Next Article in Journal
Study on X-ray Emission Using Ultrashort Pulsed Lasers in Materials Processing
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Annealing Temperatures on Selected Properties of WC/C Coatings, Deposited Using Hexacarbonyl Wolfram in an N2-SiH4 Atmosphere
Previous Article in Journal
Electrophoretically Deposited Chitosan/Eudragit E 100/AgNPs Composite Coatings on Titanium Substrate as a Silver Release System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth and Investigation of Annealing Effects on Ternary Cd1−xMgxO Nanocomposit Thin Films

1
Department of Physics, Riphah International University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
2
Optics Laboratories, P.O. Box 1021, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology China, Hefei 230026, China
4
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
5
Faculty of Materials and Manufacturing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
6
Department of Physics, Government College Hayatabad, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
7
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(16), 4538; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164538
Submission received: 16 July 2021 / Revised: 4 August 2021 / Accepted: 9 August 2021 / Published: 12 August 2021

Abstract

:
Thin films of Cd1−xMgxO (CdMgO) (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) were investigated by depositing the films on glass substrates using the co-evaporation technique. The structural, surface morphological, optical, and electrical characteristics of these films were studied as a function of Mg content after annealing at 350 °C. The XRD analysis showed that the deposited films had an amorphous nature. The grain size of the films reduced as the Mg concentration increased, as evidenced by the surface morphology, and EDAX supported the existence of Mg content. It was observed that as the films were annealed, the transmittance of the CdMgO films saw an increase of up to 85%. The blue shift of the absorption edge was observed by the increase of Mg content, which was useful for enhancing the efficiency of solar cells. The optical band gap increased from 2.45 to 6.02 eV as the Mg content increased. With increased Mg content, the refractive index reduced from 2.49 to 1.735, and electrical resistivity increased from 535 Ω cm to 1.57 × 106 Ω cm.

1. Introduction

Over the last two decades, the electronic industry has progressed drastically and, for materials scientists, has reached new horizons in the field of optoelectronics. The group II-VI elements have special importance for optoelectronics and chalcogenide semiconductors of this group such as Cd, Mg and Zn; their ternary alloys; and their oxides [1,2,3,4] are studied widely due to their excessive use in solar cells, photodetectors, photodiodes, gas sensors, transparent electrodes, and photo transistors [5,6,7,8,9,10], etc. There are few reports which regard CdO and MgO as a CdMgO ternary alloy. The compound CdO is a conducting material with a direct band gap of ~2.5 eV [11]. It shows transparent behavior in the visible region of electromagnetic spectrum. It has a cubic structure similar to rock salt, randomly oriented along the (111) plane and has a lattice constant of 4.70 Å. The compound CdO is a highly electrically conductive material owing to its increased concentration (~1021 cm−3) of free charge carriers. On the other hand, MgO has a rock-salt-like structure with a high band gap of 7.8 eV [12]. Its lattice constant is a = 4.24 Å, which is 1.11 times less than CdO. The compound MgO is a chemically and thermally stable oxide with a variety of applications in material science and technology. It also acts as a buffer layer for several materials such as metals, semiconductors and in many optoelectronics devices. However, CdO is not an efficient material for photovoltaics and optoelectronics due to its low optical band gap. It is reported that there are several dopants including indium, fluorine, lead, zinc, copper and gadolinium to improve the optical band gap of CdO [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Hence, by using MgO, which has a direct band gap of 7.8 eV with CdO, the optical band gap and UV luminescence may be modulated. The ions of Cd++ can be replaced with Mg++ ions to improve the electrical and optical characteristics of CdMgO. Consequently, the ternary combination CdMgO, which has a wide tunable band gap range of 2.5 to 7.8 eV, can be considered as a suitable compound for a buffer layer in solar cells and other optoelectronic devices. Despite their ability to tune the energy band gap, CdMgO films have received little attention. Only a few studies on the structural, morphological, electrical, and optical aspects of CdMgO thin films have been reported.
Different techniques have been used to fabricate CdMgO thin films such as radio frequency magnetron sputtering [19], the spray pyrolysis technique [20], metal organic chemical vapour deposition [21,22], and plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy [23]. However, these techniques are fairly expensive. As a result, a cost-effective and very simple approach for fabricating these films with improved properties is required.
In this work, the deposition of CdMgO (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) thin films is performed using the co-evaporation technique. To best of our knowledge, work on CdMgO thin films in the full range of composition by using the co-evaporation technique has not yet been reported. Furthermore, only a limited number of appropriate materials are accessible for the design of optical coatings. As a result, optical coating designers are constantly searching for new materials which are environmentally friendly and cost-effective, and have the appropriate refractive indices and minimal optical losses. The compond of CdMgO is a potential material that could be used in optical coatings and optoelectronic devices.

2. Experimental Procedure

The allot thin films of Cd1−xMgxO (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) were fabricated by co-evaporating CdO and MgO materials while regulating the rate of evaporation in a variety of molar concentrations (x = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00). The MgO material was palletized into 2.5 mm wide discs with a 15 mm diameter using a hydraulic press. For almost 10 h, these discs were sintered at 1000 °C. The requisite thin films were deposited on soda lime glass substrates. To eliminate contaminants, these substrates were immersed in a concentrated H2SO4 solution for 12 h. These glass substrates were cleaned in an ultrasonic cleaner using acetone and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) after being thoroughly cleaned with detergent and washed in running water.

2.1. Sample Preparation

The films were deposited using an Edward E610A high vacuum coating equipment. The compound CdO was evaporated in a molybdenum boat, whereas MgO was evaporated in a tungsten boat using an electron beam. The chamber was evacuated to a pressure of (~1.1 × 10−5 mbar). The partial pressure of oxygen (~2.3 × 10−4 mbar) was fixed during the course of deposition. All of the films were made at ambient temperature (25 °C). Before deposition the chamber was heated up to 200 °C for degassing from the substrate surface. After cooling glow discharge to eliminate contaminants from the substrates, the chamber was brought to normal temperature. The substrates were revolved at 15 rpm to ensure homogeneous deposition. The film thickness and growth rate were monitored using a quartz crystal monitor FTM 7. The average thicknesses of the films were in the range 500–600 nm. The transmittance of the films was measured using Perkin Elmer Lambda 19 UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer and the software UV Win Lab. The transmittance data band gap and refractive indices of all these films were evaluated after they were fitted.

2.2. Characterization Techniques

The structural study of the aforementioned films was carried out at room temperature using a Bruker D8 discover diffractometer coupled with Cu Kα radiation in the scanning mode with 2θ ranging from 20 to 80°. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) TESCANMAIA3 with an Octane Elite EDAX detector was used to investigate the morphological aspects of the films. A high vacuum with suitably maintained acceleration voltages was used to investigate the surface of samples. The Energy dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDAX) investigation for compositional analysis was executed at 20 kV voltage. The electrical resistivity of films was measured with a Keithly 2410-C, 1100 source meter using a two-probe approach.

3. Results and Discussion

The thin films of CdO, MgO and CdMgO deposited at room temperature were found to be physically stable. No peel off, blisters or pinholes were present on the surface of the thin films. Furthermore, a simple tape test was performed on the films to check the adhesion of the films with the glass substrate and found that the films were fully intact with substrate. The deposition parameters had a strong influence on the adhesion of the films with the substrate, along with its quality and cleaning. The parameters were optimized after many trials to achieve a successful adhesion of the films with the substrates. The as-deposited films were annealed at 350 °C (optimized temperature) for three hours in air. After annealing, the transparency of the films improved significantly, as shown in Figure 1, and the color of the films changed from dark brownish to bright yellowish.

3.1. Structural Properties

The as-deposited CdMgO films were found to be amorphous in nature. The amorphous nature of the CdMgO films was attributed to the low-energy growth process, which was carried out at 25 °C. At low substrate temperature, the mobility of atomic species in thin films is insufficient to form an ordered structure. After annealing at 350 °C, the CdO and MgO films were converted to a polycrystalline nature where as CdMgO films again showed amorphous behavior (Figure 2). The amorphous behavior of CdMgO, even after annealing, was attributed to stresses in the films due to the radii difference between Cd and Mg ions.
The lattice constants, diffraction angles of major peaks and crystallite sizes of CdO and MgO thin films are summarized in Table 1.

3.2. Surface Morphology

Figure 3 shows the surface morphology of the annealed thin films. Figure 3a shows the surface morphology of CdO (undoped) films with interconnected spherical grains and some spaces. Figure 3b–e displays the influence of Mg concentration deposited on the CdO films; the grains started to modify into small nanocrystals/nanostructures throughout the whole surface of CdMgO. With the further increase of Mg content, images revealed that films became denser and more compact, which is required in photovoltaic applications to increase their efficiency.
The amount of Mg deposited on the CdMgO thin films is revealed by EDX as shown in Figure 4a–d. With the increase in MgO evaporation, the concentration of Mg content in the films increased. There are some peaks of silicon which may have appeared due to the glass substrate. The atomic percentage composition of elements is shown in Table 2.

3.3. Optical Properties

The following equation [24], was used to elaborate the optical parameters of CdMgO thin films.
T = A x B C x cos ϕ + D x 2 ,  
  • For such a type of semiconductor thin film, “T” represents the system’s typical transmittance [24]. The various variables are specified as follows: x = exp(−αd), ϕ = 4 π nd/ λ , A = 16 n2s, B = (n + 1)3(n + s2), C = 2(n2 − 1)(n2s2), D = (n − 1)3 (ns2). Here
  • n = the film refractive index
  • s = the refractive index of the glass substrate
  • d = film thickness
  • α = the film’s absorption coefficient
The empirical formula for n is provided as [24,25]:
n = a + b λ 2   ( a ,   b   are   constants )
The formula for α dependence of λ can be given as:
α = c + f λ + g λ 2   ( c ,   f   and   g   are   constants )
The fit of Equation (1) to the transmittance plot of a representative Cd0.5Mg0.5O film is shown in Figure 5, revealing that Equation (1) offers a satisfactory correlation with the curve. In the high absorption zone, α was computed using the values of n and d determined from the fitted curve. The precise solution of Equation (1) for x in this scenario is:
x = [ C cos ( ϕ ) + A / T ] [ ( C cos ( ϕ ) + A / T ) 2 4 B D ] 1 / 2 2 D α = 1 d ln ( x )
All of these parameters are defined above.
Figure 6 depicts the fluctuation in transmittance data of CdMgO thin films from 200 to 1300 nm in the ultraviolet, visible and infrared regions. The spectra shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 are plotted after subtracting glass transmittance values from the thin film’s transmittance.
The transmittance spectra of the films revealed that interference fringes lied in each spectrum. Two epilayers lied in the spectra: air-related and substrate-related epilayers. Interference between these interfaces took place and fringes appeared in the transmission spectra. When the Mg content of the films increased after annealing, the transmittance of the films increased by more than 80%. With the increase in Mg content, the absorption edge shifted toward a shorter wavelength. The Mg quantity in the samples caused structural changes, which ultimately shifted the absorption edge and band gap.
The direct energy band gap, Eg, was calculated by using the well-recognized Tauc relation [25] α h ν = ( h ν E g ) 1 / 2 , where represents the photon energy. The energy band gap of CdMgO was estimated by extrapolating the linear portion of (αhν)2 vs. (hν) curves to (αhν)2 = 0.
The energy band gap of CdMgO increased from 2.45 to 6.02 eV when the Mg concentration increased, as seen in Figure 7a–e.
Figure 8 demonstrates how the energy band gap changes as the Mg content rises. The broadening of the band gap was associated with the smaller radii of Mg ions as compared with Cd ions. The size of the lattice constants reduced as the Mg content in CdMgO films increased, and the interaction between the wave functions associated with the valence electrons increased, resulting in a broadening of the energy band gap [26]. The refractive index of the films decreased from 2.49 to 1.74 with the increase of Mg content. This could have been related to a change in grain arrangement and an increase in strain in the film.

3.4. Electrical Properties

Figure 9 shows the electrical resistivity of CdMgO thin films with increasing Mg content; the electrical resistivity of CdMgO proportionally to Mg content, from 535 Ω cm for pure CdO to 1.57 × 106 Ω cm for CdMgO. This rise in resistivity was due to the increase in the band gap energies which occurred with the increase in Mg content in the films. The other factors for the increase in resistivity were due to the presence of oxygen vacancies, the reduction in the Cd interstitial site in the films and the increase in grain boundaries.

4. Conclusions

A detailed examination was conducted into the production of CdMgO thin films, utilizing the co-evaporation technique on soda lime glass substrates with a wide range of Mg content. It was investigated how magnesium content affected structural, morphological, optical, and electrical properties. X-ray diffraction showed that using the co-evaporation technique revealed that the thin films had amorphous behavior. SEM scans revealed that when the Mg content of the films increased, the surface morphology of the films improved, as did the transparency of the films. The energy band gap increased from 2.45 to 6.02 eV. With increased Mg concentration, the films’ refractive index reduced and their electrical resistance increased. The fabricated thin films of CdMgO could be a promising material used to create new optoelectronic devices, new coating materials, and for implementing in solar cell applications, based on the results of this study.

Author Contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. K.B. prepared samples and Writing Original Draft of the manuscript. N.M. supervises this research. M.A. and A.F.K. helps in Methodology and measurements. A.Z. and A.A. did the final writing review, corrections, and editing. F.S. and M.M. prepared content analysis and graphical arrangements. S.U. helps in Software and Validation. K.A. Formal analysis and provide Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/241), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mahmoud, W.E.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A. Synthesis of CdZnO thin film as a potential candidate for optical switches. Opt. Laser Technol. 2010, 427, 1134–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bakke, J.R.; Hägglund, C.; Jung, H.J.; Sinclair, R.; Bent, S.F. Atomic layer deposition of CdO and CdxZn1−xO films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 140, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huso, J.; Morrison, J.L.; Che, H.; Sundararajan, J.P.; Yeh, W.J.; McIlroy, D.; Bergman, L. ZnO and MgZnO nanocrystalline flexible films: Optical and material properties. J. Nanomater. 2011, 2011, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Achary, S.R.; Agouram, S.; Sánchez-Royo, J.F.; Lopez-Ponce, M.; Ulloa, J.M.; Muñoz, E.; Muñoz-Sanjose, V. Self-assembled Mgx Zn1−xO quantum dots (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) on different substrates using spray pyrolysis methodology. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ashraf, M.; Akhtar, S.M.J.; Qayyum, A. Characterization of ternary MgxZn1−xO thin films deposited by electron beam evaporation. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2012, 15, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Champness, C.H.; Xu, Z. Effect of CdO interlayer on electrical characteristics in SeBi diodes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1998, 123, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yildirim, M.A.; Ates, A. Structural, optical and electrical properties of CdO/Cd (OH)2 thin films grown by the SILAR method. Sens. Actuators A 2009, 155, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vossen, J.L.; Hass, I.G.; Francombe, M.H.; Hoffman, R.W. (Eds.) Physics of Thin Solid Films; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1977; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Subrayaman, T.K.; Krishna, B.R.; Uthanna, S.; Naidu, B.S.; Reddy, P.J. Influence of oxygen pressure on the physical properties of dc magnetron reactive sputtered cadmium oxide films. Vacuum 1997, 48, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dantus, C.; Rusu, G.G.; Dobromir, M.; Rusu, M. Preparation and characterization of CdO thin films obtained by thermal oxidation of evaporated Cd thin films. Appl. Surface Sci. 2008, 255, 2665–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saha, B.; Thapa, R.; Chattopadhyay, K.K. Bandgap widening in highly conducting CdO thin film by Ti incorporation through radio frequency magnetron sputtering technique. Solid State Commun. 2008, 145, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, Y.; Liu, C.P.; Yu, K.M.; Walukiewiew, W. Engineering electronic band structure of Indium-doped Cd1−xMgxO alloys for solar power conversion applications. Energy Technol. 2018, 6, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Flores-Mendoza, M.A.; Castanedo-Perez, R.; Torres-Delgado, G.; Rodriguez-Fragoso, P.; Mondoza-Alvarez, J.G. Photoluminescence in undoped (CdO)1−x–(InO3/2)x thin films at room temperature, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1. J. Lumin. 2013, 135, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deokate, R.J.; Pawar, S.M.; Moholkar, A.V.; Sawant, V.S.; Pawar, C.A.; Bhosale, C.H.; Rajpure, K.Y. Spray deposition of highly transparent fluorine doped cadmium oxide thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 2187–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Leon-Gutierrez, L.R.; Cayente-Remero, J.J.; Peza-Tapia, J.M.; Barrera-Calva, E.; Martinez-Flores, J.C.; Ortega-Lopez, M. Some physical properties of Sn-doped CdO thin films prepared by chemical bath deposition. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 3866–3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Usharani, K.; Balu, A.R. Structural, optical, and electrical properties of Zn-doped CdO thin films fabricated by a simplified spray pyrolysis technique. Acta Metall. Sin. 2015, 28, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bonhaliliba, M.; Benouis, C.E.; Tiburcio-Silver, A.; Yakuphanoglu, F.; Avila-Garciad, A.; Tavira, A.; Trujillo, R.R.; Mouffak, Z. Luminescence and physical properties of copper doped CdO derived nanostructures. J. Lumin. 2012, 132, 2653–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pan, L.L.; Li, G.Y.; Lian, J.S. Structural, optical and electrical properties of cerium and gadolinium doped CdO thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 274, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, G.; Yu, K.M.; Reichertz, L.A.; Walukiewicz, W. Material properties of Cd1−xMgxO alloys synthesized by radio frequency sputtering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 041902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Usharani, K.; Balun, A.R.; Nagarethinam, V.S.; Suganya, M. Characteristic analysis on the physical properties of nanostructured Mg-doped CdO thin films-Doping concentration effect. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2015, 25, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Guia, L.M.; Sallet, V.; Sartel, C.; Martínez-Tomás, M.C.; Muñoz-Sanjosé, V. Growth and characterization of Mg1−xCdxO thin films. Phys. Status Solidi C 2016, 13, 452–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Przezdziecka, E.; Wierzbicka, A.; Dłuzewski, P.; Sankowska, I.; Sybilski, P.; Morawiec, K.; Pietrzyk, M.A.; Kozanecki, A. Short-Period CdO/MgOSuperlattices as Cubic CdMgO Quasi-Alloys. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 5466–5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bashir, K.; Ali, A.; Ashraf, M.; Mehboob, N.; Zaman, A. Optical and structural properties of vacuum annealed multilayer nanostructured CdZnS thin films deposited by thermal evaporation. Opt. Mater. 2021, 119, 111353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Swanepoel, R. Determination of surface roughness and optical constants of inhomogeneous amorphous silicon films. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 1984, 17, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tauc, J. Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1974; p. 159. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ashraf, M.; Akhtar, S.M.J.; Mehmood, M.; Qayyum, A. Optical and structural properties of ZnSxSe1−x thin films deposited by thermal evaporation. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 48, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Image of thin films: (a) CdO before annealing; (b) CdO after annealing; (c) Cd0.75Mg0.25O before annealing; (d) Cd0.75Mg0.25O after annealing.
Figure 1. Image of thin films: (a) CdO before annealing; (b) CdO after annealing; (c) Cd0.75Mg0.25O before annealing; (d) Cd0.75Mg0.25O after annealing.
Materials 14 04538 g001
Figure 2. XRD profile of CdO, MgO and CdMgO.
Figure 2. XRD profile of CdO, MgO and CdMgO.
Materials 14 04538 g002
Figure 3. SEM images: (a) CdO; (b) Cd0.75Mg0.25O; (c) Cd0.5Mg0.5O; (d) Cd0.25Mg0.75O; (e) MgO annealed thin films.
Figure 3. SEM images: (a) CdO; (b) Cd0.75Mg0.25O; (c) Cd0.5Mg0.5O; (d) Cd0.25Mg0.75O; (e) MgO annealed thin films.
Materials 14 04538 g003
Figure 4. EDX spectra of (a) CdO; (b)Cd0.75Mg0.25O; (c) Cd0.5Mg0.5O; (d) Cd0.25Mg0.75O.
Figure 4. EDX spectra of (a) CdO; (b)Cd0.75Mg0.25O; (c) Cd0.5Mg0.5O; (d) Cd0.25Mg0.75O.
Materials 14 04538 g004
Figure 5. Transmittance of Cd0.5Mg0.5O thin film along with fitted curve.
Figure 5. Transmittance of Cd0.5Mg0.5O thin film along with fitted curve.
Materials 14 04538 g005
Figure 6. Transmittance spectra of CdO; Cd0.75Mg0.25O; Cd0.5Mg0.5O; Cd0.25Mg0.75O; and MgO annealed thin films.
Figure 6. Transmittance spectra of CdO; Cd0.75Mg0.25O; Cd0.5Mg0.5O; Cd0.25Mg0.75O; and MgO annealed thin films.
Materials 14 04538 g006
Figure 7. Energy band gap of (a) CdO (b) Cd0.75Mg0.25O (c) Cd0.5Mg0.5O (d) Cd0.25Mg0.75O (e) MgO annealed thin films.
Figure 7. Energy band gap of (a) CdO (b) Cd0.75Mg0.25O (c) Cd0.5Mg0.5O (d) Cd0.25Mg0.75O (e) MgO annealed thin films.
Materials 14 04538 g007aMaterials 14 04538 g007b
Figure 8. Variation of energy band gap with the increase in Mg content.
Figure 8. Variation of energy band gap with the increase in Mg content.
Materials 14 04538 g008
Figure 9. Electrical resistivity of CdMgO thin films with increasing Mg content.
Figure 9. Electrical resistivity of CdMgO thin films with increasing Mg content.
Materials 14 04538 g009
Table 1. Lattice parameters and crystallite size of CdO and MgO.
Table 1. Lattice parameters and crystallite size of CdO and MgO.
Coating IDThetaLattice Parameter d (Ǻ)a (Ǻ)Crystallite Size D (nm)
CdO16.92.64984.589633.28
MgO18.52.42774.204814.42
Table 2. Elemental composition of vacuum-annealed CdO, Cd1−xMgxO, and MgO films (EDAX).
Table 2. Elemental composition of vacuum-annealed CdO, Cd1−xMgxO, and MgO films (EDAX).
ElementAtom %
(CdO)
Atom %
(Cd0.75Mg0.25O)
Atom %
(Cd0.5Mg0.5O)
Atom %
(Cd0.25Mg0.75O)
Atom %
(MgO)
Cadmium52.6039.7026.9113.31-
Magnesium-12.1025.2137.1853.80
Oxygen47.4048.2047.8849.5146.20
Total100100100100100
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bashir, K.; Mehboob, N.; Ashraf, M.; Zaman, A.; Sultana, F.; Khan, A.F.; Ali, A.; Mushtaq, M.; Uddin, S.; Althubeiti, K. Growth and Investigation of Annealing Effects on Ternary Cd1−xMgxO Nanocomposit Thin Films. Materials 2021, 14, 4538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164538

AMA Style

Bashir K, Mehboob N, Ashraf M, Zaman A, Sultana F, Khan AF, Ali A, Mushtaq M, Uddin S, Althubeiti K. Growth and Investigation of Annealing Effects on Ternary Cd1−xMgxO Nanocomposit Thin Films. Materials. 2021; 14(16):4538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bashir, Khalid, Nasir Mehboob, Muhammad Ashraf, Abid Zaman, Fozia Sultana, Abdul Faheem Khan, Asad Ali, Muhammad Mushtaq, Sarir Uddin, and Khaled Althubeiti. 2021. "Growth and Investigation of Annealing Effects on Ternary Cd1−xMgxO Nanocomposit Thin Films" Materials 14, no. 16: 4538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop