#
Geometrical Structures and Electronic Properties of Ga_{6} and Ga_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) Clusters

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

_{6}and Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) clusters. The PBE0 exchange-correlation functional and the 6-311G(d) basis set is carried out to determine global minima on potential energy surfaces. The relative stabilities of the clusters are examined by the binding energies and substitution reaction. Following the predictions of the Jellium model, the Ga

_{5}B cluster with the 18 valence electrons is the most stable structure. At last, with the obtained lowest energy structures, some physical properties such as electrons transfer, molecular orbitals, and total and partial densities of states are discussed, respectively.

## 1. Introduction

_{n}clusters containing up to 26 atoms have been calculated with generalized gradient approximation for the exchange-correlation potential [4]. By a simulated annealing technique with ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) method, Gong and Tosatti determined the lowest energy structures of small Ga

_{n}(n ≤ 8) clusters [6]. The atomic structure, structural transformation, and reactivity of Ga

_{13}clusters were investigated by the first principles’ pseudopotential calculations [7]. With a similar approach, Jones obtained the most stable structures of Ga

_{n}cluster up to n = 10 [9]. Based on eight different density functional theory and hybrid DFT/Hartree–Fock methods, the structures, dissociation energies and electron affinities of the anionic and neutral gallium clusters were calculated by Zhao et al. [10]. For the experimental research, photoelectron spectra of small anionic gallium clusters were presented in the size range of n = 1–15 [12]. Results show that a change in the pattern of the spectra near n = 6 can be predicted as a transition from planar to compact three-dimensional structures. A study of the electronic spectrum of the gallium dimer was presented in the range of 33,600–36,800 cm

^{−1}[13]. In addition, Himmel et al. have characterized isolated Ga

_{2}dimers in an argon matrix with the aid of resonance Raman and UV/Vis spectroscopy [14]. Then, Balducci et al. characterized the dissociation energies of Ga

_{2}cluster, which derived from the Knudsen cell-mass spectrometric [15].

_{6}clusters, the introduction of a doped atom in Ga

_{6}clusters can change undoubtedly its geometrical structures and electronic properties, and further affect its chemical and physical properties significantly. A number of gallium clusters doped with a single X (X = N, O, F, Al, Si, P) atom have been observed and studied [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Based on the density functional theory (DFT), Costales et al. have studied the structures of Ga

_{n}N

_{n}(n = 1–6) clusters [16,17]. Combined with molecular dynamics and simulated annealing techniques, Song calculated the structures of Ga

_{n}N

_{n}(n = 3, 5, 6) clusters using a full-potential linear-muffintin-orbital method [18,19,20]. The Ga

_{n−1}Al

^{+}clusters were generated by pulsed laser ablation of a liquid aluminum/gallium alloy [21]. By an all-electron linear combination of atomic orbital approach, low-lying isomers of Ga

_{n}Al (n = 1–15) clusters were reported [22]. The ground state structures, stability and electronic properties were systemically investigated for neutral, cationic and anionic Ga

_{n}O

_{n}(n = 4–7) clusters [23]. The geometrical structures, electronic states and energies of Ga

_{n}P

_{m}(n = 1–7; n = 1, 2) clusters were investigated using the density functional theory [24]. The equilibrium geometries and electronic states of Ga

_{3}Sn, GaSn

_{3}and their ions were investigated using the complete active space self consistent field (CASSCF) levels and DFT [25]. Using ab initio quantum chemistry, the feasibility of laser cooling GaF was performed. The X

^{1}∑

^{+},

^{3}∏ and

^{1}∏ states of GaF was calculated using the multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) level of theory [26]. However, a systematic study on X-doped gallium (X = B, C, S, Cl) clusters has not been reported, and some problems on the Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, S, Cl) clusters also have not been solved either. For example, how does the structure of the gallium clusters change with the X atom doped, and how can the pure gallium cluster properties be changed after doping a single X atom?

_{n}N, n = 1–9) clusters were investigated at the PBE/DNP level of theory. It is found that Ga

_{n}N (n = 3, 7, 15) clusters were particularly stable despite of the fact that these clusters do not conform to the predictions of the Jellium model because they have 14, 26 and 50 valence electrons. In addition, Rebere et al. reported that Ag

_{13}

^{−}, Ag

_{14}, and Ag

_{15}

^{+}clusters with 14 valence electrons were resistant to reactivity with O due to their large highest occupied-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) energy gaps, despite not having fully filled electronic shell configurations. Inspired by the above studies, when there are X-doped (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) gallium clusters, do the stable X-doped structures possess the magic number? Hence, it is of interest to carry on more detailed studies on the magic numbers.

_{6}and Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, Ga) clusters based on a particle swarm optimization algorithm combined with density function theory. For all of these clusters, relative stability was measured via analysis of binding energies and substitution reaction. Based on the HOMO-LUMO gaps and chemical hardness, the stable structures were determined for Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, Ga) clusters. At last, the electron transfer, molecular orbitals, and density of states are also computed and discussed.

## 2. Computational Detail

_{5}X (X= B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) and Ga

_{6}clusters. The further geometry optimizations are performed with the PBE0 functional using the 6-311G(d) basis set, as implemented in the Gaussian09 package [35]. PBE0 has been confirmed to be suitable for describing the energy difference of isomers of X-doped gallium clusters [36]. In the process of calculation, the effect of the spin multiplicity is performed in the geometric optimization procedure. Harmonic vibrational frequencies are calculated to ensure that the obtained optimized structures are real minima with no imaginary frequencies.

_{2}, the calculated dissociation energy and vibrational frequency are 1.34 eV and 214 cm

^{−1}, respectively, in excellent agreement with experimental values 1.50 eV and 180 cm

^{−1}[14,37]. To our knowledge, there is no bond length in the experiment for the Ga

_{2}dimer. The present Ga–Ga bond length (2.45 Å) is broadly consistent with the previous theoretical studies [4,6,7,9]. For GaAl and GaSi, we obtained a bond length (2.456 Å, 2.43 Å) that fits well with the theoretical values of 2.585 Å and 2.45 Å by the GGA using B3LYP function, respectively [23,38]. In addition, for Ga

_{6}cluster, the calculated vertical electron affinity (VEA) (2.12 eV) and vertical ionization potential (VIP) (6.69 eV) are close to the experimental values (2.60 eV) and theoretical vertical ionization potential (6.52 eV), respectively [12]. In short, PBE0/6-311G(d) level is able to describe the structural and electronic properties of Ga

_{6}and Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) clusters in a satisfactory manner.

## 3. Results and Discussion

#### 3.1. Lowest Energy Structures and Growth Pattern

_{6}and Ga

_{5}X clusters determined from CALYPSO and DFT calculation are displayed in Figure 1. The corresponding electronic states, symmetries and harmonic vibrational frequencies are tabulated in Table 1, and the atomic coordinates of each cluster are provided in the Supporting Information (SI) for the lowest energy structures.

_{6}cluster, the

^{3}A

_{1}′ state of the trigonal prism (D

_{3h}) is almost degenerate with the

^{1}A

_{1}state of the similar trigonal prism, and the latter is computed to be 0.003 eV lower in energy, which is a certainly insignificant amount. Our result agrees with Drebov and Jones et al.’s results [9,39]. However, Gong and Tosatti applied an ab initio molecular-dynamics method and showed the most stable structure to be a distorted prism structure with C

_{2v}point symmetry [6].

_{5}Al cluster, using the B3LYP-DFT calculations, Guo et al. predicted that the ground state is C

_{s}structure and analogous to Ga

_{6}structure, which is identical to our results [23]. Simultaneously, the calculated the vertical ionization potential (VIP) of 6.70 eV and the vertical electron affinity (VEA) of 2.13 eV in our work agree with previous DFT estimates (6.44 and 2.11 eV) calculated by Guo et al. [23].

_{n}P cluster and predicted that the ground state is the trigonal bipyramidal state (C

_{s}). From Figure 1, we can find that our result is identical to Li et al. In addition, our calculation predicted the VEA of the ground state (1.68 eV) agree with Li’s results (1.93 eV).

_{5}N cluster, in Li’s calculation, the ground state structure with C

_{2v}point symmetry is a planar structure. In our prediction, the result is similar to Li and Song’s results [20,40]. Moreover, the calculated intensity vibration and lowest frequency (631 and 27 cm

^{−1}) are close to the Li et al.’s results (672.3 and 32 cm

^{−1}) [40].

_{5}X (X = B, C, S, Cl) clusters have not been reported, the above structures are obtained and listed in Table 1. Comparing X-doped (X = B, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, and Cl) clusters, we can find that the doped atom simply replaces one Ga atom of pure Ga

_{6}cluster, leading to a reduction of the molecular symmetry for the lowest stable configurations of Ga

_{5}B(

^{1}A

_{1}), Ga

_{5}C(

^{2}A″), Ga

_{5}O(

^{2}A′), Ga

_{5}F(

^{1}A′), Ga

_{5}Al(

^{3}A″), Ga

_{5}Si(

^{2}A′), Ga

_{5}S(

^{2}A′) and Ga

_{5}Cl(

^{1}A′). On the contrary, completely new structures are formed for Ga

_{5}N(

^{1}A

_{1}) and Ga

_{5}P(

^{1}A′) clusters. In conclusion, except for Ga

_{5}N and Ga

_{5}P clusters, the dopants of lighter elements (B, C, O, F) greatly influence the structure of the pure gallium clusters; however, those of heavier elements (Al, Si, S, Cl) generally generate a minor effect.

#### 3.2. Relative Stability

_{5}X.

_{subst}), which can be expressed as:

_{6}+ X→Ga

_{5}X + Ga.

_{subst}, corrected for zero point vibrational energy, are shown with the cluster size increasing.

_{6}cluster with 18 valence electrons possesses the maximum value of the binding energy. The isoelectronic Ga

_{5}Al and Ga

_{5}B clusters are also possessed of considerably larger binding energies, indicating greater overall stability. The Ga

_{5}Al cluster has larger binding energy than that of the Ga

_{5}B cluster. Moreover, this result can be obtained for all isoelectronic X-doped systems. In general, the tendency of ∆H

_{subst}is similar to that of the binding energies, and the Ga

_{5}C cluster leads to the largest stabilizing effect (∆H

_{subst}= −3.38 eV). Theoretically, the dopants of B and Al should arouse a minor influence on the stability of the doped clusters because they are equivalent to the valence electron of the Ga atom. In fact, we find that the Al atom actually leads to an increase in stability (0.16 eV) while the B atom leads to an even greater increase in stability (2.16 eV). Doping with O and S elements leads to a 21 valence electrons system and would not be expected to lead to a significant increase in stability. However, it is clear from Figure 2 that X-doped (X = O, S) clusters increase the stability of the cluster. Generally speaking, based on the BE and ∆H

_{subst}, the stability of host Ga

_{6}clusters will indeed be enhanced by the dopants of X atoms.

#### 3.3. The HOMO-LUMO Gaps

_{gap}) can be usually used for estimating the chemical stability of the clusters. Larger values of the gaps indicate stronger chemical stability. In Table 1, we list the calculated energy gaps of the mentioned clusters. It is interesting to notice that the Ga

_{5}B, Ga

_{5}N, Ga

_{5}F, Ga

_{5}P and Ga

_{5}Cl clusters with an even number of electrons (18, 20, 22) have higher stabilities than other Ga

_{5}C, Ga

_{5}O, Ga

_{5}Si and Ga

_{5}S clusters with an odd number of electrons (19, 21). For Ga

_{5}B, Ga

_{5}N, Ga

_{5}F, Ga

_{5}P and Ga

_{5}Cl clusters, all paired electrons form a closed-shell electronic structure caused the larger energy gap of 1.87–2.88 eV. However, the Ga

_{5}C, Ga

_{5}O, Ga

_{5}Si and Ga

_{5}S clusters show a small energy gap due to the LUMO occupied by a single electron. In addition, the local maxima of E

_{gap}are found at Ga

_{5}B, suggesting that the Ga

_{5}B cluster possesses enhanced relative stability, and the clusters with 18 valence electrons are expected to be especially stable by the Jellium model.

_{5}B) of η completely accord with the above analysis based on the HOMO-LUMO gaps.

#### 3.4. Charge Transfer in the Ga_{5}X Cluster

_{5}Al clusters. The results show that the values for the X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, Cl) atoms are almost negative. This means that the charge transfers from the Ga host to X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, Cl) atoms in the corresponding clusters because of the higher electronegativity of the X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, Cl) atom than that of the Ga atom (Ga:1.81 eV, B:2.04 eV, C:2.55 eV, N:3.04 eV, O:3.44 eV, F:3.98 eV, Si:1.90 eV, P:2.19 eV, S:2.58 eV, Cl:3.16 eV) [44]. However, the electronegativity of the Ga (1.81 eV) is more than that of the Al (1.61 eV) [44]. One can see that the charge transfers from Al atoms to Ga frames in Ga

_{5}Al clusters. This fact has also been observed in a number of gallium-containing clusters in earlier reports [31].

#### 3.5. The Molecular Orbitals

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, and Cl) clusters. In an effort to obtain the specific orbital composition of every MO, the corresponding orbital compositions are also plotted in Figure S1 (see SI).

_{5}X (X = B, C, O) clusters, the HOMO involves the s, p

_{x}, p

_{y}and p

_{z}from all of Ga atoms, the s, p

_{z}of B atoms, the p

_{z}of C atoms; the contribution of p

_{y}is very small from oxygen atoms. The LUMO of Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C) cluster is composed of (s, p

_{y}, p

_{z}), (p

_{x}, p

_{y}, p

_{z}) of Ga and p

_{y}of B atoms; the effect of p

_{z}of C is very small. Moreover, the LUMO involves Ga-s, p

_{x}, p

_{y}and p

_{z}atomic orbitals as well as p

_{x}and p

_{y}from oxygen atom in Ga

_{5}O clusters. For Ga

_{5}F and Ga

_{5}Cl clusters, the HOMO mainly comes from the (s, p

_{z}) and (s, p

_{x}, p

_{z}) orbitals of Ga atoms along with small mixture of p

_{x}and p

_{y}orbitals in X (X = F, Cl) atoms. The LUMO is almost identical in Ga

_{5}F and Ga

_{5}Cl clusters. It results from the identical orbital. Gallium atoms involve s, p

_{x}, p

_{y}, and p

_{z}component orbitals; F and Cl atoms possess the same p

_{z}atomic orbitals. The HOMO of the Ga

_{5}Al and Ga

_{5}Si clusters is very similar. However, the HOMO includes the p

_{x}, p

_{y}, p

_{z}states of the Ga atoms and the s, p

_{x}, p

_{y}states of the Al atom in the Ga

_{5}Al cluster, whereas the HOMO mostly involves the p

_{x}of gallium and silicon atoms as well as a small mixture of s orbitals of the Ga and Si atoms in the Ga

_{5}Si cluster. For Ga

_{5}X (X = N, P, S) clusters, the HOMO mainly comes from the same p

_{y}, and p

_{z}orbitals of Ga atoms in Ga

_{5}N and Ga

_{5}P clusters. In LUMO, all of the atoms are composed of the p

_{x}, p

_{z}, and p

_{z}atomic orbitals in Ga

_{5}N, Ga

_{5}P, and Ga

_{5}S clusters, respectively. The contribution of N, P, and S atoms are almost zero in HOMO and LUMO. These molecular orbitals indicate the presence of sp hybridization of the X atom and Ga atoms.

#### 3.6. The Density of States

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, and Cl) and Ca

_{6}clusters are shown in Figure 4. It is clear that there is finite electronic density, mainly coming from Ga atoms, at the Fermi level for all clusters, which means that they exhibit metallic behavior. At the Fermi level, the total density of states (TDOS) of Ga

_{5}X clusters is lower than that of the Ga

_{6}cluster except for Ga

_{5}N and Ga

_{5}Si clusters. The fact indicates that the impurity atoms reduce the metallicity of the Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, O, F, Al, P, S, and Cl) clusters. The contribution of the impurity atoms primarily centralizes in the valence bands for Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, S, and Cl) clusters, and they are comparative in the valence bands and conduction band for Ga

_{5}X (X = Al, Si, and P) clusters. In addition, the HOMO energy levels shift to higher energy levels when X (X = C, N, O, F, and S) are doped gallium clusters, whereas they shift to lower energy levels when other atoms are doped gallium clusters.

## 4. Conclusions

_{6}and Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) clusters by using the CALYPSO method in combination with DFT geometry optimization. The optimized geometries reveal that the dopant atoms (B, C, O, F, Al, Si, S, and Cl) simply replace one Ga atom of pure Ga

_{6}, leading to a reduction of the molecular symmetry. However, completely new structures are formed for Ga

_{5}N and Ga

_{5}P. Trends of the binding energies and substitution reaction showed that the dopant atoms can lead to increased stability relative to Ga

_{6}clusters. Based on the HOMO-LUMO gaps and chemical harnesses, the Ga

_{5}B clusters with 18 valence electrons exhibit superior stability and can be viewed as the magic number clusters. In addition, analysis of molecular orbitals and DOS show that the HOMO and LOMO are localized around the Ga atoms, and the contribution of X atoms is almost zero. These molecular orbitals indicate the presence of sp hybridization of the X atom and Ga atoms. At last, the electrons transfer from the Ga frames to X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, Cl) atoms. On the contrary, the direction of charge transfer reverses and the amount of charges transfer from Al atoms to Ga atoms in Ga

_{5}Al clusters.

## Supplementary Materials

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) clusters.

## Acknowledgments

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Donohue, J. The Structure of the Element; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Stroud, J.D.; Stott, M.J. The electronic structure and Knight shift of β-Ga. J. Phys. F Metal Phys.
**1975**, 5, 1667–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Young, D.A. Phase Diagrams of the Elements; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Song, B.; Cao, P.L. Evolution of the geometrical and electronic structures of Ga
_{n}(n = 2–26) clusters: A density-functional theory study. J. Chem. Phys.**2005**, 123, 144–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Balasubramanian, K.; Feng, P.Y. The electronic states of Ga
_{3}. Chem. Phys. Lett.**1988**, 146, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gong, X.G.; Tosatti, E. Structure of small gallium clusters. Phys. Lett. A
**1992**, 166, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yi, J.Y. Stability, structural transformation, and reactivity of Ga
_{13}clusters. Phys. Rev. B**2000**, 61, 7277–7279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Belbruno, J.J. Bonding and energetics in small clusters of gallium and arsenic. Heteroat. Chem.
**2003**, 14, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jones, R.O. Simulated annealing study of neutral and charged clusters: Al
_{n}and Ga_{n}. J. Chem. Phys.**1993**, 99, 1194–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao, Y.; Xu, W.G.; Li, Q.S.; Xie, Y.M.; Schaefer, H.F. Gallium clusters Ga
_{n}(n = 1–6): Structures, thermochemistry, and electron affinities. J. Phys. Chem. A**2004**, 108, 7448–7459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - O’Brien, S.C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Heath, J.R.; Tittel, F.K.; Curl, R.F.; Smalley, R.E. Supersonic cluster beams of III-V semiconductors: Ga
_{x}As_{y}. J. Chem. Phys.**1986**, 84, 4074–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cha, C.; Gantefor, G.; Eberhardt, W. The development of the 3p and 4p valence band of small aluminum and gallium clusters. J. Chem. Phys.
**1994**, 100, 995–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - And, X.T.; Dagdigian, P.J. Electronic spectrum of the gallium dimer. J. Phys. Chem. A
**2003**, 107, 2642–2649. [Google Scholar] - Himmel, H.J.; Gaertner, B. Characterization of isolated Ga
_{2}molecules by resonance Raman spectroscopy and variations of Ga-Ga bonding. Chem. Eur. J.**2004**, 10, 5936–5941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Balducci, G.; Gigli, G.; Meloni, G. Dissociation energies of the Ga
_{2}, In_{2}, and GaIn molecules. J. Chem. Phys.**1998**, 109, 4384–4388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Costales, A.; Kandalam, A.K.; Pandey, R. Theoretical study of neutral and anionic group III nitride clusters: M
_{n}N_{n}(M = Al, Ga, and In.; n = 4–6). J. Phys. Chem. B.**2003**, 107, 4508–4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Costales, A.; Pandey, R. Density functional calculations of small anionic clusters of group III nitrides. J. Phys. Chem. A
**2003**, 107, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Song, B.; Cao, P.L. Theoretical study of structures of Ga
_{3}N_{3}cluster. Phys. Lett. A**2002**, 300, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Song, B.; Cao, P.L. Theoretical study of structures of Ga
_{5}N_{5}cluster. Phys. Lett. A**2002**, 306, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Song, B.; Cao, P.L.; Li, B.X. Theoretical study of the structure of a Ga
_{6}N_{6}cluster. Phys. Lett. A**2003**, 315, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Neal, C.M.; Starace, A.K.; Jarrold, M.F. Melting of alloy clusters: Effects of aluminum doping on gallium cluster melting. J. Phys. Chem. A
**2007**, 111, 8056–8061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Guo, L. Computational investigation of Ga
_{n}Al (n = 1–15) clusters by the density-functional theory. Comp. Mater. Sci.**2009**, 45, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Deshpande, M.; Kanhere, D.G.; Pandey, R. Structural and electronic properties of neutral and ionic Ga
_{n}O_{n}clusters with n = 4–7. J. Phys. Chem. A**2006**, 37, 3814–3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Li, E.L.; Luo, X.M.; Shi, W.; Wang, X.W. Study of geometric structure, electronic state and stability of Ga
_{n}P_{m}clusters. J. Mol. Struct.**2005**, 723, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhu, X.L. Electronic states of Ga
_{3}Si, GaSi_{3}, and their ions. Spectrochim. Acta A**2005**, 62, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Gao, Y.F.; Gao, T. Laser cooling of BH and GaF: Insights from an ab initio study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
**2015**, 17, 10830–10837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Song, B.; Yao, C.H.; Cao, P.L. Density-functional study of structural and electronic properties of Ga
_{n}N (n = 1–19) clusters. Phys. Rev. B**2006**, 74, 035306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Reber, A.C.; Gamboa, G.U.; Khanna, S.N. The oblate structure and unexpected resistance in reactivity of Ag
_{15}^{+}with O_{2}. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.**2013**, 438, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.; Lv, J.; Zhu, L.; Ma, Y. CALYPSO: A method for crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun.
**2012**, 183, 2063–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.C.; Lv, J.; Zhu, L.; Ma, Y.M. Crystal structure prediction via particle-swarm optimization. Phys. Rev. B
**2010**, 82, 094116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.; Miao, M.; Lv, J.; Zhu, L.; Yin, K.; Liu, H.; Ma, Y. An effective structure prediction method for layered materials based on 2D particle swarm optimization algorithm. J. Chem. Phys.
**2012**, 137, 224108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Xing, X.; Hermann, A.; Kuang, X.; Ju, M.; Lu, C.; Jin, Y.; Xia, X.; Maroulis, G. Insights into the geometries, electronic and magnetic properties of neutral and charged palladium clusters. Sci. Rep.
**2016**, 6, 19656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Li, C.G.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, Y.Q.; Tang, Y.N.; Ren, B.Z. Geometries, stabilities and electronic properties of copper and selenium doped copper clusters: Density functional theory study. Phys. E
**2017**, 86, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, C.G.; Shen, Z.G.; Hu, Y.F.; Tang, Y.N.; Chen, W.G.; Ren, B.Z. Insights into the structures and electronic properties of Cu
_{n+1}^{u}and Cu_{n}S^{u}(n = 1–12; u = 0, ±1) clusters. Sci. Rep.**2017**, 7, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.1; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Henry, D.J. Structures and stability of doped gallium nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. C
**2012**, 116, 24814–24823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Froben, F.W.; Schulze, W.; Kloss, U. Raman spectra of matrix-isolated group IIIA dimmers: Ga
_{2}, In_{2}, Tl_{2}. Chem. Phys. Lett.**1983**, 99, 500–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, A.P.; Wen, J.Q.; Guo, P. First principles study on geometries and stabilities of small GaSi
_{n}(n = 1–6) clusters. J. At. Mol. Phys.**2017**, 34, 61–70. [Google Scholar] - Drebov, N.; Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Structures and properties of neutral gallium clusters: A theoretical investigation. J. Chem. Phys.
**2011**, 135, 044314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Li, E.L.; Chen, G.C.; Wang, X.W.; Ma, D.M.; Ma, H.; Ying, X. Ab initio investigation of structures and stability of Ga
_{n}N_{m}Clusters. J. At. Mol. Phys.**2007**, 24, 477–485. [Google Scholar] - Pearson, R.G. Chemical Hardness; Applications from Molecules to Solids; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Parr, R.G.; Yang, W. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford Press: Oxford, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, T.; Chen, F.W. Multiwfn: A Multifunctional Wavefunction Analyzer. J. Comput. Chem.
**2012**, 33, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Zhou, G.D.; Duan, L.Y. Structural Chemistry Basis; Peking University Press: Beijing, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Optimized geometries of the lowest energy Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, Ga) clusters.

**Figure 3.**The molecular orbitals for the lowest energy structure of Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) clusters.

**Figure 4.**Calculated total densities of states (TDOS) and partial densities of states (PDOS) of Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) clusters.

**Table 1.**State, symmetry, vertical ionization potential (VIP) (eV), vertical electron affinity (VEA) (eV), η (eV), E

_{gaps}(eV), and harmonic vibrational frequencies (cm

^{−1}) of Ga

_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl and Ga) clusters.

Isomer | State | Sym | VIP | VEA | η | E_{gaps} | Frequencies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Lowest Frequency | Intensity Vibration | |||||||

Ga_{5}B | ^{1}A_{1} | C_{2v} | 6.76 | 1.16 | 5.60 | 2.879 | 36(a_{2}) | 543(a_{1}) |

Ga_{5}C | ^{2}A″ | C_{s} | 6.67 | 1.95 | 4.72 | 1.934 | 15(a″) | 547(a′) |

Ga_{5}N | ^{1}A_{1} | C_{2v} | 6.44 | 1.56 | 4.88 | 2.241 | 27(b_{1}) | 631(a_{1}) |

Ga_{5}O | ^{2}A′ | C_{s} | 6.38 | 1.79 | 4.59 | 1.812 | 46(a′) | 449(a′) |

Ga_{5}F | ^{1}A′ | C_{s} | 6.64 | 1.49 | 5.15 | 2.360 | 60(a′) | 424(a′) |

Ga_{5}Al | ^{3}A″ | C_{s} | 6.70 | 2.13 | 4.57 | 1.874 | 28(a″) | 170(a′) |

Ga_{5}Si | ^{2}A′ | C_{s} | 6.79 | 2.16 | 4.63 | 1.836 | 18(a″) | 207(a″) |

Ga_{5}P | ^{1}A′ | C_{s} | 6.88 | 1.68 | 5.2 | 2.387 | 45(a″) | 336(a′) |

Ga_{5}S | ^{2}A′ | C_{s} | 6.65 | 2.05 | 4.6 | 1.837 | 30(a″) | 289(a′) |

Ga_{5}Cl | ^{1}A′ | C_{s} | 6.74 | 1.45 | 5.29 | 2.536 | 44(a′) | 274(a′) |

Ga_{6} | ^{3}A_{1}′ | D_{3h} | 6.70 | 2.12 | 4.58 | 1.889 | 29(a_{1}′) | 115(e′) |

Methods | B | C | N | O | F | Al | Si | P | S | Cl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Hirshfeld | −0.399 | −0.436 | −0.405 | −0.366 | −0.274 | 0.001 | −0.175 | −0.224 | −0.248 | −0.177 |

Mulliken | −0.861 | −1.350 | −1.150 | −0.822 | −0.471 | 0.254 | 0.023 | −0.061 | −0.156 | −0.262 |

NPA | −2.865 | −1.395 | −2.179 | −0.789 | −0.755 | 0.189 | −0.332 | −0.921 | −0.503 | −0.485 |

Bader | −1.282 | −1.816 | −1.673 | −1.343 | −0.773 | 0.350 | −0.371 | −0.857 | −0.974 | −0.591 |

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Hu, Y.; Ji, G.; Yao, Y.; Yuan, J.; Xu, W.
Geometrical Structures and Electronic Properties of Ga_{6} and Ga_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) Clusters. *Materials* **2018**, *11*, 552.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040552

**AMA Style**

Hu Y, Ji G, Yao Y, Yuan J, Xu W.
Geometrical Structures and Electronic Properties of Ga_{6} and Ga_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) Clusters. *Materials*. 2018; 11(4):552.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040552

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Hu, Yanfei, Guangfu Ji, Yachuan Yao, Jiaonan Yuan, and Weisen Xu.
2018. "Geometrical Structures and Electronic Properties of Ga_{6} and Ga_{5}X (X = B, C, N, O, F, Al, Si, P, S, Cl) Clusters" *Materials* 11, no. 4: 552.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040552