Feasibility Study on Direct Co-Firing of Typical Biomass Types in Coal-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Experimental Materials
2.2. Experimental Systems and Methods
2.3. Experimental Procedure and Background Conditions
2.4. Analysis and Test Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Movement and Combustion Characteristics
3.2. Movement and Combustion Process
3.3. K and Cl Migration
3.3.1. K and Cl in Biomass Fuels
3.3.2. K and Cl Migration Process
4. Conclusions
- Densified wood pellets release all volatiles and break down into char particles similar in size to coal char within approximately 50 s, primarily in the dense phase and transition zones. Their movement patterns, structural strength, and volatile release rates closely resemble those of coal particles, indicating that densified wood pellets pose a minimal segregation risk in industrial coal-fired CFB boilers and warrant further industrial application.
- Due to their low density, corn straw undergoes significant segregation. They reach the dilute-phase zone within about 10 s of entering the furnace, even before complete devolatilization. Moreover, their volatile release rate is twice that of densified wood pellets. Wheat straw, on the other hand, suffers from poor mechanical strength, causing it to break into fragments immediately within about 1.5 s and ascend rapidly, with a volatile release rate ten times that of densified wood pellets. These movement and combustion characteristics indicate that corn and wheat straw exhibit a high segregation risk when co-fired in industrial coal-fired CFB boilers. In industrial practice, at low blending ratios (e.g., 5% on a thermal basis), such challenges may remain operationally manageable. However, at elevated co-firing ratios, compression treatment becomes necessary to enhance their structural integrity and density in order to mitigate segregation risk.
- Strict quality control is essential when co-firing densified wood pellets. Although their inherent potassium and chlorine contents are low, precautions must be taken to avoid chlorine contamination from sources such as recycled wood products so as to reduce the risk of low-temperature acid dew point corrosion and toxic gas emissions resulting from chlorine release. In contrast, at elevated co-firing ratios involving corn straw and wheat straw, proactive measures must be implemented to address the risks of high-temperature KCl corrosion, HCl dew point corrosion, ash deposition and slagging, as well as bed material agglomeration.
- Future research should further investigate the relationship between the densification process (compression level and energy consumption) and the co-firing feasibility (key indicators such as mechanical strength, density, thermal conductivity, and internal mass transport characteristics) in industrial coal-fired CFB boilers. This would help maximize the economic feasibility of the co-firing process while ensuring its practical applicability. Such efforts will also contribute to the large-scale utilization of light straw-type biomass resources in industrial coal-fired CFB boilers.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CFB | Circulating Fluidized Bed |
| XRD | X-ray Diffraction |
| SEM-DES | Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Detector |
References
- Huang, J.; Liao, Y.; Lin, J.; Dou, C.; Huang, Z.; Yu, X.; Yu, Z.; Chen, C.; Ma, X. Numerical simulation of the co-firing of pulverized coal and eucalyptus wood in a 1000MWth opposed wall-fired boiler. Energy 2024, 298, 131306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Cao, J.; Lei, L.; Cao, Y.; Liu, D. Pilot-tests of the coal-fired power plant indirect coupling with multi-source organic solid waste incineration technology. Fuel 2024, 369, 131740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, S.; Jin, Y.; Wang, M.; Feng, H.; Yin, J. Influence of papermaking biomass co-firing on operation energy efficiency and gas emission stability of a coal-fired thermal power plant: A case study. Energy 2025, 327, 136484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ke, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Lyu, J.; Zhou, T. Development of biomass-fired circulating fluidized bed boiler with high steam parameters based on theoretical analysis and industrial practices. J. Energy Inst. 2022, 105, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Yu, C. Experimental study on co-firing of coal and biomass in industrial-scale circulating fluidized bed boilers. Energies 2025, 18, 3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, H.-P.; Chang, Y.-H.; Chien, W.-C.; Lee, H.-T.; Huang, C.C. Emissions during co-firing of RDF-5 with bituminous coal, paper sludge and waste tires in a commercial circulating fluidized bed co-generation boiler. Fuel 2008, 87, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Teng, Y.; Zhang, K. Migration behaviors of As, Se and Pb in ultra-low-emission coal-fired units and effect of co-firing sewage sludge in CFB boilers. Energies 2022, 15, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topal, H.; Taner, T.; Naqvi, S.A.H.; Altınsoy, Y.; Amirabedin, E.; Ozkaymak, M. Exergy analysis of a circulating fluidized bed power plant co-firing with olive pits: A case study of power plant in Turkey. Energy 2017, 140, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cahyo, N.; Sulistiyowati, D.; Rahmanta, M.A.; Felani, M.I.; Soleh, M.; Paryanto, P.; Prismantoko, A.; Hariana, H. A techno-economic and environmental analysis of co-firing implementation using coal and wood bark blend at circulating fluidized bed boiler. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev. 2024, 13, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhoi, P.R.; Sarkar, S. The co-firing of pine biomass and waste coal in 100 and 600 MW power plants: A sustainable approach to reduce GHG emissions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atimtay, A.T.; Kayahan, U.; Unlu, A.; Engin, B.; Varol, M.; Olgun, H.; Atakul, H. Co-firing of pine chips with Turkish lignites in 750kWth circulating fluidized bed combustion system. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Y.R.; Shi, W.; Xie, G.H. Implications of wheat straw logistic systems for bioenergy sustainable development in China: Costs, energy consumption, and GHG emissions. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 837, 155633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wang, R.; Li, H.; Nie, Y.; Song, X.; Li, M.; Shi, M.; Zheng, X.; Cai, W.; Wang, C. Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment. Appl. Energy 2021, 285, 116494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koul, B.; Yakoob, M.; Shah, M.P. Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environ. Res. 2022, 206, 112285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W.; Fang, Y.R.; Chang, Y.; Xie, G.H. Toward sustainable utilization of crop straw: Greenhouse gas emissions and their reduction potential from 1950 to 2021 in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Liu, D.; Li, S.; Kong, R. Combustion performance and ash compositions during biomass/semi-coke blended fuel oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed combustion. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 3522–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, P.; Hui, S.E.; Gao, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Tan, H.; Zhao, Q.; Xu, T. Experimental investigation on the combustion and heat transfer characteristics of wide size biomass co-firing in 0.2 MW circulating fluidized bed. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 52, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iannello, S.; Bond, Z.; Sebastiani, A.; Errigo, M.; Materazzi, M. Axial segregation behaviour of a reacting biomass particle in fluidized bed reactors: Experimental results and model validation. Fuel 2023, 338, 127234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salatino, P.; Solimene, R. Mixing and segregation in fluidized bed thermochemical conversion of biomass. Powder Technol. 2017, 316, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Hu, Z.; Wang, G.; Luo, X.; Ruan, R.; Jin, Q.; Tan, H. Influence of coal co-firing on the particulate matter formation during pulverized biomass combustion. J. Energy Inst. 2019, 92, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hariana; Ghazidin, H.; Putra, H.P.; Darmawan, A.; Prabowo; Hilmawan, E.; Aziz, M. The effects of additives on deposit formation during co-firing of high-sodium coal with high-potassium and -chlorine biomass. Energy 2023, 271, 127096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, L.; Volpe, M.; Lucian, M.; Fiori, L.; Goldfarb, J.L. Does hydrothermal carbonization as a biomass pretreatment reduce fuel segregation of coal-biomass blends during oxidation? Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 181, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haykiri-Acma, H.; Yaman, S.; Kucukbayrak, S. Does carbonization avoid segregation of biomass and lignite during co-firing? Thermal analysis study. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 137, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwong, K.Y.; Marek, E.J. Combustion of biomass in fluidized beds: A review of key phenomena and future perspectives. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 16303–16334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; Wang, S.; Li, Z. Evaluation of biomass char combustion kinetics using a micro-fluidized bed with thermogravimetry–mass spectrometry. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 14021–14032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.B.; Sharifi, V.N.; Swithenbank, J.; Ma, L.; Darvell, L.I.; Jones, J.M.; Pourkashanian, M.; Williams, A. Combustion of a single particle of biomass. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unchaisri, T.; Fukuda, S. Investigation of ash formation and deposit characteristics in CFB co-combustion of coal with various biomass fuels. J. Energy Inst. 2022, 105, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xia, J.; Vervisch, L.; Wan, K.; He, Y.; Whiddon, R.; Bahai, H.; Cen, K. Measurement and kinetics of elemental and atomic potassium release from a burning biomass pellet. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 2681–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorin, E.; Schmidt, F.M. Wide-field imaging of gas-phase K species in biomass combustion using photofragmentation laser absorption imaging. Fuel 2025, 381, 133429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Liu, H.; Yuan, H.; Zhuang, X.; Yuan, S.; Yin, X.; Wu, C. Release and transformation pathways of various K species during thermal conversion of agricultural straw. Part 1: Devolatilization stage. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 9605–9613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Shen, F.; Dong, Y. Insights into the effects of atmosphere and chlorine on potassium release during biomass combustion: Temporal measurement and kinetic studies. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 12523–12531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolf, C.; Leino, T.J.; Stephan, A.R.; Aho, M.J.; Spliethoff, H. Online corrosion measurements in combination with deposit and aerosol analysis during the co-firing of straw with coal in electrically heated, small-ccale pulverized fuel and circulating fluidized bed systems. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 2506–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balan, G.; Losurdo, M.; Spliethoff, H. Experimental study of high-temperature chlorine-induced corrosion in dependence of gas velocity. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 5628–5639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhote, L.; Pandey, R.A.; Middey, A.; Mandal, N.; Kumar, S. Co-combustion of distillery sludge and coal for application in boiler and subsequent utilization of the generated bottom ash. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 36742–36752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Yu, L.; Qin, C.; Jiang, S.; Yu, C. Feasibility of direct co-firing centimeter-scale straw in pulverized coal boilers: Experimental and modeling study. Chem. Eng. J. 2026, 530, 173617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Duan, L.; Li, L.; Liu, D.; Zhao, C. Movement and mixing behavior of a single biomass particle during combustion in a hot fluidized bed combustor. Powder Technol. 2020, 370, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Fan, B.; Lei, J.; Lei, F.; Xiao, Y. Hydrodynamic investigation on gas–solid two-phase flow character in a circulating fluidized bed. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 9, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yunusa, S.U.; Mensah, E.; Preko, K.; Narra, S.; Saleh, A.; Sanfo, S. A comprehensive review on the technical aspects of biomass briquetting. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2024, 14, 21619–21644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lang, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Lyu, B.; Liang, N. Research on the hot densification mechanism of biomass wastes based on molecular dynamics simulation and components adjustment method. Energy 2024, 294, 130902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellano, J.M.; Gómez, M.; Fernández, M.; Esteban, L.S.; Carrasco, J.E. Study on the effects of raw materials composition and pelletization conditions on the quality and properties of pellets obtained from different woody and non woody biomasses. Fuel 2015, 139, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Dai, G.; Heberlein, S.; Chan, W.P.; Wang, X.; Tan, H.; Lisak, G. Assessing the effect of size and shape factors on the devolatilization of biomass particles by coupling a rapid-solving thermal-thick model. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2024, 183, 106835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pollex, A.; Zeng, T.; Khalsa, J.; Erler, U.; Schmersahl, R.; Schön, C.; Kuptz, D.; Lenz, V.; Nelles, M. Content of potassium and other aerosol forming elements in commercially available wood pellet batches. Fuel 2018, 232, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cândido, W.L.; Carneiro, A.d.C.O.; Vital, B.R.; Demuner, I.F.; Almeida, Ê.W.d.; Silva, C.M.S.d.; Peres, L.C. Chloride leaching of eucalyptus wood particles by water for pellets production. Fuel 2024, 367, 131548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paneru, M.; Babat, S.; Maier, J.; Scheffknecht, G. Role of potassium in deposit formation during wood pellets combustion. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 141, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahim, M.U.; Gao, X.; Garcia-Perez, M.; Li, Y.; Wu, H. Release of chlorine during mallee bark pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.-J.; Li, W.-W.; Jiang, H.; Yu, H.-Q. Fates of chemical elements in biomass during Its pyrolysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6367–6398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagerström, J.; Steinvall, E.; Boström, D.; Boman, C. Alkali transformation during single pellet combustion of soft wood and wheat straw. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 143, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansen, J.M.; Jakobsen, J.G.; Frandsen, F.J.; Glarborg, P. Release of K, Cl, and S during pyrolysis and combustion of high-chlorine biomass. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 4961–4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Z.; Jia, X.; Yun, F.; Zhang, J.; Liu, A.; Song, C. Effect of Coal Gangue Addition on the Migration and Transformation Pattern of K and Cl During Rice Straw Combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2026, 198, 1318–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Ren, S.; Yang, J.; Jiang, D.; Guo, J.; Pu, Y.; Meng, X. Experimental study on K migration, ash fouling/slagging behaviors and CO2 emission during co-combustion of rice straw and coal gangue. Energy 2022, 251, 123950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, X.; Sun, R.; Chi, H.-H.; Meng, X.; Li, Y.; Levendis, Y.A. Hydrogen chloride emissions from combustion of raw and torrefied biomass. Fuel 2017, 200, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatehi, H.; Costa, M.; Bai, X.-S. Numerical study on K/S/Cl release during devolatilization of pulverized biomass at high temperature. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2021, 38, 3909–3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, G.; Yuan, Q. Dynamic migration characteristics of potassium during agricultural waste combustion and the mechanism of combined chlorine–sulfur action. Molecules 2025, 30, 2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Vassilev, S.V.; He, C.; Vassileva, C.G.; Wei, Y. Migration behavior of chlorine and sulfur during gasification and combustion of biomass and coal. Biomass Bioenergy 2024, 182, 107080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Zhong, Z.; Xue, Z.; Xue, J.; Xu, Y. Release and transformation of potassium in co-combustion of coal and wheat straw in a BFB reactor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 144, 1010–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]














| Car (%) | Har (%) | Oar (%) | Nar (%) | Sar (%) | Mar (%) | Aar (%) | Var (%) | FCar (%) | Qnet,ar (J/g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coal | 56.95 | 3.62 | 10.85 | 0.92 | 0.53 | 6.15 | 20.98 | 28.04 | 44.83 | 23,179 |
| Densified wood pellets | 45.15 | 5.24 | 39.05 | 0.14 | 0.69 | 9.35 | 0.38 | 75.08 | 15.19 | 17,776 |
| Corn straw | 41.19 | 4.66 | 38.52 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 11.09 | 3.50 | 67.03 | 18.38 | 16,476 |
| Wheat straw | 40.51 | 4.73 | 35.44 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 12.27 | 5.47 | 65.57 | 16.69 | 14,115 |
| Parameter Name | Unit | Operating Range |
|---|---|---|
| Bed temperature | °C | 850 ± 15 |
| Furnace mid and upper zone temperature | °C | 800–880 |
| Furnace outlet pressure | Pa | −100 ± 50 |
| O2 concentration at tail flue | % | 3–3.5 |
| Coal feed rate | kg/h | 3.5–4 |
| Primary air flow | m3/h | 14–15.5 |
| Primary air temperature | °C | 300 |
| Fuel feeding air flow | m3/h | 2.5 |
| Secondary air flow | m3/h | 7.5–12 |
| Return air flow | L/min | 4 |
| Bed pressure drop | Pa | 1650–2400 |
| Dense-phase fluidization velocity | m/s | 6.4–7.0 |
| Dilute-phase superficial velocity | m/s | 5.0–6.2 |
| Kwater (%) | Kweak acid (%) | Kstrong acid (%) | Kinsoluble (%) | Ktotal (%) | Clwater (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Densified wood pellets | 0.142 | 0.027 | 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.177 | 1.397 |
| Corn straw | 0.930 | 0.601 | 0.014 | 0.101 | 1.645 | 2.520 |
| Wheat straw | 1.508 | 0.307 | 0.03 | 0.046 | 1.891 | 1.832 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zhang, H.; Yu, L.; Jiang, B.; Qin, C.; Jiang, S.; Yu, C. Feasibility Study on Direct Co-Firing of Typical Biomass Types in Coal-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers. Energies 2026, 19, 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19061492
Zhang H, Yu L, Jiang B, Qin C, Jiang S, Yu C. Feasibility Study on Direct Co-Firing of Typical Biomass Types in Coal-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers. Energies. 2026; 19(6):1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19061492
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Haoteng, Lihui Yu, Bingyi Jiang, Cuina Qin, Shuo Jiang, and Chunjiang Yu. 2026. "Feasibility Study on Direct Co-Firing of Typical Biomass Types in Coal-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers" Energies 19, no. 6: 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19061492
APA StyleZhang, H., Yu, L., Jiang, B., Qin, C., Jiang, S., & Yu, C. (2026). Feasibility Study on Direct Co-Firing of Typical Biomass Types in Coal-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers. Energies, 19(6), 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19061492

