is obvious that both Tα and Tβ increased along with the enrichment of the RDX concentration. It may have been mainly caused by the hindrance to molecular motion of the adhesive from RDX as mentioned above.
What is interesting is that we found that there was some relationship between elongation at −40 °C and Tanδ as shown in Figure 5. This might be associated with the origin of Tanδ. Tanδ is calculated from E″/E′ which represents the ratio of energy that can be dissipated into heat from stored energy [26], that is, the so-called damping or toughness. Both the damping and elongation depend on the intermolecular interaction characteristics of propellants during deformation. Thereby, the change law of Tanδ was consistent with the elongation of the prepared propellants. However, there was no such relationship between the prepared propellants and the blank sample as shown in Figure 5. It may have been caused by the difference between the adhesive of the two kinds of EMDB propellant since the plasticization effort of Bu-NENA was significantly better than that of NG.

3.3. Mechanical Sensitivity

The friction and impact sensitivity of the prepared propellants are shown in Figure 6. It can be seen from Figure 6 that the mechanical sensitivity of the prepared propellants was significantly lower than that of the R0 propellant. Many reasons may contribute to the reduction in sensitivity. First of all, Bu-NENA is insensitive to mechanical stimuli [12], as it can absorb the energy transmitted by external stimulation effectively [27,28]. Secondly, Bu-NENA can plasticize NC and enhance the molecular motion ability of the adhesive system. Under mechanical stimulation, the adhesive can produce a continuous plastic flow forming a buffer protection for the solid fillers and reduce the probability of hot spot formation resulting from friction and the extrusion of fillers [29,30]. At the same time, the probability of adiabatic compression hot spot formation could be reduced due to the enhancement of adhesive movement ability [31]. Thirdly, the oxygen balance of the prepared propellants was slightly lower than that of the control, which could also reduce the sensitivity of propellants [32].
It is worth noting that the mechanical sensitivity increased slightly with the RDX content increasing, which may have been caused by the physical and chemical properties of RDX. The high mechanical sensitivity of RDX is determined by its own characteristics and it could be exacerbated due to the irregular shape and crystal defects in industrial RDX products [8]. The probability of compression and shear hot spot formation increased along with RDX content increasing in the prepared propellants. Therefore, the corresponding friction and impact sensitivity increased slightly as shown in Figure 6. Similarly to Section 3.1, it was expected to find a balance between excellent mechanical sensitivity and a satisfactory theoretical specific impulse. As shown, the friction sensitivity of the R3 propellant reduced 100% from 46% to 0% and the H50 increased by 87.2% from 17.2 cm to 32.2 cm. At the same time, the increase in RDX content was beneficial to the Isp due to its high energy density nature. Thereby, the R3 was considered to be the optimal formula, which has potential applications.

4. Conclusions

A novel EMDB propellant plasticized by Bu-NENA with a high solid content was prepared, and the mechanical properties and mechanical sensitivity were evaluated. The main conclusions of this work are as follows:
(1) NC was well plasticized by Bu-NENA. The intermolecular forces were decreased, and the molecular mobility of NC was enhanced. Therefore, the β-transition temperature decreased and elongation at −40 °C was promoted. By contrast with the blank group, the Tβ for the R3 propellant, which is considered to be a better formula, decreased from −33.8 °C to −38.1 °C, and the elongation at −40 °C increased by 100% from 3.54% to 7.09%. The tensile strength of the R3 propellant at 50 °C remained at the same level as that of the control due to the contribution from RDX.
(2) Bu-NENA was insensitive to mechanical stimuli. It could absorb the energy transmitted by external stimulation effectively and reduce internal defects, resulting in the mechanical sensitivity of the prepared propellants being lower than that of the control, while the RDX, which is beneficial to propellant energy, was not conducive to the mechanical sensitivity of propellant. The friction sensitivity of R3 dropped by 100% from 46% to 0%, whilst simultaneously its H50 increased by 87.2% from 17.2 cm to 32.2 cm.
In summary, the low-temperature mechanical properties and sensitivities were improved significantly for the novel EMDB propellant, and it could be predicted to be a potential prospect in tactical weapons. Since the two drawbacks, which are of concern to many researchers, were largely improved upon, we will be devoted to the study of the combustion and experimental specific impulse performance of EMDB propellants in future work.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15186374/s1, Figure S1: The E′, E″ and Tanδ plots of the prepared propellants. Table S1: The mechanical properties of the EMDB propellant plasticized by Bu-NENA. Table S2: The transition temperature of the EMDB propellant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and Y.C.; Data curation, S.S. and B.Z.; Formal analysis, B.Z. and Y.C.; Investigation, S.S. and B.Z.; Methodology, S.S., B.Z. and Y.L.; Project administration, Y.L.; Writing—original draft, S.S. and B.Z. writing—review and editing, S.S. and B.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Shanxi Northern Xing’an Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. offered the market limited NC/NG systems, and their researchers gave us a lot of technical guidance. We are grateful for that.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xing, R.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F.; Hou, C. Mechanical behavior and constitutive model of NEPE solid propellant in finite deformation. Mech. Mater. 2022, 172, 104383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rudinsky, A.V.; Yagodnikov, D.A.; Ryzhkov, S.V.; Onufriev, V.V. Features of intrinsic-electric-field formation in low-temperature oxygen-methane plasma. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2021, 47, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Elbasuney, S.; Fahd, A.; Mostafa, H.E.; Mostsfs, S.F.; Sadek, R. Chemical stability, thermal behavior, and shelf life assessment of extruded modified double-base propellants. Def. Technol. 2018, 14, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tan, H.M. The Chemistry and Technology of Solid Rocket Propellant, 1st ed.; Beijing Institute of Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2015; pp. 114–420. [Google Scholar]
  5. Matečić Mušanić, S.; Sućeska, M. Dynamic mechanical properties of artificially aged double base rocket propellant and possibilities for prediction of their service lifetime. Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mat. 2013, 10, 225–244. [Google Scholar]
  6. Agrawal, J.P.; Singh, H. Qualitative assessment of nitroglycerin migration from double-base and composite modified double-base rocket propellants: Concepts and methods of prevention. Propellants Explos. Pyrot. 1993, 18, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reese, D.A.; Groven, L.J.; Son, S.F. Formulation and characterization of a new nitroglycerin-free double base propellant. Propellants Explos. Pyrot. 2014, 39, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, S.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, G.; Luo, Y. Influence of polytetrafluorethylene on the mechanical and safety properties of a composite modified double base propellant. Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mat. 2018, 15, 468–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Matečić Mušanić, S.; Sućeska, M. Artificial ageing of double base rocket propellant: Effect on dynamic mechanical properties. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2009, 96, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, S.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, G.; Luo, Y. Applying mechanically activated Al/PTFE in CMDB propellant. Propellants Explos. Pyrot. 2018, 43, 1105–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chin, A.; Ellison, D.S.; Poehlein, S.K.; Ahn, M.K. Investigation of the decomposition mechanism and thermal stability of nitrocellulose/nitroglycerine based propellants by electron spin resonance. Propellants Explos. Pyrot. 2007, 32, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, B.; Liu, Q.; Li, W.; Huang, J.; Ling, J. Effect of TEGDN content and NC Nitrogen content on mechanical properties of double-base propellant. Chin. J. Explos. Propellants 2017, 40, 92–96. [Google Scholar]
  13. Blomquist, A.T.; Fiedorek, F.T. Process of Preparing Nitroxy Alkyl Nitramines. U.S. Patent 2678946, 18 May 1954. [Google Scholar]
  14. Min, B.S.; Park, Y.C. A study on the aliphatic energetic plasticizers containing nitrate ester and nitramine. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2009, 15, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahmed, M.; Petr, S.; Robert, M.; Jan, Z. Ballistic testing and thermal behavior of cast double-base propellant containing Bu-NENA. Chin. J. Explos. Propellants 2017, 40, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chakraborthy, T.K.; Raha, K.C.; Omprakash, B.; Singh, A. A study on gun propellants based on butyl-NENA. J. Energ. Mater. 2004, 22, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kubota, N. Propellants and Explosives; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2015; pp. 69–112. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhao, B.; Xia, M.; Huang, J.; Li, W.; Liu, Q.; Luo, Y. Characterization of Bu-NENA /NC low sensitive double-base propellant. Chin. J. Explos. Propellants 2017, 25, 794–798. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, S.; Song, M.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, G.; Luo, Y. A facile way to prolong service life of double base propellant. Materials 2018, 11, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qi, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Liu, F.; Song, Z.; Zhang, J. Molecular dynamics simulation of NC/NG blends. Acta Armamentarii 2013, 34, 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  21. Qi, X.; Zhang, H.; Guo, X.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J. Experiments and simulation on plastication of NENA on NC. J. Solid Rocket Technol. 2013, 36, 269–273. [Google Scholar]
  22. An, C.; Li, F.; Wang, J.; Guo, X. Surface coating of nitroamine explosives and its effects on the performance of composite modified double-base propellants. J. Propul. Power 2012, 28, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pachman, J.; Šelešovský, J. Dynamic mechanical analysis for characterization of solid rocket propellants-transitions in double base propellant. Sci. Technol. Energ. Ma. 2005, 66, 380–383. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Heng, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, P.; Yin, C. The characterization of aging property of modified double-base propellant GS-1by dynamic mechanical analyzer GS-1. Chin. J. Explos. Propellants 2006, 29, 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cegla, M.; Borkowski, J.; Zmywaczyk, J.; Koniorczyk, P. Dynamic mechanical analysis of double base rocket propellants. Bull. Mil. Univ. Technol. 2016, 65, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ho, S.Y.; Fong, C.W. Correlation between fracture properties and dynamic mechanical relaxations in compo-site propellants. Polymer 1987, 28, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Field, J.E.; Bourne, N.K.; Palmer, S.J.P.; Walley, S.M. Hot-spot ignition mechanisms for explosives and propellants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 1992, 339, 269–283. [Google Scholar]
  28. Asthana, S.N.; Athawale, B.K.; Singh, H. Impact, friction, shock sensitivities and DDT behaviour of advanced CMDB propellants. Def. Sci. J. 1989, 39, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ho, S.Y.; Fong, C.W. Relationship between impact ignition sensitivity and kinetics of the thermal decomposition of solid propellants. Combust. Flame 1989, 75, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Field, J.E.; Swallowe, G.M.; Heavens, S.N. Ignition mechanisms of explosives during mechanical deformation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1982, 382, 231–244. [Google Scholar]
  31. Walley, S.M.; Field, J.E.; Palmer, S. Impact sensitivity of propellants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1992, 438, 571–583. [Google Scholar]
  32. Choudhari, M.K.; Dhar, S.S.; Shrotri, P.G.; Haridwar, S. Effect of high energy materials on sensitivity of composite modified double base CMDB propellant system. Def. Sci. J. 1992, 42, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Materials 15 06374 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanical properties of EMDB propellant: (a) Tensile strength of EMDB propellant at 50 °C; (b) Elongation of EMDB propellant at −40 °C.
Figure 1. Mechanical properties of EMDB propellant: (a) Tensile strength of EMDB propellant at 50 °C; (b) Elongation of EMDB propellant at −40 °C.
Materials 15 06374 g001
Materials 15 06374 g002 550
Figure 2. The E′, E″ and Tanδ curves of R3 propellant.
Figure 2. The E′, E″ and Tanδ curves of R3 propellant.
Materials 15 06374 g002
Materials 15 06374 g003 550
Figure 3. The E′, E″ and Tanδ curves of R0 propellant.
Figure 3. The E′, E″ and Tanδ curves of R0 propellant.
Materials 15 06374 g003
Materials 15 06374 g004 550
Figure 4. The values of Tα and Tβ of prepared propellants.
Figure 4. The values of Tα and Tβ of prepared propellants.
Materials 15 06374 g004
Materials 15 06374 g005 550
Figure 5. The elongation and Tanδ of R series of propellants.
Figure 5. The elongation and Tanδ of R series of propellants.
Materials 15 06374 g005
Materials 15 06374 g006 550
Figure 6. The friction and impact sensitivity of R series of propellants.
Figure 6. The friction and impact sensitivity of R series of propellants.
Materials 15 06374 g006
Table
Table 1. The composition of EMDB propellant plasticized by Bu-NENA (wt. %).
Table 1. The composition of EMDB propellant plasticized by Bu-NENA (wt. %).
SampleNC/%NG/%Bu-NENA/%RDX/%Al/%Additives/%
R021.422 4763.6
R125.9 19.54563.6
R224.3 19.14763.6
R323.6 17.84963.6
R422.5 16.95163.6
R521.3 16.15363.6
R620.2 15.25563.6
Table
Table 2. The theoretical specific impulse of prepared propellants.
Table 2. The theoretical specific impulse of prepared propellants.
SampleOB 1ρ/cm−3Isp/s
R10.44671.634257.4
R20.44861.640258.2
R30.45381.651258.9
R40.45771.659259.6
R50.46131.667260.4
R60.46531.676261.1
1 OB is the oxygen balance.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, S.; Zhao, B.; Cheng, Y.; Luo, Y. Research on Mechanical Properties and Sensitivity of a Novel Modified Double-Base Rocket Propellant Plasticized by Bu-NENA. Materials 2022, 15, 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186374

AMA Style

Sun S, Zhao B, Cheng Y, Luo Y. Research on Mechanical Properties and Sensitivity of a Novel Modified Double-Base Rocket Propellant Plasticized by Bu-NENA. Materials. 2022; 15(18):6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Shixiong, Benbo Zhao, Yuan Cheng, and Yunjun Luo. 2022. "Research on Mechanical Properties and Sensitivity of a Novel Modified Double-Base Rocket Propellant Plasticized by Bu-NENA" Materials 15, no. 18: 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop