Next Article in Journal
Seismic Behavior of Steel Column Base with Slip-Friction Connections
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Test Setups for the Experimental Evaluation of the Primary Fixation Stability of Acetabular Cups
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Approach to the Fabrication of Memristive Neuromorphic Devices: Compositionally Graded Films
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 18
10.3390/ma13183984
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Based on LiNbO3 Thin Films

by
Zakhar Vakulov
1,*,
Andrey Geldash
2,
Daniil Khakhulin
3,
Marina V. Il’ina
4,
Oleg I. Il’in
3,
Viktor S. Klimin
4,
Vladimir N. Dzhuplin
2,
Boris G. Konoplev
4,
Zhubing He
5 and
Oleg A. Ageev
2
1
Federal Research Centre ‘The Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ (SSC RAS), 344006 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
2
Research and Education Centre ‘Nanotechnologies’, Southern Federal University, 347922 Taganrog, Russia
3
Laboratory of Functional Nanomaterials Technology, Southern Federal University, 347922 Taganrog, Russia
4
Institute of Nanotechnologies, Electronics, and Equipment Engineering, Southern Federal University, 347922 Taganrog, Russia
5
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Full Spectral Solar Electricity Generation (FSSEG), Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(18), 3984; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183984
Submission received: 19 August 2020 / Revised: 4 September 2020 / Accepted: 7 September 2020 / Published: 9 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electronic Materials and Devices)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper reports the results of the influence of the energy of laser pulses during laser ablation on the morphology and electro-physical properties of LiNbO3 nanocrystalline films. It is found that increasing laser pulse energy from 180 to 220 mJ results in the concentration of charge carriers in LiNbO3 films decreasing from 8.6 × 1015 to 1.0 × 1013 cm−3, with the mobility of charge carriers increasing from 0.43 to 17.4 cm2/(V·s). In addition, experimental studies of sublayer material effects on the geometric parameters of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are performed. It is found that the material of the lower electrode has a significant effect on the formation of CNTs. CNTs obtained at the same growth time on a sample with a Cr sublayer have a smaller diameter and a longer length compared to samples with a V sublayer. Based on the obtained results, the architecture of the energy nanogenerator is proposed. The current generated by the nanogenerator is 18 nA under mechanical stress of 600 nN. The obtained piezoelectric nanogenerator parameters are used to estimate the parameters of the hybrid-carbon-nanostructures-based piezoelectric energy converter. Obtained results are promising for the development of efficient energy converters for alternative energy devices based on lead-free ferroelectric films.

1. Introduction

Despite a significant improvement in the performance of computing system components, essential progress in the fabrication of high-efficiency batteries has not yet been achieved [1]. The increase in performance has led to an increase in power consumption, which leads to a reduction in battery life, significantly limits the functionality of modern electronic devices, and increases the weight and size parameters of the power supply elements [2]. In addition, battery life is limited compared to the duty cycle of the device. Replacing or recharging batteries is often ineffective and sometimes impossible. Therefore, the collection and conversion of environmental energy into electric energy is considered today as an alternative to electrochemical batteries and can be used as an autonomous energy source for portable devices and wireless sensors [3,4,5,6]. Advances in wireless technology and MEMS have made it possible to use power converters as an alternative to conventional electrochemical batteries, which are already used as power sources for portable electronics [7].
Today, there are several possible ways to obtain electrical energy from environmental energy: the use of solar energy [8], electromagnetic induction [9], electrostatic generation [10], dielectric elastomers [11], and piezoelectric materials [12]. Each of the methods can power devices with a small amount of energy. However, the complex systems based on piezoelectric materials have become attractive due to their ability to convert mechanical energy (deformation energy) into useful electrical power [13,14,15].
Energy conversion in a piezoelectric material is possible due to the existence of a local charge separation called an electric dipole [16]. When mechanical stress is applied to a piezoelectric material, a dipole deforms to generate an electric charge that can be used to supply various portable electronic devices [17,18]. This effect is used in sensing elements based on piezoelectric materials in accelerometers, microphones, strain gauges, etc. The same approach is used to generate electricity, but instead of dissipating energy, it is used to power a device.
The process of collecting energy from the environment and converting it into electrical power is called energy harvesting [19,20]. The conversion efficiency depends not only on the piezoelectric coefficients but also on the applied mechanical stress (deformation). The magnitude of the generated electric power also depends on the elastic and fracture properties of the piezoelectric material, which determine the ability to withstand deformations. The efficiency of piezoelectric energy converters can be increased by modifying the properties of the active layer, the topology of the contact system, direction of polarization, geometric parameters of the active layer, and creating additional mechanical stresses to improve adhesion and increase deformation [17]. In addition, extra attention is paid to the multi-component ferroelectric oxides and carbon nanostructures., To increase the area of energy harvesting, experimental studies were carried out to create a “skeleton” based on carbon nanotubes (CNTs), which was covered with LiNbO3. The use of vertically oriented CNTs makes it possible to increase the effective coverage area of LiNbO3 due to the greater development of the CNT surface as compared to the formation of a piezoelectric layer on a flat substrate. The parameters and geometries of CNTs can be varied by the tuning of CNTs growth regimes and by using different contact materials. The use of hybrid structures leads to withstanding significant deformation gradients, thereby increasing the conversion efficiency. Moreover, the area of the possible application of energy harvesters can be significantly expanded by using lead-free piezoelectric materials [21]. Lithium niobate (LiNbO3) is one of the prospective materials for piezoelectric energy harvesters because it has a high Curie temperature and does not contain lead [22]. One of the key tasks in the formation of thin multicomponent oxide films is the control of the processes that affect the preservation of the stoichiometric composition, as it determines the structural and electro-physical properties of the formed films [23].
Currently, LiNbO3 thin films can be obtained by following technological methods compatible with modern integrated technologies of micro- and nanoelectronics: epitaxy [24], chemical vapor deposition [25], Radio Frequencysputtering [26], pulsed laser deposition [27,28,29,30], and the sol–gel process [31].
Pulsed laser deposition (PLD) is mostly used for the growth of complex oxides [32,33,34,35] and when a particular threshold value of the laser power density is exceeded, stoichiometric growth of films is possible [36]. However, the physical mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have not yet been clarified [37]. Thus, the purpose of this work was to experimentally study the influence of laser pulse energy under the deposition of LiNbO3 films by PLD on their morphology and electro-physical parameters, and to evaluate the possibility of using the obtained films in piezoelectric converters based on hybrid nanostructures.

2. Materials and Methods

For LiNbO3 film formation by PLD (Figure 1), the nanotechnological cluster complex NANOFAB NTK-9 (NT-MDT, Zelenograd, Russia), with the Pioneer 180 PLD module (Neocera Co., Beltsville, MD, USA) was used. The LiNbO3 congruent target (Kurt J. Lasker, 99.9% purity) was ablated by excimer KrF laser (λ = 248 nm) (Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a pulse length of 20 ns. The laser pulse energy was varied in the range from 180 to 220 mJ in this case, while the target–substrate distance (80 mm), the number of pulses (50,000), the repetition rate (10 Hz), and the background oxygen pressure in the growth chamber (1 × 10−2 Torr) remained unchanged. LiNbO3 films with a thickness of 132.3 ± 8.8 nm–153.9 ± 10.5 nm were obtained at a temperature of 600 °C on single-crystal silicon substrates.
The formation of catalytic centers and the growth of carbon nanotubes (CNT) were carried out in the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) module (NT-MDT, Zelenograd, Russia), designed for the catalytic plasma-chemical deposition of arrays of carbon nanotubes on flat plates. The deposition of CNTs took place in a plasma obtained at low pressure by means of a direct current electric discharge only on previously prepared catalytic structures with a structure suitable for CNT synthesis. Previously [38,39], we carried out the necessary studies of the growth modes of CNTs by PECVD, which made it possible to determine the optimal technological parameters of their growth. CNTs were grown on Si (100) samples coated with contact V or Cr (50 nm) and catalytic Ni layers (10 nm). The deposition was carried out in a flow of ammonia (210 sccm) and acetylene (70 sccm) at a pressure of 4.5 Torr. During the growth process, a plasma with a power of 2 W was initiated employing an electric discharge with a direct current of 5 mA at a voltage of 420 V. The gap between the electrodes was 10 mm. The range of growth times was from 1 to 10 min.
The morphology of the obtained films was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) in semi-contact mode using a Nova Nanolab 600 scanning electron microscope (FEI. Co., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and the Ntegra probe nanolaboratory (NT-MDT, Zelenograd, Russia), respectively [23]. The crystal structure of the obtained LiNbO3 films was studied by the X-ray diffraction (XRD) method using a Rigaku MiniFlex 600 (Rigaku Co., Tokyo, Japan). The charge carrier concentration and mobility were measured using the Hall effect technique by an Ecopia HMS-3000 measurement system (Ecopia Co., Anyang, Korea) [28].

3. Results

3.1. LiNbO3 Thin Film Growth

Figure 2 shows the dependence of film thickness of the obtained LiNbO3 on laser pulse energy.
Our results indicate that with an increase in the laser pulse energy from 180 to 220 mJ, the thickness of the LiNbO3 films increased from 132.3 ± 8.8 nm (the deposition rate of the film was 1.47 nm/min) to 153.9 ± 10.5 nm (film deposition rate 1.71 nm/min).
Figure 3 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of films obtained at laser pulse energies of 180 and 220 mJ.
We can conclude that the obtained films predominantly consist of LiNbO3—the double peak at about 69° refers to phases (018) and (214), and the higher peak intensity in the 220 mJ sample indicates a greater film thickness obtained at a laser pulse energy of 220 mJ. The 220 mJ X-ray diffraction pattern also shows the presence of a peak corresponding to phase (211). Thus, the additional energy of the laser beam changes the mobility of ablated particles, intensifies the growth process, and leads to the formation of a thicker film with higher crystallinity. In addition, an increased number of collisions at higher energy also stimulates variation in the growth direction [37] as it is indicated by the appearance of the (211) peak. The spectra of the films are shifted to the right by ~5° relative to the spectra presented in [40,41,42]. Such a shift can be explained by stress applied to LiNbO3 films by Si substrates. Figure 4 shows AFM images of LiNbO3 films obtained at different laser pulse energies.
An increase in the grain size can be related to an increase in the kinetic energy of the ablated particles and the intensification of coalescence processes (Figure 5) [37]. A further increase in the energy of laser pulses above 200 mJ leads to the formation of smaller ablated particles, which results in the formation of a fine-grained film (Figure 6).
Increasing the laser pulse energy from 180 to 220 mJ results in a decrease of charge carrier concentration from 8.6 × 1015 to 1.0 × 1013 cm−3. The mobility of charge carriers increases from 0.43 up to 17.4 cm2/(V∙s), which can be associated with an increase in stoichiometry during heat and mass transfer in the transit space and a decrease in the defectiveness of films [43]. This indicates a transition from the evaporation mode to ablation (Figure 7). The structural changes of fabricated films deposited at different laser pulse energies can be attributed to the diffusion character of incident particles on the substrate [39,44].
Figure 8 shows the dependencies of the polarization of the fabricated LiNbO3 films on the electric field strength.
The dependencies of polarization on the field strength exhibit hysteresis, which characterizes these films as ferroelectric with spontaneous polarization.

3.2. CNT Growth

In addition, experimental studies of the sublayer material effect on the geometric parameters of CNTs were performed. Ni(10 nm)/V(20 nm)/Si and Ni(10 nm)/Cr(20 nm)/Si were chosen.
Figure 9 shows SEM images of the obtained CNT arrays on the Ni/V/Si and Ni/Cr/Si structures.
Based on the obtained results, the influence of sublayer material (lower electrode) was established. The dependencies of the heights of CNTs on the growth times for various sublayer materials are shown in Figure 10.
It was found that the material of the lower electrode had a significant effect on the formation of CNTs. CNTs obtained at the same growth time on a sample with a Cr sublayer had a smaller diameter and a longer length compared to samples with a V sublayer. According to the results of experiments, an array of carbon nanotubes with the following parameters with a vertical orientation of 40–70 nm in diameter, and heights of 4.5–5 μm, was obtained. The density of the tubes in the array was around 3.68 × 105 cm−2.

3.3. Piezoelectric Energy Harvester

Based on the obtained results, the architecture of the piezoelectric nanogenerator based on a hybrid carbon nanostructure was developed. As an active element it uses a CNT coated with a LiNbO3 film with ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties. Figure 11 shows a schematic representation of the developed nanogenerator.
The generated current were measurement measured by the force mode of the Ntegra probe nanolaboratory when the mechanical force were applied (Figure 11) [45]. The Si/Ti hybrid carbon nanostructure was used for measurements. An NSG11/Pt conducting AFM cantilever probe was used as the upper electrode. The pressing force of the NSG11/Pt AFM cantilever probe changed from 0 to 600 nN. The deformation of the structure was formed under the action of an AFM probe during force spectroscopy.
The current value was reproducibly reduced to zero (Figure 12), with the removal of the mechanical impact.
The piezoelectric effect creates an electric field within the structure: a stretched part with positive strain creates a positive electrical potential, while a compressed part with negative strain creates a negative electrical potential. This effect is associated with the relative displacement of cations relative to anions. As a result, a potential difference is created at the top of the nanostructure and distributed over the surface of the structure. However, the base of the nanostructure remains electrically neutral.
Figure 13 shows the results of studying the stability of the output parameters under multiple deforming cycles.
It was found that the hybrid-carbon-nanostructure-based nanogenerator generated a current of about 18 nA when mechanical stress of 600 nN was applied. In addition, under the influence of multiple deforming cycles, the nanogenerator retained its ability to generate current, despite the gradual degradation of its parameters that began after cycle 218. One of the possible ways to increase the stability of the nanogenerator parameters is the use of a polymeric material such as dimethicone (PDMS) as a flexible filler, which would perform a protective function without violating the elastic properties.
To test the integral effects associated with an increase in the generated energy with an increase in the number of hybrid carbon structures in the array, COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2 software (COMSOL Inc., Los Altos, CA, USA) was used. The established COMSOL model was based on the piezoelectricity, solid mechanics, electrostatics, and electric circuit modules. As a boundary condition, it was assumed that the bottom facet of the hybrid nanostructures was mechanically fixed and electrostatically neutral. In the same manner as in the experimental study, mechanical stress was applied from the side of the nanostructure array. We performed the estimated calculations of the parameters of the proposed structure and obtained the distribution of the electric potential in the piezoelectric transducer, which consisted of 100 hybrid carbon nanostructures. Figure 14 shows the calculated electrical potential distribution at mechanical stress of 1 N.
The generated voltage of the proposed piezoelectric transducer based on hybrid carbon nanostructures was at the level of modern transducers presented in the literature [46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. The active layers based on the hybrid carbon nanostructures make it possible to increase the generated voltage by a factor of 10 in comparison with a LiNbO3-based converter [52]. In addition, the absence of lead in the composition of the converter allows implementation of biocompatible energy harvesters on the same basis, which makes it possible to significantly expand the areas of their potential application, including for use as part of wearable electronic devices, medical equipment, and potential integration into clothes. The correctness of the model was verified by comparing the calculation results with the experimentally investigated characteristics of the nanogenerator. It was found that the calculated voltage peak generated by the piezoelectric structure was 3.5 V, which agrees with the experimental results.

4. Conclusions

Experimental studies of the parameters of lithium niobate films formed by PLD have shown that the laser pulse energy has an essential effect on the structure and properties of the films. The experiments have shown that films obtained in the range of laser pulse energies from 180 to 220 mJ exhibit ferroelectric properties. It was found that increasing laser pulse energy from 180 to 220 mJ resulted in decreasing charge carrier concentration of LiNbO3 films from 8.6 × 1015 to 1.0 × 1013 cm−3, while the mobility of charge carriers increased from 0.43 up to 17.4 cm2/(V∙s).
Based on the results obtained, the structure of the nanogenerator has been proposed. The proposed generator creates a current of 18 nA at mechanical stress of 600 nN. The conducted studies of the stability of the parameters of the hybrid-carbon-nanostructure-based nanogenerator have shown that the nanogenerator retains the ability to generate current despite the gradual degradation of its properties that significantly appears after 218 cycles. Based on the modeling it was found that an array of 100 nanostructures can generate a voltage of about 3.5 V.
The influence of laser pulse energy during PLD has been experimentally studied, which allowed LiNbO3 films with controlled parameters to be obtained. The obtained theoretical and experimental results enable fabrication of LiNbO3 films that can be used as a key element of the promising lead-free energy converters for “green” energy and IoT devices.

Author Contributions

D.K. and A.G. carried out the substrate preparation for LiNbO3 film growth. Z.V. carried out the growth of LiNbO3 thin films and characterization. O.I.I. and V.S.K. carried out the growth of CNT arrays. D.K. performed the XRD study and data analysis. M.V.I. did the piezoresponse analysis. Z.V., M.V.I., and O.A.A. developed the architecture of a piezoelectric nanogenerator. O.A.A., B.G.K., Z.H., and V.N.D. provided key suggestions on the experiments and analysis of obtained results, and coordination. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript, which was coordinated by O.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. [19-38-60052] (Experimental study of LiNbO3 growth by PLD and piezoelectric nanogenerator architecture development). A polarization study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, within the framework of project No. [19-37-90139]. Experimental studies on the growth of an array of carbon nanotubes and study of the piezoelectric response by the AFM method were carried out with the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the framework of a state task in the field of scientific activity No. [0852-2020-0015].

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Daniel Vakulov for valuable suggestions that essentially improved the manuscript. We would also like to thank Jong-Gul Yoon (Suwon University, Korea) for providing access to XRD facilities. The work was done on the equipment of the Research and Education Centre “Nanotechnology”, Southern Federal University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Niroomand, M.; Foroughi, H.R. A rotary electromagnetic microgenerator for energy harvesting from human motions. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2016, 14, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Waldrop, M.M. The chips are down for Moore’s law. Nat. News 2016, 530, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chavez, R.; Vakulov, D.; Gazibegovic, S.; Car, D.; Kendig, D.; Tay, A.A.O.; Shakouri, A.; Bakkers, E.P.A.M. Thermopower characterization of InSb nanowires using thermoreflectance. In Proceedings of the 2017 23rd International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27–29 September 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shaikh, F.K.; Zeadally, S. Energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 1041–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zeadally, S.; Shaikh, F.K.; Talpur, A.; Sheng, Q.Z. Design architectures for energy harvesting in the Internet of Things. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 128, 109901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Orrego, S.; Shoele, K.; Ruas, A.; Doran, K.; Caggiano, B.; Mittal, R.; Kang, S.H. Harvesting ambient wind energy with an inverted piezoelectric flag. Appl. Energy 2017, 194, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wei, C.; Jing, X. A comprehensive review on vibration energy harvesting: Modelling and realization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 74, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chai, Z.; Zhang, N.; Sun, P.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Fan, H.J.; Fan, X.; Mai, W. Tailorable and wearable textile devices for solar energy harvesting and simultaneous storage. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 9201–9207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Glynne-Jones, P.; Tudor, M.J.; Beeby, S.P.; White, N.M. An electromagnetic, vibration-powered generator for intelligent sensor systems. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2004, 110, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mitcheson, P.D.; Miao, P.; Stark, B.H.; Yeatman, E.M.; Holmes, A.S.; Green, T.C. MEMS electrostatic micropower generator for low frequency operation. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2004, 115, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wang, N.; Cui, C.; Guo, H.; Chen, B.; Zhang, X. Advances in dielectric elastomer actuation technology. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2018, 61, 1512–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Zu, J.; Inman, D. High-performance piezoelectric energy harvesters and their applications. Joule 2018, 2, 642–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kang, M.G.; Jung, W.S.; Kang, C.Y.; Yoon, S.J. Recent progress on PZT based piezoelectric energy harvesting technologies. Actuators 2016, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, Z.; Erturk, A.; Zu, J. On the efficiency of piezoelectric energy harvesters. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 2017, 15, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Turkmen, A.C.; Celik, C. Energy harvesting with the piezoelectric material integrated shoe. Energy (Oxford) 2018, 150, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maiti, S.; Karan, S.K.; Kim, J.K.; Khatua, B.B. Nature driven bio-piezoelectric/triboelectric nanogenerator as next-generation green energy harvester for smart and pollution free society. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bowen, C.R.; Kim, H.A.; Weaver, P.M.; Dunn, S. Piezoelectric and ferroelectric materials and structures for energy harvesting applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lesieutre, G.A. Vibration damping and control using shunted piezoelectric materials. Shock. Vib. 1998, 30, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Narita, F.; Fox, M. A review on piezoelectric, magnetostrictive, and magnetoelectric materials and device technologies for energy harvesting applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20, 1700743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Khan, A.; Abas, Z.; Kim, H.S.; Oh, I.K. Piezoelectric thin films: An integrated review of transducers and energy harvesting. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 053002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, A.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, R.; Vaish, R.; Chauhan, V.S. Finite element analysis of vibration energy harvesting using lead-free piezoelectric materials: A comparative study. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2014, 2, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bedekar, V.; Oliver, J.; Zhang, S.; Priya, S. Comparative study of energy harvesting from high temperature piezoelectric single crystals. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 48, 091406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ageev, O.; Konoplev, B. (Eds.) Nanotechnology in Microelectronics; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 2019; p. 511. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tellekamp, M.B.; Shank, J.C.; Goorsky, M.S.; Doolittle, W.A. Molecular beam epitaxy growth of high crystalline quality LiNbO3. J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 45, 6292–6299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Morosanu, C.E. Thin Films by Chemical Vapour Deposition, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990; p. 719. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sauze, L.C.; Vaxelaire, N.; Rouchon, D.; Pierre, F.; Templier, R.; Remiens, D.; Rodriguez, G. Microstructural and chemical analysis of polycrystalline LiNbO3 films obtained by room-temperature RF sputtering after various annealing durations. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2020, 38, 043205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, W.; Cui, J.; Wang, W.; Zheng, D.; Jia, L.; Saeed, S.; Liu, H.; Rupp, R.; Kong, Y.; Xu, J. P-type lithium niobate thin films fabricated by nitrogen-doping. Materials 2019, 12, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Vakulov, Z.; Zamburg, E.; Khakhulin, D.; Geldash, A.; Golosov, D.A.; Zavadski, S.M.; Miakonkikh, A.V.; Rudenko, K.V.; Dostanko, A.P.; He, Z.; et al. Oxygen pressure influence on properties of nanocrystalline LiNbO3 films grown by laser ablation. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nakata, Y.; Gunji, S.; Okada, T.; Maeda, M. Fabrication of LiNbO3 thin films by pulsed laser deposition and investigation of nonlinear properties. Appl. Phys. A 2004, 79, 1279–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vakulov, Z.E.; Zamburg, E.G.; Golosov, D.A.; Zavadskiy, S.M.; Miakonkikh, A.V.; Clemente, I.E.; Rudenko, K.V.; Dostanko, A.P.; Ageev, O.A. Effect of substrate temperature on the properties of LiNbO3 nanocrystalline films during pulsed laser deposition. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2017, 81, 1476–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Takahashi, M.; Yamauchi, K.; Yagi, T.; Nishiwaki, A.; Wakita, K.; Ohnishi, N.; Hotta, K.; Sahashi, I. Preparation and characterization of high-quality stoichiometric LiNbO3 thick films prepared by the sol-gel method. Thin Solid Film. 2004, 458, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tominov, R.V.; Vakulov, Z.E.; Avilov, V.I.; Khakhulin, D.A.; Fedotov, A.A.; Zamburg, E.G.; Smirnov, V.A.; Ageev, O.A. Synthesis and memristor effect of a forming-free ZnO nanocrystalline films. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vakulov, Z.E.; Varzarev, Y.N.; Gusev, E.Y.; Skrylev, A.V.; Panich, A.E.; Miakonkikh, A.V.; Klemente, I.E.; Rudenko, K.V.; Konoplev, B.G.; Ageev, O.A. Influence of pulsed laser deposition modes on properties of nanocrystalline LiNbO3 films. Russ. Microelectron. 2019, 48, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vakulov, Z.E.; Klimin, V.S.; Rezvan, A.A.; Tominov, R.V.; Korzun, K.; Kots, I.N.; Polyakova, V.V.; Ageev, O.A. Formation of SiO2 buffer layer for LiNbO3 thin films growth. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1410, 012042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vakulov, Z.; Ivonin, M.; Zamburg, E.G.; Klimin, V.S.; Volik, D.P.; Golosov, D.A.; Zavadskiy, S.M.; Dostanko, A.P.; Miakonkikh, A.V.; Clemente, I.E.; et al. Size effects in LiNbO3 thin films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1124, 022032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wicklein, S.; Sambri, A.; Amoruso, S.; Wang, X.; Bruzzese, R.; Koehl, A.; Dittmann, R. Pulsed laser ablation of complex oxides: The role of congruent ablation and preferential scattering for the film stoichiometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 131601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. He, H.; Xiao, M.; Zhong, Q.; Fu, Y.C.; Shen, X.M.; Zeng, J.M. Influence of laser pulse energy on the microstructure and optical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 films by one-step pulsed laser deposition. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 13263–13267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Il’in, O.I.; Il’ina, M.V.; Rudyk, N.N.; Fedotov, A.A.; Ageev, O.A. Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes Production by PECVD. In Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes, 1st ed.; El-Din, S.H., Moawad, M.E.-S.S., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  39. Il’in, O.I.; Rudyk, N.N.; Fedotov, A.A.; Il’ina, M.V.; Cherednichenko, D.I.; Ageev, O.A. Modeling of catalytic centers formation processes during annealing of multilayer nanosized metal films for carbon nanotubes growth. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Bartasyte, A.; Plausinaitiene, V.; Abrutis, A.; Stanionyte, S.; Margueron, S.; Boulet, P.; Kobata, T.; Uesu, Y.; Gleize, J. Identification of LiNbO3, LiNb3O8 and Li3NbO4 phases in thin films synthesized with different deposition techniques by means of XRD and Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2013, 25, 205901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Prapitpongwanich, P.; Harizanova, R.; Pengpat, K.; Rüssel, C. Nanocrystallization of ferroelectric lithium niobate in LiNbO3-SiO2 glasses. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 1027–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, T.H.; Hwang, F.T.; Lee, C.T.; Lee, H.Y. Investigation of LiNbO3 thin films grown on Si substrate using magnetron sputter. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2007, 136, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gamaly, E.G.; Rode, A.V.; Luther-Davies, B. Ultrafast ablation with high-pulse-rate lasers. Part I: Theoretical considerations. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 4213–4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, J.; Döbeli, M.; Stender, D.; Conder, K.; Wokaun, A.; Schneider, C.W.; Lippert, T. Plasma interactions determine the composition in pulsed laser deposited thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 114104. [Google Scholar]
  45. Il’ina, M.V.; Il’in, O.I.; Blinov, Y.F.; Konshin, A.A.; Konoplev, B.G.; Ageev, O.A. Piezoelectric response of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Materials 2018, 11, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kubasov, I.V.; Kislyuk, A.M.; Malinkovich, M.D.; Temirov, A.A.; Ksenich, S.V.; Kiselev, D.A.; Bykov, A.S.; Parkhomenko, Y.N. Vibrational power harvester based on lithium niobate bidomain plate. Acta Phys. Pol. 2018, 134, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hu, C.J.; Lin, Y.H.; Tang, C.W.; Tsai, M.Y.; Hsu, W.K.; Kuo, H.F. ZnO-coated carbon nanotubes: Flexible piezoelectric generators. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2941–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yan, J.; Jeong, Y.G. Roles of carbon nanotube and BaTiO3 nanofiber in the electrical, dielectric and piezoelectric properties of flexible nanocomposite generators. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 144, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Balpande, S.S.; Pande, R.S.; Patrikar, R.M. Design and low cost fabrication of green vibration energy harvester. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 251, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cui, Y.; Yu, M.; Gao, S.; Kong, X.; Gu, W.; Zhang, R.; Liu, B. Fabrication and characterization of a piezoelectric energy harvester with clamped-clamped beams. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 055028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Luo, A.; Hu, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, F. Micro electrostatic energy harvester with both broad bandwidth and high normalized power density. Appl. Energy 2018, 212, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Woo, M.S.; Ahn, J.H.; Eom, J.H.; Hwang, W.S.; Kim, J.H.; Yang, C.H.; Song, G.J.; Hong, S.D.; Jhun, J.P.; Sung, T.H. Study on increasing output current of piezoelectric energy harvester by fabrication of multilayer thick film. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 269, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 03984 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the pulsed laser deposition process.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the pulsed laser deposition process.
Materials 13 03984 g001
Materials 13 03984 g002 550
Figure 2. Dependence of the thickness of the obtained LiNbO3 films on the laser pulse energy.
Figure 2. Dependence of the thickness of the obtained LiNbO3 films on the laser pulse energy.
Materials 13 03984 g002
Materials 13 03984 g003 550
Figure 3. X-ray spectra of LiNbO3 films obtained at laser pulse energies of 180 and 220 mJ.
Figure 3. X-ray spectra of LiNbO3 films obtained at laser pulse energies of 180 and 220 mJ.
Materials 13 03984 g003
Materials 13 03984 g004 550
Figure 4. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of LiNbO3 films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) at different laser pulse energies: 180 mJ (a), 200 mJ (b).
Figure 4. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of LiNbO3 films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) at different laser pulse energies: 180 mJ (a), 200 mJ (b).
Materials 13 03984 g004
Materials 13 03984 g005 550
Figure 5. The dependencies of average surface roughness (a) and grain size (b) on laser pulse energy.
Figure 5. The dependencies of average surface roughness (a) and grain size (b) on laser pulse energy.
Materials 13 03984 g005
Materials 13 03984 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM images of LiNbO3 films fabricated with different laser pulse energies: 180 mJ (a) and 220 mJ (b).
Figure 6. SEM images of LiNbO3 films fabricated with different laser pulse energies: 180 mJ (a) and 220 mJ (b).
Materials 13 03984 g006
Materials 13 03984 g007 550
Figure 7. Dependences of the concentration (a) and mobility (b) of charge carriers, and resistivity (c) of LiNbO3 films on the laser pulse energy.
Figure 7. Dependences of the concentration (a) and mobility (b) of charge carriers, and resistivity (c) of LiNbO3 films on the laser pulse energy.
Materials 13 03984 g007
Materials 13 03984 g008 550
Figure 8. Polarization of the obtained LiNbO3 films.
Figure 8. Polarization of the obtained LiNbO3 films.
Materials 13 03984 g008
Materials 13 03984 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of carbon nanotubes grown on various sublayers (growth time 1 min): Ni/V/Si (a), Ni/Cr/Si (b).
Figure 9. SEM images of carbon nanotubes grown on various sublayers (growth time 1 min): Ni/V/Si (a), Ni/Cr/Si (b).
Materials 13 03984 g009
Materials 13 03984 g010 550
Figure 10. Dependence of the carbon nanotube (CNT) array height on the growth time, at the minimum plasma power.
Figure 10. Dependence of the carbon nanotube (CNT) array height on the growth time, at the minimum plasma power.
Materials 13 03984 g010
Materials 13 03984 g011 550
Figure 11. Schematic representation of the proposed nanogenerator.
Figure 11. Schematic representation of the proposed nanogenerator.
Materials 13 03984 g011
Materials 13 03984 g012 550
Figure 12. Piezoresponse of a nanogenerator to an applied mechanical action of a force of 600 nN.
Figure 12. Piezoresponse of a nanogenerator to an applied mechanical action of a force of 600 nN.
Materials 13 03984 g012
Materials 13 03984 g013 550
Figure 13. Dependence of the magnitude of the piezoresponse on the number of deforming cycles.
Figure 13. Dependence of the magnitude of the piezoresponse on the number of deforming cycles.
Materials 13 03984 g013
Materials 13 03984 g014 550
Figure 14. Distribution of electrical potential (V) across the piezoelectric transducer structure when exposed to a force of 1 N.
Figure 14. Distribution of electrical potential (V) across the piezoelectric transducer structure when exposed to a force of 1 N.
Materials 13 03984 g014

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vakulov, Z.; Geldash, A.; Khakhulin, D.; Il’ina, M.V.; Il’in, O.I.; Klimin, V.S.; Dzhuplin, V.N.; Konoplev, B.G.; He, Z.; Ageev, O.A. Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Based on LiNbO3 Thin Films. Materials 2020, 13, 3984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183984

AMA Style

Vakulov Z, Geldash A, Khakhulin D, Il’ina MV, Il’in OI, Klimin VS, Dzhuplin VN, Konoplev BG, He Z, Ageev OA. Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Based on LiNbO3 Thin Films. Materials. 2020; 13(18):3984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vakulov, Zakhar, Andrey Geldash, Daniil Khakhulin, Marina V. Il’ina, Oleg I. Il’in, Viktor S. Klimin, Vladimir N. Dzhuplin, Boris G. Konoplev, Zhubing He, and Oleg A. Ageev. 2020. "Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Based on LiNbO3 Thin Films" Materials 13, no. 18: 3984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183984

APA Style

Vakulov, Z., Geldash, A., Khakhulin, D., Il’ina, M. V., Il’in, O. I., Klimin, V. S., Dzhuplin, V. N., Konoplev, B. G., He, Z., & Ageev, O. A. (2020). Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Based on LiNbO3 Thin Films. Materials, 13(18), 3984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop