Next Article in Journal
Process Design for a Production of Sustainable Materials from Post-Production Clay
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Multiparameter Laser Stripping of AlTiN and DLC C Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transparent Glasses and Glass-Ceramics in the Ternary System TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal Evolutions to Glass-Ceramics Bearing Calcium Tungstate Crystals in Borate Glasses Doped with Photoluminescent Eu3+ Ions

1
Field of Advanced Ceramics, Department of Life Science and Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, Japan
2
Institute of Glass and Ceramics, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Martensstraße 5, DE-91058 Erlangen, Germany
3
Frontier Research Institute for Materials Science (FRIMS), Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(4), 952; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040952
Submission received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 2 February 2021 / Accepted: 10 February 2021 / Published: 18 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glass-Ceramics: Structural Investigations and Luminescence Properties)

Abstract

:
Thermal evolutions of calcium-tungstate-borate glasses were investigated for the development of luminescent glass-ceramics by using Eu3+ dopant in a borate glass matrix with calcium tungstate, which was expected to have a combined character of glass and ceramics. This study revealed that single-phase precipitation of CaWO4 crystals in borate glass matrix was possible by heat-treatment at a temperature higher than glass transition temperature Tg for (100−x) (33CaO-67B2O3)−xCa3WO6 (x = 8−15 mol%). Additionally, the crystallization of CaWO4 was found by Raman spectroscopy due to the formation of W=O double bondings of WO4 tetrahedra in the pristine glass despite starting with the higher calcium content of Ca3WO6. Eu3+ ions were excluded from the CaWO4 crystals and positioned in the borate glass phase as a stable site for them, which provided local environments in higher symmetry around Eu3+ ions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Monolithic materials of glass-ceramics have recently attracted a lot of interest because of their potential applications as toughened ceramics for biomedical uses [1,2,3], ionic conductors for energy conversions [4,5,6], and luminescence phosphors for efficient illuminations and display devices [7,8,9]. To design the synthesis of glass-ceramics with a targeted crystal, a choice of starting glass composition is to be carefully considered. In this study, the material evolution of glass-ceramic bearing calcium tungstate crystals in a glass matrix doped with red-luminescent Eu3+ ions was investigated. We aimed for precipitation of calcium tungstate crystals as a single phase in glasses. Additionally, control in local structures around Eu3+ ions simultaneously doped with the initial host glasses was attempted. There are two types of calcium tungstate crystals of interest as rare-earth phosphors [10,11,12], tetragonal CaWO4 and monoclinic Ca3WO6. The former is composed of WO4 tetrahedra [13], while the latter has a double perovskite structure with CaO6 and WO6 octahedra [14]. The question is whether Eu3+ ions are finally positioned after the precipitation of crystals in glass-ceramics based on calcium tungstates.
The choice of the host matrix is very important for this material elaboration. Among preliminary screening tests with silicate, borate, phosphate, etc., calcium borate was selected as a host matrix for its compatibility with the calcium tungstate crystals and low melting point. Ca3WO6 was used as a starting crystal, which is known to exhibit quite high red luminescent purity for Eu3+ ions [14]. In this study, glass samples were first prepared from 33CaO-67B2O3(in molar) glass and Ca3WO6 crystal with various compositional ratios, and their thermal and structural properties were investigated. Additionally, they were then examined to know which crystal phases were obtained by thermal treatment at a temperature higher than the glass transition temperature. This material elaboration could be utilized to develop luminescent glass-ceramics. Hence, thermal properties of glass transition temperature (Tg) and on-set crystallization temperature (Tx), and melting point (Tm) were here reported, as well as the results of elementary analysis. Structures of the pristine glasses were examined by Raman spectroscopy to elucidate the role of the unit structures of borate and tungstate in glass on the precipitation of calcium tungstate crystals. X-ray diffractometry showed that CaWO4 crystals were precipitated in the borate glassy matrix rather than Ca3WO6, despite higher calcium content in the pristine glasses. Photoluminescence properties of Eu3+-doped (100 − x)(33CaO-67B2O3) − xCa3WO6 glass and glass-ceramics were also surveyed and the spectral change due to the precipitation of calcium tungstate was discussed in light of the asymmetry ratio of Eu3+ ions [15] derived from the luminescence intensity of electric dipole 5D0-7F2 transition against that of magnetic dipole 5D0-7F1 transition, which revealed the thermal evolution of local structures around Eu3+ ions to more stable and symmetric ones that were different from CaWO4 crystal.

2. Experimentals

2.1. Glass Synthesis & Crystallization

H3BO3, CaCO3, Eu2O3, and WO3 were used as received for the sample preparation. In this study, (100 − x)(33CaO-67B2O3) − xCa3WO6 (x = 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 15 and 16 mol%) glasses and 85 (33CaO-67B2O3) − 15Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 glasses were synthesized by a melt-quenching method from homogeneous mixtures of Ca3WO6 or Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 powder in crystal and 33CaO-67B2O3 glass powder (denoted as 33CaB). The mixed powder was melted in a platinum crucible by heating at 1100 °C in a furnace for x = 1–8 mol% Ca3WO6 and quenched on a metallic plate. To gain glass samples over x = 12 mol%, a higher melting temperature of 1400 °C and water quenching were needed to apply a faster cooling rate.
The details of the respective powders used to prepare the glass samples studied (the pristine) are shown below: 33 CaB glass was synthesized by a melt-quenching method. Firstly, H3BO3 was heated at 100 °C for 24 h for the evaporation of adsorbed H2O molecules. The mixture of baches powder of H3BO3 and CaCO3 was melted in a platinum crucible at 1080 °C for 2 h in a furnace and quenched on a metallic plate. Ca3WO6 and Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 powders were synthesized by the traditional solid-state reaction method. A batch powder with a 3.2/1 molar ratio of CaCO3/WO3 was mixed for 12 h with ethanol and a ZrO2 milling ball, and calcined at 1200 °C for 12 h in an alumina crucible, after drying at 80°C [16]. CaWO6 powder also gained from the same powder calcination procedure. Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 powder synthesized by CaCO3, WO3, and Eu2O3 using a solid-state reaction method. The stoichiometric powders were mixed for 30 min with ethanol in a mortar and calcinated at 1100 °C for 6 h in an alumina crucible.
Glass-ceramics with 2–15 mol% Ca3WO6 contents were gained by a heat-treatment at a temperature higher than their respective glass transition point, 660 °C, 665 °C, and 635 °C applied for 2 and 12, 4 and 8, and 15 mol% samples for 90 h in a furnace, as shown in Table 1.

2.2. Characterizations

X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained with Bruker D8 Advance eco by using Cu Kα radiation to confirm glass formation and for the assignment of crystalline phases that were precipitated. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) (Quanta 200, FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA) were adopted for sample observations and quantitative elemental analysis. Thermal properties were estimated from Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) (NETZSCH DSC404F1). Raman spectroscopy using a green laser (532 nm) as a light source (Thermo Scientific NicoletTM Almega) was adopted for understanding the chemical unit structures in each of the samples. To investigate the luminescence properties, photoluminescence (PL) spectra were examined by a fluorescence spectrophotometer equipped with double monochromators (Czerny-Turner) in excitation and emission (Fluorolog3, Horiba Jobin Yvon), using a 450 W Xe-lamp as an excitation source.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Quenched Glasses of (100 − x)33CaB-xCa3WO6 (x = 0~16 mol%)

Figure 1 shows a photo-image of the glass samples and glass-ceramics at x = 4 and 8 mol% Ca3WO6. The clear and transparent glasses were gained in the range between x = 0 to 4 mol% Ca3WO6. The 8 mol% sample appeared partially crystallized, but was at most clear and transparent, as seen in Figure 1. While a normal quenching rate was applied for x =0−8 mol% to obtain the transparent glass samples, quit rapid quenching into water (called “water quenching” here) was needed over x = 12 mol%. However, even after the water quenching, the obtained glasses at x = 12–16 mol% still had a part of crystals. It was because the quenching was conducted so that the crucible with glass melt was put into water from the bottom of the crucible and roughly 80% of the crucible was sunk in the water bath. The top of the melt was not covered with water to avoid unexpected influences of water molecules on the structure of the obtained borate glasses. If the crucible was not completely cooled down to room temperature and then the crucible was taken from the water bath, the supercooled liquid was resultantly kept warm to allow it to be crystallized. Nevertheless, the crystallized portion was only just seen between the interface of glass melt and crucible for x = 12 and 15 mol% and it was found to be small. The volume ratio of glass and crystals was about 9:1 for x = 12 and 15 mol%, and about 6:4 for x = 16 mol%, as shown in Table 1. (Other possibilities will be discussed in Section 3.3. EDS elementary analysis for 33CaB-Ca3WO6 glasses.) Figure 2 shows an SEM image of the crystal part of the 15 mol% sample of 85(33CaO-67B2O3) – 15Ca3WO6. The observed morphology of the crystal is so unique, and the SEM image clarifies the line structure of the surface of the crystal, indicating uniaxial nuclear growth of the tetragonal CaWO4 phase, which will be discussed later. Toward further experiments, the crystallized parts for 12 and 15 mol% were carefully removed, and then clear and transparent glassy parts were extracted. However, at x = 16 mol%, serious crystallization occurred and thus it was not used for the heat-treatment.

3.2. XRD Patterns of 33CaB-Ca3WO6 Glasses & Glass-Ceramics

Figure 3a shows XRD patterns of the samples (x = 0–15 mol%) mentioned above. All XRD patterns shown here have a broad halo characteristic that exhibits their amorphous natures. At x = 0 to 15 mol%, the samples are confirmed to be homogeneous without any crystalline components, which were thus used as pristine glass samples for the further heat-treatment. The above glass formation region is in good agreement with one reported in the previous research [17].
After the heat-treatment, the 2 mol% samples were completely devitrified from the surface to the center of the glass, while the 4 and 8 mol% samples heated became opaque just on the surface and white dots appeared on a part of the surface. The 12 and 15 mol% samples became white and appeared to be completely crystallized after the heat-treatment. The impacts of the heat-treatment were firstly examined by XRD methodology.
Figure 3b shows XRD patterns of the samples after the heat-treatment at a temperature higher than Tg for 90 h (See Table 1). In this figure, a theoretical XRD pattern of the crystal structure of CaWO4 (ICSD ID No.15586) calculated by using RIETAN-FP [18] is also shown for comparison. From the XRD patterns, a crystalline phase of CaWO4 was found at x = 12 and 15 mol% of Ca3WO6 (the photo-image of them are depicted in Figure S2 as Supplemental data), as well as at x = 15 mol% of Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6. It is noted at x = 15 mol% for non- and Eu3+ doped samples, the peaks observed at 2θ ~ 31.5° and 65.6°, assigned to 004 and 008 reflections of CaWO4 were enhanced in intensity when the patterns were compared with the powder pattern calculated. This result indicates a crystalline orientation to the c-axis for the precipitated CaWO4 phase. It can also be mentioned that no crystalline secondary or impurity phases were observed at x =12 and 15 mol%. However, many X-ray reflections were detected for the 2 mol% sample after the heat-treatment, which were identified as CaB4O7 and CaB2O4 phases, as well as the CaWO4 phase. x = 4 mol%, XRD data showed an amorphous state of the sample, but a small amount of CaWO4 phase was found by Raman spectroscopy, which was shown in Figure S2 as Supplemental data. Moreover, it should be borne in mind that the single-phase precipitation of CaWO4 crystal in borate glasses requires a Ca3WO6 content higher than 8 mol% against 33CaB glass.

3.3. EDS Elementary Analysis for 33CaB-Ca3WO6 Glasses

Figure 4 shows the glass compositions (B2O3, CaO, and WO3) of the 33CaB-Ca3WO6 glasses (glass parts) for x = 8 to 16 mol%, estimated by EDS measurements. Qualitatively the decrease in B2O3 content and the increase in CaO and WO3 with the addition of Ca3WO6 are matched with the variations of the theoretical contents. However, the experimental values of CaO and WO3 contents became lower than the theoretical ones for the respective components. However, the experimental value of B2O3 content was higher than the theoretical one. It may be caused by the possible evaporation of CaO and WO3 components during melting because the addition of Ca3WO6 to 33CaB glass required a higher melting temperature of 1400 °C. During the melt preparation, the 33CaB component was relatively faster changed to a liquid phase in the initial stage of melting, where Ca3WO6 crystals could stay in a solid-state. It can be noted that the deviation between the experimental and theoretical contents was reduced for the higher Ca3WO6 concentration. A mechanism causing this behavior is still not known, but it could be speculated that the CaO component from Ca3WO6 crystals was preferentially introduced into the 33CaB melt and then made it easy to further incorporate the remaining WO3 component to the melt for the higher Ca3WO6 concentration, especially x = 16 mol%. In Section 3.1, we explained the partial crystallization of the quenched glasses for x = 12 to 16 mol% after the water quenching. The fact that the crystals were found, especially between the glass and crucible, it may result from the decomposition of Ca3WO6 to 2CaO and CaWO4. If it is the case, the observation in Section 3.1 could be explained, such that the CaO component was incorporated into 33CaB melt, while the CaWO4 was partially melted, but still, CaWO4 crystals remained after the water quenching. As an alternative possibility, it is deduced that the CaO and CaWO4 produced from the decomposition of Ca3WO6 crystals could be melt, but the high viscosity of the melt brought about the heterogeneity of the melt, and eventually, a CaWO4 rich liquid was free to be precipitated at the lower part of the quenched glass.

3.4. Thermal Properties

Figure 5a shows the DSC curves of (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) – x Ca3WO6 glasses. These curves exhibit the typical thermal behavior of glasses with a small endothermic peak, large exothermic peaks, and a large endothermic peak, representing glass transition temperature (Tg), on-set crystallization temperature (Tx), and melting temperature (Tm), respectively. The values of Tg and Tx as a function of Ca3WO6 concentration are shown in Figure 5b. The value of Tg slightly decreased from ~640 °C to ~630 °C, up to 12 mol% Ca3WO6 concentration and then dropped down to ~600 °C at 15 mol% Ca3WO6. The value of Tx increased from 760 °C to ~785 °C between 0 and 2 mol% Ca3WO6. For higher Ca3WO6 concentrations, the Tx value decreased drastically to ~740 °C until 4 mol% Ca3WO6 and then decreased more gently to ~700 °C for the further higher Ca3WO6 concentrations.
The parameter T (=TxTg) and Hruby parameter, Kgl given by Reference [19]
K g l = T x T g T m T x
This is shown in Figure 5c to evaluate their glass stability. ΔT represents the temperature interval during nucleation. Thus, ΔT is also used to evaluate the stability of the glassy state against crystallization. The values of ΔT at 1–2 mol% Ca3WO6 concentration are higher than 100 °C, indicating that they are more stable against devitrification [20]. However, the ΔT values at Ca3WO6 concentrations over 12 mol% were lower than 80 °C, indicating that these Ca3WO6-rich glasses are easily crystallized in comparison to the cases of the lower Ca3WO6 concentrations. That is well-matched with the fact that CaWO4 single-phase appeared by crystallization at 12 and 15 mol% Ca3WO6. Kgl also showed a similar tendency. The glass-forming ability is in general determined by measuring the critical cooling rates. Firstly, to be mentioned, it is proved that, for thermally stable glass-forming systems, the value of Kgl is more than 0.1 and hence thermal stabilization of glasses can be characterized by high values of Kgl and vice versa [21]. From previous experimental and theoretical researches on the various glass-forming compositions where the critical cooling rate was correlated with the glass stability (Kgl), it is also found that there exists an empirical relation between Kgl and critical cooling rate [22,23]. Therefore, it is plausible to use Kgl for judging the glass-forming ability [24]. The Ca3WO6 concentration dependence of Kgl is shown in Figure 5c. The values, Kgl of 12, 15 mol% Ca3WO6 are lower than Kgl of 1–8 mol% Ca3WO6, indicating that 12, 15 mol% Ca3WO6 have the low glass-forming ability. This is corresponding to the fact that the 12, 15 mol% samples needed a higher cooling rate, as using water to quench the glass melt, than the 1–8mol% samples. The higher and lower values of ΔT and Kgl at the 1, 2 mol% and 12, 15 mol% Ca3WO6 seem influenced by the same factor: The introduction of WO3 as a network former to B2O3 glass network at the lower concentration would reinforce the resultant glass structures, however, the influence of CaO as an inhibitor to glass-forming must become dominant over WO3 as a network former at the samples with 8–16 mol% Ca3WO6.

3.5. Raman Spectroscopy

Figure 6a,b show area normalized Raman spectra of 0–16 mol% Ca3WO6 glass samples and deconvoluted Raman spectra of 33CaO-67B2O3 glass. The peaks at 420–485 cm−1 (Nos.2 and 3), 630 cm−1 (No.4), 755–770 cm−1 (No.6), and 950 cm−1 (No.8) can be assigned to B–O stretching modes of borate symmetric and asymmetric vibrations, ring-type metaborate, four- and three-coordinated boron in diborate [25] and orthoborate group, respectively. Additionally, the peaks at 300–350 cm−1 (No.1) and 850–920 cm−1 (No.7) are assigned to the O-W-O bending mode in distorted γ–WO6 and W–O stretching vibrations of W6+ = O double bonding [26], respectively. The deconvoluted peak intensity of Nos.1, 7, and 8, and Nos.2, 3, 4, and 6 as a function of Ca3WO6 concentration showed in Figure 7a,b, respectively. The peak intensities of Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 6 decrease with Ca3WO6 concentration, whereas the peak intensity of No.8 increases with the Ca3WO6 concentration. The decreasing peak intensities of Nos.2 and 3 indicate the decrease amount of boron in the glass host. This result corresponds to the decreasing number of B2O3 estimated by EDS. The borate ring groups, ring-type metaborate, and diborate have bridging oxygen and work as a glass network former. Orthoborate groups have non-bridging oxygens and are located at the end of glass networks. The above result that bridging oxygen and non-bridging oxygen decreased and increased with Ca3WO6 concentration, respectively, shows the host glass structures were strongly affected by Ca2+ ions working as a network modifier with the Ca3WO6 additions. Thus, the glass sample with lower Ca3WO6 concentration included much of the amount of borate ring structures in comparison to the samples with higher Ca3WO6 concentration, and it seems that an impurity phase CaB4O7, which includes a borate ring structure, appeared in the crystallized 2 mol% Ca3WO6 sample.
However, the peak intensity of Nos.1 and 7 exhibited an increasing tendency with Ca3WO6 concentration. Especially, peak No.7 showed a significant increase in comparison with peak No.1. In other words, a more significant change in the peak intensity about W = O double bonding than WO6 bending mode was observed, implying an increase in the number of W6+ ions and a structural change to WO4 tetrahedra was more dominant than to WO6 octahedra. Thus, the CaWO4 crystal phase composed of WO4 tetrahedra would be precipitated after the heat-treatment, instead of the Ca3WO6 crystal phase with WO6 octahedra.
To understand the structural changes of 33CaO-67B2O3 glass by Ca3WO6 addition, more discussion can be given in the following: The borate glass matrix was composed of ring-type metaborates and diborates with bridging oxygens at lower Ca3WO6 concentration. However, the addition of more Ca3WO6 contents promoted the structural conversion of them to orthborates (BO3)3− with three non-bridging oxygens, as shown in Figure 7a because the strong ionic field of Ca2+ ion is enough to break B-O-B networks of metaborate/diborate and produces the isolated structures of orthoborate. Figure 7a also elucidated a larger number of tungsten oxides of covalent WO4 (No.7) working as a network formerly in comparison to WO6 (No.1) working as a network modifier. This is interpreted so that the ionic nature of Ca2+ ions mainly affected the borate networks, while more covalent WO4 entities can take part in the construction of a glass network with the borate structures with bridging oxygens to maintain the glassy structures after the quite rapid quenching. Even at x = 16 mol%, the B2O3 concentration was higher than WO3 (B2O3/WO3 = 3.51) and the increasing orthoborates would make the vitrification difficult from the viewpoint of structural chemistry. It should be borne in mind that the oxygen basicity was also increased with the introduction of Ca2+ ions as CaO from Ca3WO6 content, which promoted the production of W=O double bonds as well as O-W-O linkages. The W=O bond is not a part of the WO6, but the WO4 structure. From these considerations, it can therefore be deduced that the formation of WO4 structures may support stabilizing their glassy state and also be important to model the structural changes of the calcium borate glasses obtained by the rapid water quenching with the addition of more Ca3WO6 contents.

3.6. Luminescence Properties

Figure 8 displays PL spectra and asymmetry ratio (∧) of 15 mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 glass, glass-ceramic, and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 normalized by PL intensity at 593nm. Three peaks of ~578 nm, ~590 nm, and ~615 nm originate from Eu3+ luminescence assignable to 5D07F0, 5D07F1, and 5D07F2 transitions, respectively [27]. Asymmetry ratio, which is defined as a PL intensity ratio of electric dipole 5D07F2 and magnetic dipole 5D07F1 intensities (∧ = I(5D07F2)/I(5D07F1)), estimated for discussion on the degree in asymmetry of local structure around Eu3+ ions [28,29,30]. It is well known that 5D07F2 transition intensity is much affected by local asymmetry around Eu3+ and 5D07F1 transition is independent of the local structure because of the respective natures of electric and magnetic dipole transitions [31]. Asymmetry ratios of 15mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 glass, glass-ceramic and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 are estimated as 3.0, 2.1, and 7.5, respectively. It is found that the asymmetry ratio of 15 mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 sample is lower in the glassy state than that of the crystal and decreased through the heat-treatment, although despite CaWO4 crystals, were precipitated in the glass-ceramics. The result suggests that the heat-treatment rearranged Eu3+ environments in the sample and eventually allowed the local symmetry of ligand structures around Eu3+ ion to be improved, and most of the Eu3+ ions were not positioned in the CaWO4 crystal phase precipitated but in the glass matrix. This is interpreted such that Ca and W ions were used for the precipitation of CaWO4 in a borate glass matrix and Eu3+ ions were forced to be located in a more ionic matrix of calcium borate glass with less W content. This is matched with the results of the Raman investigation. It is assumed that the glass structure becomes a more stable phase, because of ions transfer by heating.
To estimate how the doped Eu3+ ions were incorporated in the parent glass or the crystalline phase during the transformation of glass to the glass–ceramic system, Eu3+ 5D0 decay curves were examined and shown in Figure 9. It is seen that the luminescence decays were almost identical for the pristine glass and the glass-ceramic, while the Eu3+ ions in CaWO4 crystal exhibited a faster 5D0 decay curve. The evaluated lifetimes were 6.248 ± 0.007, 5.735 ± 0.008, and 1.479 ± 0.001 ms for the pristine glass, glass-ceramic, and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal, respectively. The PL lifetime is found to start to decrease a bit by the formation of the glass-ceramic, however, the values for the glass and glass-ceramic were almost the same, ~6 ms. However, the crystal Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 had a shorter lifetime of ~1.5 ms. The difference in the lifetime between the glass/glass-ceramic and the crystal corresponds to the behavior of the asymmetry ratios obtained from the PL data. As seen in a higher resolution PL detection (Figures S3 and S4 in Supplementary), sharp PL lines in 5D0-7F2 transition were more or less observed for the glass-ceramic, from which it is imagined that a part of Eu3+ ions could enter the CaWO4 crystal but the majority of the ions was still in the glass matrix. In general, a higher asymmetry ratio of Eu3+ 5D0-7F1,2 luminescence means an increase in the probability of 5D0-7F2 transition in electric dipole nature against that of 5D0-7F1 transition in magnetic dipole nature, which will induce the enhancement of total transition probability from 5D0 level and give faster 5D0 luminescence lifetime. This can well explain the difference in the behavior of the observed spectra and PL decays between the glass/glass-ceramic and the crystal. From the results, it can be mentioned that Eu3+ ions were still positioned in the glassy matrix even after the crystallization. More to be mentioned finally, the slight decrease in the PL lifetime and the decrease in the asymmetry ratio for the glass-ceramic in comparison to the pristine glass imply the presence of ion-ion interaction between Eu3+ ions and/or non-radiative transition in the glass-ceramic with higher symmetric sites for Eu3+ ions.

4. Conclusions

Synthesis of glass-ceramic, including the CaWO4 phase, was succeeded by the heat-treatment at a temperature higher than Tg for (100 − x) (33CaB) − xCa3WO6 (x = 2–15 mol%). XRD data clarified the precipitation of CaWO4 crystals in x = 2, 12, and 15 mol% samples by the heat-treatment. The 2mol% Ca3WO6 glass-ceramic sample included crystal phases of CaB4O7 and CaB2O4. DSC curves and Raman spectra were examined to understand the crystallization mechanism of CaWO4, CaB4O7, and CaB2O4 in the glasses. The stability of glassy state ΔT increased in the range from x = 0 to 2 mol% and then decreased in the range of higher than 4mol% Ca3WO6 content. The above change corresponded with the numbers of glass network former of borates with bridging oxygens, which was elucidated by Raman spectra. The result suggested that the decreasing borate ring structures helped the crystalization of CaWO4 without B2O3 components by the heat-treatment. Contrary to the structural evolution of borates, the W=O double bondings in WO4 tetrahedra were significantly increased with the Ca3WO6 content, while the WO6 octahedra bending vibrations tended to slowly increase, which was also found by Raman spectroscopy. This behavior was a cause of the induction of CaWO4 composed of WO4 tetrahedral units by the heat-treatment instead of Ca3WO6 with WO6 octahedral units. PL investigation in the scope of asymmetry ratio of Eu3+ PL spectra demonstrated that Eu3+ ions doped in the 15mol% sample were surrounded by a ligand structure with higher local symmetry after the heat-treatment than Eu3+ ions in the pristine glass or CaWO4 crystals, indicating that the heat-treatment forced Eu3+ ions to be located in the more ionic matrix of calcium borate glass with less W content.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/4/952/s1, Figure S1: Raman spectra of the (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) – x Ca3WO6 (x = 0−15) glass samples at crystalline part after the post heat-treatment.; Figure S2: Photo-image of (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) – x Ca3WO6 (x = 12 and 15 mol%) after the heat-treatment given in Table 1 in the maintext.; Figure S3: PL and PLE spectra of glass (Glass), glass-ceramic (TT4d) for the 15 mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 samples, and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal (xxPwd). The glass-ceramic was composed of CaWO4 crystals. The assignments of the optical transitions were given in the figure according to the literature (W.T.Canall, P.R.Fild, and K.Rajnak, “Electronic Energy Levels of the Trivalent Lanthanide Aquo Ions. IV. Eu3+”, J.Chem.Phys. 49(10) (1968) 4450–4455).; Figure S4: Enlarged PL spectra of 5D0-7F1 and 5D0-7F2 transitions normalized by 613 nm PL intensity for the glass (Glass), glass-ceramic (TT4d) for the 15 mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 samples, and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal (xxPwd).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.d.L. and T.H.; methodology, M.B. and D.d.L.; validation, D.d.L. and T.H.; formal analysis, T.O., M.B., M.R.C. and T.H.; investigation, T.O., M.B. and M.R.C.; resources, D.d.L.; data curation, T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.O.; writing—review and editing, T.H.; visualization, T.O.; supervision, D.d.L. and T.H.; project administration, D.d.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the NITech (Nagoya Institute of Technology) Grant for Global Initiative Projects 2019 and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under GRK2495/G. One of the authors (TT) gratefully acknowledged Heike Reinfelder in glass synthesis, Sabine Fiedler in DSC measurements, and Eva Springer in SEM/EDS experiments for their help. TH also appreciated the encouragement for this work by JSPS Japanese-German Graduate Externship (Grant No.2019/R1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Diba, M.; Goudouri, O.-M.; Tapia, F.; Boccaccini, A.R. Magnesium-containing bioactive polycrystalline silicate-based ceramics and glass-ceramics for biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mat. Sci. 2019, 18, 147–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, P.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Xu, S. Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and properties of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2014, 402, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Villas-Boas, M.O.C.; Serbena, F.C.; Soares, V.O.; Mathias, I.; Zanotto, E.D. Residual stress effect on the fracture toughness of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hayashi, A.; Minami, K.; Ujiie, S.; Tatsumisago, M. Preparation and ionic conductivity of Li7P3S11−z glass-ceramic electrolytes. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2010, 356, 2670–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chowdari, B.V.R.; Subba Rao, G.V.; Lee, G.Y.H. XPS and ionic conductivity studies on Li 2O–Al2O3-(TiO2 or GeO2)-P2O3 glass-ceramics. Solid State. Ionics 2000, 136–137, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ortiz-Mosquera, J.F.; Nieto-Muñoz, A.M.; Rodrigues, A.C.M. Precursor glass stability, microstructure and ionic conductivity of glass ceramics from the Na1+xAlxGe2–x(PO4)3 NASICON series. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2019, 513, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castaing, V.; Sontakke, A.D.; Xu, J.; Fernández-Carrio´n, A.J.; Genevois, C.; Tanabe, S.; Allix, M.; Viana, B. Persistent energy transfer in ZGO:Cr3+,Yb3+: A new strategy to design nano glass-ceramics featuring deep red and near infrared persistent luminescence. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 19458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Shang, F.; Chen, G.; Xu, J. Wide-range thermometry and up-conversion luminescence of Ca5(PO4)3F:Yb3+/Er3+ transparent glass ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 5718–5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, J.; Lu, X.; Lin, C.; Jain, R.K. Luminescent ion-doped transparent glass ceramics for mid-infrared light sources. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 21522–21548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wu, F.-N.; Yu, H.-J.; Hu, Y.-Y.; Zhang, H.-D.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.-P.; Yang, Y.-G.; Wei, L. Effects of slight structural distortion on the luminescence performance in (Ca1-xEux)WO4 luminescent materials. Luminescence 2020, 36, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, Z.; Jiang, L.; Xu, X.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Chen, H. Synthesis and Luminescence Properties of Ho3+ and Er3+-Doped CaWO4 Nanocrystalline Powders Prepared by Self-Propagating Combustion Method. J. Fluoresc. 2020, 30, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, K.; Van Deun, R. Obtaining Efficiently Tunable Red Emission in Ca3LnδWO6:Mn4+ (Ln= La, Gd, Y, Lu, δ = 0.1) Phosphors Derived from Nearly Nonluminescent Ca3WO6:Mn4+ via Ionic Substitution Engineering for Solid-State Lighting. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 7256–7261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gracia, L.; Longo, V.M.; Cavalcante, L.S.; Beltrán, A.; Avansi, W.; Li, M.S.; Mastelaro, V.R.; Varela, J.A.; Longo, E.; Andrés, J. Presence of excited electronic state in CaWO4 crystals provoked by a tetrahedral distortion: An experimental and theoretical investigation. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 043501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhao, X.; Wang, J.; Fan, L.; Ding, Y.; Li, Z.; Yua, T.; Zou, Z. Efficient red phosphor double-perovskite Ca3WO6 with A-site substitution of Eu3+. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 13502–13508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, X.; Hayakawa, T.; Nogami, M. Photoluminescence Properties and 5D0 Decay Analysis of LaF3:Eu3+ Nanocrystals Prepared by Using Surfactant Assist. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2011, 8, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Xu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Qi, T.; Liu, G.; Peng, Z.; Cui, Y.; Li, J. Ca3WO6 Prepared by Roasting Tungsten-Containing Materials and Its Leaching Performance. Int. J. Refract. Hard Mat. 2015, 52, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Imaoka, M. Studies on the Glass Formation Range of Borate System. J. Ceram. Assoc. Jpn. 1961, 69, 72–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Izumi, F.; Momma, K. Three-Dimensional Visualization in Powder Diffraction. Solid State Phenom. 2007, 130, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hruby, A. Evaluation of Glass-forming tendency by means of DTA. Czechoslov. J. Phys. 1972, 22, 1187–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, S.; Wang, X.; Fang, D.; Xu, S.; Hu, L. Spectroscopic Properties and Thermal Stability of Er3+-Doped Tungsten–Tellurite Glass for Waveguide Amplifier Application. J. Alloys Compds. 2006, 424, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thornburg, D.D. Evaluation of Glass Formation Tendency from Rate Dependent Thermograms. Mater. Res. Bull. 1974, 9, 1481–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cabral, A.A.; Cardoso, A.A.D.; Zanotto, E.D. Glass-Forming Ability versus Stability of Silicate Glasses. I. Experimental Test. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 320, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Avramov, I.; Zanotto, E.D.; Prado, M.O. Glass-Forming Ability versus Stability of Silicate Glasses. II. Theoretical Demonstration. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 320, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Senthil Murugan, G.; Ohishi, Y. TeO2–BaO–SrO–Nb2O5 Glasses: A New Glass System for Waveguide Devices Applications. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2004, 341, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Manara, D.; Grandjean, A.; Neuville, D.R. Advances in Understanding the Structure of Borosilicate Glasses: A Raman Spectroscopy Study. Am. Mineral. 2009, 94, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, S.-H.; Cheong, H.M.; Tracy, C.E.; Mascarenhas, A.; Benson, D.K.; Deb, S.K. Raman Spectroscopic Studies of Electrochromic a-WO3. Electrochim. Acta 1999, 44, 3111–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carnall, W.T.; Fields, P.R.; Rajnak, K. Electronic Energy Levels of the Trivalent Lanthanide Aquo Ions. IV. Eu 3+. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 4450–4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kolesnikov, I.E.; Povolotskiy, A.V.; Mamonova, D.V.; Kolesnikov, E.Y.; Kurochkin, A.V.; Lähderanta, E.; Mikhailov, M.D. Asymmetry Ratio as a Parameter of Eu3+ Local Environment in Phosphors. J. Rare Earths 2018, 36, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gu, F.; Zhong Li, C.; Bo Jiang, H. Combustion Synthesis and Photoluminescence of Nanocrystals with Addition. J. Cryst. Growth 2006, 289, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Balakrishnaiah, R.; Vijaya, R.; Babu, P.; Jayasankar, C.K.; Reddy, M.L.P. Characterization of Eu3+-Doped Fluorophosphate Glasses for Red Emission. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2007, 353, 1397–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nayab Rasool, S.; Rama Moorthy, L.; Kulala Jayasankar, C. Optical and Luminescence Properties of Eu3+-Doped Phosphate Based Glasses. Mater. Express 2013, 3, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photo-image of (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 (x = 4 (Left) and 8 (Right)) glass before (Downward) and after (Upward) heat-treatment.
Figure 1. Photo-image of (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 (x = 4 (Left) and 8 (Right)) glass before (Downward) and after (Upward) heat-treatment.
Materials 14 00952 g001
Figure 2. SEM image of the crystal part of 85 (33CaO-67B2O3) – 15 Ca3WO6 glass.
Figure 2. SEM image of the crystal part of 85 (33CaO-67B2O3) – 15 Ca3WO6 glass.
Materials 14 00952 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (a) (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 glass samples and (b) (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 samples after heat-treatment at higher than each Tg through to 90 h.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (a) (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 glass samples and (b) (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 samples after heat-treatment at higher than each Tg through to 90 h.
Materials 14 00952 g003
Figure 4. Glass composition estimated by EDS measurements for (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 (dashed and solid lines show theoretical and experimental contents, respectively).
Figure 4. Glass composition estimated by EDS measurements for (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 (dashed and solid lines show theoretical and experimental contents, respectively).
Materials 14 00952 g004
Figure 5. (a) DSC curves of (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 glasses with an insertion of the expanded figure around Tg, (b) The values of Tg and Tx, and (c) ΔT and Kgl as a function of Ca3WO6 concentration.
Figure 5. (a) DSC curves of (100 − x) (33CaO-67B2O3) − x Ca3WO6 glasses with an insertion of the expanded figure around Tg, (b) The values of Tg and Tx, and (c) ΔT and Kgl as a function of Ca3WO6 concentration.
Materials 14 00952 g005
Figure 6. (a) Area normalized Raman spectra of 0–16 mol% Ca3WO6 glass samples and (b) deconvoluted Raman spectra of 33CaO–67B2O3 glass.
Figure 6. (a) Area normalized Raman spectra of 0–16 mol% Ca3WO6 glass samples and (b) deconvoluted Raman spectra of 33CaO–67B2O3 glass.
Materials 14 00952 g006
Figure 7. The decomposition peak intensity of (a) Nos.1, 7, and 8, and (b) Nos.2, 3, 4, and 6 with Ca3WO6 concentration.
Figure 7. The decomposition peak intensity of (a) Nos.1, 7, and 8, and (b) Nos.2, 3, 4, and 6 with Ca3WO6 concentration.
Materials 14 00952 g007
Figure 8. PL spectra and asymmetry ratio (∧) of 15mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 samples (pristine glass and glass-ceramic) and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal, normalized by the 593 nm PL intensity.
Figure 8. PL spectra and asymmetry ratio (∧) of 15mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 samples (pristine glass and glass-ceramic) and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal, normalized by the 593 nm PL intensity.
Materials 14 00952 g008
Figure 9. Eu3+ PL decay curves of the 15mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 samples (the pristine glass and glass-ceramic) and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal (λex = 394nm, λem = 613nm). The evaluated PL lifetime was τG = 6.248 ± 0.007 ms (the pristine glass), τGC = 5.735 ± 0.008 ms (the glass-ceramic), and τCEWO = 1.479 ± 0.001 ms (the Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal).
Figure 9. Eu3+ PL decay curves of the 15mol% Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6 samples (the pristine glass and glass-ceramic) and Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal (λex = 394nm, λem = 613nm). The evaluated PL lifetime was τG = 6.248 ± 0.007 ms (the pristine glass), τGC = 5.735 ± 0.008 ms (the glass-ceramic), and τCEWO = 1.479 ± 0.001 ms (the Ca0.98Eu0.02WO4 crystal).
Materials 14 00952 g009
Table 1. Summary of sample preparation: Quenching condition (N.Q.: Normal Quenching, W.Q.: Water Quenching), Ratio of Glass (G) and Crystal (C) inside the species quenched, Location of crystals (SurF.: Surface, IntF.:Interface between glass and crucible, V.C.: Volume Crystallization, n.d.: not detected), Results of XRD and Glass Transition temperature Tg for the obtained glasses (pristine), Heating condition (Temperature and Time) for fabricating glass-ceramics (GC), Results of XRD and Raman experiments, and Detected phases of crystals after the heat-treatment, for (100 − x)(33CaO-67B2O3) − xCa3WO6(or Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6) samples. (-: no data; n.a.: not applied).
Table 1. Summary of sample preparation: Quenching condition (N.Q.: Normal Quenching, W.Q.: Water Quenching), Ratio of Glass (G) and Crystal (C) inside the species quenched, Location of crystals (SurF.: Surface, IntF.:Interface between glass and crucible, V.C.: Volume Crystallization, n.d.: not detected), Results of XRD and Glass Transition temperature Tg for the obtained glasses (pristine), Heating condition (Temperature and Time) for fabricating glass-ceramics (GC), Results of XRD and Raman experiments, and Detected phases of crystals after the heat-treatment, for (100 − x)(33CaO-67B2O3) − xCa3WO6(or Ca2.98Eu0.02WO6) samples. (-: no data; n.a.: not applied).
xQuenching ConditionRatio
(G:C)
Location of CrystalsXRD of the PristineTgHeating Condition (Temp./Time)XRD after Heating Raman after Heating (Figure S1)Phases of Crystals
0N.Q.10:0n.d.G638.3 °C800 °C
/40 min
-GCCaB4O7, CaB2O4
1N.Q.10:0n.d.G637.5 °C800 °C
/40 min
-GCCaB4O7, CaB2O4, CaWO4
2N.Q.10:0n.d.G637.5 °C660 °C
/90 h
GCGCCaB4O7, CaB2O4, CaWO4
4N.Q.10:0n.d.G637.7 °C665 °C
/90 h
GGC+GCaWO4
8N.Q.~10:0SurF.G631.3 °C665 °C
/90 h
-GCCaWO4
12W.Q.9:1IntF.G628.7 °C660 °C
/90 h
GCGCCaWO4
15W.Q.9:1IntF.G601.4 °C635 °C
/90 h
GCGCCaWO4
16W.Q.6:4V.C.GC-n.a.---
15, Eu3+W.Q.9:1IntF.G-635 °C
/90 h
GC-CaWO4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Otsuka, T.; Brehl, M.; Cicconi, M.R.; de Ligny, D.; Hayakawa, T. Thermal Evolutions to Glass-Ceramics Bearing Calcium Tungstate Crystals in Borate Glasses Doped with Photoluminescent Eu3+ Ions. Materials 2021, 14, 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040952

AMA Style

Otsuka T, Brehl M, Cicconi MR, de Ligny D, Hayakawa T. Thermal Evolutions to Glass-Ceramics Bearing Calcium Tungstate Crystals in Borate Glasses Doped with Photoluminescent Eu3+ Ions. Materials. 2021; 14(4):952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Otsuka, Takahito, Martin Brehl, Maria Rita Cicconi, Dominique de Ligny, and Tomokatsu Hayakawa. 2021. "Thermal Evolutions to Glass-Ceramics Bearing Calcium Tungstate Crystals in Borate Glasses Doped with Photoluminescent Eu3+ Ions" Materials 14, no. 4: 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040952

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop