Next Article in Journal
Thermal Barrier Stability and Wear Behavior of CVD Deposited Aluminide Coatings for MAR 247 Nickel Superalloy
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Welded Joint Properties on an AISI316L Stainless Steel Tube Manufactured by SLM Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Effect Analysis of Soil Type and Silt Content on Silt-Based Foamed Concrete with Different Density
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Hot Rolling on the Microstructure and Properties of Nanostructured 15Cr ODS Alloys with Al and Zr Addition
Article

Establishing the Optimal Density of the Michell Truss Members

1
Department of Manufacturing Machinery, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Kosice, Letná 9, 04200 Košice, Slovakia
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, The Technical University of Kosice, Letná 9, 04200 Košice, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(17), 3867; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173867
Received: 24 June 2020 / Revised: 18 August 2020 / Accepted: 31 August 2020 / Published: 1 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Machining and Manufacturing of Alloys and Steels)
Topology optimization is a dynamically developing area of industrial engineering. One of the optimization tasks is to create new part shapes, while maintaining the highest possible stiffness and reliability and minimizing weight. Thanks to computer technology and 3D printers, this path of development is becoming more and more topical. Two optimization conditions are often used in topology optimization. The first is to achieve the highest possible structure stiffness. The second is to reduce the total weight of the structure. These conditions do not have a direct effect on the number of elements in the resulting structure. This paper proposes a geometric method that modifies topological structures in terms of the number of truss elements but is not based on the optimization conditions. The method is based on natural patterns and further streamlines the optimization strategies used so far. The method’s efficiency is shown on an ideal Michell truss. View Full-Text
Keywords: Michell truss; golden section; topology optimization Michell truss; golden section; topology optimization
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Stejskal, T.; Dovica, M.; Svetlík, J.; Demeč, P.; Hrivniak, L.; Šašala, M. Establishing the Optimal Density of the Michell Truss Members. Materials 2020, 13, 3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173867

AMA Style

Stejskal T, Dovica M, Svetlík J, Demeč P, Hrivniak L, Šašala M. Establishing the Optimal Density of the Michell Truss Members. Materials. 2020; 13(17):3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stejskal, Tomáš, Miroslav Dovica, Jozef Svetlík, Peter Demeč, Lukáš Hrivniak, and Michal Šašala. 2020. "Establishing the Optimal Density of the Michell Truss Members" Materials 13, no. 17: 3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173867

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop