Next Article in Journal
Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Based on TiO2 Anode Thin Film with Three-Dimensional Web-like Structure
Next Article in Special Issue
Self-Aligned Liquid Crystals on Anisotropic Nano/Microstructured Lanthanum Yttrium Strontium Oxide Layer
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Nanoindentation Behavior of HAZ on Glass Material Machined via ECSM Process through Simulation Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Types of Microparticles on Vibration Reducibility of Cementitious Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Supercritical CO2-Induced Evolution of Alkali-Activated Slag Cements

1
Department of Civil Engineering, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Korea
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Korea
3
Mineral Processing & Metallurgy Research Center, Resources Utilization Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, 124 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34132, Korea
4
Device Solutions, Samsung Electronics, 1 Samsungjeonja-ro, Hwaseong-si 18448, Korea
5
School of Civil, Architectural Engineering& Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon 16419, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(17), 5873; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175873
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 25 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Materials Science and Engineering in Korea 2022)

Abstract

:
The phase changes in alkali-activated slag samples when exposed to supercritical carbonation were evaluated. Ground granulated blast furnace slag was activated with five different activators. The NaOH, Na2SiO3, CaO, Na2SO4, and MgO were used as activators. C-S-H is identified as the main reaction product in all samples along with other minor reaction products. The X-ray diffractograms showed the complete decalcification of C-S-H and the formation of CaCO3 polymorphs such as calcite, aragonite, and vaterite. The thermal decomposition of carbonated samples indicates a broader range of CO2 decomposition. Formation of highly cross-linked aluminosilicate gel and a reduction in unreacted slag content upon carbonation is observed through 29Si and 27Al NMR spectroscopy. The observations indicate complete decalcification of C-S-H with formation of highly cross-linked aluminosilicates upon sCO2 carbonation. A 20–30% CO2 consumption per reacted slag under supercritical conditions is observed.

1. Introduction

Portland cement (PC) production is energy intensive and emission intensive; therefore, developing alternate binders with fewer emissions is being explored. Profound investigations are being carried out on alkali-activated slag (AAS) by virtue of its associated low carbon footprint. The AAS binders can produce high mechanical strength, low permeability [1,2,3], and better chemical resistance [4,5,6,7]. The potential of an alternate binder to use as a structural material is comprehensively determined by its mechanical and durability properties. The key role played by carbonation in material degradation accentuates the detailed understanding of carbonation mechanisms. The extent of carbonation in AAS is primarily dependent on the type of activator, CO2 concentration, and curing conditions [8,9].
The carbonation rates of alkali-activated slag under service conditions are relatively slow and are comparable to PC [10,11,12]. Several other works have reported higher carbonation in AAS compared to PC as measured from accelerated carbonation tests [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Puertas et al. [20] reported a 3- and 10-fold higher carbonation depth in slag activated with NaOH and waterglass, respectively, compared to PC under saturated CO2 conditions. While Law et al. [21] reported a 3.5-fold higher carbonation in AAS compared to PC at 20% CO2. Bernal et al. [22] observed aggressive carbonation in AAS when exposed to 7% CO2. Song et al. [13] reported a decrease in carbonation depths with an increase in Na2O content. In another study with 8% Na2O, a lower carbonation rate compared to PC was observed by Blim and Atis [14]. A reduction in the carbonation degree was attributed to an associated decrease in porosity and refined pore structure with higher alkalinity [15], while few others have attributed this phenomenon to the enrichment of C-A-S-H with Na+, thereby reducing the susceptibility to carbonation [1,23]. Several works have observed the dependence of carbonation rates on the nature of activating solution used in the preparation of alkali-activated slag. Puertas et al. [20] and Ye et al. [24] observed a higher carbonation depth in waterglass activated systems compared to NaOH-activated systems. When slag is activated with sodium silicate coupled with NaOH, the carbonation depths decrease with an increase in Na2O content at constant silica modulus [13,14,17]. The degree of carbonation was observed to decrease with an increase in silica modulus at a constant Na2O content [15,25]. The presence of MgO has a positive effect on the reduction in the degree of carbonation. With the increase in MgO content, the depth of carbonation has decreased [26,27,28,29]. The presence of MgO has been observed to facilitate a CO2 absorption mechanism thereby reducing the carbonation susceptibility of AAS; however, the MgO content in slag is present in fewer quantities.
The carbonation in PC primarily occurs in pore solution and primarily decalcifies the Ca(OH)2 into CaCO3. The CaCO3 thus formed acts as a diffusion barrier inhibiting the further ingress of CO2 and carbonation [20]. Alkali-activated slag systems, unlike PC, do not have Ca(OH)2 and hence decalcification directly happens in C-S-H [20,30,31]. The disparate carbonation mechanism involved in PC and AAS has exacted the AAS to become more vulnerable to carbonation. This disparity further widens when the samples are subjected to high concentrations of CO2 where the degree of carbonation is highly overestimated [15,22,32].
The carbonation of PC when subjected to high concentrations of CO2, especially at supercritical concentrations is very rapid [33,34]. The powdered samples subjected to supercritical carbon dioxide were observed to reach their full carbonation within 24 h [35]. The mechanism was reported to be different from accelerated testing. When PC is exposed to flowing supercritical CO2 (sCO2), the CaCO3 is precipitated over the Ca(OH)2 crystals limiting its contribution to carbonation and therefore carbonation advances through decalcification of C-S-H [36]. However, in another study, the CaCO3 coating is observed to be present in a non-passivating form and hence carbonation is not arrested [37]. The carbonation of Ca(OH)2 is observed to form predominantly calcite [36], the formation of different phases is also observed in PC subjected to supercritical CO2 [35,38].
The response of PC to sCO2 is understood to a certain extent; however, information regarding the structural evolution of AAS exposed to sCO2 is highly limited. The studies on carbonation of alkali-activated slag are majorly restricted to sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate-activated slags. An understanding of the effect of carbonation on slag especially under supercritical CO2 conditions activated with different types of activators is limited. The structural changes in AAS subjected to carbonation enable us to assess the extent of carbonation and CO2 uptake in supercritical conditions. The main focus of the current work is to comprehend the phase changes in AAS systems exposed to sCO2. Slag was activated with five different activators and exposed to sCO2. The sCO2 exposed samples were characterized with XRD, TGA, 29Si, and 27Al-NMR spectroscopy techniques. The carbonated samples were then compared with uncarbonated samples to assess the phase changes and gel characteristics upon carbonation.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Materials and Sample Preparation

The X-ray fluorescence chemical composition of the slag (supplied by Chemius Korea, Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) used in this study is shown in Table 1. NaOH, Na2SiO3, Na2SO4, MgO, and CaO were used as alkali-activators. Alkali-activated slag samples were synthesized at a constant activator dosage of 10 g per 100 g of slag. All samples had an equivalent amount of added water with a powder-to-water ratio of 0.45 based on the dried mass of the materials. The fresh paste samples were poured into a vial, which was placed in a vessel for applying elevated temperature and pressure. The samples were cured in a simulated brine condition to mimic the geologic CO2 sequestration conditions by saturating in 1M NaCl solution at 50 °C and an elevated pressure of 10 MPa for 28 days. Note that the samples were removed from the vials to be exposed to brine after 1 day. N2 was pumped into the vessel to maintain the pressure during this period. After 28 days the samples were exposed to sCO2 by supplying CO2 gas into the vessel for another 28 days. The samples were obtained and solvent-exchanged using isopropanol for reaction stoppage before and after exposure to sCO2.

2.2. Test Methods

The samples were characterized with X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and 29Si and 27Al magic angle-spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) spectroscopy. X-ray diffractograms were obtained using an X’Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical) operating at 30 mA and 40 kV. The powder samples were scanned at a step size of 0.026 °2θ. The thermogravimetric analysis was conducted using a TA Instruments Q600 instrument (PH407) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min in N2. Solid-state 29Si and 27Al MAS NMR experiments were conducted using an Avance III HD instrument (9.4 T, Bruker, Billica, MA, USA) at 79.51 and 104.29 MHz, respectively. A pulse length of 1.6 µs, a spinning rate of 11 kHz, and a repetition delay of 20 s were employed for 29Si MAS NMR experiments, while a pulse length of 1.2 µs, a spinning rate of 14 kHz, and a repetition delay of 2 s were employed for 27Al MAS NMR experiments. The chemical shifts were referenced to an external TMS and aqueous AlCl3 at 0 ppm, respectively. The deconvolution of 29Si MAS NMR spectra was conducted using Origin 2020 by introducing Gaussian components at the positions where the relevant sites are known to resonate as reported in previous studies [11,28,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].

3. Results

3.1. X-ray Diffraction Results

The X-ray diffractograms of samples activated with different activating solutions before exposure to sCO2 are shown in Figure 1a–e. Each figure contains the diffractograms of the samples before and after being subjected to sCO2. The diffractogram of samples before carbonation shows a prominent peak around 29° 2θ irrespective of the activators. The peak at 29° 2θ corresponds to the reflections of poorly crystalline C-S-H with Al incorporation [46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. While the relative position of prominent reflection of C-S-H is similar in all samples prior to carbonation, there are subtle changes in its intensity. The reflection corresponding to C-S-H at approximately 7° 2θ which is prominent in NaOH-activated slag (Figure 1a) has a reduced intensity in Na2SiO3-activated slag and does not show any intensity in samples activated with other activators. The reduction in the intensity was observed with an increase in Al incorporation into C-S-H [50,53].
The diffractograms of samples activated with NaOH, Na2SiO3, and MgO consist of peaks corresponding to hydrotalcite, and the presence of katoite was observed in the diffractograms of NaOH- and Na2SO4-activated samples. In Na2SO4-activated systems, the phases corresponding to sulfates such as ettringite and thenardite are observed. The presence of sulfates in the activator resulted in the formation of ettringite which is otherwise a rare phase in an alkali-activated slag system [54]. The presence of thenardite indicates the unreacted Na2SO4 present in the activated system as similarly reported in a previous study [55]. Portlandite reflections are detected in samples activated with CaO. The presence of excess calcium resulted in the precipitation of portlandite in smaller quantities. AFm phases were also formed and are prominently visible in CaO-activated systems, while trace quantities are observed in all other activated systems except the Na2SO4-activated system.
The samples subjected to sCO2 do not exhibit any reflections corresponding to C-S-H. The peaks corresponding to the reflections of calcium carbonate polymorphs were clearly visible in sCO2-subjected samples; however, the relative intensities differ in samples activated with different activators. The peaks conforming to hydrotalcite are visible in sCO2 samples but of lower intensity compared to that of samples before carbonation. In NaOH-activated slag after sCO2 exposure, the calcite reflections are strongly visible followed by almost equivalent vaterite and aragonite forms. The formation of aragonite and calcite are prominently observed along with trace quantities of vaterite in carbonated Na2SiO3-activated slag. Reflections corresponding to gypsum are visible prominently in carbonated samples of Na2SO4-activated slag. Carbonation of ettringite in presence of H2O is known to result in the formation of gypsum [56,57]. Aragonite is the predominant carbonate phase present in Na2SO4-activated slag, while the calcite is observed in trace quantities and the vaterite is absent. Calcite is the primary carbonate phase formed in the CaO-activated slag followed by aragonite. Vaterite is present in trace quantities. Aragonite is the only CaCO3 polymorph present in the MgO-activated slag. A new peak at approximately 31° 2θ is prominently visible which shows some structural similarities with Ca-dolomite and may have been resulted from the dosage of MgO. Reflections corresponding to halite are present in a few sCO2-subjected samples, and that can be attributed to the possible precipitation of halite in some samples in the presence of brine solution employed for curing.

3.2. TGA Results

The mass loss measurements of slag activated with different activators before and after being subjected to carbonation by sCO2 are shown in Figure 2. The differential residual mass is also presented in the same figures. The sample before carbonation has a major mass loss of up to 600 °C due to dehydration of C-S-H along with the minor hydration products. There is a major mass loss due to dehydration from 50 to 200 °C and continued gradual mass loss afterward. The mass loss between 50 to 200 °C is primarily from dehydration of C-S-H. There is no discernable mass loss after 600 °C in uncarbonated samples. The small peak in DTG between 300 and 400 °C in NaOH-activated slag corresponds to the water loss from katoite and hydrotalcite decomposition. Noticeable DTG peaks after 250 °C were not present in Na2SiO3-activated slag, suggesting no other major phases are present apart from C-S-H. Ettringite present in Na2SO4-activated samples has a mass loss peak at approximately 100 °C; however, no distinguished peak is present as its mass loss is strongly overlapped with C-S-H. The mass loss peak observed between 300–400 °C in the uncarbonated MgO-activated slag sample is caused by the dihydroxylation and decarbonation of hydrotalcite [58,59].
In the samples after being subjected to sCO2, there is a rapid mass loss up to 200 °C; however, the loss is lower than that of the samples before carbonation in NaOH and Na2SiO3-activated slag. The lower mass loss of up to 200 °C in sCO2-subjected samples indicates the higher bound water in hydrates of uncarbonated samples of NaOH and Na2SiO3. A small mass loss between 500 to 600 °C corresponds to early decarbonation of carbonates in alkali-activated samples [28,45]. The prominent mass loss peak in sCO2-subjected samples is visible at 700 °C, which is ascribed to the decomposition of the CaCO3. The different polymorphs are converted into calcite when subjected to heating and are subjected to decomposition at similar temperatures [60,61]. The overall mass loss in carbonated samples is 12–15% higher compared to that of uncarbonated samples for any given activator type. In Na2SO4 samples exposed to sCO2, the mass loss peak between 100–150 °C is attributed to the conversion of gypsum to anhydrate via hemihydrate.

3.3. 29Si MAS NMR

The 29Si MAS NMR spectra of slag activated with different activators are shown in Figure 3. The spectra of carbonated samples are shown in dotted lines. The spectrum of NaOH-activated slag sample showed prominent resonance at −80 and −83 ppm, corresponding to the presence of the Q1(II) and Q2(1Al) sites. The spectrum also showed smaller resonance peaks at approximately 78 and 86 ppm corresponding to the Q1(I) and Q2 sites. The Q1(I) and Q1(II) differ by the charge balancing units which are charge-balanced by monovalent and divalent cations, respectively [43]. The spectrum of uncarbonated sample activated with Na2SiO3 appear similar to that of NaOH-activated slag and exhibited prominent resonance at −80, −83, and −86 ppm, corresponding to the Q1(II), Q2(1Al), and Q2 sites. The spectrum also consist of smaller resonance peaks at approximately −78 ppm corresponding to the Q1(I) site. The spectrum of uncarbonated samples of Na2SO4-activated sample is more diffused compared to the spectra of the NaOH- and Na2SiO3-activated system; however, the prominent resonance sites remain at −78, −80, −83, and −86 ppm, corresponding to the Q1(I), Q1(II), Q2(1Al) and Q2 sites. The uncarbonated samples activated with CaO and MgO also contain the resonance sites similar to the other systems, but with subtle changes in their intensities.
The prominent resonance has shifted to higher ppm and peaks at approximately –95 ppm in the samples exposed to sCO2. The resonance looks more diffused with evenly distributed coordination units. Qualitatively, it is observed that the quantity of lower coordinated bonds has decreased. The resonance at lower chemical shifts is attributed to the presence of decalcified C-A-S-H and the corresponding formation of a highly cross-linked aluminosilicate framework [27,28,45,62]. The relative trends in the resonance spectrum look similar but, there are elusive changes with change in the activator type. While the relative proportion of Q1 units is less in NaOH- and Na2SiO3-activated slag samples exposed to sCO2, the MgO-activated slag has significant units followed by CaO- and Na2SO4-activated systems.

3.4. 27Al MAS NMR

The 27Al NMR spectra of the NaOH-activated samples before and after exposure to sCO2 are shown in Figure 4. The samples which are subjected to sCO2 are shown in dotted lines. In the samples before carbonation, two prominent resonance zones are observed. The first zone extends between 80 to 50 ppm whereas the second zone spreads in between 20 to –10 ppm with a peak maximum of approximately 10 ppm. In the NaOH-activated slag, the prominent resonance is observed at 73 ppm which corresponds to the q2(II) sites of Al, coordinated with tetrahedral Si in C-A-S-H, where Si is charge-balanced with more electropositive divalent cations. The broad tail towards the lower ppm of the first resonance zone indicates the presence of q3 sites which resonate at approximately 63 ppm and corresponds to the highly cross-linked Al in C-A-S-H gel. A resonance site at 10 ppm is also observed, which corresponds to the octahedral Al sites present in layered-double hydroxide (LDH, i.e., hydrotalcite). The Na2SiO3 samples before carbonation exhibit two prominent resonance zones similar to the NaOH samples. The resonance at approximately 70 ppm consists of peaks at 73 and 68 ppm, which correspond to the q2(I) and q2(II) resonance sites of Al, coordinated with tetrahedral Si in C-A-S-H. The existence of q3 sites is indicated by the broad tail towards the lower ppm of the first resonance zone, which peaks at about 63 ppm. The resonance corresponding to the octahedral sites in LDH sites which occurs at 10 ppm is present in uncarbonated samples but is of lower magnitude compared to NaOH-activated samples indicating a reduced amount of hydrotalcite.
Uncarbonated samples of Na2SO4-activated slag have two prominent resonance zones similar to NaOH and Na2SiO3. The first resonance site peaks at approximately 60 ppm and consists of overlapped resonance sites at 63 and 58 ppm which corresponds to the q3 and q4 sites in highly cross-linked aluminosilicates. Resonance events corresponding to the lower coordination units are in small numbers indicating the C-S-H is more cross-linked compared to the NaOH and Na2SiO3 systems. The resonance at 13 ppm corresponds to the presence of Al in octahedral coordination in ettringite. In CaO-activated slag samples, a resonance site peaks at approximately 60 ppm and consists of overlapped resonance sites at 73, 68, 63, and 58 ppm which corresponds to the q2(I), q2(II), q3, and q4 sites aluminosilicates, respectively. The resonance at 8 ppm outweighs the first resonance event and it is attributed to the resonance of Al in AFm phases. The MgO-activated samples also produce resonance at similar sites of other activators; however, the resonance at 10 ppm has larger intensity and is contributed by hydrotalcite and AFm phases.
In all samples of activated slag after being exposed to sCO2, the first resonance zone has shifted to lower chemical shifts compared to the corresponding uncarbonated samples. The magnitude of the second resonance zone has decreased drastically upon carbonation. In the carbonated samples, the upfield shift is clearly visible in the first resonance zone and it peaks at 58 ppm. The upfield shift is characterized by more cross-linked aluminosilicates resulting from the decalcification of C-A-S-H. The resonance at 10 ppm diminished substantially in sCO2 subjected samples indicating the loss of octahedral sites resulting from the potential carbonation. In NaOH-activated slag, the decrease in resonance at 10 ppm can be attributed to the potential carbonation of hydrotalcite, whereas in Na2SiO3- and MgO-activated samples, the same has resulted due to the carbonation of hydrotalcite and AFm phases available in trace quantities. In the Na2SO4-activated system carbonation of ettringite resulted in the loss of octahedral resonance sites. The decrease in the intensity of resonance at 13 ppm in sCO2 subjected CaO-activated samples indicates the destabilization of Afm phases and related phase changes upon carbonation.

3.5. Discussion

The 29Si NMR spectra were deconvoluted using multiple Gaussian peaks and the area under each peak is shown in Table 2. The table also contains the area contributed by the resonance of unreacted slag. The area contributed by the unreacted slag in the uncarbonated Na2SO4-activated sample is about 75%, which indicates the reaction degree of the slag in Na2SO4-activated samples is very low. The CaO- and MgO-activated samples consist of ~65% unreacted slag whereas the area of reacted slag has reached about 50% in NaOH- and Na2SiO3-activated slags [63]. The area contribution from slag has reduced drastically upon carbonation. The amount of unreacted slag in carbonated samples is highest in MgO-activated samples with 28% while NaOH and Na2SiO3 have a minimal amount of unreacted slag in carbonated samples. The carbonated Na2SO4- and CaO-activated samples have 21% unreacted slag. The percentage reduction in unreacted slag upon carbonation is least for MgO-activated samples, followed by CaO and Na2SO4 samples, whereas NaOH and Na2SiO3 have the highest percentage change in unreacted slag upon carbonation.
The uncarbonated NaOH slag system has a majority of Q1(II) sites indicating the formation of C-S-H, while the Na2SiO3 system has Q2(1Al) sites indicating significant Al incorporation into C-S-H. The peak at approximately 7° 2θ in the X-ray diffractogram which is prominently visible in NaOH-activated sample has a reduced intensity in Na2SiO3 samples. The peak was observed to decrease with an increase in Al/Si ratio in the reaction products [50,53]. The uncarbonated CaO and MgO also have high Q2(1Al) units indicating the formation of C-S-H with Al incorporation. The area under Q3 and Q4 sites with varying Al coordination are very less in uncarbonated samples whereas the corresponding areas in carbonated samples have increased regardless of the activator type. This indicates the formation of highly cross-linked aluminosilicates upon carbonation. The structural changes in C-A-S-H gel to higher cross-linked aluminosilicates are previously observed [24,31,45].
The mass loss curves for all samples are shown in Figure 5. In the uncarbonated samples, the mass loss in NaOH and Na2SiO3 is very high up to 600 °C whereas Na2SO4-activated samples have the least mass loss up to 600 °C. The mass loss corresponding to bound water in C-S-H majorly occurs from 50 to 150 °C and a gradual loss up to 600 °C [64]. The mass loss due to katoite, hydrotalcite, and AFM happens within 600 °C [44,65]. The mass loss results up to 600 °C followed an inverse trend as that of the area contributions from unreacted slag in NMR. The NMR results indicate a higher reacted slag content in NaOH and Na2SiO3 systems. The higher reacted slag results in the formation of larger amounts of C-S-H which holds more water in bound form and hence results in a higher mass loss upon heating up to 600 °C. The reaction product in Na2SO4 is likely to be in lower quantities owing to the lower extent of slag dissolution and ensued a reduced mass loss. The NMR suggests a similar amount of reacted slag in both CaO- and MgO-activated samples; however, the mass loss in CaO-activated samples is slightly higher, which can be ascribed to the precipitation of portlandite and Afm phases in the presence of excess CaO that is supplied as the activator [66]. The carbonated samples exhibit a similar mass loss up to 400 °C irrespective of the activator type. The water uptake by C-S-H depends on the Ca/Si ratio and increases with Ca/Si ratio. The presence of aluminum also tends to increase water uptake in C-S-H [67]. The Q1, Q2, and Q3 resonance sites in NMR of carbonated samples are nominally equal and the dehydroxylation of hydroxyl ions attached to these sites might have resulted in a similar mass loss up to 400 °C in all carbonated samples. The mass loss beyond 400 °C in carbonated samples is higher in NaOH-activated samples while it is the least for Na2SO4-activated samples.
The mass of CO2 released upon heating in the carbonated samples is estimated by calculating the area of the peak corresponding to the decarbonation under the differential mass loss diagram in Table 3. The tangential approach is employed in area calculations to eliminate the mass contributions due to other phases [68]. The mass of CO2 thus calculated was further normalized with the quantity of slag in the carbonated sample. The table shows the normalized mass percentage of CO2 released upon heating in carbonated samples. The mass of CO2 released per slag upon heating is minimum in Na2SO4-activated mixes while it is maximum for NaOH samples. The CO2 uptake can be better understood when it is compared with reacted slag. Table 3 also shows the mass percentage of CO2 normalized to reacted slag quantity. Upon normalization to reacted slag also, the Na2SO4-activated system has a lower CO2 release. The lower extent of slag reaction and preferential precipitation of gypsum limited the amount of calcium available for the formation of calcium carbonates. CaO- and MgO-activated samples have the highest uptake of CO2 per reacted slag. The formation of calcium carbonates and magnesium carbonates in presence of Ca- and Mg-based activators, respectively, apart from decalcification of C-S-H have contributed to carbonates [69]. MgO present in the alkali-activated slag was reported to decrease the carbonation [26,27,28,29] whereas when MgO is supplied as an activator resulted in higher contents of CO2. NaOH-activated samples have the highest CO2 uptake per reacted slag content subsequent to CaO- and MgO-activated systems. The higher degree of reaction in NaOH samples and direct decalcification of C-S-H resulted in higher carbonation [15,70]. Na2SiO3-activated mixes have an intermediate rate of carbonation with CO2 contents. Despite having a similar extent of slag reaction, as indicated from NMR compared to NaOH-activated samples, the Na2SiO3 samples exhibited a lower carbonation rate. This can be attributed to the lower porosity and dense pore structure in Na2SiO3-activated systems [15,70].

4. Conclusions

The phase transformations and carbonation behavior of alkali-activated slag exposed to sCO2 were investigated. The key observations are presented here.
(1)
C-S-H with varying degrees of Al incorporation commonly detected in alkali-activated slag systems is observed as the prominent reaction product regardless of the type of activators used in the study.
(2)
C-S-H is not observed in the carbonated samples suggesting its complete carbonation. The CaCO3 polymorphs such as calcite, aragonite, and vaterite are observed as carbonation products upon exposure to sCO2. The relative proportions of different CaCO3 polymorphs differed with the change in activator type.
(3)
The unreacted slag content decreased drastically with carbonation. About 20–30 g of CO2/100 g of reacted slag was consumed for the carbonation of alkali-activated slag samples in sCO2 conditions.
(4)
The extent of carbonation per reacted slag based on the activator is as follows CaO > MgO > NaOH > Na2SiO3 > Na2SO4. The higher C-S-H contents in NaOH-activated slag and the additional carbonation phases resulting from the carbonation of activator in CaO- and MgO-activated slag systems resulted in higher CO2 contents.
(5)
A decrease in Q1, Q2 sites and a corresponding increase in the quantity of Q3 and Q4 units were observed in AAS samples when subjected to sCO2, indicating the formation of a highly cross-linked aluminosilicates upon carbonation for all types of activators considered in the study. The formation of highly cross-linked aluminosilicates was also reported previously.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C.R., S.K. and S.P. (Solmoi Park); data curation, J.S., S.K., G.M.K. and S.P. (Solmoi Park); formal analysis, K.C.R., H.N.Y. and S.P. (Seunghee Park); funding acquisition, S.P. (Solmoi Park); investigation, J.S. and H.N.Y.; methodology, K.C.R., J.S., H.N.Y., G.M.K. and H.M.S.; project administration, S.P. (Solmoi Park); supervision, H.M.S. and S.P. (Solmoi Park); writing—original draft, K.C.R.; writing—review and editing, J.S., H.N.Y., S.K., G.M.K., H.M.S., S.P. (Seunghee Park) and S.P. (Solmoi Park). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (IO211203-09223-01), the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2021R1A4A3033128), and Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government (MOTIE) (No. 20212010200080, in situ carbonation technology development using CO2 emissions from cement industry).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L.; Rose, V.; De Gutierrez, R.M. Evolution of binder structure in sodium silicate-activated slag-metakaolin blends. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bernal, S.A.; de Gutiérrez, R.M.; Pedraza, A.L.; Provis, J.L.; Rodriguez, E.D.; Delvasto, S. Effect of binder content on the performance of alkali-activated slag concretes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. de Azevedo, A.R.; Cruz, A.S.; Marvila, M.T.; de Oliveira, L.B.; Monteiro, S.N.; Vieira, C.M.F.; Fediuk, R.; Timokhin, R.; Vatin, N.; Daironas, M. Natural Fibers as an Alternative to Synthetic Fibers in Reinforcement of Geopolymer Matrices: A Comparative Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Puertas, F.; Gutierrez, R.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Delvasto, S.; Maldonado, J. Alkaline cement mortars. Chemical resistance to sulfate and seawater attack. Mater. Constr. 2002, 52, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bakharev, T.; Sanjayan, J.G.; Cheng, Y.-B. Resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete to acid attack. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 1607–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Runci, A.; Serdar, M. Effect of curing time on the chloride diffusion of alkali-activated slag. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abdel-Gawwad, H.A.; Sikora, P.; Mohammed, A.H.; Arif, M.A.; Al-Kroom, H.; Elrahman, M.A. Resistance of alkali-activated slag mixed with wastewater towards biogenic sulfuric acid attack. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 17, e01164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J.; Shi, C.; Zhang, Z.; Ou, Z. Durability of alkali-activated materials in aggressive environments: A review on recent studies. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 152, 598–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Provis, J.L. Alkali-activated materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, H.; Provis, J.L.; van Deventer, J.S.J.; Krivenko, P.V. Characterization of Aged Slag Concretes. ACI Mater. J. 2008, 105, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bernal, S.A.; San Nicolas, R.; Provis, J.L.; De Gutiérrez, R.M.; van Deventer, J.S. Natural carbonation of aged alkali-activated slag concretes. Mater. Struct. 2014, 47, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shi, C.; Roy, D.; Krivenko, P. Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  13. Song, K.-I.; Song, J.-K.; Lee, B.Y.; Yang, K.-H. Carbonation characteristics of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag mortar. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 2014, 326458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bilim, C.; Atiş, C.D. Alkali activation of mortars containing different replacement levels of ground granulated blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 708–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shi, Z.; Shi, C.; Wan, S.; Li, N.; Zhang, Z. Effect of alkali dosage and silicate modulus on carbonation of alkali-activated slag mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 113, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Byfors, K.; Klingstedt, G.; Lehtonen, V.; Pyy, H.; Romben, L. Durability of Concrete Made with Alkali-Activated Slag. Int. Concr. Abstr. Portal 1989, 114, 1429–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-Otaibi, S. Durability of concrete incorporating GGBS activated by water-glass. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rashad, A.M. A synopsis of carbonation of alkali-activated materials. Green Mater. 2019, 7, 118–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, X.; Long, K.; Liu, W.; Li, L.; Long, W.-J. Carbonation and Chloride Ions’ Penetration of Alkali-Activated Materials: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Puertas, F.; Palacios, M.; Vázquez, T. Carbonation process of alkali-activated slag mortars. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 3071–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Law, D.W.; Adam, A.A.; Molyneaux, T.K.; Patnaikuni, I. Durability assessment of alkali activated slag (AAS) concrete. Mater. Struct. 2012, 45, 1425–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L.; Brice, D.G.; Kilcullen, A.; Duxson, P.; van Deventer, J.S. Accelerated carbonation testing of alkali-activated binders significantly underestimates service life: The role of pore solution chemistry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nedeljković, M.; Ghiassi, B.; van der Laan, S.; Li, Z.; Ye, G. Effect of curing conditions on the pore solution and carbonation resistance of alkali-activated fly ash and slag pastes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 116, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ye, H.; Cai, R.; Tian, Z. Natural carbonation-induced phase and molecular evolution of alkali-activated slag: Effect of activator composition and curing temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 248, 118726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bernal, S.A.; de Gutierrez, R.M.; Provis, J.L.; Rose, V. Effect of silicate modulus and metakaolin incorporation on the carbonation of alkali silicate-activated slags. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 898–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, N.K.; Koh, K.T.; Kim, M.O.; An, G.H.; Ryu, G.S. Physicochemical changes caused by reactive MgO in alkali-activated fly ash/slag blends under accelerated carbonation. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 12490–12496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bernal, S.A.; San Nicolas, R.; Myers, R.J.; de Gutiérrez, R.M.; Puertas, F.; van Deventer, J.S.; Provis, J.L. MgO content of slag controls phase evolution and structural changes induced by accelerated carbonation in alkali-activated binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 57, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Park, S.M.; Jang, J.G.; Lee, H.K. Unlocking the role of MgO in the carbonation of alkali-activated slag cement. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McCaslin, E.R.; White, C.E. A parametric study of accelerated carbonation in alkali-activated slag. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 145, 106454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Palacios, M.; Puertas, F. Effect of Carbonation on Alkali-Activated Slag Paste. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 3211–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nguyen, T.N.; Phung, Q.T.; Yu, Z.; Frederickx, L.; Jacques, D.; Sakellariou, D.; Dauzeres, A.; Elsen, J.; Pontikes, Y. Alteration in molecular structure of alkali activated slag with various water to binder ratios under accelerated carbonation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, J.; Shumuye, E.D.; Wang, Z.; Bezabih, G.A. Performance of GGBS Cement Concrete under Natural Carbonation and Accelerated Carbonation Exposure. J. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6659768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Barlet-Gouedard, V.; Rimmele, G.; Goffe, B.; Porcherie, O. Mitigation strategies for the risk of CO2 migration through wellbores. In Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Miami, FL, USA, 21–23 February 2006. [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas, D.C.; Benson, S.M. Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations-Results from the CO2 Capture Project: Vol 2-Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and Verification; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. Park, S.; Moon, H.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, M.; Chung, C.-W. Reaction of hydrated cement paste with supercritical carbon dioxide. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 281, 122615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. García-González, C.A.; el Grouh, N.; Hidalgo, A.; Fraile, J.; López-Periago, A.M.; Andrade, C.; Domingo, C. New insights on the use of supercritical carbon dioxide for the accelerated carbonation of cement pastes. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2008, 43, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vance, K.; Falzone, G.; Pignatelli, I.; Bauchy, M.; Balonis, M.; Sant, G. Direct Carbonation of Ca(OH)2 Using Liquid and Supercritical CO2: Implications for Carbon-Neutral Cementation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 8908–8918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Short, N.R.; Purnell, P.; Page, C.L. Preliminary investigations into the supercritical carbonation of cement pastes. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 36, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Park, S.; Park, H.M.; Yoon, H.; Seo, J.; Yang, C.-M.; Provis, J.L.; Yang, B. Hydration kinetics and products of MgO-activated blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 249, 118700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, S.M.; Jang, J. Carbonation-induced weathering effect on cesium retention of cement paste. J. Nucl. Mater. 2018, 505, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Seo, J.; Park, S.M.; Lee, H.-K. Evolution of the binder gel in carbonation-cured Portland cement in an acidic medium. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 109, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yoon, H.N.; Seo, J.; Kim, S.; Lee, H.K.; Park, S. Characterization of blast furnace slag-blended Portland cement for immobilization of Co. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 134, 106089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Myers, R.; Bernal, S.A.; Gehman, J.D.; Van Deventer, J.S.J.; Provis, J.L. The Role of Al in Cross-Linking of Alkali-Activated Slag Cements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 996–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Myers, R.J.; L’Hôpital, E.; Provis, J.L.; Lothenbach, B. Effect of temperature and aluminium on calcium (alumino)silicate hydrate chemistry under equilibrium conditions. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 68, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L.; Walkley, B.; San Nicolas, R.; Gehman, J.D.; Brice, D.G.; Kilcullen, A.R.; Duxson, P.; Van Deventer, J.S. Gel nanostructure in alkali-activated binders based on slag and fly ash, and effects of accelerated carbonation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2013, 53, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Reddy, K.C.; Subramaniam, K.V.L. Quantitative phase analysis of slag hydrating in an alkaline environment. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2020, 53, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reddy, K.C.; Subramaniam, K.V.L. Blast Furnace Slag Hydration in an Alkaline Medium: Influence of Sodium Content and Sodium Hydroxide Molarity. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 04020371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zuo, Y.; Nedeljković, M.; Ye, G. Pore solution composition of alkali-activated slag/fly ash pastes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 115, 230–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ye, H.; Radlińska, A. Quantitative Analysis of Phase Assemblage and Chemical Shrinkage of Alkali-Activated Slag. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2016, 14, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Renaudin, G.; Russias, J.; Leroux, F.; Frizon, F.; Cau-dit-Coumes, C. Structural characterization of C–S–H and C–A–S–H samples—part I: Long-range order investigated by Rietveld analyses. J. Solid State Chem. 2009, 182, 3312–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Haha, M.B.; LE Saout, G.; Winnefeld, F.; Lothenbach, B. Influence of activator type on hydration kinetics, hydrate assemblage and microstructural development of alkali activated blast-furnace slags. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Garcia-Lodeiro, I.; Palomo, A.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Macphee, D. Compatibility studies between NASH and CASH gels. Study in the ternary diagram Na2O–CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ben Haha, M.; Lothenbach, B.; Le Saout, G.; Winnefeld, F. Influence of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag—Part II: Effect of Al2O3. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Myers, R.J.; Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L. Phase diagrams for alkali-activated slag binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 95, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mobasher, N.; Bernal, S.A.; Hussain, O.H.; Apperley, D.C.; Kinoshita, H.; Provis, J.L. Characterisation of Ba(OH)2–Na2SO4–blast furnace slag cement-like composites for the immobilisation of sulfate bearing nuclear wastes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 66, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hargis, C.W.; Lothenbach, B.; Müller, C.J.; Winnefeld, F. Carbonation of calcium sulfoaluminate mortars. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 80, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Seo, J.; Kim, S.; Park, S.; Yoon, H.; Lee, H. Carbonation of calcium sulfoaluminate cement blended with blast furnace slag. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 118, 103918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ke, X.; Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L. Uptake of chloride and carbonate by Mg-Al and Ca-Al layered double hydroxides in simulated pore solutions of alkali-activated slag cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 100, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hibino, T.; Yamashita, Y.; Kosuge, K.; Tsunashima, A. Decarbonation behavior of Mg-Al-CO3 hydrotalcite-like compounds during heat treatment. Clays Clay Miner. 1995, 43, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Faust, G.T. Differentiation of Aragonite from Calcite by Differential Thermal Analysis. Science 1949, 110, 402–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Maciejewski, M.; Oswald, H.-R.; Reller, A. Thermal transformations of vaterite and calcite. Thermochim. Acta 1994, 234, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ke, X.; Criado, M.; Provis, J.L.; Bernal, S.A. Slag-Based Cements That Resist Damage Induced by Carbon Dioxide. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5067–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zheng, D.; Ji, T.; Wang, G. Effect of CaO on the Autogenous Shrinkage of Alkali-Activated Slag Mortar. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 9918834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Barzgar, S.; Tarik, M.; Ludwig, C.; Lothenbach, B. The effect of equilibration time on Al uptake in C-S-H. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 144, 106438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gruskovnjak, A.; Lothenbach, B.; Holzer, L.; Figi, R.; Winnefeld, F. Hydration of alkali-activated slag: Comparison with ordinary Portland cement. Adv. Cem. Res. 2006, 18, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kim, M.S.; Jun, Y.; Lee, C.; Oh, J.E. Use of CaO as an activator for producing a price-competitive non-cement structural binder using ground granulated blast furnace slag. Cem. Concr. Res. 2013, 54, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. L’Hôpital, E.; Lothenbach, B.; Kulik, D.; Scrivener, K. Influence of calcium to silica ratio on aluminium uptake in calcium silicate hydrate. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 85, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Scrivener, K.; Snellings, R.; Lothenbach, B. A Practical Guide to Microstructural Analysis of Cementitious Materials; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gardeh, M.G.; Kistanov, A.A.; Nguyen, H.; Manzano, H.; Cao, W.; Kinnunen, P. Exploring Mechanisms of Hydration and Carbonation of MgO and Mg(OH)2 in Reactive Magnesium Oxide-Based Cements. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 6196–6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kim, G.M.; Jang, J.; Naeem, F.; Lee, H.K. Heavy Metal Leaching, CO2 Uptake and Mechanical Characteristics of Carbonated Porous Concrete with Alkali-Activated Slag and Bottom Ash. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2015, 9, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Diffractograms of activated slag before and after being exposed to sCO2. (a) NaOH (b) Na2SiO3 (c) Na2SO4 (d) CaO (e) MgO. Samples exposed to sCO2 are stacked on top and are represented with a grey color. (*—C-S-H, A—AFm Phases, E—ettringite, G—gypsum, H—hydrotalcite, K—katoite, P—portlandite, S—strätlingite, a—aragonite, c—calcite, h—halite, p—periclase, t—thenardite, v—vaterite, d—dolomite).
Figure 1. Diffractograms of activated slag before and after being exposed to sCO2. (a) NaOH (b) Na2SiO3 (c) Na2SO4 (d) CaO (e) MgO. Samples exposed to sCO2 are stacked on top and are represented with a grey color. (*—C-S-H, A—AFm Phases, E—ettringite, G—gypsum, H—hydrotalcite, K—katoite, P—portlandite, S—strätlingite, a—aragonite, c—calcite, h—halite, p—periclase, t—thenardite, v—vaterite, d—dolomite).
Materials 15 05873 g001aMaterials 15 05873 g001bMaterials 15 05873 g001c
Figure 2. TG/DTG curves of activated slag before and after being exposed to sCO2. (a) NaOH (b) Na2SiO3 (c) Na2SO4 (d) CaO (e) MgO. The dotted lines are for the samples exposed to sCO2.
Figure 2. TG/DTG curves of activated slag before and after being exposed to sCO2. (a) NaOH (b) Na2SiO3 (c) Na2SO4 (d) CaO (e) MgO. The dotted lines are for the samples exposed to sCO2.
Materials 15 05873 g002aMaterials 15 05873 g002bMaterials 15 05873 g002c
Figure 3. 29Si MAS NMR spectra of activated slag before and after being exposed to sCO2. (a) NaOH (b) Na2SiO3 (c) Na2SO4 (d) CaO (e) MgO. The samples exposed to sCO2 are shown in dotted lines.
Figure 3. 29Si MAS NMR spectra of activated slag before and after being exposed to sCO2. (a) NaOH (b) Na2SiO3 (c) Na2SO4 (d) CaO (e) MgO. The samples exposed to sCO2 are shown in dotted lines.
Materials 15 05873 g003
Figure 4. 27Al MAS NMR spectra of activated slag before and after being exposed to sCO2. (a) NaOH (b) Na2SiO3 (c) Na2SO4 (d) CaO (e) MgO. The samples exposed to sCO2 are shown in dotted lines.
Figure 4. 27Al MAS NMR spectra of activated slag before and after being exposed to sCO2. (a) NaOH (b) Na2SiO3 (c) Na2SO4 (d) CaO (e) MgO. The samples exposed to sCO2 are shown in dotted lines.
Materials 15 05873 g004aMaterials 15 05873 g004b
Figure 5. Residual mass curves of alkali-activated slag samples: (a) carbonated and (b) uncarbonated.
Figure 5. Residual mass curves of alkali-activated slag samples: (a) carbonated and (b) uncarbonated.
Materials 15 05873 g005
Table 1. Chemical composition of blast furnace slag (mass-%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of blast furnace slag (mass-%).
CaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MgONa2OK2OSO3TiO2P2O5Mn2O3SrOLOI *
43.6136.1814.150.313.460.220.530.370.670.020.370.070.03
* Loss on ignition, determined in accordance with ASTM C114.
Table 2. 29Si MAS NMR deconvolution results.
Table 2. 29Si MAS NMR deconvolution results.
ComponentSlagQ0Q1(I)Q1(II)Q2(1Al)Q2Q3(1Al)/Q4(4Al)Q3/Q4(3Al)Q4(2Al)Q4
Position−74−78−80−83−86−89−93−100−107
NaOH49.40.01.924.114.78.81.10.0
NaOH-sC10.31.72.23.77.8 10.826.734.91.9
Na2SiO349.30.01.96.322.712.74.03.2
Na2SiO3-sC7.63.34.13.5 7.28.220.238.47.5
Na2SO475.40.00.41.74.812.75.00.0
Na2SO4-sC21.52.60.75.0 6.27.425.227.73.7
CaO65.80.00.64.517.96.92.51.8
CaO-sC20.72.01.13.2 8.07.915.435.46.3
MgO63.80.50.92.715.88.05.43.1
MgO-sC27.93.31.35.6 9.07.118.321.16.4
Table 3. CO2 uptake of alkali-activated slag samples (g/100 g).
Table 3. CO2 uptake of alkali-activated slag samples (g/100 g).
NaOHNa2SiO3Na2SO4CaOMgO
CO2/slag23.4918.6214.8820.2617.36
CO2/reacted slag27.9921.0321.2629.9929.84
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reddy, K.C.; Seo, J.; Yoon, H.N.; Kim, S.; Kim, G.M.; Son, H.M.; Park, S.; Park, S. Supercritical CO2-Induced Evolution of Alkali-Activated Slag Cements. Materials 2022, 15, 5873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175873

AMA Style

Reddy KC, Seo J, Yoon HN, Kim S, Kim GM, Son HM, Park S, Park S. Supercritical CO2-Induced Evolution of Alkali-Activated Slag Cements. Materials. 2022; 15(17):5873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reddy, Kamasani Chiranjeevi, Joonho Seo, H. N. Yoon, Seonhyeok Kim, G. M. Kim, H. M. Son, Seunghee Park, and Solmoi Park. 2022. "Supercritical CO2-Induced Evolution of Alkali-Activated Slag Cements" Materials 15, no. 17: 5873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop