Next Article in Journal
Investigation on Electrostatical Breakup of Bio-Oil Droplets
Next Article in Special Issue
Time Domain Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Gear Contact Force in a Wind Turbine Gearbox with Respect to Fatigue Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Exergy Analysis of an Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Gas Turbine Hybrid System Fed with Ethanol
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Site-Specific Wind Field Parameters and Their Effect on Loads of Offshore Wind Turbines
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2012, 5(11), 4288-4322;

A Comparison of Wind Flow Models for Wind Resource Assessment in Wind Energy Applications

École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
K.C. Irving Chair in Sustainable Development, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB E1A 3E9, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 August 2012 / Revised: 22 October 2012 / Accepted: 23 October 2012 / Published: 29 October 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wind Turbines)
Full-Text   |   PDF [4555 KB, uploaded 17 March 2015]   |  


The objective of this work was to assess the accuracy of various coupled mesoscale-microscale wind flow modeling methodologies for wind energy applications. This is achieved by examining and comparing mean wind speeds from several wind flow modeling methodologies with observational measurements from several 50 m met towers distributed across the study area. At the mesoscale level, with a 5 km resolution, two scenarios are examined based on the Mesoscale Compressible Community Model (MC2) model: the Canadian Wind Energy Atlas (CWEA) scenario, which is based on standard input data, and the CWEA High Definition (CWEAHD) scenario where high resolution land cover input data is used. A downscaling of the obtained mesoscale wind climate to the microscale level is then performed, where two linear microscale models, i.e., MsMicro and the Wind Atlas Analysis and Application Program (WAsP), are evaluated following three downscaling scenarios: CWEA-WAsP, CWEA-MsMicro and CWEAHD-MsMicro. Results show that, for the territory studied, with a modeling approach based on the MC2 and MsMicro models, also known as Wind Energy Simulation Toolkit (WEST), the use of high resolution land cover and topography data at the mesoscale level helps reduce modeling errors for both the mesoscale and microscale models, albeit only marginally. At the microscale level, results show that the MC2-WAsP modeling approach gave substantially better results than both MC2 and MsMicro modeling approaches due to tweaked meso-micro coupling. View Full-Text
Keywords: wind flow models; wind resource assessment; WAsP; MC2; MsMicro; microscale; mesoscale wind flow models; wind resource assessment; WAsP; MC2; MsMicro; microscale; mesoscale

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).
Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Gasset, N.; Landry, M.; Gagnon, Y. A Comparison of Wind Flow Models for Wind Resource Assessment in Wind Energy Applications. Energies 2012, 5, 4288-4322.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top