Next Article in Journal
Bi-Material Negative Thermal Expansion Inverted Trapezoid Lattice based on A Composite Rod
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of PTFE Film on 316L Stainless Steel Deposited through Spin Coating and Its Anticorrosion Performance in Multi Acidic Mediums
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Doping Temperatures and Nitrogen Precursors on the Physicochemical, Optical, and Electrical Conductivity Properties of Nitrogen-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Post Weld Heat Treatment Precipitation on Duplex Stainless Steels Weld Overlay towards Pitting Corrosion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 20
10.3390/ma12203378
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhausts by an Fe/N/Co–TiO2 Waterborne Coating under Visible Light

by
Huiyun Xia
*,
Guanyu Liu
,
Rui Zhang
,
Lifang Song
and
Huaxin Chen
*
Engineering Research Center of Transportation Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(20), 3378; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203378
Submission received: 15 September 2019 / Revised: 1 October 2019 / Accepted: 14 October 2019 / Published: 16 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials and Coatings for Extreme Environments)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Based on the three-dimensional network structure of a polymer and the principle of photocatalysts, a visible-light-responsive and durable photocatalytic coating for the degradation of vehicle exhaust (VE) has been constructed using a waterborne acrylic acid emulsion as the coating substrate; Fe/N/Co–TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) as photocatalytic components; and water, pigments, and fillers as additives. The visible-light-responsive Fe/N/Co–TiO2 NPs with an average size of 100 nm were prepared by sol-gel method firstly. The co-doping of three elements extended the absorption range of the modified TiO2 nanoparticles to the visible light region, and showed the highest light absorption intensity, which was confirmed by the ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra (UV-Vis). X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements showed that element doping prevents the transition from anatase to rutile and increases the transition temperature. TiO2 was successfully doped due to the reduction of the chemical binding energy of Ti, as revealed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The degradation rates of NOX, CO, and CO2 in VE by Fe/N/Co–TiO2 NPs under visible light were 71.43%, 23.79%, and 21.09%, respectively. In contrast, under the same conditions, the degradation efficiencies of coating for VE decreased slightly. Moreover, the elementary properties of the coating, including pencil hardness, adhesive strength, water resistance, salt, and alkali resistance met the code requirement. The photocatalytic coating exhibited favorable reusability and durability, as shown by the reusability and exposure test.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of highway transportation and urban construction in the world, vehicle exhaust (VE) has gradually become the main source of air pollution in the world [1,2,3]. During recent decades, with the control of policies, the emission of air pollution in the world was considerably reduced [4,5]; however, the concentration of air pollutants is still high, especially in traffic-intensive urban areas [6,7,8,9]. At the same time, hazardous substances, such as CO, CO2, NOx, HC and other components in the VE cause haze and photochemical smog, both of which seriously damage human health [10,11,12,13,14].
At present, the methods commonly used to degrade VE mainly include physical adsorption [15], catalytic degradation [16,17,18,19], and soil VE purification [20,21]. Because of the chemical and thermal stability, high refractive index, nontoxicity, and wide band gap energy of TiO2 [22,23,24], it has been used as one kind of light harvester in the areas of air purification, water treatment, and deodorization [13]. Moreover, TiO2 was adopted as a photocatalytic material to purify VE in the areas of ceramics, concrete, and pavement [16,17]. In 1999, TiO2 was first used in cement pavement to degrade NOx discharged from automobiles in Japan, and the results showed that TiO2 could purify NOx in VE [19]. Leng and Yu [9] coated TiO2 particles on an asphalt pavement surface to purify NOx in VE, and the durability of coating was evaluated. It is worth mentioning that in most of the above studies, TiO2 particles were incorporated into the asphalt and cement concretes to achieve efficient degradation of VE. However, this method is only applicable to new sections of road and buildings, not to existing sections. Therefore, its scope of application is limited.
As a kind of functional material, photocatalytic coatings have the advantages of simple construction, low cost, wide application, and high photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. Xu et al. [25] prepared a photocatalytic coating using an anti-corrosion coating with TiO2 and found that it had the effect of degrading Pirola et al. [26] prepared composite photocatalytic materials based four different matrix materials and coated them on the exterior walls of buildings. The degradation ability of silicate photocatalysts after one year is lower than that of siloxane photocatalysts. Martinez et al. [27] reported NO degradation properties with a polymer coating carrying TiO2 nanoparticles. However, few studies have reported the application of photocatalytic coatings in some special environments, such as tunnels with high VE concentration and weak internal light intensity [28].
Gallus et al. [29] reported three different methods to quantify the ability of photocatalytic coatings to degrade tunnel pollutants. Coating degradation efficiency was measured before or after application, upwind or downwind of the test section, and with UV lamps on or off. Guerrini [30] found that the concentration of NOx in the same position decreased by more than 50% compared with that before and after coating. This study demonstrates the feasibility of photocatalytic coatings used to degrade exhaust gas in tunnels. However, an ultraviolet light source was used as the excitation source in the above studies of tunnels; in fact, only visible light is available in tunnels at present. Therefore, the degradation effect and performance of the photocatalytic coatings need to be further studied.
The main objective of this research was to develop a photocatalytic waterborne coating which can degrade VE effectively under visible light, so the performance of photocatalytic coating was characterized. In this study, the visible light responsive Fe/N/Co–TiO2 photocatalyst was prepared by the sol-gel method. The effect of doping elements on crystal structure and photocatalytic ability was studied. A visible-light-responsive and durable photocatalytic coating was constructed by using acrylic acid waterborne emulsion as the coating substrate; Fe/N/Co–TiO2 nanoparticles as photocatalytic components; and water, pigments, and fillers as additives. The photocatalytic performance of the coating under ultraviolet and visible light was characterized by self-made degradation test chamber. The reusability of VE degradation was studied by cyclic degradation test and durability test.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Titanium (IV) butoxide (TBOT, 99%) was purchased from Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Absolute ethanol (99%) and ammonia solution (NH4OH, 28%) was purchased from Tianjin Fuyu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Nitric acid (HNO3, 65%) was purchased from Chengdu Kelon Chemical Reagent Factory (Chengdu, China). Ferric nitrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, 98%) and cobalt nitrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O, 99%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Urea (99%) was purchased from Tianjin Fuchen Chemical Reagent Factory (Tianjin, China). Sodium hydroxymethyl cellulose (99%), hexametaphosphate (99%), talcum powder (99%), and barium sulfate (99%) were purchased from Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Research Institute (Tianjin, China). Rutile titanium dioxide (94%) was purchased from Shanghai Coking Group Titanium Dioxide Factory (Shanghai, China). Acrylic emulsion was purchased from Guangzhou Rongdong Chemical Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China).

2.2. Preparation of Fe/N/Co–TiO2

Fe/N/Co–TiO2 catalyst samples were synthesized using the sol-gel method. Specific steps are as follows:
Firstly, 140 mL anhydrous ethanol was blended with 10 mL glacial acetic acid in a 500 mL glass beaker at room temperature. Then, 30 mL of TBOT was slowly added while stirring was continued for 20 min.
Secondly, the pH of the above mixture was adjusted to 2 by adding 3 mL nitric acid; after that, 60 mL of deionized water was added. The modified TiO2 sol was prepared by adding 1.527 g of Fe(NO3)3, 2.574 g of CO(NH2)2, and 2.502 g of Co(NO3)2, and stirring at a high speed for 30 min. The sol was aged for 3 days at room temperature to prepare gel.
Thirdly, the prepared sol was added to the flask and placed in a rotary evaporator to evaporate the solvent completely. The solid gel was dried in a blast drying oven at 100 °C to obtain a dry gel, and then it was ground into powder.
Finally, the prepared powder was calcined at different calcination temperatures (550 °C, 600 °C, and 650 °C) for 2 h in the muffle furnace to obtain Fe/N/Co–TiO2.
According to the above method, Fe–TiO2 was synthesized by adding an appropriate amount of Fe(NO3)3. Fe/N–TiO2 was synthesized by adding appropriate amount of Fe(NO3)3 and CO(NH2)2 in the preparation of modified sol. TiO2 was synthesized by the same preparation method without doping.

2.3. Preparation of the Photocatalytic Coating

Firstly, 0.5 g of sodium carboxymethylcellulose was dispersed in 25 mL water to form an aqueous solution. After adding 10 g of Fe/N/Co–TiO2, 10 g of rutile TiO2, 2.5 g of BaSO4, 2.5 g of talcum powder, and 0.5 g of hexametaphoshate, the paint disperser, were used for dispersion for 1 h at 30 rpm. The mixture was called liquid A. Secondly, 40 g waterborne acrylic emulsion was blended with 5 g of 2,2,4-trimethyl 1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate, and the pH of mixture was adjusted to 7–8 by adding aqueous ammonia solution; the above mixture was named liquid B. Thirdly, the coating was prepared by mixing liquids A and B with a small amount of defoamer and a leveling agent at 18 rpm for 0.5 h continuously. Finally, the coating was screened by a 200 mesh screen, then coated on the surface of q non-cotton fiber cement board (150 mm × 70 mm), and dried at room temperature.

2.4. Characterization

Colloidal particle sizes of samples were detected by Zetasizer nanoparticle size analyzer (Malvern Zetasizer Nano, Malvern, UK). The crystalline phases of samples were identified by X-ray diffraction analysis (Bruker AS, Inc., D8ADVANCE, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu-Kα operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. The scan rate was 0.2°/s and in the range of 15°–80°.The morphology of sample was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with a test voltage of 200 kV. The TEM samples were prepared by sonication of the photocatalyst powders in ethanol for 15 min, and subsequently, dropping the dispersion onto carbon copper grids. The chemical bonding state of samples was measured by XPS (AXIS ULTRA, KRATOS, Manchester, UK) with a monochromatic Al-Kα X-ray source (KE = 1486.6 eV, 150 W). All XPS spectra were corrected by the C1s peak of external hydrocarbon contamination located at 284.8 eV. The UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra were measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometer equipped with an integrated sphere (UV 3600, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The reference material of the sample was BaSO4 and the test wavelength range was 200–800 nm.

2.5. Photocatalytic Degradation Experiment

The photocatalytic performances of Fe, Fe/N, and Fe/N/Co–TiO2 were measured by the degradation of methylene blue (MB) and VE. The photocatalytic performance of the coating was measured by VE degradation experiment.

2.5.1. The Photocatalytic Degradation Experiment with MB

Firstly, 100 mg of the prepared catalyst was added to 100 mL of a 10 mg/L MB solution in a 250 mL double-layered beaker, which could be passed into cooling water to maintain the reaction temperature. The mixture was stirred in the dark for 30 min to adsorb MB. Next, photocatalytic degradation was initiated by turning on a 300 W xenon lamp that filtered out ultraviolet rays. In total, 3 mL of the reaction solution was placed in a centrifuge tube, and centrifuged for 8 min at 3000 rpm. The upper supernatant was separated and the data of MB absorbance were recorded by UV spectrometer at a wavelength (λ) of 650 nm. The degree of MB absorbance decrease was regarded as the evaluation index of photocatalytic degradation ability, which was calculated by Equation (1).
η   =   C 0   −   C C 0   ×   100 %   =   A 0   −   A A 0   ×   100 %
where η is the degradation efficiency of MB, C0 is the initial concentration of MB, and C is the residual concentration after photocatalytic reaction.

2.5.2. The Photocatalytic Degradation Experiment of VE

The photocatalytic degradation experiment of VE was carried out by a self-made photocatalytic VE reaction chamber (Figure 1) at room temperature. The VE was from a professional preparation of Jining Xieli Special Gas Co., Ltd. (Xi’an, China) The reaction chamber was made of plexiglass, equipped with fans for dispersing gases, ultraviolet and visible light sources, and a platform for loading samples. The air tightness of the reaction chamber was ensured during the experiment, otherwise the experimental results would have been affected. The NHA-506 VE analyzer manufactured by Nantong Huapeng Electronics Co., Ltd. (Nantong, China) was used in the experiment. To ensure the accuracy of the experimental results, test errors of VE reaction chamber and VE analyzer were calibrated.
Firstly, 2.0 g of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 was evenly distributed in ethanol, and the above dispersions were placed in four, 95 mm Petri dishes and dried in an oven. Next, the prepared Fe/N/Co–TiO2 or coating sample plate (8 pieces) was placed in the reaction chamber. The reaction chamber was sealed with a sealed cover and shielded it to avoid the Fe/N/Co–TiO2 or coating being irradiated by external light source. Leakage detection was performed before VE was introduced into the closed reactor. Subsequently, VE was introduced until the desired concentration was reached and the fan was turned on to disperse the gas evenly. Finally, UV or a visible light source in the reaction chamber was turned on, and the concentration of each component (including CO, CO2, and NOx) was recorded every 20 min by NHA-506 VE analyzer. The photocatalytic degradation abilities of the samples were evaluated by the degradation rates of VE’s concentration in the reaction chamber. The formula used was the same as that of Equation (1).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Crystal Structures and Optical Properties of the Photocatalysts

3.1.1. The Effect of Doping Elements on Colloidal Particle Size

To investigate the effect of element species on the particle size distribution of colloidal Fe/N/Co–TiO2, modified TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) doped with different elements were prepared, and their particle size distributions are shown in Figure 2. Compared with the TiO2 colloid, the particle size distributions of Fe–TiO2, Fe/N–TiO2, and Fe/N/Co–TiO2 colloids became narrow; the average particle sizes of sols were 11.15, 9.56, and 10.64 nm, respectively, as shown in Table 1.
These phenomena may be related to Brownian motion [31]. When a certain amount of Fe3+ is incorporated into the TiO2 colloid, the replacement of Ti4+ by Fe3+ makes the Fe–TiO2 colloid negatively charged. The Fe–TiO2 colloids with the same charge have a repulsion effect, so the colloids are unlikely to coagulate and the particle size becomes smaller [32]. N was adopted as a non-metallic element to provide more negative charge, thus making the particle size smaller [33]. Since the doping of Co2+ breaks the charge balance again, the colloidal motion is intensified, and the colloidal particle size is increased.

3.1.2. The Effect of Doping Elements on UV-Vis

To investigate the effect of elemental species on the optical absorption ability of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 NPs, the optical absorption properties of doped TiO2 were characterized by UV-Vis spectra. In reference to Figure 3a, it can be seen that: (i) The doping made the absorption range extend to the visible light region. (ii) The absorption intensity of doped TiO2 in the ultraviolet light and visible light regions increased obviously compared with un-doped TiO2. (iii) The Fe/N/Co–TiO2 showed the most obvious red shift of absorption edge and highest absorption intensity among the doped TiO2 NPs in the visible region. Furthermore, the band gap values of TiO2, Fe–TiO2, Fe/N–TiO2, and Fe/N/Co–TiO2 NPs were 3.2, 2.6, 2.3, and 2.1 eV estimated by Kubelka–Munk function (c.f. Figure 3b). This indicates that the band gap width decreases significantly after doping, which is more conducive to improving the visible light response’s efficiency. It can be concluded that tri-doping plays an important synergistic role in the absorption of TiO2 in the visible region [34].
The expansion of Fe–TiO2 adsorption under visible light comes from the electronic transition from the dopant energy level (Fe3+/Fe4+) to the conduction band of TiO2 [35,36,37]. However, the mechanisms of photoexcitation changes induced by doping with Fe or N are different. The TiO2 band gap narrowing is induced by the localized N 2p states (acceptor states) positioned above the TiO2 valence band when N is incorporated in TiO2 lattice [38]. The charge separation is promoted, so the band gap is further reduced. Therefore, Fe/N–TiO2 can be activated with much longer wavelengths than Fe–TiO2 [39]. It is reported that the substitution of Co2+ to Ti4+ in TiO2 crystals causes lattice defects and breaks the electron and hole motion states [40], which may arise from charge transfer and d–d transitions [41], leading to a further red shift. Thereby, the photoactivity of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 is further improved by tri-doping and exhibits more excellence in the visible region.

3.1.3. The Effect of Calcination Temperature on XRD of Fe/N/Co–TiO2

To investigate the effect of calcination temperature on the crystal structure, the XRD pattern of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 at different calcination temperatures were measured. Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 at different calcination temperatures. The typical anatase TiO2 patterns appear at 2θ of 25.3°, 37.8°, 48.0°, 53.9°, and 62.68°, and rutile TiO2 appears at 2θ of 27.4° and 36.1°. After calcination at 550 °C, the crystal form of undoped TiO2 is a mixture of anatase and rutile. However, Fe/N/Co–TiO2 is anatase, there is no rutile. This is because the doping of Fe and N inhibits the growth of crystallite, and the transition from anatase to rutile is prevented, transition temperature increased [42,43].
The diffraction peak of anatase of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 became sharper as the calcination temperature increased, and the rutile peaks appeared when the calcination temperature reached 650 °C. It is also indicated that with the increase of calcination temperature, the grain growth and crystallinity increase [44]. When the calcination temperature was further increased to 650 °C, a small portion of anatase in Fe/N/Co–TiO2 began to be converted into a more stable rutile, which implied that the rutile transition temperature of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 is between 600 and 650 °C.

3.1.4. The Effect of Calcination Temperature on the UV-Vis of Fe/N/Co–TiO2

Figure 5 shows the UV-Vis of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 prepared at different calcination temperatures. It was found that the UV-Vis spectra of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 prepared at 550 and 600 °C were almost the same. This is because the crystal morphology of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 anatase was improved, and the grain size increased with the increase of calcination temperature from 550 to 600 °C. Actually, perfect crystal form contributes to the increase of light absorption intensity, while coarse grain size inhibits the absorption and utilization of light by photocatalysts. Therefore, the absorbances of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 calcined at 550 and 600 °C are basically the same under the above two effects.
When the calcination temperature reaches 650 °C, the absorptive strength of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 in the visible region is considerably improved, while the absorptive strength in the ultraviolet region is a fair amount lower than that after calcined at 550 and 600 °C. This phenomenon may be caused by a transformation between crystal forms. Some anatase is transformed into rutile, and rutile can be excited by light of a larger wavelength range than anatase to produce photoelectrons, but anatase has both higher light absorption and photocatalytic activity than rutile [45].

3.1.5. TEM of Fe/N/Co–TiO2

Figure 6 shows the TEM images of the Fe/N/Co–TiO2. It can be seen that the particle size of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 ranges from 50 to 200 nm, and there is a certain degree of agglomeration (Figure 6a). According to the HR-TEM of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 displayed in Figure 6a, the d-spacing was 0.351 nm, which corresponds to the (101) lattice planes of anatase TiO2 [46]. Moreover, the SAED (inset) images in Figure 6b indicate the single-crystalline characteristics, which confirm that the results are consistent with XRD measurements.

3.1.6. XPS Spectra of Fe/N/Co–TiO2

The chemical compositions of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 were further studied by XPS of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 and TiO2 NPs, as shown in Figure 7. The XPS of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 mainly contained Ti, O, C, and other elements (Figure 7a). Among them, C 1s detected by 284.8 eV was caused by organic pollutants remaining during the preparation process [47]. Ti shows a strong peak position at 458.7 and 464.5 eV, as shown in Figure 7b. The two characteristic peaks correspond to Ti2p3/2 and Ti2p1/2, respectively. The position where the peak of Ti in Fe/N/Co–TiO2 appears with smaller shift and is deviated by 0.2 eV, showing higher photocatalytic activity, which is consistent with the results of UV test. The characteristic peaks of O 1s are asymmetrical according to Figure 7c. There are 530.0 and 532.2 eV peaks in Fe/N/Co–TiO2, and 529.9 and 531.7 eV peaks in TiO2. The peak of O 1s at 529.9 and 530.0 eV could be attributed to the O2− anions of the TiO2 crystalline lattice. 532.2 and 531.7 eV is the hydroxyl oxygen peak of –OH on the surface of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 and TiO2 [48]. The presence of surface –OH indicates that the Fe/N/Co–TiO2 has catalytic degradation ability. This is because TiO2 is an n-type semiconductor. When it is illuminated, the valence band electrons gain energy and jump to the conduction band to form photogenerated electrons; at the same time, holes are formed in the valence band. The –OH on the surface of TiO2 are easily oxidized into –OH by holes, and the –OHs have extremely strong oxidation capacity, which can oxidize inorganic substances or most organic substances into inorganic small molecules, CO2 and H2O [48]. Compared with undoped TiO2, the –OH peak of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 was stronger, and it may be inferred that it has more excellent photocatalytic degradation.
Figure 7d shows the Fe 2p spectra of Fe/N/Co–TiO2. The two peaks of 711.8 and 725.0 eV appeared after the peak-fit processing of Fe 2p spectra, which correspond to Fe2p3/2 and Fe2p1/2, indicating that Fe exists in the +3 valence state. In combination with the above XRD, there was no peak of Fe2O3, and the ionic radius (0.64 Å) of Fe3+ was similar to that of Ti4+ (0.68 Å) [49], so it was concluded that Fe3+ was successfully incorporated into the crystal lattice and formed Fe–O–Ti bonds. The XPS pattern fitting of N 1s found that only one characteristic peak appeared 397.0 eV (Figure 7e), indicating that O in a large number of N substituted TiO2 lattices forms Ti–N bonds [50]. There are 781.4, 786.2, and 796.7 eV peak positions after the peak-fit processing of Co 2p spectra as can be seen in Figure 7f. Among them, the peak at 781.4 and 796.7 eV correspond to Co2p3/2 and Co2p1/2 of Co3+ respectively. The peak at 786.2 eV corresponds to Co2+, and the peak of CoO at 780.0 eV did not appear [51,52], indicating that Co3+ and Co2+ coexist in Fe/N/Co–TiO2 and parts of Co replace Ti in the doped TiO2 lattice.

3.2. The Photocatalytic Degradation Ability of the Photocatalyst

3.2.1. The Photocatalytic Degradation Performance of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 on MB

In order to determine the photocatalytic activity of doped-TiO2 prepared above, the MB solution was adopted and the results are shown in Figure 8. After 120 min of irradiation, Fe/N/Co–TiO2 exhibited the highest catalytic degradation rate, which was 85%, followed by Fe/N–TiO2 and Fe–TiO2, and finally, TiO2. The main reasons for the improvement of photocatalytic performance may be as follows: (i) Metal/nonmetal doping improves the visible light absorption intensity of TiO2 [42]. (ii) The specific surface area of TiO2 grain may increase, the MB molecules are more easily adsorbed on the surface, and the contact area is increased, thereby the degradation rate increases [43,53].

3.2.2. The Photocatalytic Degradation Performance of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 on VE

Figure 9 shows the photocatalytic degradation of three components in VE by Fe/N/Co–TiO2 under visible light. As can be seen from Figure 9a, the concentration of NOx decreased rapidly in the first half hour. After that, the concentration decline slowed down gradually. After 2 h, the concentration of NOx was about 4 ppm, and the degradation efficiency was 71.04%. NOx concentration decreased very slowly in the last 1 h. At the same time, the degradation efficiencies of CO and CO2 remained almost unchanged, as depicted in the Figure 9b. Therefore, the late degradation of VE was carried out according to the irradiation time of 2 h. The decline of degradation performance may be due to the nitric acid and nitrates produced by oxidation of NOx covered with a doped-TiO2 surface [54]. The effective contact area between the exhaust gas and the photocatalyst was reduced. The increase in the CO2 concentration of the inflection point in Figure 9b may be caused by the oxidation of part of CO to CO2 [55].

3.3. The Elementary and Photocatalytic Performance of Photocatalytic Coating

3.3.1. The Elementary Performance of Photocatalytic Coating

In order to ensure the effective use of photocatalytic coatings, the elementary properties of the coatings were determined according to JG/T 512-2017 (General Technical Requirements for Building Exterior Wall Coatings) first. Test results are shown in the Table 2. It was found that the elementary properties of the coating met the code requirement (JG/T 512-2017), and the resistances to water, salt, and alkali were good.
The durability of the coating can be evaluated by accelerated weather aging test (1000 h). To ensure test accuracy, three coated cotton-free fiber cement boards (labeled A, B, and C) were tested simultaneously; the results are shown in Table 3. After 6 weeks of exposure, the aging degree of the three samples can be neglected. The evaluation grade was Level 1, indicating that the photocatalytic coating meets code and construction requirements. The slight pulverization of the surface is mainly due to the photocatalytic degradation effect of the photocatalyst, which degrades the organic matter of the coating.

3.3.2. The Photocatalytic Degradation Performance of the Coating on VE

The photocatalytic degradation performance of the coating under different illumination conditions was studied, as shown in Figure 10. The degradation rates of NOX, CO, and CO2 under visible light were 67.39%, 25.20%, and 27.54%, respectively. In contrast, under ultraviolet irradiation, the degradation efficiencies were higher, 79.39%, 28.20%, and 34.54%, respectively. This phenomenon may be due to that the absorption intensity exhibited Fe/N/Co–TiO2 in the ultraviolet region was higher than that of visible light (according to the UV-Vis results above). Furthermore, the energy of ultraviolet light is higher than that of visible light, and it is easier to generate more photoelectrons for photocatalytic reaction when Fe/N/Co–TiO2 is irradiated [56]. It is obvious that photocatalytic coating is effective at degrading the main harmful gas in VE under visible light irradiation. At the same time, the higher degradation efficiency of the photocatalytic coating is related to the network structure of the acrylic substrate, which can effectively avoid the agglomeration of doped TiO2 NPs [57,58].

3.3.3. Reusability of the Photocatalytic Degradation

Reusability is an important indicator to evaluate the performance of photocatalytic coatings. Considering that photocatalytic coatings need to be cleaned frequently in practical use, some photocatalysts may lose their activity after repeated cleaning, resulting in the reduction of photocatalytic efficiency, so the influence of rinsing times on photocatalytic properties of coatings was investigated. The specific experimental process was as follows: firstly, a VE degradation test was carried out; after that, the coating was rinsed with tap water for 1 min to ensure that the surface of the coating was clean, then dry, at room temperature. The experiments were repeated ten times and the VE degradation test results were recorded (Figure 11).
It was found that with an increase in washing times, the degradation efficiency decreased first and then tended to be stable after four cycles. The degradation efficiencies of NOx, CO, and CO2 were slightly reduced between the first and fourth cycles. The decrease of degradation efficiency may be mainly attributed to two aspects. Firstly, with the prolongation of exposure time, as a small part of the effective photocatalytic material on the surface falls off. Secondly, during the rinsing process, a small amount of hydrophilic or water-soluble substances are not completely washed out, and remain in the pits and channels on the surface of the coating, which affects the adsorption of the coating to VE. However, after four cycles, the degradation rates of NOx, CO, and CO2 remained stable, demonstrating good reusability of the coating. This may be due to the confinement effect of the acrylic emulsion on doped TiO2, which does not change the dispersion state of the doped TiO2 on the surface of the coating during the scouring process [59].

3.3.4. Durability of the Photocatalytic Coating

Durability is an important index for long-term use of coatings. It can be evaluated by the exposure test. Firstly, the photocatalytic coating was coated on the surface of the cement boards, and then the cement boards were exposed to sunlight. It was stipulated that the test site is roof, and the test day had to be sunny. Finally, VE degradation performance was measured every two weeks; test results are shown in Figure 12.
As shown in Figure 12, it can be seen that the photocatalytic coating showed a slight decrease in photocatalytic activity after natural exposure. The degradation rates of the coating on NOx, CO and, CO2 decreased by 3.7%, 7.5%, and 0.55% respectively, after 12 weeks. The main reason for this phenomenon may be that during the exposure test, the Fe/N/Co–TiO2 has a slight degradation effect on waterborne, acrylic substrate, resulting in a slight smashing of the surface of the coating and a small amount of photocatalyst falling off. In addition, the adsorbate on the surface of the coating may also cover the surface of the photocatalyst to affect its contact with VE [60]. However, due to the crosslinked structure of the coating and confinement effect on doped TiO2, most photocatalysts still adhere to the surface/interior of the coating, showing excellent durability and can meet the requirements of normal use.

4. Conclusions

In this study, visible light responsive Fe/N/Co–TiO2 nanoparticles with good photocatalytic activity were prepared. The effects of Fe, N, and Co doping on the crystal size, micro-structure, and photocatalytic performance of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 were investigated. The degradation rates of NOX, CO, and CO2 in VE under visible light reached 71.43%, 23.79%, and 21.09%, respectively. Then, a visible-light-responsive and durable photocatalytic coating was constructed for degrading harmful gas in the VE by loading Fe/N/Co–TiO2 particles into the waterborne acrylic coating. The coating exhibited efficient performance of visible light degradation for VE, and the degradation rates of NOX, CO, and CO2 reached 67.39%, 25.20%, and 27.54%. Furthermore, the photocatalytic coating exhibited favorable reusability and durability, due to the crosslinked structure in the coating and the confinement effect on doped TiO2. It is believed that this study provides an efficient and simple method for the purification of VE in some special environments (such as tunnels) that only have visible light.

Author Contributions

H.X. and L.S. conceived and designed the experiments; G.L. and R.Z. participated in the experiments and measurements; L.S. and H.C. participated in the discussion of the results; H.X. and G.L. drafted the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51202016), the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, Chang’an University (grant number 3001102319501), the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (grant number 2017JQ2025), and the Xi’an Science and Technology Planning Project (grant number 2017137SF/WM031).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zheng, Z.; Du, Z.; Yan, Q.; Xiang, Q. The impact of Rhythm-Based visual reference system in long highway tunnels. Saf. Sci. 2016, 95, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Keyte, I.; Albinet, A.; Harrison, R. On-Road traffic emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their Oxy- and Nitro-Derivative compounds measured in road tunnel environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 566, 1131–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, F.; Gao, Y.; Zhong, K.; Kang, Y. Impacts of Cross-Ventilation on the air quality in street canyons with different building arrangements. Build. Environ. 2016, 104, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lackovičová, A.; Guttová, A.; Bačkor, M.; Pišút, P.; Pišút, I. Response of Evernia prunastri to urban environmental conditions in Central Europe after the decrease of air pollution. Lichenologist 2013, 45, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lacressonnière, G.; Watson, L.; Gauss, M.; Engardt, M.; Andersson, C.; Beekmann, M.; Colette, A.; Foret, G.; Josse, B.; Marecal, V.; et al. Particulate matter air pollution in Europe in a +2 °C warming world. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 154, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guerreiro, C.; Foltescu, V.; De, L. Air quality status and trends in Europe. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 98, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. Urban and transport planning, environmental exposures and Health-New concepts, methods and tools to improve health in cities. Environ. Health 2016, 15, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stefania, S.; Marta, C.; Elena, I.; Flavia, V.; Hopke, P.; Rammpazzo, G. Urban air quality in a Mid-Size City-PM2.5 composition, sources and identification of impact areas: From local to long range contributions. Atmos. Res. 2017, 186, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leng, Z.; Yu, H. Novel method of coating titanium dioxide on to asphalt mixture based on the breath figure process for air-purifying purpose. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2015, 28, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Franklin, M.; Vora, H.; Avol, E.; McConnelll, R.; Lurmann, F.; Liu, F.; Penfold, B.; Berhane, K.; Gilliland, F.; Gauderman, W. Predictors of intra-community variation in air quality. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2012, 22, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, X.; Hu, T.; Wang, K. Research on motor vehicle exhaust pollution monitoring technology. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 620, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, Y.; Gao, P.; Yang, W.; Ni, H. Vehicle exhaust: An overstated cause of haze in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 490–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Carneiro, J.; Teixeira, V.; Azevedo, S.; Neves, J. Development of photocatalytic ceramic materials through the deposition of TiO2 nanoparticles layers. J. Nano Res. 2012, 18, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gauderman, W.; Mcconnell, R.; Gilliland, F.; London, S.; Thomas, D.; Avol, R.; Vora, H.; Berhane, K.; Rappaport, T.; Lurmann, F.; et al. Association between air pollution and lung function growth in southern California children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000, 166, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tang, Y.; John, C.; Eric, G. Agglomerated Activated Carbon Air Filter. U.S. Patent 5332426, 26 July 1994. [Google Scholar]
  16. Laura, B.; Ilaria, A.; Andrea, L.; Giovanni, P.; Germana, B.; Giadad, G.; Paolo, M.; Simona, R.; Danilo, B.; Pier, P. Nanocrystalline TiO2 coatings by Sol-Gel: Photocatalytic activity on Pietra di Noto biocalcarenite. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2015, 75, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, W.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Fan, J. Photocatalytic degradation of vehicle exhausts on asphalt pavement by TiO2/rubber composite structure. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 81, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Snapkauskienė, V.; Valinčius, V.; Grigaitienė, V. Preparation and characterization of TiO2-Based Plasma-Sprayed coatings for NOₓ abatement. Catal. Today 2012, 191, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fujishima, A.; Hashimoto, K.; Watanabe, T. TiO2 Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Applications; BKC: Bombay, India, 1999; Volume 35, pp. 1137–1138. ISBN 4-939051-03-X. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nelson, M.; Bohn, H. Soil-Based biofiltration for air purification: Potentials for environmental and space lifesupport application. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2011, 2, 1084–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, W.; Weng, X.; Wu, K.; Chen, G.; Zheng, G.; Wu, Z. Exploration of air pollutant purification technology for urban road tunnels. Mod. Tunn. Tec. 2014, 51, 41–48. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vinodkumar, E.; Cristiana, D.; Jenny, S.; Detlef, B.; Suresh, C. Visible-Light activation of TiO2 photocatalysts: Advances in theory and experiments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C-Photochem. Rev. 2015, 25, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Scanlon, D.; Dunnill, C.; Buckeridge, J.; Shevlin, S.; Logsdail, S.; Woodley, S.; Catlow, C.; Powell, M.; Palgrave, R.; Parkin, I.; et al. Band alignment of rutile and anatase TiO2. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 798–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shi, H.; Magaye, R.; Castranova, V.; Zhao, J. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: A review of current toxicological data. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2013, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, H.; Liu, L.; Sun, L. Research on the application of photocatalytic coating material with function of decomposing vehicle exhaust on road collision wall. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 356–360, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pirola, C.; Boffito, D.; Vitali, S. Photocatalytic coatings for building industry: Study of 1 year of activity in the NOx degradation. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2012, 9, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martinez, T.; Bertron, A.; Escadeillas, G.; Ringot, E.; Simon, V. BTEX abatement by photocatalytic TiO2-bearing coatings applied to cement mortars. Build. Environ. 2014, 71, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kanda, I.; Uehara, K.; Yamao, Y.; Yoshikawa, Y.; Morikawa, T. A Wind-Tunnel study on Exhaust-Gas dispersion from road Vehicles-Part II: Effect of vehicle queues. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2006, 94, 659–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gallusa, M.; Akylas, V.; Barmpas, F.; Beeldens, A.; Boonen, E.; Boreave, A.; Cazaunau, M.; Chen, H.; Daele, V.; Doussin, J.; et al. Photocatalytic De-Pollution in the Leopold II tunnel in Brussels: NOx abatement results. Build. Environ. 2015, 84, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guerrini, G. Photocatalytic performances in a city tunnel in Rome: NOx monitoring results. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 27, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Torres-Carbajal, A.; Herrera-Velarde, S.; Castañeda-Priego, R. Brownian motion of a Nano-Colloidal particle: The role of the solvent. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 19557–19568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dai, W.; Chen, X.; Li, E.; Li, E.; Wang, X.; Liu, P.; Fu, X. Influence of pH value of TiO2 sol on surface gloss of corresponding TiO2 film coated on ceramic tiles. Surf. Eng. 2009, 25, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lai, L.; Wu, J. A facile solution approach to W, N Co-Doped TiO2 nanobelt thin films with high photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015, 3, 15863–15868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Phung, H.; Van, N.; Phuong, A.; Hung, V.; Nguyen, D. Effect of Co-Doping and Tri-Doping with transition metals and a nonmetal on photocatalytic activity in visible light of TiO2 thin film. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2017, 70, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fàbrega, C.; Andreu, T.; Cabot, A.; Morante, J. Location and catalytic role of iron species in TiO2: Fe photocatalysts: An EPR study. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2010, 211, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Foura, G.; Chouchou, N.; Soualah, A.; Kouachi, K.; Guidotti, M.; Robert, D. Fe-doped TiO2 supported on HY zeolite for solar photocatalytic treatment of dye pollutants. Catalysts 2017, 7, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tong, T.; Zhang, J.; Tian, B.; Chen, F.; He, D. Preparation of Fe3+-doped TiO2 catalysts by controlled hydrolysis of titanium alkoxide and study on their photocatalytic activity for methyl orange degradation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 155, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, K.; Ying, D.; Huang, B. Study of the nitrogen concentration influence on N-Doped TiO2 anatase from First-Principles calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007, 111, 12086–12090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dolat, D.; Mozia, S.; Ohtani, B.; Morawski, A. Nitrogen, Iron-Single modified (N-TiO2, Fe-TiO2) and Co-Modified (Fe,N-TiO2) rutile titanium dioxide as Visible-Light active photocatalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 225, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. AltıN, İ.; Sökmen, M.; Bıyıklıoğlu, Z. Sol gel synthesis of cobalt doped TiO2 and its dye sensitization for efficient pollutant removal. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2016, 45, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dvoranová, D.; Brezová, V.; Mazúr, M.; Malati, M. Investigations of metal-doped titanium dioxide photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 37, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cheng, X.; Yu, X.; Xing, Z. One-Step synthesis of Fe–N–S-Tri-Doped TiO2 catalyst and its enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Mater. Res. Bull. 2012, 47, 3804–3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, T.; Glez, V.; Gyawali, G.; Cho, S. Synthesis of solar light responsive Fe, N Co-Doped TiO2 photocatalyst by sonochemical method. Catal. Today 2013, 212, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cheng, Y.; Luo, F.; Jiang, Y.; Li, F.; Wei, C. The effect of calcination temperature on the structure and activity of TiO2/SiO2, composite catalysts derived from titanium sulfate and fly ash acid sludge. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 554, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, H.; Sun, C.; Qiao, S.; Zou, J.; Liu, G.; Smith, S.; Cheng, H.; Lu, M. Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets. Nature 2008, 453, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chowdhury, I.; Ghosh, S.; Naskar, M. Aqueous-Based Synthesis of Mesoporous TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 Nanopowders for Efficient Photodegradation of Methylene Blue. Ceram. Int. 2015, 42, 2488–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tian, B.; Li, C.; Zhang, J. One-Step preparation, characterization and Visible-Light photocatalytic activity of Cr-Doped TiO2 with anatase and rutile bicrystalline phases. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 191, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Park, J.; Kim, S.; Bard, A. Novel Carbon-Doped TiO2 nanotube arrays with high aspect ratios for efficient solar water splitting. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pei, F.; Liu, Y.; Xu, S.; Lu, J.; Wang, C.; Cao, S. Nanocomposite of graphene oxide with nitrogen-doped TiO2 exhibiting enhanced photocatalytic efficiency for hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 2670–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, A.; Long, L.; Liu, C.; Li, W.; Yu, H. Chemical recycling of the waste anodic electrolyte from the TiO2 nanotube preparation process to synthesize Facet-Controlled TiO2 single crystals as an efficient photocatalyst. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tursun, R.; Su, Y.; Yu, Q.; Tan, J.; Hu, T.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, J. Effect of doping on the structural, magnetic, and ferroelectric properties of Ni1-xAxTiO3 (A  =  Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn; x  =  0, 0.05, and 0.1). J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 773, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, X.; He, B.; Fu, B. Effects of doping cobalt on the structures and performances of TiO2 photocatalyst. Acta Chim. Sin. 2008, 14, 1725–1730. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Du, Y.; Zheng, P. Adsorption and photodegradation of methylene blue on TiO2-Halloysite adsorbents. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 31, 2051–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ma, J.; Wu, H.; Liu, Y.; He, H. Photocatalytic removal of NOx over visible light responsive Oxygen-Deficient TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 7434–7441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhu, H.; Qin, Z.; Shan, W.; Shen, W.; Wang, J. Pd/CeO2–TiO2 catalyst for CO oxidation at low temperature: A TPR study with H2 and CO as reducing agents. J. Catal. 2004, 225, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, H.; Liu, J.; Qian, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, J. Preparation of Bi-Doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their visible light photocatalytic performance. Chin. J. Catal. 2014, 35, 1578–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wan, T. Study on Titanium Dioxide-Polyacrylate Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Materials; Sichuan University of China: Chengdu, China, 2006. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, J.; Hong, X. Structure and properties of Nano-SiO2/acrylic composite emulsion with interpenetrating networks prepared via Soap-Free rmulsion polymerization. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2010, 31, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Clement, J.; Alexandra, L.; Lisa, E.; Neil, C.; Richard, L.; Maria, C. Effect of weathering and traffic exposure on removal of nitrogen oxides by photocatalytic coatings on roadside concrete structures. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 3159–3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Du, H. Preparation and Performance of New Materials for Automobile Exhaust Purification in Tunnels; Chang’an University of China: Xi’an, China, 2012. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Materials 12 03378 g001 550
Figure 1. The photocatalytic vehicle exhaust (VE) reaction chamber.
Figure 1. The photocatalytic vehicle exhaust (VE) reaction chamber.
Materials 12 03378 g001
Materials 12 03378 g002 550
Figure 2. The particle size distribution of doped-TiO2 with different doping elements.
Figure 2. The particle size distribution of doped-TiO2 with different doping elements.
Materials 12 03378 g002
Materials 12 03378 g003 550
Figure 3. The UV-Vis absorption (a) and corresponding plot of transformed Kubelka–Munk function pattern (b) of TiO2, Fe, Fe/N, and Fe/N/Co–TiO2 particles after calcination at 650 °C.
Figure 3. The UV-Vis absorption (a) and corresponding plot of transformed Kubelka–Munk function pattern (b) of TiO2, Fe, Fe/N, and Fe/N/Co–TiO2 particles after calcination at 650 °C.
Materials 12 03378 g003
Materials 12 03378 g004 550
Figure 4. The XRD patterns of doped-TiO2 after calcination at different temperatures.
Figure 4. The XRD patterns of doped-TiO2 after calcination at different temperatures.
Materials 12 03378 g004
Materials 12 03378 g005 550
Figure 5. The UV-Vis spectra of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 after calcination at different temperatures.
Figure 5. The UV-Vis spectra of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 after calcination at different temperatures.
Materials 12 03378 g005
Materials 12 03378 g006 550
Figure 6. The HR-TEM (a) and TEM (b) images of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 particles.
Figure 6. The HR-TEM (a) and TEM (b) images of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 particles.
Materials 12 03378 g006
Materials 12 03378 g007 550
Figure 7. The XPS spectra: (a) survey, (b) Ti 2p, (c), O 1s, (d) Fe 2p, (e) N 1s, and (f) Co 2p of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs).
Figure 7. The XPS spectra: (a) survey, (b) Ti 2p, (c), O 1s, (d) Fe 2p, (e) N 1s, and (f) Co 2p of Fe/N/Co–TiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs).
Materials 12 03378 g007
Materials 12 03378 g008 550
Figure 8. Methylene blue (MB) degradation experiment. (a) The variation of MB degradation efficiency with reaction time; (b) degradation rates for MB after 120 min under visible light irradiation.
Figure 8. Methylene blue (MB) degradation experiment. (a) The variation of MB degradation efficiency with reaction time; (b) degradation rates for MB after 120 min under visible light irradiation.
Materials 12 03378 g008
Materials 12 03378 g009 550
Figure 9. The concentrations of NOx, (a) and CO and CO2 (b) during the photocatalytic reaction process, and the photocatalytic degradation rate of VE (c) by doped TiO2 under visible light.
Figure 9. The concentrations of NOx, (a) and CO and CO2 (b) during the photocatalytic reaction process, and the photocatalytic degradation rate of VE (c) by doped TiO2 under visible light.
Materials 12 03378 g009
Materials 12 03378 g010 550
Figure 10. The degradation rate of VE under (a) visible light and (b) ultraviolet light.
Figure 10. The degradation rate of VE under (a) visible light and (b) ultraviolet light.
Materials 12 03378 g010
Materials 12 03378 g011 550
Figure 11. The reusability for VE degradation performance of photocatalytic coating.
Figure 11. The reusability for VE degradation performance of photocatalytic coating.
Materials 12 03378 g011
Materials 12 03378 g012 550
Figure 12. The durability for VE degradation performance of photocatalytic coating.
Figure 12. The durability for VE degradation performance of photocatalytic coating.
Materials 12 03378 g012
Table
Table 1. The colloidal particle size of Fe, Fe/N, and Fe/N/Co–TiO2.
Table 1. The colloidal particle size of Fe, Fe/N, and Fe/N/Co–TiO2.
NumberDoping ElementAverage Particle Size/nmDistribution Coefficient (PDI)
1Undoped36.100.349
2Fe11.150.240
3Fe/N9.560.179
4Fe/N/Co10.640.204
Table
Table 2. Elementary properties and corrosion resistance of photocatalytic coating.
Table 2. Elementary properties and corrosion resistance of photocatalytic coating.
ProjectPencil HardnessAdhesive StrengthWater Resistance (168 h)Salt and Alkali Resistance (168 h)
Coating4H1.15 Gpa (Ⅳ)No abnormality (Ⅱ)No abnormality(Ⅲ)
Table
Table 3. The results of accelerated weather aging test (1000 h) for photocatalytic coating.
Table 3. The results of accelerated weather aging test (1000 h) for photocatalytic coating.
SampleDiscolourationPulverizationCrackingBlisteringDamageEvaluation Grade
A11001/S11
B01001/S11
C11001/S11

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, H.; Liu, G.; Zhang, R.; Song, L.; Chen, H. The Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhausts by an Fe/N/Co–TiO2 Waterborne Coating under Visible Light. Materials 2019, 12, 3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203378

AMA Style

Xia H, Liu G, Zhang R, Song L, Chen H. The Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhausts by an Fe/N/Co–TiO2 Waterborne Coating under Visible Light. Materials. 2019; 12(20):3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Huiyun, Guanyu Liu, Rui Zhang, Lifang Song, and Huaxin Chen. 2019. "The Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhausts by an Fe/N/Co–TiO2 Waterborne Coating under Visible Light" Materials 12, no. 20: 3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203378

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop