Next Article in Journal
Dense KNN Polycrystals Doped by Er2O3 Obtained by Hot Pressing with Hexagonal Boron Nitride Protective Layer
Next Article in Special Issue
Repair of a Cracked Historic Maryan Bell by Gas Welding
Previous Article in Journal
On the Elemental Impact Factor, a Method to Determine an Alloy’s Compositional Influences upon Phase Stability and Metallurgical Material Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Optimization of Tin/Flux Mixture for Direct Tinning and Interfacial Bonding in Aluminum/Steel Bimetallic Compound Casting
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 24
10.3390/ma13245750
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Chromium and Molybdenum Addition on the Microstructure of In Situ TiC-Reinforced Composite Surface Layers Fabricated on Ductile Cast Iron by Laser Alloying

by
Damian Janicki
Department of Welding, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Materials 2020, 13(24), 5750; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245750
Submission received: 9 November 2020 / Revised: 7 December 2020 / Accepted: 11 December 2020 / Published: 16 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Material and Technological Solutions in Foundry Engineering)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In situ TiC-reinforced composite surface layers (TRLs) were produced on a ductile cast iron substrate by laser surface alloying (LA) using pure Ti powder and mixtures of Ti-Cr and Ti-Mo powders. During LA with pure Ti, the intensity of fluid flow in the molten pool, which determines the TRL’s compositional uniformity, and thus Ti content in the alloyed zone, was directly affected by the fraction of synthesized TiC particles in the melt—with increasing the TiC fraction, the convection was gradually reduced. The introduction of additional Cr or Mo powders into the molten pool, due to their beneficial effect on the intensity of the molten pool convection, elevated the Ti concentration in the melt, and, thus, the TiC fraction in the TRL. It was found that the melt enrichment of Cr, in conjunction with non-equilibrium cooling conditions, suppressed the martensitic transformation of the matrix, which lowered the total hardness of the TRL. Moreover, the presence of Cr in the melt (~3 wt%) altered the growth morphology of the synthesized primary TiC precipitates compared with that obtained using pure Ti. The addition of Mo in the melt produced (Ti, Mo)C primary precipitates that exhibited a nonuniform Mo distribution (coring structure). The dissolution of Mo in the primary TiC precipitates did not affect its growth morphology.

1. Introduction

Recently, there has been considerable interest in improving the wear properties of machine parts’ working surfaces made from ductile cast iron (DCI) using laser surface treatment methods [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. A highly effective approach to enhance the wear properties of metallic substrates is the formation of metal matrix composite (MMC) surface layers via laser alloying (LA) [8,9,10]. The wear performance of MMC materials is strongly affected by the morphology, fraction, and types of reinforcing particles, as well as the microstructure of the matrix [11,12,13]. Thus, the processing conditions and the chemical composition of the alloying material are extremely important to obtain the desired wear properties [14]. Depending on the chemistry of the alloying material, LA can produce MMC surface layers on cast iron substrates using both ex-situ and in situ routes [15,16,17]. The in situ MMCs offer the advantage of stronger interfacial bonding between reinforcements and matrix materials than ex-situ MMCs. Moreover, the in situ synthesized reinforcing phases exhibit higher chemical and thermal stability (long-term stability) [18,19]. High C contents in cast iron substrates provide excellent conditions for the in situ formation of MMC surface layers via LA, with elements that tend to form carbides. Several studies on the LA of cast iron substrates have focused on the in situ synthesis of TiC-reinforced layers (TRLs) by introducing Ti into the molten pool [16,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. From the point of view of the wear properties, the microstructure of the synthesized TRLs should contain a martensitic matrix with homogeneously-dispersed TiC precipitates [24,26]. Moreover, published data on the wear performance of Fe-based MMCs reinforced with TiC phase suggest a significant increase in the wear resistance of TRLs with increasing the TiC fraction [24,26,27,28,29]. However, reported works have shown that during the in situ synthesis of TRLs on cast iron substrates via LA, it is difficult to maintain a homogeneous dispersion of the reinforcing phase upon increasing the Ti concentration in the melt [23]. As a consequence, control over the fraction and growth morphology of the TiC particles, and also the phase composition of the matrix, is highly limited.
Previous studies [23,24,25] were undertaken to determine the feasibility of the in situ synthesis of TRLs on the DCI substrate via LA with pure Ti powder. The aim of that investigation was to establish the processing conditions that allowed the use of the entire C content in the processed substrate to optimize the TRL’s microstructure, i.e., to achieve the highest possible TiC fraction and a fully martensitic matrix. However, the results indicated that a limited amount of Ti can be introduced into the molten pool while maintaining a homogeneous dispersion of the reinforcing phase in the matrix. This limitation was a consequence of a gradual decrease in the intensity of the fluid flow in the molten pool with an increasing TiC fraction in the melt.
In general, the current work extends the concept outlined in earlier works, with an emphasis on assessing the possibility of influencing both the microstructural characteristics of TRL and the intensity of the fluid flow in the molten pool by properly selecting the alloying material chemistry. The primary objective was to determine the effect of the presence of additional Cr and Mo in the molten pool, during the LA of the DCI substrate with Ti, on the growth morphology of TiC particles and also the microstructure of the matrix.

2. Materials and Methods

50 × 50 × 10 mm plates of DCI-grade EN-GJS-700-2 were used as a substrate material (SM). The SM composition, as analyzed by glow discharge optical emission spectrometry, is given in Table 1. The alloying materials were prepared using commercially available powders of pure Ti (99% purity, the particle size range of 45 to 70 µm, H.C. Starck), pure Cr (99% purity, the particle size range of 45 to 70 µm, abcr GmbH), and pure Mo (99.95% purity, the particle size range of 5 to 10 µm, abcr GmbH). Based on unpublished work [30], Ti-Mo and Ti-Cr powder mixtures were prepared in weight percentage ratios of 80–20. The main purpose of the additional introduction of Cr and Mo powders into the molten pool during the synthesis of TRLs was to affect the morphology and composition of the reinforcing phase (TiC precipitates) and also the phase composition of the matrix material. For comparative purposes, the alloying process was also conducted with pure Ti powder.
The LA trials were conducted using an experimental setup with a diode laser (DL020, Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). A detailed description of the experimental setup and the laser processing conditions are given elsewhere [24]. A laser beam spot size (rectangular in shape) was 1.5 × 6.6 mm. During all trials, the laser spot was located on the top surface of SM, and the fast-axis of the laser beam was set parallel to the scanning direction. Based on previous work [23,24,25], the laser power and traverse speed were held constant at 1500 W and 1.25 mm/s, respectively. The powder feed rates depended on the type of the alloying material and are listed in Table 2.
To investigate the influence of the alloying material chemistry on the maximal possible Ti concentration in the molten pool and the compositional homogeneity of the alloyed zone, single-alloyed beads (SAB) were produced (Table 2). For microstructure analysis of the TRLs synthesized at different melt compositions, surface alloyed layers (SAL) were produced via a multi-pass overlapping alloying process with an overlap ratio of 30% (Table 3 and Table 4). Abbreviations used in the manuscript are also listed in Appendix A.
Geometrical parameters of SABs and SALs were measured with an optical microscope (Eclipse MA100, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and image processing software Nikon NIS-EBR (ver. 3.13, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
The microstructure of TRLs was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis and X-ray diffraction (XRD). EDS measurements were performed at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. EDAX Genesis software (ver. 6.0, EDAX Inc., Mahwah, NJ, USA) was used for the collection and analysis of EDS data. The quantitative EDS analysis was made to estimate the concentration of the alloying material in the matrix and also to confirm the compositional homogeneity of the alloyed layers. Additionally, chemical analysis of the SM and SALs was performed on ground surface specimens using a LECO GDS 500A optical emission spectrometer (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). The C concentration in the SM was determined using a LECO CS125 Carbon Analyzer (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). The procedures and equipment used during microstructural characterization are described in greater detail elsewhere [24,25].
Hardness measurements were made on cross-sections of SALs using a Vickers hardness tester (401 MVD, Wilson Wolpert Instruments, Aachen, Germany). Hardness profiles were determined with a 200 g load. The matrix material hardness was measured with a 25 g load applied over 10 s.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Macrostructure Analysis

Figure 1 and Figure 2 present a series of cross-sectional optical macrographs of the SABs produced using Ti-Cr and Ti-Mo powder mixtures respectively, at different powder feed rates. The corresponding cross-sectional areas of the SAB and concentrations of alloying elements in the bead are summarized in Table 2. A detailed description of the effect of the powder feed rate of pure Ti on the shape of the alloyed zone can be found in previous works [23,24,25]. It has been reported that, during synthesis with pure Ti powder, the presence of TiC precipitates in the melt leads to a decrease in the intensity of the fluid flow in the molten pool, which reduces the compositional homogeneity of the alloyed zone [24,25]. Table 2 shows that for SABs produced using a pure Ti, upon increasing the Ti content, i.e., upon increasing the fraction of TiC precipitates in the melt, the fusion area of the SAB decreased. The reduction of the fusion area is, to a certain extent, associated with the fact that the energy of the laser beam melts the alloying powder. On the other hand, the TiC precipitates formed due to an exothermic reaction between Ti and C in the molten pool. Consequently, the higher fraction of TiC precipitates (associated with a higher Ti concentration in the melt) leads to a larger amount of heat generated directly in the molten pool. However, the calculation of the heat generated during the reaction between Ti and C for the TiC content of 15 vol% (SAB no. T2, Table 2) indicated that its value is negligible (~18 J/mm) compared with the heat input of the process (1200 J/mm—the ratio of the laser power and the traverse speed). The above calculations considered the value of enthalpy (ΔH = −203 kJ/mol [31]) of the formation of TiC at 2000 °C (the temperature established during examination of the thermal conditions in the molten pool [32]).
Interestingly, the use of a Ti-Cr powder mixture increased the fusion zone upon increasing the amount of alloying material introduced into the molten pool in the optimal powder feed rate range (Table 2). The fusion zone shape of SABs produced with Cr addition indicates that the coefficient of the surface tension temperature on the molten pool surface was positive, producing fluid flow inward along the molten pool surface [33,34,35]. The increase in the powder feed rate increased the fluid flow intensity, leading to a deeper molten pool. In the case of the Ti-Mo mixture, despite an increased powder feed rate, the cross-sectional area of the SAB was generally constant within the optimal powder feed rate range.
From the point of view of shaping the TRL’s microstructure, the use of a complex powder mixture increased the amount of alloying materials in the molten pool at a given heat input (Table 2). This, in turn, significantly increased the Ti content and, thus, the TiC fraction in the uniformly alloyed bead compared with that processed with pure Ti (Table 3). Additionally, the homogeneity of the TiC dispersion throughout the alloyed zone was also improved (Figure 3). Note that, based on the thermodynamic calculations (for 3.6 wt% of C in the DCI substrate), the Ti concentration leading to the formation of a microstructure composed of TiC precipitates embedded in a martensitic matrix was estimated to be in the range of 12 to 13 wt% [24,25]. In the case of SABs made with an 80Ti-20Cr powder mixture, the Ti content reached 11.6 wt% (SAB no. TC3, Table 2). The multi-pass overlapping alloying process under the above processing conditions using an overlap ratio of 30% ensured the production of homogenous SALs (TRC, Table 3) with average Ti and Cr contents of 12.4 and 2.9 wt% respectively, and a uniform thickness of ~1.9 mm (Figure 4a). In turn, the use of the 80Ti-20Mo powder mixture produced a uniform SAB containing up to 9.9 wt% Ti and 2.8 wt% Mo (SAB no. TM3, Table 2). The corresponding SALs (TRM, Table 3) produced at an overlap ratio of 30% contained about 10.5 wt% Ti and 3.1 wt% Mo. The thickness of this SAL was about 1.6 mm (Figure 4b).
Regardless of the used alloying material, both SABs and SALs contained cracks induced due to a lack of preheating the substrate. The chemistry of alloying material had little effect on the cracking tendency of the alloyed zone. All types of SALs exhibited minor porosity and negligible tendency to a formation of microvoids.
It should be pointed out that the research program adopted in the presented work was not directly aimed at fully understanding the above effect of Cr and Mo on the heat and fluid flow phenomena in the molten pool during the investigated LA process. The complexity of the heat and mass transfer phenomena in the molten pool, especially comprising the significant changes in the surface and bulk chemical composition of the molten pool, requires a detailed examination using both experimental and numerical approaches. However, the results of the performed research revealed a possible factor that may affect the observed changes in the intensity of the fluid flow in the molten pool.
It is well known that mass transport in the molten pool can be substantially altered by the presence of surface-active trace elements such as sulfur and oxygen. Additionally, it is well documented [33,34] that in the case of Fe-based alloys, surface-active trace elements affect the molten pool shape by altering surface tension gradients, leading to changes in both the magnitude of fluid flow and its direction in the molten pool. The chemical analysis presented in Table 4 revealed a significantly elevated S content in all SALs compared with that of the as-received DCI (Table 1). The S content in the as-received DCI was approximately 0.005 wt%. In the case of the SALs produced with added pure Ti powder, the S content gradually increased upon increasing the Ti concentration [25], i.e., with increasing the powder feed rate, and reached 0.148 wt%. The SALs produced using powder mixtures of 80Ti-20Cr and 80Ti-20Mo under the optimal processing parameters exhibited essentially the same sulfur content of 0.180 wt%. Thus, the elevated S content in all types of SALs was associated with the purity of the alloying powders. Based upon investigations on the heat transport in the molten pool [35], which indicate that small concentrations of surface-active elements can significantly alter the magnitude of surface tension, it is suggested that the above differences in the S content may affect the intensity of fluid flow in the molten pool.
Summarizing the above results, the introduction of additional Cr or Mo powder into the molten pool during the LA of the DCI with Ti powder enables significantly higher Ti concentrations in the uniform SAL relative to that achieved using a pure Ti powder by influencing the intensity of fluid flow in the molten pool. However, a full understanding of this phenomenon requires additional examinations and presents a challenge for further research.

3.2. Microstructural Analysis

BSE SEM micrographs taken from different locations of the TRC and TRM are presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. Representative XRD patterns for TRC and TRM are presented in Figure 7a,b, respectively. A detailed microstructural characteristic of TRL synthesized during LA with a pure Ti powder is presented in previous works [23,24,25]. The chemical compositions and microstructural parameters of the TRLs produced using all types of alloying materials are outlined in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively.
The micrograph analysis showed that the TRC and TRM exhibit a highly uniform distribution of TiC precipitates throughout the matrix and have similar fractions of about 21 vol%. This TiC fraction is close to that predicted by the thermodynamic calculations for the processed DCI substrate [24,25]. As a result, both the TRC and TRM contained minor fractions of the cementite phase (~2 vol%). Moreover, in contrast to the TRLs formed with pure Ti [25], there is no evidence of graphitization in the heat-affected zone (HAZ) between consecutive beads in SALs (Figure 5b and Figure 6d). As can be seen from Figure 5c and Figure 6c, the obtained TRC and TRM compositions also led to the formation of fine eutectic precipitates of the TiC phase with a plate-like morphology.
The microstructure of the TRC also contained a minor amount of fine eutectic-like regions that exhibited two discrete structures (Figure 8a). The corresponding SEM elemental mapping (Figure 8c–g) indicated C enrichment in both structures, wherein that containing remarkably larger lamellar precipitates was also significantly enriched in Cr. In contrast, the structures composed of fibrous-like precipitates (Figure 8b) were depleted in Cr and enriched in Si. Moreover, the elemental maps of C and Ti clearly suggest the presence of TiC precipitates within this eutectic-like region. The above eutectic-like regions formed as a result of the last solidification stages in the Fe-C-Ti-Cr alloy system taking place under non-equilibrium conditions. It is reasonable to assume that the lamellar precipitates enriched in Cr were (Fe, Cr)3C phase. Quantitative analysis of the micrographs indicated an average volume fraction of (Fe, Cr)3C precipitates in the TRC of 2.1% ± 0.6%. (Fe, Cr)3C phase was not detected by the XRD due to the low fraction of this phase.
The typical eutectic-like structure formed during the last stages of solidification in TRM is presented in Figure 9. The fraction of these eutectic regions in the layer was estimated to be 1.9 ± 0.6 vol%. As in the case of (Fe, Cr)3C phase in TRC, the XRD did not detect the presence of these eutectic precipitates. However, considering the morphology of the above eutectic-like structure and the chemistry of the layer, one can assume that it contained mainly the cementite phase.
The metallographic data indicate that the addition of Cr significantly elevated the retained austenite fraction in the matrix material (Table 3). The fraction of retained austenite in the TRC was estimated to be 24 wt%, whereas the TRM had austenite fractions of about 5.7 wt%. The overall high retained austenite fraction in the TRC was directly attributed to the combined effect of non-equilibrium cooling conditions in the molten pool and enrichment of primary austenite grains in Cr, which inhibited the martensitic transformation. Based on the SEM/EDS analysis, the Cr content in the martensitic/austenitic matrix was approximately 2.4 wt%. The suppressed martensitic transformation in the laser-processed SALs on the DCI substrate by relatively low Cr additions has been reported in the previous work [36].
The TRC exhibited a non-uniform distribution of retained austenite throughout the layer because of the overlap reheating during multi-pass alloying (Figure 5a,b). Metallographic data suggest that, in the HAZ between consecutive beads in the TRC, a significant retained austenite fraction was converted to martensite due to reheating in this region. This is supported by the hardness distribution in the layer discussed in the next section. In turn, the microstructural characteristics of the TRM clearly show a Mo concentration of about 3.1 wt% in the molten pool during the LA, which Ti provides a completely martensitic matrix, as desired. Furthermore, minor microstructural changes in the overlap boundary (not a significantly elevated austenite fraction) indicates a notable improvement in the thermal stability of the TRM matrix compared with that of the TRC.
Note that in the case of the cubic MC carbide, Mo is a reactive element, i.e., Mo atoms can substitute for Ti atoms to form (Ti, Mo)C phase [37]. Thus, the addition of Mo into the melt provided an opportunity to change the composition of the synthesized cubic MC (TiC) carbide and led to the formation of primary and eutectic (Ti, Mo)C precipitates (Figure 10). It should be pointed out the SEM/EDS analysis detected negligible Mo content in the TRM matrix material. This indicates that the entire amount of Mo introduced into the molten pool dissolved in the TiC phase. Thus, considering the total concentration of MC carbide-forming elements in the melt (~10.5 wt% of Ti and ~3.1 wt% of Mo), it can be concluded that the TRM composition was optimal from a thermodynamics perspective, i.e., required to achieve the highest possible TiC fraction and a fully martensitic matrix [24,25]. Primary (Ti, Mo)C precipitates were observed in the compositional gradient between the core and outer layer (coring). The SEM/EDS elemental mapping, presented in Figure 10, suggests that the center of the primary dendritic (Ti, Mo)C precipitates was depleted in Mo, whereas the outer regions solidified with progressively higher Mo concentrations. A detailed characterization of the primary (Ti, Mo)C precipitates is presented elsewhere [38].
As expected, based on reported data [39,40], Cr addition did not affect the composition of the synthesized TiC precipitates. The EDS elemental mappings presented in Figure 11 indicted homogenous compositions of the TiC precipitates in TRC. Figure 11 also shows a distribution of the previously mentioned Cr-rich eutectic regions in the martensitic/austenitic matrix of TRC.
Quantitative metallography revealed that, despite the same fractions of primary TiC/(Ti, Mo)C precipitates, TRC exhibited a slightly lower mean free path (MFP) than TRM. The MFP of TRC and TRM were 15.1 ± 2.4 and 17.6 ± 3.4 µm respectively, which was directly attributed to differences in the morphology between dendritic precipitates of primary TiC and (Ti, Mo)C phase. It is well-established that the MFP of composites depends on both the fraction and morphology of the reinforcing particles [41,42]. Comparing the primary TiC precipitates in TRC (Figure 5, Figure 11a and Figure 12a) and (Ti, Mo)C in TRM (Figure 6, Figure 10a and Figure 12b) shows that the difference in the composition of the molten pool affected the growth morphology of the primary TiC/(Ti, Mo)C phase. The TiC precipitates in TRC have markedly thinner primary and secondary arms compared with (Ti, Mo)C in TRM. For comparative purposes, Figure 13 presents an SEM image taken of the TRL processed with pure Ti, which was non-uniformly alloyed, but the analyzed region contained approximately 12.5 wt% Ti (the same Ti content as in the TRC). This micrograph generally showed the same growth morphology of the primary TiC phase as (Ti, Mo)C, proving that Mo addition did not affect the morphology of the primary (Ti, Mo)C phase in the TRM. Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that Cr addition during the investigated LA process influenced the nucleation or growth mechanism of crystals of the primary TiC phase. It was reported in several works [43,44,45,46,47,48] that the growth morphology of TiC crystals during the melt reaction method strongly depends on the composition of the melt environment.

3.3. Hardness Analysis

Figure 14a,b shows typical hardness depth profiles of TRC and TRM, respectively. The corresponding hardness profiles across the overlap boundary in these layers are presented in Figure 14c,d. In general, due to the minor fraction of retained austenite, the TRM exhibited a higher overall hardness (610 ± 20 HV0.2) than the TRC (545 ± 25 HV0.2). Moreover, the Mo addition during the investigated LA process provided an almost homogeneous hardness distribution in the layer, even at the overlap boundary region (Figure 14d). The hardness uniformity of the TRM confirms that the addition of Mo produced a matrix material with high thermal stability. In the case of the TRC, as previously mentioned in the microstructure section, Cr addition leads to a relatively high fraction of retained austenite that, in turn, undergoes martensitic transformation in the HAZ of the overlap boundary, resulting in large hardness variations in the layer. The average hardness of the matrix in the TRM was estimated to be 580 ± 34 HV0.025. In the case of TRC, the matrix hardness ranged from 480 ± 32 to 550 ± 41 HV0.025 near the center of a single processed bead and in the HAZ of the overlap boundary, respectively.

4. Conclusions

This manuscript presented a novel approach to the in situ synthesis of TiC-reinforced composite surface layers on DCI substrates via LA that, by properly selecting the molten pool composition, changed the characteristics of TiC precipitates, the phase composition of the matrix material, and also the dispersion uniformity of TiC phase. In contrast to alloying with pure Ti, using 80Ti-20Cr and 80Ti-20Mo (weight ratio) powder mixtures produced the optimal TiC fraction from a thermodynamics perspective, i.e., the highest possible TiC fraction for the C content in the processed DCI [24]. As a result, the developed approach makes it possible to convert an as-cast structure into a composite structure containing TiC precipitates uniformly dispersed in the completely metallic matrix (eutectic cementite was limited to ~2 vol%). However, the presence of additional Cr in the molten pool, in conjunction with non-equilibrium cooling conditions, suppressed the martensitic transformation of the matrix material, leading to an undesired elevated amount of retained austenite (~24 wt%), and, consequently, a low matrix hardness. Additionally, the elevated retained austenite fraction in the matrix significantly changed the hardness in the overlap boundary in the SAL. In contrast, the addition of Mo to the melt led to the formation of an almost fully martensitic matrix (~5.7 wt% of retained austenite fraction), ensuring a uniform hardness distribution throughout the SAL.
It was found that the introduction of Mo into the molten pool led to the synthesis of primary and eutectic precipitates of (Ti, Mo)C phase. The primary (Ti, Mo)C precipitates exhibited a nonuniform Mo distribution (coring structure). The growth morphology of the primary (Ti, Mo)C precipitates was similar to that of TiC precipitates synthesized during processing using pure Ti. The presence of additional Cr in the molten pool did not affect the composition of the primary TiC phase. However, the melt enrichment of Cr (~3 wt%) refined the primary dendritic precipitates of TiC phase compared with that formed during alloying with a pure Ti and Ti-Mo powder mixture. As a result, at a constant fraction of TiC precipitates, the mean free path between the reinforcing precipitates was reduced.

Funding

Publication supported under the Rector’s grant in the area of research and development. The Silesian University of Technology, 10/050/RGP_20/0078.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

TRLTiC-reinforced composite surface layer
LALaser surface alloying
DCIDuctile cast iron
MMCMetal matrix composite
SMSubstrate material
SABSingle-alloyed bead
SALSurface alloyed layer (the layer produced via a multi-pass overlapping alloying process)
TRCSAL produced using a powder mixture of Ti-Cr
TRMSAL produced using a powder mixture of Ti-Mo
TRSAL produced using a pure Ti powder
HAZHeat-affected zone
MFPMean free path
BSEBack-Scattered Electron

References

  1. Paczkowska, M.; Makuch, N.; Kulka, M. The influence of various cooling rates during laser alloying on nodular iron surface layer. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018, 102, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jeyaprakash, N.; Yang, C.; Duraiselvam, M.; Prabu, G.; Tseng, S.; Kumar, D.R. Investigation of high temperature wear performance on laser processed nodular iron using optimization technique. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Janicki, D. Direct diode laser surface melting of nodular cast iron. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 809–810, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ceschini, L.; Campana, G.; Pagano, N.; Angelin, V. Effect of laser surface treatment on the dry sliding behaviour of the EN-GJS400-12 ductile cast iron. Tribol. Int. 2016, 104, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cui, W.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H.; Shi, Y. Investigation on wear resistance of nodular cast iron by laser surface treatment. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pagano, N.; Angelini, V.; Ceschini, L.; Campana, G. Laser remelting for enhancing tribological preferences of a ductile iron. Procedia CIRP 2016, 41, 987–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Janicki, D.; Górka, J.; Kwaśny, W.; Pakieła, W.; Matus, K. Influence of solidification conditions on the microstructure of laser-surface-melted ductile cast iron. Materials 2020, 13, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jeyaprakash, N.; Yang, C.; Duraiselvam, M.; Prabu, G. Microstructure and tribological evolution during laser alloying WC-12%Co and Cr3C2−25%NiCr powders on nodular iron surface. Results Phys. 2019, 12, 1610–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tański, T.; Pakieła, W.; Janicki, D.; Tomiczek, B.; Król, M. Properties of the aluminium alloy EN AC-51100 after laser surface treatment. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2016, 61, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lisiecki, A. Titanium matrix composite Ti/TiN produced by diode laser gas nitriding. Metals 2015, 5, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Szala, M.; Łatka, L.; Walczak, M.; Winnicki, M. Comparative study on the cavitation erosion and sliding wear of cold-sprayed Al/Al2O3 and Cu/Al2O3 coatings, and stainless steel, aluminium alloy, copper and brass. Metals 2020, 10, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rasool, G.; Mridha, S.; Stack, M.M. Mapping wear mechanisms of TiC/Ti composite coatings. Wear 2015, 328–329, 498–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Szala, M.; Hejwowski, T. Cavitation erosion resistance and wear mechanism model of flame-sprayed Al2O3-40% TiO2/NiMoAl cermet coatings. Coatings 2018, 8, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yan, H.; Wang, A.; Xiong, Z.; Xu, K.; Huang, Z. Microstructure and wear resistance of composite layers on a ductile iron with multicarbide by laser surface alloying. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 7001–7009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Man, H.C.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, F.T.; Yue, T.M. In situ synthesis of TiC reinforced surface MMC on Al6061 by laser surface alloying. Scr. Mater. 2002, 46, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, H.I.; Nakata, K.; Tomida, S. In situ formation of TiC particulate composite layer on cast iron by laser alloying of thermal sprayed titanium coating. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Janicki, D.; Górka, J.; Kwaśny, W.; Gołombek, K.; Kondracki, M.; Żuk, M. Diode laser surface alloying of armor steel with tungsten carbide. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2017, 62, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Aikin, R.M. The mechanical properties of in-situ composites. JOM 1997, 49, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Parashivamurthy, K.I.; Kumar, R.K.; Seetharamu, S.; Chandrasekharaiah, M.N. Review on TiC reinforced steel composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 36, 4519–4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Janicki, D. In-situ synthesis of titanium carbide particles in an iron matrix during diode-laser surface alloying of ductile cast iron. Mater. Technol. 2016, 51, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gilev, V.G.; Morozov, E.A. Laser melt injection of austenitic cast iron Ch16D7GKh with titanium. Russ. J. Non-Ferrous Met. 2016, 57, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y.; Qu, W.; Su, Y. TiC reinforcement composite coating produced using graphite of the cast iron by laser cladding. Materials 2016, 9, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Janicki, D. Microstructural evolution during laser surface alloying of ductile cast iron with titanium. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2017, 62, 2425–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Janicki, D. Microstructure and sliding wear behaviour of in-situ TiC-reinforced composite surface layers fabricated on ductile cast iron by laser alloying. Materials 2018, 11, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Janicki, D. Fabrication of TiC-reinforced surface layers on ductile cast iron substrate by laser surface alloying. Solid State Phenom. 2020, 308, 76–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ding, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhou, L.; Li, Y. Microstructure and properties of a titanium carbide reinforced coating on grey iron applied with laser cladding. Mater. Technol. 2019, 53, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dogan, O.N.; Hawk, J.A.; Tylczak, J.H.; Wilson, R.D.; Govier, R.D. Wear of titanium carbide reinforced metal matrix composite. Wear 1999, 225–229, 758–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Olejnik, E.; Szymański, Ł.; Kurtyka, P.; Tokarski, T.; Maziarz, W.; Grabowska, B.; Czapla, P. Locally reinforcement TiC-Fe type produced in situ in castings. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2016, 16, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhu, H.; Hua, B.; Huang, J.; Li, J.; Wang, G.; Xie, Z. Dry sliding wear behaviour of TiC/Fe composites fabricated by exothermic dispersion of Fe–Ti–C powders. Tribol. Mater. Surf. Interfaces 2014, 8, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Janicki, D. The Effect of Melt Composition on Microstructure of In-Situ Tic-Reinforced Fe-Based Composite Surface Layers Synthesized via a Laser Surface Alloying; Department of Welding, Silesian University of Technology: Gliwice, Poland, 2017; unpublished work. [Google Scholar]
  31. Barin, I. Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  32. Janicki, D. The effect of cooling rate on microstructure of in-situ TiC-reinforced Fe-based composite surface layers synthesized on the ductile cast iron via a laser surface alloying. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021. in preparation. [Google Scholar]
  33. Heiple, C.R.; Roper, J.R. Mechanism for minor element effect on GTA fusion zone geometry. Weld. J. 1982, 61, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
  34. Heiple, C.R.; Roper, J.R.; Stagner, R.T.; Aden, R.J. Surface active element effects on the shape of GTA, laser, and electron beam welds. Weld. J. 1983, 62, 72–77. [Google Scholar]
  35. Heiple, C.R.; Burgardt, P. Effects of SO2 shielding gas additions on GTA weld shape. Weld. J. 1985, 64, 159–162. [Google Scholar]
  36. Janicki, D. Fabrication of high chromium white iron surface layers on ductile cast iron substrate by laser surface alloying. Stroj. Vestn. 2017, 63, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jang, J.H.; Lee, C.H.; Heo, Y.U.; Suh, D.W. Stability of (Ti, M)C (M = Nb, V, Mo and W) carbide in steals using first-principle calculations. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Janicki, D. The friction and wear behaviour of in-situ titanium carbide reinforced composite layers manufactured on ductile cast iron by laser surface alloying. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 126634, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pierson, H.O. Handbook of Refractory Carbides and Nitrides: Properties Characteristic, Processing and Application; Noyes Publications: Westwood, NJ, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  40. Storms, E.K. The Refractory Carbides; Academic Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zum Ghar, K.-H. Microstructure and Wear of Materials; Tribology Series 10; Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  42. Thakare, M.R.; Wharton, J.A.; Wood, R.J.K.; Menger, C. Effect of abrasive particle size and the influence of microstructure on the wear mechanisms in wear-resistant materials. Wear 2012, 276–277, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Strzeciwilk, D.; Wokulski, Z.; Tkacz, P. Growth and TEM and HREM characterisation of TiC crystals grown from high-temperature solutions. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2003, 38, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nie, J.; Liu, X.; Ma, X. Influence of trace boron on the morphology of titanium carbide in an Al–Ti–C–B master alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 491, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Strzeciwilk, D.; Wokulski, Z.; Tkacz, P. Microstructure of TiC crystals obtained from high temperature nickel solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 350, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, Z.; Tian, J.; Li, B.; Zhao, L. Microstructure and mechanical behaviors of in situ TiC particulates reinforced Ni matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 527, 3898–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gopagoni, S.; Hwang, J.Y.; Singh, A.R.P.; Mensah, B.A.; Bunce, N.; Tiley, J.; Scharf, T.W.; Banerjee, R. Microstructural evolution in laser deposited nickel–titanium–carbon in situ metal matrix composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 1255–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nie, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, P.; Li, H.; Liu, X. Morphological evolution of TiC from octahedron to cube induced by elemental nickel. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 05750 g001 550
Figure 1. Optical macrographs of the SABs produced using a powder mixture of 80Ti-20Cr (weight ratio); SAB no. (Table 2): (a) TC1, (b) TC2, (c) TC3.
Figure 1. Optical macrographs of the SABs produced using a powder mixture of 80Ti-20Cr (weight ratio); SAB no. (Table 2): (a) TC1, (b) TC2, (c) TC3.
Materials 13 05750 g001
Materials 13 05750 g002 550
Figure 2. Optical macrographs of the SABs produced using a powder mixture of 80Ti-20Mo (weight ratio); SAB no. (Table 2): (a) TM1, (b) TM2, (c) TM3.
Figure 2. Optical macrographs of the SABs produced using a powder mixture of 80Ti-20Mo (weight ratio); SAB no. (Table 2): (a) TM1, (b) TM2, (c) TM3.
Materials 13 05750 g002
Materials 13 05750 g003 550
Figure 3. Low-magnification BSE SEM micrographs taken at the mid-section of SAB no. (a) T2, (b) TC3, (c) TM3 (Table 2).
Figure 3. Low-magnification BSE SEM micrographs taken at the mid-section of SAB no. (a) T2, (b) TC3, (c) TM3 (Table 2).
Materials 13 05750 g003
Materials 13 05750 g004 550
Figure 4. Optical macrographs of (a) TRC and (b) TRM (Table 3).
Figure 4. Optical macrographs of (a) TRC and (b) TRM (Table 3).
Materials 13 05750 g004
Materials 13 05750 g005 550
Figure 5. BSE SEM images showing the microstructure of TRC (Table 3): (a) mid-section of the layer, (b) the overlap boundary of the layer, (c) a detail from (a) showing the primary (P) and eutectic (E) TiC precipitates, and (d) a detail from (a) showing the distribution of eutectic-like structures formed during the last stages of solidification (c).
Figure 5. BSE SEM images showing the microstructure of TRC (Table 3): (a) mid-section of the layer, (b) the overlap boundary of the layer, (c) a detail from (a) showing the primary (P) and eutectic (E) TiC precipitates, and (d) a detail from (a) showing the distribution of eutectic-like structures formed during the last stages of solidification (c).
Materials 13 05750 g005
Materials 13 05750 g006 550
Figure 6. BSE SEM images showing the microstructure of the TRM (Table 3): (a) mid-section of the layer, (b) a detail from (a) showing typical morphology of primary TiC precipitates, (c) a detail from (a) showing a distribution of primary (P) and eutectic (E) TiC precipitates, and (d) image taken from the overlap boundary of the layer.
Figure 6. BSE SEM images showing the microstructure of the TRM (Table 3): (a) mid-section of the layer, (b) a detail from (a) showing typical morphology of primary TiC precipitates, (c) a detail from (a) showing a distribution of primary (P) and eutectic (E) TiC precipitates, and (d) image taken from the overlap boundary of the layer.
Materials 13 05750 g006
Materials 13 05750 g007 550
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) TRC and (b) TRM (Table 3).
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) TRC and (b) TRM (Table 3).
Materials 13 05750 g007
Materials 13 05750 g008a 550Materials 13 05750 g008b 550
Figure 8. (a,b) SEM micrographs taken from the mid-section of the TRC (Table 3) showing eutectic-like structures due to the last solidification stages, (b) detail from (a), and (c–g) EDS maps of C, Si, Ti, Cr, and Fe distributions respectively, from (a).
Figure 8. (a,b) SEM micrographs taken from the mid-section of the TRC (Table 3) showing eutectic-like structures due to the last solidification stages, (b) detail from (a), and (c–g) EDS maps of C, Si, Ti, Cr, and Fe distributions respectively, from (a).
Materials 13 05750 g008aMaterials 13 05750 g008b
Materials 13 05750 g009 550
Figure 9. In-lens SEM micrograph taken from the mid-section of the TRM (Table 3) showing the eutectic-like structures (C) as a result of the last solidification stages.
Figure 9. In-lens SEM micrograph taken from the mid-section of the TRM (Table 3) showing the eutectic-like structures (C) as a result of the last solidification stages.
Materials 13 05750 g009
Materials 13 05750 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) BSE SEM micrograph taken from the mid-section of the TRM (Table 3), showing the primary (Ti, Mo)C precipitates in dendritic form and eutectic plate-like (Ti, Mo) C precipitates, and (b–d) corresponding distribution maps of C, Ti, and Mo, respectively.
Figure 10. (a) BSE SEM micrograph taken from the mid-section of the TRM (Table 3), showing the primary (Ti, Mo)C precipitates in dendritic form and eutectic plate-like (Ti, Mo) C precipitates, and (b–d) corresponding distribution maps of C, Ti, and Mo, respectively.
Materials 13 05750 g010
Materials 13 05750 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) BSE SEM micrograph taken from the mid-section of TRC (Table 3) showing the primary TiC precipitates in dendritic form and eutectic plate-like TiC precipitates, and (b–d) corresponding maps of C, Ti, and Cr distribution, respectively.
Figure 11. (a) BSE SEM micrograph taken from the mid-section of TRC (Table 3) showing the primary TiC precipitates in dendritic form and eutectic plate-like TiC precipitates, and (b–d) corresponding maps of C, Ti, and Cr distribution, respectively.
Materials 13 05750 g011
Materials 13 05750 g012 550
Figure 12. SEM micrographs of deep-etched (a) TRC and (b) TRM showing primary dendritic precipitates of TiC and (Ti, Mo)C phases, respectively (Table 3).
Figure 12. SEM micrographs of deep-etched (a) TRC and (b) TRM showing primary dendritic precipitates of TiC and (Ti, Mo)C phases, respectively (Table 3).
Materials 13 05750 g012
Materials 13 05750 g013 550
Figure 13. BSE SEM micrograph taken from the TRL region processed with pure Ti containing approximately 12.5 wt% Ti.
Figure 13. BSE SEM micrograph taken from the TRL region processed with pure Ti containing approximately 12.5 wt% Ti.
Materials 13 05750 g013
Materials 13 05750 g014 550
Figure 14. (a,b) Hardness depth profiles for TRC and TRM (Table 3), respectively. (c,d) Hardness profiles across the overlap boundary between consecutive beads in TRC and TRM, respectively. (e) Diagram showing a location of the measurement line in the overlap boundary.
Figure 14. (a,b) Hardness depth profiles for TRC and TRM (Table 3), respectively. (c,d) Hardness profiles across the overlap boundary between consecutive beads in TRC and TRM, respectively. (e) Diagram showing a location of the measurement line in the overlap boundary.
Materials 13 05750 g014
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of the used ductile cast iron (DCI) grade EN-GJS-700-2 (wt%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the used ductile cast iron (DCI) grade EN-GJS-700-2 (wt%).
CSiCuMnCrNiTiMoSPFe
3.602.510.780.250.020.040.020.020.0050.016balance
Table
Table 2. Effect of the chemical composition of the alloying material and powder feed rate on the fusion area of the single-alloyed beads (SAB) and the concentration of alloying elements in the bead.
Table 2. Effect of the chemical composition of the alloying material and powder feed rate on the fusion area of the single-alloyed beads (SAB) and the concentration of alloying elements in the bead.
Processing Condition No./SAB No.Alloying MaterialPowder Feed Rate 2 (mg/mm)Fusion Area of the SAB (mm2)Average Ti Content, (wt%)Average Cr Content, (wt%)Average Mo Content, (wt%)Quality 3
T1Ti8.07.34 ± 0.617.0 ± 0.8−−U
T210.07.05 ± 0.588.8 ± 1.1−−U
T311.06.80 ± 0.50−−−N
TC1Ti-Cr 19.07.73 ± 0.638.4 ± 0.291.6 ± 0.11−U
TC211.07.89 ± 0.6510.3 ± 0.381.9 ± 0.15−U
TC312.08.50 ± 0.6711.6 ± 0.582.3 ± 0.24−U
TC413.08.42 ± 0.71−−−N
TM1Ti-Mo 110.08.20 ± 0.637.0 ± 0.38−1.8 ± 0.16U
TM212.58.09 ± 0.628.4 ± 0.46−2.3 ± 0.23U
TM313.58.10 ± 0.649.9 ± 0.69−2.8 ± 0.32U
TM414.08.07 ± 0.69−−−N
1 Powder mixtures prepared with a weight ratio of 80–20; 2 defined as the amount of the powder provided per unit length of the SAB; 3 assessed in terms of the compositional uniformity (Ti concentration): U—uniform, N—non-uniform.
Table
Table 3. Effect of the chemical composition of the alloying material on the microstructural parameters of the surface alloyed layers (SALs).
Table 3. Effect of the chemical composition of the alloying material on the microstructural parameters of the surface alloyed layers (SALs).
TRL No.Processing Condition No. (Table 2) 1α-Fe (Martensite) Fraction (wt%) 2Retained Austenite Fraction (wt%) 2Cementite Fraction (vol%)TiC Fraction (vol%)
TRT266.4 ± 1.115.3 ± 1.48.1 ± 2.915.4 ± 2.1
TRCTC352.9 ± 1.623.7 ± 1.22.1 ± 0.620.8 ± 1.1
TRMTM369.1 ± 1.45.7 ± 1.41.9 ± 0.621.1 ± 1.3
1 Overlap ratio: 30%; 2 based on the Rietveld refinement of X-ray diffraction (XRD) data.
Table
Table 4. Chemical compositions of the SALs.
Table 4. Chemical compositions of the SALs.
TRL No.Element (wt%)
CTiCrMoMnSiCuSPFe
TR3.159.50.050.020.131.990.790.1480.023balance
TRC3.1012.42.870.040.131.900.810.1810.025balance
TRM3.0710.50.063.150.141.850.760.1770.023balance
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Janicki, D. Effect of Chromium and Molybdenum Addition on the Microstructure of In Situ TiC-Reinforced Composite Surface Layers Fabricated on Ductile Cast Iron by Laser Alloying. Materials 2020, 13, 5750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245750

AMA Style

Janicki D. Effect of Chromium and Molybdenum Addition on the Microstructure of In Situ TiC-Reinforced Composite Surface Layers Fabricated on Ductile Cast Iron by Laser Alloying. Materials. 2020; 13(24):5750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245750

Chicago/Turabian Style

Janicki, Damian. 2020. "Effect of Chromium and Molybdenum Addition on the Microstructure of In Situ TiC-Reinforced Composite Surface Layers Fabricated on Ductile Cast Iron by Laser Alloying" Materials 13, no. 24: 5750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245750

APA Style

Janicki, D. (2020). Effect of Chromium and Molybdenum Addition on the Microstructure of In Situ TiC-Reinforced Composite Surface Layers Fabricated on Ductile Cast Iron by Laser Alloying. Materials, 13(24), 5750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245750

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop