Next Article in Journal
Bioselectivity Induced by Chirality of New Terpenyl Organoselenium Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
The Energy Storage Properties of Refrigerants (R170, R134a, R143a, and R152a) in Mof-5 Nanoparticles: A Molecular Simulation Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Features of the Microstructure and Chemical Compositions of Vanadium-Containing Slags Including Determination of Vanadium Oxidation Degrees

State Scientific Centre, I.P. Bardin Central Research Institute for Ferrous Metallurgy, 23/9 bdg. 2, Radio str., 105005 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(21), 3578; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213578
Submission received: 3 October 2019 / Revised: 28 October 2019 / Accepted: 29 October 2019 / Published: 31 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Materials Characterization)

Abstract

:
Metallurgical vanadium-containing converter slag could be used as an alternative vanadium source. The development of a physico-chemical basis for the comprehensive processing of industrial vanadium-containing debris requires information about their elemental composition as well as the oxidation degrees of the elements and forms of compounds in order to solve two key problems: a better utilization of industrial wastes and a lowering of environment impact. This research was aimed at the development of methods to determine the fractions of elements and their oxidation degrees in vanadium-containing industrial debris exemplified by basic oxygen converter vanadium slags. A set of bulk and surface analysis methods (X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)) was used for this purpose: based on results of elemental analysis, SEM detects the oxide phases of metals, while an analysis of the XPS lines’ fine structures provides fractions of corresponding elements with definite oxidation degrees. In this way, one can determine the fractions of vanadium in multiple oxidation degrees in slags and can properly select the chemicals and parameters of chemical processes for its fullest extraction.

1. Introduction

Vanadium is considered to be one of the prospective alloying metals that can produce steels with high mechanical and other consumer properties. Approximately 85% of the consumed vanadium relates to ferrovanadium [1]. Most vanadium is extracted from titanium magnetite ores. Currently, ferrovanadium production technology includes four process stages: the fabrication of vanadium iron, the processing of the iron to a steel semi-product and a converter slag, the fabrication of technical vanadium pentoxide, and the electrical furnace or ladle melting of ferrovanadium [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. There are also other options for vanadium extraction [10,11,12,13,14].
Vanadium slag is a strongly consolidated mass with metallic inclusions. An oxide part of the slag contains compounds of iron, silicon, manganese, vanadium, chromium, titanium, magnesium, aluminum, and calcium. Metal inclusions are formed by an iron-based alloy, and their dimensions can vary from fractions of millimeter to several tens of centimeters in diameter. Vanadium spinel is the main mineral in the slag. Its silicate part is comprised of fayalite, cristobalite, olivine, pyroxene, and glass. It is generally believed that the vanadium in the slag has a +3 oxidation degree, mainly in spinel [15].
Metallurgical slags, vanadium processing slams, vanadium-containing quartzites, shales, pitch [16], uranium ore [17], bauxites [18], ash residuals from power units burning heavy oil fractions [19], dead catalysts [20], the ash of coal power plants, etc., could be alternative vanadium sources. A hydrometallurgical fabrication of technical vanadium pentoxide is characterized by a high amount of wastes containing V compounds; the main ones are dump slimes resulting from the leaching of vanadium from calcinated burden [21]. According to [22], one ton of produced V2O5 generates about 200 tons of tails. Soluble V and Cr compounds pose a serious threat of environment pollution, especially when the latter is presented in the +6 oxidation degree.
The development of the physico-chemical basis for the comprehensive processing of industrial vanadium-containing debris requires information about their elemental composition as well as the oxidation degrees of elements and the forms of compounds in order to solve two key problems: a better utilization of industrial wastes and a lowering of environment impact. The present work was aimed at the development of methods to determine the fractions of elements and their oxidation degrees in vanadium-containing industrial debris exemplified by basic oxygen converter vanadium slags.

2. Materials and Methods

The vanadium containing converter slags from Joint Stock Company Nizhniy Tagil Iron and Steel Works obtained from the smelts of different steel grades alloyed by V, Ti, and Mn were studied in this research. Five slag compositions with vanadium contents of more than 10 wt.% were selected for detailed investigations.
The elemental composition of the slags was determined using an AXIOSmax Advanced (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. Probes were dispersed to diameter about 40 μm by an RS200 (Retsch, Haan, Germany) vibrational planetary mill; they were dried after milling and melted with a melting blend of lithium tetraborate, carbonate, and nitrate in a platinum crucible using an Eagon 2 (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) furnace. The elemental composition of the samples is presented in Table 1.
The phase composition of the slags in the initial state was determined by scanning electron microscopy. Metallographic specimens were prepared according standard ISO 4967:2013 procedure [23] on slag pieces with dimensions of about 20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm. The specimens were cleaned after polishing by chemically pure acetone to avoid occasional surface contaminations.
The sample surfaces were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JSM-35C (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications from ×30 to ×1000, and the studied areas on the samples’ surface were from several square millimeters to several microns, respectively. Five metallographic samples were investigated for each slag composition.
Preliminary quantitative phase composition was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with using Back Scattered Electrons image analysis (BEI) on JSM-35C with the solid pair detector attached. This method has been widely used in mineralogy from 1984 to the present [24]. The phase composition analysis was based on the distinctive contrast of each phases: The intensity of the backscattered electrons is directly proportional to the average atomic number (AAN) of the observed phases and is used for imaging distinguishing individual mineral grains and identifying the zones of discrete phases. For example, the AAN of Al2O3 = (2 × 13 + 3 × 8)/5 = 10; Fe3C will be darker than α-Fe.
Contrast resolution can distinguish differences as low as 0.1 AAN. High quality atomic number contrast images are produced providing much more useful information than those normally obtained from SEM. Compositional information dominates topographic information in the images, allowing for the differentiation of most phases. Metallurgical slag contains a set of known mineral compositions. Quantitative analysis is one problem in the investigation of a huge number of metallographic samples. BEI analysis is the most effective and simple analysis method in this case because wavelength dispersive (WD) and energy dispersive (ED) X-ray investigations are far too slow to be used for routine and representative mineral identification [25]. The microstructure image processing was done by ImageJ [26] software to obtain brightness distribution diagrams with typical peaks. The peak squares relations correspond to the volume fractions of phases in the slag sample. The gray scale segmentation of BEI was based on the principles described in [27].
The analysis of the oxidation degrees of elements in slags was performed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on ESCALAB Mk2 (VG, East Grinstead, UK) at a vacuum of 3 × 10−8 Pa. An electron spectrometer was equipped with an X-ray Al Kα monochromatic source (hν = 1486.6 eV, Au 4f3/2–5/2 full width at half maximum (FWHM) = 0.6 eV). Powder samples were used to get the averaged compositions. The powder was placed on the special sample holder using conducting carbon ribbon. The sample charge was suppressed by slow energy electron bombardment with an energy of 30 eV. The fine structure of XPS lines was analyzed using UNIFIT2007 [28] software.

3. Results and Discussion

The phase composition analysis was based on typical contrast for each of phases. Brightness distribution histograms were obtained from micro images; the peak squares correspond to phases contents in the slag samples. Thus, the main peak on the histograms was associated with a matrix supposedly consisting of magnetite (FeO·Fe2O3). Relatively big iron particles from 50 to 350 μm were found on several microstructures. They had a light-grey contrast. On the SEM images, one can also see the vanadium-containing spinel MnO·V2O3 (bright contrast) and pores with polyhedral inclusions of TiO2 (Figures 2b, 3b, 4b, and 5a) single crystals with a characteristic faceting of the {001}, {101}-type and quasi-continuous microfacets [29]. The contrast on the SEM images is stipulated by so-called “atomic number contrast” arising from different reflection of secondary electrons from regions containing heavy and light elements with bigger and smaller AANs.
Thus, the AANs of the FeO·Fe2O3, MnO·V2O3, TiO2, and Fe phases presented in metallurgical slag are very different and equal to 15.7, 13.2, 12.7, and 26, respectively, that allowed us to easily identify them on the BEI images.
The microstructures of slag samples and phase contrast brightness distribution histograms are presented in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5. An analysis of the morphology of inclusions and phase contrast allowed us to identify the quantitative composition of the slag. This technique is typical for the electron microscopy of minerals. The histograms presented in Figure 1c, Figure 2c, Figure 3c, Figure 4c, and Figure 5c were obtained as the averages of 10 view fields for each of five metallographic sections. The phase compositions of the slags were based on a histogram analysis and are presented in Table 2. One can see that these samples have similar sets of phases, but phase relationship varies in a wide range.
To detect the amounts of vanadium with different oxidation degrees, we used XPS. It is well known that the kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted from the inner shells of atoms depends on the chemical bonds or oxidation degree of the atom; the so-called chemical shift of the XPS characteristic line allowed us to identify the oxidation degree of the element in a compound. The number of registered photoelectrons (intensity of the peak) corresponding to a given element depends on the element’s concentration plus the yield cross-section σ of electrons located on the corresponding orbitals of the atom. Taking into account σ(O1s) = 2.93, σ(V2p3/2) = 6.37, and σ(V2p1/2) = 3.29, the oxygen line intensity should be 2.17 times lower than the V2p3/2 line and 1.12 times lower than the V2p1/2 line at equal concentrations of O and V. By using the correction for σ, one can quantitatively determine the element content from XPS spectra. For example, by taking the relationship of integral intensities of vanadium and oxygen lines (IV/IO) into account, one can calculate their content relation in the sample. Based on XPS line fine structure analysis, we can get fractions of the element with various oxidation degrees. This technique is widely used in XPS as a standard one (Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis, ESCA) [30,31,32].
Photoelectron spectroscopy allowed us to determine the so-called “chemical shifts” of the characteristic elemental lines. These chemical shifts of the electron binding energies are stipulated by a change of the oxidation degrees of the elements or a change in the number of valence electrons transferred from donor atoms (V) to acceptor atoms (O) at the formation of the chemical compound.
Figure 6 and Table 3 present the results of the vanadium slags studied by XPS. The figure presents the lines of the inner shells O1s with a binding energy in the vicinity of 530 eV and the lines of the V2p doublet with binding energies about 513 eV (V2p3/2) and 520 eV (V2p1/2). Each of the V2p doublet components corresponds to a definite oxidation degree of vanadium: The V4+ binding energies are Eb = 513.6 and 519.8 eV, while the components at Eb = 516.4 and 522.8 eV manifest in the presence of V3+. By measuring the integral intensities of components, we can determine a part of V in the definite oxidation state in the sample.
The presence of V4+ in large quantities in metallurgical slags was firstly established in this research. These data, approved by XPS, contradict common opinion regarding the singular presence of V3+ in the slag [11,12,13]
The oxygen line O1s, which has distinctive asymmetry, demonstrates the overlapping of signals from the oxygen bound with metals with +3 and +2 oxidation degrees: Me3+ corresponds to Eb = 530.4 ± 0.2 eV, while Me2+ is associated with Eb = 531.8 ± 0.2 eV.
The oxidation degree data in the slags with a quantitative analysis of element contents from the XPS line fine structure analysis are presented in Table 3. These data qualitatively confirm the presence of a mixture of various elements oxides in probes with a preferential content of metals with a +2 oxidation degree.

4. Conclusions

The application of scanning electron microscopy, together with digital image analysis, allowed us to quickly estimate the relationships of the multiple phases presented in slag samples.
For the first time, the fact that V4+ is present in large quantities in metallurgical slags was approved by an XPS analysis. Such information is critically important for vanadium extraction technology improvements.
The integrated application of surface analysis methods such as scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy allows us to determine the content of vanadium in multiple oxidation degrees in slags and to properly select the chemicals and parameters of chemical processes for its fullest extraction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K., D.W. and A.V.; investigation, D.W., A.K., V.V., A.V., U.K.; formal analysis, V.V., U.K.; visualization, D.W., A.K., V.V.; writing—original draft preparation, D.W., A.K.; writing—review and editing, D.W., A.K., V.V., A.V., U.K.

Funding

The research was fulfilled with partial financial support of the RFBR grant No. 18-29-24074_mk.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Moskalyk, R.R.; Alfantazi, A.M. Processing of vanadium: A review. Miner. Eng. 2003, 169, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lyakishev, N.P.; Slotvinsky-Sidak, N.P.; Pliner, Y.L.; Lappo, S.I. Vanadium in Ferrous Metallurgy; Metallurgiya: Moscow, Russia, 1983; p. 192. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  3. Barolin, H. Oxidation of Vanadium Slag; Metallurgical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Xue, Z. An Environment-Friendly Process Featuring Calcified Roasting and Precipitation Purification to Prepare Vanadium Pentoxide from the Converter Vanadium Slag. Metals 2019, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Z.H.; Li, Y.; Chen, M.L.; Nueraihemaiti, A.; Du, J.; Fan, X.; Tao, C.Y. Enhanced leaching of vanadium slag in acidic solution by eletro-oxidation. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 159, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mirazimi, S.M.J.; Rashchi, F.; Saba, M. A new approach for direct leaching of vanadium from LD converter slag. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, 94, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, G.Q.; Luo, D.M.; Deng, C.H.; Lv, L.; Liang, B.; Li, C. Simultaneous extraction of vanadium and titanium from vanadium slag using ammonium sulfate roasting-leaching process. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 742, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, W.; Xue, Z.L. Oxidation kinetics of vanadium slag roasting in the presence of calcium oxide. Min. Proc. Ext. Met. Rev. 2017, 38, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiang, J.Y.; Huang, Q.Y.; Lv, X.W.; Bai, C.G. Extraction of vanadium from converter slag by two-step sulfuric acid leaching process. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 170, 1089–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Bao, S.; Liu, T.; Chen, T.; Huang, J. The technology of extracting vanadium from stone coal in China: History, current status and future prospects. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 109, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, G.; Zhang, T.; Lü, G.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z. Extraction of vanadium from vanadium slag by high pressure oxidative acid leaching. Int. J. Miner. Met. Mater. 2015, 22, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wen, J.; Jiang, T.; Wang, J.; Gao, H.; Lu, L. An efficient utilization of high chromium vanadium slag: Extraction of vanadium based on manganese carbonate roasting and detoxification processing of chromium-containing tailings. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 378, 120733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, M.; Xue, X.; Li, L.; Yang, H.; Bai, R.; Wang, H. A novel method to extract vanadium from vanadium-bearing steel slag using sodium carbonate solution. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2018, 54, 911–921. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao, M.; Xue, X.; Li, L.; Yang, H.; Chen, D. Leaching behavior and kinetics of vanadium extraction from vanadium-bearing steel slag. Met. Res. Technol. 2019, 116, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Smirnov, L.A.; Rovnushkin, V.A.; Smirnov, A.L. Formation and phase-mineralogical composition of converter slags. Russ. Metall. 2015, 3, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oguntimehin, I.I.; Ipinmoroti, K.O. Solvent Extraction of Vanadium from Nigerian Bitumen Using Tri-Butylphosphate. J. Appl. Sci. 2007, 7, 4028–4031. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chekmarev, A.M.; Buchikhin, E.P.; Parygin, I.A.; Smirnov, K. Patterns of extractive leaching of uranium and vanadium from an ore. Found. Chem. Eng. 2011, 45, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baikonurova, A.O. Vanadium Extraction Opportunities in Alumina Production and Vanadium Complex Study in Organic Phase. Eurasian Chem. Tech. J. 2003, 5, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nazari, E.; Rashchi, F.; Saba, M.; Mirazimi, M. Simultaneous recovery of vanadium and nickel from power plant fly-ash: Optimization of parameters using response surface methodology. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 2687–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Painuly, A.S. Separation and recovery of vanadium from spent vanadium pentaoxide catalyst by Cyanex 272. Environ. Syst. Res. 2015, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kologrieva, U.A.; Seryogin, A.N.; Pochtaryov, A.N. Development of sulfuric acid technology for processing sludge from the hydrometallurgical production of vanadium pentoxide. Probl. Ferr. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2015, 4, 63–67. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiang, J.; Huang, Q.; Lv, W.; Pei, G.; Lv, X.; Bai, C. Recovery of tailings from the vanadium extraction process by carbothermic reduction method: Thermodynamic, experimental and hazardous potential assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 357, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. ISO 4967:2013(E). Steel—Determination of Content of Nonmetallic Inclusions—Micrographic Method Using Standard Diagrams, 3rd ed.; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; 36p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Petruck, W. Applied Mineralogy in the Mining Industry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; 288p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gottlieb, P. The revolutionary impact of automated mineralogy on mining and mineral processing. In Proceedings of the XXIV International Mineral Processing Congress, Beijing, China, 24–28 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
  26. ImageJ. An Open Platform for Scientific Image Analysis. Available online: https://imagej.net/Welcome (accessed on 6 August 2019).
  27. Shaffer, M. Discriminating hematite and magnetite and quantifying their associations using the jktech mineral liberation analyzer. In Proceedings of the Conference Proceedings of 48 Annual Conference of Metallurgists, Sudbury, ON, Canada, 23–26 August 2009; p. 73. [Google Scholar]
  28. UNIFIT for Windows Software. Unifit Scientific Software GmbH. Available online: http://www.unifit-software.de (accessed on 6 August 2019).
  29. Yang, S.; Xing, Y.; Wu, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhao, H.; Yu, Y.Y.; Gong, X.Q.; Yang, T.H.G. Single crystals with a curved surface. Nat. Commun. 2015, 5, 6355. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ratner, B.; Castner, D. Chapter 3. Electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis. In Surface Analysis—The Principal Techniques, 2nd ed.; Vickerman, J.C., Gilmore, I.S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 47–112. [Google Scholar]
  31. Watts, J.F.; Wolstenholme, J. An Introduction to Surface Analysis by XPS and AES; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; p. 212. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kovalev, A.I.; Wainstein, D.L. Surface analysis techniques for investigation of modified surfaces, nanocomposites, chemical, and structure transformations. In Self-Organization during Friction. Advance Surface Engineered Materials; Fox-Rabinovich, G.S., Totten, G.E., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 81–120. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #1 grind; scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Figure 1. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #1 grind; scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Materials 12 03578 g001
Figure 2. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #2 grind; SEM.
Figure 2. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #2 grind; SEM.
Materials 12 03578 g002
Figure 3. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #3 grind; SEM.
Figure 3. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #3 grind; SEM.
Materials 12 03578 g003
Figure 4. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #4 grind; SEM.
Figure 4. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #4 grind; SEM.
Materials 12 03578 g004
Figure 5. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #5 grind; SEM.
Figure 5. Typical back scattered electron images (a,b) of microstructures and contrast histogram (c) of the Sample #5 grind; SEM.
Materials 12 03578 g005
Figure 6. Fine structure of donor atoms (V) XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) lines 2p3/2–1/2 and O1s obtained from Samples 2 (a), 3 (b), 4 (c), and 5 (d).
Figure 6. Fine structure of donor atoms (V) XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) lines 2p3/2–1/2 and O1s obtained from Samples 2 (a), 3 (b), 4 (c), and 5 (d).
Materials 12 03578 g006
Table 1. The elemental composition of slags studied, wt. %.
Table 1. The elemental composition of slags studied, wt. %.
Sample #AlCaCrFeMgMnPSSiTiVO
10.681.562.5825.30.9311.60.0120.0116.577.4812.1balance
20.882.842.8723.20.9811.60.0210.0136.115.9613.6balance
31.271.552.7924.01.8310.60.0160.0065.237.7413.2balance
41.861.202.3729.12.488.60.0400.0054.696.7511.6balance
52.271.972.4522.41.789.30.0270.0138.055.0412.0balance
Table 2. Phase composition of slag samples according to SEM data.
Table 2. Phase composition of slag samples according to SEM data.
Sample #Phase Fraction, %
FeO·Fe2O3MnO·VXOYTiO2Fe
1balance11.6 ± 1.19.2 ± 1.24.2 ± 0.7
2balance17.8 ± 1.68.2 ± 1.24.5 ± 0.8
3balance23.1 ± 1.81.7 ± 0.810.9 ± 1.4
4balance8.0 ± 1.021.6 ± 1.83.8 ± 0.7
5balance6.5 ± 0.924.1 ± 1.83.5 ± 0.6
Table 3. Content of elements with different oxidation degrees in slags.
Table 3. Content of elements with different oxidation degrees in slags.
Sample #Binding Energy, eVOxidation DegreeVolume Fraction, %
2515.3; 522.4V3+65.8
517.6; 524.5V4+34.2
531.1Me2+43.1
533.7Me3+56.9
3513.6; 519.8V3+56.4
516.4; 522.8V4+43.6
530.3Me2+42.0
531.6Me3+58.0
4512.8; 519.6V3+49.6
514.7; 522.3V4+50.4
529.6Me2+39.6
531.3Me3+60.4
5513.5; 520.0V3+34.8
516.5; 523.1V4+65.2
530.4Me2+34.1
532.0Me3+65.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kovalev, A.; Wainstein, D.; Vakhrushev, V.; Volkov, A.; Kologrieva, U. Features of the Microstructure and Chemical Compositions of Vanadium-Containing Slags Including Determination of Vanadium Oxidation Degrees. Materials 2019, 12, 3578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213578

AMA Style

Kovalev A, Wainstein D, Vakhrushev V, Volkov A, Kologrieva U. Features of the Microstructure and Chemical Compositions of Vanadium-Containing Slags Including Determination of Vanadium Oxidation Degrees. Materials. 2019; 12(21):3578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213578

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kovalev, Anatoly, Dmitry Wainstein, Vladimir Vakhrushev, Anton Volkov, and Ulyana Kologrieva. 2019. "Features of the Microstructure and Chemical Compositions of Vanadium-Containing Slags Including Determination of Vanadium Oxidation Degrees" Materials 12, no. 21: 3578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213578

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop