Next Article in Journal
Microarc Oxidation Coating Combined with Surface Pore-Sealing Treatment Enhances Corrosion Fatigue Performance of 7075-T7351 Al Alloy in Different Media
Previous Article in Journal
Co3O4@CoS Core-Shell Nanosheets on Carbon Cloth for High Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/ma10060610
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Preparation of Porous Sol-Gel Silica with Metal Organic Framework MIL-101(Cr) by Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Method for Adsorption Chillers

by
Kasimayan Uma
1,*,
Guan-Ting Pan
2 and
Thomas C-K. Yang
1,2,*
1
Centre for Precision Analysis and Research Center, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(6), 610; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10060610
Submission received: 29 March 2017 / Revised: 26 May 2017 / Accepted: 29 May 2017 / Published: 2 June 2017
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metal organic framework (MOF) of MIL-101(Cr)-Silica (SiO2) composites with highly mesoporous and uniform dispersions were synthesized by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method followed by the sol-gel technique. Water vapor adsorption experiments were conducted on the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites for industrial adsorption chiller applications. The effects of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 mixing ratios (ranging from 0% to 52%), the surface area and amount of Lewis and Brønsted sites were comprehensively determined through water vapor adsorption experiments and the adsorption mechanism is also explained. The BET and Langmuir results indicate that the adsorption isotherms associated with the various MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 ratios demonstrated Type I and IV adsorption behavior, due to the mesoporous structure of the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2. It was observed that the increase in the amount of Lewis and Brønsted sites on the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites significantly improves the water vapor adsorption efficiency, for greater stability during the water vapor adsorption experiments.

1. Introduction

Recently, remarkable progress has been made in the use of porous materials as functional components in a variety of gas storage/separation, sensing, catalysis and proton conduction applications [1]. MOF materials are interesting for industrial applications due to their high surface area, special crystalline structure, tunable pore size, and other unique properties [2]. However, as reported by Li and Zeng, several important drawbacks remain with these MOFs such as low chemical stability and weak mechanical strength [3], which limit their usage in industrial applications. Nevertheless, the physical and chemical properties of the MOF composites have showed a great deal of interest for adsorption applications. MOF-based composites can be prepared by the physical or chemical integration of a basic MOF material into an inorganic or polymeric substrate [4,5]. For example W. Martin et al. [6] reported on the thermal and chemical stability of MIL-100 (Fe, Cr) and MIL-101(Cr) MOFs in water vapor adsorption studies. They found the MOFs of MIL-100(Fe, Cr) and MIL-101(Cr) to be promising candidates for the development of adsorption chillers, with the adsorption values reaching to 0.79 g/g (i.e., 43.88 mM/g). In addition, as reported by Ferey et al. [7], materials with high micro-pore volumes and large surface areas are desirable for adsorption applications because they allow faster mass diffusion and are capable of hosting large molecules. However, most microporous materials have diffusion limits, which affect the diffusion rate of the composite and the resultant chemical reactions [8]. Recently, some research groups have reported on the synthesis of MOF composite thin films on bare and modified nonporous silica and alumina surfaces by microwave-assisted and solvothermal methods [9,10]. However, it is difficult to synthesize perfect MOF composites because the uniformity of the dispersion is ruined by crystallization and agglomeration of the powder. It is important to modify the MOF with mesoporous silica so as to increase the adsorption ability and the number of specific adsorption sites, in order to solve the diffusion problem. Moreover, the coexistence of nano-sized silica and MOFs with highly dispersed microstructures around the silica matrix may be achieved during the synthesis process. The aspect ratios, MOF nanostructure, surface area and pore volume represent additional constraints that need to be considered in order to improve the integration between SiO2 and MOF in a composite material. In recent past, some of the works have been reported on the MOF-SiO2 composites to enhance the adsorption/separation behaviors of MOF [11,12,13,14].
MOF materials have been synthesized by various methods, including microwave-assisted hydrothermal [15,16], hydrothermal [17,18], electrochemical [19,20], sonochemical [21], mechanochemical [22,23,24], ionothermal [25,26,27,28], drygel conversion [29,30], and microfluidic [31] approaches. Among these fabrication techniques, microwave-assisted hydrothermal methods offer a number of advantages other than synthetic routes, particularly in the case of MOFs [10]. Also, a sol-gel approach is the most facile route for the production of highly-ordered and controlled patterns and architectures, with an improved production rate and functionality [32]. A few studies have also been devoted to exploring the mechanism of water vapor adsorption in MOF materials [1,6,33,34]. Many researchers have studied increasing the mesoporosity in MOF material, but it has been found that small changes in the molar ratios of the reactants or solvents can result in nanoporous materials with poor crystallinity.
In this study, we demonstrate a facile approach for the synthesis of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites, utilizing the microwave-assisted hydrothermal and sol-gel methods. We present a bottom-up synthesis strategy which produces a good aspect ratio of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites. The MIL-101(Cr) ratio and good dispersion in the silica matrix lead to good performance. Further, we evaluate the physical and chemical properties of the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites on the role of water-vapor adsorbents for applications in adsorption chillers.

2. Results and Discussion

In this work, we prepared pristine MIL-101(Cr) samples using a microwave-assisted, hydrothermal method, with specific reaction times (e.g., 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min). There was no change in the size of the MIL-101(Cr) crystals obtained, even after increasing the reaction time to 60 min. In order to obtain a good crystalline structure we used different ratios of chromium nitrate/terephthalic acid/hydrofluoric acid (1:1:4, 1:1:2 and 1:1:1.4) as seeds for growth of the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites. The SiO2 modified MIL-101(Cr) composites were characterized with different analytical methods to study the composition and structure of the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites.

2.1. FTIR Spectral Analysis

Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectra of the as-prepared MIL-101(Cr)-n%)-Si samples with different MIL-101(Cr) percentages. The broad absorption band, which appears at 3500 cm−1 corresponds to the OH stretching vibration derived from the strongly H-bonded COOH groups [35]. In addition, the peaks at 1605 cm−1 and 1425 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric deformation modes of the ammonia species (NH4+) absorbed on the Lewis sites and Brønsted sites, respectively [36]. The peaks observed in the range between 1300 cm−1 and 1750 cm−1 confirm the presence of dicarboxylate (νas(COO), νs(COO), and ν(C-C) vibrations) in the structure of the metal organic framework [37]. The bands at 1635, 1117 and 749 cm−1 can be attributed to the vibrations of the aromatic rings (σ(C-H) and γ(C-H)) and C=O group [38], respectively. In addition, the peaks at 800, 972 and 1092 cm−1, indicate stretching and the asymmetric vibration of the Si-O-Si [39], whereas the absorption peak at 577 cm−1 indicates Cr–O vibration in the metal organic framework [40].

2.2. Powder XRD Measurements

Figure 2A–E displays the XRD patterns of the different percentage of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites before and after the water vapor adsorption treatment. As can be seen, the MIL-101(Cr) (0.00%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (29.65%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 and MIL-101(Cr) (52.00%)-SiO2 showed diffraction peaks at 2.83°, 3.31°, 5.18°, 8.45° and 9.07°, respectively. The results indicate that the crystalline structure of the MIL-101(Cr) did not change after the water vapor adsorption treatment. Hence, the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites could be reused for another experiment without further treatment. Figure 2F shows the diffraction peaks at 2.83°, 3.31°, 4.01°, 5.18°, 5.86°, 8.45°, 9.07°, 10.33°, 11.23°, 16.53°, 16.89°, 17.27° and 19.6° confirming the formation of the metal organic framework [41]. The XRD intensity of the MIL-101(Cr) 8.70%-SiO2 samples was very weak compared to those samples prepared with a higher percentage of MIL-101(Cr), because of their poor crystallinity. The poor crystalline nature of these composites arose from the smaller percentage of MIL-101(Cr) and higher concentration of silica. At 12.29%, slight 2θ peaks appeared due to the initiation of crystallization. At percentages above 12.29%, the intensity increased more when compared to percentages of 8.70 and 12.29. Based on the results, we can conclude that diffraction peaks began to appear when the amount of added MIL-101(Cr) exceeded 12.26%, with high intensity observed at small angles (2θ), which indicates the presence of mesopores in the MIL-101(Cr) (29.60%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 and MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO2 structures. With a higher composition of MIL-101(Cr) i.e., 29.60%, 42.43% or 52%, the structure was sufficiently well developed to make this a potentially good adsorbent for adsorption chillers.

2.3. Microstructural and Compositional Studies

The SEM images of different ratios of chromium nitrate/terephthalic acid/hydrofluoric acid (1:1:4, 1:1:2, and 1:1:1.4) are shown in Figure 3. When the ratio of hydrofluoric acid decreased from 4 to 1.4 the shape of the MIL-101(Cr) composites changed from a needle to a square shape, and the particle sizes were gradually decreased from 10 to 1 μm. Figure 4 shows the SEM images of MIL-101(Cr) composites prepared using microwave-assisted, hydrothermal method with different time intervals. There is not much difference in the shape of MIL-101(Cr) composites for all the samples with different time intervals, and their sizes are about 300~400 nm as shown in Figure 4.
Further, the SEM was carried out to analyze the microstructure of the MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-Si composites. Figure 5 shows SEM images of (A) MIL-101(Cr) (0.00%)-SiO2, (B) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, (C) MIL-101(Cr) (29.65%)-SiO2, (D) MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 and (E) MIL-101(Cr) (52.00%)-SiO2 at 2.5K (X). The different concentrations of MIL-101(Cr) in the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites were monodispersed with particle sizes of around 1 μm. Moreover, the morphology of the MIL-101(Cr) (0.00%)-SiO2, and MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO2 differed from that of the MIL-101(Cr) (29.65%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 and MIL-101(Cr) (52.00%)-SiO2 samples. A very low concentration of MIL-101(Cr) loading did not affect the morphology of the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites, whereas at higher loadings such as MIL-101(Cr) (29.65)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2, and MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO2, there was a change in the surface morphology of the aggregated crystals, which had an irregular granular shape, as shown in Figure 5C–E. Referring to the XRD results, we can observe diffraction peaks for the MIL-101(Cr) (29.65%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 and MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO2 composites, due to the greater aggregation of MIL-101(Cr) with Si composites. The surface composition of all the samples was investigated using energy dispersive X-ray analysis. The elemental surface compositions of all the samples (a–g) are listed in Table 1. The atomic ratios of [Si]:[O]:[Cr] for these MIL-101(Cr) composite particles were in the range of 1.00:2.51–2.98:0.00–0.19. The homogeneity of the dispersion of the Cr, O and silica particles in the MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-Si composite was based on the percentage of MIL-101(Cr). The EDX results agree well with the XRD results, with the MIL-101(Cr) (29.65%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (42.63)-SiO2, and (MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO2 samples showing a better crystalline phase due to the higher Cr/Si ratio.

2.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

TGA is one of the best methods for quantitatively estimating the water adsorption of a MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composite [42], therefore this method was used to observe the thermal stability of the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 with various temperature ramp rates, as shown in Figure 6. A significant weight loss occurred and a stable zone formed under the nitrogen atmosphere at temperatures of 75, 80 and 95 °C as shown in Figure 6A–C, respectively. In the first stage, there is a weight loss of all samples in the interval from 0 to 15 min, which indicates the completion of dehydration within 15 min. The dehydration time decreased with increasing temperature. In addition, it can be found that the dehydration time decreased with variation of the percentage of MIL-101(Cr) from 0% to 100.00%. After 15 min, the curves of all samples tended to stabilize, due to the completion of dehydration. The TGA results demonstrate that the addition of the MIL-101(Cr) does not affect thermal stability. Abid et al. [41] reported that MIL-101(Cr) has a strong thermal stability, which agrees well with the observations of our MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 samples.

2.5. Nitrogen Adsorption Analysis

The nitrogen adsorption isotherms for the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composite materials are shown in Figure 7. Figure 7A,F shows the commercial silica gel and pristine MOF. The commercial silica gel, pure SiO2 and MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO2 are associated with type I isotherms, according to the IUPAC classification [43,44] which is characteristic of a uniform microporous structure, as shown in Figure 7C. In addition, the hydroxyl functional groups present in the MIL-101(Cr)-Si that lead to an increase in the affinity between water and MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2, resulting in higher N2 uptake values, increased with increasing MIL-101(Cr) percentages. Although the existence of these functional groups does affect the isotherm values, this effect appears to be marginal at enhancing the affinity of the adsorbent surface to the water molecule [45]. However, the MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (29.60)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 and MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO2 composite samples showed the type IV isotherms that correspond to a mesoporous material. The N2 type IV adsorption isotherm of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 indicates an increase in the N2 uptake values. The results confirm that MIL-10(Cr)-SiO2 can be considered an integrated material with excellent adsorption behavior, arising from the high percentage of MIL-101(Cr) and the mesoporous structure. The nitrogen adsorption isotherm types I and IV results agree well with past reported results [46,47]. The BET and Langmuir surface areas of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites with different percentages of MIL-101(Cr) are listed in Table 2. It can be seen that there is an increase in the BET surface area and Langmuir surface area of all the samples with higher percentages of MIL-101(Cr). Moreover, the MIL-101(Cr) (0%)-SiO2 sample showed a low surface area (161.56 m2/g) due to the mesoporous SiO2 with its occluded surfactant. The MIL-101(Cr) (52%) composite had a higher surface area i.e., 381.41 m2/g. Qiu et al. and Yan et al. [48,49] reported that MOF had a diluting effect when combined with SiO2 which could lead to the formation of mesoporous wormhole structures in the prepared MIL-101(Cr) composites. Our results show that a high adsorption capacity material could be prepared by using a higher percentage of MIL-101(Cr) in the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composite, without losing the nature of the mesoporous structure.

2.6. Water Vapor Adsorption Behaviors of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 Composites

The water adsorption isotherms of the MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites are shown in Figure 8. Recent water vapor adsorption results provide significant information for surface characterization of the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of MOFs [46,49]. Kim et al. [50] and Pan et al. [36] reported that Lewis sites and Brønsted sites play a dominant role in the water vapor adsorption capacity, being beneficial to the adsorption kinetics on the material surface. In Figure 8, it can be seen that the water vapor absorbance increases being 0.34 (18.88 mM/g), 0.44 (24.44 mM/g), 0.78 (43.33 mM/g), 0.96 (53.3 mM/g), 0.99 (55.0 mM/g), 1.03 (57.22 mM/g), and 1.40 g/g (77.77 mM/g) for the MIL-101(Cr) (0%)-SiO2 , MIL-101(Cr) (8.7%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (29.60%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2, MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO2 and pure MIL-101(Cr), respectively. The greater number of micropores in the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites to be filled with water, and the pore size of the MIL-101(Cr) structure, play primary roles in increasing the water vapor adsorption capacity. In addition, the Lewis and Brønsted sites gave the strongest intensity in the hydroxyl functional groups on the surface of the materials. This result was also confirmed by the FTIR results, as the Lewis and Brønsted acid increased with a rise in the percentage of MIL-101(Cr) in the composites. Therefore, the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites showed a higher water vapor adsorption capacity and stronger thermal stability due to the high BET and Langmuir surface area, the mesoporous structure, and the Lewis and Brønsted acid sites. We can thus conclude that the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites with more than 12.29% MIL-101(Cr) would have greater water-adsorption ability whereas those with less than 12.29% MIL-101(Cr) embedded in the SiO2 matrix would have a restricted water vapor adsorption capacity.

2.7. Water Vapor Adsorption and Desorption Stability Test

The stability of the MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 composites were tested by the adsorptions/desorption (30 °C/95 °C) of water vapor up to eight cycles, as shown in Figure 9. For all the eight cycles, there is no change in the adsorption/desorption capability of the MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 composites in the presence of water vapor. The results confirm that the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites prepared using a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method is more stable and possesses the potential of practical application.

3. Material Preparation and Characterization

3.1. Chemical Reagents

Tetraethyl orthosilicate (Si (OC2H5)4, 99%), chromium (III) nitrate nonahydrate (Cr (NO3)3·9H2O, 99%), 1,4-benzene dicarboxylic acid (C12H10O4, 99%), hydrofluoric acid (HF, 48%), ammonium fluoride (NH4F, 99%), ethanol (CH3CH2OH, 99%), hydrogen chloride (HCl, 99%) were received from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.

3.2. Preparation of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 Composites

MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites with varying MIL-101(Cr) percentages were prepared using the microwave- assisted hydrothermal and sol-gel methods. Briefly the Cr (NO3)3·9H2O (15 mmol), C12H10O4 (23 mmol) and HF (8 mmol) were dissolved in distilled water (15 mL) and continuously stirred to form a homogeneous solution. In this experiment, we tried three different ratios of chromium nitrate, 1,4-benzene dicarboxylic acid and hydrofluoric acid i.e., 1:1:4, 1:1:2 and 1: 1:1.4. The adsorbents were prepared using a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method with a microwave power of 500 W at times of 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min. The ratio of 1:1:1.4 and microwave power of 500 W at 60 min were used to prepare MIL-101(Cr). For crystallization, this homogeneous solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave. The autoclave in a microwave oven was heated to 220 °C for eight h and then allowed to cool down to room temperature. After the treatment, the suspension was filtered and washed with ethanol and ultra-pure water three times, and then dispersed in 1M NH4F. After rinsing with ultra-pure water, the as-prepared samples were dried at 100 °C overnight. Subsequently, a sol-gel solution of Si (OC2H5)4 (1.3 mol) and HCl (13 mL) was introduced to the above mixture, and then stirred continuously until gelation was complete. After this, the product was washed with ethanol and water three times. The final product was then dried at 100 °C for 12 h. The samples prepared with various weight percentages of MIL-101(Cr) are denoted by MIL-101(Cr) (n%) (n = 0.00, 8.90, 12.29, 29.65, 42.43, 52.00)-SiO2. In addition, we prepared pure MIL-101(Cr) samples for comparison purposes.

3.3. Characterization of the Samples

In this study, different techniques were used to investigate the physico-chemical properties of the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites. The crystallography of the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites was investigated by Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Analytical X’Pert PRO) using filtered CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at a voltage of 45 kV, current of 40 mA, and scanned at 2θ from 2° to 20°. The surface morphology and composition were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHIS-3000H) with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX, KEPL JSAM 6700). The specific surface area was measured with N2 adsorption isotherms by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET, Micromeritics’ Gemini V) method. In addition, the thermal stability of all samples was analyzed by thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA, Pyris 6 TGA), under an N2 atmosphere. The water vapor adsorption capacity was studied using a Quantachrome Instrument (ChemBET®3000 TPR/TPD).

3.4. Water Vapor Adsorption Kinetics

Water vapor adsorption tests were carried out in a quartz tube containing 300 mg of each sample using the Quantachrome Instrument. All the samples were dehydrated under a helium flow of 50 mL/min at 120 ± 1 °C for five h before water vapor adsorption analysis. Then the water vapor MIL-101(Cr) (0.1 volume percentage balance with helium) was introduced into the reactor tube at a temperature of 30 ± 1 °C for 150 min. The amount of water vapor MIL-101(Cr) was calculated as the difference between the total and dry weights of the material. This measurement was repeated at least three times in order to confirm the reproducibility of the MIL-101(Cr) kinetics and the average results calculated. In recent years, several research groups have studied thermal characterization using the following kinetics equations [51,52]:
X water–sorption = Xt − X0/Xt,
where X0 and Xt are the total and dry weights of the MIL-101(Cr) composites, respectively.

4. Conclusions

A series of MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites was successfully synthesized by the microwave-assisted hydrothermal technique, as well as the sol-gel approach. The optimal concentration of 29.6% to 52% of MIL-101(Cr) in the silica was found to produce a well-developed mesoporous structure with a high surface area, which showed a remarkable water vapor adsorption capability. The Lewis and Brønsted sites confirm their porosity, and help to improve the adsorption kinetics on the surface of the material. The results obtained from this work open the door to using the MIL-101(Cr)-SiO2 composites in industrial applications in adsorption chillers.

Acknowledgments

Assistance received by the ROC Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 104-2119-M-027-001) is gratefully appreciated. We thank Ming-Fu Jiang, for experimental work.

Author Contributions

T.C.-K.Y. conceived the idea of experiments and contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; K.U. and G.-T.P. carried out the preparation and characterization of the samples; K.U., G.-T.P. and T.C.-K.Y. analyzed and discussed the results of the experiments. K.U. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Canivet, J.; Fateeva, A.; Guo, Y.; Coasne, B.; Farrusseng, D. Water adsorption in MOFs: Fundamentals and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5594–5617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tuan, A.V.; Le Giang, H.; Canh, D.D.; Lan, Q.D.; Kien, T.N.; Phuong, T.D.; Hoa, T.D.; Tran, T.K.; Duong, Q.T.; Nguyen, T.V. Isomorphous substitution of Cr by Fe in MIL-101 framework and its application as a novel heterogeneous photo-Fenton catalyst for reactive dye degradation. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 41185–41194. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, Z.; Zeng, H.C. Armored MOFs: Enforcing soft microporous MOF nanocrystals with hard mesoporous silica. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5631–5639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jacoby, Q.L.M. New Sorbents for Greener Cooling. Chem. Eng. News 2014, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, Z.; Xu, Q. Metal–organic framework composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5468–5512. [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin, W.; Annika, H.; Rene, T.; Barbara, M.; Christoph, J. Hierarchical MOF-xerogel monolithic composites from embedding MIL-100 (Fe, Cr) and MIL-101(Cr) in resorcinol-formaldehyde xerogels for water adsorption applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 215, 143–153. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferey, G. Hybrid porous solids: Past, present, future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 191–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dario, B.; Kate, M.; Gimona, N.M.; Hill, J.A.; Falcaro, P. Fast Synthesis of MOF-5 Microcrystals Using Sol−Gel SiO2 Nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 929–934. [Google Scholar]
  9. Choia, J.-S.; Sona, W.-J.; Kimb, J.; Ahna, W.-S. Metal–organic framework MOF-5 prepared by microwave heating: Factors to be considered. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 116, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yaghi, O.; Li, H. Hydrothermal synthesis of a metal-organic framework containing large rectangular 309 channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10401–10402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahmed, A.; Forster, M.; Jin, J.; Myers, P.; Zhang, H. Tuning morphology of nanostructured ZIF-8 on silica microspheres and applications in liquid chromatography and dye degradation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 18054–18063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Song, Y.; Hu, D.; Liu, F.; Chen, S.; Wang, L. Fabrication of fluorescent SiO2@zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 nanosensor for Cu2+ detection. Analyst 2015, 140, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yan, Z.; Zheng, J.; Chen, J.; Tong, P.; Lu, M.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, L. Preparation and evaluation of silica-UiO-66 composite as liquid chromatographic stationary phase for fast and efficient separation. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1366, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ameloot, R.; Liekens, A.; Alaerts, L.; Maes, M.; Galarneau, A.; Coq, B.; Desmet, G.; Sels, B.F.; Denayer, J.F.M.; de Vos, D.E. Silica-MOF composites as a stationary phase in liquid chromatography. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 24, 3735–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kong, S.; Dai, R.; Li, H.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y. Microwave Hydrothermal Synthesis of Ni-based Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Derived Yolk–Shell NiO for Li-Ion Storage and Supported Ammonia Borane for Hydrogen Desorption. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1830–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Amo-Ochoa, P.; Givaja, G.; Miguel, P.J.S.; Castillo, O.; Zamora, F. Microwave assisted hydrothermal synthesis of a novel Cu I-sulfate-pyrazine MOF. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2007, 10, 921–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Johanna, L.; Kelly, E.; Anderson, A.; Samantha, G. Conway, Hydrothermal Synthesis and Characterization of a Metal–Organic Framework by Thermogravimetric Analysis, Powder X-ray Diffraction, and Infrared Spectroscopy, An Integrative Inorganic Chemistry Experiment. J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92, 373–377. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liang, Y.; Yuan, W.G.; Zhang, S.F.; He, Z.; Xue, J.; Zhang, X.; Jing, L.H.; Qin, D.B. Hydrothermal synthesis and structural characterization of metal–organic frameworks based on new tetradentate ligands. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 1382–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Al-Kutubi, H.; Gascon, J.; Sudhölter, E.J.R.; Rassaei, L. Electrosynthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks: Challenges and Opportunities. ChemElectroChem 2015, 2, 462–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, H.-M.; Liu, X.; Song, X.-L.; Yang, T.-L.; Liang, Z.-H.; Fan, C.-M. In situ electrochemical synthesis of MOF-5 and its application in improving photocatalytic activity of BiOBr. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2015, 25, 3987–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Son, W.-J.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Ahn, W.-S. Sonochemical synthesis of MOF-5. Chem. Commun. 2008, 47, 6336–6338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abedi, S.; Tehrani, A.A.; Morsali, A. Mechanochemical synthesis of isoreticular metal–organic frameworks and comparative study of their potential for nitrobenzene sensing. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 5108–5111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Friscic, T. Metal-Organic Frameworks: Mechanochemical Synthesis Strategies, Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry, 1st ed.; John willey and Sons: Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. Klimakow, M. Mechanochemical synthesis of metal—Organic frameworks: A fast and facile approach toward quantitative yields and high specific surface area. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 5216–5221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, W.-X.; Tan, L.; Liu, Q.-P.; Qiang, G.-R.; Zhuang, G.-L. The ionothermal synthesis, structure, and magnetism–structure relationship of two biphenyl tetracarboxylic acid-based metal–organic frameworks. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 16515–16521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Klimakow, M.; Klobes, P.; Thünemann, A.F.; Rademann, K.; Emmerling, F. Ionothermal synthesis and proton-conductive properties of NH 2-MIL-53 MOF nanomaterials. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 525–528. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu, L.; Choi, E.Y.; Kwon, Y.U. Ionothermal synthesis of a 3D Zn–BTC metal-organic framework with distorted tetranuclear [Zn 4 (μ 4-O)] subunits. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2008, 11, 1190–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Parnham, E.R.; Morris, R.E. Ionothermal synthesis of zeolites, metal-organic frameworks, and inorganic-organic hybrids. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Das, A.K.; Vemuri, R.S.; Kutnyakov, I.; Peter McGrail, B.; Motkuri, R.K. An Efficient Synthesis Strategy for Metal-Organic Frameworks: Dry-Gel Synthesis of MOF-74 Framework with High Yield and Improved Performance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ahmed, I.; Jeon, J.; Khan, N.; Jhung, S.H. Synthesis of a Metal–Organic Framework, Iron-Benezenetricarboxylate, from Dry Gels in the Absence of Acid and Salt. Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 5878–5881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Faustini, M.; Kim, J.; Jeong, G.Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Moon, H.R.; Ahn, W.S.; Kim, D.P. Microfluidic approach toward continuous and ultrafast synthesis of metal–organic framework crystals and hetero structures in confined microdroplets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 14619–14626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liang, K.; Ricco, R.; Reboul, J.; Furukawa, S.; Falcaro, P. Sol–Gel for Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs). In The Sol-Gel Handbook-Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications; Levy, D., Zayat, M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; Volume 3, pp. 471–486. [Google Scholar]
  33. Furukawa, H.; Gándara, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wendy, J.J.; Queen, L.; Matthew, R.; Hudson, R.; Omar, M.; Yaghi, M. Water adsorption in porous metal-organic frameworks and related materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4369–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Burtch, N.C.; Jasuja, H.; Walton, K.S. Water stability and adsorption in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 10575–10612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sienkiewicz-Gromiuk, J.; Rusinek, I.; Kurach, Ł.; Rzączyńska, Z. Thermal and spectroscopic (IR, XPS) properties of lanthanide (III) benzene-1,3,5-triacetate complexes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2006, 126, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pan, G.-T.; Lai, M.-H.; Juang, R.-C.; Chung, T.-W.; Yang, T.C.-K. Preparation of visible-light-driven silver vanadates by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method for the photodegradation of volatile organic vapors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 807–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brown, D.W.; Floyd, A.J.; Sainsbury, M. Organic Spectroscopy; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pan, G.-T.; Chong, S.; Yang, T.C.-K.; Yang, Y.-L.; Arjun, N. Surface Modification of Amorphous SiO2 Nanoparticles by Oxygen-Plasma and Nitrogen-Plasma Treatments. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2016, 203, 1666–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fazaeli, R.; Aliyan, H.; Moghadam, M.; Masoudinia, M. Nano-rod catalysts: Building MOF bottles (MIL-101 family as heterogeneous single-site catalysts) around vanadium oxide ships. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 374, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Li, J.; Dong, J. Synthesis of metal–organic framework MIL-101 in TMAOH-Cr (NO 3) 3-H 2 BDC-H 2 O and its hydrogen- storage behavior. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 130, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abid, H.R.; Ang, H.M.; Wang, S. Effects of ammonium hydroxide on the structure and gas adsorption of nanosized Zr-MOFs (UiO-66). Nanoscale 2012, 4, 3089–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, S.; Bromberg, L.; Schreuder-Gibson, H.; Alan Hatton, T. Organophophorous Ester Degradation by Chromium (III) Terephthalate Metal−Organic Framework (MIL-101) Chelated to N,N-Dimethylaminopyridine and Related Aminopyridines. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Donohue, M.; Aranovich, G. Classification of Gibbs adsorption isotherms. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 76, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Neves, G.M.; Lenza, R.F.S.; Vasconcelos, W.L. Evaluation of the Microwaves in the Structure of Silica Gels. Mater. Res. 2002, 5, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rong, X.Z.; Du, H.K.; Wang, S.-X.; Liu, D.-W. Chang, A.-H. Effects of taurine on type I and III collagen expression in rats lung exposed to silica. Chin. J. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Dis. 2006, 9, 544–546. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mu, B.; Walton, K.S. Thermal Analysis and Heat Capacity Study of Metal–Organic Frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 22748–22754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yan, X.; Hu, X.; Komarneni, S. Facile synthesis of mesoporous MOF/silica composites. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 57501–57504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qiu, L.-G.; Xu, T.; Li, Z.-Q.; Wang, W.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Tian, X.-Y.; Zhang, L.-D. Hierarchically Micro-and Mesoporous Metal–Organic Frameworks with Tunable Porosity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9487–9491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yang, D.-A.; Cho, H.-Y.; Kim, J.; Yang, S.-T.; Ahn, W.-S. CO2 capture and conversion using Mg-MOF-74 prepared by a sonochemical method. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6465–6473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, S.N.; Yang, S.T.; Kim, J.; Park, J.; Ahn, W.-S. Post-synthesis functionalization of MIL-101 using diethylenetriamine: A study on adsorption and catalysis. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 4142–4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tsung-Yu, T.; Wu, P.-C.; Liao, K.-T.; Huang, H.-Y.; Lin, C.-H.; Hsu, J.-S.; Lee, W. Purification of deteriorated liquid crystals by employing porous metal–organic-framework/polymer composites. Opt. Mater. Exp. 2015, 5, 639–647. [Google Scholar]
  52. Chong, S.; Pan, G.-T.; Khalid, M.; Yang, T.C.-K.; Hung, S.-T.; Huang, C.-M. Physical Characterization and Pre-assessment of Recycled High-Density Polyethylene as 3D Printing Material. J. Polym. Environ. 2016, 1, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 10 00610 g001 550
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites with different MIL-101(Cr) percentages.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites with different MIL-101(Cr) percentages.
Materials 10 00610 g001
Materials 10 00610 g002 550
Figure 2. PXRD patterns of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites (a) before and (b) after water adsorption treatment: (A) MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO2, (B) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, (C) MIL-101(Cr) (29.60%)-SiO2, (D) MIL-101(Cr)(42.43%)-SiO2, (E) MIL-101(Cr) (52.00%)-SiO2, (F) different percentages of MIL-101(Cr) in MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites.
Figure 2. PXRD patterns of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites (a) before and (b) after water adsorption treatment: (A) MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO2, (B) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, (C) MIL-101(Cr) (29.60%)-SiO2, (D) MIL-101(Cr)(42.43%)-SiO2, (E) MIL-101(Cr) (52.00%)-SiO2, (F) different percentages of MIL-101(Cr) in MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites.
Materials 10 00610 g002
Materials 10 00610 g003 550
Figure 3. The SEM images of different ratios of chromium nitrate/terephthalic acid/hydrofluoric acid ((A-1 and A-2) 1:1:4, (B-1 and B-2) 1:1:2, and (C-1 and C-2) 1:1:1.4).
Figure 3. The SEM images of different ratios of chromium nitrate/terephthalic acid/hydrofluoric acid ((A-1 and A-2) 1:1:4, (B-1 and B-2) 1:1:2, and (C-1 and C-2) 1:1:1.4).
Materials 10 00610 g003
Materials 10 00610 g004 550
Figure 4. The SEM images of MOF composites prepared using microwave-assisted hydrothermal method with different time interval. (A) 20 (B) 30 (C) 40 (D) 50 and (E) 60 min.
Figure 4. The SEM images of MOF composites prepared using microwave-assisted hydrothermal method with different time interval. (A) 20 (B) 30 (C) 40 (D) 50 and (E) 60 min.
Materials 10 00610 g004
Materials 10 00610 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of the (A) MIL-101(Cr) (0.00%)-SiO2, (B) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, (C) MIL-101(Cr) (29.65%)-SiO2, (D) MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 and (E) MIL-101(Cr) MIL-101(Cr) (52.00%)-SiO2.
Figure 5. SEM images of the (A) MIL-101(Cr) (0.00%)-SiO2, (B) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, (C) MIL-101(Cr) (29.65%)-SiO2, (D) MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 and (E) MIL-101(Cr) MIL-101(Cr) (52.00%)-SiO2.
Materials 10 00610 g005
Materials 10 00610 g006 550
Figure 6. TGA thermograms of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites under nitrogen atmosphere at (A) 75 °C, (B) 80 °C, and (C) 95 °C.
Figure 6. TGA thermograms of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites under nitrogen atmosphere at (A) 75 °C, (B) 80 °C, and (C) 95 °C.
Materials 10 00610 g006
Materials 10 00610 g007 550
Figure 7. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms for MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites: (A) commercial Silica gel, (B) MIL-101(Cr) (0%)-SiO2, (C) MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO2, (D) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, (E) MIL-101(Cr) (29.6)-SiO2, (F) MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2, (G) MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO2, (H) MIL-101(Cr) (100%).
Figure 7. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms for MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites: (A) commercial Silica gel, (B) MIL-101(Cr) (0%)-SiO2, (C) MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO2, (D) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO2, (E) MIL-101(Cr) (29.6)-SiO2, (F) MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2, (G) MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO2, (H) MIL-101(Cr) (100%).
Materials 10 00610 g007
Materials 10 00610 g008 550
Figure 8. Water vapor adsorption behavior of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites. Red symbol MIL-101(Cr) (0%)-SiO2 and blue symbol MIL-101(Cr) (100%) composites.
Figure 8. Water vapor adsorption behavior of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites. Red symbol MIL-101(Cr) (0%)-SiO2 and blue symbol MIL-101(Cr) (100%) composites.
Materials 10 00610 g008
Materials 10 00610 g009 550
Figure 9. Water vapor adsorption and desorption stability of MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 composites.
Figure 9. Water vapor adsorption and desorption stability of MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO2 composites.
Materials 10 00610 g009
Table
Table 1. Molar ratios of elements present on the MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites.
Table 1. Molar ratios of elements present on the MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites.
SampleMolar Ratios of Elements
SiOCr
(a) MIL-101(Cr) (0%)-SiO21.002.980.00
(b) MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO21.002.870.03
(c) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO21.002.730.04
(d) MIL-101(Cr) (29.60%)-SiO21.002.650.08
(e) MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO21.002.630.12
(f) MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO21.002.520.15
(g) MIL-101(Cr) (100%)02.510.19
Table
Table 2. BET surface area and Langmuir surface area of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites.
Table 2. BET surface area and Langmuir surface area of MIL-101(Cr) (n%)-SiO2 composites.
SampleBET Surface Area (m2/g)Langmuir Surface Area (m2/g)
Commercial SiO2162981
(a) MIL-101(Cr) (0%)-SiO21931221
(b) MIL-101(Cr) (8.70%)-SiO22351408
(c) MIL-101(Cr) (12.29%)-SiO22792028
(d) MIL-101(Cr) (29.60%)-SiO23442143
(e) MIL-101(Cr) (42.43%)-SiO23502248
(f) MIL-101(Cr) (52%)-SiO23812678
(g) MIL-101(Cr) (100%)7254238

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uma, K.; Pan, G.-T.; Yang, T.C.-K. The Preparation of Porous Sol-Gel Silica with Metal Organic Framework MIL-101(Cr) by Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Method for Adsorption Chillers. Materials 2017, 10, 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10060610

AMA Style

Uma K, Pan G-T, Yang TC-K. The Preparation of Porous Sol-Gel Silica with Metal Organic Framework MIL-101(Cr) by Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Method for Adsorption Chillers. Materials. 2017; 10(6):610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10060610

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uma, Kasimayan, Guan-Ting Pan, and Thomas C-K. Yang. 2017. "The Preparation of Porous Sol-Gel Silica with Metal Organic Framework MIL-101(Cr) by Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Method for Adsorption Chillers" Materials 10, no. 6: 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10060610

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop