Next Article in Journal
Fundamental Properties and Thermal Transferability of Masonry Built by Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Self-Insulation Blocks
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Algorithm for the Determination of Walker Damage in Loaded Disc Springs
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Carbon Nanotubes-Based Nanomaterials and Their Agricultural and Biotechnological Applications

Department of Biosystems Engineering, The Institute of Forest Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Equivalent authors.
Materials 2020, 13(7), 1679;
Submission received: 21 February 2020 / Revised: 26 March 2020 / Accepted: 31 March 2020 / Published: 3 April 2020


Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are considered a promising nanomaterial for diverse applications owing to their attractive physicochemical properties such as high surface area, superior mechanical and thermal strength, electrochemical activity, and so on. Different techniques like arc discharge, laser vaporization, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and vapor phase growth are explored for the synthesis of CNTs. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages. The physicochemical properties of the synthesized CNTs are profoundly affected by the techniques used in the synthesis process. Here, we briefly described the standard methods applied in the synthesis of CNTs and their use in the agricultural and biotechnological fields. Notably, better seed germination or plant growth was noted in the presence of CNTs than the control. However, the exact mechanism of action is still unclear. Significant improvements in the electrochemical performances have been observed in CNTs-doped electrodes than those of pure. CNTs or their derivatives are also utilized in wastewater treatment. The high surface area and the presence of different functional groups in the functionalized CNTs facilitate the better adsorption of toxic metal ions or other chemical moieties. CNTs or their derivatives can be applied for the storage of hydrogen as an energy source. It has been observed that the temperature widely influences the hydrogen storage ability of CNTs. This review paper highlighted some recent development on electrochemical platforms over single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs), multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs), and nanocomposites as a promising biomaterial in the field of agriculture and biotechnology. It is possible to tune the properties of carbon-based nanomaterials by functionalization of their structure to use as an engineering toolkit for different applications, including agricultural and biotechnological fields.

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology has an essential place in the progress of the latest technology, and is the leading investment field in all research fields. Nanotechnology provides an approach for inducing cell growth and forming a high-dimensional structure, like tissue engineering [1]. Among this nanotechnology, the prime spotlights are carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for industrial applications and implementations. CNTs are categorized into single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) according to the number of layers present in the structure (Figure 1). SWCNTs consist of single-layer of graphene with the diameter range of 0.4–2 nm, whereas MWCNTs comprise a multilayer of graphene sheet with the outer and inner diameter of 2–100 nm and 1–3 nm, respectively, being 0.2 to several microns in length [2]. The physicochemical characteristics comparison of SWCNTs and MWCNTs is shown in Table 1. CNTs have been recognized as an attractive material that can be utilized in a variety of fields depending on mechanical [3], electrical [4], and thermal characteristics [5]. CNTs are well suited for biological applications, where a high aspect ratio is required [6]. Initially, CNTs’ works were primarily focused on electronic devices [7], displays [8], transistors [9,10], and so on, using the electrical characteristics of this nanomaterial. However, CNTs are considered a suitable material for several applications, ranging from biomedical [11] to agricultural technology [12,13,14]. The possible applications of CNTs are shown in Figure 2. Nanoparticles under 100 nm exhibit fascinating physical properties that open up new opportunities for application in various areas, including biological technology [15]. The development of new biocatalysts and drugs carrier from nanoparticles for bioengineering applications has advantages for grasping actions in the body, owing to their unique optical or electrical characteristics.
Various reports are available that emphasize the significance of CNTs to support bone growth by enhancing the mechanical properties of existing natural and synthetic polymers [16,17]. Currently, most of the studies on biological applications of CNTs-based and other carbon allotropes (graphene, fullerene) as biomaterials are focused on an approach to continuous interactions with living cells and tissues [17]. However, it has also been reported that cell/tissue interactions with CNTs can have adverse effects, which can cause a potential risk to human health [17]. Herein, we briefly described the synthesis and applications of carbon-derived nanomaterials in agricultural and biotechnological fields. The properties of CNTs are profoundly affected by their synthesis process. CNTs or their derivatives exhibited superior potential to promote the plant and growth. These nanomaterials can widely be explored in the fields of a nanosensor for the detection of the pathogens, as well as other bioresource fields, including battery, fuel cell, energy, and water purification.

2. Synthesis of CNTs

Various methods are available that are employed for the fabrication of CNTs from different carbon precursors. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages. Here, we briefly described some conventional methods utilized in the synthesis of CNTs with their merits and demerits.

2.1. Arc Discharge

This method is based on the potential difference between the two electrodes within a chamber. The graphite rod acts as an anode, and the migration of carbon particles migrated towards the cathode electrode, which is kept at a low temperature for the condensation of CNTs. The transition metals, such as Co, Ni, Fe, and Y, favor the formation of SWCNTs. The arc current sublimates the carbon precursor filled inside the anode and produces plasma at very high temperatures (~4000–6000 K) [18]. However, other by-products are also generated during the synthesis of CNTs through the arc discharge method. Therefore, it is essential to control the purification step for the synthesis of CNTs [19]. The high-quality CNTs can be produced through this approach by using the suitable catalyst and optimizing the process conditions [20,21]. The pressure of the gas and the applied current in the chamber are also important variables. As the pressure increases, the production of CNTs increases. However, a decrease in the yield of CNTs is observed at a very high pressure.

2.2. Laser Vaporization

In this method, the shooting of the targeted graphite is performed at about 1200 °C in a reaction furnace. As a consequence of this shooting, the vaporization of graphite has occurred, which is collected at a cold collector. Helium or argon gas is used for the carrier of the vaporized graphite, and the pressure of the reaction furnace is maintained at about 500 Torr [22]. Uniform SWCNTs can be produced in the presence of the transition metal catalysts such as Co, Ni, and Fe. The laser evaporation method is the optimal state for the high yield and precise control of process parameters [23,24]. The diameter of SWCNTs produced by the laser evaporation approach is profoundly affected by the furnace temperature and is generated in a narrow range with a diameter distribution of ~1.2–1.4 nm [25]. The diameter distribution of the produced materials can be easily tuned by changing the chemical compositions of the target, as well as the process gas [24].

2.3. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)

A supportive catalyst is required for the synthesis of CNTs through the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method from their carbon precursor. The decomposition of the injected gas accomplishes the synthesis of CNTs via heat and plasma [26,27]. The thermal CVD synthesis method is well-suited for the synthesis of highly pure materials, and the microstructures of the synthesized materials can be controlled in this method [28]. The temperature plays an essential role in the growth rate, diameter, and density of the developed CNTs [29]. An enhancement (~4 times) in the CNTs growth rate (0.5–2.0 μm/min) was noted by increasing the temperature from 750 °C to 950 °C. It has been noted that Ni has better catalytic activity than Co and Fe [30]. The thickness of the catalyst also has a significant influence on the density, diameter, and length of the developed CNTs [31]. It was noted that the thicker catalyst layer facilitates the formation of the larger diameter of CNTs with a shorter length. Further, the temperature gradients and catalyst–substrate interactions between catalyst particles are crucial for determining the CNTs’ growth mechanism [32]. The plasma CVD method has an advantage over the thermal CVD method [33], where a relatively lower temperature is required for the synthesis of CNTs [34].

2.4. Vapor Phase Growth

In the vapor phase growth process, the synthesis of CNTs takes place in the presence of the reaction gases and an organometallic catalyst in a reaction furnace without the assistance of any substrate. The graphite surface having CNTs is widely affected by the crystal face of the catalyst particle, whereas the diameter of the nanotubes is profoundly influenced by the size of the decomposed catalyst particles. This method has an advantage for the synthesis of CNTs [35].
The comparative study of these methods, including arc discharge, laser vaporization, chemical vapor deposition, and vapor phase growth, with their merits and demerits, are summarized in Table 2.

3. Properties

3.1. Electrical Properties

Several studies have determined the electrical properties of CNTs based on the concept of a helical structure, as proposed by Iijima [18]. The semiconductor or metallic potentials of CNTs are governed by the diameter and helicity of the graphene. As shown in Figure 3, CNTs can be made by the rolling of a graphene sheet such that the equivalent lattice parts of the two hexagons coincide [38,39]. The roll-up vector Ch = na1 + ma2 = (n, m) can control the diameter and helicity of the SWCNTs, where n and m are integers, and a1 and a2 are graphene lattice vectors [40]. The two integers (n and 0) correspond to the number of unit vectors along the direction of the grid [41]. The two (n, 0) exponents can be used to predict the electronic structure of SWCNTs. As shown in Figure 3, the chiral angle in the zigzag direction of the unit vector (a1, a2) of the hexagonal honeycomb grating is θ = 0° and the armchair tube corresponds to θ = 30° [42]. When (n, n), the nanotube is called “armchair,” and when (n, 0), the nanotube is called “zigzag” (armchair: conductor properties; zigzag: semiconductor properties). There are several reports available that show the high conductivity of CNTs [43,44,45]. It has been noted that the resistance of metal SWCNTs in rope form was about 10−4 Ω cm at 300 K. This value is a higher value than the current known conductive carbon fiber [46,47].

3.2. Thermal Properties

CNTs have better thermal conductivity than the diamond (sp3 hybridized) owing to the presence of sp2 hybridized covalent bonds [48,49]. The thermal conductivity of CNTs is widely influenced by the temperature and phonon mean-free path. The thermal conductivity value of SWCNTs is noted in the range of 1800–6000 W/m·K at room temperature. This value is higher than the diamond, 3320 W/m·K, which was known for the highest thermal conductive material. However, the thermal conductivity of MWCNTs is noted to be 3000 W/m·K [50,51]. The thermal properties of CNTs are also influenced by the functionalization [52]. The thermal conductivity of the polymer can be easily modified by incorporating CNTs in their matrix, and this potential is widely affected by the nature of CNTs [36,37,53].

3.3. Mechanical Properties

The strong covalent bond (sp2) enables the high mechanical strength of CNTs. It undergoes the bending condition without damaging its original structure after applying the strong force and returns the original condition as the force is removed from the surface. The average Young’s modulus values of CNTs with the diameter ranging from 1.0 to 1.5 nm were found to ~1.25 TPa, which is higher the in-plane modulus value of graphite [54,55]. The elastic properties of SWCNTs are overwhelmingly affected by the chirality and the diameter of CNTs [56,57]. The mechanical strength of CNTs varies with the size of the nanoparticles, and has a considerable impact on the mechanical strength of the composites [58,59]. Owing to the excellent characteristic, CNTs can be used not only as a reinforcing material, but also as an additive material.

4. Application of CNTs

4.1. Agriculture Applications

The unique properties of nanomaterials such as small size, large surface area, and reactivity provide excellent opportunities for its use in the agricultural sector. The foremost applications of CNTs in the agricultural field include seed germination, early plant growth, pesticides, and biosensor diagnostics and analysis. The potential toxicity of nanomaterials has not yet been widely investigated [60,61,62]. Here, we described the potential utilization of CNTs in the agricultural sector by considering some selected, but significant works.

4.1.1. CNTs in Plant Growth

The applications of the nanomaterials as a promoter for plant and crop growth have received a significant amount of interest from the scientific community. It has been noted that CNTs can penetrate the thick seed coat and activate the water uptake process, which might be responsible for rapid seed germination and early growth [63]. Mondal and coworkers measured the seeds germination rate of Brassica juncea (mustard) in the presence of MWCNTs having a diameter of ~30 nm. A significant enhancement in the seeds germination rate, T50 (time for 50% germination), was noted in the presence of a low concentration of oxidized MWCNTs compared with the control. They observed that the moisture content was significantly high in oxidized MWCNTs-treated seeds than in the untreated condition, indicating that oxidized MWCNTs facilitated the water-absorbing potential of the seeds for rapid regeneration. The high water content in oxidized MWCNTs-treated seeds was the result of the easy penetration ability of these functionalized CNTs. However, the exact mechanism for the rapid growth of seeds in oxidized MWCNTs is still unclear. It is well known that aquaporins facilitate the water uptake inside the cells. The efficiency of aquaporin is profoundly affected by several factors like pH; concentrations of the heavy metal ions; osmotic pressure; and water channel expression genes such as plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP), small basic intrinsic protein (SIP), and so on. Aquaporin also reduces the flow of different ions through membranes and controls the electrochemical potential of the membrane. This potential of aquaporins is expected to be the key reason for the rapid regeneration of seeds in the presence of oxidized MWCNTs [64]. Several studies have been done to explore the effects of the various carbon nanomaterials (CNMs), including MWCNTs, fullerenes, and carbon nanohorns on different plants such as tomato, rice, cucumber, onion, radish, corn, soybean, switchgrass, and broccoli [65,66,67,68,69,70,71]. It was noted that 50–100 mg/L concentrations of CNMs are sufficient to penetrate the seeds for fast germination and growth rates [65,66]. Various factors such as size, shape, surface structure, solubility, and concentrations, as well as the presence of the functional groups, have significant contributions towards the toxicity and pathology caused by CNTs in the germination of seeds [61,72]. Functionalized carbon nanotubes (F-CNTs) also have an important aspect of being used as a nanomaterial to alter the seed germination and growth rates. Chang and coworkers have evaluated the toxic effects of CNTs (SWCNTs and MWCNTs) combined with cadmium (Cd) on wheat seedling growth. A significant reduction in total root length, root surface area, average root diameter, numbers of root hairs, and the dry weight of shoots and roots was observed in Cd-combined CNTs treatment groups than with Cd, as well as SWCNTs and MWCNTs treatment, indicating that Cd-combined CNTs remarkably inhibited wheat growth and development. Furthermore, a decrease in tubulins in the root was also noted. However, an enhancement in glutathione S-transferase and cytochrome P450 in the shoots and roots was observed in Cd-combined CNTs treatment groups, suggesting the improved defense ability of wheat seedling. It was interesting to see that the accumulation of Cd in shoot and root tissues was profoundly affected by the concentrations of CNTs. These results suggested that CNTs facilitated the toxicity of Cd to the wheat seedling. Therefore, the toxicity of CNTs should be remarkably considered with food security in the future with exposure of crops to Cd [73]. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) morphologies of wheat plant cells under different conditions are shown in Figure 4a. The results indicated that CNTs had the potential to destroy the cell structure, and Cd highly influenced this ability. A comparative study has been done by Cano and coworkers to evaluate the effects of CNTs at various concentrations (0, 10, and 100 mg/kg) for the germination and growth of corn seeds. For this, they have taken pure SWCNTs, OH-functionalized, and surfactant stabilized SWCNTs [74]. The microwave-induced heating approach was explored to determine CNTs in different parts of the germinated seeds. They noted that the accumulation of F-CNTs in roots, stems, and leaves was independent of the functional groups present in CNTs, but dependent on the volume and composition of the soil. No significant difference in the plant physiological stress was observed between SWCNTs and the control. The effects of CNMs on plant and crop growth are also summarized in Table 3. Bioenergy crops are a suitable candidate for use in energy production. For bioenergy applications, plants should produce a high amount of biomass and resist adverse environmental conditions. The effects of CNMs on seed germination, biomass accumulation, and salt stress response of bioenergy crops (sorghum and switchgrass) were studied by Pandey et al. [75]. A significant enhancement in the germination rate was observed in CNTs-treated crops compared with the control, indicating the positive effect of nanomaterial towards crop growth. Approximately 73.68% and 31.57% enhancement in shoot biomass was noted in switchgrass seedlings with the exposure of CNTs for 10 days at concentrations of 50 and 200 μg/mL, respectively. A significant reduction in salt (NaCl)-induced stress symptoms was noted in CNMs-treated media compared with the control, demonstrating that CNMs have the potential to protect the plants against salt-induced stress in the saline growth medium. The effects of CNTs on the growth rate of switchgrass and sorghum seedlings at different concentrations after 10 days of exposure are given in Figure 4b,c.

4.1.2. Biosensor

The biosensor is a device that quantitatively measures the molecules reacting in a solution having analytes to be measured by utilizing their reacting properties with a specific substance. The excellent physicochemical potentials make CNMs an ideal material for sensing applications to detect the pathogens [76,77]. In comparison with the commercially available sensors such as metal oxides, silicon, and so on, CNTs-based biosensors have significant advantages, such as high sensitivity (large surface area ratio), excellent luminescence properties, fast response time, and high stability [78]. Different types of sensors are explored for monitoring the pollutant/species present in the medium. Biosensors are utilized to detect compounds such as aromatic and organic compounds and halogenated pesticides. Solid-state electrochemical sensors are suitable for the chemical gas sensor from their sensitivity, reproducibility, and power consumption. The basic principle of a biosensor for soil diagnosis is to determine the relative activity of favorable and unfavorable microbe’s presence in the soil based on differential oxygen consumption owing to respiration. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) phenomenon is also explored for the development of the biosensor from metallic nanoparticles [79]. Nano-biosensors are being rapidly explored in the agricultural sector and food processing. CNTs-based optical sensors were developed to monitor the real-time detection of pathogenic bacteria [80], organophosphate chemical warfare agents and pesticides [81], toxic materials, and proteins [82]. The one-dimensional (1D) properties of CNTs facilitate the ultrasensitive detection of analyte because all atoms are surface atoms, and minor perturbations in the chemical environment can dramatically change the electrical or optical properties [83]. This property plays a vital role in the monitoring of the optical sensor under various circumstances [84]. Among different biosensors, electrochemical biosensors are the most popular because of their excellent conductivity and electro-catalysis, high surface, and volume ratio [85]. The transfer of the electrons occurred in these biosensors [86,87,88]. CNMs have the potential to improve the response characteristics and can act as the immobilization matrices for the bio-receptors [89]. A significant decrease in the response time was observed in MWCNTs-coated electrodes used as a sensor [90]. An enhancement in the detection limits was noted in Au-MWCNTs nanocomposite, and it can detect concentrations up to 0.1 nM [91]. Enzymes are considered as a suitable substrate for the development of the biosensors. CNTs have been utilized as a support for the immobilization of enzymes in nanostructured devices. Scholl and coworkers have developed the thin film of CNTs for enhancing the enzymatic potential of penicillinase for biosensing applications. The presence of CNTs in the developed film not only altered the catalytic potential of penicillinase, but also facilitated their enzymatic activity. ConCap responses curves for penicillin G detection through the fabricated films are shown in Figure 5. Recently, Yang et al. [92] have reported a composite skin patch with a high-performance flexible sensor consisting of Ag/CNT/PDMS for monitoring of the heartbeat as well as breath during active labor (Figure 6). Owing to the presence of CNTs, the wrinkled patch is highly sensitive and conductive. This could potentially be used in prophylactic medicine for monitoring of fever or hyperthermia caused by specific pathogens. The biosensors developed with CNTs indicate regular steps of the distinct output signal for all concentration ranges compared with the control. These changes may directly influence the potential and performance of the developed sensor in terms of their sensitivity and coefficient of determination (R2) [93].

4.1.3. Pesticide Analysis

The high adsorption properties of CNTs are utilized for extraction techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE) and solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) [94]. SPE technology is one of the most widely used extraction methods for environmental, food, and biological sample pretreatment. Several studies have been done showing the potential of MWCNTs as a promising adsorbent for the pre-concentration of cobalt, nickel, and lead ions [95,96]; organophosphate (OP) pesticides [97]; and chloro-phenols [98]. The recoveries of the analyte were also altered by the amount of MWCNTs and the treatment conditions, indicating that, by varying the sample conditions, they could be extended to other analytes and other types of food samples [99]. SPE sorbent, based on nanoparticles, demonstrates the potential for adequate enrichment and sensitive analysis of metal ions in a variety of media [100,101]. The effects of the CNMs in the SPE technique are also given in Table 4. An enhancement in the extraction efficiency was noted in SWCNTs- or MWCNTs-coated SPME fiber. The development of fiber coating technology for high-efficiency extraction of the analyte is considered an exciting research direction in SPME [102]. Higher extraction efficiency, precision, and accuracy were observed in SWCNTs-coated fiber from the targeted samples [100]. It has been noted that CNTs-coated fibers have more extraction efficiency than the commercially available PDMS [103,104]. Saraji et al. synthesized CNTs/SiO2 nanohybrids for SPME coating and evaluated their extraction efficiency for some organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in vegetables, fruits, and water samples [105]. Gas chromatography-corona discharge ion mobility spectrometry was applied for the detections of the OPPs. Significant enhancement in the adsorption capacity and mass transfer rate was observed in CNTs/SiO2-coated SPME compared with the commercial SPME fibers (PA, PDMS, and PDMS-DVB), indicating their improved extraction efficiency. For water samples, the detection limits range was 0.005–0.020 μg/L, and the quantification limits were 0.010 and 0.050 μg/L, with excellent linearity in the range of 0.01–3.0 μg/L for the samples. The spiking recoveries range was from 79 (±9) to 99 (±8). Therefore, the developed materials have the potential and can be applied for the analysis of OPPs in real samples [106]. The influence of the CNMs in the SPME technique is also summarized in Table 5. Feria and colleagues have determined the presence of different types of pesticides in virgin olive oils using MWCNTs and carboxylated c-SWCNTs. It was interesting to note that the c-SWCNTs exhibited better sorbent capabilities than those of MWCNTs owing to the presence of carboxyl functional groups in their structure, which facilitates better interactions between pesticides and CNTs. A comparison of the performance of c-SWCNTs and MWCNTs for the detection of different pesticides from virgin oil samples is shown in Figure 7a. The bar diagram demonstrates the better sorbent potential of c-SWCNTs than MWCNTs for different kinds of pesticides from the selected samples owing to the presence of the different functional groups. The effect of the number of c-SWCNTs (10 and 50 mg) on the analytical signal for different pesticides is shown in Figure 7b. An enhancement in the peak area was observed by increasing the number of c-SWCNTs for all analytes up to 30 mg. Furthermore, a decrease in the peak value was noted after a 30 mg dose of c-SWCNTs owing to non-quantitative elution of the retained analytes [107].

4.2. Energy and Environmental Applications

Works on CNTs in the field of bioresources are being studied as a material capable of overcoming the limitations of existing carbon materials or improving performance by using the high electrical conductivity of CNTs. As CNTs showed a high specific surface area, much research has been conducted into CNTs as an adsorbent for the removal of different contaminants such as Zn2+ and Pb2+ [108]. CNTs nanocomposites have a wide range of applications depending on the type and combination of the target materials. Here, we have briefly described the nanotechnological applications of CNMs-based materials, including the battery, wastewater treatment, fuel cell, and energy storage, by considering some attractive works.

4.2.1. Battery

Despite the rapid development of lithium-ion batteries, which have high power and energy density properties [109], numerous reports have focused on the application of CNTs for the energy sector [110,111,112]. The energy efficiency of CNTs is intensely affected by the synthesis method, shape, and structure. Maurin et al. showed that lithium was intercalated between the graphene layers of the MWCNTs prepared by arc discharge using micro-raman spectroscopy [113]. CNTs produced by the arc discharge method had a reversible capacity of 125 mA·hg−1 at a low current density [114], which has limited the practical application in lithium-ion batteries to some extent [115]. However, CNTs synthesized by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) showed the high reversible capacity of 340–640 mA·hg−1 at a low current density [116,117,118]. A comparative study was performed by Yang et al. using short CNTs (S-CNTs) and long CNTs (L-CNTs) synthesized through co-pyrolysis, as well as the CVD method, respectively, to evaluate the reversible capacity of both samples at a low current density. The reversible capacity of S-CNTs anode material was 266 and 170 mA·hg−1 at the current density of 0.2 and 0.8 mA·cm−2, respectively, which were twice that of L-CNTs anode materials. The surface film and charge-transfer resistant of S-CNTs anode materials were 1.7 Ω and 3–4 Ω, respectively, which is much lower than the L-CNTs (14 Ω, and 31.2–61.2 Ω) anode materials, indicating higher electrochemical activity [119]. The holes in the graphene sheet allow lithium to diffuse better inside the CNTs and increase the capacity. The conductive SWCNTs were able to store about five times more lithium ions than semiconducting SWCNTs [120]. The high conductivity of CNTs also provides enhanced electron transfer with nanostructured anode material [121]. However, long-term stability has remained a challenging task. The electrochemical performance is highly dependent on the nanostructure, shape, and surface properties [122,123,124,125,126]. Lee et al. have developed CNT–Si composite anode with extremely stable long-term cycling and a discharge capacity of 2364 mA·hg−1 at a tap density of 1.103 g cm−3. The CNT–Si composite anode retained an excellent cyclic maintenance equivalent to 90% of the initial discharge capacity after 100 cycles. A two-sloped full concentration gradient (TSFCG), Li[Ni0.85Co0.05Mn0.10] O2 cathode, was used to prepare the fuel cell configuration. The assembled fuel cell exhibited an energy density of 350 W h kg−1 with excellent capacity retention for 500 cycles at 1C [127]. The electrochemical performances of CNTs-based Li-ion batteries are given in Table 6.

4.2.2. Wastewater Treatment

Nanotechnology plays a vital role in water purification. CNTs can be used for the purification of wastewater [128]. Adsorption and degradation/detoxification is the key strategy for the removal of contaminant from the samples through CNTs. The functionalization of the material can improve the efficiency of CNTs for contaminants. It is possible to target a specific contaminant through the well-modified CNTs. A schematic representation of CNTs’ modifications for the removal of contaminant from water and wastewater is shown in Figure 8. Design or modification of CNTs’ properties may also assist in the separation of materials following the contaminant treatment process. Nanoparticle separation is facilitated by incorporating a magnetic component into CNTs [129]. It is easy to control the potential and current in the electrochemical technique for wastewater treatment [130,131]. Yang et al. have used a seepage carbon nanotube electrode (SCNE) reactor to improve the electrochemical wastewater treatment efficiency. The innovative concept behind the reactor design was that the overall mass transfer would be significantly improved via contaminant migration through the porous carbon nanotube electrode. The current efficiency of the SCNE reactor was 340–519% higher than those of the conventional reactor, and the energy utilization to mineralize the equal weight of organic content was only 16.5–22.3% of the conventional reactor. The developed reactor has the potential for application in wastewater treatment [132]. The electrocoagulation is also useful for removing effluents from the polluted water [133]. These applications utilize the advantages of CNTs’ properties such as high reactivity, strong adsorption, and high specific surface area [133,134,135]. Zhang et al. have fabricated Ti/SnO2-Sb-CNTs electrodes for anodic oxidation of dye-containing wastewater through the pulse electrodeposition method. The CNTs-modified electrode exhibited a larger surface area compared with that without CNTs, which provides a more active area for electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants. The CNTs-modified electrode was 4.8 times more durable compared with that without CNTs. The modified electrode has a higher kinetic rate constant, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total organic carbon (TOC) removals, and current mineralization efficiency, which are 1.93, 1.27, 1.26, and 1.38 times higher, respectively, than those of the unmodified electrode. The CNTs-based electrode exhibited 1.15 times more permeation flux compared with the electrode without CNTs [136]. The electrochemically activated CNTs filters were developed for wastewater treatment [137]. Thus, the solutions for implementing water reuse, seawater desalination, and water purification more efficiently and cost-effectively are expected to emerge from the use of nanotechnology with CNTs. The applications of CNMs in wastewater treatment are also summarized in Table 7. It was noted that phenolic compounds are often explored in the commercial manufacturing of several products such as resins, polymeric materials, ion exchange resin, dyes, drugs, and explosives, among others. Owing to the extensive uses of phenolic products, a large amount of phenol is discharged from industries in the water, which causes toxicity and can damage the cellular proteins. Therefore, the removal of phenolic compounds from the contaminated water on a large scale is necessary for a healthy life. For this, CNTs with rich pore structure, analytic abilities, high surface area, and sharp curvatures show great potential for the removal of the phenolic compounds from the contaminated water through π–π, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen bonding interactions [138]. Ma et al. have prepared CNTs/Fe@C hybrids material for the removal of the binary dye from the contaminated water through the one-pot method with a high specific surface area (186.3 m2/g). A significant difference between single and binary dye systems was noted through the adsorption technique. The primary adsorption potentials of the prepared hybrids for the methylene blue (MB), methyl orange (MO), and neutral red (NR) were 132.58, 16.53, and 98.81 mg/g, respectively, and the adsorption equilibrium times were 80, 40, and 10 min, respectively. The adsorption capacity and their changes in single and binary dye systems are given in Figure 9a. Cooperative adsorption was noted in the MB–MO dye system through the developed hybrids material. An enhancement in the adsorption capacity was observed in the MB–MO dye system by 30% and 35%, with a decrease in the equilibrium time by 25% and 50%. Meanwhile, the MB–NR dye system exhibited a competitive adsorption tendency. The adsorption isotherm of MO and MB from the prepared hybrids material is shown in Figure 9b. These results suggested that the prepared hybrids had the efficiency to be used as a promising adsorbent for the large-scale applications in binary dye systems, which exhibited a cooperative and competitive adsorption tendency to address the dye pollution effectively [139]. Lee and coworkers fabricated MWCNTs-based polyaniline (PANi)/polyether sulfone (PES) membranes by in situ polymerization of aniline in the presence of MWCNTs for the effective removal of natural organic matter (NOM) in water. The fabricated membranes exhibited 30 times greater efficiency than the PES membrane. This enhancement was attributed to the synergistic effects of the MWCNTs/PANi complex. The electrostatic interactions between the membrane surface and NOM facilitate the adsorption capacity of the developed membrane. The fabricated membrane exhibited 100% water flux recovery and 65% total fouling ratio after treatment with 0.1 M HCl/0.1 M NaOH solution for 1 h [140]. The extending exploration of SWCNTs raises environmental concerns. Qu et al. have evaluated the microbial communities’ (Zoogloea, Rudaea, Mobilicocus, Burkholderia, Singulisphaera, Labrys, and Mucilaginibacter) responses of SWCNTs in phenol containing wastewater media. The enhancement in the phenol removal rates was observed in the SWCNTs-treated batch in 20 days initially. However, as the phenol concentrations increased to 1000 mg/L after 60 days, a decrease in the phenol removal rate was noted even at the higher concentration of SWCNTs (3.5 g/L). It was noted that SWCNTs protected the microbes from inactivation by generating more bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs), which form a protective layer for the microbes. A significant decrease in the bacterial community structure was observed after the addition of SWCNTs. This phenomenon is associated with the change in sludge settling, aromatic degradation, and EPS generation. These results demonstrated that SWCNTs exhibited the protective response for sludge microbes in phenol containing wastewater media and enabled the important information related to the potential effects of SWCNTs on wastewater treatment processes [141].

4.2.3. Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs)

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) technology produces hydrogen or electrons by a bacterial oxidizing process from substances such as wastewater. This is the basic concept of generating electricity through an anode–cathode system. For this, the cathode should have excellent compatibility with microorganisms and possess a large specific surface area per unit volume, as well as excellent durability as chemically safety materials [142]. CNTs have received much attention for cathodic applications owing to their superior and tunable physiochemical potential. The electronic signal is also affected by the temperature of the medium [143]. The high limiting current density and electrochemical performance were observed in the deformed CNTs owing to the higher specific surface area generated by deformation [144]. The modification is required in CNMs to achieve the proper catalytic surface area for better electrochemical performance [145,146,147]. The change in the aspect ratio and surface area of CNTs was performed using a metal catalyst such as platinum (Pt) [148,149,150]. The CNTs/Pt composites exhibited better powder density (~8.7% higher) than the pure Pt catalyst when the chemical oxygen content of the substrate reached 100 mg/L. The significant enhancement in the electrical properties was observed in nitrogen-doped CNTs [151]. The nitrogen-doped CNTs exhibited a maximum power density of 1600 ± 50 mW·m−2, which is significantly higher than the commonly used Pt catalyst for cathode application. For a better reaction process, the surface area and durability of the anodic materials should be high [152,153]. The CNTs/polyaniline (PANi) composites showed an enhanced electrochemical activity at a higher content of CNTs in the medium [154]. The CNTs-coated anode demonstrated ~62% higher voltage output than the untreated anode [155]. The performance of the anodic materials can also be improved by using the three-dimensional (3D) structure of graphene oxide (GO)/CNTs and melamine sponge composites [156]. The 3D graphene oxide (GO)/CNTs and melamine sponge display the highest electrochemical performance at a thickness of 1.5 mm. The porous structure facilitates the biocompatibility of the composites. These results provide valuable insights into the active anode–cathode development for MFC applications. The effects of the carbon-based electrode on MFCs are also given in Table 8.

4.2.4. High-Efficiency Electrical Devices

For energy applications, it is crucial to increase the energy density of the material without compromising other electrochemical properties [157]. CNTs are not only light in weight, but also have a sufficient area for hydrogen storing in their tubular structure, which can increase the charge storage capacity per unit mass [158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166]. CNTs can also be utilized in other electrochemical applications [167,168] and supercapacitor preparation [169,170,171,172]. An increased surface area of CNMs is required for energy applications with pore sizes of 0.7 to 0.9 nm, which are suitable for the ions approach. It has been proved that hydrogen is stored in the pores formed in the space between the tubes, and the adsorbed hydrogen molecules are subjected to a stable surface suction force. Approximately 3.3 wt.% and 0.7 wt.% hydrogen adsorption was noted within the tube (10, 10) and interstitial space of CNTs, respectively [160]. A hierarchical structure is required to obtain the high output characteristics, which are connected in a vast pore region for the fast ion diffusion even at a high current density. The maximum power density can also be improved by using the cetrimonium bromide (CTAB) with CNTs [173]. A porous three-dimensional structure was formed by intercalating the CNTs into graphite in a vertical direction to improve the maximum energy density. A significant enhancement in the maximum energy density was observed in this structure, which was 117.2 Wh/L at a maximum power density of 424 kW/L per volume, and a maximum energy density of 110.6 Wh/kg at a maximum power density of 400 kW/kg per weight. This kind of structure is light in weight, which provides additional advantages to make small portable electronic products such as automobile batteries, rechargeable batteries, and notebook computers. The hydrogen storage capacity of different types of CNTs is given in Table 9. The hydrogen storage ability of CNTs is shown in Figure 10. The interaction energy plays a vital role in the storage of hydrogen. The results indicated that CNTs could effectively store hydrogen under cryogenic conditions, which is not suitable for mobile applications. This is because of the reduced interaction energy (1 kcal/mol) between hydrogen and the CNTs. For significant, but reversible storage under ambient conditions, the interaction energies should be around 7 kcal/mol. The interaction energy can be tuned by doping with heteroatoms or by incorporating light metal ions in CNTs [174].

5. Conclusions

CNTs have received a significant amount of interest in various applications owing to their superior physiochemical properties. Notably, the physicochemical properties of CNTs are profoundly affected by the diameter and helicity of the graphene sheet, as well as the number of graphene layers. The significant enhancement in the seeds germination/plant growth was noted in the presence of carbon-based nanomaterials compared with the control owing to the penetration of the seed coat, which allows more water uptake. However, the exact mechanism of action is still unclear. The CNTs-based sensor exhibited high sensitivity and stability, fast response time, and excellent luminescence properties. The high adsorption potential of CNTs facilitates the extraction process and is widely explored in the extraction technique for the removal of contaminants from the samples. CNTs or their derivatives are often utilized in the nanotechnology sector to develop high-efficient battery, fuel cells, electrode reactor for wastewater treatment, and energy storage. Notably, better electrochemical performances were observed in CNTs-based electrode compared with the control. CNTs can store hydrogen molecules in their structure, and this potential can be tuned by changing the electronic environment of CNTs.


This research was supported by the ‘Basic Research Program’ through the ‘National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)’ funded by the ‘Ministry of Education’ (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025582 & NRF-2019R1D1A3A03103828).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Harrison, B.S.; Atala, A. Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, H.; Pham-Huy, L.; Dramou, P.; Xiao, D.; Zuo, P.; Pham-Huy, C. Carbon Nanotubes: Applications in pharmacy and medicine. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Salvetat, J.P.; Bonard, J.M.; Thomson, N.; Kulik, A.; Forro, L.; Benoit, W.; Zuppiroli, L. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. A 1999, 69, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Odom, T.W.; Huang, J.-L.; Kim, P.; Lieber, C.M. Atomic structure and electronic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature 1998, 391, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ruoff, R.S.; Lorents, D.C. Mechanical and thermal properties of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 1995, 33, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Veetil, J.V.; Ye, K. Tailored carbon nanotubes for tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Ravindran, S.; Chaudhary, S.; Colburn, B.; Ozkan, M.; Ozkan, C.S. Covalent coupling of quantum dots to multiwalled carbon nanotubes for electronic device applications. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Q.H.; Yan, M.; Chang, R.P. Flat panel display prototype using gated carbon nanotube field emitters. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 1294–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bachtold, A.; Hadley, P.; Nakanishi, T.; Dekker, C. Logic circuits with carbon nanotube transistors. Science 2001, 294, 1317–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martel, R.; Schmidt, T.; Shea, H.; Hertel, T.; Avouris, P. Single-and multi-wall carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 2447–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kuche, K.; Maheshwari, R.; Tambe, V.; Mak, K.; Jogi, H.; Raval, N.; Pichika, M.; Kumar Tekade, R. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) based advanced dermal therapeutics: Current trends and future potential. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 8911–8937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lahiani, M.; Nima, Z.; Villagarcia, H.; Biris, A.S.; Khodakovskaya, M. Assessment of effects of the long-term exposure of agricultural crops to carbon nanotubes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 6654–6662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Y.; Chang, C.; Ji, Z.; Bouchard, D.C.; Nisbet, R.M.; Schimel, J.P.; Holden, P. Agglomeration determines effects of carbonaceous nanomaterials on soybean nodulation, dinitrogen fixation potential, and growth in Soil. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 5753–5765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ge, Y.; Shen, C.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Schimel, J.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.; Holden, P. Carbonaceous nanomaterials have higher effects on soybean Rhizosphere prokaryotic communities during therReproductive growth phase than during vegetative growth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 6636–6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wong, B.S.; Yoong, S.L.; Jagusiak, A.; Panczyk, T.; Ho, H.K.; Ang, W.H.; Pastorin, G. Carbon nanotubes for delivery of small molecule drugs. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 1964–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hopley, E.L.; Salmasi, S.; Kalaskar, D.M.; Seifalian, A.M. Carbon nanotubes leading the way forward in new generation 3D tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1000–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gholizadeh, S.; Moztarzadeh, F.; Haghighipour, N.; Ghazizadeh, L.; Baghbani, F.; Shokrgozar, M.A.; Allahyari, Z. Preparation and characterization of novel functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes/chitosan/β-Glycerophosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 97, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, H.H.; Kim, H.J. The preparation of carbon nanotubes by dc arc discharge using a carbon cathode coated with catalyst. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2006, 130, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cui, S.; Scharff, P.; Siegmund, C.; Schneider, D.; Risch, K.; Klötzer, S.; Spiess, S.; Romanus, H.; Schawohl, J. Investigation on preparation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes by DC arc discharge under N 2 atmosphere. Carbon 2004, 42, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lange, H.; Sioda, M.; Huczko, A.; Zhu, Y.; Kroto, H.; Walton, D. Nanocarbon production by arc discharge in water. Carbon 2003, 41, 1617–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guo, T.; Nikolaev, P.; Thess, A.; Colbert, D.; Smalley, R. Catalytic growth of single-walled manotubes by laser vaporization. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 243, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rinzler, A.; Liu, J.; Dai, H.; Nikolaev, P.; Huffman, C.; Rodriguez-Macias, F.; Boul, P.J.; Lu, A.H.; Heymann, D.; Colbert, D.T.; et al. Large-scale purification of single-wall carbon nanotubes: Process, product, and characterization. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 1998, 67, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lebedkin, S.; Schweiss, P.; Renker, B.; Malik, S.; Hennrich, F.; Neumaier, M.; Stoermer, C.; Kappes, M.M. Single-wall carbon nanotubes with diameters approaching 6 nm obtained by laser vaporization. Carbon 2002, 40, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jost, O.; Gorbunov, A.; Pompe, W.; Pichler, T.; Friedlein, R.; Knupfer, M.; Reibold, M.; Bauer, H.D.; Dunsch, L.; Golden, M.S.; et al. Diameter grouping in bulk samples of single-walled carbon nanotubes from optical absorption spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 2217–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kong, J.; Cassell, A.M.; Dai, H. Chemical vapor deposition of methane for single-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 292, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cassell, A.M.; Raymakers, J.A.; Kong, J.; Dai, H. Large scale CVD synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 6484–6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, C.J.; Park, J. Growth model of bamboo-shaped carbon nanotubes by thermal chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 3397–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, C.J.; Park, J.; Huh, Y.; Lee, J.Y. Temperature effect on the growth of carbon nanotubes using thermal chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 343, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, C.J.; Park, J.; Jeong, A.Y. Catalyst effect on carbon nanotubes synthesized by thermal chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 360, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chhowalla, M.; Teo, K.; Ducati, C.; Rupesinghe, N.; Amaratunga, G.; Ferrari, A.; Roy, D.; Robertson, J.; Milne, W.I. Growth process conditions of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes using plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 90, 5308–5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bower, C.; Zhou, O.; Zhu, W.; Werder, D.; Jin, S. Nucleation and growth of carbon nanotubes by microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 2767–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qin, L.; Zhou, D.; Krauss, A.; Gruen, D. Growing carbon nanotubes by microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 72, 3437–3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hofmann, S.; Ducati, C.; Robertson, J.; Kleinsorge, B. Low-temperature growth of carbon nanotubes by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 135–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, C.J.; Lyu, S.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Park, C.-Y.; Yang, C.-W. Large-scale production of aligned carbon nanotubes by the vapor phase growth method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 359, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, K.; Gu, M.; Guo, Y.; Pan, X.; Mu, G. Effects of carbon nanotube functionalization on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 2009, 47, 1723–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gulotty, R.; Castellino, M.; Jagdale, P.; Tagliaferro, A.; Balandin, A.A. Effects of functionalization on thermal properties of single-wall and multi-wall carbon nanotube-polymer nanocomposites. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5114–5121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Arora, N.; Sharma, N. Arc discharge synthesis of carbon nanotubes: Comprehensive review. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2014, 50, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, L.; Hart, A.; Ozden, S.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P. Spiers memorial lecture: Advances of carbon nanomaterials. Faraday Discuss 2014, 173, 9–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Odom, T.W.; Huang, J.-L.; Kim, P.; Lieber, C.M. Structure and electronic properties of carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2794–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Saifuddin, N.; Raziah, A.; Junizah, A. Carbon nanotubes: A review on structure and their interaction with proteins. J. Chem. 2013, 2013, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Charlier, J.-C.; Issi, J.-P. Electronic structure and quantum transport in carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 1998, 67, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sanvito, S.; Kwon, Y.-K.; Tománek, D.; Lambert, C.J. Fractional quantum conductance in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kim, Y.J.; Shin, T.S.; Do Choi, H.; Kwon, J.H.; Chung, Y.-C.; Yoon, H.G. Electrical conductivity of chemically modified multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon 2005, 43, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ram, R.; Rahaman, M.; Khastgir, D. Electrical properties of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)/multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) semi-transparent composites: Modelling of DC conductivity. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 69, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Thess, A.; Lee, R.; Nikolaev, P.; Dai, H. Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science 1996, 273, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kymakis, E.; Alexandou, I.; Amaratunga, G. Single-walled carbon nanotube-polymer composites: Electrical, optical and structural investigation. Synth. Met. 2002, 127, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ruoff, R.S.; Qian, D.; Liu, W.K. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes: Theoretical predictions and experimental measurements. C. R. Phys. 2003, 4, 993–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wei, L.; Kuo, P.; Thomas, R.; Anthony, T.; Banholzer, W. Thermal conductivity of isotopically modified single crystal diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 3764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hone, J.; Whitney, M.; Piskoti, C.; Zettl, A. Thermal conductivity of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, R2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, P.; Shi, L.; Majumdar, A.; McEuen, P. Thermal transport measurements of individual multiwalled nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 215502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Navarro-Pardo, F.; Martinez-Hernandez, A.L.; Velasco-Santos, C. Carbon nanotube and graphene based polyamide electrospun nanocomposites: A review. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Jackson, E.M.; Laibinis, P.E.; Collins, W.E.; Ueda, A.; Wingard, C.D.; Penn, B. Development and thermal properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 89, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Treacy, M.J.; Ebbesen, T.; Gibson, J. Exceptionally high Young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 1996, 381, 678–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Krishnan, A.; Dujardin, E.; Ebbesen, T.; Yianilos, P.; Treacy, M. Young’s modulus of single-walled nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 14013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Sánchez-Portal, D.; Artacho, E.; Soler, J.M.; Rubio, A.; Ordejón, P. Ab initio structural, elastic, and vibrational properties of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 12678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Goze, C.; Vaccarini, L.; Henrard, L.; Bernier, P.; Hemandez, E.; Rubio, A. Elastic and mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. Synth. Met. 1999, 103, 2500–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chatterjee, S.; Nafezarefi, F.; Tai, N.; Schlagenhauf, L.; Nüesch, F.; Chu, B. Size and synergy effects of nanofiller hybrids including graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes in mechanical properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 2012, 50, 5380–5386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jiang, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Hui, D.; Qiu, Y. Mechanical, electrical and thermal properties of aligned carbon nanotube/polyimide composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 56, 408–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lin, D.; Xing, B. Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: Inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 150, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zaytseva, O.; Neumann, G. Carbon nanomaterials: Production, impact on plant development, agricultural and environmental applications. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2016, 3, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Juganson, K.; Ivask, A.; Blinova, I.; Mortimer, M.; Kahru, A. NanoE-Tox: New and in-depth database concerning ecotoxicity of nanomaterials. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1788–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Khodakovskaya, M.; Dervishi, E.; Mahmood, M.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Watanabe, F.; Biris, A.S. Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 3221–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mondal, A.; Basu, R.; Das, S.; Nandy, P. Beneficial role of carbon nanotubes on mustard plant growth: An agricultural prospect. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 3, 4519–4528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ratnikova, T.A.; Podila, R.; Rao, A.M.; Taylor, A.G. Tomato seed coat permeability to selected carbon nanomaterials and enhancement of germination and seedling growth. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lahiani, M.H.; Chen, J.; Irin, F.; Puretzky, A.A.; Green, M.J.; Khodakovskaya, M.V. Interaction of carbon nanohorns with plants: Uptake and biological effects. Carbon 2015, 81, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Martínez-Ballesta, M.C.; Zapata, L.; Chalbi, N.; Carvajal, M. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes enter broccoli cells enhancing growth and water uptake of plants exposed to salinity. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 14, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Lahiani, M.H.; Dervishi, E.; Chen, J.; Nima, Z.; Gaume, A.; Biris, A.S.; Khodakovskaya, M.V. Impact of carbon nanotube exposure to seeds of valuable crops. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7965–7973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khodakovskaya, M.V.; Kim, B.S.; Kim, J.N.; Alimohammadi, M.; Dervishi, E.; Mustafa, T.; Cernigla, C.E. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: Effects on tomato growth, reproductive system, and soil microbial community. Small 2013, 9, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jiang, Y.; Hua, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Q. The effect of carbon nanotubes on rice seed germination and root growth. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Applied Biotechnology (ICAB 2012); Springer-Nature: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 1207–1212. [Google Scholar]
  71. Cañas, J.E.; Long, M.; Nations, S.; Vadan, R.; Dai, L.; Luo, M.; Ambikapathi, E.; Lee, E.H.; Olszyk, D. Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008, 27, 1922–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Deng, Y. Uptake and Accumulation of Engineered Nanomaterials by Agricultural Crops and Associated Risks in the Environment and Food Safety. Ph.D. Thesis, UMass Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA, September 2006. [Google Scholar]
  73. Chang, X.; Song, Z.; Xu, Y.; Gao, M. Effects of carbon nanotubes on growth of wheat seedlings and Cd uptake. Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124931–124941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cano, A.M.; Kohl, K.; Deleon, S.; Payton, P.; Irin, F.; Saed, M.; Shah, S.A.; Green, M.J.; Canas-Carrel, J.E. Determination of uptake, accumulation, and stress effects in corn (Zea mays L.) grown in single-wall carbon nanotube contaminated soil. Chemosphere 2016, 152, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Pandey, K.; Lahiani, M.; Hicks, V.; Hudson, M.; Green, M.; Khodakovskaya, M. Effects of carbon-based nanomaterials on seed germination, biomass accumulation and salt stress response of bioenergy crops. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Leonard, P.; Hearty, S.; Brennan, J.; Dunne, L.; Quinn, J.; Chakraborty, T.; O’Kennedy, R. Advances in biosensors for detection of pathogens in food and water. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2003, 32, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ivnitski, D.; Abdel-Hamid, I.; Atanasov, P.; Wilkins, E. Biosensors for detection of pathogenic bacteria. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1999, 14, 599–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yang, N.; Chen, X.; Ren, T.; Zhang, P.; Yang, D. Carbon nanotube based biosensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 207, 690–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Baruah, S.; Dutta, J. Nanotechnology applications in pollution sensing and degradation in agriculture: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2009, 7, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sanvicens, N.; Pastells, C.; Pascual, N.; Marco, M.-P. Nanoparticle-based biosensors for detection of pathogenic bacteria. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2009, 28, 1243–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Simonian, A.; Good, T.; Wang, S.-S.; Wild, J. Nanoparticle-based optical biosensors for the direct detection of organophosphate chemical warfare agents and pesticides. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 534, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nam, J.-M.; Thaxton, C.S.; Mirkin, C.A. Nanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteins. Science 2003, 301, 1884–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Kruss, S.; Hilmer, A.J.; Zhang, J.; Reuel, N.F.; Mu, B.; Strano, M.S. Carbon nanotubes as optical biomedical sensors. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 1933–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yoo, S.M.; Lee, S.Y. Optical biosensors for the detection of pathogenic microorganisms. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pérez-López, B.; Merkoçi, A. Nanomaterials based biosensors for food analysis applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 625–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mohanraj, V.; Chen, Y. Nanoparticles: A review. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2006, 5, 561–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Kurbanoglu, S.; Ozkan, S.A.; Merkoçi, A. Nanomaterials-based enzyme electrochemical biosensors operating through inhibition for biosensing applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 89, 886–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Wang, J. Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors. Analyst 2005, 130, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zeng, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for food safety. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 781, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, H.; Zuo, X.; Su, S.; Tang, Z.; Wu, A.; Song, S.; Zhang, D.; Fan, C. An electrochemical sensor for pesticide assays based on carbon nanotube-enhanced acetycholinesterase activity. Analyst 2008, 133, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jha, N.; Ramaprabhu, S. Development of Au nanoparticles dispersed carbon nanotube-based biosensor for the detection of paraoxon. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 806–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yang, Y.; Luo, C.; Jia, J.; Sun, Y.; Fu, Q.; Pan, C. A wrinkled Ag/CNTs-PDMS composite film for a high-performance flexible sensor and its applications in human-body single monitoring. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Scholl, F.; Morais, P.; Gabriel, R.; Schöning, M.; Siqueira, J.; Caseli, L. Carbon nanotubes arranged as smart interfaces in lipid Langmuir-Blodgett films enhancing the enzymatic properties of penicillinase for biosensing applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 31054–31066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Pyrzynska, K. Carbon nanotubes as sorbents in the analysis of pesticides. Chemosphere 2011, 83, 1407–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Duran, A.; Tuzen, M.; Soylak, M. Preconcentration of some trace elements via using multiwalled carbon nanotubes as solid phase extraction adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Liang, P.; Ding, Q.; Song, F. Application of multiwalled carbon nanotubes as solid phase extraction sorbent for preconcentration of trace copper in water samples. J. Sep. Sci. 2005, 28, 2339–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Du, D.; Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Cai, J.; Tu, H.; Zhang, A. Application of multiwalled carbon nanotubes for solid-phase extraction of organophosphate pesticide. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cai, Y.-Q.; Cai, Y.-E.; Mou, S.-F.; Lu, Y.-Q. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a solid-phase extraction adsorbent for the determination of chlorophenols in environmental water samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1081, 245–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Su, R.; Xu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, D.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Yu, A. Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in peanut oil by dispersive solid phase extraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2011, 879, 3423–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhu, X.; Cui, Y.; Chang, X.; Wang, H. Selective solid-phase extraction and analysis of trace-level Cr (III), Fe (III), Pb (II), and Mn (II) Ions in wastewater using diethylenetriamine-functionalized carbon nanotubes dispersed in graphene oxide colloids. Talanta 2016, 146, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Asensio-Ramos, M.; Hernández-Borges, J.; Borges-Miquel, T.; Rodríguez-Delgado, M. Evaluation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes as solid-phase extraction adsorbents of pesticides from agricultural, ornamental and forestal soils. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 647, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, J.-X.; Jiang, D.-Q.; Gu, Z.-Y.; Yan, X.-P. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes coated fibers for solid-phase microextraction of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in water and milk samples before gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1137, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wu, F.; Lu, W.; Chen, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, L. Single-walled carbon nanotubes coated fibers for solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometric determination of pesticides in Tea samples. Talanta 2010, 82, 1038–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lü, J.; Liu, J.; Wei, Y.; Jiang, K.; Fan, S.; Liu, J.; Jiang, G. Preparation of single-walled carbon nanotube fiber coating for solid-phase microextraction of organochlorine pesticides in lake water and wastewater. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30, 2138–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Saraji, M.; Jafari, M.T.; Mossaddegh, M. Carbon nanotubes@ silicon dioxide nanohybrids coating for solid-phase microextraction of organophosphorus pesticides followed by gas chromatography–corona discharge ion mobility spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1429, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Wu, M.; Wang, L.; Zeng, B.; Zhao, F. Ionic liquid polymer functionalized carbon nanotubes-doped poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for highly-efficient solid-phase microextraction of carbamate pesticides. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1444, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. López-Feria, S.; Cárdenas, S.; Valcárcel, M. One step carbon nanotubes-based solid-phase extraction for the gas chromatographic–mass spectrometric multiclass pesticide control in virgin olive oils. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 7346–7350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Yao, Y.; Xu, F.; Chen, M.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, Z. Adsorption behavior of methylene blue on carbon nanotubes. Bioresource Technol. 2010, 101, 3040–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Poizot, P.; Laruelle, S.; Grugeon, S.; Dupont, L.; Tarascon, J. Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature 2000, 407, 496–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Frackowiak, E.; Beguin, F. Electrochemical storage of energy in carbon nanotubes and nanostructured carbons. Carbon 2002, 40, 1775–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chen, W.X.; Lee, J.Y.; Liu, Z. The nanocomposites of carbon nanotube with Sb and SnSb 0.5 as Li-ion battery anodes. Carbon 2003, 41, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Guoping, W.; Qingtang, Z.; Zuolong, Y.; MeiZheng, Q. The effect of different kinds of nano-carbon conductive additives in lithium ion batteries on the resistance and electrochemical behavior of the LiCoO2 composite cathodes. Solid State Ion. 2008, 179, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Maurin, G.; Bousquet, C.; Henn, F.; Bernier, P.; Almairac, R.; Simon, B. Electrochemical lithium intercalation into multiwall carbon nanotubes: A micro-Raman study. Solid State Ion. 2000, 136, 1295–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yang, Z.-H.; Wu, H.-Q. Electrochemical intercalation of lithium into raw carbon nanotubes. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2001, 71, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yang, S.; Song, H.; Chen, X.; Okotrub, A.; Bulusheva, L. Electrochemical performance of arc-produced carbon nanotubes as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 5286–5293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wu, G.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Yang, H.; Qi, Z.; He, P.; Li, W.Z. Structure and lithium insertion properties of carbon nanotubes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146, 1696–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Wang, G.; Ahn, J.-H.; Yao, J.; Lindsay, M.; Liu, H.; Dou, S. Preparation and characterization of carbon nanotubes for energy storage. J. Power Sources 2003, 119, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Eom, J.; Kwon, H.; Liu, J.; Zhou, O. Lithium insertion into purified and etched multi-walled carbon nanotubes synthesized on supported catalysts by thermal CVD. Carbon 2004, 42, 2589–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yang, S.; Huo, J.; Song, H.; Chen, X. A comparative study of electrochemical properties of two kinds of carbon nanotubes as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 2238–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kawasaki, S.; Hara, T.; Iwai, Y.; Suzuki, Y. Metallic and semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes as the anode material of Li ion secondary battery. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 2917–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. De las Casas, C.; Li, W. A review of application of carbon nanotubes for lithium ion battery anode material. J. Power Sources 2012, 208, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chen, M.; Liu, J.; Chao, D.; Wang, J.; Yin, J.; Lin, J.; Fan, H.J.; Shen, Z.X. Porous α-Fe2O3 nanorods supported on carbon nanotubes-graphene foam as superior anode for lithium ion batteries. Nano Energy 2014, 9, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cohn, A.P.; Oakes, L.; Carter, R.; Chatterjee, S.; Westover, A.S.; Share, K.; Pint, C.L. Assessing the improved performance of freestanding, flexible graphene and carbon nanotube hybrid foams for lithium ion battery anodes. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 4669–4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Huang, X.; Yu, H.; Tan, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Lv, Y.; Zeng, Z.; et al. Carbon Nanotube-Encapsulated Noble Metal Nanoparticle Hybrid as a Cathode Material for Li-Oxygen Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 6516–6523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, G.; Shen, X.; Yao, J.; Wexler, D.; Ahn, J.-H. Hydrothermal synthesis of carbon nanotube/cobalt oxide core-shell one-dimensional nanocomposite and application as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Qin, L.; Liang, S.; Pan, A.; Tan, X. Zn2SnO4/carbon nanotubes composite with enhanced electrochemical performance as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Mater. Lett. 2016, 164, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lee, J.H.; Yoon, C.S.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Kim, S.-J.; Maglia, F.; Lamp, P.; Myung, S.T.; Sun, Y.K. High-energy-density lithium-ion battery using a carbon-nanotube–Si composite anode and a compositionally graded Li [Ni0.85Co0.05Mn0.10] O2 cathode. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2152–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Garcia, J.; Gomes, H.; Serp, P.; Kalck, P.; Figueiredo, J.; Faria, J. Carbon nanotube supported ruthenium catalysts for the treatment of high strength wastewater with aniline using wet air oxidation. Carbon 2006, 44, 2384–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sarkar, B.; Mandal, S.; Tsang, Y.; Kumar, P.; Kim, K.; Ok, Y. Designer carbon nanotubes for contaminant removal in water and waste water: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 561–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Deligiorgis, A.; Xekoukoulotakis, N.P.; Diamadopoulos, E.; Mantzavinos, D. Electrochemical oxidation of table olive processing wastewater over boron-doped diamond electrodes: Treatment optimization by factorial design. Water Res. 2008, 42, 1229–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Jia, J. Improvement of electrochemical wastewater treatment through mass transfer in a seepage carbon nanotube electrode reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3796–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chen, G. Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 38, 11–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Qu, X.; Alvarez, P.J.; Li, Q. Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2013, 47, 3931–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Mubarak, N.; Sahu, J.; Abdullah, E.; Jayakumar, N. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using carbon nanotubes. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2014, 43, 311–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Simate, G.S.; Iyuke, S.E.; Ndlovu, S.; Heydenrych, M. The heterogeneous coagulation and flocculation of brewery wastewater using carbon nanotubes. Water Res. 2012, 46, 1185–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Zhang, L.; Xu, L.; He, J.; Zhang, J. Preparation of Ti/SnO2-Sb electrodes modified by carbon nanotube for anodic oxidation of dye wastewater and combination with nanofiltration. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 117, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Liu, Y.; Xie, J.; Ong, C.N.; Vecitis, C.D.; Zhou, Z. Electrochemical wastewater treatment with carbon nanotube filters coupled with in situ generated H2O2. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2015, 1, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, B.; Li, F.; Yang, P.; Yang, Y.; Hu, J.; Wei, J.; Yu, Q. In situ synthesis of diatomite−carbon Nanotube composite adsorbent and its adsorption characteristics for phenolic compounds. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2016, 64, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ma, J.; Ma, Y.; Yu, F. A novel one-pot route for large-scale synthesis of novel magnetic CNTs/Fe@C hybrids and their applications for binnary dye removal. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 8178–8191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lee, J.; Ye, Y.; Ward, A.; Zhou, C.; Chen, V.; Minett, A.; Lee, S.; Liu, Z.; Chae, S.; Shi, J. High flux and high selectivity carbon nanotube composite membranes for natural organic matter removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 163, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Qu, Y.; Ma, Q.; Deng, J.; Shen, W.; Zhang, X.; He, Z.; Nostrand, J.D.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, J. Responses of microbial communities to single-walled carbon nanotubes in phenol wastewater treatment systems. Enviorn. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 4627–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Song, Y.-C.; Woo, J.-H.; Yoo, K.-S. Materials for microbial fuel cell: Electrodes, separator and current collector. J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng. 2009, 31, 693–704. [Google Scholar]
  143. Lovat, V.; Pantarotto, D.; Lagostena, L.; Cacciari, B.; Grandolfo, M.; Righi, M.; Spalluto, G.; Prato, M.; Ballerini, L. Carbon nanotube substrates boost neuronal electrical signaling. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1107–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Wang, H.; Wu, Z.; Plaseied, A.; Jenkins, P.; Simpson, L.; Engtrakul, C.; Ren, Z. Carbon nanotube modified air-cathodes for electricity production in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 7465–7469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ghasemi, M.; Daud, W.R.W.; Hassan, S.H.; Jafary, T.; Rahimnejad, M.; Ahmad, A.; Yazdio, M.H. Carbon nanotube/polypyrrole nanocomposite as a novel cathode catalyst and proper alternative for Pt in microbial fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 4872–4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Hou, Y.; Yuan, H.; Wen, Z.; Cui, S.; Guo, X.; He, Z.; Chen, J. Nitrogen-doped graphene/CoNi alloy encased within bamboo-like carbon nanotube hybrids as cathode catalysts in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2016, 307, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. He, Y.-R.; Du, F.; Huang, Y.-X.; Dai, L.-M.; Li, W.-W.; Yu, H.-Q. Preparation of microvillus-like nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as the cathode of a microbial fuel cell. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1632–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sanchez, D.V.; Huynh, P.; Kozlov, M.E.; Baughman, R.H.; Vidic, R.D.; Yun, M. Carbon nanotube/platinum (Pt) sheet as an improved cathode for microbial fuel cells. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 5897–5902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ghasemi, M.; Ismail, M.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Saeedfar, K.; Daud, W.R.W.; Hassan, S.H.; Heng, L.Y.; Alam, J.; Oh, S.E. Carbon nanotube as an alternative cathode support and catalyst for microbial fuel cells. Appl. Energy 2013, 102, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ghasemi, M.; Shahgaldi, S.; Ismail, M.; Kim, B.H.; Yaakob, Z.; Daud, W.R.W. Activated carbon nanofibers as an alternative cathode catalyst to platinum in a two-chamber microbial fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 13746–13752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Feng, L.; Yan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L. Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as efficient and durable metal-free cathodic catalysts for oxygen reduction in microbial fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1892–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zou, L.; Qiao, Y.; Wu, X.-S.; Li, C.M. Tailoring hierarchically porous graphene architecture by carbon nanotube to accelerate extracellular electron transfer of anodic biofilm in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2016, 328, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ren, H.; Pyo, S.; Lee, J.-I.; Park, T.-J.; Gittleson, F.S.; Leung, F.C.; Kim, J.; Taylor, A.D.; Lee, H.S.; Chae, J. A high power density miniaturized microbial fuel cell having carbon nanotube anodes. J. Power Sources 2015, 273, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Qiao, Y.; Li, C.M.; Bao, S.-J.; Bao, Q.-L. Carbon nanotube/polyaniline composite as anode material for microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2007, 170, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Tsai, H.-Y.; Wu, C.-C.; Lee, C.-Y.; Shih, E.P. Microbial fuel cell performance of multiwall carbon nanotubes on carbon cloth as electrodes. J. Power Sources 2009, 194, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chou, H.-T.; Lee, H.-J.; Lee, C.-Y.; Tai, N.-H.; Chang, H.-Y. Highly durable anodes of microbial fuel cells using a reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube-coated scaffold. Bioresource Technol. 2014, 169, 532–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Yu, D.; Goh, K.; Wang, H.; Wei, L.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Dai, L.; Chen, Y. Scalable synthesis of hierarchically structured carbon nanotube-graphene fibres for capacitive energy storage. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Nützenadel, C.; Züttel, A.; Chartouni, D.; Schlapbach, L. Electrochemical storage of hydrogen in nanotube materials. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 1999, 2, 30–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Cheng, H.-M.; Yang, Q.-H.; Liu, C. Hydrogen storage in carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2001, 39, 1447–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Dresselhaus, M.; Williams, K.; Eklund, P. Hydrogen adsorption in carbon materials. Mrs Bull. 1999, 24, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Panella, B.; Hirscher, M.; Roth, S. Hydrogen adsorption in different carbon nanostructures. Carbon 2005, 43, 2209–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jordá-Beneyto, M.; Suárez-García, F.; Lozano-Castelló, D.; Cazorla-Amorós, D.; Linares-Solano, A. Hydrogen storage on chemically activated carbons and carbon nanomaterials at high pressures. Carbon 2007, 45, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ariharan, A.; Viswanathan, B.; Nandhakumar, V. Hydrogen storage on boron substituted carbon materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 3527–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Zhao, T.; Ji, X.; Jin, W.; Yang, W.; Li, T. Hydrogen storage capacity of single-walled carbon nanotube prepared by a modified arc discharge. Fuller. Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct. 2017, 25, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Silambarasan, D.; Surya, V.; Vasu, V.; Iyakutti, K. One-step process of hydrogen storage in single walled carbon nanotubes-tin oxide nano composite. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 4011–4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Cho, J.H.; Yang, S.J.; Lee, K.; Park, C.R. Si-doping effect on the enhanced hydrogen storage of single walled carbon nanotubes and graphene. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 12286–12295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Shin, W.H.; Jeong, H.M.; Kim, B.G.; Kang, J.K.; Choi, J.W. Nitrogen-doped multiwall carbon nanotubes for lithium storage with extremely high capacity. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2283–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Shimoda, H.; Gao, B.; Tang, X.; Kleinhammes, A.; Fleming, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, O. Lithium intercalation into opened single-wall carbon nanotubes: Storage capacity and electronic properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 88, 015502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Frackowiak, E.; Metenier, K.; Bertagna, V.; Beguin, F. Supercapacitor electrodes from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 2421–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wang, Y.; Fugetsu, B.; Wang, Z.; Gong, W.; Sakata, I.; Morimoto, S.; Hashimoto, Y.; Endo, M.; Dresselhaus, M.; Terrones, M. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon monoliths from polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and carbon nanotubes as electrodes for supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cheng, Y.; Lu, S.; Zhang, H.; Varanasi, C.V.; Liu, J. Synergistic effects from graphene and carbon nanotubes enable flexible and robust electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4206–4211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Futaba, D.N.; Hata, K.; Yamada, T.; Hiraoka, T.; Hayamizu, Y.; Kakudate, Y.; Tanaike, O.; Hatori, H.; Yumura, M.; Iijima, S. Shape-engineerable and highly densely packed single-walled carbon nanotubes and their application as super-capacitor electrodes. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Pham, D.T.; Lee, T.H.; Luong, D.H.; Yao, F.; Ghosh, A.; Le, V.T.; Kim, T.H.; Li, B.; Chang, J.; Lee, Y.H. Carbon nanotube-bridged graphene 3D building blocks for ultrafast compact supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2018–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Froudakis, G. Hydrogen storage in nanotubes & nanostructures. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 324–328. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The conceptual diagram showing the general dimensions of the length and width of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) [2].
Figure 1. The conceptual diagram showing the general dimensions of the length and width of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) [2].
Materials 13 01679 g001
Figure 2. An overview of the properties of CNTs and with synthetic and transdermal applications. Various properties of CNTs enabling them to be used as the transdermal applications are depicted. Additionally, synthetic applications of CNTs are also depicted.
Figure 2. An overview of the properties of CNTs and with synthetic and transdermal applications. Various properties of CNTs enabling them to be used as the transdermal applications are depicted. Additionally, synthetic applications of CNTs are also depicted.
Materials 13 01679 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic representation of how a graphene sheet is rolled to form three chiralities of nanotubes: (b) zigzag, (c) armchair, and (d) chiral nanotubes [39].
Figure 3. (a) Schematic representation of how a graphene sheet is rolled to form three chiralities of nanotubes: (b) zigzag, (c) armchair, and (d) chiral nanotubes [39].
Materials 13 01679 g003
Figure 4. (a) Transmission electron microscopy images of plant cells. Green arrows indicate chloroplasts in (i,v); black arrows indicate the cell wall for (iv,vii,ix); navy blue arrows indicate CNTs deposition for (iii,vi,vii,viii,x); and light blue arrows indicate cell membrane in (iv,vii,ix) [73]. (ii) Growth enhancement on (b) switch grass and (c) sorghum seedlings by exposure to carbon-based nanomaterials. Effects on growth of bioenergy crops by CNTs added to growth medium. Measurements were performed on 10-day-old seedlings (n = 30 for both sorghum and switch grass). (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01) [75].
Figure 4. (a) Transmission electron microscopy images of plant cells. Green arrows indicate chloroplasts in (i,v); black arrows indicate the cell wall for (iv,vii,ix); navy blue arrows indicate CNTs deposition for (iii,vi,vii,viii,x); and light blue arrows indicate cell membrane in (iv,vii,ix) [73]. (ii) Growth enhancement on (b) switch grass and (c) sorghum seedlings by exposure to carbon-based nanomaterials. Effects on growth of bioenergy crops by CNTs added to growth medium. Measurements were performed on 10-day-old seedlings (n = 30 for both sorghum and switch grass). (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01) [75].
Materials 13 01679 g004
Figure 5. ConCap response curves toward penicillin G detection at different concentrations for LB film-incorporated EIS sensors: (a) seven-layer DMPA-penicillinase; (b) one-layer DMPA-CNTs-PEN; and (c) seven-layer DMPA-CNTs-PEN. (d) Calibration curve of ConCap responses for the LB films correlated with penicillin concentrations [93].
Figure 5. ConCap response curves toward penicillin G detection at different concentrations for LB film-incorporated EIS sensors: (a) seven-layer DMPA-penicillinase; (b) one-layer DMPA-CNTs-PEN; and (c) seven-layer DMPA-CNTs-PEN. (d) Calibration curve of ConCap responses for the LB films correlated with penicillin concentrations [93].
Materials 13 01679 g005
Figure 6. Ag-CNT-PDMS-based wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological conditions of the human body. (ae) SEM morphologies of the wrinkled CNTs (left) and Ag/CNT/PDMS nanocomposite films under variant strain and release conditions (1 µm). (f) Schematic illustration of sensor location and its application. (g) Signals received from the finger-bending involving the normal bending (blue) and stimulated bending (red). (h–j) Signal from wrist, upper lip, and chest showing the significant change in peak [92].
Figure 6. Ag-CNT-PDMS-based wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological conditions of the human body. (ae) SEM morphologies of the wrinkled CNTs (left) and Ag/CNT/PDMS nanocomposite films under variant strain and release conditions (1 µm). (f) Schematic illustration of sensor location and its application. (g) Signals received from the finger-bending involving the normal bending (blue) and stimulated bending (red). (h–j) Signal from wrist, upper lip, and chest showing the significant change in peak [92].
Materials 13 01679 g006
Figure 7. (a) Comparison of the performance of carboxylated (c)-SWCNTs and MWCNTs for the isolation of the selected pesticides from virgin olive oil samples. (b) Influence of the amount of c-SWCNTs packed in the solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge for the preconcentration of the selected pesticides from virgin olive oil samples [107].
Figure 7. (a) Comparison of the performance of carboxylated (c)-SWCNTs and MWCNTs for the isolation of the selected pesticides from virgin olive oil samples. (b) Influence of the amount of c-SWCNTs packed in the solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge for the preconcentration of the selected pesticides from virgin olive oil samples [107].
Materials 13 01679 g007
Figure 8. Schematic diagram representing different modification processes of CNTs for contaminant removal from water and wastewater (C: carbon; CNT: carbon nanotube; ENVT: environmental; Hg: mercury; KOH: potassium hydroxide) [129].
Figure 8. Schematic diagram representing different modification processes of CNTs for contaminant removal from water and wastewater (C: carbon; CNT: carbon nanotube; ENVT: environmental; Hg: mercury; KOH: potassium hydroxide) [129].
Materials 13 01679 g008
Figure 9. (a) (i) Adsorption capacities and (ii) their changes in single and binary dye systems. (b) Adsorption isotherms of methyl orange (MO) (iii) and methylene blue (MB) (iv) on CNTs/Fe@C fitted by the Langmuir and Freundlich models. The maximum adsorption capacity of MO (v) and MB (vi) increased with the concentration of the other dye [139].
Figure 9. (a) (i) Adsorption capacities and (ii) their changes in single and binary dye systems. (b) Adsorption isotherms of methyl orange (MO) (iii) and methylene blue (MB) (iv) on CNTs/Fe@C fitted by the Langmuir and Freundlich models. The maximum adsorption capacity of MO (v) and MB (vi) increased with the concentration of the other dye [139].
Materials 13 01679 g009
Figure 10. Hydrogen storage in nanotube bundles. Snapshots from grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations taken under 100 Bar pressure at 77 K (left), 175 K (middle), and 293 K (right) [173].
Figure 10. Hydrogen storage in nanotube bundles. Snapshots from grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations taken under 100 Bar pressure at 77 K (left), 175 K (middle), and 293 K (right) [173].
Materials 13 01679 g010
Table 1. Comparative study between single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [2].
Table 1. Comparative study between single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [2].
Single layer of grapheneMultiple layer of graphene
Thermal conductivity in the range of 6000 W/m·KThermal conductivity in the range of 3000 W/m·K
Semiconducting and metallic properties (excellent field emission capability)Low physical properties
Bulk synthesis is difficult Easy to synthesis in bulk
Easily twistedDifficult to twist
Catalyst needed for synthesisManufactured without catalyst
Low purityHigh purity
Less accumulation bodyGreater accumulation in body
More defection during the functionalizationLess defection, but hard to improve
Table 2. A comparative study of different types of methods used in the synthesis of CNTs.
Table 2. A comparative study of different types of methods used in the synthesis of CNTs.
MethodsArc DischargeLaser VaporizationChemical Vapor DepositionVapor Phase Growth
ConditionVoltage 25–60 V
Current 50–100 A
Temperature 1200 °C and pressure 500 TorrTemperature 550–1000 °C at atmospheric pressureSupplying reaction gas and organometallic catalyst in the reactor
GraphiteGraphiteFossil-based hydrocarbon,
botanical hydrocarbon
AdvantageExcellent crystallinityHigh quality,
high yield compared with arc discharge
Can be controlledCould be produce in bulk
DisadvantageDifficult to obtain uniform length nanotube,
contain a large amount of impurities
Difficult to maintenance,
low production,
Affected the temperature change and position,
relatively crystallinity
Table 3. The effects of different carbon nanomaterials (CNMs) on plant and crop growth.
Table 3. The effects of different carbon nanomaterials (CNMs) on plant and crop growth.
Type of CNMsPlantTreatmentEffectReference
MWCNTs and oxidized MWCNTs (o-MWCNTs)Brassica juncea (mustard) seeds23 × 10−3 and 46 × 10−3 mg/mL of MWCNTs for 5 and 10 days and
2.3 × 10−3 and 6.9 × 10−3 mg/mL of o-MWCNTs for 5 and 10 days, respectively
After 10 days, seedlings treated with low concentration of o-MWCNTs developed the highest shoot (4.2 cm) and root (5.8 cm) length. Seeds treated with a low concentration of MWCNTs also showed shoot about 1.5 times and root about two times longer than original seeds[64]
Fullerol and MWCNTsTomato seeds50 mg/L and exposure ranged from 0 to 60 min (0, 5, 10, 30, or 60 min)When exposed for a short period of 5 min, the germination rate was higher than that of the control group and showed no harm to germination[65]
Single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNHs)Barley, Corn, Rice, Soybean, Switchgrass, Tomato25, 50, and 100 μg/mL for 2 and 6 daysThe highest germination rate was recorded for barley, corn, rice, and switchgrass seeds exposed to 100 μg/mL SWCNHs and the highest germination rate was observed at 25 μg/mL SWCNHs in tomato seeds[66]
MWCNTsBroccoli10 mg/L MWCNTs, 100 mM NaCl, and 100 mM NaCl + 10 mg/L MWCNTsThe MWCNTs-treated plants had positive effects on growth compared with the control and NaCl alone application[67]
MWCNTsBarley, Soybean, Corn25, 50, and 100 μg/mL for 2 and 6 daysAfter six days, all seeds treated with MWCNT reached a germination rate of 100% compared with control seeds reaching a germination rate of 63%[68]
MWCNTsTomato plants 50 and 200 μg/mLThe CNT-treated tomato plants produced twice as many flowers as the control plants[69]
CNTsRice50, 100, and 150 μg/mLCNTs at appropriate concentrations (~100 μg/mL) promoted rice seed germination and root growth[70]
SWCNTs and functionalized SWCNTsCucumber, Onion28, 160, 900, and 5000 mg/L for 2 and 3 daysNon-functionalized CNTs enhanced root elongation in onion and cucumber, the effects were more pronounced at 24 h than at 48 h[71]
SWCNTs (non-functionalized, OH-functionalized, or surfactant stabilized)Corn0, 10, and 100 mg/kgRoot length was significantly higher in plants exposed to non-functional SWNT 100 mg/kg and plant root uptake also followed the trend of non-functionalized > surfactant stabilized > OH-functionalized[74]
Table 4. The effects of CNMs in the solid-phase extraction (SPE) technique.
Table 4. The effects of CNMs in the solid-phase extraction (SPE) technique.
CNTsAnalyteSampleCNTs Amount (mg)Recovery (%)Reference
MWCNTsDisulfoton sulfoxide, ethoprophos, disulfoton, terbufos sulfone, cadusafos, dimethoate, terbufos, chlorpyrifos-methyl, fenitrothion, malaoxon, pirimiphosmethyl, malathion, chlorpyrifos, disulfoton sulfone, and fensulfothionWater (run-off, mineral, and tap water)13067–107[94]
GO–MCNTs-diethylenetriamineCr(III), Fe(III), Pb(II), and Mn(II) ionsWastewater3095[95]
MWCNTsOrganophosphateGarlic 1.297–104[97]
MWCNTs4-Chlorophenol, 3-chlorophenol, dichlorophenol, trichlorophenol, and pentachlorophenolRiver water30093–117[98]
MWCNTsTolclofos-methyl, fenitrothin, malathion, phorate, diazinon, isocarbophos, and quinalphos phenamiphosPeanut oil10086–115[99]
MWCNTsEthoprophos, diazinon, fenitrothion, malathion, and phosmetAgricultural soil, forestal soil, and ornamental soil10054–91[101]
Table 5. The effects of CNMs in the solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) technique.
Table 5. The effects of CNMs in the solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) technique.
CNTs AnalyteSampleCNTs Amount (mg) Recovery (%)Reference
MWCNTsPolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs)River water, waste water, milk20 mg90–119[102]
SWCNTsEthoprophos, terbufos, thiometon, tefluthrin, iprobenfos, vinclozolin, octachlorodipropyl ether, isofenphos, phenthoate, chlorfenapyr, propiconazol, Ethyl-p-nitrophenylthionobenzenephosphonate (EPN), and λ-cyhalothrinTeas (green tea, oolong tea, white tea, and flower tea)-75–118[103]
SWCNTsHexachlorcyclohexan, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethaneLake water2 g88–111[104]
CNTs–silicon dioxide Diazinon, fenthion, parathion, and chlorpyrifosRiver water and agricultural wastewater, pear, grape, and eggplant50 mg79–99[105]
Table 6. The electrochemical performances of CNTs-based Li-ion batteries. CVD, chemical vapor deposition.
Table 6. The electrochemical performances of CNTs-based Li-ion batteries. CVD, chemical vapor deposition.
CNMsMethodCurrent DensityInitial Discharge Capacity (mA·h/g)CyclesResidual Reversible Capacity (mA·h/g)Reference
CNTs–SnSb0.5CVD50 mA/g54930369[111]
CNTs–LiCoO2CVD0.2 C11820118[112]
CNTsarc discharge2 C300300255[114]
MWCNTsarc discharge0.2 mA cm−211730113[115]
Short CNTsCVD0.8 mA cm−249130170[119]
Fe2O3/CNT–graphene foamCVD200 mA/g119010900[122]
CNTs–cobalt oxide 0.1 C1250100530[125]
Zn2SnO4/CNT 100 mA/g1925.430703.8[126]
Table 7. Applications of CNMs in wastewater treatment. COD, chemical oxygen demand.
Table 7. Applications of CNMs in wastewater treatment. COD, chemical oxygen demand.
ApplicationsDesirable Nanomaterials PropertiesType of CNMsEfficiency of the CNMsReference
CatalystsHigher catalyst loads and stability, stronger metal–support interactions, high dispersion, high stability and activity, low costRuthenium/MWCNT-COOH-Na2CO398.3% and 70.3% aniline and total organic carbon (TOC) removals[128]
Ruthenium/MWCNT-COOH89.9% and 53.7% aniline and TOC removals[128]
Mass TransferFacilitate contaminant mass transfer, large surface areas, high electrochemical efficiency, degrade organics with much higher current Efficiency and lower energy consumption CNTsThe efficiency was 340–519% higher than the conventional reactor, and the energy consumption was only 16.5–22.3% of the conventional reactor[131]
AdsorptionLarge specific surface areas, high chemical and thermal stabilities, high aspect ratios, exceptional mechanical strength, diverse contaminant–CNT interactionsSWCNTs, MWCNTsThe maximum zinc adsorption capacities of SWCNTs and MWCNTs were 43.66 and 32.68 mg/g, respectively, in the initial zinc ion concentration range (10–80 mg/L)[134]
Flocculation Exceptional adsorption capabilities and efficiencies, larger surface area, affinity towards target compoundsCNTsDemonstrated the ability to successfully coagulate colloidal particles in the brewery wastewater[135]
ElectrodeEffective compound adsorption and oxidation, high energy efficiency, fast reaction rate, electrochemical oxidationTi/SnO2-Sb-CNT electrode80.12% and 46.01% COD and TOC removals [136]
Table 8. The effects of the carbon-based electrode on microbial fuel cells (MFCs).
Table 8. The effects of the carbon-based electrode on microbial fuel cells (MFCs).
Type of ElectrodeMFCsType of MFCsEffectPower Density
(Max.) mW/m
Graphite fiber Carbon nanotube/PtEffluent from an air-cathode MFCSingle chamber MFCsThe cathode had a maximum power density of about two times higher than that of the carbon cloth cathode329[144]
Carbon paperCNTs/Poly-pyrrole Anaerobic digester sludge collected from Indah Water Konsortium treated Palm oil mill effluent (POME)Two cubic shaped chambers COD removal of the system using CNT/PPy was 96%113.5[145]
Carbon clothN-CNTs on carbon clothAcetate-laden synthetic wastewaterAir-cathode cylindrical-shaped MFCs, dual chamberThe maximum power density was about 9% higher than that of Pt-carbon on carbon cloth135[147]
Carbon paperCNTs/PtPalm oil mill effluent (POME- Selangor, Malaysia) sludgeTwo cylindrical H-shaped chambersThe composite electrode increased the power output of MFC by 8.7~32% compared with Pt electrode169.7[149]
Carbon paperChemically activated carbon nanofibersPalm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic (Selangor, Malaysia) sludge Two cylindrical and H-shaped chambers COD removal was approximately 82.3% and could generate up to 3.17 times more power than carbon paper61.3[150]
Carbon fiberNitrogen-doped CNTs (N-CNTs)20% domestic wastewater collected from a municipal wastewater treatment plant of Shanghai, ChinaAir-cathode single chamber MFCsThe power density drop rate was low, so electricity can be produced more permanently than the platinum catalyst1600 ± 50[151]
MWCNT/ rGO-biofilm carbon fiber brush S. putrefaciens CN32 cell suspension was inoculated on bacteria H-type dual-chamber Composite electrodes provide higher maximum power density than individual MWCNTs and rGO789[152]
Vertically Aligned CNTsCr/Au filmAcetate-fed microbial electrolytic cells (MEC) with Geobacter-enriched bacterial community from anaerobic digestion sludge
Dual chamber MFCs; anode and cathode chambers
61.3% of Coulombic efficiency270[153]
Randomly Aligned CNTsCr/Au film73% of Coulombic efficiency540
Spin/spray layer-by-layer CNTsCr/Au film73% of Coulombic efficiency540
CNTs/polyaniline (PANI) PtBacteriaE. coli-based MFCsComposite electrodes containing 20 wt.% CNTs provide high discharge performance and high power output42[154]
CNTsCNTs/PtBacteriaAir-cathode MFCsCOD removal was 95% and the maximum coulombic efficiency was 67%65[155]
rGO-CNT sponges-Anaerobic sludgeAerobic chamber and anoxic chamberProduced higher durabilityMax. current density of 335 A m−3[156]
Table 9. Hydrogen storage efficiency of different kinds of CNMs at different conditions.
Table 9. Hydrogen storage efficiency of different kinds of CNMs at different conditions.
CNMsStorage (wt.%)Temperature (K)Pressure (MPa)Reference
Chemically activated carbon5.6774[162]
Carbon with boron5.929810[163]
Si-doped SWCNTs2.529810[166]
Un-doped SWCNTs1.429810

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patel, D.K.; Kim, H.-B.; Dutta, S.D.; Ganguly, K.; Lim, K.-T. Carbon Nanotubes-Based Nanomaterials and Their Agricultural and Biotechnological Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 1679.

AMA Style

Patel DK, Kim H-B, Dutta SD, Ganguly K, Lim K-T. Carbon Nanotubes-Based Nanomaterials and Their Agricultural and Biotechnological Applications. Materials. 2020; 13(7):1679.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patel, Dinesh K., Hye-Been Kim, Sayan Deb Dutta, Keya Ganguly, and Ki-Taek Lim. 2020. "Carbon Nanotubes-Based Nanomaterials and Their Agricultural and Biotechnological Applications" Materials 13, no. 7: 1679.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop