Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Low-Cost Ti-35421 Titanium Alloy: Phase Transformation, Bimodal Microstructure, and Combinatorial Mechanical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Modified Fourier–Galerkin Solution for Aerospace Skin-Stiffener Panels Subjected to Interface Force and Mixed Boundary Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 17
10.3390/ma12172793
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Preparation Method of Electrically Conductive Adhesives by Powder Spraying Process

by
Hongyu Dong
1,
Xin Li
1,
Yi Dong
2,
Shaoqing Guo
2,* and
Liangfu Zhao
1,*
1
Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, China
2
College of Environment and Safety, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(17), 2793; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172793
Submission received: 29 July 2019 / Revised: 22 August 2019 / Accepted: 28 August 2019 / Published: 30 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Electronic Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In a conventional electrically conductive adhesive (ECA) preparation process, typical ECAs are made by adding an appropriate amount of electrically conductive fillers, such as silver, into a polymer matrix, such as epoxy resin, to form a uniformly dispersed mixture by mixing and stirring operations. However, during the preparation process, secondary pollution and mass loss are caused by the vigorous mixture process. At the same time, the stirring operation introduces many small and stable bubbles, which affect the electrical conductivity of the ECAs. In light of these problems with the conventional preparation of ECAs, we developed a novel ECA preparation method that employs a powder spraying process: silver flakes are sprayed into the epoxy resin with a certain mass fraction to form formulated pastes. The as-prepared ECAs exhibited excellent properties compared with those prepared by the conventional process. This proves that the powder spraying process is feasible and superior to the conventional process.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The interconnected technology of electronics and photovoltaic manufacturing has been dominated by tin–lead alloy solders since the very beginning [1,2,3]. Tin–lead alloy solders, which provide a conductive path to complete the circuit, have desirable electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] during the connection process of circuit elements and solar cells [11,12]. However, with the rapid consumption of electronic products and photovoltaic modules, the environmental pollution caused by the related wastes, especially lead, is becoming increasingly serious. In response to concerns about the environment and human health, a number of countries have launched a series of policies and legislations to ban the use of lead. For example, the European Union introduced two draft proposals named the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and the Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) directives [13,14,15]. Japan required all new electronic/electrical products to be lead free. [16] The United States and the Republic of Korea have also enacted relevant laws [17,18,19]. So far, an increasing number of countries have made great efforts to look for lead-free alternatives to tin–lead alloy solders. Lead-free solders [20,21,22], such as Sn–Cu, Sn–Zn, and so forth, have received considerable attention [23,24]. They are not only environmentally friendly but have also proved to be attractive alternatives to some extent [25]. However, lead-free solders cannot meet all standards, including wettability, low melting point, mechanical integrity, and so forth [26,27]. Electrically conductive adhesives (ECAs) are regarded as the most promising alternative to tin–lead alloy solders because they are more environmentally friendly than lead, easier to fabricate, and have a lower processing temperature. Moreover, they can provide higher-resolution printing compared with tin–lead alloy solders [28].
ECAs mainly consist of an organic/polymer matrix and electrically conductive fillers, which provide the mechanical and electrical properties for ECAs, respectively. Generally, both thermosetting and thermoplastic materials can be used as the polymer matrix of ECAs, such as epoxy resin [29], silicone [30], phenolic epoxy [31], and so forth. Possible electrically conductive fillers include silver [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], gold [44,45,46], nickel [47,48,49], copper [50,51,52], graphene, and nanocarbon black [53,54,55,56,57]. Among the various electrically conductive fillers, Ag flakes are widely used in current commercial ECAs because they show high electrical conductivity and are easily processible. Note that over 50 wt % conductive fillers should be used generally in ECAs to achieve high electrical conductivity. Therefore, an increasing number of researchers have devoted themselves to studying electrically conductive fillers, in particular, reducing the mass fraction of Ag used in ECAs while ensuring electrical conductivity. Ji et al. [58] developed an ECA with a low Ag content based on the ternary hybrid of Ag microflakes, Ag nanospheres, and nanowires. Xu et al. fabricated a silver nanowire/graphene nanocomposite ECA via a self-assembly method [59]. In summary, much progress has been achieved regarding electrically conductive fillers in ECAs.
The conventional preparation process of ECAs consists of the following steps: preparing the polymer matrix and electrically conductive fillers, respectively, and mixing these two materials by stirring and rolling. Throughout the entire process, secondary pollution and mass loss are inevitably caused. At the same time, the stirring operation introduces many small and stable bubbles, which affect the electrical conductivity of the ECAs [60]. Therefore, the shortcomings of the conventional preparation process of ECAs should be remedied.
Powder spraying technology, which is mostly applied in the mechanical engineering field, provides an approach to fix the powder to substrates [61]. It can eliminate the vigorous mixing process of different components during processing of the target material, thus causing little disturbance to polymer matrix and avoiding secondary pollution and mass loss. Hence, in this study, we introduced powder spraying technology into the preparation of ECAs, whereby silver flakes are sprayed into epoxy resin to produce ECAs. This process results in excellent electrical conductivity and mechanical properties compared with the conventional method.

2. Experiment

2.1. Raw Materials and Experimental Equipment

2.1.1. Raw Materials

The following raw materials were used as supplied: Ag flakes (FAg-8921) from Sino-Platinum Metals Co., Ltd. (Kunming, China); bisphenol-F-based epoxy resin (EPON 862) with an epoxy equivalent weight of 165–173 g/eq, a viscosity of 2.5–4.5 Paˑs (25 °C), and a density of 1.17 × 106 g/m3 from Shell (China) Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China); a curing agent (amine adduct, PN-40) with an average particle size of about 10–12 μm, a softening point of 105–110 °C, and a pot life of about 3 months from Japanese Ajinomoto Co., Ltd. (Kawasaki, Japan); 2-ethoxyethyl acetate (AR, 98%) from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); a powder spray bottle from Hopeck Plastics Industry (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China); and round cover slips (10 mm in diameter) from Jianghai Glass Instrument Factory (Jiangsu, China).

2.1.2. Experiment Equipment

Electrical resistivity measurement was performed with an RTS-9 four-point probe resistivity measuring instrument (Four Probes Tech Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China). Lap shear strength measurement was performed with a CMT 6503 electromechanical universal testing machine (Sans Testing Machine Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). SEM was performed with a JEOL (JSM-7900F, JEOL, Kyoto, Japan) high-resolution scanning electron microscope.

2.2. Preparation of ECAs

2.2.1. Powder Spraying Process

The fabrication procedure consisted of three main steps: preparation of the polymer matrix, spraying of Ag flakes, and heat curing. The bisphenol-F-based epoxy resin (EPON 862) was used for the polymer matrix, which showed low viscosity and good chemical resistance characteristics. PN-40 was used as the latent curing agent, which reacts with epoxy resins at high temperatures on heating. First, 1 g of epoxy resin with 0.2 g of curing agent (PN-40) was stirred by hand clockwise with a glass rod (1.2–2.0 laps/s) for 7 min; then, 0.5 g of 2-ethoxyethyl acetate was added and stirred for 3 min at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Second, the sample was vacuumed for 30 min at room temperature. Note that the vacuum process conducted at room temperature cannot lead to the gelation reaction of the epoxy resin system since PN-40 is a latent curing agent. Thus, the polymer matrix was obtained.
For the spraying of Ag flakes process, the polymer matrix was first coated on the substrate. Second, the Ag flakes were sprayed into the polymer matrix with the mass fraction of the Ag flakes ranging from 0 to 80 wt % and then cured for 1 h at 150 °C in an oven. The whole preparation time was within 2 h. After that, it cooled down to room temperature for 10 h and the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process were obtained.

2.2.2. Conventional Process

For comparison with the powder spraying process, the conventional process was also used in this study. The fabrication procedure was as follows: First, the polymer matrix was prepared with the same method as the powder spraying process. Second, the Ag flakes were added into the polymer matrix with their mass fraction ranging from 0 to 80 wt %, with stirring performed as mentioned in the powder spraying process for 5 min simultaneously. After the stirring operation, it was coated on the substrate and cured for 1 h at 150 °C in an oven. The whole preparation time was within 2 h. After it cooled down to room temperature for 10 h, the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process were obtained.

2.3. Experiment Tests

2.3.1. Tests on Electrical Conductivity

To test the electrical conductivity, round cover slips of 10 mm in diameter were used as the substrate for the ECAs. The prepared ECAs were coated on the round cover slips. After curing and cooling down to room temperature, the electrical resistivity of the ECAs was measured with an RTS-9 four-point probe resistivity measurement meter. Each point was chosen five times, and the average value was taken for further data processing.

2.3.2. Tests on Shear Strength

The tests on shear strength were carried out using a CMT 6503 electromechanical universal testing machine employing the rigid-to-rigid tension loading mode. LY12-CZ aluminum alloy plates (Mingtai aluminium industry Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China) (100 × 25 × 2 mm3) were used as substrates for the ECAs for shear strength testing. They were first polished with abrasive paper and rinsed with acetone, then dried at room temperature. Afterward, the ECAs with a weight of 0.03–0.09 g were bonded between two LY12-CZ aluminum alloy plates with a contact area of 25 × 25 mm2 and a thickness of about 0.2–0.5 mm. In the tests, polyimide tape (0.3 mm in width, 0.07 mm in thickness) was used to control the thickness of the ECAs. It was adhered to the aluminum alloy plates and the thickness was controlled by the layers of the polyimide tape. Specifically, for the powder spraying process, the bond steps of the ECAs on LY12-CZ aluminum alloy plates were as follows: the polyimide tape was adhered to the aluminum alloy plates; the as-prepared polymer matrix was coated with a thin blade; the Ag flakes, ranging from 0 to 80 wt %, were sprayed; another aluminum alloy plate was covered and the two aluminum alloy plates were fixed with two binder clips on both sides. These operations were done at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, followed by curing at 150 °C for 1 h and cooling down to room temperature for 10 h. For the conventional process, the bond steps were similar to the powder spraying process to some extent: the polyimide tape was adhered to the aluminum alloy plates; the as-prepared mixture of polymer matrix was coated with Ag flakes ranging from 0 to 80 wt % with a thin blade; another aluminum alloy plate was covered and the two aluminum alloy plates were fixed with two binder clips on both sides. These operations were done at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, followed by curing at 150 °C for 1 h and cooling down to room temperature for 10 h. After cooling down to room temperature, the polyimide tape adhered to the aluminum alloy plates was removed in both the powder spraying process and conventional process. An electromechanical universal testing machine was used to test the lap shear strength of the ECAs coated between two aluminum alloy plates with a speed of 10 mm/min. The maximum load was measured when shear failure occurred. Each point was chosen five times, and the average value was taken for further data processing. The shear strength can be calculated with the following formula:
τ = P B ⋅ L
where τ is the shear strength of the ECAs (MPa), P is the maximum load when the sample fails (N), B is the width of the sample lap joint surface (mm), and L is the length of sample lap surface (mm).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrical Property of ECAs

In order to investigate the electrical property of the ECAs prepared with the powder spraying process and the conventional process, a series of experiments were carried out with an RTS-9 four-point probe resistivity measuring instrument.
Figure 1 shows the electrical property of the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process and the conventional process. As shown in the figure, the electrical resistivity for both ECAs exhibited a similar tendency of decreasing with a mass fraction of Ag flakes below 50 wt % and remaining stable with a mass fraction of Ag flakes higher than 50 wt %. This indicates that the electrical conductivity has a positive relationship with the content of Ag flakes. It can be clearly seen that the electrical resistivity of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process was lower than that of ECAs by the conventional process. Especially, ECAs with the conventional process showed no value of electrical conductivity under the mass fraction of Ag flakes below 40 wt %, while the ECAs with the powder spraying process showed obvious electrical conductivity. As the mass fraction of Ag flakes grew to 40 wt %, the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process exhibited a remarkable electrical resistivity of 1.9 × 10−3 Ωˑcm. However, the electrical resistivity of ECAs with the conventional process was 0.85 Ωˑcm, which was almost 400 times that of ECAs fabricated with the powder spraying process. This proves that the powder spraying process is feasible and better than the conventional process.
The results can be explained as follows. As mentioned above, epoxy resin was used as the polymer matrix. The epoxy resin, as the main component of the ECAs, fully dispersed Ag flakes when the mass fraction of the Ag flakes was below 40 wt % when the conventional process was adopted. The vast majority of Ag flakes were wrapped with epoxy resin after even stirring in the conventional process, leading to Ag flakes not being able to complete the circuit; consequently, there was no electrical resistivity value for the ECAs. However, during the powder spraying process, Ag flakes were sprayed into the epoxy resin and freely contacted with each other, so the ECAs prepared with the powder spraying process showed remarkable electrical conductivity. Therefore, ECAs fabricated with the powder spraying process showed excellent electrical conductivity compared with those fabricated by the conventional process.

3.2. Mechanical Property

In order to investigate the mechanical property of ECAs prepared by the powder spraying process and the conventional process, a series of experiments were carried out with an electromechanical universal testing machine.
Figure 2 demonstrates the lap shear strength of ECAs fabricated by the two different methods. Both ECAs fabricated by the two different methods showed a similar trend. As the mass fraction of Ag flakes increased, the lap shear strength of the ECAs simultaneously decreased. As the mass fraction of Ag flakes increased, the bonding strength between the ECAs and the substrate decreased. This indicates that the epoxy resin provided the mechanical property. Meanwhile, the figure shows that the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process had higher lap shear strength than those by the conventional process.

3.3. SEM Analysis

In order to investigate the morphology of ECAs prepared by the powder spraying process and the conventional process, high-resolution SEM was used to observe the microstructure of Ag flakes and ECAs, with the content of Ag flakes ranging from 20 to 80 wt %.

3.3.1. Ag Flakes

Figure 3 shows the microstructure of the Ag flakes. It can be observed that the Ag flakes had an irregular flake structure, with their size ranging from several to a dozen microns.

3.3.2. ECAs Filled with 20 wt % Ag Flakes

Figure 4a–d show the microstructure of the ECAs filled with 20 wt % Ag flakes. Figure 4a,b show ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process, and Figure 4c,d show the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process. From Figure 4a, it can be observed that the Ag flakes gathered together via interconnecting sheets and formed a network in the powder spraying process. Therefore, it could complete a circuit and showed electrical conductivity, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 4b shows its cross-sectional morphology. A few Ag flakes with an irregular flake structure are shown scattered in the epoxy resin because of the low mass fraction of Ag flakes.
Compared with the powder spraying process shown in Figure 4a,b, the Ag flakes were more discretely scattered in the epoxy resin shown in Figure 4c,d for the conventional process. The discrete Ag flakes of the ECAs could not form a network. This illustrates the reason for the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process not being able to show electrical conductivity, as shown in Figure 1, with the Ag flakes with a mass fraction of 20 wt %.

3.3.3. ECAs Filled with 30 wt % Ag Flakes

Figure 5a–d show the microstructure of the ECAs filled with 30 wt % Ag flakes. Figure 5a,b show the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process, and Figure 5c,d show the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process. From Figure 5a, it can be observed that a dense network of Ag flakes was formed compared with that shown in Figure 4a. Also, Figure 5b shows more Ag flakes fixed into the polymer matrix than that of Figure 4b. Therefore, the ECAs filled with 30 wt % Ag flakes had higher electrical conductivity than those filled with 20 wt % Ag flakes.
Compared with the ECAs filled with 20 wt % Ag flakes (Figure 4c,d), there were more Ag flakes scattered in the epoxy resin, as shown in Figure 5c,d, for the conventional process. However, the increasing content of Ag flakes could not yet form a network. This illustrates the reason for the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process not being able to show electrical conductivity, as shown in Figure 1, with the Ag flakes with a mass fraction of 30 wt %.

3.3.4. ECAs Filled with 40 wt % Ag Flakes

Figure 6a–d show the microstructure of ECAs filled with 40 wt % Ag flakes. Figure 6a,b show the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process, and Figure 6c,d show the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process. As shown in Figure 6a, a dense network of Ag flakes was formed compared with that shown in Figure 5a. Also, Figure 6b shows more Ag flakes fixed into the polymer matrix than that of Figure 5b. Therefore, the ECAs filled with 40 wt % Ag flakes had higher electrical conductivity than those filled with 30 wt % Ag flakes.
An incomplete network of Ag flakes emerged, as shown in Figure 6c. However, the Ag flakes shown in Figure 6c were still discrete and could insufficiently contact with each other, though more Ag flakes were fixed into the polymer matrix compared with that in Figure 5c. Meanwhile, the Ag flakes in the cross section are denser in Figure 6d than those in Figure 5d. Therefore, the ECAs filled with 40 wt % Ag flakes by the conventional process showed electrical conductivity to some extent with high electrical resistivity, as shown in Figure 1.

3.3.5. ECAs Filled with 50 wt % Ag Flakes

Figure 7a–d show the microstructure of the ECAs filled with 50 wt % Ag flakes. Figure 7a,b show the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process, and Figure 7c,d show the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process. As shown in Figure 7a,b, there were more Ag flakes fixed into the polymer matrix compared with that shown in Figure 6a,b. Meanwhile, a denser network was formed (Figure 7a) compared with that shown in Figure 6a.
A network of Ag flakes was basically formed (Figure 7c). The Ag flakes shown in Figure 7c relatively closely contacted with each other compared with those in Figure 6c. Meanwhile, the Ag flakes in the cross section were denser (Figure 7d) compared with those shown in Figure 6d. Therefore, the ECAs filled with 50 wt % Ag flakes by the conventional process showed obvious electrical conductivity compared with those filled with 40 wt % Ag flakes, as shown in Figure 1. Furthermore, the ECAs filled with 50 wt % Ag flakes had higher electrical conductivity than those filled with 40 wt % Ag flakes via both methods, which agrees well with the electrical resistivity data shown in Figure 1.

3.3.6. ECAs Filled with 60 wt % Ag Flakes

Figure 8a–d show the microstructure of ECAs filled with 60 wt % Ag flakes. Figure 8a,b show the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process, and Figure 8c,d show the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process. As shown in Figure 8a,b, there were more Ag flakes fixed into the polymer matrix compared with Figure 7a,b. Meanwhile, as Figure 8a shows, the network formed with Ag flakes was denser than that in Figure 7a. Simultaneously, there were more Ag flakes fixed into the polymer matrix, as shown in Figure 8c,d, compared with that in Figure 7c,d. Also, the network of Ag flakes was fully formed, as shown in Figure 8c, by the conventional process. Thus, when the content of Ag flakes was 60 wt %, the ECAs fabricated by the two methods showed good electrical resistivity, as shown in Figure 1.

3.3.7. ECAs Filled with 70 wt % Ag Flakes

Figure 9a–d show the microstructure of the ECAs filled with 70 wt % Ag flakes. It can be seen that the network formed with the Ag flakes became increasingly dense as the content of Ag flakes increased. There was a rare gap where the connection of Ag flakes was disconnected. This demonstrates that the Ag flakes adequately contacted with each other when the content of Ag flakes reached up to 70 wt % in both ECAs made by the two different methods. This is consistent with the electrical resistivity results (Figure 1).

3.3.8. ECAs Filled with 80 wt % Ag Flakes

Figure 10a–d show the microstructure of the ECAs filled with 80 wt % Ag flakes. It can be seen that the network formed with Ag flakes reached the densest state as the content of Ag flakes was up to 80 wt %. There was a rare gap where the connection of Ag flakes was disconnected. This demonstrates that the Ag flakes as electrical conduct fillers achieved compact interconnection when the content of Ag flakes reached up to 80 wt % in both ECAs prepared by the two different methods. This is consistent with the electrical resistivity results (Figure 1).

4. Conclusions

In this study, we developed a novel preparation method of ECAs by the powder spraying process. The ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process exhibited excellent properties compared with those made by the conventional preparation process. Especially at a low content of Ag flakes, they showed good electrical conductivity, while the ECAs fabricated by the conventional process could not. At the 40 wt % mass fraction of Ag flakes, ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process exhibited a remarkable electrical resistivity of 1.9 × 10−3 Ωˑcm, which was almost 400 times that of the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process. Further, the lap shear strength of the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process was higher than that of the conventional process. Therefore, the powder spraying process is feasible and superior to the conventional process. It can be speculated that the powder spraying process may have potential applications in the fields of solar panels, electrode materials, supercapacitors, and so on.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, H.D.; conceptualization, X.L.; methodology, Y.D.; validation, L.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.G.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Major Project of Shanxi (20181101018) and the Key R&D Project of Shanxi Province (201703D111008).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, D.; Timmermans, M.Y.; Tian, Y.; Nasibulin, A.G.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Kishimoto, S.; Mizutani, T.; Ohno, Y. Flexible high-performance carbon nanotube integrated circuits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sekitani, T.; Zschieschang, U.; Klauk, H.; Someya, T. Flexible organic transistors and circuits with extreme bending stability. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 1015–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ahn, J.H.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, K.J.; Jeon, S.; Kang, S.J.; Sun, Y.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. Heterogeneous three-dimensional electronics by use of printed semiconductor nanomaterials. Science 2006, 314, 1754–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tu, K.N.; Zeng, K.B. Tin–lead (Sn–Pb) solder reaction in flip chip technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2001, 34, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Basaran, C.; Jiang, J.B. Measuring intrinsic elastic modulus of Pb/Sn solder alloys. Mech. Mater. 2002, 34, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Frear, D.R. Issues related to the implementation of Pb-free electronic solders in consumer electronics. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 18, 319–330. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu, W.H.; Peng, S.P.; Lin, C.S.; Ho, C.E. Study of DC and AC electromigration behavior in eutectic Pb-Sn solder joints. J. Electron. Mater. 2009, 38, 2184–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, C.C.; Liu, P.C.; Chen, C.; Tu, K.N. Electromigration-induced Pb and Sn Whisker growth in SnPb solder stripes. J. Mater. Res. 2008, 23, 2017–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gomez, J.; Basaran, C. Damage mechanics constitutive model for Pb/Sn solder joints incorporating nonlinear kinematic hardening and rate dependent effects using a return mapping integration algorithm. Mech. Mater. 2006, 38, 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, C.F.; Wang, J.J.; Chung, W.K. A steady creep theory of high lead Pb/Sn solder with creep-parameters maps. J. Mech. 2005, 21, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, H.; Wang, H.; Cao, D.Y. Investigation of soldering for crystalline silicon solar cells. Solder. Surf. Mt. Technol. 2016, 28, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xiong, H.P.; Gan, C.H.; Hu, Z.G.; Niu, H.Y.; Li, J.F.; Si, J.F.; Xing, P.F.; Luo, X.T. Formation and orientational distribution of cracks induced by electromagnetic induction soldering in crystalline silicon solar cells. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2017, 7, 966–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Moon, K.S.; Wong, C.P. Electronics without lead. Science 2005, 308, 1419–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lau, J.H.; Wong, C.P.; Lee, N.-C.; Lee, S.-W.R. Electronics Manufacturing: with Lead-Free, Halogen-Free, and Conductive-Adhesive Materials, 1st ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 11.1–11.8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, C.; Chiang, J.; Lee, F.Y. De-mystifying materials selection for lead-free soldering. Circuit World 2006, 32, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heart, S. Green electronics through legislation and lead free soldering. Clean 2008, 36, 145–151. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nie, L.; Pecht, M.; Ciocci, R. Regulations and market trends in lead-free and halogen-free electronics. Circuit World 2007, 33, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Act for Resource Recycling of Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Vehicles. Available online: http://www.rsjtechnical.com/images/Documents/Korea_RoHS_ELV_April_2007_EcoFrontier.pdf (accessed on 20 August 2019).
  19. Zhang, S.Y.; Qi, X.Q.; Yang, M.; Cao, Y.; Lin, T.S.; He, P.; Paik, K.W. A study on the resistivity and mechanical properties of modified nano-Ag coated Cu particles in electrically conductive adhesives. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 9171–9183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, M.; Zhang, K.K.; Huo, F.P.; Wang, H.G.; Wang, Y. Microstructures and properties of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE composite solders reinforced with Cu-coated graphene nanosheets synthesized by pyrolysis. Materials 2019, 12, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, C.H.; Tsai, H.L.; Hwang, W.S. Direct printing of 1-D and 2-D electronically conductive structures by molten lead-free solder. Materials 2017, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheng, S.F.; Huang, C.M.; Pecht, M. Review of lead-free solders for electronics applications. Microelectron. Reliab. 2017, 75, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fukuda, M.; Imayoshi, K.; Matsumoto, Y. Effect of polyoxyethylenelaurylether on electrodeposition of Pb-free Sn–Bi alloy. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 47, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Firdaus, M.; Nazeri, M. Corrosion characterization of Sn-Zn solder: a review. Solder. Surf. Mt. Technol. 2019, 31, 52–67. [Google Scholar]
  25. Abtew, M.; Selvaduray, G. Lead-free solders in microelectronics. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2000, 27, 95–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Suganuma, K. Advances in lead-free electronics soldering. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2001, 5, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, F.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.Q.; Zhong, S.J.; Ma, J.; Bao, L. Effects of CuZnAl particles on properties and microstructure of Sn-58Bi solder. Materials 2017, 10, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Luo, J.; Cheng, Z.J.; Li, C.W.; Wang, L.J.; Yu, C.P.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, M.H.; Li, Q.W.; Yao, Y.G. Electrically conductive adhesives based on thermoplastic polyurethane filled with silver flakes and carbon nanotubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 129, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yan, C.; Liao, Q.W.; Zhou, X.L.; Wang, L.K.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, D. Ultra-low temperature curable nano-silver conductive adhesive for piezoelectric composite material. Phys. B Phys. Condens. Matter. 2018, 529, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miller, M.S.; O’Kane, J.C.; Niec, A.; Carmichael, R.S.; Carmichael, T.B. Silver nanowire/optical adhesive coatings as transparent electrodes for flexible electronics. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 10165–10172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ho, L.N.; Wu, T.F.; Nishikawa, H. Properties of phenolic-based Ag-filled conductive adhesive affected by different coupling agents. J. Adhes. 2013, 89, 847–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Suganuma, K.; Sakamoto, S.; Kagami, N.; Wakuda, D.; Kim, K.S.; Nogi, M. Low-temperature low-pressure die attach with hybrid silver particle paste. Microelectron. Reliab. 2012, 52, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, L.; Wan, C.; Fu, Y.G.; Chen, H.T.; Liu, X.J.; Li, M.Y. Study on the effects of adipic acid on properties of dicyandiamide-cured electrically conductive adhesive and the interaction mechanism. J. Electron. Mater. 2014, 43, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiong, N.N.; Li, Z.L.; Xie, H.; Zhao, Y.Z.; Wang, Y.H.; Li, J.Z. Influence of curing procedures on the electrical properties of epoxy-based isotropic conductive adhesives. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2016, 45, 2524–2528. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shen, Y.Q.; Chen, Z.X.; Zhou, T.T.; Feng, W.C.; Liu, Y. Green preparation of flaky silver powders with nano-thickness towards electrically conductive adhesives through a nanofilm transition method. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guan, Y.L.; Chen, X.; Li, F.Q.; Gao, H. Study on the curing process and shearing tests of die attachment by Ag-epoxy electrically conductive adhesive. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2010, 30, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.; Qi, S.H.; Wu, X.M.; Duan, G.C. Electrically conductive adhesive based on acrylate resin filled with silver plating graphite nanosheet. Synth. Met. 2011, 161, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, D.P.; Qiao, X.L.; Qiu, X.L.; Tan, F.T.; Chen, J.G.; Jiang, R.Z. Effect of silver nanostructures on the resistivity of electrically conductive adhesives composed of silver flakes. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2010, 21, 486–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eitner, U.; Geipel, T.; Holtschke, S.N.; Tranitz, M. Characterization of electrically conductive adhesives. Energy Procedia 2012, 27, 676–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cui, H.W.; Jiu, J.T.; Sugahara, T.; Nagao, S.; Suganuma, K.; Uchid, H. High performance heat curing copper-silver powders filled electrically conductive adhesives. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2015, 11, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wen, J.Y.; Tian, Y.H.; Hang, C.J.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, H.; Mei, Z.P.; Hu, X.Y.; Tian, Y.Q. Fabrication of novel printable electrically conductive adhesives (ECAs) with excellent conductivity and stability enhanced by the addition of polyaniline nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Meng, M.; Cheng, L.J.; Yang, K.; Sun, M.Y.; Luo, Y. A novel seedless TSV process based on room temperature curing silver nanowires ECAs for MEMS packaging. Micromachines 2019, 10, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liao, G.F.; Li, Q.; Zhao, W.Z.; Pang, Q.H.; Gao, H.Y.; Xu, Z.S. In-situ construction of novel silver nanoparticle decorated polymeric spheres as highly active and stable catalysts for reduction of methylene blue dye. Appl. Catal. AGen. 2018, 549, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, S.Y.; Dillard, D.A.; Dillard, J.G. Environmental aging effects on the durability of electrically conductive adhesive joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2003, 23, 235–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kuang, J.H.; Hsu, C.M.; Lin, A.D. A study on the conductivity variation of au coated conductive particles in ACF packaging process. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Y.; Moon, K.S.; Wong, C.P. Adherence of self-assembled monolayers on gold and their effects for high-performance anisotropic conductive adhesives. J. Electron. Mater. 2005, 34, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, J.G.; Sancaktar, E. Geometric effects on multilayer generic circuits fabricated using conductive epoxy/nickel adhesives. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2008, 22, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sancaktar, E.; Dilsiz, N. Thickness-dependent conduction behavior of various particles for conductive adhesive applications. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 1999, 13, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hansen, N.; Adams, D.O.; DeVries, K.L.; Goff, A.; Hansen, G. Investigation of electrically conductive structural adhesives using nickel nanostrands. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 2659–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Y.; Moon, K.S.; Wong, C.P. High performance anisotropic conductive adhesives using copper particles with an anti-oxidant coating layer. J. Electron. Packag. 2010, 132, 011007-1–011007-5. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ho, L.N.; Nishikawa, H. Influence of post-curing and coupling agents on polyurethane based copper filled electrically conductive adhesives. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2013, 24, 2077–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhu, X.Y.; Liu, Y.L.; Long, J.M.; Liu, X.L. Electrochemical migration behavior of Ag-plated Cu-filled electrically conductive adhesives. Rare Met. 2012, 31, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pu, N.W.; Peng, Y.Y.; Wang, P.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Shi, J.N.; Liu, Y.M.; Ger, M.D.; Chang, C.L. Application of nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets in electrically conductive adhesives. Carbon 2014, 67, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Amoli, B.M.; Trinidad, J.; Hu, A.M.; Zhou, Y.N.; Zhao, B.X. Highly electrically conductive adhesives using silver nanoparticle (Ag NP)-decorated graphene: The effect of NPs sintering on the electrical conductivity improvement. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, H.R.; Ma, M.Z.; Zeng, J.F.; Guo, X.H.; Ma, Y.Q. Hydrothermal synthesis of graphene nanosheets and its application in electrically conductive adhesives. Mater. Lett. 2016, 178, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Masaebi, N.; Peighambardoust, S.J.; Ahadzadeh, I. Electrically conductive nanocomposite adhesives based on epoxy resin filled with silver coated nanocarbon black. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 11840–11851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, J.Y.; Lai, Y.C.; Chang, C.L.; Hung, W.C.; Wu, H.M.; Liao, Y.C.; Huang, C.H.; Liu, W.R. Facile and green synthesis of graphene-rased conductive adhesives via liquid exfoliation process. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ji, Y.H.; Liu, Y.; Huang, G.W.; Shen, X.J.; Xiao, H.M.; Fu, S.Y. Ternary Ag/epoxy adhesive with excellent overall performance. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 8041–8052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xu, T.; Chen, J.Y.; Yuan, W.H.; Liu, Y.H.; Sun, Y.J.; Wu, H.J.; Zhou, X.Q. Self-assembly synthesis of silver nanowires/graphene nanocomposite and its effects on the performance of electrically conductive adhesive. Materials 2018, 11, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wang, L.G. The preparation of high conductivity of silver conductive adhesive and low-cost research. Master’s Thesis, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China, 28 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
  61. Koury, A.J.; Conte, A.A., Jr.; Devine, M.J. Powder coating technology. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 1972, 44, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 02793 g001 550
Figure 1. Electrical property of electrically conductive adhesives (ECAs) fabricated by the powder spraying process and the conventional process.
Figure 1. Electrical property of electrically conductive adhesives (ECAs) fabricated by the powder spraying process and the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g001
Materials 12 02793 g002 550
Figure 2. Lap shear strength of the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process and the conventional process.
Figure 2. Lap shear strength of the ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process and the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g002
Materials 12 02793 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of Ag flakes. (a): aggregates of Ag flakes; (b): magnification image of Ag flakes.
Figure 3. SEM images of Ag flakes. (a): aggregates of Ag flakes; (b): magnification image of Ag flakes.
Materials 12 02793 g003
Materials 12 02793 g004 550
Figure 4. ECAs filled with 20 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Figure 4. ECAs filled with 20 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g004
Materials 12 02793 g005 550
Figure 5. ECAs filled with 30 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Figure 5. ECAs filled with 30 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g005
Materials 12 02793 g006 550
Figure 6. ECAs filled with 40 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Figure 6. ECAs filled with 40 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g006
Materials 12 02793 g007 550
Figure 7. ECAs filled with 50 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Figure 7. ECAs filled with 50 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g007
Materials 12 02793 g008 550
Figure 8. ECAs filled with 60 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Figure 8. ECAs filled with 60 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g008
Materials 12 02793 g009 550
Figure 9. ECAs filled with 70 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Figure 9. ECAs filled with 70 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g009
Materials 12 02793 g010 550
Figure 10. ECAs filled with 80 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Figure 10. ECAs filled with 80 wt % Ag flakes. (a) ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; and (b) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the powder spraying process; (c) ECAs fabricated by the conventional process; and (d) cross sections of ECAs fabricated by the conventional process.
Materials 12 02793 g010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, H.; Li, X.; Dong, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhao, L. A Novel Preparation Method of Electrically Conductive Adhesives by Powder Spraying Process. Materials 2019, 12, 2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172793

AMA Style

Dong H, Li X, Dong Y, Guo S, Zhao L. A Novel Preparation Method of Electrically Conductive Adhesives by Powder Spraying Process. Materials. 2019; 12(17):2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Hongyu, Xin Li, Yi Dong, Shaoqing Guo, and Liangfu Zhao. 2019. "A Novel Preparation Method of Electrically Conductive Adhesives by Powder Spraying Process" Materials 12, no. 17: 2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172793

APA Style

Dong, H., Li, X., Dong, Y., Guo, S., & Zhao, L. (2019). A Novel Preparation Method of Electrically Conductive Adhesives by Powder Spraying Process. Materials, 12(17), 2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop