Next Article in Journal
De-alloying Behavior of Mg–Al alloy in Sulphuric Acid and Acetic Acid Aqueous Solutions
Next Article in Special Issue
Fractal Analysis of the Fracture Evolution of Freeze-Thaw Damage to Asphalt Concrete
Previous Article in Journal
A DIC-Based Study on Compressive Responses of Concrete after Exposure to Elevated Temperatures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of CaSO4 Incorporation on Pore Structure and Drying Shrinkage of Alkali-Activated Binders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate by C3S Carbonation

1
College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(13), 2045; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132045
Submission received: 16 May 2019 / Revised: 13 June 2019 / Accepted: 20 June 2019 / Published: 26 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microstructures and Durability of Cement-Based Materials)

Abstract

:
The effect of graphene oxide (GO) on the crystallization of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is explored in this paper. Precipitation of CaCO3 was carried out by bubbling carbon dioxide (CO2) through tricalcium silicate (C3S) hydration solution with different graphene oxide admixture contents (0.2%, 1% and 2% mass ratios based on C3S). The polymorph, morphology, crystal size and particle size of CaCO3 were evaluated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), an environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM), and laser particle size analysis. The results showed that addition of GO was able to promote the conversion of CaCO3 to a calcite crystal phase with higher thermal stability and crystallinity than the control. However, as the dosage of GO increased, the growth of the calcite crystal particles was somewhat suppressed, resulting in a decrease in the crystal particle size and a narrow particle size distribution. When the amount of GO was 0.2%, 1% and 2%, the crystal size of the calcite was 5.49%, 12.38%, and 24.61% lower than that of the sample without GO, respectively, while the particle size of the calcite also decreased by 17.21%, 39.26%, 58.03%, respectively.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the application of graphene oxide (GO) has been widely studied because of its unique physicochemical and structural properties [1,2]. Some studies [3,4,5,6,7,8] have reported that GO, as a reinforcing material, can improve the mechanical properties and microstructure of cementitious composites because of its high specific strength, high toughness, large specific surface area and low weight. Calcium carbonate (CaCO3), as a common cementitious composite, may have its carbonation process enhanced by applying nanomaterials such as GO. CaCO3 has been widely used in various industries, such as rubber, ink, plastics and building materials [9,10]. At present, various methods for preparing CaCO3 have been explored, such as carbonization, chemical precipitation [11], ultrasonic assisted synthesis [12], in situ deposition methods [13], and biologically controlled CaCO3 deposition [14,15]. Carbonization is an industrially useful method because it is environmentally friendly effectively uses mineral resources [16,17]. The crystallization, morphology, crystal size, and phase structure of CaCO3 are affected by admixture, temperature, concentration, and so on [18,19,20,21,22]. Currently, researchers usually use a variety of additives, such as surfactants, metallic ions, and GO, to control the crystallization, nucleation and crystal growth process of CaCO3 [23,24,25,26,27,28].
Carbonization is a very common phenomenon in the hydration process of cement. As the main product of the cement carbonization reaction, the formation of CaCO3 reduces the alkalinity of concrete and weakens the protection of steel bars [29]. On the other hand, the formation of CaCO3 can make concrete structures more compact and consequently improve their mechanical properties [30,31,32,33,34]. Besides, many studies have shown that calcium carbonates with different morphologies and crystalline structures have different effects on the microstructure of cement [34,35,36]. Due to the excellent mechanical properties of GO, the possibility of its application in cement has been extensively explored. Previous studies have reported that addition of GO promoted the hydration of cement and significantly increased the compressive and flexural strength of cement [37,38,39]. In a recent study, Lv et al. [40] found that the addition of GO was capable of affecting the shape of cement hydration products, such as ettringite (AFt) and monosulfate (AFm). However, Cui et al. [41] subsequently questioned this finding and experimentally confirmed that the change in shape of the hydration product was the result of a carbonization reaction. Nevertheless, in the carbonization process of cement, the effect of GO on the polymorph, morphology, and crystal size of CaCO3 has not been directly studied.
Whether as an additive material or a carbonized product of cement, the properties of CaCO3 can have a significant impact on the performance of cement. As the major mineral component in Portland cement, the hydration reaction of tricalcium silicate (C3S) largely represents the hydration process of cement. Therefore, this study only focused on C3S hydration to simulate the hydration process of cement. Precipitation of CaCO3 was carried out by bubbling carbon dioxide (CO2) through C3S hydration solution with different GO admixture contents (0.2%, 1% and 2% mass ratios based on C3S). The effects of GO on the polymorphism, morphology, crystal size and particle size of CaCO3 during cement carbonization were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), an environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM), and laser particle size analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The XRD pattern of the C3S used in this research is shown in Figure 1. According to the peak correspondence of PDF#49-0442, it can be seen that the sample tested was C3S crystal, and the sample was highly pure with almost no other crystal impurities. A GO dispersion (6.4 g/L, Laboratory synthesis) was also used in this experiment, along with pure CO2 supplied by Shente company (Shenzhen, China) and distilled water.

2.2. Synthesis of CaCO3 by the Carbonation Method

Carbonation was used in this experiment to synthesize CaCO3 [42]. Firstly, C3S was mixed with distilled water and different mass ratios of GO (0.2%, 1%, and 2%) in a three-necked flask. The mass ratio of C3S to water was set to 1/140. The mixture was stirred under sealed conditions for 24 h with a constant stirring rate of 300 rpm [43]. After 24 h of the hydration reaction, pure CO2 was introduced into the slurry through a tube at a speed of 100 ml/min. As the pH of the slurry decreased to 7, the passage of CO2 was stopped. The resulting precipitate was separated from the mother liquor by suction filtration and washed with distilled water. Finally, the precipitate was dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h. The hydration reaction of C3S produces calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel and the carbonation reaction can be represented by the following expressions [44]:
CO2 + H2O ↔ H2CO3 ↔ H+ + HCO3 ↔ 2H+ + CO32−
C3S + 6H2O → C-S-H + 3Ca(OH)2
Ca(OH)2 + 2H+ + CO32− → CaCO3 + 2H2O
C-S-H + 2H+ + CO32− → CaCO3 + SiOxOHx
C-S-H + H+ + HCO3 → CaCO3 + SiOxOHx

2.3. Characterization Methods

The morphology of the final CaCO3 products was observed using an environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM, Quanta TM 250 FEG, 20 KV, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The sample surface was coated with a thin layer of gold nanoparticles prior to ESEM testing. X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used to analyze the polymorph of the samples at a scanning rate of 2°/min from 10° to 70° with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å) on a D max/RB diffractometer. The particle size distribution of the CaCO3 was measured by wide-angle, static-dynamic, synchronous laser scattering (Mastersizer 2000, Malvern, UK). All tests were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of GO on the Crystal Polymorph of CaCO3

The CaCO3 crystals formed by carbonization of the C3S hydration products—with different mass ratios of GO—were measured by XRD. As shown in Figure 2, diffraction peaks of 2θ at 23.06°, 29.41°, 35.96°, 39.42°, and 43.17° corresponded with (012), (104), (110), (113), and (202) crystallographic planes of calcite, respectively, while peaks at 24.87°, 27.18° and 32.71° corresponded with (100), (101), and (102) crystallographic planes of vaterite [1]. In Figure 2, it can also be observed that the CaCO3 formed via the carbonization reaction without GO contained two crystals of calcite and vaterite. When GO was present, regardless of the amount, all of the CaCO3—obtained via the reaction of the C3S hydration product with CO2—was converted into calcite. Previous studies have shown that CaCO3 exhibits three polymorphic forms, namely calcite, aragonite and vaterite [45,46]. Among them, calcite is the most stable form in thermodynamics, while vaterite is the most unstable [47]. Combined with the XRD results, we can conclude that the addition of GO was able to promote the formation of calcite during the carbonation of the C3S hydration products. Yao et al. gave a similar conclusion when they used CaCl2 and (NH4)2CO3 (as sources of calcium) in conjunction with CO2 to prepare CaCO3 via a precipitation reaction [1]. Some researchers [1,28] believe that –COOH on the surface of GO can coordinate with Ca2+ ions in solution to provide a nucleation site for crystallization of CaCO3, thereby promoting crystallization of CaCO3. However, the present study shows an interesting phenomenon—that GO can still affect the crystallization of CaCO3 after participating in the C3S hydration for 24 h, indicating that the cement modified by GO is still likely to be affected by the presence of GO during carbonization. This phenomenon may be due to the linkage of GO to C-S-H [48], which affects the subsequent carbonization process.

3.2. Effect of GO on the Crystal Size of CaCO3

The Debye–Scherrer equation, as expressed in Equation (6), was used to analyze the crystal size of the samples [3].
D = K λ β cos θ
where: D is the size of grains in the direction perpendicular to the crystal plane; K is a constant (K = 0.89 when the particles are spherical or K = 0.943 when the particles are cubic); λ is the X-ray wavelength; β stands for the diffraction peak half-width when the particles are spherical, while β should be converted to radians, represented by β’, when the particles are cubic (Equation (7)); and θ is the diffraction angle of the X-ray.
β = ( β × π ) / 180
Table 1 shows the effect of GO dosage on the diffraction angle, peak height and crystal size of the calcite formed by the carbonation of C3S hydration products. As shown in Table 1, the diffraction angle of the calcite remained almost the same regardless of the GO content. This indicated that the addition of GO had no effect on the unit cell parameters of the calcite. The diffraction peak height of the (104) plane for the blank sample was 1860, and the corresponding crystal size of the calcite was 90.63 nm. However, compared with the blank sample, the diffraction peak intensity of the (104) plane for the calcite increased by 346.34%, 206.18%, and 90.38%, while the size of the calcite crystals decreased by 5.49%, 12.38%, and 24.61% when the amount of GO was set to 0.2%, 1%, and 2%, respectively. The peak height and crystal size of the calcite at (012), (110), (113) and (202) planes showed the same changes in regularity. A comparison of the diffraction peak heights and crystal sizes of each group showed that the addition of GO increased the peak height of the calcite while decreasing its crystal size. At the same time, with the increase of GO content, both the peak height and crystal size gradually decreased. Combined with the results of Figure 1, it can be concluded that the presence of GO promoted the conversion of CaCO3 to the most stable calcite crystal phase with high crystallinity. However, when the GO dosage was increased, the growth of the calcite crystal particles was somewhat suppressed, and thus the crystal grain size gradually reduced.
The particle size distribution of the CaCO3 prepared with different mass ratios of GO were measured using a laser particle size analyzer. The differential and integral curves of the particle size distribution are shown in Figure 3. From this figure, it is obvious that both the differential and integral curves shifted to the left after the addition of GO, and that the shift amplitude increased with increasing GO dosage, indicating that the particle size of the CaCO3 particles formed by the carbonization reaction became smaller.
These results were then evaluated by the Rosin–Rammler distribution function, which is commonly used to simulate and analyze the particle size distribution of powders, such as dust and limestone [49]. The Rosin–Rammler distribution function is shown in Equation (8).
R(Dp) = 1 − exp[−(Dp/De)n]
where: Dp is the corresponding particle diameter (μm); R(Dp) is the cumulative percentage over size (%); De is a constant-related particle size; and the index, n, is a constant, which is related to the range of the particle size distribution. The larger the value of n, the narrower the distribution range of the particle diameter. The fitting results of the CaCO3 particle size distribution by the Rosin–Rammler function are displayed in Table 2.
As seen in Table 2, the n value of the CaCO3 particles formed when no GO was added in the preparation process was 1.847, with an average particle size of 15.705 μm. Interestingly, we found that the n value increased while De decreased with increasing GO dosage. When the amount of GO was gradually increased from 0.2% to 2%, the value of n continuously increased, whereas the value of De decreased significantly (17.21%, 39.26%, and 58.03% for 0.2%, 1%, and 2% GO content, respectively). This means that the particle size of CaCO3 gradually became smaller and the particle size distribution became more uniform with increasing GO content. It has previously been reported that the size of CaCO3 particles is highly dependent on both the nucleation rate and the crystal growth rate, and that groups on the surface of GO—such as the carboxyl groups—may provide nucleation sites for CaCO3 and thereby promote the formation of calcite [28,50]. The observed narrowing of the particle size distribution and the large reduction in particle size appears to support the notion that the addition of GO promotes the nucleation rate of CaCO3 while reducing its growth rate. These results are also consistent with the findings presented in Figure 2 and Table 1. However, it is worth considering that the carboxyl group on the surface of the GO—after participating in the hydration reaction—should have already captured the Ca2+. Therefore, it is unlikely to continue to be a nucleation site for CaCO3 crystallization during the carbonization process. There may be other mechanisms for the occurrence of this phenomenon, which requires further experimentation and analysis.

3.3. Effect of GO on the Morphology of CaCO3

Figure 4 presents ESEM images of the CaCO3 prepared with different contents of GO. As depicted in Figure 4a, the CaCO3 crystals were found to be cubic and spherical in shape when no GO was added into the mixture. According to the XRD results in Figure 2, the cubic-shaped particles are considered to be calcite while the spherical-shaped particles are vaterite. As shown in Figure 4b–d, after the addition of GO, the CaCO3 generated via carbonation were all square-shaped calcites. From these results, it can be concluded that the addition of GO created cubic-shaped CaCO3, and that changes in GO content did not affect the shape of the CaCO3. This is consistent with the findings shown in Figure 2.

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

The effect of GO on the crystal phase and crystal size of CaCO3 during the carbonation of C3S hydration products was investigated. From the results of XRD and SEM analysis, we concluded that the presence of GO promoted the conversion of CaCO3 to a crystal phase with higher thermal stability than the control—i.e., to a calcite crystal phase. However, an increase in the amount of GO had a certain inhibitory effect on the growth of the calcite crystal particles. From the test results, the crystal size of calcite became the largest when the lowest amount of GO was added. After participating in C3S hydration for 24 h, GO still had an effect on the polymorphism and crystal size of CaCO3, but the mechanism remains uncertain and further studies are needed. Although the polymorphism and crystal size of CaCO3 are discussed, the mechanical properties—such as elastic modulus and hardness value—have not been fully studied, and thus will become the focus of future research.

Author Contributions

H.C. and D.Z. conceived and designed the experiments; H.Y. and F.Y. performed the experiments; B.Z. and D.Z. analyzed the data; F.Y. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; D.Z. wrote the paper.

Funding

The work described in this paper was fully supported by grants from Natural Science Foundation of China (51678367).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

GOGraphene oxide
CaCO3Calcium carbonate
C3STricalcium silicate (3CaO·SiO2)
C-S-HCalcium silicate hydrate (3CaO·SiO2 3H2O)
CO2Carbon dioxide
ESEMEnvironmental scanning electronic microscope
XRDX-ray diffraction
CaCl2Anhydrous calcium chloride
AFtEttringite
AFmMonosulfate

References

  1. Yao, C.; Xie, A.; Shen, Y.; Zhu, J.; Li, H. Nacre-like calcium carbonate controlled by ionic liquid/graphene oxide composite template. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 51, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cheng, Q.; Jiang, L.; Tang, Z. Bioinspired layered materials with superior mechanical performance. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1256–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lin, C.; Wei, W.; Hu, Y.H. Catalytic behavior of graphene oxide for cement hydration process. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2016, 89, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tong, T.; Fan, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wang, S.; Tan, S.; Yu, Q. Investigation of the effects of graphene and graphene oxide nanoplatelets on the micro- and macro-properties of cementitious materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 106, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wille, K.; Naaman, A.E.; El-Tawil, S.; Parra-Montesinos, G.J. Ultra-high performance concrete and fiber reinforced concrete: Achieving strength and ductility without heat curing. Mater. Struct. 2011, 45, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.W.; Potts, J.R.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, H.; Monasterio, M.; Cui, H.; Han, N. Experimental study of the effects of graphene oxide on microstructure and properties of cement paste composite. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 102, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, H.; Cui, H.; Tang, W.; Li, Z.; Han, N.; Xing, F. A critical review on research progress of graphene/cement based composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 102, 273–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, J.; Lei, M.; Cheng, B.; Zhao, X. Facile preparation of calcium carbonate particles with unusual morphologies by precipitation reaction. J. Cryst. Growth 2004, 261, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dalas, E.; Klepetsanis, P.; Koutsoukos, P. The overgrowth of calcium carbonate on poly (vinyl chloride-co-vinyl acetate-co-maleic acid). Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 1999, 15, 8322–8327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kitamura, M.; Konno, H.; Yasui, A.; Masuoka, H. Controlling factors and mechanism of reactive crystallization of calcium carbonate polymorphs from calcium hydroxide suspensions. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 236, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, M.; Forssberg, E.; Wang, Y.; Han, Y. Ultrasonication-Assisted Synthesis of Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2005, 192, 1468–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mishra, S.; Sonawane, S.H.; Singh, R.P. Studies on characterization of nano CaCO3 prepared by thein situ deposition technique and its application in PP-nano CaCO3 composites. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2005, 43, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nitta, I.; Kida, A.; Fujibayashi, Y.; Katayama, H.; Sugimura, Y. Calcium carbonate deposition in a cell wall sac formed in mulberry idioblasts. Protoplasma 2006, 228, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Robbins, L.; Blackwelder, P. Biochemical and ultrastructural evidence for the origin of whitings: A biologically induced calcium carbonate precipitation mechanism. Geology 1992, 20, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, C.; Xiao, P.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z. Biomimetic synthesis of hydrophobic calcium carbonate nanoparticles via a carbonation route. Powder Technol. 2006, 170, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Y.; Ji, X.; Zhao, G.; Wang, X. Facile preparation of cubic calcium carbonate nanoparticles with hydrophobic properties via a carbonation route. Powder Technol. 2010, 200, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dalas, E.; Malkaj, P. Calcium Carbonate Crystallization in the Presence of Aspartic Acid. Cryst. Growth Des. 2004, 4, 721–723. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hashim, A.; Al-Hosney, V.H.G. Carbonic Acid an Important Intermediate in the Surface Chemistry of Calcium Carbonate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8068–8069. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, A.; Ma, P.; Fu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Kong, W. Crystallization and assembling behavior of calcium carbonate controlled by Ca-organic fibers. J. Cryst. Growth 2013, 377, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, H.; Qin, Z.; Qian, P.; Yu, P.; Cui, S.; Wang, W. Crystallization of aragonite CaCO3 with complex structures. Adv. Powder Technol. 2011, 22, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nassar, M.M.; Farrag, T.E.; Mahmoud, M.S.; Abdelmonem, S.; Khalil, K.A.; Barakat, N.A.M. Influence of the operating conditions on the morphology of CaCO3 nanoparticles prepared by modified co-precipitation with pulse mode feeding. Adv. Powder Technol. 2015, 26, 914–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, A.-W.; Dong, W.-F.; Antonietti, M.; Cölfen, H. Polymorph Switching of Calcium Carbonate Crystals by Polymer-Controlled Crystallization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1307–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ji, X.; Li, G.; Huang, X. The synthesis of hollow CaCO3 microspheres in mixed solutions of surfactant and polymer. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nishino, Y.; Oaki, Y.; Imai, H. Magnesium-Mediated Nanocrystalline Mosaics of Calcite. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cui, J.; Kennedy, J.F.; Nie, J.; Ma, G. Co-effects of amines molecules and chitosan films on in vitro calcium carbonate mineralization. Carbohydr. Polyme. 2015, 133, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yuan, G.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Liang, Q.; Miao, G.; Yuan, B. The synthesis of calcium carbonate microparticles with multiple morphologies through self-assembly method. Powder Technol. 2015, 284, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yaseen, S.A.; Yiseen, G.A.; Li, Z. Synthesis of calcium carbonate in alkali solution based on graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. J. Sol. State Chem. 2018, 262, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, J.; Lu, L. Coupled effect of axially distributed load and carbonization on permeability of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 79, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, B.; Ye, G. Development of porosity of cement paste blended with supplementary cementitious materials after carbonation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 145, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, D.; Shao, Y. Effect of early carbonation curing on chloride penetration and weathering carbonation in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 123, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zelić, J.; Krstulović, R.; Tkalčec, E.; Krolo, P. Durability of the hydrated limestone-silica fume Portland cement mortars under sulphate attack. Cement Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vuk, T.; Tinta, V.; Gabrovšek, R.; Kaučič, V. The effects of limestone addition, clinker type and fineness on properties of Portland cement. Cement Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cao, M.; Ming, X.; He, K.; Li, L.; Shen, S. Effect of Macro-, Micro- and Nano-Calcium Carbonate on Properties of Cementitious Composites—A Review. Materials 2019, 12, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ruan, S.; Unluer, C. Unluer, Influence of mix design on the carbonation, mechanical properties and microstructure of reactive MgO cement-based concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 80, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jeong, Y.; Hargis, C.W.; Chun, S.; Moon, J. Effect of Calcium Carbonate Fineness on Calcium Sulfoaluminate-Belite Cement. Materials 2017, 10, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kudzma, A.; Skamat, J.; Stonys, R.; Krasnikovs, A.; Kuznetsov, D.; Girskas, G.; Antonovic, V. Study on the Effect of Graphene Oxide with Low Oxygen Content on Portland Cement Based Composites. Materials 2019, 12, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pan, Z.; He, L.; Qiu, L.; Korayem, A.H.; Li, G.; Zhu, J.W.; Collins, F.; Li, D.; Duan, W.H.; Wang, M.C. Mechanical properties and microstructure of a graphene oxide–cement composite. Cement Concr. Compos. 2015, 58, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Krystek, M.; Pakulski, D.; Patroniak, V.; Gorski, M.; Szojda, L.; Ciesielski, A.; Samori, P. High-Performance Graphene-Based Cementitious Composites. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1801195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lv, S.H.; Deng, L.J.; Yang, W.Q.; Zhou, Q.F.; Cui, Y.Y. Fabrication of polycarboxylate/graphene oxide nanosheet composites by copolymerization for reinforcing and toughening cement composites. Cement Concr. Compos. 2016, 66, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cui, H.; Yan, X.; Tang, L.; Xing, F. Possible pitfall in sample preparation for SEM analysis—A discussion of the paper “Fabrication of polycarboxylate/graphene oxide nanosheet composites by copolymerization for reinforcing and toughening cement composites” by Lv et al. Cement Concr. Compos. 2017, 77, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sheng, Y.; Zhou, B.; Zhao, J.; Tao, N.; Yu, K.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Z. Influence of octadecyl dihydrogen phosphate on the formation of active super-fine calcium carbonate. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 272, 326–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Monasterio, M.; Gaitero, J.J.; Erkizia, E.; Guerrero Bustos, A.M.; Miccio, L.A.; Dolado, J.S.; Cerveny, S. Effect of addition of silica- and amine functionalized silica-nanoparticles on the microstructure of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 450, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. de Sena Costaa, B.L.; de Oliveira Freitas, J.C.; Santos, P.H.S.; de Araújo Melo, D.M.; de Oliveira, Y.H. Effects of carbon dioxide in Portland cement: A relation between static sedimentation and carbonation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 150, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kojima, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nishimiya, N. Effect of amplitude and frequency of ultrasonic irradiation on morphological characteristics control of calcium carbonate. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2010, 17, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kirboga, S.; Oner, M.; Akyol, E. The effect of ultrasonication on calcium carbonate crystallization in the presence of biopolymer. J. Cryst. Growth 2014, 401, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kato, T.; Sugawara, A.; Hosoda, N. Calcium carbonate–organic hybrid materials. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kamali, M.; Ghahremaninezhad, A. A Study of Calcium-Silicate-Hydrate/Polymer Nanocomposites Fabricated Using the Layer-By-Layer Method. Materials 2018, 11, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.J.; Sakai, E.; Daimon, M. Effect of particle size distribution of fly ash–cement system on the fluidity of cement pastes. Cement Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Konopacka-Łyskawa, D.; Kościelska, B.; Karczewski, J.; Gołąbiewska, A. The influence of ammonia and selected amines on the characteristics of calcium carbonate precipitated from calcium chloride solutions via carbonation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 193, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of tricalcium silicate (C3S).
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of tricalcium silicate (C3S).
Materials 12 02045 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) crystals prepared with different content of graphene oxide (GO).
Figure 2. XRD patterns of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) crystals prepared with different content of graphene oxide (GO).
Materials 12 02045 g002
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of CaCO3 prepared with different dosages of GO: (a) Differential distribution, and (b) integral distribution.
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of CaCO3 prepared with different dosages of GO: (a) Differential distribution, and (b) integral distribution.
Materials 12 02045 g003
Figure 4. Environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM) images of CaCO3 crystals prepared with different mass ratios of GO: (a) No GO, (b) 0.2% GO, (c) 1% GO, and (d) 2% GO.
Figure 4. Environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM) images of CaCO3 crystals prepared with different mass ratios of GO: (a) No GO, (b) 0.2% GO, (c) 1% GO, and (d) 2% GO.
Materials 12 02045 g004
Table 1. The diffraction angle, peak height and crystal size of the calcite prepared with different content of GO.
Table 1. The diffraction angle, peak height and crystal size of the calcite prepared with different content of GO.
h, k, lGO%2θ(°)Peak HeightCrystal Size (nm)
012023.03117892.38
0.223.05369787.62
123.05554981.72
223.05522560.71
104029.369186090.63
0.229.399830285.65
129.400569579.41
229.400354168.33
110035.93622784.43
0.235.96895479.34
135.97367474.83
235.97341767.35
113039.36933293.11
0.239.408144183.44
139.41196480.41
239.41158859.37
202043.11626593.28
0.243.157122189.72
143.16287581.41
243.16250160.11
Table 2. Fitting results of CaCO3 particle size distribution.
Table 2. Fitting results of CaCO3 particle size distribution.
GO%n ValueDe Value (μm)
01.84715.705
0.21.99913.002
12.1599.540
22.2566.591

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, D.; Yang, H.; Yu, F.; Zhang, B.; Cui, H. Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate by C3S Carbonation. Materials 2019, 12, 2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132045

AMA Style

Zheng D, Yang H, Yu F, Zhang B, Cui H. Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate by C3S Carbonation. Materials. 2019; 12(13):2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Dapeng, Haibin Yang, Feng Yu, Bo Zhang, and Hongzhi Cui. 2019. "Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate by C3S Carbonation" Materials 12, no. 13: 2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop