Next Article in Journal
Corrosion Behavior of the As-Cast and As-Solid Solution Mg-Al-Ge Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Excellent Infrared Nonlinear Optical Crystals BaMO(IO3)5 (M = V, Ta) Predicted by First Principle Calculations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pd-Free Activation Pretreatment for Electroless Ni-P Plating on NiFe2O4 Particles

School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(10), 1810; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101810
Submission received: 27 August 2018 / Revised: 19 September 2018 / Accepted: 19 September 2018 / Published: 24 September 2018

Abstract

:
A Pd-free activation pretreatment process was developed for electroless Ni-P plating on NiFe2O4 particles. The main influencing factors, including NiCl2·6H2O concentration, pH of electroless bath and temperature, were investigated. Microstructures of the coating layers were characterized by scanning electron microscopy. It was found that a more uniform and compact Ni-P coating layer was successfully formed by electroless plating via Pd-free activation pretreatment than Pd as sited plating. The coating layers plated by Pd-free activation pretreatment were thicker than those by the sensitization and activation pretreatment on average (9 vs. 5 μm). The new process did not need conventional sensitization or activation pretreatments, because the Ni particles dispersed uniformly on the NiFe2O4 substrate became catalytic activation sites for nickel electroless plating. Such improvement was beneficial to shortening the preparation process and reducing the production costs with the use of noble metal Pd.

1. Introduction

NiFe2O4 ceramic is a very promising inert anode for aluminum electrolysis owing to its high thermal stability, chemical stability, and high corrosion resistance against molten cryolite [1,2,3,4,5]. However, the low electroconductivity of NiFe2O4 does not meet the basic requirement [6,7], but can be improved effectively by adding conductive metal [8,9,10]. Metal Ni is the common metallic phase added to inert anode, under the nitrogen protection, Ni after sintering can still be well kept in the matrix [11,12]. Ball mixing and electroless plating are the main methods to add the metallic phase for cermet preparation [13,14,15]. Mechanical mixing, which is operationally simple and short, is mostly adopted to mix metallic and ceramic components to prepare cermet. However, the metallic phase hardly distributes uniformly and easily agglomerates, where the properties are debased dramatically [16,17,18]. A network structure of metallic phase is formed by metal coating on the surface of ceramic particles, where the properties especially conductivity are improved significantly [19,20,21].
In conventional pretreatment of electroless Ni plating, Sn and Pd are usually deposited on the substrate surface by sensitization and activation treatments [22,23,24]. However, these treatments are limited by many problems, such as the use of highly toxic tin, high cost of noble metal, and uncontrollability which results in the waste of Pd and the failure of plating [25,26]. Therefore, finding a new pretreatment without sensitization and activation becomes a research hotspot to improve the electroless plating process. Tang et al. prepared an ABS–CTS–Ni structure in which the Ni nanoparticles became catalytic sites for electroless Ni plating [27]. As reported, the ABS surfaces became rough after etching by H2SO4-MnO2 colloid and were found with newly formed carboxyl and hydroxyl groups after absorption and reduction in a sodium borohydride solution, the ABS surfaces were deposited with copper particles, which replaced the catalyst for SnCl2/PdCl2 colloid [28]. Moreover, the surface of engineering plastic was treated with an activation solution and supersonic wave to produce surface defects as the active site for the direct electroless copper plating [26]. Li et al. provided a new way to obtain porous MgO film on the surface of AZ91D magnesium alloy by the micro-arc oxidation technology [29]. An electroless plated Ni layer can be prepared on the surface of porous MgO film to improve the surface activity of porous structure. Tian et al. developed a Ni-activation method for electroless Ni deposition on inert copper substrates through negatively shifting copper potential in the presence of high-concentration thiourea in acidic solution [30]. Nobari et al. prepared a seed layer of copper nanoparticles for activating the glass substrate, and found the basic reaction involved copper ion reduction by adding hydrazine hydrate as a reducing agent to the CuSO4·5H2O and NH4OH solution [31]. The above studies suggest catalytic activation sites on the surface matrix for electroless Ni plating without sensitization-activation pretreatment can be prepared. During research on Pd-free treatment, the types of substrates include organics, metals, alloys, and glass, but there is rare report about Pd-free treatment with ceramic substrates.
In this study, a Pd-free activation pretreatment for electroless Ni-P plating was studied. NiFe2O4 substrates with numerous uniformly dispersed Ni particles, which acted as catalytic activation sites, were prepared by powder metallurgy. Then the NiFe2O4 substrates were electroless plated with continuous Ni-P coatings. Because of low-cost and environmental friendlies, this novel pretreatment was of great significance and could be applied to large-scale commercial manufacturing. The effects of deposition conditions on the weight gain rate and morphological properties of the Ni-P coatings were also studied.

2. Experimental Procedures

Nickel monoxide (NiO ≥ 99.0%), iron oxide (Fe2O3 ≥ 99.0%), nickel powder (Ni ≥ 99.5%), nickel dichloride hexahydrate (NiCl2·6H2O ≥ 98.0%), stannous chloride dihydrate (SnCl2·2H2O ≥ 98.0%), palladium chloride (PdCl2 ≥ 99.8%), sodium hypophosphite (NaH2PO2·H2O ≥ 99.0%), trisodium citrate (C6H5Na3O7·2H2O ≥ 99.0%), sodium acetate (CH3COONa ≥ 99.0%), lactic acid (C3H6O3, 85~90%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 36~38%) and ammonium hydroxide (NH3·H2O, 25~28%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Chemicals that were used in this study were analytical grade and were used as received without further purification. Double distilled and deionized water was used as a solvent.

2.1. Sensitization and Activation Pretreatments

NiFe2O4 particles were prepared from powder metallurgy. Firstly, NiO and Fe2O3 powders were mixed, milled in distilled water by ball-milling for 24 h, and then dried thoroughly. The dried mixture was molded by cold pressing under 60 MPa pressure and then air-calcined at 1200 °C in air for 6 h to from NiFe2O4 spinel matrix. After crushing and screening, NiFe2O4 particles were obtained by washing away the NiFe2O4 fine powder attached on the particle surfaces with deionized water.
The as-prepared NiFe2O4 particles were first sensitized at 60 °C in an aqueous solution containing 10 g/L SnCl2 and 10 vol.% HCl, placed until the solution became clear, and then activated in an aqueous solution of 0.5 g/L PdCl2 and 10 vol.% HCl for 10 min.

2.2. Pd-free Activation Pretreatment

Pd-free activation was performed by directly inlaying Ni particles on the substrate as catalyst sites for electroless Ni-P plating. Ni/NiFe2O4 cermets were fabricated by cold pressing and sintering proper amounts of Ni (4 wt.%), NiO and Fe2O3. Through ball-milling and drying, green bodies were molded by cold pressing under 60 MPa pressure and calcined at 1200 °C for 6 h in a nitrogen atmosphere. After crushing and screening, the fine powder on the particle surfaces was washed away with deionized water. Ni-NiFe2O4 particles were selected for electroless plating.

2.3. Electroless Plating

Electroless plating was carried out in air without the protection of nitrogen or inert gas, under simultaneous stirring by a mechanical agitator. The reaction solution was made up of NaH2PO2·H2O, Ni2Cl2·6H2O, Na3C6H5O7·2H2O and CH3COONa. During the reaction, the system was kept at constant pH by adding an NH3·H2O solution. The load was 30 g/L. Finally, after washing several times with distilled water to remove all impurities, the plated particles were collected by vacuum filtration and then vacuum-dried at 100 °C for 2 h. The substrate particles treated by the two activation methods were electrolessly plated separately under the same plating parameters, summarized in Table 1.

2.4. Characterization

Particle sizes and specific surface areas of electroless plating substrate particles were measured using a Bettersize 2000 laser particle size analyzer (Bettersize, Dandong, Liaoning, China). The sizes of particles in the 10% (D10, small particles), 50% (D50, median particle size) and 90% (D90, large particles) of particle size distribution were measured. All results were the average of 5 groups of measurements. The errors of repeatability and accuracy were both ≤0.5%. The microstructures and surface compositions of the sensitized and activated NiFe2O4 particles, and the Pd-free treated Ni-NiFe2O4 particles were observed by Ultra Plus field emission scanning electron microscopy (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) and energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). Surface roughness (Sa) of the coatings was measured using a LEXT OLS4100 3D measuring laser microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Surface morphology and thickness of electroless Ni-P coatings on NiFe2O4 and Ni/NiFe2O4 particles were investigated by FESEM and the coating compositions were analyzed by EDS. The weight gain rate R of the Ni-P layer after the electroless plating reaction was determined via a weight gain method:
R = m 2 m 1 m 1 × 100 %
where m2 is the mass of the object plated after a time duration of t, and m1 is the initial mass of the substrate. All electroless plating reactions took 70 min. Thus, R reflected the deposition efficiency of the electroless plating reaction on substrate surfaces in the plating bath. R was the average value of 5 measurements since reach electroless plating reaction under each type of conditions was conducted 5 times.

3. Results and Discussion

The sizes and specific surface areas of the substrate particles in the electroless plating experiments are shown in Table 2.
As shown in Table 2, the two types of substrate particles were not largely different in median sizes (D50), small-particle distribution (D10), large-particle distribution (D90) or specific surface area, indicating for substrates treated by different activation methods, the loading amounts in the plating solutions were similar when the weight conditions were the same.

3.1. Pd Activation and Pd-Free Activation Pretreatment

The electroless Ni reaction is autocatalytic, which means the reaction continues once an initial Ni layer is created. This reaction is so promising that Ni can act successfully as catalyst sites for Ni deposition. In this work, the activation process was performed by directly inlaying Ni particles on the substrate as catalyst sites for electroless Ni-P plating. Since the result of activation would affect the electroless plating, the amounts and distributions of active metals (Pd and Ni) on particle surfaces after different pretreatments were compared, showing in Figure 1.
After sensitization and activation pretreatment (Figure 1a), the Pd was confirmed on top the surface of NiFe2O4 particle according to the EDS results (Figure 1c) and appeared on the surface of original ceramic grains. However, Pd atoms accumulated at the ‘nm’ scale, but were rarely adsorbed onto particle surfaces (Figure 1a). The peaks of Pd indicated the less quantity of Pd particles. The Pd concentration at the enrichment site was determined by EDS spectra to be 5.55 wt.%.
Figure 1b shows the SEM image of Ni-NiFe2O4particles produced with the described pretreatment method. The enrichment zone of Ni particles was at the micrometer scale. Together with the EDS results (Figure 1d), it is obvious that massive fine Ni particles were uniformly dispersed on the NiFe2O4 substrate and acted as catalytic activation sites and could be sufficient to start the electroless Ni-P plating. The Ni concentration at the enrichment zone was determined by EDS spectra to be 89.38 wt.%.

3.2. Electroless Ni-P Plating

To compare these two pretreatments, NiFe2O4 particles undergoing the two methods were electrolessly plated under the same conditions. Figure 2 shows the 3D measuring laser microscope images. At the same plating layer area of 130 × 130 μm2, we found the height difference in Figure 2c was larger than that in Figure 2d (54.57 μm vs. 36.77 μm), as the plating layer of the sensitized particles was slope-shaped, while that of the Pd-free treated particles much gentler. The roughness (Sa) of the plating layer of the sensitized particles was larger than that of the Pd-free treated particles (4.21 μm vs. 3.18 μm).
The differences between Figure 2a,b are mainly attributed to the numbers of Pd and Ni particles per unit area of the substrate. Compared with the Pd active species derived from the sensitization-activation pretreatment (Figure 1a), more Ni active species are uniformly dispersed on Ni-NiFe2O4 particles (Figure 1b). The reason may be that less Sn2+ was left on the surface of NiFe2O4 particle, leading to little Pd adsorption on the particle surface activation, while the existence of Pd was necessary for Ni deposition. The grains grew along the three-dimensional directions in the electroless plating [32], and the mechanism underlying the effect of active point distribution on the plating morphology is shown in Figure 3. When the active species were sparse, the grains were prone to crystallization into Volmer-Weber growth (Figure 3a), and other wise, smooth surfaces were formed (Figure 3b).
Under the same process conditions, the coating layers of NiFe2O4 particles after electroless plating via Pd-free activation pretreatment are lightly thicker than these via sensitization-activation pretreatment (about 9 μm vs. 5 μm; Figure 4a,b). These results also confirm the new Pd-free pretreatment method could endow the matrix particles with stronger auto catalytic ability. Moreover, the particle substrate in Figure 4a contains numerous holes in the zone M, while that in the zone N in Figure 4b has fewer holes. This was because the addition of Ni powder promoted the sintering and made the ceramic phase denser. The addictive Ni of the Y zone in Figure 4b could enhance the matrix density, while the metals in the zone X in Figure 4a are deposited on the surface holes of the metals during the electroless plating, thereby reducing the thickness of metal plating layer in Figure 4a.

3.3. Influences of Main Factors on Pd-Free Electroless Plating

To further explore the main influence factors of electroless Ni-P plating bath on R and microstructure of coating, a series of experiments were performed by single factor experiment. The electroless Ni-P plating mechanism was considered to interpret the effects of main factors on R. In general, the electroless Ni-P plating underwent the following reactions [33]:
H 2 PO 2 + H 2 O HPO 3 2 + 2 H ad + H +
Ni 2 + + 2 H ad Ni + 2 H +
H 2 PO 2 + H ad H 2 O + 2 OH + P
2 H ad H 2
Firstly, when pH was changed with in 7.5~9.5, R increased, but when the pH exceeded 9.0, the plating solution became less stable and black sediments were formed at the bottom of the bath (Figure 5). These phenomena are probably attributed to the byproduct of electroless plating. According to reaction (2), phosphate anion is generated by the oxidation of hypophosphite. As the reaction proceeds, phosphate steadily accumulates in the plating bath. When the concentration increases to some extent, phosphate begins to complex with Ni2+.
Therefore, the experimental results suggest an optimum pH of 9.0.
Then the effect of bath temperature on R was investigated (Figure 6). With the rise of bath temperature, R increased first, maximized at 70 °C and then decreased. Electroless Ni-P plating is an endothermic reaction that needs to absorb energy from the surrounding. Indeed, all practical baths should operate at ≥60 °C. Though temperature rise contributed to improving R, too high temperature would lead to too fast deposition, which loosened the plating layers and caused the fall-off of the plating layers due to the stirring of the plating liquids. As a result, the concentration of free Ni in the plating liquids increased, which reduced the quality of the plating layers. In this case, the optimal temperature is 70 °C.
Moreover, the plating layer formed at 80 °C was dark grey, and the particles became darker with the increase of bath temperature. Thus, the color changes indicate a different deposition process of Ni-P. To clarify the underlying reasons, the microstructures of the products formed at 70 °C and 80 °C were further analyzed.
Figure 7 shows the SEM images of the Ni-P-coated NiFe2O4 particles at 70 °C (Figure 7a) and 80 °C (Figure 7b). The coating formed at 70 °C was constituted with agglomerated nodules and was smooth and uniform (Figure 7a). In the coating formed at 80 °C, however, a lot of microspheres deposited and already agglomerated on the nodules of the deposited layer (Figure 7b). EDS hierarchical scan image in Figure 7c obtained from P in 7b shows P is enriched in the of microsphere gathering zone of Figure 7b.
The compositions of the nodules and the microsphere formed on NiFe2O4 particle surface were investigated via EDS (Figure 7d–f). As electroless plating proceeded at 70 °C, the X site on the EDS image only contained Ni (89.83 wt.%) and P (10.17 wt.%), as the surface was fully covered by deposited Ni-P coating (Figure 7d). As electroless plating proceeded at 80 °C, the signals at points Y and Z of Fe and O were weakened (Figure 7e,f), indicating the coating formed on the surface of NiFe2O4 particles was thin. At point Z compared with point X which were both nodules, the content of P element was far less (0.7% vs. 10.17%) and the content of Ni element was far more (96.72% vs. 89.83%). However, at point Y which was in the microsphere, the content of P element was the highest (13.24%) and the content of Ni element was the least (85.04%). This observation is in good agreement with Figure 7c that P is enriched in the microspheres.
Finally, the influence of Ni2+ concentration on R was investigated. Clearly, R rose linearly with the increase of Ni2+ concentration in the range from 16 to 32 g/L (Figure 8), which was because Ni2+ was reduced by H2PO2− according to reactions (2) and (3). However, R slightly rose as Ni2+ concentration increased beyond the level of 40 g/L. This was probably because the complex formation between complexing agents and nickel ions maintained the dissociated nickel ion concentration appreciably constant at a higher Ni2+ concentration in the electroless Ni-P plating bath. Thus, the increase of Ni2+ concentration at a constant complexing agent concentration did not immediately increase the amount of free Ni2+ in the bath. Further increase in Ni2+ concentration at a high range (≥40 g/L), led to obvious decrease of R. From the economic perspective, higher Ni2+ concentration of the electroless Ni-P plating bath is not recommended. Hence, these results verify the optimized concentration of NiCl2·6H2O is around 32 g/L.
Based on the above results and discussion, a mechanism of the proposed electroless Ni-P plating at 80 °C is as follows: reaction (3) is dominant at the beginning of the electroless Ni-P plating, in which a mass of Ni particles and a few P particles are deposited to form nodules. Then reaction (4) becomes dominant, in which a mass of P particles and a few Ni particles are deposited to form microspheres.

4. Conclusions

A novel Pd-free activation pretreatment for Ni electroless plating on NiFe2O4 was achieved by fixing Ni particles as catalysts on the NiFe2O4 substrate. With this pretreatment method, a glossy and smooth Ni-P plating layer was formed from an electroless Ni-P plating bath. This environmentally friendly activation process is contributed to reducing both capital and operational costs in large-scale manufacturing. Experiments about the influences of main factors in the electroless Ni-P plating bath on R and microstructure of coatings show the optimal NiCl2·6H2O content, pH and temperature are 32 g/L, 9.0 and 70 °C, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and Writing, J.M. and Z.Z.; Investigation and Formal Analysis, X.Z. and Y.L.; Funding Acquisition, H.L. and G.Y.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N180203004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874093).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sadowy, D.R. Inert anodes for the Hall-Héroult cell: The ultimate materials challenge. JOM 2001, 53, 34–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Glucina, M.; Hyland, M. Laboratory-scale performance of a binary Cu-Al alloy as an anode for aluminiumelectrowinning. Corros. Sci. 2006, 48, 2457–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shi, Z.N.; Xu, J.L.; Qiu, Z.X.; Wang, Z.W. Copper-nickel superalloys as inert alloy anodes for aluminum electrolysis. JOM 2003, 55, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Constantin, V. Influence of the operating parameters over the current efficiency and corrosion rate in the Hall-Heroult aluminum cell with tin oxide anode substrate material. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 23, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, G.H.; Sun, X.F. Electrochemical behavior of cermet anodes in Na3AlF6–K3AlF6-based low-melting electrolytes for aluminium electrolysis. In Light Metals 2013; Sadler, B., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1295–1298. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, W.X.; Zhang, G.; Li, J.; Lai, Y.Q. NiFe2O4-based cermet inert anodes for aluminum electrolysis. JOM 2009, 61, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pawlek, R.P. Inert anodes: An update. In Light Metals 2014; Grandfield, J., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1309–1313. [Google Scholar]
  8. Olsen, E.; Thonstad, J. Nickel ferrite as inert anodes in aluminium electrolysis Part II material performance and long-time testing. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1999, 29, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xi, J.H.; Xie, Y.J.; Yao, G.C.; Liu, Y.H. Effect of additive on corrosion resistance of NiFe2O4 ceramics as inert anodes. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2008, 18, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, H.B.; Wang, Y. Corrosion of NiFe2O4–10NiO-based cermet inert anodes for aluminium electrolysis. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2013, 23, 3816–3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, Z.L.; Lai, Y.Q.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.X. Effect of Ni content on corrosion behavior of Ni/(10NiO-90NiFe2O4) cermet inert anode. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2008, 18, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lai, Y.Q.; Tian, Z.L.; Li, J.; Ye, S.L.; Liu, Y.X. Preliminary testing of NiFe2O4-NiO-Ni cermet as inert anode in Na3AlF6-AlF3 melts. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2006, 16, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Song, J.L.; Chen, W.G.; Dong, L.L.; Wang, J.J.; Deng, N. An electroless plating and planetary ball milling process for mechanical properties enhancement of bulk CNTs/Cu composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 720, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, G.J.; Huang, X.X.; Guo, J.K.; Chen, D.M. Ni-coated Al2O3 powders. Ceram. Int. 2002, 28, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, W.B.; Zhang, B.L.; Zhuang, H.R.; Li, W.L. Preparation and sintering of Ni-coated Si3N4 composite powders. Ceram. Int. 2005, 31, 811–815. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, H.; Jia, J.F.; Song, H.Z.; Hu, X.; Sun, H.W.; Yang, D.L. The preparation of Cu-coated Al2O3 composite powders by electroless plating. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 2181–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, R.; Gao, L.; Guo, J.K. Preparation and characterization of coated nanoscale Cu-SiCp composite particles. Ceram. Int. 2004, 30, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vincenzino, V.; Mojtaba, G. Modelling of auto-agglomeration of cohesive powders. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 133, 137–141. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, S.; Xiong, D.G.; Liu, M.; Bai, S.X.; Zhao, X. Thermophysical properties of SiC/Al composites with three dimensional interpenetrating network structure. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 7539–7544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lai, Y.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Z.L.; Sun, X.G.; Zhang, G.; Li, J. Effect of adding methods of metallic phase on microstructure and thermal shock resistance of Ni/(90NiFe2O4-10NiO) cermets. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2007, 17, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, C.W. Friction Stir Processing of Copper-Coated SiC Particulate-Reinforced Aluminum Matrix Composite. Materials 2018, 11, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kang, Y.Q.; Cao, M.S.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, L.; Wen, B.; Fang, X.Y. Preparation and microwave absorption properties of basalt fiber/nickel core-shell hetero structures. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 495, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zou, G.Z.; Cao, M.S.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.G.; Xu, H.; Chen, Y.J. A nanoscale core-shell of β-SiCp-Ni prepared by electroless plating at lower temperature. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 201, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, J.Y.; Lee, H.K. Electroless Ni-P metallization on palladium activated polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fiber by using a drying process. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 204, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luo, L.M.; Lu, Z.L.; Huang, X.M.; Tan, X.Y.; Ding, X.Y.; Cheng, J.G.; Zhu, L.; Wu, Y.C. Electroless copper plating on PC engineering plastic with a novel palladium-free surface activation process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 251, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Song, D.; Zhou, J.D.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, X.J.; Yan, Y.; Li, F.S. A novel activation for electroless plating on preparing Ni/PS microspheres. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 282–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tang, X.J.; Bi, C.L.; Han, C.X.; Zhang, B.G. A new palladium-free surface activation process for Ni electroless plating on ABS plastic. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 840–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.; Miao, Z. Environmentally Friendly Copper Metallization of ABS by Cu-Catalysed Electroless Process. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2016, 45, 1709–1713. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, J.M.; Xue, X.N.; Cai, H.; Jiang, B.L. Preparation and characterization of electroless Ni coating on the surface of MgO with porous structure. Acta Metall. Sin. 2010, 46, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tian, D.; Li, D.Y. A Pd-free activation method for electroless nickel deposition on copper. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 228, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nobaria, N.; Behboudnia, M. Palladium-free electroless deposition of pure copper film on glass substrate using hydrazine as reducing agent. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 385, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.L.; Wang, X.B.; Gao, R.; Sun, L. Study of deposition patterns of plating layers in SiC/Cu composites by electro-brush plating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 10294–10299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Malecki, A.; Micek-Ilnicka, A. Electroless nickel plating from acid bath. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2002, 123, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) Pd activated NiFe2O4 particles, (b) Ni-NiFe2O4 particles, and EDS results of (c) at point A, (d) at point B.
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) Pd activated NiFe2O4 particles, (b) Ni-NiFe2O4 particles, and EDS results of (c) at point A, (d) at point B.
Materials 11 01810 g001
Figure 2. 3D measuring laser microscope images of the surfaces of coatings prepared by these two pretreatments: (a) 3D brightness image and (c) 3D height image of sensitization-activation pretreatment; (b) 3D brightness image and (d) 3D height image of Pd-free activation pretreatment.
Figure 2. 3D measuring laser microscope images of the surfaces of coatings prepared by these two pretreatments: (a) 3D brightness image and (c) 3D height image of sensitization-activation pretreatment; (b) 3D brightness image and (d) 3D height image of Pd-free activation pretreatment.
Materials 11 01810 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of electroless plating process by (a) sensitization-activation pretreatment and (b) Pd-free activation pretreatment.
Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of electroless plating process by (a) sensitization-activation pretreatment and (b) Pd-free activation pretreatment.
Materials 11 01810 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of Ni-P coatings on NiFe2O4 electroless plated (a) with sensitization-activation and (b) Pd-free pretreatment.
Figure 4. SEM images of Ni-P coatings on NiFe2O4 electroless plated (a) with sensitization-activation and (b) Pd-free pretreatment.
Materials 11 01810 g004
Figure 5. Effect of pH value on the weight gain rate.
Figure 5. Effect of pH value on the weight gain rate.
Materials 11 01810 g005
Figure 6. Effect of temperature on the weight gain rate.
Figure 6. Effect of temperature on the weight gain rate.
Materials 11 01810 g006
Figure 7. The SEM morphologies of the coating at (a) 70 °C and (b) 80 °C, EDS results of the coating, on X (d) and Y (e), Z (f), and mapping of elements of P in (c).
Figure 7. The SEM morphologies of the coating at (a) 70 °C and (b) 80 °C, EDS results of the coating, on X (d) and Y (e), Z (f), and mapping of elements of P in (c).
Materials 11 01810 g007
Figure 8. Effect of NiCl2·6H2O concentration on the weight gain rate.
Figure 8. Effect of NiCl2·6H2O concentration on the weight gain rate.
Materials 11 01810 g008
Table 1. Technological conditions of electroless plating.
Table 1. Technological conditions of electroless plating.
Electroless Plating Bath
ReagentsNiCl2·6H2ONaH2PO2·H2OC6H5Na3O7·2H2OC3H6O3CH3COONa
Concentration16–48 g/L28 g/L25 g/L20 mL/L15 g/L
Process time70 min
Temperature60–80 °C
pH7.5–9.5
Stirring speed250 rpm
Table 2. Size characteristics of NiFe2O4 and Ni-NiFe2O4 particles.
Table 2. Size characteristics of NiFe2O4 and Ni-NiFe2O4 particles.
CharacteristicsNiFe2O4Ni-NiFe2O4
D10152 μm153 μm
D50236 μm234 μm
D90350 μm346 μm
Specific surface area0.008 m2/g0.008 m2/g

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Luo, H.; Yao, G. Pd-Free Activation Pretreatment for Electroless Ni-P Plating on NiFe2O4 Particles. Materials 2018, 11, 1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101810

AMA Style

Ma J, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Zhang X, Luo H, Yao G. Pd-Free Activation Pretreatment for Electroless Ni-P Plating on NiFe2O4 Particles. Materials. 2018; 11(10):1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101810

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Junfei, Zhigang Zhang, Yihan Liu, Xiao Zhang, Hongjie Luo, and Guangchun Yao. 2018. "Pd-Free Activation Pretreatment for Electroless Ni-P Plating on NiFe2O4 Particles" Materials 11, no. 10: 1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101810

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop