Next Article in Journal
Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Reaction System Based on Metal-Organic Halide Perovskites
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Thermal Residual Stresses on Mechanical Properties of Silicon Nitride-Based Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Correlating Microstrain and Activated Slip Systems with Mechanical Properties within Rotary Swaged WNiCo Pseudoalloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Aggregates on the Mechanical Damage Suffered by Geotextiles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/ma13010209
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructural Characterization of TiC–White Cast-Iron Composites Fabricated by In Situ Technique

by
Aida B. Moreira
1,2,3,
Ricardo O. Sousa
1,3,
Pedro Lacerda
4,
Laura M. M. Ribeiro
1,3,
Ana M. P. Pinto
5 and
Manuel F. Vieira
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Porto, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
2
CEMMPRE - Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes, University of Porto, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
3
INEGI - Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
4
FERESPE - Fundição de Ferro e Aço Lda., Vila Nova de Famalicão, 4760-485 Fradelos, Portugal
5
CMEMS - Center for MicroElectroMechanics Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(1), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010209
Submission received: 3 December 2019 / Revised: 27 December 2019 / Accepted: 30 December 2019 / Published: 3 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MATERIAIS 2019, XIX Congresso da Sociedade Portuguesa de Materiais and X International Symposium on Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High-chromium white cast-iron specimens locally reinforced with TiC–metal matrix composites were successfully produced via an in situ technique based on combustion synthesis. Powder mixtures of Ti, Al, and graphite were prepared and compressed to fabricate green powder compacts that were inserted into the mold cavity before the casting. The heat of the molten iron causes the ignition of the combustion reaction of the reactant powders, resulting in the formation of the TiC by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis. The microstructure of the resultant composites and the bonding interfaces was characterized by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The microstructural results showed a good adhesion of the composite, suggesting an effective infiltration of the metal into the inserted compact, yet a non-homogeneous distribution of the TiC in the martensite matrix was observed. Based on the results, the in situ synthesis appears to be a great potential technique for industrial applications.

1. Introduction

High-chromium white cast irons are based on the iron–chromium–carbon system. These alloys present an as-cast microstructure composed of a matrix of austenite (γ) or partially martensite (α’) with dispersed particles of iron–chromium carbides of M7C3 type. During the following destabilization heat treatment, secondary precipitation of fine M23C6 type carbides may occur together with the transformation of the γ into α’ [1,2,3,4].
The use of these alloys is widespread due to their high abrasive wear resistance. In particular, alloys with a Cr level ranging from 12% to 30% are applied for crushers, rollers, ball mill liners, and pulverizing equipment, the type of equipment used in the mineral, mining, and cement industries [2,5,6,7,8].
It should be noted that, even when applying hard materials, the abrasive wear mechanism is considered a critical and expensive problem in every processing industry, leading to the failure of components in service [9]. In this context, any single improvement in the wear resistance is a major achievement. Concerning the cast components, a possible approach to improve the wear resistance is to locally reinforce, with ceramic particles, the regions that will be exposed to wear while maintaining the toughness of the bulk component. In situ and ex situ methods could be applied to fabricate the composite reinforcement [10,11,12]. In the ex situ methods, the ceramic is previously produced with the required shape and then inserted into the mold [11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], while in situ methods aim to produce the ceramic particles through the combustion reaction of the powder compacts inserted in the mold cavity [23,24,25,26,27,28].
During the casting process, the metal infiltrates into the pores of the powder compact. The heat of the molten metal causes the combustion reaction between the reactant powders, and the synthesis of the metal matrix composite reinforcement occurs [29,30].
The procedure of the in situ combustion synthesis (CS) is simple, low-cost, applicable to a wide range of geometries, and it permits producing particles with high purity [31]. Two ignition modes of CS are distinguished: self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) and thermal explosion (TE).
In the SHS mode, the combustion reaction is ignited by heating one end of the compact, beginning the exothermic reaction, which propagates through a combustion wave. With respect to the second case, the reaction is ignited by heating the whole compact, and the reaction occurs uniformly throughout the sample [27,32].
According to several investigations, titanium carbide (TiC) and titanium diboride (TiB2) are the best reinforcements for steel components due to their high hardness, excellent wear resistance, good wettability, and stability in ferrous matrices [12,33], although silicon, tungsten, and boron carbides are also reported to be effective reinforcements for wear applications [14,34,35].
Regarding the technology, investigations were focused on the CS of several powder systems, such as Ti–C [30,36,37,38,39,40], Ni–Ti–C [41,42], Ni–Ti–B4C [31], Fe–Ti–C/Fe–Cr–Ti–C [10,23,24,25,43,44], Cu–Ti–B4C [45,46,47], and Al–Ti–B4C [12,48]. Some of them were applied to the reinforcement of steel parts [12,24,25,42,43,45] and very few to the reinforcement of iron components [23,38,39,40].
The present research aims to investigate the local reinforcement of high-chromium white cast-iron specimens through TiC–high-chromium white iron matrix composites, fabricated in situ by SHS. This is of great practical value because high-chromium white cast irons are used for numerous applications that require high wear resistance. Powder mixtures of Ti and graphite were used with Al addition, because it is expected that Al will act as a deoxidizer and grain refiner, contributing to a decrease in the final porosity [49] and favoring the TiC particle size reduction [50].
The accurate characterization of the microstructural phases formed in the reinforced zone was the main objective of the present study since this specific topic was only slightly investigated until now.

2. Materials and Methods

To produce the reinforced specimens, a specific technique with several steps was applied. The first step was the selection and characterization of the initial powders. Commercial Ti powders (99.5 wt.% purity) from Alfa Aesar-ThermoFisher (Kandel) GmbH, Al powders (99.0 wt.% purity) from Goodfellow Cambridge Ltd., and graphite (99.0 wt.% purity) from Elsid (Snagov) S.A. were selected to prepare the green compacts. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using a FEI QUANTA 400 FEG (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) with an energy-dispersive detector (EDS), and dynamic light scattering (DLS, Laser Coulter LS230 granulometer, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) techniques were applied to analyze the morphology and granulometric distribution of the initial powders.
The Ti, Al, and graphite powders were mixed in a mass ratio of 64:20:16 and homogenized in a Turbula shaker-mixer (Willy A. Bachofen AG, Muttenz, Switzerland) for 7 h. Then, the whole mixture was cold-pressed at approximately 70 MPa in a metallic mold to produce parallelepipedal compacts of 31 mm × 12 mm × 7 mm. SEM analyses were performed to verify the quality of the powder mixture and green compacts.
At the end, the green compacts were inserted in the mold cavity, and the high-chromium white cast iron was poured at a temperature of 1460 °C. The chemical composition of the base metal is shown in Table 1.
The fabrication steps performed are shown in Figure 1. The scheme of Figure 2 presents the mold cavity with the inserted green powder compacts and a specimen locally reinforced.
The specimens were crosscut by wire electrical discharge machining to obtain metallographic samples that were ground and polished. After chemical etching with 2% Nital and Beraha-Martensite, the samples were characterized by optical microscopy (OM) using a Leica DM 4000M with a DFC 420 camera (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), SEM, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL 2100 (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo) operated at 200 keV. SEM images were obtained with secondary (SE) or backscattered (BSE) electron detectors. The size and content of the TiC particles in the reinforced specimens were measured from SEM-BSE images, using the image processing program ImageJ (version 1.52, Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The average of two diameters per particle was used to calculate the size of 500 particles, while the content of TiC was measured by the segmentation of 40 arbitrarily selected images.
A detailed characterization of the phases was performed using thin foils prepared in a dual-beam focused ion beam (FIB) FEI Helios NanoLab 450S (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). On TEM, the phases were fully identified through selected area electron diffraction (SAED). Additionally, an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) coupled with the STEM mode was used to map the chemical composition of the phases, using the ZAF correction method.
X-ray diffraction (XRD, Cu Kα radiation, Bruker D8 Discover), with a scanning range (2ϴ) of 20° to 100°, was used to complement the characterization of the formed phases.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Starting Powders

The morphology and the size distribution of the starting powders are presented in Figure 3 and Figure 4. From these figures, we can see that Ti, Al, and graphite powders exhibited different size, shape, and granulometric distribution. The Ti powders (see Figure 3a) presented an irregular shape and a larger size than Al powders. The results of the granulometric distribution showed an average size of 43 µm and a D50 of 42 µm, meaning that 50% of the particles were less than 42 µm (see Figure 4). It is interesting to point out that this result is in accordance with the supplier guide (average size of 44 µm). The Al powders also presented an irregular shape (Figure 3b); however, the majority of the particles were more elongated. In this case, the granulometric analysis (Figure 4) showed a D50 of 11 µm and an average size of 12 µm, being inferior to the average size of 25 µm, certified by the supplier. Lastly, the graphite powders, exhibiting a flake morphology (Figure 3c), were selected by a sieve separation and showed an average size of 43 µm and a D50 of 40 µm, in agreement with the adopted procedure.
It is clear from Figure 5 that the mixing of the powders was well performed since the constituents were uniformly distributed without detecting the presence of agglomerates. There is evidence that the mixing step did not affect the morphology of the initial powders.

3.2. Characterization of the Green Powder Compacts

SEM micrographs showing the morphology and the distribution of the initial powders in the green powder compacts are presented in Figure 6. The white particles correspond to Ti powders, the gray particles correspond to Al powders, and the dark regions correspond to the graphite or the binder phase (Figure 6a). Using an SE detector (Figure 6b), it was also possible to confirm the presence of voids in the structure. Actually, the existence of voids between the particles may be beneficial for the liquid metal infiltration.

3.3. Characterization of the Reinforced Specimens

A polished cross-section of the reinforced cast specimen is presented in Figure 7. It is possible to distinguish two zones, namely, the composite (gray zone) and the high-chromium white cast iron (light-gray zone). The composite zone presents a quasi-uniform depth (6 mm) and a width of around 12 mm. These dimensions are consistent with the initial dimensions of the green compact (12 mm × 7 mm).

3.3.1. Base Metal

The chemical composition of the high-chromium white cast iron used in this research is presented in Table 1. According to the ASTM A532 standard [51], this alloy (25% Cr) is an abrasion-resistant cast iron of class III and type A.
Two different chemical etchings were used for the identification of the phases in the microstructure. The 2% Nital revealed large primary Cr-rich carbides with rod-like structure (white phase) and eutectic cells with finer Cr-rich carbides with blade-like structure surrounded by eutectic austenite (light-gray phase), as shown in Figure 8a. That is a typical microstructure of a hypereutectic ferrous alloy with a pro-eutectic phase (primary carbides) and eutectic cells formed from the eutectic reaction L   →   γ + F e ,   C r 7   C 3 [1,52]. The acicular α’ was revealed by etching with Beraha-Martensite, as shown in Figure 8b.
The achievement of a fully austenitic matrix depends on the chemical homogeneity and the cooling rate imposed; for instance, a localized Cr and C depletion due to carbide formation may provoke the transformation of γ to α’ because of the increase in martensite start temperature (Ms) [5,6]. The dark phase observed in Figure 8 could not be clarified in optical microscopy; thus, SEM and XRD characterization were undertaken to evaluate the microstructure in detail. High-magnification SEM observations showed a lamellar constituent, possibly bainite (see Figure 9).
The XRD analyses confirmed the presence of Cr-rich carbides (M7C3), γ and α’, as shown in the XRD patterns present in Figure 10, which is consistent with other reported results for white cast irons with more than 10% Cr [5,52]. However, no other phase was detected in these patterns that could be associated with the lamellar constituent identified from the SEM images, possibly explained by the low content of this phase.

3.3.2. Composite Zone

The microstructure of the composite and the interface is presented in Figure 11. SEM images show a sound bonding between the composite and the metal matrix with no evidence of voids and porosities, suggesting a good infiltration of the metal into the inserted green powder compact. One possible explanation is the melting of the Al that improves the bonding between the composite and the base metal [50]. The EDS/EDX maps presented in Figure 12 show Ti rich-zones (in yellow) corresponding to titanium carbide networks, Cr-rich zones (in pink) associated to the pro-eutectic and eutectic Cr carbides, and Fe-rich zones (in blue) matching the metal matrix. Figure 12e points to the presence of Al rich-zones that corresponded to the aluminum oxide particles, in green. These oxides could come from the reaction of the Al with the oxygen, during the casting process. At higher magnification (see Figure 12d), fine carbide precipitates, presumably eutectic carbides, were identified in the matrix.
Figure 11 and Figure 12 also show a non-homogeneous distribution of titanium carbide networks in the white cast iron matrix. Some authors [37,39] described this structure as a cellular structure similar to that observed in metallic foams. The XRD analysis (see Figure 13) permitted identifying the presence of TiC, which confirms the effectiveness of the in situ TiC synthesis, martensite, and M7C3 Cr-rich carbides. To note, titanium aluminides (TiAlx (x = 1, 3)) were not identified in this analysis, possibly indicating that the combustion reaction of the Ti and graphite powders was complete, similarly to that referred by Song et al. [27]. It should be pointed out that the diffractograms do not show any peak of γ, in contrast to those relative to the base metal (Figure 10).
Higher-magnification SEM analysis was used to characterize the morphology of the formed phases. Figure 14 shows the TiC particles embedded in the metallic matrix. These particles assume a nearly spherical morphology, and some agglomerates are noted. Figure 14 also exhibits lines of TiC particles (indicated by the yellow arrows). According to Olejnik et al. [38], the formation of these agglomerates results from the bonding of single TiC particles into large aggregates, which take the form of “bubbles” that are filled with the liquid base metal.
In addition, the TEM/SAED and dark-field STEM analysis of the composite zone confirmed the in situ formation of round particles of TiC and a matrix of α’ with Cr-rich carbides (M7C3) precipitated (see Figure 15 and Figure 16). Figure 15a evidences two round TiC particles with different orientation embedded in a matrix of α’ with large M7C3 carbides, and Figure 15b exhibits an interface between α’ and a large M7C3 carbide. It was also possible to notice agglomerated particles, as shown in Figure 16.
The characterization of the composite zone was concluded by measuring the size and content of TiC particles. The TiC content, measured by image segmentation of SEM-BSE images taken on 40 randomly selected fields at a magnification of 2000×, showed a variation from 1% to 43% and an average of 24%, which confirmed the low homogeneity of the TiC particles distribution. The quantitative data obtained concerning the size of the TiC particles are depicted in Figure 17. The histogram shows a normal distribution, and a minimum and maximum value of 0.30 µm and 2.90 µm. The cumulative frequency curve shows that 50% of the analyzed particles were smaller than 1.34 µm. These results are in line with those reported by He et al. [23] on a TiC–Fe-based composite produced by SHS.

4. Conclusions

High-chromium white cast-iron specimens locally reinforced with TiC–metal matrix composites were successfully produced via an in situ technique based on combustion synthesis, using powder mixtures of Ti, Al, and graphite.
The TiC–white cast-iron composite was composed of TiC particles embedded in a matrix of α’ with rod- and blade-shaped Cr-rich carbides (M7C3). The absence of voids and porosities suggests a good infiltration of the liquid metal into the inserted green powder compact.
The average content of TiC particles in the composite zone was 24%. The majority of the TiC particles assumed a nearly spherical morphology and a size inferior to 1.34 µm.
The findings of this study suggest, therefore, that the in situ synthesis appears to be a great potential technique for high-chromium white cast-iron applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.M.; Formal analysis, L.M.M.R., A.M.P.P., and M.F.V.; Funding acquisition, M.F.V.; Investigation, A.B.M., R.O.S., and P.L.; Supervision, L.M.M.R., A.M.P.P., and M.F.V.; Validation, L.M.M.R. and M.F.V.; Writing—original draft, A.B.M. and R.O.S.; Writing—review and editing, L.M.M.R., A.M.P.P., and M.F.V. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FEDER through the program P2020|COMPETE, Projetos em Copromoção (project POCI-01-0247-FEDER-033417), and the program P2020|Norte2020, Programas doutorais (NORTE-08-5369-FSE-000051).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to CEMUP (Centro de Materiais da Universidade do Porto) for expert assistance with SEM. This work was carried out in part through the use of the INL Advanced Electron Microscopy, Imaging, and Spectroscopy Facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Doğan, Ö.; Hawk, J.; Laird, G. Solidification structure and abrasion resistance of high chromium white irons. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1997, 28, 1315–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wiengmoon, A.; Chairuangsri, T.; Pearce, J. An unusual structure of an as-cast 30% Cr alloy white iron. ISIJ Int. 2005, 45, 1658–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Karantzalis, E.; Lekatou, A.; Mavros, H. Microstructure and properties of high chromium cast irons: Effect of heat treatments and alloying additions. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 2009, 22, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Davis, J.R. ASM Specialty Handbook: Cast Irons; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carpenter, S.; Carpenter, D.; Pearce, J. XRD and electron microscope study of an as-cast 26.6% chromium white iron microstructure. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2004, 85, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pearce, J. The use of transmission electron microscopy to study the effects of abrasive wear on the matrix structure of a high chromium cast iron. Wear. 1983, 89, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Heino, V.; Kallio, M.; Valtonen, K.; Kuokkala, V.-T. The role of microstructure in high stress abrasion of white cast irons. Wear. 2017, 388, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pearce, J. Examination of M7C3 carbides in high chromium cast irons using thin foil transmission electron microscopy. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1983, 2, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Totten, G.E. ASM Handbook - Friction, Lubrication, and Wear Technology; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 1992; Volume 18. [Google Scholar]
  10. Olejnik, E.; Szymański, Ł.; Kurtyka, P.; Tokarski, T.; Grabowska, B.; Czapla, P. Hardness and Wear Resistance of TiC-Fe-Cr Locally Reinforcement Produced in Cast Steel. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2016, 16, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kambakas, K.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Solidification of high-Cr white cast iron–WC particle reinforced composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 413, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zou, B.; Shen, P.; Cao, X.; Jiang, Q. The mechanism of thermal explosion (TE) synthesis of TiC–TiB2 particulate locally reinforced steel matrix composites from an Al–Ti–B4C system via a TE-casting route. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 132, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Gao, Y. Three-body abrasive wear behavior of CC/high-Cr WCI composite and its interfacial characteristics. Wear. 2010, 268, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kambakas, K.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Sedimentation casting of wear resistant metal matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 435, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, G.S.; Gao, Y.M.; Xing, J.D.; Wei, S.Z.; Zhang, X.L. Interfacial Characteristics and Wear Resistance of WCp/White-Cast-Iron Composites. Adv. Mater. Res. 2007, 26–28, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Chen, Z.; Shan, Q.; Tan, J. Effect of Cr addition on the microstructure and abrasive wear resistance of WC-reinforced iron matrix surface composites. J. Mater. Res. 2014, 29, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zuo, L.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, Y.; Gao, K.; Liu, H.; Wang, X. In situ synthesis WC reinforced iron surface composite produced by spark plasma sintering and casting. Mater. Lett. 2018, 210, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Yang, L. Interface reaction study of SiC reinforced Mn13 composite synthesised by metal infiltration. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 2012, 25, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, P.; Zeng, S.; Zhang, Z.; Li, W. Microstructure and hardness of WC-Co particle reinforced iron matrix surface composite. China Foundry 2013, 10, 374–379. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hou, S.; Bao, C.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, Y. Microstructure and Wear Behavior of High-Cr WCI Matrix Surface Composite Reinforced with Cemented Carbide Rods. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2013, 22, 2064–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, S.; Gao, Y.; Li, Y. Recent developments in fabrication of ceramic particle reinforced iron matrix wear resistant surface composite using infiltration casting technology. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2014, 41, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leibholz, R.; Robert, M.H.; Leibholz, H.; Bayraktar, E. Development of functionally graded nodular cast iron reinforced with recycled WC particles. In Mechanics of Composite and Multi-Functional Materials; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Volume 7, pp. 241–249. [Google Scholar]
  23. He, S.; Fan, X.a.; Chang, Q.; Xiao, L. TiC-Fe-Based Composite Coating Prepared by Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis. Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 2017, 48, 1748–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Olejnik, E.; Tokarski, T.; Sikora, G.; Sobula, S.; Maziarz, W.; Szymański, Ł.; Grabowska, B. The Effect of Fe Addition on Fragmentation Phenomena, Macrostructure, Microstructure, and Hardness of TiC-Fe Local Reinforcements Fabricated In Situ in Steel Casting. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2019, 50, 975–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bai, J.; Lin, T.; Wang, Z. Research on the TiC Reinforced Steel Matrix Surface Composites Prepared by SHS Casting. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 713–715, 2848–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Merzhanov, A. Combustion processes that synthesize materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1996, 56, 222–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, M.; Huang, B.; Zhang, M.; Li, J. Study of formation behavior of TiC ceramic obtained by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis from Al–Ti–C elemental powders. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2009, 27, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, G.; Wang, W.; Wang, R.; Zhao, C.; Pan, W.; Huang, H.; Du, D.; Wang, D.; Shu, D.; Dong, A. Formation mechanism of spherical TiC in Ni-Ti-C system during combustion synthesis. Materials 2017, 10, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, Z.; Shen, P.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, Q. Fabrication of TiC and TiB2 locally reinforced steel matrix composites using a Fe–Ti–B4C–C system by an SHS-casting route. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 8350–8356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fraś, E.; Olejnik, E.; Janas, A.; Kolbus, A. Fabrication of in situ composite layer on cast steel. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2010, 10, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, Y.-f.; Wang, H.-y.; Liang, Y.-h.; Zhao, R.-y.; Jiang, Q.-c. Fabrication of steel matrix composites locally reinforced with different ratios of TiC/TiB2 particulates using SHS reactions of Ni–Ti–B4C and Ni–Ti–B4C–C systems during casting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 445, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rogachev, A.S.; Mukasyan, A.S. Combustion for Material Synthesis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, H.Y.; Jiang, Q.C.; Ma, B.X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, F. Fabrication of Steel Matrix Composite Locally Reinforced with in Situ TiB2 Particulate using Self–Propagating High–Temperature Synthesis Reaction of Ni–Ti–B System During Casting. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2005, 7, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Čikara, D.; Rakin, M.; Todić, A. Cast Steel-SiC composites as wear resistant materials. FME Trans. 2009, 37, 151–155. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou, R.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, D. The effect of volume fraction of WC particles on erosion resistance of WC reinforced iron matrix surface composites. Wear 2003, 255, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Olejnik, E.; Sobula, S.; Tokarski, T.; Sikora, G. Composite zones obtained by in situ synthesis in steel castings. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2013, 58, 769–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Olejnik, E.; Sikora, G.; Sobula, S.; Tokarski, T.; Grabowska, B. Effect of compaction Pressure applied to TiC reactants on the Microstructure and Properties of Composite Zones Produced in situ in steel castings. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2014, 782, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Olejnik, E.; Janas, A.; Kolbus, A.; Sikora, G. The composition of reaction substrates for TiC carbides synthesis and its influence on the thickness of iron casting composite layer. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2011, 11, 165–168. [Google Scholar]
  39. Olejnik, E.; Górny, M.; Tokarski, T.; Grabowska, B.; Kmita, A.; Sikora, G. Composite zones produced in iron castings by in-situ synthesis of TiC carbides. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2013, 58, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Olejnik, E.; Janas, A.; Kolbus, A.; Grabowska, B. Composite layers fabricated by in situ technique in Iron castings. Compos. Theory Pract. 2011, 2, 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jiang, Q.; Zhao, F.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z. In situ TiC-reinforced steel composite fabricated via self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of Ni–Ti–C system. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 2043–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, Y.-F.; Wang, H.-Y.; Liang, Y.-H.; Zhao, R.-Y.; Jiang, Q.-C. Effect of C particle size on the porous formation of TiC particulate locally reinforced steel matrix composites via the SHS reaction of Ni–Ti–C system during casting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 474, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bai, J.L.; Lin, T.; Wang, Z. Effect of Different Binder on the TiC Reinforced Steel Matrix Surface Composites. Adv. Mater. Res. 2015, 1089, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Jiang, Q. Fabrication of in situ TiC locally reinforced manganese steel matrix composite via combustion synthesis during casting. Mater. Des. 2013, 44, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Han, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Ren, L. Dry Sliding Friction and Wear Mechanism of TiC-TiB2 Particulate Locally Reinforced Mn-Steel Matrix Composite from a Cu-Ti-B4C System via a Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis (SHS) Casting Route. Tribol. Tran. 2015, 58, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liang, Y.; Han, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Ren, L. Effect of Cu content in Cu–Ti–B4C system on fabricating TiC/TiB2 particulates locally reinforced steel matrix composites. Mater. Des. 2012, 40, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, H.; Huang, L.; Jiang, Q. In situ synthesis of TiB2–TiC particulates locally reinforced medium carbon steel–matrix composites via the SHS reaction of Ni–Ti–B4C system during casting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 407, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jiang, Q.; Ma, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Y. Fabrication of steel matrix composites locally reinforced with in situ TiB2–TiC particulates using self-propagating high-temperature synthesis reaction of Al–Ti–B4C system during casting. Compos. Part A. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zou, B.; Shen, P.; Jiang, Q. Reaction synthesis of TiC–TiB2/Al composites from an Al–Ti–B4C system. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 9927–9933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Choi, Y.; Rhee, S.-W. Effect of aluminium addition on the combustion reaction of titanium and carbon to form TiC. J. Mater. Sci. 1993, 28, 6669–6675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Standard Specification for Abrasion-Resistant Cast Irons. In A532/A532M – 10; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010. [CrossRef]
  52. Laird, G.; Gundlach, R.; Rohrig, K. Abrasion-Resistant Cast Iron Handbook; American Foundry Society: Des Plaines, IL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
Materials 13 00209 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of the fabrication steps performed.
Figure 1. Scheme of the fabrication steps performed.
Materials 13 00209 g001
Materials 13 00209 g002 550
Figure 2. Scheme of the mold cavity with the inserted green compacts and the reinforced cast specimen.
Figure 2. Scheme of the mold cavity with the inserted green compacts and the reinforced cast specimen.
Materials 13 00209 g002
Materials 13 00209 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM-backscattered electron (BSE) images showing the morphology of the starting powders: (a) Ti, (b) Al, and (c) graphite.
Figure 3. SEM-backscattered electron (BSE) images showing the morphology of the starting powders: (a) Ti, (b) Al, and (c) graphite.
Materials 13 00209 g003
Materials 13 00209 g004 550
Figure 4. Particle size distribution (D10, D50, and D90) of starting powders. Data were collected from dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyses.
Figure 4. Particle size distribution (D10, D50, and D90) of starting powders. Data were collected from dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyses.
Materials 13 00209 g004
Materials 13 00209 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM-BSE image of the mixture of the starting powders and binder.
Figure 5. SEM-BSE image of the mixture of the starting powders and binder.
Materials 13 00209 g005
Materials 13 00209 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM images of the green powder compacts, using (a) BSE mode and (b) secondary electron (SE) mode.
Figure 6. SEM images of the green powder compacts, using (a) BSE mode and (b) secondary electron (SE) mode.
Materials 13 00209 g006
Materials 13 00209 g007 550
Figure 7. A polished cross-section of the reinforced specimen, showing the composite material.
Figure 7. A polished cross-section of the reinforced specimen, showing the composite material.
Materials 13 00209 g007
Materials 13 00209 g008 550
Figure 8. Optical image of the high-chromium white cast iron in the as-cast condition, after chemical etching with 2% Nital (a) and Beraha-Martensite (b).
Figure 8. Optical image of the high-chromium white cast iron in the as-cast condition, after chemical etching with 2% Nital (a) and Beraha-Martensite (b).
Materials 13 00209 g008
Materials 13 00209 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM-SE image of the microstructure of the high-chromium white cast iron in the as-cast condition at different magnifications.
Figure 9. SEM-SE image of the microstructure of the high-chromium white cast iron in the as-cast condition at different magnifications.
Materials 13 00209 g009
Materials 13 00209 g010 550
Figure 10. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the high-chromium white cast iron in the as-cast condition in the 2ϴ range of 20°–100° (a) and 35°–55° (b).
Figure 10. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the high-chromium white cast iron in the as-cast condition in the 2ϴ range of 20°–100° (a) and 35°–55° (b).
Materials 13 00209 g010
Materials 13 00209 g011 550
Figure 11. SEM-BSE images of the microstructure of the reinforced specimen: (a) base metal and composite and (b) interface region at higher magnification.
Figure 11. SEM-BSE images of the microstructure of the reinforced specimen: (a) base metal and composite and (b) interface region at higher magnification.
Materials 13 00209 g011
Materials 13 00209 g012 550
Figure 12. SEM-BSE images of the microstructure of the composite zone (a,b) at higher magnification; energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping: (c,d) superposition of Cr (pink), Ti (yellow), and Fe (blue); (e) mapping of Al and (f) mapping of C.
Figure 12. SEM-BSE images of the microstructure of the composite zone (a,b) at higher magnification; energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping: (c,d) superposition of Cr (pink), Ti (yellow), and Fe (blue); (e) mapping of Al and (f) mapping of C.
Materials 13 00209 g012
Materials 13 00209 g013 550
Figure 13. XRD patterns of the composite zone in the 2ϴ range of 20°–100° (a) and 35°–51° (b).
Figure 13. XRD patterns of the composite zone in the 2ϴ range of 20°–100° (a) and 35°–51° (b).
Materials 13 00209 g013
Materials 13 00209 g014 550
Figure 14. SEM-BSE images of the microstructure of the composite zone, showing (a) TiC particle clusters, highlighted in the image; (b) with higher magnification, coarse primary and eutectic M7C3 carbides, and Al oxides (black particles).
Figure 14. SEM-BSE images of the microstructure of the composite zone, showing (a) TiC particle clusters, highlighted in the image; (b) with higher magnification, coarse primary and eutectic M7C3 carbides, and Al oxides (black particles).
Materials 13 00209 g014
Materials 13 00209 g015 550
Figure 15. Dark-field TEM image of the composite showing (a) TiC particles and α’ phase and (b) interface between α’ and a M7C3 type carbide. The identification of phases was conducted by selected area electron diffraction (SAED) analysis with (c) [1 1 2] zone axis of TiC, (d) [1 1 0] zone axis of M7C3, and (e) [1 1 1] zone axis of α’.
Figure 15. Dark-field TEM image of the composite showing (a) TiC particles and α’ phase and (b) interface between α’ and a M7C3 type carbide. The identification of phases was conducted by selected area electron diffraction (SAED) analysis with (c) [1 1 2] zone axis of TiC, (d) [1 1 0] zone axis of M7C3, and (e) [1 1 1] zone axis of α’.
Materials 13 00209 g015
Materials 13 00209 g016 550
Figure 16. Dark-field STEM image of the composite zone and the EDS maps of Cr, Fe, Ti, and Al from the correspondent area.
Figure 16. Dark-field STEM image of the composite zone and the EDS maps of Cr, Fe, Ti, and Al from the correspondent area.
Materials 13 00209 g016
Materials 13 00209 g017 550
Figure 17. Size distribution of the TiC particles in the composite zone (two perpendicular diameters were measured in 500 particles).
Figure 17. Size distribution of the TiC particles in the composite zone (two perpendicular diameters were measured in 500 particles).
Materials 13 00209 g017
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of the studied high-chromium white cast iron (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the studied high-chromium white cast iron (wt.%).
CSiMnCrNiFe
3.100.600.5426.800.30Balance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moreira, A.B.; Sousa, R.O.; Lacerda, P.; Ribeiro, L.M.M.; Pinto, A.M.P.; Vieira, M.F. Microstructural Characterization of TiC–White Cast-Iron Composites Fabricated by In Situ Technique. Materials 2020, 13, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010209

AMA Style

Moreira AB, Sousa RO, Lacerda P, Ribeiro LMM, Pinto AMP, Vieira MF. Microstructural Characterization of TiC–White Cast-Iron Composites Fabricated by In Situ Technique. Materials. 2020; 13(1):209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moreira, Aida B., Ricardo O. Sousa, Pedro Lacerda, Laura M. M. Ribeiro, Ana M. P. Pinto, and Manuel F. Vieira. 2020. "Microstructural Characterization of TiC–White Cast-Iron Composites Fabricated by In Situ Technique" Materials 13, no. 1: 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010209

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop