Next Article in Journal
Tailoring Titanium Sheet Metal Using Laser Metal Deposition to Improve Room Temperature Single-Point Incremental Forming
Previous Article in Journal
Fracture Behavior and Digital Image Analysis of GFRP Reinforced Concrete Notched Beams
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Research on Mechanical and Shrinkage Properties of Alkali Activated Low-Carbon Green Concrete

1
Department of Civil and Airport Engineering, College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
2
College of Architectural Engineering, Yangzhou Polytechnic Institute, Yangzhou 225127, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(17), 5984; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175984
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 21 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 30 August 2022

Abstract

:
This paper describes orthogonal experiments to investigat the effects of content of fly ash and slag, sol ratio, modulus of sodium silicate and expander on the compressive strength and shrinkage of alkali activated low-carbon green concrete (AAGC) of different ages. The microstructures and hydration product compositions of AAGC with different proportions were further studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP). The results show that with an increase of fly ash content, the compressive strength of AAGC gradually decreases, the decline of compressive strength at 28 d is smaller than that of 7 d, and the shrinkage strain gradually increases at 28 d. As the sol ratio increases, the compressive strength increases first and then decreases. When the sol ratio is 0.42, the compressive strength is maximal at 28 d; the same is true for compressive strength at 7 d. Additionally, an increase of sol ratio can reduce the shrinkage strain at 28 d. Finally, when the sol ratio was 0.46, the shrinkage decreased by 30.5% compared with 0.40 at 28 d. As the modulus of sodium silicate (Ms) increases, the compressive strength first increases and then decreases. When Ms is 1.4, the compressive strength reaches the maximum. As Ms increases, the shrinkage strain decreases first and then increases at 28 d. When Ms is 1.0, the shrinkage strain is the maximum at 28 d. Finally, with an increase in the content of expander, the compressive strength decreases at 7 d and 28 d, and the shrinkage strain decreases at 28 d. The shrinkage strain at 28 d is the minimum with 9% content. AAGC mixed with a small amount of fly ash and expander has more hydration products and significantly reduced cracks. In addition, the proportion of small hole volume of AAGC increases, while the proportion of large hole volume decreases. AAGC mixed with fly ash and slag without expander has more unhydrated particles and its structure is loose.

1. Introduction

Concrete is the most widely used building material, but a lack of resources and the environmental pollution it causes make the shortcomings of Portland cement more obvious. Compared with ordinary cement, alkali-activated, low-carbon green material, as a new cementitious material, has excellent performance, and its production is more energy efficient. According to the statistics of CO2 emissions, the amount of CO2 generated by alkali-excited cementitious materials and silicates in the production process is only about 1/5 that of Portland cement [1,2]. The quantities of industrial solid waste materials commonly used as alkali activated materials are increasing year by year. Therefore, accelerating the utilization of industrial solid waste is an inevitable requirement for sustainable development, and alkali-activated cementitious materials have been proved to have equivalent or even better performance than Portland cement [3,4,5]. Due to their low-carbon, environmentally friendly, and low-cost production process, they are considered in the material industry all over the world as one of the hottest new green gel materials of the 21st century. In addition, they have a wide range of application prospects [6,7,8].
Scholars around the world have conducted a great deal of experimental research on the performance of alkali activated cementitious material concrete. It has been found that the amount of fly ash [9], slag [10], alkali activator [11], sol ratio [12] and admixture [13] all have a great influence on the shrinkage of alkali activated concrete. The shrinkage of alkali activated fly ash and slag concrete with a sol ratio of 0.42 is smaller than that with a sol ratio of 0.34, that is, with an increase of sol ratio, the drying shrinkage decreases [14]. However, the drying shrinkage of alkali activated slag cementitious material is much larger than that of ordinary cement [15,16]. The modulus of sodium silicate decreases, as do those of alkali activated fly ash and fly ash plus slag concrete [17,18]. Some scholars have found that when 30% limestone is added to alkali activated slag concrete, shrinkage increases, but when the limestone content is increased to 50%, the shrinkage decreases [19]. The drying shrinkage of alkali excited fly ash plus slag concrete mainly occurs in the first 7 d before subsequently slowing down, reaching 1045 με after half a year; ultimately, the total shrinkage is less than that of ordinary concrete [20]. Alkali excited slag concrete undergoes significant shrinkage in the first 7 d; the reason for this is that the internal relative humidity decreases rapidly, which causes a rapid decrease in the surface tension [21]. The use of an expander is effective for dry shrinkage compensation with alkali slag concrete; in this way the dry shrinkage rate can be reduced proportionally to the amount of expander added. However, the addition of an expansion agent also slightly reduces the strength of the concrete [22]. Composite systems of alkali activated fly ash and slag have better performance than any single system [23,24]. When the slag content is more than 0.7, the setting time decreases significantly, while the shrinkage cracks on the surface of the specimen increase [25,26]. Research has shown that increasing the content of fly ash in fly ash slag mixed cementitious material will prolong the setting time, reduce the drying shrinkage and compressive strength, and improve the processing performance. Fly ash can increase the volume stability of cementitious material because spherical fly ash particles serve as a micro aggregate [27].
Previous research on the durability of alkali activated concrete has focused on acid resistance, impermeability, freeze-thaw, carbonation and other aspects [28,29,30,31,32]. As such, there is a lack of research on its shrinkage properties. The cracking caused by shrinkage will affect the life of the component. In order to correctly evaluate the early cracking risk of alkali excited green concrete, it is necessary to study its shrinkage performance. Such research will also promote the maturity of alkali excited green cementitious material technology to a certain extent.
To date, few studies have examined the effects of the composite proportion of fly ash and slag, sol ratio, modulus of sodium silicate and expander on alkali activated low-carbon green concrete. In this paper, alkali activated low-carbon green concrete was prepared by orthogonal experiments. Such experiments were designed to evaluate the effects of the composite ratio of fly ash and slag, sol ratio, modulus of sodium silicate and expander on the compressive strength and shrinkage properties of alkali activated low-carbon green concrete of different ages. In addition, the microstructures and product compositions of alkali activated low-carbon green concrete with different proportions were further studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP).

2. Experiment Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The performance indicators of the slag and fly ash, produced by Nanjing company, met the requirements of the GB/T18046-2000 and GB/T1596-2005 Chinese standards, respectively. The chemical composition, as provided by the manufacturer, is shown in Table 1. Sodium silicate, with a modulus (Ms) of 3.24 and Na2O and SiO2 contents of 8.73 wt% and 27.45 wt%, respectively, was produced by a company in Shanghai. Ms was adjusted by adding NaOH. The specific indicators are shown in Table 2. Analytically pure NaOH, i.e., the main component content was greater than 99%, was produced by a company in Shanghai. River sand with fineness modulus of 2.58 and basalt gravel with particle size of 5–20 mm were used. The expander was produced by a company in Nanjing; the performance indicators are shown in Table 3. The expander met the requirements of GB50119-2013.

2.2. Specimen Preparation and Testing

In order to research the effect of fly ash content, sol ratio, Ms and expander content on the performance of AAGC, the L16 (44) orthogonal test was adopted. Table 4 and Table 5 list the orthogonal test factor levels and AAGC mix ratios, respectively.
Demolded cubic specimens of 100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm were placed in a curing chamber for 7 d and 28 d, respectively. The temperature was maintained at 20 °C and the relative humidity was above 95%. The specimens were used to measure compressive strength, according to the relevant test methods in GB-T50081-2011, with a 500 t micro-electro-hydraulic servo universal testing machine.
The shrinkage deformation at different ages was tested according to GB/T 50082-2009. The size of the specimen was 55 × 55 × 280 mm3, with a probe installed at both ends. The specimen was demolded after forming for 24 h ± 2 h. Then, it was placed in a curing box to allow continued curing for 3 d at 20 °C and RH ≥ 95%, Next, its initial length (L0) was measured using a micrometer. Subsequently, curing continued and the length (Lt) of the specimen was measured at different ages. The shrinkage strain was calculated using Equation (1):
ε s t = L   0   L t L
where εst is shrinkage strain of specimens at different ages, L is the measuring distance of the specimen, i.e., the sum of the length of the concrete specimen minus the embedding depth of the two probes, in mm.
The 5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm samples that had been cured for 28 d were immersed in absolute ethanol for 3 d before being taken out and dried in a vacuum at 60 °C for 48 h. A JSM-6510 high-resolution scanning electron microscope was used for SEM scanning analysis.
Samples were taken from a crushed rectangular specimen that had been cured for 28 d, immersed in absolute ethanol for 3 d, dried in a vacuum at 60 °C for 24 h, partially ground to powder and sieved through an 80-μm sieve. An XRD test was then used to analyze the phases of the specimen under a scanning range of 10° to 80° at a scanning rate of 0.30 s/step using a Bruker-Axs D8 DISCOVER with step size = 0.02°. The samples were analyzed by mercury intrusion, performed using an Auto Pore IV 9510 mercury injection meter produced by Micromeritics Instrument Corporation (Norcross, GA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Compressive Strength

The effects of fly ash content, sol ratio, Ms and expander content on the compressive strength of AAGC at 7 d and 28 d are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1a shows that as the content of fly ash increased, the compressive strength of AAGC decreased gradually. As the content of fly ash increased from 0 to 45%, the compressive strength of samples cured for 7 d and 28 d decreased from 48.3 to 35.4 MPa and from 58.0 to 42.1 MPa, respectively. The main reason for this is that slag has more active oxides than fly ash, and the CaO content of fly ash is low. With the increase of fly ash content, the activity of green cementitious materials decreased, as did the hydration rate and quantity of hydration products. Additionally, the calcium–silicon ratio in the C-S-H gel decreased after hydration. It can be seen from the figure that the strength development of AAGC slowed due to the addition of fly ash, and that the decline in compressive strength at 28 d was smaller than that of 7 d.
As illustrated in Figure 1b, with the increase of sol ratio, the compressive strength showed an increasing and then a decreasing trend at 7 d and 28 d. When the sol ratio was 0.42, the compressive strength reached the maximum at 28 d; the same was true for compressive strength at 7 d.
As shown in Figure 1c, with the increase in Ms from 1.0 to 1.4, the compressive strength of AAGC cured for 7 d and 28 d increased. When sodium silicate and slag are mixed, the former hydrolyzes to form NaOH and Si(OH)4. The Si(OH)4 silica gel is then transformed into active SiO2 and H2O, so the amount of active SiO2 is determined by Ms. OH penetrates the surface of slag in alkaline solution, enters the vitreous body, dissociates the vitreous body and dissociates Ca2+ and SiO44−, because Ca2+ has a high diffusion speed and reacts with SiO44− to form C-S-H gel. The Ms directly affects the amount of SiO2 and active OH, and the activation effect is determined by SiO2 and active OH. Therefore, when the Ms increases, the compressive strength increases. However, when the Ms is too great, the calcium–silicon ratio decreases, as do the quantity of hydration products and the compressive strength of the concrete. In summary, when the Ms reaches 1.6, the balance of the two-sided effect of silica on the compressive strength is broken and the compressive strength decreases.
Figure 1d shows that as the content of expander was increased, the compressive strength of AAGC cured for 7 d and 28 d decreased gradually. As the content of expander increased from 0 to 9%, the compressive strength of the samples cured for 7 d and 28 d decreased from 44.9 to 34.2 MPa and from 54.8 to 41.3 MPa, respectively. The reason for this is that the formed specimen is unconstrained, the hydration speed of calcium oxide is slow; after alkali excitation cementitious materials coagulate and harden, calcium oxide particles then continue to hydrate, and the hydration products damage the already coagulated and hardened structure. In addition, with the increase of the content of expander, CaO forms Ca(OH)2, which increases the expansion of concrete, thus destroying the interface structure and reducing the compressive strength.

3.2. Drying Shrinkage

The effects of fly ash content, sol ratio, Ms and expander content on the drying shrinkage of AAGC are displayed in Figure 2.
Figure 2a shows that AAGC without fly ash underwent the most shrinkage. When the fly ash content was 15%, 30% and 45%, respectively, the shrinkage comprised 70.3%, 75.6% and 75.6% of the volume of the concrete with 15% fly ash content at 28 d. This shows that the addition of fly ash can significantly inhibit the shrinkage of AAGC. The main reason for this is that fly ash has low activity, thereby inhibiting the hydration rate and improving the pore structure. The hydration of fly ash requires relatively less water, and the particle gradation formed by the mixing of fly ash and slag is better, which also reduces the area of contact with water and is conducive to inhibiting the shrinkage deformation of a fly ash and slag composite system. At the same time, the density of the C-S-H gel in AAGC mixed with fly ash was lower than that of the pure slag material. Under the same conditions, the volume of C-S-H gel generated in the composite system was larger than that of pure slag, which played a role in compensating for the shrinkage.
As illustrated in Figure 2b, when the sol ratio was 0.42, 0.44 and 0.46, shrinkage was reduced by 26.0%, 28.0% and 30.5% compared with a 0.40 sol ratio at 28 d, respectively. This shows that the shrinkage deformation of AAGC can be effectively reduced by adjusting the sol ratio.
As shown in Figure 2c, when the Ms increased from 1.0 to 1.2, 1.4 and 1.6, the shrinkage strain of AAGC decreased by 20.3%, 19.0% and 4.9% at 28 d, respectively. When the Ms was 1.2, the shrinkage strain reached the minimum at 28 d. The Ms has a dual effect on the shrinkage deformation of AAGC. On the one hand, an increase of Ms can increase the porosity; as such, the chances of internal water movement are increased, and therefore, shrinkage decreases due to the presence of sufficient moisture in the specimen. On the other hand, the increase of Ms can accelerate the hydration rate of alkali activated materials and increase shrinkage. Therefore, the shrinkage strain decreased and then increased with an increase of Ms at 28 d.
Figure 2d shows that as the content of expander increased, the shrinkage strain decreased gradually at 28 d. When the content of expander was 3%, 6% and 9%, the shrinkage strain accounted for 56.2%, 48.8% and 42.7%, respectively, of that of the specimen without expander at 28 d. The addition of expander promotes the formation of new substances to produce volume expansion which compensates for shrinkage deformation, improves the pore structure of AAGC, refines the size of the pores, and thus, reduces shrinkage.

3.3. Microscopic Analysis of Alkali-Activated Green Concrete

3.3.1. SEM Analysis

The G1, G8 and G12 samples, cured for 28 d, were selected for SEM analysis. As shown in Figure 3, after the hydration of the cementitious material, AAGC produced a large number of hydration products, including needle-like and massive, clustered particles comprising hydration products. However, unhydrated substances could still be seen under high-power SEM, and a small number of microcracks with different widths and lengths were observed.
In G1, i.e., pure slag without expander, a small number of micro cracks could be seen. In G8, i.e., mixed with a small amount of fly ash and expander, the structure was more dense, the number of cracks was significantly reduced, and there were more hydration products. In G12, i.e., with more fly ash and without expander, many additives were not hydrated. Additionally, at a magnification of 1000 times, wide cracks could clearly be seen, and the particles did not form a whole, as hydrated gel products and unreacted particles cannot bond tightly together, giving rise to a loose structure.

3.3.2. XRD Analysis

Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of G1, G8 and G12. It can be seen that the three groups of AAGC had characteristic diffraction peaks of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), indicating that the main product of AAGC hydration was a C-S-H gel. A little calcite (CaCO3) was found in G1, indicating that the specimen had undergone a slight carbonation reaction during the molding hydration process. The reason for this was that the content of CaO in pure slag alkali activated cementitious materials was high, which led to the carbonation of the generated Ca(OH)2. The diffraction peak intensity of G8 was weaker than that of G1 because of the addition of fly ash. The hydration diffraction peak of G12 was significantly weaker than those of G1 and G8. It can be seen that with an increase of the content of fly ash, crystallization of hydration products gradually decreased. The reason for this is that the activity of fly ash is lower than that of slag, and its hydration rate is lower. Over time, the strength of AAGC could be improved by further hydration at a later stage. The main hydration product of AAGC is C-S-H gel with small amounts of Ca/Si. There is a small amount of C-A-S-H gel with low Ca/(Si + Al) in fly ash and slag systems.

3.3.3. MIP Analysis

The pore size distributions of G1, G8 and G12 are shown in Figure 5. The volume content of pores smaller than 50 nm in the three groups of samples was significantly more than that of pores larger than 50 nm. Compared with G1 and G8, it can be seen that the addition of expander reduced the porosity of AAGC and improved the pore size distribution and pore structure characteristics. This was due to the hydration products in the expander filling the internal pores, thereby reducing the porosity and improving the aperture distribution.

4. Conclusions

Based on experimental research and a theoretical analysis, the following conclusions were obtained:
(1)
With an increase of fly ash content, the compressive strength of AAGC gradually decreased. The decline in compressive strength at 28 d was smaller than that at 7 d. As the content of fly ash increased from 0 to 45%, the compressive strength of the AAGC at 7 d and 28 d decreased from 48.3 to 35.3 MPa and from 58.0 to 42.1 MPa, respectively. With an increase of sol ratio, the compressive strength increased and then decreased at both 7 d and 28 d. When the sol ratio was 0.42, the compressive strength reached the maximum at 28 d; the same was true for compressive strength at 7 d. When the Ms increased, the compressive strength first increased and then decreased at 7 d and 28 d. When the Ms was 1.4, the compressive strength reached the maximum at 28 d. Finally, the compressive strength of AAGC decreased with an increase of expander content at 7 d and 28 d.
(2)
As the content of fly ash increased, the shrinkage strain of AAGC increased gradually at 28 d. The shrinkage strain showed no obvious change when the content was more than 30%. The shrinkage strain could be reduced with an increase of sol ratio at 28 d. When the sol ratio was 0.46, the shrinkage strain reached the minimum at 28 d. With an increase of Ms, the shrinkage strain of AAGC first decreased and then increased at 28 d. When Ms was 1.2, the shrinkage strain reached the minimum at 28 d. Finally, as the content of expander increased, the shrinkage strain decreased gradually at 28 d.
(3)
When a small amount of fly ash and expander were added to AAGC, there were more hydration products, and the extent internal micro-cracks was significantly reduced. The AAGC only mixed with fly ash contained many unhydrated particles, and the structure was loose. The main hydration product of AAGC was found to be C-S-H gel. There were some carbonation reactions in AAGC without fly ash, and crystallization decreased with an increase of fly ash content. The addition of fly ash greatly reduced the porosity, as did the addition of expander. In addition, the proportion of small hole volume increased, while that of large hole volume decreased.

Author Contributions

S.X.: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Investigation, Methodology, Writing-original draft; P.G.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision; L.H.: Formal analysis, Data Curation; L.T.: Conceptualization, Visualization; X.G.: Conceptualization, Resources; L.W.: Data curation, Visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908285), Jiangsu Province Postdoctoral Research Funding Program (2021K576C), Jiangsu Province Construction System Science and Technology Project (2019ZD096, 2019ZD093), General Project of Natural Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (19KJD220002), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200429), Traffic Construction in Tongling (20210023), Hua She in Yancheng (KFB21498), 2021 Key Project of Natural Science of Yangzhou Polytechnic Institute (2021xjzk001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Duxson, P.; Provis, J.L.; Lukey, G.C.; Van Deventer, J.S. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of green concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1590–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van Deventer, J.S.; Provis, J.L.; Duxson, P. Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement. Miner. Eng. 2012, 29, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Davidovits, J. Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 1989, 35, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vasconcelos, E.; Fernandes, S.; De Aguiar, J.B.; Pacheco-Torgal, F. Concrete retrofitting using metakaolin geopolymer mortars and CFRP. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 3213–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Flowerday, A.C.J.; Wright, P.N.H.; Ledger, R.O.; Gibson, A.G. Investigation into the use of geopolymers for fire resistant marine composites. In RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects International Conference-Advanced Marine Materials and Coatings; Newcastle University: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar, B.S.C.; Ramesh, K. An experimental study on metakaolin and GGBS based geopolymer concrete. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2017, 9, 544–557. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fan, F.; Liu, Z.; Xu, G.; Peng, H.; Cai, C.S. Mechanical and thermal properties of fly ash based geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 160, 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sofi, M.; Van Deventer, J.S.J.; Mendis, P.A.; Lukey, G.C. Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 37, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, S.; Ma, C.; Long, G.; Xie, Y. A novel non-Portland cementitious material: Mechanical properties, durability and characterization. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 238, 117671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, T.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, Z. Influence of fly ash on the pore structure and shrinkage characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer pastes and mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 153, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hardjito, D.; Wallah, S.E.; Sumajouw, D.M.; Rangan, B.V. On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater. J. 2004, 101, 467–472. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chi, M. Effects of dosage of alkali-activated solution and curing conditions on the properties and durability of alkali-activated slag concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 35, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, N.K.; Jang, J.G.; Lee, H.K. Shrinkage characteristics of alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste and mortar at early ages. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 53, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jia, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z. Hydration products, internal relative humidity and drying shrinkage of alkali activated slag mortar with expansion agents. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 158, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, X.; Tang, D.; Yang, K.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Pan, Q.; Yang, C. Effect of Ca(OH)2 on shrinkage characteristics and microstructures of alkali-activated slag concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 175, 467–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deb, P.S.; Nath, P.; Sarker, P.K. Drying Shrinkage of Slag Blended Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete Cured at Room Temperature. Procedia Eng. 2015, 125, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Un, C.H.; Sanjayan, J.G.; San Nicolas, R.; Van Deventer, J.S.J. Predictions of long-term deflection of geopolymer concrete beams. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 94, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mastali, M.; Kinnunen, P.; Dalvand, A.; Firouz, R.M.; Illikainen, M. Drying shrinkage in alkali-activated blinders-a critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 190, 533–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, X.; Yu, Q.L.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Assessing the porosity and shrinkage of alkali activated slag-fly ash composites designed applying a packing model. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 119, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yuan, B.; Yu, Q.L.; Dainese, E.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Autogenous and drying shrinkage of sodium carbonate active slag altered by limestone power incorporation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 153, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, Y.; Ye, G. The shrinkage of alkali activated fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 68, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, X.H.; Chen, W.; Lu, Z.A.; Chen, H. Shrinkage compensation of alkali-activated slag concrete and microstructural analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 66, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kuenzel, C.; Vandeperre, L.J.; Donatello, S.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Cheeseman, C. Ambient Temperature Drying Shrinkage and Cracking in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95, 3270–3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lloyd, N.; Rangan, B. Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies 2010, Ancone, Italy, 28–30 June 2010; pp. 1493–1504. [Google Scholar]
  25. Auqui, N.U.; Baykara, H.; Rigail, A.; Cornejo, M.H.; Villalba, J.L. An investigation of the effect of migratory type corrosion inhibitor on mechanical properties of zeolite-based novel geopolymers. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1146, 814–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vidal, L.; Joussein, E.; Colas, M.; Absi, J.; Rossignol, S. Effect of the addition of ammonium molybdate on metakaolin-based geopolymer formation: Shrinkage and crystallization. Powder Technol. 2015, 275, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yip, C.K.; Provis, J.L.; Lukey, G.C.; van Deventer, J.S. Carbonate mineral addition to metakaolin-based geopolymers. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2008, 30, 979–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gevaudan, J.P.; Campbell, K.M.; Kane, T.J.; Shoemaker, R.K.; Srubar, W.V., III. Mineralization dynamics of metakaolin-based alkali-activated cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 94, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parthiban, K.; Saravana Raja Mohan, K. Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on the engineering and durability properties of alkali activated slag concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 133, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Albitar, M.; Ali, M.M.; Visintin, P.; Drechsler, M. Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 136, 374–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ban, C.C.; Ken, P.W.; Ramli, M. Mechanical and Durability Performance of Novel Self-activating Geopolymer Mortars. Procedia Eng. 2017, 171, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Luhar, S.; Cheng, T.W.; Nicolaides, D.; Luhar, I.; Panias, D.; Sakkas, K. Valorisation of glass wastes for the development of geopolymer composites—Durability, thermal and microstructural properties: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 222, 673–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The effect of different factors on the compressive strength of AAGC: (a) Fly ash (b) Sol ratio (c) Modulus and (d) Expander.
Figure 1. The effect of different factors on the compressive strength of AAGC: (a) Fly ash (b) Sol ratio (c) Modulus and (d) Expander.
Materials 15 05984 g001
Figure 2. Influence of shrinkage strain under standard curing (a) Fly ash (b) Sol ratio (c) Modulus (d) Expander.
Figure 2. Influence of shrinkage strain under standard curing (a) Fly ash (b) Sol ratio (c) Modulus (d) Expander.
Materials 15 05984 g002
Figure 3. SEM image of specimens after standard curing for 28 d. (a) G1. (b) G8. (c) G12.
Figure 3. SEM image of specimens after standard curing for 28 d. (a) G1. (b) G8. (c) G12.
Materials 15 05984 g003
Figure 4. XRD spectrum after standard curing for 28 d.
Figure 4. XRD spectrum after standard curing for 28 d.
Materials 15 05984 g004
Figure 5. Pore size distribution curve after 28 d of standard curing: (a) Pore size distribution curve; (b) Porosity; (c) Pore proportion.
Figure 5. Pore size distribution curve after 28 d of standard curing: (a) Pore size distribution curve; (b) Porosity; (c) Pore proportion.
Materials 15 05984 g005
Table 1. Chemical composition of slag and fly ash (%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of slag and fly ash (%).
MaterialsCaOSiO2Al2O3MgOSO3TiO2Fe2O3MnOOthers
Slag43.2629.3216.787.041.710.880.550.46-
Fly ash5.6553.2132.361.582.23-2.87-2.1
Table 2. Properties of water glass.
Table 2. Properties of water glass.
TargetModulusBaume DegreeDensitySiO2 (%)Na2O (%)Insoluble (%)Iron Content (%)
Value3.1–3.439.2–40.21.368–1.394≥26≥8.2≤0.2≤0.02
Table 3. Properties and composition of calcium oxide expansion agent.
Table 3. Properties and composition of calcium oxide expansion agent.
Component (%)Setting Time (min)
CaOSieving ResidueHumidityAlkali ContentClInitial SetIinal Set
≥98≤0.50≤0.40≤0.20≤0.03165350
Table 4. Orthogonal test factor levels.
Table 4. Orthogonal test factor levels.
NO.Fly Ash Content (FA%)Sol Ratio (S/C)Modulus (Ms)Expander (EA%)
100.401.00
2150.421.23
3300.441.46
4450.461.69
Table 5. AAGC mix ratios (kg/m3).
Table 5. AAGC mix ratios (kg/m3).
NO.Fly Ash (kg/m3)Slag (kg/m3)Alkali Solution (kg/m3)Modulus (Ms)Expander (kg/m3)Sand (kg/m3)Gravel (kg/m3)
G104001601.007161074
G204001681.2127161074
G304001761.4247161074
G404001841.6367161074
G5603401601.4247161074
G6603401681.6367161074
G7603401761.007161074
G8603401841.2127161074
G91202801601.6367161074
G101202801681.4247161074
G111202801761.2127161074
G121202801841.007161074
G131802201601.2127161074
G141802201681.007161074
G151802201761.6367161074
G161802201841.4247161074
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, S.; Gao, P.; Huang, L.; Tang, L.; Gu, X.; Wang, L. Experimental Research on Mechanical and Shrinkage Properties of Alkali Activated Low-Carbon Green Concrete. Materials 2022, 15, 5984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175984

AMA Style

Xu S, Gao P, Huang L, Tang L, Gu X, Wang L. Experimental Research on Mechanical and Shrinkage Properties of Alkali Activated Low-Carbon Green Concrete. Materials. 2022; 15(17):5984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Shaoyun, Peiwei Gao, Lingling Huang, Longlong Tang, Xingqing Gu, and Limin Wang. 2022. "Experimental Research on Mechanical and Shrinkage Properties of Alkali Activated Low-Carbon Green Concrete" Materials 15, no. 17: 5984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop