Next Article in Journal
Early-Age Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Mortar with Spent Garnet
Previous Article in Journal
A Method of Predicting Wear and Damage of Pantograph Sliding Strips Based on Artificial Neural Networks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/ma15010103
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First-Principles Density Functional Theory Study of Modified Germanene-Based Electrode Materials

by
Xue Si
1,
Weihan She
1,
Qiang Xu
2,
Guangmin Yang
1,*,
Zhuo Li
1,
Siqi Wang
1 and
Jingfei Luan
1,3,*
1
School of Physics, Changchun Normal University, Changchun 130032, China
2
School of Prospecting and Surveying, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130021, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(1), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010103
Submission received: 29 October 2021 / Revised: 16 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 23 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic First-Principles Simulation—Nano-Theory)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Germanene, with a wrinkled atomic layer structure and high specific surface area, showed high potential as an electrode material for supercapacitors. According to the first-principles calculation based on Density Functional Theory, the quantum capacitance of germanene could be significantly improved by introducing doping/co-doping, vacancy defects and multilayered structures. The quantum capacitance obtained enhancement as a result of the generation of localized states near the Dirac point and/or the movement of the Fermi level induced by doping and/or defects. In addition, it was found that the quantum capacitance enhanced monotonically with the increase of the defect concentration.

1. Introduction

With the progress of science and technology in modern society, energy shortage is becoming increasingly serious. For example, some fossil fuels are already in short supply. Therefore, the search for recyclable and regenerable energy sources is imminently needed. The development of high-performance electrical energy storage devices, such as rechargeable batteries and electrochemical capacitors [1,2], has become a research hotspot. The electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] have the advantages of a simple charging circuit, long life, and high output power [11], but low energy density. Thus, the efficient supercapacitors should have an electrochemically stable electrode-electrolyte interface with high specific surface/interface area to enhance the energy density. Researchers are constantly trying to explore new electrode materials or modify existing materials to improve the performance of supercapacitors [12].
Graphene is a typical two-dimensional electrode material [13,14]. However, graphene exhibits certain drawbacks in the application process, such as poor accessibility to the electrolyte [13,15]. Hence, it is particularly important to find new two-dimensional materials.
Doping and functionalization are the usual methods to improve the capacitance of graphene [16]. As two-dimensional layered nanosheet materials, silicene and germanene have attracted attention due to the inspiration of graphene. As far as spin-orbit interaction (SOI) was concerned, germanene was more prominent than silicene and graphene, the SOI of germanene, silicene and graphene were 46.3 meV, 4 meV and 1 μeV, respectively [17,18,19]. The large spin-orbit gap (24 meV) of germanene made it a typical alternative material for exhibiting the Quantum Spin Hall Effect [20,21,22]. Furthermore, germanene was easier to be functionalized and had been synthesized by different chemical methods [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Thus, germanene had become a major competitor in the EDLCs electrode materials.
Recent experimental and theoretical results had shown that the total interface capacitance (CT) in supercapacitors is affected by both the quantum capacitance (CQ) and electric double layer (CD) capacitance [29,30,31]. The increase of quantum capacitance is an effective method for improving the total interface capacitance. However, the CQ of germanene-based electrodes materials for supercapacitors has not been fully studied. In the application process and/or growth conditions, the introduction of vacancy defects [32,33,34], doping/co-doping [35,36,37,38,39,40,41], and adsorbents [42,43] could alter the electronic structure, thereby affecting the quantum capacitance. Furthermore, the randomness of defects/doping had an influence on the electronic and transport properties, for example, edge defects have an effect on the transport gap [44,45]. We will expand this content in the next study. In the previous work, we studied different types of vacancy defects and metal atoms adsorbed on single-vacancy germanene. However, there were few studies on the adsorption of pristine germanene, concentration effects and co-doping. Therefore, this paper explored CQ of pristine or defected germanene with monolayer/multilayer structures on the basis of Density Functional Theory. At the same time, the influence of defect concentration on the quantum capacitance was discussed. The calculation results indicated that both vacancies and doping/co-doping could improve the quantum capacitance. According to these results, we analyzed the reasons for the performance enhancement of electrode materials with different defect structures.

2. Materials and Methods

All the calculations were performed by the PAW (Projector Augmented Wave) potential [46] method on the basis of DFT as implemented in the VASP code [47]. The generalized gradient approximation with the parametrization of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) [48] is used to express the electron exchange correlation energy of the interaction [49]. The calculation of the PBE generalized function was found to be reliable by Zhu et al. [50]. To ensure that the total energy converges to 1 meV/atom, the k-space integral and plane-wave basis were chosen [51]. It was found that the kinetic energy cut-off value of plane wave expansion was 450 eV, which had significant influence. The Monkhorst–Pack method was used to sample K-points in the Brillouin zone [49]. The spin was also considered in the calculation process.
Through sp3/sp2-hybridization, the lattice constant of the buckled honeycomb structure of pristine germanene was 4.061 Å. According to our calculations, the Ge-Ge bond length was found to be 2.443 Å, which was similar to the previous studies [52,53]. Based on the pristine cell containing two atoms, the article established different supercells as ideal models, including 2 × 2 (containing 8 atoms), 3 × 3 (containing 18 atoms), 4 × 4 (containing 32 atoms), 5 × 5 (containing 50 atoms) and 6 × 6 (containing 72 atoms) hexagonal structures. We calculated the effects of metallic atoms Ti, Au, Ag, Cu, Al and non-metallic atoms B, N, P, S on quantum capacitance.
To avoid layer-to-layer interaction, we chose a vacuum space of 18 Å in the supercell. The Brillouin zones of 2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, 5 × 5 and 6 × 6 supercells were sampled with a Γ-centered k-point grid of 24 × 24, 16 × 16, 12 × 12, 10 × 10, 6 × 6, respectively.
The CQ can be expressed as CQ = dσ/dΦ, where dσ and dΦ represent the charge density and local potential, respectively. According to the formula μ = eΦ, the electrochemical potential μF can move rigidly through the local potential Φ. On the electrode, the excess charge density can be expressed as the Equation (1) [54]:
Δ Q = ∫ − ∞ + ∞ D ( E ) [ f ( E ) − f ( E − e Φ ) ] d E
in which D(E) represents the density of states (DOS), and f(E) represents the Fermi–Dirac distribution function. E is the relative energy of the Fermi level EF. According to the analytical Formula (1) of ΔQ, the quantum capacitance CQ can be calculated using Equation (2) [54,55]:
C Q = e 2 ∫ − ∞ + ∞ D ( E ) F T ( E − e Φ ) d E
in which FT(E) represents the thermal broadening function, which can be described as the Equation (3):
F T ( E ) = ( 4 k B T ) − 1 S e c h 2 ( E / 2 k B T )
kB is the Boltzmann constant, and the room temperature was set at 300 K.
The formation energies of single-vacancy germanene, double-vacancy germanene, and triple-B (N, P, S) atoms doped with single-vacancy germanene were calculated using the following Formulas (4)–(6):
Δ E S V ( x ) = E S V - G e r ( x ) − ( n − 1 ) μ G e
Δ E D V ( x ) = E D V - G e r ( x ) − ( n − 2 ) μ G e
Δ E 3 - B ( N , P , S ) = E S V - G e r - 3 B ( N , P , S ) − ( n − 3 ) μ G e − 3 μ B ( N , P , S )
Among them, ESV-Ger, EDV-Ger, ESV-Ger-3B(N, P, S) represent the total energy of single/double-vacancy germanene, and single-vacancy germanene doped with triple-B (N, P, S) atoms, respectively. μGe and μB (N, P, S) are the energy of the single Ge atom in pristine germanene and B12 (N2, P4, S8) molecules in the gas phase, respectively, and n is the total number of atoms in pristine germanene.
The adsorption energy of the metal atoms (Ti, Au, Ag, Cu and Al) on pristine germanene was calculated by the following Formula (7):
Δ E a d = E G e r - m − n μ G e − μ m
in which EGer-m is the energy of metal atoms adsorbed on germanene and μm is the energy of a single metal atom.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows the formation energy of single-vacancy germanene doped with triple-B (N, P, S) atoms at a doping concentration of 9.4%. The formation energies of B, N, P and S doped with single-vacancy germanene were 8.684 eV, 5.256 eV, 0.575 eV and −6.149 eV, respectively. Triple-S atoms doped had the lowest formation energy, which indicates that it is a stable doping structure. The S atom could be used as an ideal doping atom for germanene-based electrode materials. In addition, N, P and S were better dopants than B. We could see that the dopants of N2, P4 and S8 as reference states were easier than the B-doping with B12.
Figure 1b shows the adsorption energy of Ti, Au, Ag, Cu and Al atoms at the most stable position of pristine germanene, with the adsorption concentration of 3.1%. In this study, the adsorption energies of the most stable adsorption sites for Ti, Au, Ag, Cu and Al were calculated to be −4.144 eV, −2.113 eV, −1.650 eV, −2.489 eV and −2.716 eV, respectively. The adsorption of germanene had four typical sites, which had stable or metastable binding with atoms, namely hill, valley, bridge and hollow sites in Figure 1b. It was found that the most stable positions of Ti, Au, Ag and Cu were hollow sites, however, the most stable position was the valley site for Al. According to the structural models, it could be concluded that the adsorbed atoms cause local deformation of the germanene layer. The Cu and Au atoms were totally embedded in the germanene and the Ge atoms in the next layer were pushed downward from the original positions. For instance, the distance between the adsorbed Cu atom and Ge atom in the next layer changed from 2.5 Å to 1.034 Å. Figure 1c shows the formation energy of single(double)-vacancy germanene, and single-vacancy germanene doped with triple-N and S atoms at different concentrations. The formation energy of single-vacancy was high because of the destruction of the Ge-Ge bond. For single-vacancy germanene, the formation energy increased and then decreased with the increase of defect concentration. The formation energies of double-vacancy germanene and single-vacancy germanene doped with triple-N or S atoms also had the same trend. The formation energy of triple-N doped with single-vacancy germanene was almost constant because the binding force between N and Ge atom was very strong and the energy was released, it had good stability.
The electronic performance of defective germanene with the fully relaxed structure are shown in Figure 2. The significant characteristic of the six-fold or three-fold symmetric band structures could be expressed by the high symmetry lines of the Brillouin zone along Γ-K-M-Γ. The Figure shows the band structures and density of states of the four defect structures. As shown in Figure 2a,c, the Fermi level moved down because the band gaps were opened by the defects. Their band gaps were 0.08 eV and 0.39 eV, respectively. For the double-vacancy germanene in Figure 2b, the band gap near the Fermi level was zero. As shown in Figure 2d, the adsorption of Ti leaded to spin polarization. The symmetry of spin-up and spin-down was destroyed near the Fermi level, and the asymmetric density of states caused by Ti-3d orbit. The band gap at the Dirac point was open, and local defect states were formed in the band gap. It could be observed that the all the four defect structures introduced local states near the Fermi level, and the peaks corresponded to the partial flattening of the bands.
Figure 3a shows the effect of triple-B (N, P, S) doped with single-vacancy germanene on the quantum capacitance. The quantum capacitance of pristine germanene was approximately zero when the local potential (Φ) was 0 V. Moreover, it had the same trend on both sides of the Fermi level. It was due to the linear dispersion near the Dirac point. For single-vacancy germanene doped with B, N, P and S atoms, the local maximum values of quantum capacitance were 37.0 μF/cm2 (−0.024 V), 97.2 μF/cm2 (0.072 V), 40.3 μF/cm2 (0.12 V) and 48.6 μF/cm2 (0.024 V), respectively. Therefore, the quantum capacitance of germanene was significantly improved by the dopants. It was ascribed to the localized state produced by dopants and single vacancy near the Dirac point. To understand the local state near the Fermi energy of the doped atoms, we studied the effect of temperature on CQ in Figure 3b. We set the temperature range from 0 K to 400 K and calculated the CQ with zero bias. The quantum capacitance of pristine germanene remained almost unchanged, close to 1.97 µF/cm2. The quantum capacitance of single-vacancy germanene doped with B, N, P and S atoms also did not change significantly with temperature. The weak change of CQ with temperature was connected to the density of states near the Fermi level. According to the calculated charge accumulation effect in Figure 3c,d, the charge accumulation of single-vacancy germanene doped with N, P greatly increased under the positive potential. Both B and S had an obvious enhancement effect under the negative potential.
Figure 4a shows the calculated quantum capacitance of the pristine germanene adsorbed metal atoms at the most stable configuration. For the adsorption of Ti, Au, Ag, Cu and Al on pristine germanene, the local maximum values of the CQ near 0 V were 62.0 μF/cm2 (0.024 V), 58.4 μF/cm2 (−0.048 V), 53.7 μF/cm2 (−0.144 V), 77.1 μF/cm2 (−0.432 V), and 61.8 μF/cm2 (−0.120 V), respectively. The quantum capacitance of the germanene observably increased with adsorption of metal atoms. Among these metal atoms, the adsorption effects of Ti, Au and Al were better than Ag and Cu.
Figure 4b shows the relationship between the quantum capacitance and temperature. The quantum capacitance of pristine germanene adsorbed metal atoms did not change significantly with temperature. Figure 4c,d show the surface charge density versus the potential drop of pristine germanene adsorbed different metal atoms, with a potential range of −0.6–0.6 V. The charge accumulation was obvious under the positive potential for Ti and the negative potential for Ag and Cu. The CQ of metal-adsorbed germanene changed with the increase of electrode potential, which indicated that the DOS also varied with the potential. According to the formula 1/CT = 1/CD + 1/CQ, the total interface capacitance changed with the quantum capacitance. Pristine germanene had a low quantum capacitance at a small potential, which significantly affected the total interface capacitance. The improvement of quantum capacitance was obtained by the adsorption of metal atoms, and it significantly improved the total interface capacitance.
Figure 5 shows the quantum capacitance and the surface charge density versus the potential drop for the five defect structures with different concentrations, at the potential range of −0.6–0.6 V. In Figure 5a, when the single-vacancy concentration was 5.6%, the quantum capacitance was 97.6 μF/cm2 at −0.168 V. The charge accumulation effect was obviously enhanced under the positive and negative bias. The phenomenon was caused by the increase of effective states near the Fermi level. As the concentration of double-vacancy germanene raised from 4% to 25% in Figure 5b, the local peak value of the quantum capacitance raised from 27.4 μF/cm2 (−0.168 V) to 116.6 μF/cm2 (−0.240 V). The charge accumulation increased under the positive and negative potential. It was observed that the disappearance of dangling bonds around the vacancy means that the localized states were introduced by double-vacancy at the low concentration near the Fermi level.
Figure 5c,d show the CQ and surface charge density of single-vacancy germanene doped with triple-N and S atoms. When the concentration raised from 6% to 37.5%, the peak value of the quantum capacitance increased from 58.7 μF/cm2 (0.144 V) to 168.3 μF/cm2 (0.408 V) for triple-N doping and increased from 45.1 μF/cm2 (0 V) to 120.5 μF/cm2 (0.120 V) for triple-S doping. The increase of the local states leaded to the enhanced quantum capacitance at a small voltage. N-doping had the best charge accumulation effect under the positive potential, while S-doping had it under the negative potential.
As shown in Figure 5e, when the concentration raised from 2% to 8.3%, the maximum value of the quantum capacitance changed from 53.9 μF/cm2 (0.096 V) to 125.9 μF/cm2 (−0.408 V). In contrast to pristine germanene, the low concentration of Ti-doping didn’t significantly affect the electronic structure of germanene. As the Ti concentration increased, these defective states widened above the Fermi level owing to the coupling of the defective states, thus resulting in an increase of the quantum capacitance. As the Ti concentration increased, the charge accumulation effect improved irrespective of positive and negative potential. This was because of the formation of a peak in the density of states at low concentrations near the Fermi level.
For the N/S co-doping system with different ratios, including 3:0 (NNN-doping), 2:1 (NNS co-doping), 1:2 (NSS co-doping), and 0:3 (SSS-doping), the CQ and surface charge density vs. Φ were shown in Figure 6. It was apparent that all the CQ values were better than that of pristine germanene in Figure 6a. With the variation of N/S ratios, the peak of CQ raised from 48.6 μF/cm2 (0.024 V) to 49.8 μF/cm2 (−0.024 V) for the NSS co-doping, 100.7 μF/cm2 (0.336 V) for the NNS co-doping and to 97.2 μF/cm2 (0.072 V) for the NNN-doping. Figure 6b shows the relationship between quantum capacitance and temperature. The quantum capacitance of N/S co-doped with single-vacancy germanene didn’t change significantly with temperature. The surface charge density was clearly better than that of pristine germanene in Figure 6c,d. For the NNN-doping, the surface charge density increased under the positive potential. The trend of surface charge density of NSS co-doping was similar to that of SSS-doping, and they showed a monotonous increasing trend under the negative potential.
We also explored the effect of NAl, NNAl, NPAl and NSAl co-doped with single-vacancy germanene on CQ. They all introduced localized states near the Fermi level. N was one of the most common elements to regulate the physicochemical properties of germanene. With the introduction of N atoms, the hybrid states of Al atom tended to be consistent. Moreover, some studies had shown that replacing the atoms around the metal with N atoms could further stabilize the metal atoms at the defect site, thereby exhibiting higher chemical activity [56]. The optimized structure models, the corresponding band structures and the total DOS were shown in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9. For NNAl and NPAl co-doping, the bandgaps at the Dirac point were opened, the bandgaps were 0.120 eV and 0.124 eV, respectively. The Fermi level shifted down to the valence zone. The results show that NNAl and NPAl co-doping were more conductive than NAl and NSAl co-doping, which was consistent with the DOS in Figure 9. The quantum capacitance of single-vacancy germanene co-doped with N/P/S/Al atoms was shown in Figure 9b. For the NAl, NNAl, NPAl and NSAl co-doping, the local maximum values of the CQ were 21.4 μF/cm2 (−0.168 V), 18.5 μF/cm2 (0.024 V), 19.8 μF/cm2 (0 V), 24.0 μF/cm2 (0.168 V), respectively. Evidently, the high quantum capacitance was attributed to the localized states near the Fermi level [57]. This demonstrated that the co-doped with single vacancy could ameliorate the CQ of pristine germanene. Figure 9c represents the surface charge density versus Φ. The charge accumulation exhibited an enormous improvement for NNAl co-doping with the positive potential.
The majority of theoretical and experimental studies had focused on the monolayer germanene due to its simplicity. However, the understanding of the modified properties due to interaction between layers occurred in multilayer structures was also important in supercapacitor electrode application [58]. This work researched structures, stability, electronic properties and CQ of multilayer germanene to clearly understand the properties of modified germanene under the interaction with germanene layers. Therefore, we modified the multilayered structures of NAl, NNAl, NPAl and NSAl co-doped with germanene. The optimized structures were shown in Figure 10. The CQ and surface storage charge of the pristine/single-vacancy and four kinds of multilayer germanene were contained in Figure 11b,c. For quantum capacitance of multilayer structures co-doped with NAl, NNAl, NPAl and NSAl system, the local maximum values were 39.1 μF/cm2 (−0.336 V), 54.6 μF/cm2 (−0.260 V), 42.8 μF/cm2 (−0.360 V) and 33.0 μF/cm2 (−0.072 V), respectively. Due to the interaction between dopants of adjacent layers, the CQ of multilayer was better than that of monolayer structures. The charge accumulation was enhanced at the positive potential for NPAl co-doping, and NNAl co-doping had the best charge accumulation effect under the negative potential.

4. Conclusions

The effects of doping/co-doping, vacancy defects and multilayered structures on the electronic structure and quantum capacitance of germanene were studied by first-principles calculations. The adsorption of Ti, Au, Ag, Cu and Al on pristine germanene were also examined.
The results show that the doping of B, N, P and S atoms and the adsorption of metal atoms significantly improved the quantum capacitance of germanene. It was found that these ways remarkably alter the band by introducing localized states and/or Fermi level shifts near the Dirac point. Analysis of the doping effect of triple-B (N, P, S) with single-vacancy germanene on the quantum capacitance shows that triple-N doping could significantly improve the quantum capacitance of germanene. Secondly, the structures of pristine germanene adsorbed metal atoms were modified, the calculated CQ values suggested that the adsorbed Ti and Al atoms systems had the best performance. Thirdly, we also found that as the defect concentration increased, the quantum capacitance showed a monotonic increase. Both NNN-doping and NNS co-doping had obvious effect on the improvement of quantum capacitance. Finally, we modified the monolayer and multilayer structures of germanene co-doped with NAl, NNAl, NPAl and NSAl. The results indicated that the interaction between layers increased the quantum capacitance. Therefore, vacancies and doping play a momentous part in improving the quantum capacitance of germanene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.S. and G.Y.; methodology, X.S. and W.S.; software, X.S., Z.L. and J.L.; validation, X.S., S.W. and Q.X.; formal analysis, X.S. and Q.X.; investigation, X.S. and S.W.; resources, G.Y.; data curation, X.S. and W.S.; writing—original draft preparation, X.S.; writing—review and editing, X.S., G.Y. and J.L.; visualization, X.S. and Z.L.; supervision, G.Y.; funding acquisition, X.S., Q.X., G.Y. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Guangmin Yang would like to acknowledge the support by the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (Grant No. YDZJ202101ZYTS158), the 13th Five-year Planning Project of Jilin Provincial Education Department Foundation (Grant No. JJKH20200828 KJ), the Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 001010) of Changchun Normal University. Qiang Xu would like to acknowledge the support by the Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 320190005) of Changchun Institute of Technology. Xue Si would like to acknowledge the support by No. 053[2020] of the Graduate Scientific Research Project of Changchun Normal University (SGSRPCNU). Jingfei Luan would like to acknowledge the support by the Project Funded for Innovational and Enterprising Talents of Department of and Social Security of Jilin Province of China (Grant No. 2020033), by the Scientific Research Planning Project of the Education Department of Jilin Province of China (Grant No. JJKH20200832KJ), by the Scientific and Technical Innovation Leading Personnel and Team Foundation for Middle-aged and Young Scientist of Science and Technology Bureau of Jilin Province of China (Grant No. 20200301033RQ), by the Free Exploring Key Item of Natural Science Fundation of Science and Technology Bureau of Jilin Province of China (Grant No. YDZJ202101ZYTS161), by the Industrial Technology Research and Development Fund of Jilin Province Capital Development Fund on Budget in 2021 of Jilin Province Development and Reform Commission of China (Grant No. 2021C037-1), by Natural Science Foundation of Changchun Normal University (Grant No. [2019]13), by the Scientific Research Initating Foundation for Advanced Doctor of Changchun Normal University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Additionally, thanks are extended to the anonymous reviewers whose suggestions improved this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Qi, Z.; Koenig, G.M. Review article: Flow battery systems with solid electroactive materials. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2017, 35, 040801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chang, P.; Qin, Z. A novel kind of activated carbon foam electrode for electric double layer capacitors. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017, 12, 1846–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chaudoy, V.; Tran Van, F.; Deschamps, M.; Ghamouss, F. Ionic liquids in a polyethylene oxide cross-linked gel polymer as an electrolyte for electrical double layer capacitor. J. Power Sources 2017, 342, 872–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gaboriau, D.; Boniface, M.; Valero, A.; Aldakov, D.; Brousse, T.; Gentile, P.; Sadki, S. Atomic layer deposition alumina-passivated silicon nanowires: Probing the transition from electrochemical double-layer capacitor to electrolytic capacitor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 13761–13769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Murashko, K.; Nevstrueva, D.; Pihlajamäki, A.; Koiranen, T.; Pyrhönen, J. Cellulose and activated carbon based flexible electrical double-layer capacitor electrode: Preparation and characterization. Energy 2017, 119, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Parida, K.; Bhavanasi, V.; Kumar, V.; Wang, J.; Lee, P.S. Fast charging self-powered electric double layer capacitor. J. Power Sources 2017, 342, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Premathilake, D.; Outlaw, R.A.; Parler, S.G.; Butler, S.M.; Miller, J.R. Electric double layer capacitors for ac filtering made from vertically oriented graphene nanosheets on aluminum. Carbon 2017, 111, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, Y.; Chang, L.; Hu, Y. KOH-assisted microwave post-treatment of activated carbon for efficient symmetrical double-layer capacitors. Int. J. Energy Res. 2017, 41, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Bo, Z.; Hu, M.; Yan, J.; Cen, K. Molecular origin of electric double-layer capacitance at multilayer graphene edges. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J. A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 797–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wu, M.; Sun, D.; Tan, C.; Tian, X.; Huang, Y. Al-doped ZnO monolayer as a promising transparent electrode material: A first-principles study. Materials 2017, 10, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Dubonos, S.V.; Firsov, A.A. Two-dimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, S.; Zhang, C.; Ji, W.; Li, F.; Wang, P.; Hu, S.; Yan, S.; Liu, Y. Tunable electronic and magnetic properties in germanene by alkali, alkaline-earth, group III and 3rd transition metal atom adsorption. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 15968–15978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, Z.; Fang, F.; Wu, J.; Tong, X.; Zhou, Y.; Lv, Z.; Wang, J.; Sawtell, D. Interfacial chemical effects of amorphous zinc oxide/graphene. Materials 2021, 14, 2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, C.; Jiang, H.; Yao, Y. Low-energy effective hamiltonian involving spin-orbit coupling in silicene and two-dimensional germanium and tin. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 195430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kaloni, T.P. Tuning the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of germanene by the adsorption of 3d transition metal atoms. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 25200–25208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Xu, Q.; Si, X.; She, W.; Yang, G.; Fan, X.; Zheng, W. First-principles calculation of optimizing the performance of germanene-based supercapacitors by vacancies and metal atoms. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 12346–12358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nair, R.R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A.N.; Novoselov, K.S.; Booth, T.J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N.M.R.; Geim, A.K. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 2008, 320, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Zhang, L.; Bampoulis, P.; Rudenko, A.N.; Yao, Q.; Van Houselt, A.; Poelsema, B.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Zandvliet, H.J.W. Structural and electronic properties of germanene on MoS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 256804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, N.; Bo, G.; Liu, Y.; Xu, X.; Du, Y.; Dou, S. Recent progress on germanene and functionalized germanene: Preparation, characterizations, applications, and challenges. Nano. Micro Small 2019, 15, 1805147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Li, L.; Lu, S.; Pan, J.; Qin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, G.; Du, S.; Gao, H. Buckled germanene formation on Pt(111). Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4820–4824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhuang, J.; Gao, N.; Li, Z.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Dou, S.; Du, Y. Cooperative electron-phonon coupling and buckled structure in germanene on Au(111). ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3553–3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Derivaz, M.; Dentel, D.; Stephan, R.G.; Hanf, M.C.; Mehdaoui, A.; Sonnet, P.; Pirri, C. Continuous germanene layer on Al(111). Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2510–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qin, Z.; Pan, J.; Lu, S.; Shao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Du, S.; Gao, H.; Cao, G. Direct evidence of dirac signature in bilayer germanene islands on Cu(111). Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, W.; Uhrberg, R.I.G. Investigation of the atomic and electronic structures of highly ordered two-dimensional germanium on Au(111). Phys. Rev. Mater. 2017, 1, 074002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhuang, J.; Liu, C.; Zhou, Z.; Casillas, G.; Feng, H.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; Hao, W.; Wang, X.; Dou, S.; et al. Dirac signature in germanene on semiconducting substrate. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, G.; Zhang, H.; Fan, X.; Zheng, W. Density functional theory calculations for the quantum capacitance performance of graphene-based electrode material. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6464–6470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paek, E.; Pak, A.J.; Hwang, G.S. Curvature effects on the interfacial capacitance of carbon nanotubes in an ionic liquid. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 23539–23546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pak, A.J.; Paek, E.; Hwang, G.S. Relative contributions of quantum and double layer capacitance to the supercapacitor performance of carbon nanotubes in an ionic liquid. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 19741–19747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Faizan, M.; Bhamu, K.C.; Murtaza, G.; He, X.; Kulhari, N.; Al-Anazy, M.M.; Khan, S.H. Electronic and optical properties of vacancy ordered double perovskites A2BX6 (A = Rb, Cs; B = Sn, Pd, Pt; and X = Cl, Br, I): A first principles study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Momeni, M.J.; Mousavi-Khoshdel, M.; Leisegang, T. Exploring the performance of pristine and defective silicene and silicene-like XSi3 (X = Al, B, C, N, P) sheets as supercapacitor electrodes: A density functional theory calculation of quantum capacitance. Phys. E 2020, 124, 114290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, Q.; Ju, W.; Yong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, J. Quantum capacitance of supercapacitor electrodes based on germanene influenced by vacancy and co-doping: A first-principles study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2021, 188, 110131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tizroespeli, F.; Parhizgar, S.S.; Beheshtian, J.; Boochani, A. The first principle study of magnetic, electronic, and optical properties of Co-and Mn-doped boron nitride nanosheets. Indian J. Phys. 2021, 33, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, Q.; Yang, G.; Fan, X.; Zheng, W. Improving the quantum capacitance of graphene-based supercapacitors by the doping and co-doping: First-principles calculations. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 13209–13217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lahourpour, F.; Boochani, A.; Parhizgar, S.S.; Elahi, S.M. Structural, electronic and optical properties of graphene-like nano-layers MoX2(X: S,Se,Te): DFT study. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2019, 13, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhou, Q.; Ju, W.; Yong, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, J. Effect of the N/P/S, and transition-metal co-doping on the quantum capacita nce of supercapacitor electrodes based on mono-and multilayer graphene. Carbon 2020, 170, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, Q.; Ju, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, Q. Effect of coexistence of defect and dopant on the quantum capacitance of graphene-based supercapacitors electrodes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 510, 145448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mohammadi, S.; Targholi, E.; Mousavi-Khoshdel, S.M. Metal—Organic framework-derived cobalt hydroxide microparticles as supercapacitor electrode materials. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2021, 18, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gopalsamy, K.; Balamurugan, J.; Thanh, T.D.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Fabrication of nitrogen and sulfur co-doped graphene nanoribbons with porous architecture for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 312, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Faizan, M.; Xie, J.; Murtaza, G.; Echeverría-Arrondo, C.; Alshahrani, T.; Bhamu, K.C.; Laref, A.; Mora-Sero, I.; Haidar Khan, S. A first-principles study of the stability, electronic structure, and optical properties of halide double perovskite Rb2Sn1−xTexI6 for solar cell applications. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 4646–4657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cheng, J.; Wang, P.; Hua, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z. The impact of iron adsorption on the electronic and photocatalytic properties of the zinc oxide (0001) surface: A first-principles study. Materials 2018, 11, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Poljak, M.; Song, E.B.; Wang, M.; Suligoj, T.; Wang, K.L. Influence of edge defects, vacancies, and potential fluctuations on transport properties of extremely scaled graphene nanoribbons. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 2012, 59, 3231–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poljak, M. Electron mobility in defective nanoribbons of monoelemental 2D materials. IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 2020, 41, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Blöchl, P.E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953–17979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864–B871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Perdew, J.P.; Chevary, J.A.; Vosko, S.H.; Jackson, K.A.; Pederson, M.R.; Singh, D.J.; Fiolhais, C. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 6671–6687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, G.; Fan, X.; Shi, S.; Huang, H.; Zheng, W. Stability of Ptn cluster on free/defective graphene: A first-principles study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 392, 936–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhu, B.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J. First principal investigation of halogen-doped monolayer g-C3N4 photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 207, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, Q.; Yang, G.; Fan, X.; Zheng, W. Adsorption of metal atoms on silicene: Stability and quantum capacitance of silicene-based electrode materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 4276–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Garcia, J.C.; de Lima, D.B.; Assali, L.V.C.; Justo, J.F. Group IV graphene-and graphene-like nanosheets. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 13242–13246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Trivedi, S.; Srivastava, A.; Kurchania, R. Silicene and germanene: A first principle study of electronic structure and effect of hydrogenation-passivation. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2014, 11, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. John, D.L.; Castro, L.C.; Pulfrey, D.L. Quantum capacitance in nanoscale device modeling. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 5180–5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Paek, E.; Pak, A.J.; Kweon, K.E.; Hwang, G.S. On the origin of the enhanced supercapacitor performance of nitrogen-doped graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 5610–5616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, M.; Chen, L.; Zhou, J.; Xu, L.; Li, X.; Li, L.; Li, X. First-principles calculation of quantum capacitance of metals doped graphenes and nitrogen/metals co-doped graphenes: Designing strategies for supercapacitor electrodes. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, G.; Xu, Q.; Fan, X.; Zheng, W. Quantum capacitance of silicene-based electrodes from first-principles calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 1903–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hirunsit, P.; Liangruksa, M.; Khanchaitit, P. Electronic structures and quantum capacitance of monolayer and multilayer graphenes influenced by Al, B, N and P doping, and monovacancy: Theoretical study. Carbon 2016, 108, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 00103 g001 550
Figure 1. Formation energies of (a) triple-B (N, P, S) doped with single-vacancy germanene at a defect concentration of 9.4%; (b) Adsorption energies of the most stable configuration of metal atoms adsorbed on pristine germanene at a defect concentration of 3.1%, the results were obtained within the supercell 4 × 4; (c) Formation energies of single-vacancy, double-vacancy and triple-N (S) doped with single-vacancy germanene.
Figure 1. Formation energies of (a) triple-B (N, P, S) doped with single-vacancy germanene at a defect concentration of 9.4%; (b) Adsorption energies of the most stable configuration of metal atoms adsorbed on pristine germanene at a defect concentration of 3.1%, the results were obtained within the supercell 4 × 4; (c) Formation energies of single-vacancy, double-vacancy and triple-N (S) doped with single-vacancy germanene.
Materials 15 00103 g001
Materials 15 00103 g002 550
Figure 2. Atomic structures (left) of proposed germanene-based models, band structure (middle), and density of states (right) of the (a) single-vacancy, (b) double-vacancy, (c) triple-N doped with single-vacancy germanene, and (d) Ti atom adsorbed on pristine germanene with hollow site and (e) pristine germanene. The Fermi levels were indicated by the blue and horizontal dashed lines.
Figure 2. Atomic structures (left) of proposed germanene-based models, band structure (middle), and density of states (right) of the (a) single-vacancy, (b) double-vacancy, (c) triple-N doped with single-vacancy germanene, and (d) Ti atom adsorbed on pristine germanene with hollow site and (e) pristine germanene. The Fermi levels were indicated by the blue and horizontal dashed lines.
Materials 15 00103 g002
Materials 15 00103 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Calculated quantum capacitance of the triple-B (N, P, S) doped with single-vacancy germanene; (b) Change of CQ with temperatures in the scope of 0 K–400 K, the consequences gained in 4 × 4 supercell with a doping concentration of 9.4%; (c,d) Surface charge density vs. Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Figure 3. (a) Calculated quantum capacitance of the triple-B (N, P, S) doped with single-vacancy germanene; (b) Change of CQ with temperatures in the scope of 0 K–400 K, the consequences gained in 4 × 4 supercell with a doping concentration of 9.4%; (c,d) Surface charge density vs. Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Materials 15 00103 g003
Materials 15 00103 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Quantum capacitance of the pristine germanene adsorbed Ti, Au, Ag, Cu, Al at the most stable configuration; (b) Change of CQ with temperature in the scope of 0 K–400 K, the consequences gained in 4 × 4 supercell at a doping concentration of 9.4%; (c,d) Surface charge density vs. Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Figure 4. (a) Quantum capacitance of the pristine germanene adsorbed Ti, Au, Ag, Cu, Al at the most stable configuration; (b) Change of CQ with temperature in the scope of 0 K–400 K, the consequences gained in 4 × 4 supercell at a doping concentration of 9.4%; (c,d) Surface charge density vs. Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Materials 15 00103 g004
Materials 15 00103 g005 550
Figure 5. Calculated quantum capacitance (left) and surface charge density vs. potential drop (−0.6 V~0.6 V) with different concentrations of (a) single-vacancy, (b) double-vacancy, (c) triple-N doped with single-vacancy germanene, (d) triple-S doped with single-vacancy germanene and (e) pristine germanene adsorbed Ti at the most stable configuration.
Figure 5. Calculated quantum capacitance (left) and surface charge density vs. potential drop (−0.6 V~0.6 V) with different concentrations of (a) single-vacancy, (b) double-vacancy, (c) triple-N doped with single-vacancy germanene, (d) triple-S doped with single-vacancy germanene and (e) pristine germanene adsorbed Ti at the most stable configuration.
Materials 15 00103 g005
Materials 15 00103 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Calculated quantum capacitance of the N/S co-doped with single-vacancy germanene; (b) Change of CQ with temperatures in the scope of 0 K–400 K, the consequences gained in 4 × 4 supercell; (c,d) Surface charge density vs. Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Figure 6. (a) Calculated quantum capacitance of the N/S co-doped with single-vacancy germanene; (b) Change of CQ with temperatures in the scope of 0 K–400 K, the consequences gained in 4 × 4 supercell; (c,d) Surface charge density vs. Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Materials 15 00103 g006
Materials 15 00103 g007 550
Figure 7. The atomic structures of proposed germanene-based models including single-vacancy germanene co-doped with the (a) NAl, (b) NNAl, (c) NPAl and (d) NSAl.
Figure 7. The atomic structures of proposed germanene-based models including single-vacancy germanene co-doped with the (a) NAl, (b) NNAl, (c) NPAl and (d) NSAl.
Materials 15 00103 g007
Materials 15 00103 g008 550
Figure 8. The band structures of single-vacancy germanene co-doped with the (a) NAl, (b) NNAl, (c) NPAl and (d) NSAl.
Figure 8. The band structures of single-vacancy germanene co-doped with the (a) NAl, (b) NNAl, (c) NPAl and (d) NSAl.
Materials 15 00103 g008
Materials 15 00103 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Density of states (DOS) of single-vacancy germanene co-doped with N/P/S/Al; (b) Calculated quantum capacitance of the N/P/S/Al co-doped with single-vacancy germanene; (c) Surface charge density vs. Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Figure 9. (a) Density of states (DOS) of single-vacancy germanene co-doped with N/P/S/Al; (b) Calculated quantum capacitance of the N/P/S/Al co-doped with single-vacancy germanene; (c) Surface charge density vs. Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Materials 15 00103 g009
Materials 15 00103 g010 550
Figure 10. The side views for atomic multilayered structures of proposed germanene-based models including single-vacancy germanene co-doped with the (a) NAl, (b) NNAl, (c) NPAl and (d) NSAl.
Figure 10. The side views for atomic multilayered structures of proposed germanene-based models including single-vacancy germanene co-doped with the (a) NAl, (b) NNAl, (c) NPAl and (d) NSAl.
Materials 15 00103 g010
Materials 15 00103 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) Density of states (DOS) of multilayered structures of single-vacancy germanene co-doped with N/P/S/Al; (b) Calculated quantum capacitance of multilayered structures of the N/P/S/Al co-doped with single-vacancy germanene; (c) Surface charge density with Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Figure 11. (a) Density of states (DOS) of multilayered structures of single-vacancy germanene co-doped with N/P/S/Al; (b) Calculated quantum capacitance of multilayered structures of the N/P/S/Al co-doped with single-vacancy germanene; (c) Surface charge density with Φ between −0.6 V and 0.6 V.
Materials 15 00103 g011
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Si, X.; She, W.; Xu, Q.; Yang, G.; Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Luan, J. First-Principles Density Functional Theory Study of Modified Germanene-Based Electrode Materials. Materials 2022, 15, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010103

AMA Style

Si X, She W, Xu Q, Yang G, Li Z, Wang S, Luan J. First-Principles Density Functional Theory Study of Modified Germanene-Based Electrode Materials. Materials. 2022; 15(1):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Si, Xue, Weihan She, Qiang Xu, Guangmin Yang, Zhuo Li, Siqi Wang, and Jingfei Luan. 2022. "First-Principles Density Functional Theory Study of Modified Germanene-Based Electrode Materials" Materials 15, no. 1: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop