Next Article in Journal
Aging Response and Precipitation Behavior after 5% Pre-Deformation of an Al-Mg-Si-Cu Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Aluminium Flakes in Fabrication of Open-Cell Aluminium Foams by Space Holder Method
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/ma11081421
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Performance Gas Separation Mixed Matrix Membrane Fabricated by Incorporation of Functionalized Submicrometer-Sized Metal-Organic Framework

by
Baosheng Ge
1,
Yanyan Xu
2,3,
Haoru Zhao
2,
Haixiang Sun
1,2,*,
Yaoli Guo
1 and
Wenguang Wang
2
1
State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
2
College of Science, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
3
Guangzhou Special Pressure Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Guangzhou 510663, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(8), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081421
Submission received: 29 June 2018 / Revised: 8 August 2018 / Accepted: 8 August 2018 / Published: 13 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Thin Films and Interfaces)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) attract great attention due to their outstanding gas separation performance. The compatibility between the fillers and the polymer matrix is one of the key points for the preparation of high-performance MMMs. In this work, MMMs consisting of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) of amine-modified Cu-BTC (NH2-Cu-BTC; BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid) and submicrometer-sized amine-modified Cu-BTC (sub-NH2-Cu-BTC) incorporated into a Pebax-1657 polymer were fabricated for the gas separation. The SEM image and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra showed an increase in the surface roughness of MOFs and the presence of amino groups on the surface of Cu-BTC after the amination modification, and a decrease in the size of MOFs crystals after the submicrometer-sized aminated modification. Gas adsorption analysis indicated that NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC had a higher gas adsorption capacity for CO2 compared to the unmodified Cu-BTC. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image showed that NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC, especially sub-NH2-Cu-BTC, had a better compatibility with a polyether-block-amide (Pebax) matrix in the MMMs. The gas separation performance indicated that the Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs evidently improved the CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 selectivity at the expense of a slight CO2 permeability. The results reveal that modified MOF-filled MMMs possess great potential for applications in the CO2 separation field.

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the main gases which cause global warming, corrode the natural gas pipelines, and reduce the combustion efficiency of natural gas. To overcome these problems, the effective separation of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 has become a hot research topic in recent years. Compared to other separation technologies such as cryogenic techniques, chemical adsorption [1], physical adsorption [2], and adsorption–separation [3], membrane separation has evolved as an important CO2 separation method owing to its low energy consumption, simple operation, low cost, and the absence of a phase transition during the separation process [4,5,6]. Polymer membranes are regarded as an effective media for the separation of gaseous mixtures accounting for a high separation efficiency, low running costs, and simple operating procedures. Nevertheless, the traditional polymer membranes for the gas separation have a near-universal trade-off phenomenon between the permeability and selectivity, as demonstrated by Robeson [7].
Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) consisting of a polymer as the continuous phase and an inorganic filler as the dispersed phase can overcome Robeson’s upper-bound trade-off limit. The fillers embedded in the polymer matrix are classified into conventional fillers (zeolites [8], silicas [9], and metal oxides) and alternative fillers (carbon nanotubes (CNTs), metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and graphene [8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]). These fillers may lead to the development of high-performance membranes based on the properties and functionalization of fillers. However, still many problems should be solved for large-scale industrial production of MMMs. One of the most important problems is the generation of non-selective voids because of the incompatibility between the fillers and polymer matrix at the interface, which decreases the overall gas separation efficiency of the membrane.
MOFs are highly attractive for applications in the gas separation membranes because of high surface areas, large porosity, and high functionality compared to other fillers [19,20,21]. Moreover, the organic linkers in MOFs have a better affinity for the polymer chains compared to other fillers, and the surface properties of MOFs can be easily regulated by functionalization with various organic molecules [22]. The addition of MOFs in mixed matrix membranes can effectively control the interface morphology between the fillers and polymer matrix; this decreases the occurrence of defective morphologies [23]. However, there were still some nonselective voids present at the interface of MOFs and polymers attributed to the artifacts created during the sample preparation [24], which were unfavorable for the gas separation. To improve the MOF–polymer interfacial interactions, effective MOF modification techniques have been developed in the past few years, including the use of silane coupling agents [25] and particle fusion [26]. However, it is still challenging to achieve the desired interfacial morphology and improve the gas separation properties of MMMs. Synthesis of amine-modified and submicrometer-sized MOF crystals provides effective approaches to solve these problems [27,28,29].
Besides the fillers, it is equally important to select a suitable polymer for enhancing the separation properties of prepared membranes. Polyether-block-amide (Pebax) as a commercial thermoplastic elastomer is known for its selective penetration of CO2 over other light gases such as H2, N2, and CH4 based on the interactions between ethylene oxide (EO) units and CO2 [30]. Furthermore, Pebax is composed of polyoxyalkylene glycols (such as poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(tetramethylene oxide) (PTMO)) and dicarboxylic acid terminated aliphatic polyamides (such as nylon-6 (PA6) and nylon-12 (PA12)). It has been known that the hard polyamide segment is favorable to improve the mechanical properties of the membranes, and the flexible polyether segment provides the passageway for the gas to permeate [31,32], therefore, different grades of Pebax can be obtained by varying the type and content of the segment.
In this study, Cu-BTC crystals were fabricated using the hydrothermal method. Then amine-modified Cu-BTC (NH2-Cu-BTC) was prepared using the replacing ligands, and submicrometer-sized amine-modified Cu-BTC (sub-NH2-Cu-BTC) was prepared using the “coordination modulation method” (with sodium formate as the modulator). Three kinds of MOFs and Pebax-1657 were employed as the dispersed phase and the continuous phase, respectively, to prepare Pebax/Cu-BTC, Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC, and Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs using the solution-casting method. It was expected that the dispersion of NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC would be more homogeneous by amino functionalization, and the size of the crystals would be reduced. The chemical structure and morphology of the MOFs were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The aggregate morphology of MOFs in a Pebax matrix was studied by SEM analysis. The permeability of pure gases in a Pebax membrane and Pebax/MOFs MMMs was determined by the constant volume–variable pressure approach. The corresponding separation mechanism of MOFs in MMMs for the gas separation was also discussed. Moreover, the effects of functionalized Cu-BTC on the solubility and diffusivity selectivity were systematically investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Pebax-1657 was purchased from Arkema Inc. (Paris, France). The main ligands 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC) and 2-aminoterephthalic acid (NH2-BDC) with 98% purity were supplied by Aladdin (Shanghai, China) and Macklin (Shanghai, China), respectively. Copper (II) nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O) and sodium formate (HCOONa) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ethanol and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and used as solvents without any purification.

2.2. Synthesis of MOFs

Cu-BTC was synthesized by adding 2.4 g Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, 1.2 g BTC, 20 mL bi-distilled water, 20 mL ethanol, and 20 mL DMF in a beaker, followed by stirring for 30 min and heating in a Teflon-lined steel autoclave at 85 °C for 20 h. Then, the obtained crystals were washed with DMF and first dried at 60 °C overnight and then dried at 120 °C for a day. NH2-Cu-BTC was synthesized in a similar manner as Cu-BTC except by replacing 25 wt.% BTC ligands with NH2-BDC in the initial synthesis compound using a mixture of 0.3 g NH2-BDC and 0.9 g BTC as the ligands. Sub-NH2-Cu-BTC was synthesized in a similar manner as NH2-Cu-BTC except by adding 0.1 g sodium formate to the reaction mixture.

2.3. Fabrication of MMMs

Pristine Pebax membrane and Pebax/MOFs MMMs were prepared using the conventional solution-casting method. To prepare a 4 wt.% solution of Pebax, 1.61 g Pebax pellets were dissolved in a mixture of 70 wt.% ethanol and 30 wt.% water under reflux at 80 °C for 2 h. Then, various quantities of MOFs (0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 wt.%) treated with different processes were sonicated in the Pebax solution described above for 30 min. The mixture was stirred for an additional 2 h at room temperature to obtain homogeneous dispersions containing different amounts of Cu-BTC, NH2-Cu-BTC, and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC. Then, the solutions were degassed by keeping them at room temperature for 10 h and cast on a flat glass plate. The obtained membranes were air-dried at ambient temperature for 24 h to complete the solvent evaporation. Finally, the membranes were placed in a vacuum oven for an additional 24 h to further ensure the complete removal of the residual solvent. The thickness of all MMMs was approximately 15–20 μm.

2.4. Characterization

The morphology of both MOF particles and MMMs was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were each coated with gold before the SEM measurements. To observe the cross-sections, the MMMs were cryogenically fractured in liquid nitrogen prior to coating with gold. The FTIR spectra of pristine and modified Cu-BTC were obtained using a BRUKER TENSORII FT-IR spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA) in the wavenumber range 4000−600 cm−1. The XRD spectra of pristine and functionalized Cu-BTC, pristine Pebax membrane, and the MMMs incorporated with MOFs were obtained using a PANalytical X’Pert PRO Materials Research diffractometer (Almelo, The Netherlands) using a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 40 mA. The X-rays (λ = 1.5418 Å) were generated from a Cu Kα source. Each pattern was collected in the 2θ range 5–40° in the repetition mode (three times) with a total duration of approximately 0.4 h at selected times of hydration. To investigate the thermal stability of MOFs, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out under air flow using a TA instrument (NETZSCH STA 449F5, Selb, Germany). All MOFs were heated from 25 °C to 1000 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The adsorption capacity of CO2, N2, and CH4 for the MOFs were measured by ASAP-2020 gas adsorption tester produced by Ningbo Oppe Instruments Co., Ltd. (Ningbo, China). The crystals were immersed in dichloromethane and methanol for three days (the solvents were changed once a day), then filtered for 5 h at 60 °C. Then the adsorption amount of CO2, N2, and CH4 of the MOFs was measured at 308 K. The nitrogen adsorption of the MOFs was characterized by ASAP2020M specific surface area and a micropore physical adsorption analyzer produced by Micromeritics Company (Atlanta, GA, USA) at 77 K, with a sample quantity of 0.617 g. Considering the influence of MOFs’ gas adsorption capacity on the selective CO2 permeability performance of MMMs, the gas uptake of pristine and functionalized Cu-BTC was also measured. Before the measurement, the as-synthesized crystal samples were immersed in methanol to exchange the uncoordinated DMF, ethanol, and water molecules. Then, the samples were dried at 60 °C under high vacuum for 3 h to obtain the activated samples.

2.5. Procedure for Gas Permeability Measurements

Pure gas (CO2, N2, and CH4) permeability measurements were carried out using a pressure permeability tester (Labthink Instruments, Jinan, China). The experiments were performed at 25 °C. A circular membrane with an effective area of 4.95 cm2 was mounted in a permeation cell prior to degassing the entire apparatus. Gas permeability coefficients (P) can be calculated as follows [33]:
P = 273 76 × V L A T p 0 × d p d t
where P is the permeability of a membrane to a gas, and its unit is Barrer (1 Barrer = 1 × 10−10 cm3 cm cm−2 s−1 cm Hg−1); V is the volume of the down-stream chamber (cm3); L and A are the thickness (cm) and effective area of the membrane (cm2), respectively; T is the experimental temperature (K); p0 is the pressure in cmHg of the gas in the upstream chamber, and dp/dt is the rate of pressure increase at the low-pressure chamber (the permeate side). The absolute temperature of 0 °C and standard atmospheric pressure are 273 K and 76 cm Hg, respectively. For the permeation measurement, the values were repeated at least three times to verify the reproducibility, and the relative standard deviation was within 5%.
The apparent diffusion coefficient (D) was obtained from the Equation (2):
D = L 2 6 θ
where θ is the lag time when a steady dp/dt rate is obtained on the downstream side.
The ideal selectivity αA/B can be defined as follows:
α A / B = P A P B
where PA and PB represent the permeability of gases A and B, respectively. Here, PA and PB are the permeability of pure gas CO2 and N2, or CO2 and CH4 (Barrer), respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of MOFs

3.1.1. SEM

The morphological features of the pristine and functionalized MOFs were investigated by SEM, shown in Figure 1. The pristine Cu-BTC is in the form of cube-shaped crystals [23] with a particle size of ~18 μm. After the amino functionalization, the crystal size and shape of NH2-Cu-BTC displays no substantial change compared to the Cu-BTC crystal, whereas some whisker-like roughness is observed on the crystal surface [27]. The roughness of the crystal surface is mainly due to the replacement of a part of the BTC ligand with NH2-BDC, and the addition of NH2-BDC leads to the secondary nucleation on the crystal surface, which causes the crystal surface become rougher. With the addition of a certain amount of sodium formate, the size of the sub-NH2-Cu-BTC crystals leads to a decrease from the original size of 18 to 2 μm, whereas the shape and surface texture of crystals has no apparent variation.

3.1.2. FTIR

The FTIR experiment was conducted to determine the functional groups present on the surface of the MOFs. Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra of pristine Cu-BTC, NH2-Cu-BTC, and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC powders in the wavenumber range of 3500–700 cm−1. For the pristine Cu-BTC, the peaks at the wavenumber 1645 cm−1 and 1448 cm−1 correspond to the C-C skeletal vibration of benzene groups in the BTC linker and the asymmetric COO stretching, respectively [34]. The peak at 1110 cm−1 corresponds to C-O-Cu stretching [35], and the band around 764 cm−1 represents Cu substitution on benzene groups. The new peak appearance at 1594 cm−1 in the NH2-Cu-BTC crystal can be attributed to the asymmetric COO band of the carboxylate group of BDC in the presence of DMF [36], confirming the presence of BDC linker in NH2-MOF. The middle peak at 1545 cm−1 is representative of the C-N bond, and the peak intensity indicates the existence of primary amine and no secondary amine. In addition, a peak appears at 1153 cm−1 in correspondence to the stretching of C-N bond, and the two peaks at 3148 cm−1 and 3231 cm−1 are attributed to N-H, further proving the existence of amino groups in NH2-Cu-BTC. For the sub-NH2-Cu-BTC powder shown in (c) of Figure 2, the FTIR spectrum is almost the same as that of NH2-Cu-BTC powder, which indicates that the modified submicrometer method only reduces the crystal size without changing the functional groups on the crystal surface.

3.1.3. XRD

To investigate the effects of different modification methods on the crystal structure of MOFs, the as-synthesized MOFs were characterized by XRD. Figure 3 indicates that the three types of MOFs have highly crystalline structures. The sharp peaks at 2θ 5.8, 6.7, 9.4, 11.6, 13.4, 17.4, and 19.0° confirm the ordered crystalline structure of Cu-BTC, which is consistent with the reported XRD spectra of MOFs in the literature [27]. The addition of a new ligand containing an –NH2 functional group in the spectra of the NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC has no obvious effect on the XRD spectra, which indicates that the modification does not affect the crystal structure of the MOFs. After the functionalization modification, the intensity of Cu-BTC significantly increased, indicating that the crystallinity of the MOFs has been improved. The reason for the increase of the peak intensity may be due to the increase of crystallinity caused by the two nucleation process after the addition of NH2-BDC as ligands.

3.1.4. Thermal Properties

TGA is an important method to investigate the effect of different modification methods on the thermal stability of MOFs. The weight loss curves of the as-prepared MOFs are shown in Figure 4. The weight loss curve of pristine Cu-BTC and NH2-Cu-BTC showed that about 10 wt.% of the material was lost at 100 °C. This can be attributed to the trapped solvent in the pores and the presence of water on the surface of the crystals. The crystals remain stable up to 300 °C, as reported earlier [37], and above this temperature, the crystals start to decompose. Submicrometer-sized NH2-Cu-BTC crystals follow a similar trend except that the weight loss at 100 °C is slightly smaller. The reason for this is that the amount of residual solvent in the sub-NH2-Cu-BTC crystals is lower than that of the Cu-BTC and NH2-Cu-BTC due to the smaller pore volume of crystals.

3.1.5. Gas Adsorption Measurements

Figure 5 shows the CO2, N2, and CH4 adsorption isotherms of the MOFs at 308 K, and Table 1 shows the physical and textural properties of pristine and functionalized Cu-BTC including the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, Langmuir surface area, pore volume, and the maximum adsorption amounts of CO2, CH4, and N2. According to the results of the N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K, the amount of N2 adsorbed by Cu-BTC is significantly higher than that absorbed by NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC. This indicates that Cu-BTC has a higher BET surface area and micropore volume, as shown in Table 1. The CO2 uptake of three types of MOFs significantly increases with the increase in adsorption pressure owing to the strong interactions between the positive charges on the unsaturated open Cu metal and the quadrupolar CO2 molecules. The amount of CO2 adsorbed per unit mass is higher than that of N2 and CH4, and the amounts of CO2 adsorbed by sub-NH2-Cu-BTC and NH2-Cu-BTC are 23.99 cc/g and 21.01 cc/g, respectively, higher than the amount of CO2 absorbed by Cu-BTC (11.62 cc/g). This behavior is inconsistent with the BET results shown in Table 1, suggesting that the micropore volume of NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC reduced compared to Cu-BTC due to the partial substitution of BTC linker with NH2-BDC. This can be attributed to the presence of primary amino groups in the porous structure, creating an electric field inside the pores against more polarizable adsorbates. In addition, the free primary amine present in NH2-Cu-BTC formed a carbamate with the CO2, providing a high energy efficiency [38], which is favorable to improve the CO2 separation. The increase of N2 and CH4 adsorption capacity is due to the increase of the surface roughness after the amine functionalization.

3.2. Characterization of MMMs

3.2.1. SEM

The dispersion of MOF particles within the polymer matrix and the internal microstructure of MMMs were characterized from the cross-section SEM images shown in Figure 6. It can clearly be seen that the Pebax membrane is smooth and defect-free. The introduction of Cu-BTC has a significant effect on the membrane morphology. The void spaces emerge between the Cu-BTC particles and polymeric matrix based on the poor distribution of the unmodified Cu-BTC particles in the polymer matrix and have poor compatibility with the polymer matrix. The cross-section SEM images of the MMMs incorporated with NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC show that the MOFs inside the polymer matrix are defect-free and have good compatibility. A better adhesion of the NH2-Cu-BTC surface with the Pebax matrix can be attributed to the formation of hydrogen bonding between the amine groups of NH2-Cu-BTC and the hydroxyl groups of Pebax. This indicates that the two modification methods improved the interface compatibility between the Pebax matrix and filler particles. However, the MOFs agglomerations and clusters are clearly observed in (f) of Figure 6 when 4 wt.% sub-NH2-Cu-BTC is incorporated into the Pebax matrix, indicating that the MOF is poorly dispersed in the polymer at higher loadings. This aggregation of MOFs would increase the void spaces between the polymer matrix and nanoparticles, which improves the CO2 and N2 permeability at the same time, leading to the deterioration of the gas separation selectivity.

3.2.2. XRD

Figure 7 shows the XRD patterns of pure Pebax and Pebax/MOFs membranes between 5° and 35° to determine their crystalline structure. The pristine Pebax membrane shows a broad peak at 16.6° of 2θ and a narrow diffraction peak at 22.6°, suggesting the semicrystalline structure of the sample [39] similar to the reported XRD pattern for the Pebax membrane in the literature [40]. In addition, the peak at 2θ = 22.6° can be attributed to the crystalline region of polyamide (PA) segment formed by hydrogen bonding [41]. For the diffraction patterns of Pebax/MOF membranes, the intensity and position of characteristic peaks of the Pebax membrane are almost constant with the incorporation of MOFs, indicating that the chain packing and intersegmental spacing of the Pebax polymer had no substantial change. Two new characteristic peaks of MOFs at 2θ = 11.6° and 17.4°, corresponding to (222) and (422), are observed at a low loading. Furthermore, Figure 7 also shows that the intensity of the two characteristic peaks of MMMs doped with NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC at 2θ = 16.6° and 22.6° slightly decreased compared to those doped with Cu-BTC. This is because the polymer crystallinity decreased due to the formation of hydrogen bonds caused by the interactions between the amine functional groups on the surface of NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC with the PEO component of Pebax.

3.3. Gas Separation Performances

The gas permeation properties of MMMs are mainly affected by the interface morphology of the continuous and dispersed phases. To investigate the effect of different types of MOFs and filler loadings on the membrane separation properties, Pebax/MOFs MMMs with different loadings of Cu-BTC, NH2-Cu-BTC, or sub-NH2-Cu-BTC were fabricated. The gas permeability and selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 at 25 °C and 0.1 MPa of the feed pressure are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. All experiments were performed at least three times, and the average results are reported. A comparable increase in the CO2 permeability of MMMs fabricated with different types of MOFs with the Pebax membrane results in an increase in the selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 than that of the pristine Pebax membrane. The CO2 permeability of MMMs increased with the increase of Cu-BTC loading, and the improved permeability can be mainly attributed to the defects at the inorganic–polymer interface. Moreover, the strong quadrupole moment of CO2 has a higher affinity with unsaturated Cu sites than N2 and CH4, but the increase in the N2 and CH4 permeability is not clear. The results are consistent with the results of N2, CO2, and CH4 adsorption measurements. Furthermore, the CH4 permeability is slightly higher than that of N2. This is probably because the critical temperature of gases decreases in the following order: CO2 (304.2 K) > CH4 (190.7 K) > N2 (126.1 K). A higher condensability shows a higher solubility of the gas in the polymer matrix [32], which results in a higher permeability. Therefore, the selectivity of CO2/N2 is higher than that of CO2/CH4. The selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 also increased with the increase in Cu-BTC loading. However, above the Cu-BTC loading of 4 wt.%, both the selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 of MMMs decreased due to poor compatibility and presence of nonselective voids at the inorganic-polymer interface.
Figure 9 and Table 2 show that the MMMs incorporated with NH2-Cu-BTC exhibit a higher selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 compared to that doped with pristine Cu-BTC at the expense of CO2 permeability. The decreased permeability can be attributed to the good compatibility between the amine functionalized fillers and Pebax [28]. The interaction between CO2 molecules and the amino groups on the surface of NH2-Cu-BTC and the decrease of nonselective voids increase the gas separation selectivity.
Furthermore, Figure 8 and Table 2 show that the CO2 permeability of MMMs incorporated with sub-NH2-Cu-BTC is higher than that of MMMs doped with NH2-Cu-BTC, but worse than that of pristine Cu-BTC. The presence of nanoparticles in the polymer matrix disrupts the chain packing and changes the structural regularity of the polymer–nanoparticle interface. Void spaces are formed due to weak compatibility at the interface of the polymer and nanoparticle phases that serve as channels to transport gas molecules more effectively. As shown in Figure 6, the MMMs incorporated with pristine Cu-BTC had worse compatibilities with the polymer matrix, which exhibited a higher CO2 permeability compared to the functionalized Cu-BTC. The permeability of MMMs doped with sub-NH2-Cu-BTC can be attributed to the smaller size of fillers after the submicrometer treatment and the presence of more amino and carboxyl groups on the crystal surface at the same loadings. Correspondingly, the MMMs incorporated with sub-NH2-Cu-BTC show a better selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4. However, at a higher MOFs loading ratio, such as the loading above 4 wt.%, the increase in the rate of CH4 and N2 permeability is higher than that of the CO2 permeability based on the void spaces between the polymer matrix and nanoparticles, which leads to the deterioration of the gas separation selectivity. Compared with results reported in other literature, which directly incorporated pristine MOFs or amine functionalized MOFs [19,42], we found that the dispersion of functionalized MOFs became better in the Pebax matrix if the crystal size was effectively regulated. The CO2 permeability in the Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC was 303% higher than neat Pebax due to the fine dispersion and the presence of groups with a superior CO2-philicity in the framework. The ideal selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 was equally higher than that of the neat matrix.
According to the solution-diffusion model, gas permeation through a dense membrane depends on the diffusivity coefficient (D) and solubility coefficient (S). To further elucidate the role of fillers in gas permeation, the D value was calculated according to the Equation (2) and S values of the membranes were calculated according to the equation S = P/D. The diffusivity and solubility selectivities of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 of a pristine Pebax membrane and MMMs at 25 °C and 0.1 MPa are shown in Table 3. It can clearly be seen that both the CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 diffusivity selectivities of these MMMs containing MOFs have no improvement compared to a pristine Pebax membrane. However, the solubility selectivities of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 are higher than those of a pristine Pebax membrane. Thus, the separation efficiency is based on the gas solubility, but not on the size differences. The unsaturated Cu sites and carboxyl groups of Cu-BTC enhance the affinity with CO2 molecules, and after the amination functionalization, the amide groups of the MOFs further increase the solubility selectivity of the MMMs due to the Lewis acid-base interactions with CO2 molecules. Besides, it is important to note that the introduction of primary amino groups on the MOFs leads to the formation of reactivity-selective membranes. Therefore, the extremely high CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 selectivities of the MMMs can be attributed to the solubility selectivity.
Figure 10 shows the trade-off lines between the selectivity and permeability for CO2/N2 separation (Robeson plot). The performance data of CO2 and N2 of a pristine Pebax membrane falls far below the updated upper bound reported in 2008 [7]. The Cu-BTC and NH2-Cu-BTC containing membranes are close to or surpass the upper bound plot, and the MMMs incorporated with sub-NH2-Cu-BTC clearly surpass that line. This demonstrates the promising performance of submicrometer-functionalized Cu-BTC compared to the untreated Cu-BTC in the CO2 separation field.

4. Conclusions

In this work, MMMs based on Pebax and Cu-BTC particles (including Cu-BTC, NH2-Cu-BTC, and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC) were fabricated using the solution-casting method. SEM analysis showed that the surface roughness of NH2-Cu-BTC clearly increased, and the size of sub-NH2-Cu-BTC clearly decreased. The resulting fine dispersion of MOFs throughout the Pebax matrix and a strong interfacial adhesion between the modified MOFs and the polymer matrix were obtained. FTIR analysis confirmed that the amine modification introduced amino functional groups (–NH2) on the surface of Cu-BTC. The XRD patterns obtained to establish the consistency of the crystal structure indicated that the modification process had no influence on the crystal structure of the MOFs. The order of different MOFs’ adsorption capacities of N2, CH4, and CO2 obtained by gas adsorption measurements at 308 K indicated that amine modification and submicrometer-sized amine modification were favorable for the increase of the gas adsorbability of MOFs. TGA showed that the crystals of three kinds of MOFs remained stable up to 300 °C. Gas separation performance showed that the MMMs with NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC represented a better gas separation selectivity than that of MMMs incorporated with the pristine Cu-BTC, and the separation selectivity increased with the increase in MOF loading at low MOF contents. This can be attributed to the fine dispersion of NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC and the presence of amino functional groups. However, the gas permeability of NH2-Cu-BTC and sub-NH2-Cu-BTC was slightly sacrificed because of the decrease in interfacial voids between the MOFs and the Pebax matrix. The promising performance of submicrometer-functionalized Cu-BTC in the fabrication of polymer membranes for effective CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 separation was demonstrated.

Author Contributions

H.S. conceived and designed the experiments; B.G., Y.X. and H.Z. performed the experiments; B.G. and H.S. analyzed the data; Y.G. and W.W. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; all authors contributed to the writing of the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2016YFE0106700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21406268), the Province Key Research and Development Program of Shandong (2016GSF115032), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (18CX05006A & 16CX05009A).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yue, M.B.; Chun, Y.; Cao, Y.; Dong, X.; Zhu, J.H. CO2 capture by as-prepared SBA-15 with an occluded organic template. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 1717–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Satyapal, S.; Filburn, T.; Trela, J.; Strange, J. Performance and properties of a solid amine sorbent for carbon dioxide removal in space life support applications. Energy Fuels 2001, 15, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lua, A.C.; Shen, Y. Preparation and characterization of polyimide-silica composite membranes and their derived carbon–silica composite membranes for gas separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vorotyntsev, V.M.; Drozdov, P.N.; Vorotyntsev, I.V. High purification of substances by a gas separation method. Desalination 2009, 240, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zornoza, B.; Irusta, S.; Téllez, C.; Coronas, J. Mesoporous silica sphere-polysulfone mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Langmuir 2009, 25, 5903–5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ho, W.S.W.; Sirkar, K.K. Membrane Handbook; Kluwer Academic Publisher: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 1–998. [Google Scholar]
  7. Robeson, L.M. The upper bound revisited. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barankova, E.; Pradeep, N.; Peinemann, K.V. Zeolite-imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) membrane synthesis on a mixed-matrix substrate. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9419–9421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zornoza, B.; Téllez, C.; Coronas, J. Mixed matrix membranes comprising glassy polymers and dispersed mesoporous silica spheres for gas separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 368, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Huang, S.; Wu, H.; Li, Y.; Tian, Z.; Jiang, Z. Pebax-PEG-MWCNT hybrid membranes with enhanced CO2 capture properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 460, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; Peng, D.; He, G.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; Jiang, Z. Enhanced CO2 permeability of membranes by incorporating polyzwitterion@CNT composite particles into polyimide matrix. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 13051–13060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lin, R.; Ge, L.; Hou, L.; Strounina, E.; Rudolph, V.; Zhu, Z. Mixed matrix membranes with strengthened MOFs/polymer interfacial interaction and improved membrane performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 5609–5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gomes, D.; Nunes, S.P.; Peinemann, K.V. Membranes for gas separation based on poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne)-silica nanocomposites. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 246, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ahn, J.; Chung, W.J.; Pinnau, I.; Song, J.; Du, N.; Robertson, G.P.; Guiver, M.D. Gas transport behavior of mixed-matrix membranes composed of silica nanoparticles in a polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1). J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 346, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Arjmandi, M.; Pakizeh, M. Mixed matrix membranes incorporated with cubic-MOF-5 for improved polyetherimide gas separation membranes: Theory and experiment. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 3857–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, Y.; Jung, B.T.; Ansaloni, L.; Ho, W.S.W. Multiwalled carbon nanotube mixed matrix membranes containing amines for high pressure CO2/H2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 459, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, L.; Tao, K.; Huang, A.; Kong, C.; Chen, L. A highly permeable mixed matrix membrane containing CAU-1-NH2 for H2 and CO2 separation. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8513–8515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vanherck, K.; Aerts, A.; Martens, J.; Vankelecom, L. Hollow filler based mixed matrix membranes. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2492–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, H.; Tuo, L.; Yang, K.; Jeong, H.; Dai, Y.; He, G.; Zhao, W. Simultaneous enhancement of mechanical properties and CO2 selectivity of ZIF-8 mixed matrix membranes: Interfacial toughening effect of ionic liquid. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 511, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Erucar, I.; Yilmaz, G.; Keskin, S. Recent advances in metal–organic framework-based mixed matrix membranes. Chem. Asian J. 2013, 8, 1692–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Seoane, B.; Coronas, J.; Gascon, I.; Benavides, M.E.; Karvan, O.; Caro, J.; Kapteijn, F.; Gascon, J. Metal-organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: A solution for highly efficient CO2 capture? Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2421–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, Z.Q.; Cohen, S.M. Postsynthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1315–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Basu, S.; Cano-Odena, A.; Vankelecom, I.F.J. Asymmetric Matrimid®/[Cu3(BTC)2] mixed-matrix membranes for gas separations. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 362, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Basu, S.; Cano-Odena, A.; Vankelecom, I.F.J. MOF-containing mixed-matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 binary gas mixture separations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 81, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Basu, S.; Maes, M.; Cano-Odena, A.; Alaerts, L.; Vos, L.A.D.; Vankelecom, I. Solvent resistant nanofiltration (SRNF) membranes based on metal-organic frameworks. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 344, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shahid, S.; Nijmeijer, K.; Nehache, S.; Vankelecom, I.; Deratani, A.; Quemener, D. MOF-mixed matrix membranes: Precise dispersion of MOF particles with better compatibility via a particle fusion approach for enhanced gas separation properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 492, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nik, O.G.; Chen, K.X.Y.; Kaliaguine, S. Functionalized metal organic framework-polyimide mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 413–414, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bae, T.H.; Lee, J.S.; Qiu, W.; Koros, W.J.; Jones, C.W.; Nair, S. A high-performance gas-separation membrane containing submicrometer-sized metal-organic framework crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9863–9866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Khan, N.A.; Haque, M.M.; Jhung, S.H. Accelerated syntheses of porous isostructural lanthanide-benzenetricarboxylates (Ln–BTC) under ultrasound at room. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 2010, 4975–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, H.Q.; Freeman, B.D. Materials selection guidelines for membranes that remove CO2 from gas mixtures. J. Mol. Struct. 2005, 739, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tocci, E.; Gugliuzza, A.; Lorenzo, L.D.; Macchione, M.; Luca, G.D.; Drioli, E. Transport properties of a co-poly(amide-12-b-ethyleneoxide) membrane: A comparative study between experimental and molecular modelling results. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 323, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reijerkerk, S.R.; Knoef, M.H.; Nijmeijer, K.; Wessling, M. Poly(ethyleneglycol) and poly(dimethylsiloxane): Combining their advantages into efficient CO2 gas separation membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 352, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, H.; Ma, C.; Yuan, B.; Wang, T.; Xu, Y.; Xue, Q.; Li, P.; Kong, Y. Cardo polyimides/TiO2 mixed matrix membranes: Synthesis, characterization, and gas separation property improvement. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 122, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hadjiivanov, K.I.; Vayssilov, G.N. Characterization of oxide surfaces and zeolites by carbon monoxide as an IR probe molecule. Adv. Catal. 2002, 47, 307–511. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hu, J.; Cai, H.; Ren, H.; Wei, Y.; Xu, Z.; Liu, H.; Hu, Y. Mixed-matrix membrane hollow fibers of Cu3(BTC)2 MOF and polyimide for gas separation and adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 12605–12612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Carson, C.G.; Hardcastle, K.; Schwartz, J.; Liu, X.; Hoffmann, C.; Gerhardt, R.A.; Tannenbaum, R. Synthesis and structure characterization of copper terephthalate metal-organic frameworks. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 16, 2338–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Q.M.; Shen, D.; Bulow, M.; Lau, M.L.; Deng, S.; Fitch, F.R.; Lemcoff, N.O.; Semanscin, J. Metallo-organic molecular sieve for gas separation and purification. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2002, 55, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, Y.; Ho, W.S.W. Steric hindrance effect on amine demonstrated in solid polymer membranes for CO2 transport. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415–416, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xiang, L.; Pan, Y.; Zeng, G.; Jiang, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, C. Preparation of poly(ether-block-amide)/attapulgite mixed matrix membranes for CO2/N2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 500, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, D.; Ren, J.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Deng, M. Gas separation properties of poly(amide-6-b- ethyleneoxide)/amino, modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 467, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, J.H.; Ha, S.Y.; Lee, Y.M. Gas permeation of poly(amide-6-b-ethyleneoxide) copolymer. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 190, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Meshkat, S.; Kaliaguine, S.; Rodrigue, D. Mixed matrix membranes based on amine and non-amine MIL-53(Al) in Pebax® MH-1657 for CO2 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 200, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 11 01421 g001 550
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the surface of (a,b) pristine Cu-BTC, (c,d) NH2-Cu-BTC and (e,f) sub-NH2-Cu-BTC. Note BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid.
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the surface of (a,b) pristine Cu-BTC, (c,d) NH2-Cu-BTC and (e,f) sub-NH2-Cu-BTC. Note BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid.
Materials 11 01421 g001
Materials 11 01421 g002 550
Figure 2. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (a) Cu-BTC, (b) NH2-Cu-BTC and (c) sub-NH2-Cu-BTC.
Figure 2. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (a) Cu-BTC, (b) NH2-Cu-BTC and (c) sub-NH2-Cu-BTC.
Materials 11 01421 g002
Materials 11 01421 g003 550
Figure 3. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) Cu-BTC, (b) NH2-Cu-BTC and (c) sub-NH2-Cu-BTC.
Figure 3. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) Cu-BTC, (b) NH2-Cu-BTC and (c) sub-NH2-Cu-BTC.
Materials 11 01421 g003
Materials 11 01421 g004 550
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of (a) Cu-BTC, (b) NH2-Cu-BTC and (c) sub-NH2-Cu-BTC.
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of (a) Cu-BTC, (b) NH2-Cu-BTC and (c) sub-NH2-Cu-BTC.
Materials 11 01421 g004
Materials 11 01421 g005 550
Figure 5. CO2, N2, and CH4 adsorption isotherms of Cu-BTC at 308 K.
Figure 5. CO2, N2, and CH4 adsorption isotherms of Cu-BTC at 308 K.
Materials 11 01421 g005
Materials 11 01421 g006 550
Figure 6. The SEM images of cross-section of (a) polyether-block-amide (Pebax) membrane, (b) Pebax/Cu-BTC mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) (3 wt.% MOF content in the MMMs), (c) Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs (3wt.% MOF content in the MMMs), (d) Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs (3 wt.% metal-organic framework (MOF) content in the MMMs), (e) the low magnification of (d) and (f) Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs (4 wt.% MOF content in the MMMs).
Figure 6. The SEM images of cross-section of (a) polyether-block-amide (Pebax) membrane, (b) Pebax/Cu-BTC mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) (3 wt.% MOF content in the MMMs), (c) Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs (3wt.% MOF content in the MMMs), (d) Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs (3 wt.% metal-organic framework (MOF) content in the MMMs), (e) the low magnification of (d) and (f) Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs (4 wt.% MOF content in the MMMs).
Materials 11 01421 g006
Materials 11 01421 g007 550
Figure 7. The XRD patterns of (a) pure Pebax membrane, (b) Pebax/Cu-BTC MMMs, (c) Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs and (d) Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs (3 wt.% MOFs content in the MMMs).
Figure 7. The XRD patterns of (a) pure Pebax membrane, (b) Pebax/Cu-BTC MMMs, (c) Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs and (d) Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC MMMs (3 wt.% MOFs content in the MMMs).
Materials 11 01421 g007
Materials 11 01421 g008 550
Figure 8. Effects of the MOFs loading level on the gas permeability of MMMs.
Figure 8. Effects of the MOFs loading level on the gas permeability of MMMs.
Materials 11 01421 g008
Materials 11 01421 g009 550
Figure 9. Effects of MOFs loading level on the gas separation selectivity.
Figure 9. Effects of MOFs loading level on the gas separation selectivity.
Materials 11 01421 g009
Materials 11 01421 g010 550
Figure 10. CO2/N2 separation performance of pure Pebax (□), Pebax/Cu-BTC (▲), Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC (◆) and Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC (★) MMMs in Robeson upper bound plot (2008).
Figure 10. CO2/N2 separation performance of pure Pebax (□), Pebax/Cu-BTC (▲), Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC (◆) and Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC (★) MMMs in Robeson upper bound plot (2008).
Materials 11 01421 g010
Table
Table 1. Physical and textural properties of Cu-BTC.
Table 1. Physical and textural properties of Cu-BTC.
SampleSBET (m2/g)SLangmuir (m2/g)Pore Volume (m3/g)CO2 Adsorption Amount (cc/g)CH4 Adsorption Amount (cc/g)N2 Adsorption Amount (cc/g)
Cu-BTC101811910.4811.626.050.67
NH2-Cu-BTC7978470.3921.018.611.11
sub-NH2-Cu-BTC7187240.3523.998.941.87
Table
Table 2. Gas permeability and CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 selectivity of the prepared membranes.
Table 2. Gas permeability and CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 selectivity of the prepared membranes.
Type of MembranePermeability (Barrer)Selectivity
N2CH4CO2CO2/N2CO2/CH4
Pebax0.711.8926.8938.0014.24
Pebax/Cu-BTC2.167.35119.355.1316.23
Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC1.423.3386.5860.8825.97
Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC1.643.73108.566.2729.05
3 wt.% MOFs content in MMMs.
Table
Table 3. Diffusivity and solubility selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4.
Table 3. Diffusivity and solubility selectivity of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4.
Type of MembraneDCO2/DN2DCO2/CH4SCO2/N2SCO2/CH4
Pebax2.013.1319.024.55
Pebax/Cu-BTC2.043.4127.024.76
Pebax/NH2-Cu-BTC1.983.7730.756.89
Pebax/sub-NH2-Cu-BTC2.013.9232.977.41
3 wt.% MOFs Content in MMMs.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ge, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Sun, H.; Guo, Y.; Wang, W. High Performance Gas Separation Mixed Matrix Membrane Fabricated by Incorporation of Functionalized Submicrometer-Sized Metal-Organic Framework. Materials 2018, 11, 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081421

AMA Style

Ge B, Xu Y, Zhao H, Sun H, Guo Y, Wang W. High Performance Gas Separation Mixed Matrix Membrane Fabricated by Incorporation of Functionalized Submicrometer-Sized Metal-Organic Framework. Materials. 2018; 11(8):1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ge, Baosheng, Yanyan Xu, Haoru Zhao, Haixiang Sun, Yaoli Guo, and Wenguang Wang. 2018. "High Performance Gas Separation Mixed Matrix Membrane Fabricated by Incorporation of Functionalized Submicrometer-Sized Metal-Organic Framework" Materials 11, no. 8: 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081421

APA Style

Ge, B., Xu, Y., Zhao, H., Sun, H., Guo, Y., & Wang, W. (2018). High Performance Gas Separation Mixed Matrix Membrane Fabricated by Incorporation of Functionalized Submicrometer-Sized Metal-Organic Framework. Materials, 11(8), 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop