Next Article in Journal
Novel Combinatorial Strategy Using Thermal Inkjet Bioprinting, Chemotherapy, and Radiation on Human Breast Cancer Cells; an In-Vitro Cell Viability Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on Corrosion Behavior of AISI H13 Die Steel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 24
10.3390/ma14247853
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Cleanable Self-Assembled Nano-SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS Composite Filter Medium for High-Efficiency Fine Particulate Filtration

by
Yan Luo
1,2,*,
Zhongyun Shen
2,*,
Zhihao Ma
2,
Hongfeng Chen
1,2,
Xiaodong Wang
2,
Minger Luo
2,
Ran Wang
3 and
Jianguo Huang
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
2
Shaoxing Testing Institute of Quality and Technical Supervision, Market Supervision Administration of Shaoxing Municipahty, Shaoxing 312366, China
3
CAM-China Productivity Center for Machinery, China Academy of Machinery Science and Technology, Beijing 100044, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(24), 7853; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247853
Submission received: 26 October 2021 / Revised: 13 December 2021 / Accepted: 15 December 2021 / Published: 18 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Polymeric Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A silicon dioxide/polytetrafluoroethylene/polyethyleneimine/polyphenylene sulfide (SiO2/PTFE/PEI/PPS) composite filter medium with three-dimensional network structures was fabricated by using PPS nonwoven as the substrate which was widely employed as a cleanable filter medium. The PTFE/PEI bilayers were firstly coated on the surfaces of the PPS fibers through the layer-by-layer self-assembly technique ten times, followed by the deposition of SiO2 nanoparticles, yielding the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite material. The contents of the PTFE component were easily controlled by adjusting the number of self-assembled PTFE/PEI bilayers. As compared with the pure PPS nonwoven, the obtained SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite material exhibits better mechanical properties and enhanced wear, oxidation and heat resistance. When employed as a filter material, the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium exhibited excellent filtration performance for fine particulate. The PM2.5 (particulate matter less than 2.5 μm) filtration efficiency reached up to 99.55%. The superior filtration efficiency possessed by the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium was due to the uniformly modified PTFE layers, which played a dual role in fine particulate filtration. On the one hand, the PTFE layers not only increase the specific surface area and pore volume of the composite filter material but also narrow the spaces between the fibers, which were conducive to forming the dust cake quickly, resulting in intercepting the fine particles more efficiently than the pure PPS filter medium. On the other hand, the PTFE layers have low surface energy, which is in favor of the detachment of dust cake during pulse-jet cleaning, showing superior reusability. Thanks to the three-dimensional network structures of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium, the pressure drop during filtration was low.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of the social economy, the industrialization processes have not only brought a lot of materials that are of value to human beings, but also brought many negative effects to the natural environment. Air pollution, as a major environmental problem, has been arousing widespread concern. In particular, one of the primary air pollutants is fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which can enter the respiratory system, causing serious health problems and even death [1,2,3]. Air filters have been widely considered as an effective way to prevent PM2.5 emissions in the past few years, especially for the recyclable or cleanable air filter media due to their low cost and low energy consumption. Recently, various materials and technologies have been made to develop different kinds of new air filter materials, such as electrospinning [4,5,6]; electrostatic precipitation [7,8,9]; corona charging [10,11]; metal–organic framework (MOF)-based filter media [12,13,14]; self-assembled nanofibers based recyclable air filters [15]; and spun-bond [16,17,18], needle-punching [19,20,21] and melt-blown [22,23,24] nonwovens. Among these, the electrospinning fibers with small diameter and dense packing exhibit excellent filtration efficiency for fine particulate matter, but the undesirable high pressure-drop and low dust holding capacity restrict their application [25]. Electrostatic precipitators not only suffer from high energy consumption but also release some toxic gases such as ozone which are harmful to our health. For corona charging filter materials, the long-term maintenance of the electret charges under high temperature and wet conditions is still challenging [26]. The nonwoven materials with three-dimensional structures are widely used as cleanable filter media for particulate matter filtration due to their good mechanical properties, high surface-to-volume ratio and dust holding capacity, low air pressure-drop and high filtration efficiency [27].
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), para-aramid (PA), polyester fibers (PET), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) and polyimide (P84) [28,29,30,31,32] are commonly used nonwoven materials for particulate matter filtration. Among them, the PPS nonwoven has been widely applied to waste gas filtration, especially in some industrial waste gases with high humidity due to its excellent properties such as high temperature resistance, chemical corrosion resistance and hydrolysis resistance [33]. However, there are still some disadvantages of the PPS nonwoven, such as poor wear resistance, weak oxidation resistance and low specific surface area, which lead to serious limitations in practical engineering applications [34,35]. As a filter material, the PPS possesses a desirable low pressure-drop; however, the dust filtration efficiency, especially for fine particulate, is relatively low. With the introduction of ultralow emission environmental protection policy, the emission limits for fine particulate have become stricter, which has contributed to the urgent need for high filtration efficiency, long service life and low energy cost filter media. Therefore, considerable efforts have been made by researchers in order to overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks of the PPS filter media [36,37,38].
PTFE is well known for its excellent thermal stability, oxidation resistance, low surface energy, chemical resistance and good electrical insulation [39,40,41], and it has been widely used in high-temperature filters [28,42]. The PPS nonwoven modified with PTFE component is a simple and effective way to remedy the lack of low filtration efficiency and weak oxidation resistance of the PPS filter medium. For example, hydroentangled PTFE/PPS fabric filters were prepared which showed superior filtration properties compared to a single PPS filter medium [43]. There are some techniques reported to prepare the PTFE/PPS composites, such as dip-coating [44], dip-covering [45] and spray-coating [46] methods. However, the air permeability of the filter medium prepared by the dip-covering method is quite low, which means that high filtration efficiency is always accompanied by high filtration resistance [47]. The PTFE/PPS composite filter medium prepared by the dip-coating method always generates the aggregation of PTFE particles, which is not beneficial for dust holding capacity. Moreover, the negatively charged PTFE is not easily immobilized on the surface of a PPS fiber that is negatively charged as well, leading to the desquamation of the PTFE layer in the PTFE/PPS composite filter medium after a period of application. For an excellent functionalization of the filter material, there are two exceptionally critical concepts, namely the hierarchical structures and the roughness at nanoscale on the surfaces of the substrates [48,49]. The layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly technique is considered an effective and environmentally friendly technique for the fabrication of composite materials with designed structures and functionalities [50], and it provides a pathway for the preparation of the above-mentioned PTFE/PPS composite filter medium. Moreover, the repeated pulse-jet cleaning for the detachment of the dust will lead to rapid abrasion of the filter medium and decrease its service life. It is known that the introduction of hard nanoparticles, such as silicon dioxide, could improve the wear performance of polymers. For instance, a PPS-PTFE/SiO2 composite was prepared by a simple spray process and exhibited excellent wear and corrosion resistance properties [51].
In the present study, a SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite material was prepared through the layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly approach, where the positively charged polyethyleneimine (PEI) layer was firstly deposited on the surface of the PPS fiber, and then the negatively charged PTFE layer was absorbed on the surface of the PEI layer through electrostatic interaction, which was followed by the deposition of SiO2 nanoparticles. The SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite filter medium obtained perfectly maintained the hierarchical network structure of the initial PPS nonwoven, and the contents of the PTFE component were easily controlled by adjusting the number of the self-assembled PTFE/PEI bilayers. The obtained SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite material exhibits better mechanical properties and enhanced wear, oxidation and heat resistance in comparison with the pure PPS nonwoven. When employed as a filter material, the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium exhibited excellent filtration performance for fine particulate owing to its three-dimensional structures with high specific surface area and pore volume.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, 60 wt.% dispersion) were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Polyethyleneimine (PEI, typical MW = 70,000, 50 wt.% aqueous solution) was bought from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Triethanolamine, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, silane coupling agent (KH-550) and ethanol were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS, grammage: 550 g m−2) and PTFE membrane-coated PPS filter medium (grammage: 550 g m−2) were purchased from Liaoning Xinhongyuan Environmental Protection Material Co. Ltd. (Yingkou, Liaoning, China). All the chemicals were guaranteed reagents and used without further purification. The water used was purified by a Milli-Q Advantage A10 system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) with a resistivity higher than 18.2 MΩ cm−1.

2.2. Preparation of the SiO2 Nanoparticle Dispersion

Firstly, 5.0 g SiO2 nanoparticles were mixed with 50.0 mL water and ultrasonically dispersed for 30 min. Then, 2.0 mL KH-550 was added into the SiO2 nanoparticle dispersion, followed by stirring for 30 min and ultrasonic dispersion for 30 min. At last, 1.0 mL triethanolamine and 1.0 mL sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate were added into the dispersion, followed by stirring for 30 min and dispersing for 30 min, resulting in the SiO2 nanoparticle dispersion.

2.3. Preparation of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS Composite Filter Medium

Scheme 1 presents the fabrication processes of the nano-SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite material. A piece of PPS nonwoven placed in the suction filtration was washed by ethanol firstly and dried with air flow for 15 min (Scheme 1a). Then, 30.0 mL of PEI aqueous solution (5.0 g L−1) was added to the filter funnel, and half of it was slowly suction-filtered off, while the rest was kept for 5 min so that the PEI was adequately adsorbed on the PPS fibers. Subsequently, 30.0 mL of water was added and filtered to remove the unabsorbed PEI, resulting in the PEI/PPS composite (Scheme 1b). Then, 30.0 mL of PTFE dispersion (100 g L−1) was added and kept for another 5 min to make it thoroughly absorbed on the surface of the PEI layer through electrostatic interaction. Afterward, 30.0 mL of water was filtered to wash away the unassembled reagent, followed by drying in a flow of air for 15 min, yielding the PTFE/PEI/PPS composite (Scheme 1c). The deposition of the PTFE/PEI double layers was repeated 5 and 10 times, and the corresponding products produced were named (PTFE/PEI)5/PPS and (PTFE/PEI)10/PPS. For the synthesis of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite (Scheme 1d), SiO2 nanoparticles were deposited onto the surfaces of the PTFE layers by adding 30.0 mL of the pre-prepared SiO2 nanoparticle dispersion to the filter funnel and keeping for 15 min. At last, the as-deposited composites were baked in the dryer (Shenzhen Huaboxing Technology Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China) at 180 °C for 5 min, resulting in SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)5/PPS and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter media, respectively.

2.4. Characterizations

The mechanical property assessment was carried out on an INSTRON3365 instrument (INSTRON, Boston, MA, USA) with a speed of 100 mm min−1. The air permeability test was performed by using a YG461G instrument (NBFY, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China) operating at the pressure drop of 200 Pa, the area of 20.0 cm2 and the nozzle diameter of 4 mm. The wear resistance analysis was done according to ISO 12947-2:1998 (standard of International Organization for Standardization) by using the YG(B)401E Martindale pilling tester (DARONG, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China) working with a load of 700 g. The number of rubs at which specimen breakdown occurs was recorded to evaluate the wear resistance. The field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) micrographs and EDX data were acquired on a Hitachi SU-8010 instrument (acceleration voltage: 5.0 kV, HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) or 20.0 kV with an IXRF energy-dispersive spectrometer. The specimens for FE-SEM observation were cut into 1.50 × 1.50 cm2 rectangular sheets and sputtered with platinum to reduce charging. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping images were obtained on an OXFORD X-MaxN50 instrument (acceleration voltage: 15.0 kV, OXFORD, Oxford, UK). The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained on a Nicolet iS20 apparatus (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in the attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode. The differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analyses were performed on a Mettler Toledo STARe System DSC3 instrument (Mettler Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland) in the range of 40–450 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under N2 atmosphere. The thermogravimetric (TG) analyses were conducted on a Mettler Toledo STARe System TGA2 (Mettler Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland) in the range of 40–1100 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under N2 atmosphere. The nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms were measured on an Autosorb iQ instrument (bath temperature: 77 °C, Quantachrome, New York, NY, USA).

2.5. Dynamic Filtration Properties

The dynamic filtration properties of the filter media were evaluated on a FEMA 1 instrument (Fil T Eq, Karlsruhe, Germany), which was made according to VDI 3926:2004 (standard of Germany). Scheme 2 shows the schematic diagram of the test apparatus. At the beginning of the filtration process, the dust particles generated from the dust feeder pass through the vertical dirty-gas duct at a constant velocity of 2.0 m min−1, followed by being captured on the surface of the filter test sample and forming the dust cake, which could intercept the fine particulate matter efficiently. With the formation of the dust cake, the pressure drop gradually increases. When the predetermined maximum pressure-drop (1000 Pa) is reached, a cleaning pulse is activated to detach the dust cake towards the dirty-gas (upstream) side in order to regenerate the filter material. The test dust in the study was Pural NF, which contains 35% PM2.5, and the raw dust concentration was about 5.1 g m−3, which was monitored in real time through the photometric concentration monitor. The pulse-jet cleaning was performed at a compressed air pressure of 0.5 MPa and an electrical valve opening time of 60 ms. The whole test procedure was divided into four phases: conditioning, aging, stabilizing and measuring. In the conditioning phase, 30 loading cycles with pressure-drop controlled pulse-jet cleaning were performed with a cleaning set point of 1000 Pa. The first test phase was followed by the aging phase. The filter was exposed to 10,000 cleaning pulses at intervals of 5 s. Between the aging phase and the measuring phase, the stabilization phase (recovery of 10 loading cycles with pressure-drop controlled cleaning) was executed in order to stabilize the operating conditions and the test filter sample behavior. In the last measuring phase, several loading cycles with pressure-drop controlled pulse-jet cleaning were performed with a cleaning set point of 1000 Pa for 5 h. The PM2.5 was separated from clean gas through the PM2.5 cyclone separator. The flow rate of PM2.5 in the work was 0.85 m3 h−1. During the last phase of the test, a gravimetric evaluation of PM2.5 was performed for the calculation of the emission concentration of the PM2.5. Going through the entire test phase, the residual pressure-drop, cleaning cycle time and residual dust mass were analyzed to evaluate the relevant long-term operational properties (filtration and cleaning behavior) and emission of filter media.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical Properties of the Filter Media

The mechanical properties, air permeability and wear resistance are the main physical properties of the filter medium and directly influence its service life and filtration performance. As shown in Table 1, the meridional and latitudinal strength of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium are 1425.6 N and 1753.4 N, respectively, and are higher than those of the PPS filter medium and (PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite medium. The wear resistance of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS filter medium is 125 times, which increased by 66.7% as compared with that of the PPS filter medium. The improvement in the mechanical properties and wear resistance of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium indicates its service life will be prolonged. However, as compared with the PPS filter medium, the air permeability of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium decreased due to the deposition of SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers on the surfaces of the PPS fibers, which led to a narrower space between the fibers. Thanks to the three-dimensional network structures, the air permeability of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium was much better than that of the commercial PTFE membrane-coated PPS filter material.

3.2. Structural Characterizations of the Filter Media

As illustrated in Scheme 1, the PTFE/PEI double layers were deposited on the surfaces of the PPS fibers through the LbL self-assembly technique, and then the SiO2 nanoparticles were immobilized thereon to give the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite filter medium. The FE-SEM images of the PPS filter medium are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1a exhibits the low-magnification FE-SEM image of the sample, showing the three-dimensional network structure which consisted of microfibers with a diameter of ca. 15 μm. The high-magnification FE-SEM image shown in Figure 1b exhibits that the surface of the PPS filter medium was smooth.
Figure 2 shows the morphologies of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite filter medium with varied numbers of the PTFE/PEI bilayers produced by the self-assembly processes. The low-magnification FE-SEM images of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)5/PPS and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter media shown in Figure 2a,c indicate that the original three-dimensional network structures of the PPS filter medium were faithfully maintained. The high-magnification FE-SEM images of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)5/PPS and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter media are shown in Figure 2b,d. It was found that a part of the surface of the PPS filter fiber was naked when the number of the PTFE/PEI bilayers was five. By increasing the number of the PTFE/PEI bilayers to 10, the PPS microfibers were found to be almost completely coated with the SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers. It is noted that the SiO2/PTFE/PEI coating loaded on the surface of the PPS microfiber did not agglomerate, and there was no nanoparticle agglomerate between the spaces of the microfibers. The EDX analyses shown in Figure S1 (in Supplementary Materials) demonstrate that the composite filter media were composed of C, O, F, S and Si elements, and the amount of F element increased with the increase in the number of the PTFE/PEI bilayers; that is, the amount of PTFE component in the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite filter medium could be easily controlled by adjusting the number of the PTFE/PEI bilayers.
The elemental distributions of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium shown in the EDS mapping micrographs (Figure 3a–f) demonstrate the presence of C, O, F, S and Si elements in the composite filter medium. They reveal that the S element was mainly centered in the core region of the microfibers, while the F and Si elements were mostly distributed in the outer edges.
Figure 4a exhibits the FT-IR spectra of the pure PPS filter medium before and after oxidation treatment for 400 h. The bands located at 1570 and 1469 cm−1 are attributed to the nonsymmetric phenyl ring stretching modes (C6H6–S). The bands at 1383, 1089 and 1007 cm−1 are assigned to the C–S stretching and bending vibration. The strong absorption band centered at 807 cm−1 is ascribed to the bending vibration of para-disubstituted aromatic rings [52]. Moreover, the peaks at 1178 and 1070 cm−1 are assigned to the stretching vibration of –SO2– and –SO–, respectively. The existence of –SO– and –SO2– is because of the low bond energy of the C–S bond, which was easily oxidized during synthesis, drying and storage [53]. After the oxidation treatment for 400 h, a new band located at 1230 cm−1 appeared, which is attributed to the sulfite linkage (–O–SO–O–), indicating the oxidation of the PPS filter medium [54]. The spectra of the (PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium before and after oxidation treatment for 400 h are shown in Figure 4b. The bands located at 1571, 1470, 1384, 1090, 1008 and 808 cm−1 are attributed to the characteristic absorption of PPS, which is consistent with the pure PPS filter medium shown in Figure 4a. After the modification of PTFE, new bands located at 1207, 1152 and 639 cm−1 appeared, which are attributed to the –CF2– stretching and rocking vibrations [55,56]. This demonstrated that the PTFE was successfully self-assembled on the surfaces of the PPS fibers. It is worth noting that there is no apparent change of the absorption peak of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium after the oxidation treatment for 400 h, indicating that the deposition of PTFE/PEI bilayers inhibits the oxidation of the PPS filter medium.
Figure 5a exhibits the DSC curves of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium upon heating treatment at 450 °C. The endothermic peak located at 278.9 °C is assigned to the melting temperature of the PPS filter medium [33]. For the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium, two endothermic peaks located at 281.1 °C and 335.1 °C appeared, which are corresponding to the melting temperatures of PPS and PTFE, respectively. It is noted that the PPS melting temperature of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium is higher than that of the pure PPS filter medium due to the modification of SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers on the surfaces of the PPS fibers. In addition, the PTFE melting temperature of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium is also higher than its general melting point (327 °C) [57], indicating the PPS and PTFE had a synergy for heat resistance. The TG curves of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium shown in Figure 5b indicate two weight loss stages. It is observed that both filter media have good thermal stabilities, and the weight losses were less than 5% at 500 °C. The PPS filter medium begins decomposition at 508.1 °C. For the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium, the initial decomposition temperature is 526.9 °C, which is much higher than that of the PPS filter medium, demonstrating the improved heat resistance of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium.
The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium is shown in Figure 6a, which is corresponding to the type IV curves with typical hysteresis loops based on the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification. It was observed that the nitrogen adsorption capacity of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium was much higher than that of the pure PPS filter medium, indicating that there are more pores in the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium. When P/P0 > 0.9, the amount of nitrogen adsorption of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium increased sharply because of the capillary condensation. The existence of the H3 hysteresis loop in the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium indicates that there were a large number of slit-like and open pores [26]. The Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) surface area of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium was 24.419 m2 g−1 (Table S1), which was greatly improved as compared with that of the pure PPS filter medium due to the rougher surface and the large specific surface area of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI) multilayers deposited on the surfaces of the PPS fibers. Figure 6b exhibits that the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium has a hierarchical pore structure. The Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) adsorption summary pore volumes of the pure PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium were 0.004 and 0.034 cm3 g−1, respectively, indicating an enhancement of almost 9 times compared to the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium.

3.3. Dynamic Filtration Characterization of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS Composite Filter Medium

The dynamic filtration characterization of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium was investigated in a filter test apparatus mentioned in Section 2.5 by using the Pural NF as the test dust. At the beginning of the filtration process, the dust particles are captured on the surface of the filter and form the dust cake which prevents the dust emission [58]. Figure 7 shows the superimposed representation of the pressure-drop curves versus time of selected loading cycles of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium. It indicates that the pressure drop of both filter media increases gradually with time due to the formation of the dust cake. Because of the smooth surface of the PPS filter medium, the dusts direct penetrate through the filter material more easily than through the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium during the periods when the medium surface was not protected by the dust cake, resulting in low pressure-drop.
In order to regenerate the filter medium, the dust cake was frequently detached through the reverse-flow pulse-jet cleaning. However, the particles which had penetrated into the porous medium and the occurrence of patchy cleaning would lead to the existence of the residual dust layer; as a consequence, a pressure drop happened after cleaning. The pressure drop recorded across the filter medium shortly after the pulse-jet cleaning is called residual pressure-drop. It is desirable to have a low and stable residual pressure-drop during the filtration process. Figure 8a exhibits the development of residual pressure-drop versus time before and after aging of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium. The initial residual pressure-drop of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium was higher than that of the PPS filter medium due to the deposition of SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers, which led to the decrease in air permeability [59]. It was reported that the cleaning efficiency decreased with the increase in the number of cleaning cycles [60]. The residual pressure-drop of the two filter materials increases with the cycle in the conditioning phase (prior to aging). Therein, the residual pressure-drop of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium was higher than that of the PPS filter medium. This is because the SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers immobilized on the surfaces of the PPS fibers increase the specific surface area and pore volume, resulting in more dust being absorbed on the surfaces of the fibers, which led to the increase in the residual pressure-drop of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium. It is noted that the residual pressure-drop of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium prepared in this work was much lower than that of the reported PTFE/PPS composite filter medium due to the three-dimensional network structure inherited from the PPS [43]. After aging, the residual pressure-drop of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium rises much slower as compared with that of the PPS filter medium, and the residual pressure-drops of both are close to each other. This is because the PTFE layers coated on the surfaces of the PPS fibers possess low surface energy, which reduces the adhesion between the dust cake and filter material fiber and makes it easier for the dust to peel off [61].
Cleaning cycle time refers to the time interval between two reverse-flow pulse-jet cleanings of the filter material. The cleaning cycle time has an important influence on the lifetime of the filter material. The short cleaning cycle time means frequent cleaning, making the filter bag more vulnerable to being damaged. Figure 8b reveals that the cleaning cycle time of the PPS filter medium decreases rapidly, especially prior to aging. For the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium, the cleaning cycle time decreases more slowly. After aging, the cleaning cycle time of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium almost remains unchanged and is close to that of the PPS filter medium. This result indicates that the modification of PPS fibers with the SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers improves the stability of the modified PPS filter medium.
The filtration performances of different filter media were evaluated after aging. The PM2.5 emission concentration (CPM2.5) was calculated using the following Equation (1):
C PM 2.5 = m − m 0 Q × t ,
where the m0, m, Q and t correspond to the mass of the absolute filter before measuring, the mass of the absolute filter after measuring, the flow rate of PM2.5 and the measuring time, respectively. The filtration efficiency of PM2.5 (η) was calculated using the following Equation (2):
η = C dust × 0.35 − C PM 2.5 C dust × 0.35 × 100 %
where Cdust corresponds to the raw dust concentration. The results are listed in Table 2 and reveal that the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium have PM2.5 emission concentrations of 0.096 and 0.008 g m−3 and PM2.5 filtration efficiencies of 94.62% and 99.55%, respectively. This suggests that the filtration performance of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium is much better than that of the PPS filter medium. It was reported that the dust cake plays a predominant role in the filtration effect of fine particles. The dust emission concentrations of the pulse-jet cleaned filter materials were measured only during the periods following every cleaning pulse due to the absence of the dust cake, indicating an inconsecutive emission pattern [62]. It has been demonstrated that the SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers self-assembled on the surfaces of the PPS fibers increase the specific surface area and pore volume of the filter material, which is beneficial to the capture of the dust particles. Hence, the formation of the dust cake on the surface of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium occurs more easily than that of the PPS filter medium, resulting in intercepting the PM2.5 more efficiently, which led to lower PM2.5 emission concentration and enhanced filtration efficiency. In addition, the SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers deposited on the surfaces of the PPS fibers reduce the spaces between the fibers, which is in favor of the entrapment of the fine particulate matter. Moreover, the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium possesses excellent reusability owing to the low surface energy of the PTFE layers, which makes the dust cake easier to clean.
The results of wear resistance of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium after measuring are shown in Table S2, revealing that the wear resistance of SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium before and after measuring was almost unchanged, while that for the PPS filter medium decreases obviously. In addition, the TG curves of the filter media after measuring shown in Figure S2 exhibit that the initial decomposition temperatures of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium are 504.9 and 526.5 °C, respectively. The initial decomposition temperature of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium after measuring was almost unchanged as compared with that of before measuring, while that for the PPS filter medium decreases slightly, indicating excellent thermal stability of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium. The enhancement of the wear resistance and heat resistance of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium can prolong the service life of the filter material.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a cleanable SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite filter medium was prepared using the commercial PPS filter medium as the substrate via a layer-by-layer self-assembly approach. The SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite filter medium maintained the three-dimensional network structures of the original PPS filter medium, and the SiO2/PTFE/PEI multilayers were uniformly deposited on the surfaces of the PPS fibers. The contents of the PTFE component can be conveniently regulated by altering the number of the PTFE/PEI bilayers. The obtained SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium exhibits better mechanical properties and enhanced wear, oxidation and heat resistance as compared with the pure PPS filter medium. When used as the filter material, the composite filter medium showed outstanding filtration performance for fine particulate owing to the PTFE layers being beneficial not only to the formation of the dust cake, but also to the detachment of the dust cake during pulse-jet cleaning, resulting in high efficiency of fine particulate filtration and superior reusability. This strategy gives insight into the fabrication of functional filter materials with high efficiency and low resistance, which can be applied in the field of ultralow dust emission.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma14247853/s1, Figure S1: EDX analyses of (a) SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)5/PPS and (b) SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter media, Figure S2: TG curves of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium after measuring, Table S1: BET surface areas and BJH adsorption summary pore volumes of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium, Table S2: Wear resistance of the filter media after measuring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L.; methodology, Y.L., Z.S., Z.M., H.C.; X.W., M.L., R.W. and J.H.; investigation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Z.S. and J.H.; supervision, Z.S. and J.H.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Zhejiang Province Human Resources and Social Security Department (ZJ2020107).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Anderson, H.R.; Frostad, J.; Estep, K.; Balakrishnan, K.; Brunekreef, B.; Dandona, L.; Dandona, R.; et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389, 1907–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Burnett, R.K.; Chen, H.; Szyszkowicz, M.; Fann, N.; Hubbell, B.; Pope, C.A.; Apte, J.S.; Brauer, M.; Cohen, A.; Weichenthal, S.; et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 9592–9597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Geng, G.; Xiao, Q.; Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Cheng, J.; Zheng, Y.; Xue, T.; Tong, D.; Zheng, B.; Peng, Y.; et al. Tracking air pollution in China: Near real-time PM2.5 retrievals from multisource data fusion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 12106–12115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, X.; Pu, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, D.; Ning, X. Electrospun polymer composite membrane with superior thermal stability and excellent chemical resistance for high-efficiency PM2.5 capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 43188–43199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, B.; Zhang, Z.-G.; Yan, X.; Wang, X.-X.; Zhao, H.; Guo, J.; Feng, J.-Y.; Long, Y.-Z. Chitosan nanostructures by in situ electrospinning for high-efficiency PM2.5 capture. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 4154–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Robert, B.; Nallathambi, G. A concise review on electrospun nanofibres/nanonets for filtration of gaseous and solid constituents (PM2.5) from polluted air. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2020, 37, 100275–100286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sobczyk, A.T.; Marchewicz, A.; Krupa, A.; Jaworek, A.; Czech, T.; Śliwiński, Ł.; Kluk, D.; Ottawa, A.; Charchalis, A. Enhancement of collection efficiency for fly ash particles (PM2.5) by unipolar agglomerator in two-stage electrostatic precipitator. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 187, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jaworek, A.; Marchewicz, A.; Sobczyk, A.T.; Krupa, A.; Czech, T. Two-stage electrostatic precipitators for the reduction of PM2.5 particle emission. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2018, 67, 206–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, Y.; Tao, S.; Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Chen, M.; Shangguan, W. Highly effective removal of PM2.5 from combustion products: An application of integrated two-stage electrostatic precipitator. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 424, 130569–130581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dai, Z.; Su, J.; Zhu, X.; Xu, K.; Zhu, J.; Huang, C.; Ke, Q. Multifunctional polyethylene (PE)/polypropylene (PP) bicomponent fiber filter with anchored nanocrystalline MnO2 for effective air purification. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 14856–14866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Hou, J.; Wang, Y.; Deng, C.; Huang, C.; Jin, X. Multi-layered, corona charged melt blown nonwovens as high performance PM0.3 air filters. Polymers 2021, 13, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hao, Z.; Wu, J.; Wang, C.; Liu, J. Electrospun polyimide/metal-organic framework nanofibrous membrane with superior thermal stability for efficient PM2.5 capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 11904–11909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Cao, S.; Li, S.; Chen, F.; Yuan, S.; Xu, C.; Zhou, J.; Feng, X.; Ma, X.; et al. Roll-to-roll production of metal-organic framework coatings for particulate matter removal. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606221–1606226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Y.; He, X.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, W.-N.; Chen, S.-C. Simultaneous removal of VOCs and PM2.5 by metal-organic framework coated electret filter media. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 618, 118629–118639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ravi, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Suresh, L.; Ku, C.; Sanjairaj, V.; Nandakumar, D.K.; Chen, Y.; Sun, W.; Sit, P.H.-L.; Tan, S.C. Hydro-assisted self-regenerating brominated N-alkylated thiophene diketopyrrolopyrrole dye nanofibers—A sustainable synthesis route for renewable air filter materials. Small 2020, 16, 1906319–1906327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, L.; Huang, C.; Wu, H.; Wang, R.; Jin, X. Low resistance bicomponent spunbond materials for fresh air filtration with ultra-high dust holding capacity. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 43879–43887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhu, X.; Dai, Z.; Xu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Ke, Q. Fabrication of multifunctional filters via online incorporating nano-TiO2 into spun-bonded/melt-blown nonwovens for air filtration and toluene degradation. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2019, 304, 1900350–1900360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Gong, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Jin, X. Polyethylene/polypropylene bicomponent spunbond air filtration materials containing magnesium stearate for efficient fine particle capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 40592–40601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dixit, P.; Ishtiaque, S.M.; Roy, R. Influence of sequential punching in layered structure of needle punched nonwoven on the filtration behavior. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 182, 107654–107664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; Qian, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Zou, C.; Cui, Y. Preparing micro/nano-fibrous filters for effective PM 2.5 under low filtration resistance. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 217, 115523–115533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sakthivel, S.; Ezhil, A.J.J. Ramachandran, T. Development of needle-punched nonwoven fabrics from reclaimed fibers for air filtration applications. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2014, 9, 149–154. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu, B.; Han, J.; He, X.; Xu, G.; Ding, X. Effects of tourmaline particles on structure and properties of polypropylene filtration melt-blown nonwoven electrets. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2012, 51, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, S.; Muhaiminul, A.S.M.; Yue, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Militky, J.; Prasad, M.; Zhu, G. Effect of temperature on the structure and filtration performance of polypropylene melt-blown nonwovens. AUTEX Res. J. 2021, 21, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Chen, G.; Bhat, G.S.; Azari, H.; Pen, H. Electret characteristics of melt-blown polylactic acid fabrics for air filtration application. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48309–48314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, D.; Shen, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, F.; Deng, B.; Liu, Q. Hierarchical structured polyimide–silica hybrid nano/microfiber filters welded by solvent vapor for air filtration. Polymers 2020, 12, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, C.; Jin, X. Polytetrafluoroethylene/polyphenylene sulfide needle-punched triboelectric air filter for efficient particulate matter removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 48437–48449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Huang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, Y.; Jin, X. Design of three-dimensional gradient nonwoven composites with robust dust holding capacity for air filtration. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47827–47835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, Q.; Wang, G.; Xiang, C.; Cong, X.; Gai, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Luan, J. Preparation of a novel poly (ether ether ketone) nonwoven filter and its application in harsh conditions for dust removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 253, 117555–117565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, K.; Deng, J.; Lin, R.; Zhang, H.; Ke, Q.; Huang, C. Surface fibrillation of para-aramid nonwoven as a multi-functional air filter with ultralow pressure drop. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 22269–22279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thangadurai, K.; Thilagavathi, G.; Bhattacharyya, A. Characterization of needle-punched nonwoven fabrics for industrial air filter application. J. Text. Inst. 2014, 105, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ju, L.; Li, F.; Zhou, R.; He, H.; Chen, F.; Liu, Q.; Ning, X.; Qi, G.; Song, C. Manganese oxides decorated polyphenylene sulfide needle-punching fibrous felts: A new composite for dust removal and denitration application. Fibers Polym. 2021, 22, 2483–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mukhopadhyay, A.; Pandit, V.; Dhawan, K. Effect of high temperature on the performance of filter fabric. J. Ind. Text. 2015, 45, 1587–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zuo, P.; Benevides, R.C.; Laribi, M.A.; Fitoussi, J.; Shirinbayan, M.; Bakir, F.; Tcharkhtchi, A. Multi-scale analysis of the effect of loading conditions on monotonic and fatigue behavior of a glass fiber reinforced polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) composite. Compos. Part B. Eng. 2018, 145, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, Y.; Meng, Y.; Zhu, Y. The fabrication, nano/micro-structure, heat- and wear-resistance of the superhydrophobic PPS/PTFE composite coatings. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 402, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, H.; Jiang, D.; Liu, Y. Life problem analysis on PPS filter application of bag dedusters in coal-fired power plants. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 236–238, 2464–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lian, D.; Zhang, R.; Lu, J.; Dai, J. Performances and structure changes of neat PPS fiber and nano Ti-SiO2-modified PPS fiber after over-temperature oxidation. High Perform. Polym. 2017, 30, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lian, D.; Ren, J.; Han, W.; Ge, C.; Lu, J. Kinetics and evolved gas analysis of the thermo-oxidative decomposition for neat PPS fiber and nano Ti–SiO2 modified PPS fiber. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1196, 734–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, L.; Shang, L.; Li, Y.; Yang, C. Three-layer composite filter media containing electrospun polyimide nanofibers for the removal of fine particles. Fibers Polym. 2017, 18, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brown, E.N.; Dattelbaumb, D.M. The role of crystalline phase on fracture and microstructure evolution of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Polymer 2005, 46, 3056–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lu, X.-C.; Wen, S.-Z.; Tong, J.; Chen, Y.-T.; Ren, L.-Q. Wettability, soil adhesion, abrasion and friction wear of PTFE (+ PPS) + Al2O3 composites. Wear 1996, 193, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, G.; Ouyang, J.; Jia, D.; Zhou, Y. A self-adjusting PTFE/TiO2 hydrophobic double-layer coating for corrosion resistance and electrical insulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 402, 126116–126127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, D.; Liu, H.; Shen, Y.; Wu, H.; Liu, F.; Wang, L.; Liu, Q.; Deng, B. Preparation of PI/PTFE–PAI composite nanofiber aerogels with hierarchical structure and high-filtration efficiency. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, N.; Jin, X.; Huang, C.; Ke, Q. Improved filtration properties of hydroentangled PTFE/PPS fabric filters caused by fibrillation. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 2017, 42, 278–285. [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang, T.; Lü, R.; Ma, Y.; Liu, P.; Li, T. Study on the friction and sliding wear behavior of hybrid polytetrafluoroethylene/kevlar fabric composites filled with polyphenylene sulfide. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2012, 51, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yu, B.; Han, J.; Zhang, Q.; He, X.; Xu, G. Effect of finishing on the structure and filtration property of PPS filter. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 217–218, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, X.; Chen, K.; Zhang, D.; Guo, Z. Stable and durable conductive superhydrophobic coatings prepared by double-layer spray coating method. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, X.; Wang, X.-X.; Yue, T.-T.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, M.-L.; Yu, M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Long, Y.-Z. Waterproof-breathable PTFE nano- and microfiber membrane as high efficiency PM2.5 filter. Polymers 2019, 11, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Su, J.; Yang, G.; Cheng, C.; Huang, C.; Xu, H.; Ke, Q. Hierarchically structured TiO2/PAN nanfibrous membranes for high-efficiency air filtration and toluene degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 507, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chang, D.-Q.; Tien, C.-Y.; Peng, C.-Y.; Tang, M.; Chen, S.-C. Development of composite filters with high efficiency, low pressure-drop, and high holding capacity PM2.5 filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 212, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, B.; Lin, Z.; Huang, J. A bio-inspired nanotubular Na2MoO4/TiO2 composite as a high-performance anodic material for lithium-ion batteries. Materials 2021, 14, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shi, L.; Hu, J.; Lin, X.; Fang, L.; Wu, F.; Xie, J.; Meng, F. A robust superhydrophobic PPS-PTFE/SiO2 composite coating on AZ31 Mg alloy with excellent wear and corrosion resistance properties. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 721, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lv, Y.-R.; He, H.-W.; Chen, F.-X.; Yu, J.; Ning, X.; Zhou, R. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) fibrous felt coated with conductive polyaniline via in situ polymerization for smart high temperature bag-filter. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 075706–075714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xing, J.; Xu, Z.; Deng, B. Enhanced oxidation resistance of polyphenylene sulfide composites based on montmorillonite modified by benzimidazolium salt. Polymers 2018, 10, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Sugama, T. Polyphenylenesulfied/montomorillonite clay nanocomposite coatings: Their efficacy in protecting steel against corrosion. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 2700–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Xu, H.; Jin, W.; Wang, F.; Liu, G.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Zhu, H.; Guo, Y. Formation and characterization of polytetrafluoroethylene nanofiber membranes for high-efficiency fine particulate filtration. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 13631–13645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Yuan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, M.; Li, P.; Jiang, W.; Zhao, X.; Liu, W. Enhanced high-temperature tribological performance of PTFE/PI fabric composites by simultaneously introducing PDA/SiO2 hybrid coating and aramid product reinforcements. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42, 3539–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pamphilis, N.A. Compositional analysis of polyphenylene sulfide containing PTFE and carbon fibers. Thermochim. Acta 1989, 142, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Binnig, J.; Meyer, J.; Kasper, G. Origin and mechanisms of dust emission from pulse-jet cleaned filter media. Powder Technol. 2009, 189, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saleem, M.; Krammer, G. Effect of filtration velocity and dust concentration on cake formation and filter operation in a pilot scale jet pulsed bag filter. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 144, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Brummer, V.; Jecha, D.; Lestinsky, P.; Skryja, P.; Gregor, J.; Stehlik, P. The treatment of waste gas from fertilizer production—An industrial case study of long term removing particulate matter with a pilot unit. Powder Technol. 2016, 297, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Q.; Schmidt, E. Modelling of particle layer detachment—Role of transient kinetic effects. Particuology 2009, 7, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kurtz, O.; Meyer, J.; Kasper, G. The contribution of small leaks in a baghouse filter to dust emission in the PM2.5 range—A system approach. Particuology 2017, 30, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 07853 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the synthetic processes for the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite. (a) The PPS nonwoven substrate. (b) The PEI/PPS composite was obtained by depositing the PEI layer onto the surface of the PPS fiber. (c) The PTFE/PEI/PPS composite was prepared by depositing the PTFE layer onto the surface of the PEI/PPS composite fiber through electrostatic interaction. (d) The SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite was prepared by repeating the deposition of the PTFE/PEI double-layer several times, followed by the deposition of the SiO2 nanoparticles.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the synthetic processes for the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite. (a) The PPS nonwoven substrate. (b) The PEI/PPS composite was obtained by depositing the PEI layer onto the surface of the PPS fiber. (c) The PTFE/PEI/PPS composite was prepared by depositing the PTFE layer onto the surface of the PEI/PPS composite fiber through electrostatic interaction. (d) The SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite was prepared by repeating the deposition of the PTFE/PEI double-layer several times, followed by the deposition of the SiO2 nanoparticles.
Materials 14 07853 sch001
Materials 14 07853 sch002 550
Scheme 2. The schematic diagram of the test apparatus according to VDI 3926:2004.
Scheme 2. The schematic diagram of the test apparatus according to VDI 3926:2004.
Materials 14 07853 sch002
Materials 14 07853 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Low-magnification field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) micrograph and (b) high-magnification FE-SEM images of the PPS filter medium.
Figure 1. (a) Low-magnification field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) micrograph and (b) high-magnification FE-SEM images of the PPS filter medium.
Materials 14 07853 g001
Materials 14 07853 g002 550
Figure 2. FE-SEM images of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite filter media with varied magnifications: (a,b) SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)5/PPS; (c,d) SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS.
Figure 2. FE-SEM images of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS composite filter media with varied magnifications: (a,b) SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)5/PPS; (c,d) SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS.
Materials 14 07853 g002
Materials 14 07853 g003 550
Figure 3. The EDS elemental mapping of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium: (a) FE-SEM image before mapping; (b) S, (c) C, (d) F, (e) O and (f) Si elements.
Figure 3. The EDS elemental mapping of the SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium: (a) FE-SEM image before mapping; (b) S, (c) C, (d) F, (e) O and (f) Si elements.
Materials 14 07853 g003
Materials 14 07853 g004 550
Figure 4. The FT-IR spectra of (a) PPS filter medium and (b) (PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium before and after oxidation treatment for 400 h.
Figure 4. The FT-IR spectra of (a) PPS filter medium and (b) (PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium before and after oxidation treatment for 400 h.
Materials 14 07853 g004
Materials 14 07853 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) DSC and (b) TG curves of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium.
Figure 5. (a) DSC and (b) TG curves of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium.
Materials 14 07853 g005
Materials 14 07853 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distributions of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium.
Figure 6. (a) Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distributions of the PPS filter medium and SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS composite filter medium.
Materials 14 07853 g006
Materials 14 07853 g007 550
Figure 7. The superimposed representation of the pressure-drop curves versus time of selected loading cycles of different filter media: (a) PPS and (b) SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS.
Figure 7. The superimposed representation of the pressure-drop curves versus time of selected loading cycles of different filter media: (a) PPS and (b) SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS.
Materials 14 07853 g007
Materials 14 07853 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Development of residual pressure-drop versus time and (b) development of cycle duration versus time before and after aging.
Figure 8. (a) Development of residual pressure-drop versus time and (b) development of cycle duration versus time before and after aging.
Materials 14 07853 g008
Table
Table 1. The physical properties of the filter media.
Table 1. The physical properties of the filter media.
Filter MediaMeridional Strength
(N)		Latitudinal Strength
(N)		Air Permeability
(L dm−2 min−1)		Wear Resistance
(Times)
PPS1318.91681.5289.675
(PTFE/PEI)10PPS1413.41704.7264.2101
SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS1425.61753.4259.7125
PTFE membrane-coated PPS1434.71765.3179.799
Table
Table 2. Filtration performance of different filter media after aging.
Table 2. Filtration performance of different filter media after aging.
Filter MediaThe Mass of the Absolute Filter before Measuring (g)The Mass of the Absolute Filter after Measuring (g)PM2.5 Emission Concentration
(g m−3)		Filtration Efficiency (%)
PPS0.144350.552350.09694.62
SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)10/PPS0.148040.182040.00899.55
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, Y.; Shen, Z.; Ma, Z.; Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Luo, M.; Wang, R.; Huang, J. A Cleanable Self-Assembled Nano-SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS Composite Filter Medium for High-Efficiency Fine Particulate Filtration. Materials 2021, 14, 7853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247853

AMA Style

Luo Y, Shen Z, Ma Z, Chen H, Wang X, Luo M, Wang R, Huang J. A Cleanable Self-Assembled Nano-SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS Composite Filter Medium for High-Efficiency Fine Particulate Filtration. Materials. 2021; 14(24):7853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247853

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Yan, Zhongyun Shen, Zhihao Ma, Hongfeng Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Minger Luo, Ran Wang, and Jianguo Huang. 2021. "A Cleanable Self-Assembled Nano-SiO2/(PTFE/PEI)n/PPS Composite Filter Medium for High-Efficiency Fine Particulate Filtration" Materials 14, no. 24: 7853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247853

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop