Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of SiC Power Module with Reduced Footprint for High Power Density Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Review of the Application of Schlieren Systems in the Field of Hydrogen and Hydrogen Blends
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tube-Shaped Solid–Liquid Beam-Pumping Energy Harvester Based on Self-Assembled Materials

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(7), 1694; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071694 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 February 2026 / Revised: 23 March 2026 / Accepted: 27 March 2026 / Published: 30 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section B2: Clean Energy)

Abstract

Amidst the high global reliance on petroleum, this study addresses energy inefficiency in beam-pumping units used for oil extraction. We developed a tubular solid–liquid triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) based on fluorinated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) films. Self-assembled surface modification with fluorosilane molecular chains enhanced charge transfer, achieving a 2.7-fold increase with 13F-PDMS. The enclosed tubular design utilizes periodic liquid-electrode contact to generate a volumetric effect. Experiments investigated the influence of liquid composition and device configuration on performance. Using a 1.69 mol/L FeCl3 solution with four series-connected units, the TENG reached 29 V and 263 nA, powering 150 LEDs. This demonstrates its potential for harvesting reciprocating mechanical energy from pumping units to reduce operational energy consumption.

1. Introduction

Currently, approximately 90% of the energy in the global transportation sector relies on petroleum products. Consequently, large-scale petroleum extraction remains unavoidable in the short-term [1,2]. Petroleum is primarily extracted using beam-pumping units (nodding donkeys) [3,4]. These operate by performing cyclic up-and-down reciprocating motions several times per minute to lift oil. To date, such equipment suffers from relatively low operational efficiency, high energy consumption, and cumbersome design during long strokes [5,6]. Common strategies to address these issues include variable-frequency speed control to reduce mechanical wear, integration with sensors for intelligent monitoring to lower costs, or technical modifications to reduce the load on the pumping rod, which can simultaneously improve energy efficiency and extend equipment lifespan [7,8,9]. While various designs aim to reduce losses from the reciprocating motion of pumping units, the harvested energy is better viewed as auxiliary power rather than a means to cut the main energy consumption of pumping. The TENG developed here can capture small amounts of electrical energy from the reciprocating motion, which can be used to power low-power monitoring or sensing devices in oilfields [10].
The solid–liquid triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG), based on the coupling effect of triboelectrification and electrostatic induction, is an emerging micro-energy harvesting system capable of efficiently converting low-frequency, irregular mechanical energy from water into electrical energy. It offers advantages such as light weight, diverse material choices, and low cost [11,12,13]. Furthermore, solid–liquid TENGs have numerous precedents in harvesting mechanical energy from the environment, such as capturing the gravitational potential energy of raindrops or ocean energy [14,15]. Currently, approaches to enhance the electrification performance of solid–liquid TENGs primarily fall into two categories: first, modifying the device structure to improve performance; second, modifying the solid surface friction layer to enhance electrification [16]. For instance, Lin et al. improved the output performance of a solid–liquid TENG by modifying the surface morphology of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to increase its contact area with water molecules [17]. In 2022, Liu et al. employed an iterative rheo-forging process to produce dielectric films with excellent mechanical properties and good transparency. Due to the effective modulation of surface functional group composition, crystallinity, and dielectric constant, the fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) films prepared via this method maintained a high charge density of 510 μC·m−2 [18].
The aforementioned methods for modifying polymeric materials are limited by the short-range ordered but long-range disordered structure of polymers, which hinders the full potential for increasing the contact electrification signal with water [19]. Therefore, we utilized a self-assembly approach to introduce characteristic functional groups onto the surface. This technique allows the introduced functional groups to bond chemically with the film surface, significantly enhancing the contact electrification efficiency with water [20,21].
For the beam-pumping unit (nodding donkey) used in petroleum extraction equipment, we designed a tubular solid–liquid TENG. Different from the conventional solid–liquid TENGs that adopt unmodified PDMS or simple modified PDMS as the solid friction layer, the solid film material for this TENG was chosen to be fluorinated self-assembled PDMS. The surface of this self-assembled film features an ordered long-chain molecular structure that provides more contact sites when interacting with water molecules, thereby improving the electrical signal [22]. Furthermore, due to the presence of fluorine in the functional groups—an element with strong electronegativity—the friction layer surface can generate more negative charge after contact with water, resulting in superior electrification performance [23]. Additionally, considering the unique operational mode of the beam-pumping unit (reciprocal swing) and the deficiency that existing tubular TENGs rarely integrate with petroleum extraction equipment and lack volumetric effect design, we designed an enclosed tubular structure. When this device moves with the reciprocating swing of the pumping unit, the internal auxiliary electrodes periodically contact and separate from the liquid [24]. We also tested the impact of different liquid compositions on electrification performance [25]. Experiments demonstrated that varying liquid components influence the electrical signal, which is primarily determined by the working mechanism of solid–liquid TENGs, yet a stable electrical output was maintained [26]. Recent studies on oil-related triboelectric nanogenerators have provided valuable insights: Li et al. [27] systematically studied the regulation of oil–solid interface electrification by solid wall properties and developed a self-powered early-warning sensor; Rodrigues et al. [28] verified that TENGs can operate stably in crude oil environments with pressures up to 830 bar and temperatures up to 120 °C. However, existing oil-related TENG studies either focus on electrostatic hazard prevention [27] or general harsh environment adaptation [28], and few are tailored for the specific reciprocating motion of beam-pumping units. In summary, these findings indicate that this tubular solid–liquid TENG can be utilized to harvest the mechanical energy generated during the operation of beam-pumping units. This fills the gap between solid–liquid TENG technology and practical application in petroleum extraction, complementing the existing oil-related TENG research and providing a new solution for energy recovery in beam-pumping unit operation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Trichloro(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)silane (MW: 231.5, Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), dodecyltrichlorosilane (MW: 303.77, Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.), 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane (MW: 681.57, Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.), trichloro(1H,1H,2H,2H-tridecafluorooctyl) silane (MW: 481.53, Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) prepolymer, PDMS curing agent, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), NaCl crystals, and FeCl3 crystals were all purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. The platinum (Pt) electrode (purity 99.99%) was obtained from Shanghai Yuemag Electronic Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was supplied by Suzhou Shuangxiang Optical Material Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China). Aluminum foil was provided by Jiangyin Meiyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. (Jiangyin, China).

2.2. Preparation of Self-Assembled PDMS

First, 4 g of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) prepolymer and 0.4 g of PDMS curing agent were weighed using an analytical balance. The prepolymer and curing agent were mixed at a mass ratio of 10:1 and stirred thoroughly. The mixture was degassed under a vacuum of −0.09 MPa for 20 min using a vacuum pump to eliminate air bubbles introduced during stirring. Subsequently, the homogeneous mixture was poured into a horizontally placed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mold. After allowing the mixture to spread evenly within the mold, it was transferred to an oven and cured at 60 °C for 6 h. Following curing, the resulting PDMS film was peeled off from the mold. The above procedure was repeated to prepare five PDMS films. These films were cut into pieces measuring 20 mm × 50 mm. Four samples were selected and subjected to oxygen plasma surface treatment at 50 W for 30 s under a pressure of 0.2 mbar. Each treated film was then placed in a separate glass weighing bottle. Next, four portions of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), each 15 milliliters, were prepared. Into each portion, 0.1 g of one of the four different fluorinated compounds was added. At this point, the concentration of the fluorinated compound in the liquid was 6.67 g/L. At this concentration, the number of fluorinated compound molecules in the solution was sufficient to form a dense and ordered adsorption layer on the substrate surface. It could not only avoid the problems of incomplete self-assembly and discontinuous film caused by too low concentration, but also prevented the excessive aggregation of molecules due to too high concentration, which would further lead to uneven film thickness, rough surface, and poor structural stability. Each mixture was sonicated for 5 min to ensure complete dissolution of the compound in DMF. The resulting solutions were separately poured into the glass weighing bottles containing the plasma-treated PDMS films. The bottles were sealed and left undisturbed for 48 h. After this immersion period, the films were removed. Residual compounds on the film surfaces were cleaned off using ethanol. Finally, the films were air-dried, yielding four types of self-assembled PDMS films.

2.3. Characterizations and Measurement

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was utilized to characterize the chemical states of the various elements present in PDMS, using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha instrument (Waltham, MA, USA). The valence states of these elements can be further inferred from the acquired chemical state information. The morphology and corresponding roughness parameters of the obtained films were investigated under ambient conditions using an atomic force microscope (AFM, Bruker Dimension Icon, Berlin, Germany). To determine the chemical composition of the obtained films and surface modifications, attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was performed using a fully digital vacuum FTIR spectrometer (VERTEX 80V, Bruker, Berlin, Germany). All TENG signals were measured by an electrometer, Keithley 6514 (provided by Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA).

3. Results

The fabrication process flow for the four types of self-assembled PDMS films is illustrated in Figure 1a, and schematic diagrams of the molecular chains of the four chemical agents are shown in Figure 1b. Detailed fabrication procedures can be found in the Experimental section.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) characterization was performed on the five prepared PDMS films. Figure 1c–g presents the AFM images of the five PDMS films, while Figure 1h–l shows schematic illustrations of the surface roughness profiles for the five PDMS samples. The surface of the non-fluorinated PDMS film was relatively smooth with low roughness. In contrast, the PDMS film modified with molecular chains via self-assembly exhibited a micro-nano structure with distinct wrinkles, while maintaining overall uniformity.
To elucidate the chemical bonding information on the surfaces of the five self-assembled PDMS films, high-resolution C1s and F1s XPS surface characterization analyses were conducted. As shown in Figure 2a, the C1s spectrum of the non-fluorinated PDMS revealed three characteristic peaks: the C-H bond at 283.86 eV, the C-C bond at 284.80 eV, and the C-Si bond at 285.70 eV. Figure 2b shows that the C1s spectrum of 12C-PDMS exhibited two characteristic peaks: the C-C bond at 284.80 eV and the C-O bond at 286.77 eV. The presence of the C-O bond may result from the plasma treatment applied to the sample. Figure 2c,d presents the C1s and F1s spectra of 3F-PDMS. The characteristic peak for the CF3 bond appearing at 686.30 eV in the F1s spectrum indicates the successful attachment of fluorosilane molecular chains to the PDMS film surface [29]. Figure 2e,f shows the C1s and F1s spectra of 13F-PDMS. In the C1s spectrum, two characteristic peaks appeared at 291.26 eV and 293.63 eV, corresponding to the CF2 and CF3 bonds, respectively. Concurrently, the characteristic peak at 688.48 eV in the F1s spectrum was attributed to the CF2 bond. The presence of CF2/CF3 bonds confirms the successful introduction of fluorosilane molecular chains onto the 13F-PDMS surface. Figure 2g,h displays the C1s and F1s spectra of 17F-PDMS. Similar characteristic features were observable in these spectra, with the characteristic peaks at 290.54 eV in the C1s spectrum and at 687.65 eV in the F1s spectrum both assigned to CF2 bonds. The above XPS data collectively indicate the successful grafting of fluorosilane molecular chains onto the PDMS surface.
The chemical bonding characteristics of the samples were further validated using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. As illustrated in Figure 2i, the five PDMS films exhibited several characteristic absorption peaks: the peak at 1042 cm−1 was attributed to the asymmetric stretching vibration of the Si-O-Si bond; the characteristic peak at 1256 cm−1 corresponded to the stretching vibration of the C-F bond in organofluorine compounds; and the absorption band observed at 2959 cm−1 can be ascribed to the symmetric stretching vibration of C-H bonds [30]. The FTIR results confirm that the different fluorinated molecular chains have successfully bonded to the PDMS.
To evaluate the electrification performance of the five different PDMS films, an electrical signal measurement system was constructed, as shown in Figure 3a [31]. The test PDMS film (20 mm × 50 mm) was fixed onto a plate with adjustable inclination. A rubber-bulb dropper was positioned above the film to dispense 2 mL of deionized water per droplet. A Faraday cup was placed directly beneath the film to collect the water after it flowed over the film surface. The triboelectric charge carried by the droplet was measured as it fell into the Faraday cup. According to the electric double layer (EDL) model illustrated in Figure 3b, the Stern layer is tightly adsorbed onto the test film, indicating that the triboelectric charge is associated with the diffuse layer retained within the droplet. Therefore, the internal triboelectric charge of the liquid and the surface potential can be used to indicate the charge density on the test film.
Using the aforementioned test system, measurements were conducted on the five PDMS films at inclination angles of 30°, 45°, and 60°. The results showed that the electrical signals of the fluorinated PDMS films were enhanced to varying degrees. This improvement is primarily attributed to the ordered surface structure providing more contact sites with water molecules, thereby enhancing the electrical signal. Furthermore, the presence of fluorine in the functional groups—an element with strong electronegativity—enables the generation of more negative charges on the friction layer surface after contact with water, leading to superior electrification performance. Among them, the 13F-PDMS film exhibited the best electrification performance, with its charge transfer amount enhanced by 2.7 times compared to the untreated PDMS film. Additionally, the signal intensity generally increased with a larger inclination angle across the three tested angles, mainly because a steeper angle results in a higher relative velocity of the droplet over the film surface.
To further investigate the influence of film morphology on electrification performance, the surface of the 13F-PDMS film (which showed the best performance) was modified from flat to three different types: concave, convex, and concave-convex, thereby increasing the contact area between the droplet and the film. The electrification performance of these three morphologies was tested using the same system. The results, shown in Figure 3e, indicate that while the concave-convex morphology performed best among the three modified types, all yielded lower signals than the flat 13F-PDMS. This is primarily because although the contact area increased, the droplet flow velocity decreased, with the uneven morphology having the least impact on slowing the droplet [32,33,34].
Subsequently, to study the effect of different ion concentrations on electrification performance, deionized water was replaced with a 1.69 mol/L FeCl3 solution and a saturated NaCl solution. The electrical signals for the three 13F-PDMS morphologies in these solutions are shown in Figure 3f,g, respectively. In the 1.69 mol/L FeCl3 solution, the electrification performance of all three morphologies increased to varying degrees. This is because the increased ion concentration in the solution enhances its conductivity, reduces the solution resistance (R_W), and thereby significantly accelerates electron transfer in the external circuit. Conversely, in the saturated NaCl solution, the performance of all three morphologies decreased. High NaCl concentration can also suppress electrical output, as a large number of Na+ ions can screen the local surface negative charges on the 13F-PDMS, forming an interfacial screening effect as illustrated in Figure 3i, leading to a reduction in effective surface charge density.
Furthermore, during testing of the 13F-PDMS, pure water (pH 7), acidic (HCl) solutions (pH 2 and 3), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solutions (pH 11 and 12) were used to assess the impact of pH on output performance. At pH 3 or 11, the electrical signals for all three 13F-PDMS morphologies increased. This is primarily attributed to the appropriate increase in ion concentration lowering the liquid’s resistance, as mentioned earlier. Additionally, 13F-PDMS tends to adsorb hydroxyl ions (OH-) from water, as shown in Figure 3j(iii), which contributes significantly to charge storage. However, under strong acid and strong alkaline conditions (pH2, pH12), the performance dropped sharply, even below that at pH 7. In alkaline environments, as pH increases, the concentration of Na+ ions also rises, thereby enhancing the screening effect and inhibiting electron transfer. In strongly acidic environments, a high concentration of H+ ions not only suppresses electron transfer to reduce output, but also adsorbs onto the 13F-PDMS surface, causing a reversal of surface potential, as depicted in Figure 3j(i).
Based on the aforementioned research, we designed a tubular solid–liquid triboelectric nanogenerator (TEB-TENG) utilizing 13F-PDMS as the solid material, as shown in Figure 4a. A 13F-PDMS film was cut into a circular shape with a diameter of 4 cm and attached at the back to an aluminum (Al) electrode. A platinum (Pt) electrode with a length of 2 cm was vertically inserted into a 12-cm-long, 4-cm-diameter PMMA tube, positioned at a distance of 8 cm from the film surface. Contact between the Pt electrode and the liquid completes a closed circuit. This design induces a volumetric effect, as the attached (Pt) electrode periodically contacts and separates from the liquid during the device’s swinging motion. Furthermore, the enclosed tubular structure effectively prevents liquid contamination.
After finalizing the device structure, we conducted experiments to investigate the influence of varying liquid volume on the electrification signal. The TEB-TENG was operated at a 45° inclination with a periodic motion frequency of 0.75 Hz, using deionized water as the liquid medium. To accurately simulate the reciprocating motion of beam-pumping units, the displacement amplitude of the periodic motion was quantified as 50 mm, the acceleration was measured as 0.89 m/s2, and the mechanical energy input per cycle was calculated to be 0.013 J. The liquid volume was incrementally increased by 10 mL from an initial 10 mL. The voltage output is shown in Figure 4c. Experiments revealed that the optimal electrification performance was achieved at a liquid volume of 40 mL. This is determined by the working principle of the solid–liquid TENG. We define the moment when the liquid and the Pt electrode become separated as t1, and the moment when they re-establish contact as t2. Between t1 and t2, with the electrode separated from the water, the overall circuit is open. The change in the contact area between the 13F-PDMS and water during this interval creates a potential difference between the 13F-PDMS and its back electrode. A greater difference in the water-13F-PDMS contact area between t1 and t2 results in a larger potential difference, leading to a stronger instantaneous current upon re-contact at t2. A detailed working principle schematic is provided in Figure 4b.
Figure 4d,e shows the output current and transferred charge during operation with 40 mL of deionized water. Figure 4f is a schematic diagram of the device during operation. A single device achieved an output current of up to 8.5 nA and a transferred charge of 2 nC in deionized water. Its electrification performance can be further enhanced by increasing the ion concentration in the liquid or by connecting multiple devices in series.
After establishing the fundamental working principle, we further investigated the influence of different device dimensions on the electrical signal output. The diameter of the device was varied—reduced to 2 cm and increased to 8 cm—while maintaining the same operational mode and using deionized water as the liquid medium. The corresponding electrical signals are shown in Figure S1. The experiments revealed that reducing the diameter leads to an overall decrease in output performance. This is primarily attributed to the reduced contact area between the water and the 13F-PDMS film in smaller diameters, resulting in a smaller accumulated potential difference during the circuit-open period. Conversely, increasing the diameter enlarges the water-13F-PDMS contact area and thus increases the accumulated potential difference. However, while the spatial footprint quadruples when the diameter increases from 4 cm to 8 cm, the enhancement in electrical signal is limited and far from quadruple. Therefore, under the constraint of a similar spatial footprint, we considered connecting multiple devices in series.
Consequently, we replaced the deionized water with the aforementioned 1.69 mol/L FeCl3 aqueous solution and connected four TEB-TENG units, each with a 4 cm diameter, in series, as shown in Figure 5d. The electrical output performance is presented in Figure 5a–c. The open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current reached 29 V and 263 nA, respectively, with a transferred charge of 10 nC per motion cycle. The charge density was calculated to be 0.796 nC/cm2.
The output current and voltage of the four series-connected TBE-TENGs under different load resistances were measured in the 1.69 mol/L FeCl3 solution, as shown in Figure 5e. As the load resistance increased from 10 Ω to 109Ω, the output current decreased from 21 μA to 0.003 μA. The maximum output power of the four series-connected TEB-TENGs reached 2.49 mW at a load resistance of 250 kΩ, corresponding to a power density of 49.52 mW/cm2. Figure 5f shows a photograph of the setup successfully powering 150 LED bulbs during the operation of the four TBE-TENGs. Additionally, the energy conversion efficiency was calculated to be 19.15%. Furthermore, the device could still maintain a stable current output under long-term operation mode, as shown in Figure S2.

4. Conclusions

A tubular solid–liquid TENG was successfully developed using self-assembled fluorinated PDMS films for energy harvesting from beam-pumping units. The 13F-PDMS film showed optimal performance due to enhanced surface charge transfer. The enclosed design effectively utilized volumetric effects through liquid–electrode interaction. System performance was influenced by liquid ion concentration and pH, with the FeCl3 solution yielding the best results. Series connection of four units generated sufficient power for practical applications. At a load resistance of 250 kΩ, the output power reached 2.49 mW, corresponding to a power density of 49.52 mW/cm2 and an energy conversion efficiency of 19.15%. This work provides a feasible method for harvesting mechanical energy during oil extraction. Rather than reducing the primary energy consumption of pumping operations, the TENG can recover auxiliary electrical energy from the reciprocating motion of beam-pumping units, which can be used to power low-power monitoring or sensing devices in oilfields. Future work should focus on long-term stability and system integration.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/en19071694/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. and J.W.; Methodology, S.L. and J.W.; Experiment, Z.G. and W.X.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Z.G.; Writing—Review and Editing, Z.G., M.L. (Mei Liu) and M.L. (Minghui Li); Supervision, S.L. and Z.G.; Project Administration, S.L. and M.L. (Mei Liu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22409023); the Doctoral Research Startup Fund of Liaoning Province (No. 2025BS0211); the Beijing Key Laboratory of High Entropy Energy materials and Devices, Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems (No. GS2025MS017); and the Start-Up Funds for Talent Research (02502439).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TENGTriboelectric Nanogenerator
FEPFluorinated Ethylene Propylene
PTFEPolytetrafluoroethylene
AFMAtomic Force Microscopy
FT-IRFourier Transform Infrared
EDLElectric Double Layer
TEB-TENGTubular Solid–Liquid Triboelectric Nanogenerator

References

  1. Balza, L.H.; De Los Rios, C.; Mori, R.J.; Manzano, O. The local human capital costs of oil exploitation. J. Dev. Econ. 2025, 173, 103410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Al Zarkani, H.M.; Mezher, T.; El-Fadel, M. Life cycle assessment in the petroleum industry: A systematic framework towards improved environmental performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 408, 137196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jalikop, S.V.; Albishini, R.; Freudenberger, M.; Scheichl, B.; Langbauer, C.; Eder, S.J. An Extended Computational Fluid Dynamics Model and Its Experimental Validation to Improve Sucker Rod Pump Operation and Design. SPE J. 2025, 30, 6249–6261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gao, Z.W.; Jia, S. Modeling and Control for Beam Pumping Units: An Overview. Processes 2024, 12, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, X. Review of variable speed drive technology in beam pumping units for energy-saving. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 1472–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, K.; Han, Y.; Wang, T. A novel prediction method for down-hole working conditions of the beam pumping unit based on 8-directions chain codes and online sequential extreme learning machine. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 160, 285–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, Z.; Wang, X.; Huang, J.; Tan, C.; Zhao, Y. Intelligent diagnostic method for beam pumping units based on torque indicator cards. Measurement 2025, 242, 115903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; Guo, Q.Y.; Fu, C.L.; Dai, G.; Xia, C.Y.; Qian, L.Q. A novel optimization scheme for structure and balance of compound balanced beam pumping units using the PSO, GA, and GWO algorithms. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, 1340–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feng, Z.M.; Guo, C.; Zhang, D.; Cui, W.; Tan, C.D.; Xu, X.F.; Zhang, Y. Variable speed drive optimization model and analysis of comprehensive performance of beam pumping unit. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 191, 107155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, R.; Zha, X.; Hu, H.; Lei, B. A comprehensive review of road mechanical energy harvesting technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khanapurarm, U.K.; Rani, G.M.; Panda, S.; Ratcharoonsuk, T.; Mistewicz, K.; Hajra, S.; Kaja, K.R.; Umapathi, R.; Sriphan, S.; Jała, J.; et al. Harvesting Energy from Friction: The Revolutionary Decade of Triboelectric Nanogenerators. Adv. Powder Mater. 2025, 4, 100373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, H.; Zhao, L.; Guo, H.; Zhang, D.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Peng, Y. Tribo-mechano transduction of solid-liquid triboelectric nanogenerators via boundary layer theory. Renew. Energy 2025, 209, 124958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiang, T.; Chen, X.; Sun, H.; Liu, D.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, S.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, S. Advances in liquid-solid triboelectric nanogenerators and its applications. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 214, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Z.; Yang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, S.; Cao, B.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.L.; Yin, F. A droplet-based electricity generator for large-scale raindrop energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2022, 100, 107443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xi, Z.; Du, H.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Dai, S.; Fan, M.; Liu, J.; Su, Q.; Wang, H.; Hu, G.; et al. A ternary-dielectric rolling TENG array for robust ocean energy harvesting and distributed environmental monitoring. Nano Energy 2025, 227, 111318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, W.; Chen, Q.; Ren, Q.; Zhu, C.; Xie, Y.; Li, W. Recent advances in enhancing the output performance of liquid-solid triboelectric nanogenerator (LS-TENG): Mechanisms, materials, and structures. Nano Energy 2024, 131, 110191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, Z.H.; Cheng, G.; Lee, S.; Pradel, K.C.; Wang, Z.L. Harvesting Water Drop Energy by a Sequential Contact-Electrification and Electrostatic-Induction Process. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4690–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Tao, X.; He, H.; Chen, F.; Huang, Z.-X.; Wang, Z.L.; Chen, X.; Qu, J.-P. Fabrication of triboelectric polymer films via repeated rheological forging for ultrahigh surface charge density. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lepikko, S.; Jaques, Y.M.; Junaid, M.; Backholm, M.; Lahtinen, J.; Julin, J.; Jokinen, V.; Sajavaara, T.; Sammalkorpi, M.; Foster, A.S.; et al. Droplet slipperiness despite surface heterogeneity at molecular scale. Nat. Chem. 2024, 16, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vu, D.L.; Le, C.D.; Vo, C.P.; Ahn, K.K. Surface polarity tuning through epitaxial growth on polyvinylidene fluoride membranes for enhanced performance of liquid-solid triboelectric nanogenerator. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 223, 109135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meng, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, R.; Wang, J.; Ge, Y.; Liu, H.; Feng, C.; Zhou, Z.; Meng, Y.; Huang, Z.; et al. Elevating Outputs of Droplet Triboelectric Nanogenerator through Strategic Surface Molecular Engineering. ACS Energy Lett. 2024, 9, 2670–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.; Xie, B.; Long, J.; Kuang, Y.; Chen, X.; Hou, M.; Gao, J.; Zhou, S.; Fan, B.; He, Y.; et al. Interfacial Laser-Induced Graphene Enabling High-Performance Liquid-Solid Triboelectric Nanogenerator. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2104290.1–2104290.9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dai, T.; Ran, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, T.; Hu, J.-Y.; Du, M.; Zhou, E. Fluorine Substitution of Dithienocoronene Diimide (DTCDI)-Based Molecules to Improve Ambipolar Performance of OFETs. Dye. Pigment. 2026, 248, 113559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, W.; Zheng, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, C.; Song, Y.; Deng, X.; Leung, M.; Yang, Z.; Xu, R.X.; et al. A droplet-based electricity generator with high instantaneous power density. Nature 2020, 578, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, H.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, K.; Wu, Z.; Ding, Z.; Yang, Y.; Li, J. Fabrication of Tubular Electricity Nanogenerator with High Power Density by Bulk Effect. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2424446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Sun, N.; Liu, J.; Wen, Z.; Sun, X.; Lee, S.-T.; Sun, B. Integrating a Silicon Solar Cell with a Triboelectric Nanogenerator via a Mutual Electrode for Harvesting Energy from Sunlight and Raindrops. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2893–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, X.J.; Zhang, L.Q.; Feng, Y.G.; Hu, H.Y.; Wang, X.W.; Zheng, Y.B.; Wang, N.N.; Zhang, C.Y.; Yu, Q.L.; Zhou, F.; et al. Mechanism and control of triboelectrification on oil-solid interface and self-powered early-warning sensor in petroleum industry. Nano Energy 2022, 104, 107930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rodrigues, C.; Kumar, M.; Proenca, M.P.; Gutierrez, J.; Melo, R.; Pereira, A.; Ventura, J. Triboelectric energy harvesting in harsh conditions: Temperature and pressure effects in methane and crude oil environments. Nano Energy 2020, 72, 104682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vijayan, V.M.; Tucker, B.S.; Hwang, P.T.J.; Bobba, P.S.; Jun, H.-W.; Catledge, S.A.; Vohra, Y.K.; Thomas, V. Non-equilibrium organosilane plasma polymerization for modulating the surface of PTFE towards potential blood contact applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 2814–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tankov, I.; Yankova, R.; Kolev, H. Spectroscopic (FT–IR, Raman, UV–Vis, XPS) features for the organic ion pair pyridinium hydrogen squarate: Experimental and theoretical evaluation. J. Mol. Struct. 2025, 1352, 144467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.; Li, R.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.L.; Wei, D. Triboiontronics with temporal control of electrical double layer formation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bian, Q.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wu, L.; Li, W. Unveiling the dynamic behavior of low-velocity droplet impinging on hydrophilic solid wall under electrostatic field. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2025, 169, 109894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, J.; Wang, D.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y.; Chen, B.; Wang, Z.L.; Pan, J.; Larsson, R.; Shi, Y. Real-Time and Online Lubricating Oil Condition Monitoring Enabled by Triboelectric Nanogenerator. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 11869–11879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiao, S.; Wu, H.; Deng, H.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J.; Li, Y. Tubular Oil–Solid Triboelectric Nanogenerator Adopted for Self-Powered Impurities Monitoring of Insulating Oil Flow. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026, 36, e12466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the fabrication process of fluorinated PDMS films. (b) Schematic diagram of the molecular chains of the fluorosilanes. (cg) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the surfaces of the five PDMS films. (hl) Schematic diagrams illustrating the surface roughness profiles of the five PDMS films.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the fabrication process of fluorinated PDMS films. (b) Schematic diagram of the molecular chains of the fluorosilanes. (cg) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the surfaces of the five PDMS films. (hl) Schematic diagrams illustrating the surface roughness profiles of the five PDMS films.
Energies 19 01694 g001
Figure 2. (ah) XPS characterization of the five PDMS films. (i) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the five PDMS films.
Figure 2. (ah) XPS characterization of the five PDMS films. (i) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the five PDMS films.
Energies 19 01694 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of the charge transfer measurement system. (b) Electric double layer (EDL) model at the dielectric surface. (c) Charge transfer quantity of the five PDMS films at different inclination angles. (d) Voltage output of the five PDMS films at different inclination angles. (e) Charge transfer quantity of the three different morphologies of 13F-PDMS after surface modification. (f) Charge transfer quantity of the three 13F-PDMS morphologies in a 1.69 mol/L FeCl3 aqueous solution. (g) Charge transfer quantity of the three 13F-PDMS morphologies in a saturated NaCl aqueous solution. (h) Schematic diagram of Na+ ion adsorption at the solid–liquid interface. (i) Charge transfer quantity of the three 13F-PDMS morphologies in aqueous solutions with different pH values. (j) Schematic diagrams of the solid–liquid interface at pH = 2 (i), pH = 7 (ii), and pH = 12 (iii).
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of the charge transfer measurement system. (b) Electric double layer (EDL) model at the dielectric surface. (c) Charge transfer quantity of the five PDMS films at different inclination angles. (d) Voltage output of the five PDMS films at different inclination angles. (e) Charge transfer quantity of the three different morphologies of 13F-PDMS after surface modification. (f) Charge transfer quantity of the three 13F-PDMS morphologies in a 1.69 mol/L FeCl3 aqueous solution. (g) Charge transfer quantity of the three 13F-PDMS morphologies in a saturated NaCl aqueous solution. (h) Schematic diagram of Na+ ion adsorption at the solid–liquid interface. (i) Charge transfer quantity of the three 13F-PDMS morphologies in aqueous solutions with different pH values. (j) Schematic diagrams of the solid–liquid interface at pH = 2 (i), pH = 7 (ii), and pH = 12 (iii).
Energies 19 01694 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the TEB-TENG structure. (b) Working mechanism of the TEB-TENG. (c) Output voltage of the TEB-TENG with deionized water volumes varying from 10 mL to 70 mL. (d) Output current with 40 mL of deionized water. (e) Transferred charge with 40 mL of deionized water. (f) Operational schematic of the TEB-TENG with deionized water.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the TEB-TENG structure. (b) Working mechanism of the TEB-TENG. (c) Output voltage of the TEB-TENG with deionized water volumes varying from 10 mL to 70 mL. (d) Output current with 40 mL of deionized water. (e) Transferred charge with 40 mL of deionized water. (f) Operational schematic of the TEB-TENG with deionized water.
Energies 19 01694 g004
Figure 5. (a) Output voltage of four TEB-TENGs connected in series. (b) Output current of four TEB-TENGs connected in series. (c) Transferred charge of four TEB-TENGs connected in series. (d) Operational schematic of the four TEB-TENGs. (e) Output current and voltage of the four TEB-TENGs under different load resistances. (f) Schematic diagram of 150 LED bulbs being powered by the four TEB-TENGs.
Figure 5. (a) Output voltage of four TEB-TENGs connected in series. (b) Output current of four TEB-TENGs connected in series. (c) Transferred charge of four TEB-TENGs connected in series. (d) Operational schematic of the four TEB-TENGs. (e) Output current and voltage of the four TEB-TENGs under different load resistances. (f) Schematic diagram of 150 LED bulbs being powered by the four TEB-TENGs.
Energies 19 01694 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Gong, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, J.; Li, M.; Xiao, W. Tube-Shaped Solid–Liquid Beam-Pumping Energy Harvester Based on Self-Assembled Materials. Energies 2026, 19, 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071694

AMA Style

Li S, Gong Z, Liu M, Wang J, Li M, Xiao W. Tube-Shaped Solid–Liquid Beam-Pumping Energy Harvester Based on Self-Assembled Materials. Energies. 2026; 19(7):1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071694

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shuyao, Zujian Gong, Mei Liu, Jingrui Wang, Minghui Li, and Wanying Xiao. 2026. "Tube-Shaped Solid–Liquid Beam-Pumping Energy Harvester Based on Self-Assembled Materials" Energies 19, no. 7: 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071694

APA Style

Li, S., Gong, Z., Liu, M., Wang, J., Li, M., & Xiao, W. (2026). Tube-Shaped Solid–Liquid Beam-Pumping Energy Harvester Based on Self-Assembled Materials. Energies, 19(7), 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071694

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop