Next Article in Journal
Structural Design and Photoelectric Performance of Vertical Sunlight-Tracking Mid-Pane Photovoltaic Louver Window
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrogen Diffusion Behavior of Steel-Wire-Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipes with Stress–Hydrogen Coupled Finite Element Method
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Validation of a Hybrid Switched Inductor and Switched Capacitor Buck–Boost DC–DC Converter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation on Critical Heat Flux of Flow Boiling in Rectangular Microchannels: A Parametric Study and Assessment of New Prediction Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Additively Manufactured Ni–Co Superalloys for Hydrogen Safety Enhancement of Gas-Turbine Energy Systems: Microstructural Degradation and Crack Initiation Mechanisms

by
Alexander I. Balitskii
1,2,*,
Valerii O. Kolesnikov
1,3,
Ljubomyr M. Ivaskevych
1,
Olexiy A. Balitskii
4,
Marcin A. Królikowski
2 and
Jakub M. Dowejko
5
1
Department of Strength of the Materials and Structures in Hydrogen-Containing Environments, Karpenko Physico-Mechanical Institute, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 5 Naukova Str., 79601 Lviv, Ukraine
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 19 Piastow Av., 70-310 Szczecin, Poland
3
Faculty of Technology and Information Systems, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Viktor Novikov Street, 2, 37500 Lubny, Ukraine
4
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue W., Waterloo, ON N2L3G1, Canada
5
Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(14), 3295; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143295
Submission received: 14 May 2026 / Revised: 10 June 2026 / Accepted: 7 July 2026 / Published: 13 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Hydrogen Energy Safety Technology, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

Ni–Co γ/γ′-strengthened superalloys are key structural materials for modern energy and flow turbomachinery systems due to their exceptional high-temperature strength, creep resistance, as well as hydrogen and corrosion stability. However, operation in gaseous hydrogen environments typical of hydrogen-cooled generators, cooled gas-turbine blades, and emerging hydrogen-energy technologies can significantly affect their microstructural stability and fracture behavior. This study presents a comprehensive multiscale review of hydrogen-induced nanoscale degradation and crack initiation mechanisms in Ni–Co superalloys produced by wrought, powder metallurgy, and additive manufacturing routes. Transmission electron microscopy combined with quantitative morphometric analysis was employed to characterize the size, morphology, and spatial distribution of γ′ precipitates, revealing a dense population of coherent particles predominantly in the 40–120 nm range, governed by a log-normal distribution. Correlations between precipitate size, aspect ratio, and circularity indicate the onset of partial loss of coherency and coarsening for particles exceeding ~80 nm, creating favorable sites for hydrogen localization. The presence of TCP phases (η, σ, μ, Laves) and carbides at grain boundaries and within grains was shown to enhance microstructural heterogeneity and act as effective hydrogen traps, promoting interfacial decohesion and microcrack initiation. To support microstructural interpretation, convolutional neural network analysis with Grad-CAM visualization was applied to SEM images, enabling the identification of the structural regions most sensitive to hydrogen-assisted damage, particularly γ/γ′ interfaces and defect clusters. The results demonstrate that hydrogen-induced degradation in Ni–Co superalloys is governed by the coupled interactions among microstructure, hydrogen distribution, and local stress state. The findings provide a physically grounded basis for optimizing alloy chemistry, heat treatment, and additive manufacturing parameters, as well as for developing AI-assisted predictive models for the durability of critical components in hydrogen-energy and high-temperature power-generation systems to increase hydrogen safety.

1. Introduction

Ni–Co superalloys are widely used in power-generation systems, aerospace engineering [1,2,3], and turbomachinery due to their high thermal stability, corrosion resistance [4,5,6], and ability to retain their mechanical properties under long-term loading in high-temperature environments [6,7,8].
However, operation in hydrogen-containing conditions—particularly in hydrogen-cooled turbogenerators [9,10] and gas-turbine engine blades—may lead to hydrogen absorption, which significantly affects the microstructure and durability of these steels and alloys [11,12,13,14]. Studies have demonstrated that hydrogen can penetrate along grain boundaries, induce local stress accumulation, and initiate microcracks, especially in regions with structural heterogeneity [1,15,16,17,18]. This results in reduced fracture toughness, an increased tendency toward brittle failure, and degradation of properties in defect-rich zones. Therefore, understanding the effects of hydrogen charging on fracture toughness, durability, and hardness is crucial for predicting the remaining service life of Ni–Co superalloy components operating in aggressive hydrogen-containing environments.

2. Current State of Heat-Resistant Gas-Turbine Ni–Co Materials

Ni–Co superalloys possess exceptionally high melting temperatures (up to ~90% of Tm), enabling their use in the hot sections of aerospace gas-turbine engines, including turbine blades, working discs, rings, and combustion chambers. Owing to their excellent resistance to creep, corrosion, and oxidation at temperatures above 700 °C, these alloys ensure increased efficiency and long-term durability of high-temperature systems [19,20,21,22]. These properties determine their widespread use as structural materials for manufacturing critical components of thermal power systems, aerospace engines [23,24,25,26], reactor equipment, steam turbine components, heat exchangers, and other technologies, where the combination of thermal stability, strength, and long-term durability is essential [27,28,29]. Based on the production method, superalloys are classified as cast, deformed, powder, and additively manufactured superalloys.
Cast nickel–cobalt superalloys are multiphase alloys strengthened with intemetallics and carbides, designed to provide exceptionally high mechanical strength, thermal stability, and corrosion resistance at temperatures up to ~1000 °C [29,30,31,32]. Their compositions are optimized through controlled ratios of Ni and Co, while the addition of Cr, W, Al, Ti, Nb, and Hf promotes the stabilization of the γ′ phase and the formation of a protective Al2O3 oxide layer [33]. This oxide film significantly enhances high-temperature strength and corrosion resistance [34,35,36]. In particular, the newly developed cast high-chromium Co–Ni-based alloy 9CoNiCr demonstrates the following performance characteristics [33]: a thermally stable γ′ microstructure at 900–1000 °C with significantly slowed γ′-phase coarsening; the formation of a continuous protective Al2O3 layer, providing oxidation resistance comparable to that of advanced Ni-based superalloys such as CMSX-4; a high yield strength and a competitive minimum creep rate at 950 °C. Studies of the Co/Ni ratio in γ′-strengthened alloys (ERBOCo-1/1X) have demonstrated that an optimized elemental balance provides superior high-temperature strength, driven by modifications in γ′ morphology and reduced dislocation energy [34,37]. Cast Ni–Co–Cr–W–Mo systems stabilize the γ′ phase and topologically close-packed (TCP) phases in accordance with service conditions, which has been confirmed through detailed investigations of phase composition and TCP clustering behavior [35]. Ultimately, optimized cast superalloys exhibit exceptional high-temperature strength, long-term operational capability under severe thermal loads, and enhanced oxidation and corrosion resistance, making them well suited for aerospace turbine components, power-generation units, and nuclear systems [36,37].
Wrought (cast/forged) Ni–Co superalloys containing balanced proportions of Ni and Co exhibit improved mechanical performance, including high yield strength, impact toughness, and enhanced creep resistance even at temperatures up to ~950 °C. Plastic de-formation processes—such as forging or cold rolling—produce fine-grained structures, high dislocation densities, and nanoscale γ′ precipitates; these features strengthen the alloy by increasing the yield strength (up to ≈1400 MPa at 923 K) and suppressing grain growth during service-related heating [38].
Studies of cold-rolled and annealed Ni–25Co–Al–Ti–Cr–Mo–W alloys revealed a trimodal γ/γ′ microstructure with nano-dispersed γ′ lattices and hundreds of nanotwins, resulting in exceptional strength even at 1023 K (1086 MPa) [38]. Hot-compression experiments demonstrated that refined grain formation and the development of subgrain-scale nanograins through micro-twinning significantly modify the deformation mechanisms within the strain range of 0.1–1.0, thereby optimizing the strength–ductility balance [39,40].
The Co/Ni ratio is critical for stabilizing the γ′ phase and improving creep resistance at 900 °C (as shown in single-phase single-crystal studies), demonstrating the key role of the balance between the principal alloying elements in forming a thermally stable microstructure under prolonged high-temperature exposure [41,42,43,44]. Such wrought Ni–Co alloys are widely employed in aerospace turbines, power-generation systems, and other applications where ultrahigh strength, structural stability, and resistance to deformation at elevated temperatures are essential [45,46,47,48].
Powder metallurgy, like casting, allows products of a specified shape to be produced without significant mechanical processing, and deformation [49,50,51,52]. After hot isostatic pressing, the parts are free of liquation [53], micropores and structural heterogeneity [54,55,56]. They have a fine-grained microstructure with many refractory elements and a uniform distribution of strengthening phases. This structure ensures phase stability, high short-term, long-term, and fatigue strength over a wide temperature range (up to 1100 °C), durability, and crack resistance, particularly in gaseous hydrogen [57].
Selective laser melting (SLM) and directed energy deposition (DED) methods are used for additive manufacturing of nickel-based alloys [58,59,60,61]. The prospects and economic efficiency of additive manufacturing for producing complex parts for the energy, aerospace, and automotive industries are demonstrated. The structures formed during powder melting processes have been analyzed, and γ, γ′, γ″, TCP phases, carbides, nitrides, oxides, and borides have been identified, depending on their composition [58]. To reduce microstructural heterogeneity, a method of continuous laser forming with in situ heat treatment (IHT) has been developed for homogenization of AM DD98 m samples [62]. A comprehensive review of in situ alloying technology in laser additive manufacturing has revealed the key advantages of this method, namely flexibility in the selection of chemical composition and reduced production costs, as well as significant problems such as chemical heterogeneity, unmelted particles, and structural defects [63,64]. This study emphasizes the need for precise control of laser melting parameters and post-processing conditions to ensure a homogeneous microstructure and stable mechanical properties.
Regardless of the production technology, the microstructure features of heat-resistant Ni–Co superalloys determine their operational characteristics [65,66,67,68]. It has been established that the quantity, type, size, and morphology of intermetallic and carbides determine the functional characteristics of modifications of the Inconel 718 nickel alloy with different chemical compositions and production technologies (casting, wrought metallurgy, powder metallurgy, and additive manufacturing), temperature, homogenization duration, and aging [69,70,71,72]. The heat resistance of alloys depends on structural heterogeneity [53,54,55,56], the strength of interatomic bonds in a solid solution [65,67], the type, quantity, dispersion, morphology, distribution, and thermal stability of strengthening phases [65,66,67], grain size and grain boundary condition [52,53,67], diffusion process parameters, content of modifying elements and harmful impurities [52,53,67].
One of the key features of Ni–Co superalloys is the dependence of the morphology and distribution of the γ′ phase on the Ni/Co ratio. At high Ni content, γ′ precipitates tend to adopt a spherical morphology, whereas at higher Co content, they become cubic [57,68]. This behavior is attributed to changes in the γ/γ′ lattice mismatch caused by the distribution of W between the phases, which also affects the creep behavior at 900 °C. According to [57], increasing the Co content from 13% to 35% leads to a reduction in the average grain size (from ~26 μm to ~18 μm), as well as an increase in the size of the “nano-phase” precipitates (from ~80 to ~230 nm). A comprehensive analysis of the distribution of the γ′ phase, carbides, and the σ phase was developed, which is essential for understanding variations in mechanical strength and high-temperature stability. In multicomponent Ni–Co alloys, MC carbides, M2B borides, and potentially the σ phase are often found along grain boundaries. EBSD–EDS analysis has shown that in Co/Ni superalloys these phases form due to local enrichment in W and Mo. Their presence influences grain-boundary properties and the overall stability of the microstructure [68]. Alloying up to 2 at.% Re in the Co–30Ni–10Al–5Mo–2Nb superalloy changes the morphology of γ′ from cuboidal to rounded cuboidal due to a decrease in the crystal lattice mismatch (from ~+0.32% to ~+0.19%) [69]. This modification also increases the stability of the γ/γ′ interface during prolonged annealing at 900 °C. All the structural features mentioned above and their evolution during operation affect the sensitivity of nickel–cobalt alloys to hydrogen-containing environments [71,72,73,74].
Therefore, the aim of the work is to investigate the mechanisms of hydrogen-induced nanoscale degradation and crack initiation in γ/γ′-strengthened Ni–Co superalloys by establishing the relationship between structural components, precipitate morphology, and hydrogen localization, using modern microscopy methods and AI-assisted image analysis to contribute to enhancing the hydrogen safety of modern energy systems.

3. Materials and Methods for Investigation

3.1. Investigated Alloys

Ni–Co heat-resistant superalloys of the Ni56Cr14Co15Mo5Al3Ti3 (EP-741NP) type are used for manufacturing discs of modern gas-turbine engines (GTEs) and gas-turbine units (GTUs) for land- and marine-based applications, including systems operating on alternative fuels. This study examined the influence of hydrogen on the properties of the heat-resistant nickel-based powder superalloy Ni51Cr9Mo3W6Nb2AlTi (KhN51KVMTYB) (EP-741P) and the wrought vacuum-induction-melted superalloy Ni62Cr14Mo5Nb3AlTi (KhN62BMKTYu) (EP-742) (Firth Rixson Metals Ltd., Glossop, UK), whose chemical compositions and mechanical properties are presented in [1].

3.2. Microscopy Imaging

Microstructural examinations were performed using a Hitachi SU-70 field-emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with secondary-electron (SE) and backscattered-electron (BSE) detectors. Imaging was conducted at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV, a working distance of 5.4 mm, and in TE mode.
Thin foils for the microstructural examination of the Ni–Co superalloy were pre-pared according to standard transmission electron microscopy specimen preparation procedures. Samples were first sectioned from the working zone of the alloy and mechanically ground to a thickness of ~80–100 μm. Final thinning was performed by electropolishing in a two-jet electrolyte holder at low temperature (–20 to –30 °C) until an electron-transparent region (“hole with a rim”) was obtained. In selected cases, Ar+ ion milling was used for final surface cleaning to remove the mechanically damaged layer. TEM foils were mechanically ground to approximately 100 μm, punched into 3 mm discs and twin-jet electropolished in a solution of 10 vol.% perchloric acid and 90 vol.% ethanol at −30 °C until perforation occurred. Specimens for cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (using HR-TEM-Fei Techai G2 F20 S Twin, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) were prepared using a standard TEM sample preparation approach, including cutting, grinding, and dimpling. Ar ion milling was carried out at a voltage of 4.0 kV with an angle of 6°, followed by a final low-voltage ion-milling of 2.5 kV with an angle of 2° as a final step. The electron-transparent regions adjacent to the perforation were used for TEM examinations. Fractographic investigations were performed using an EVO-40XVP electron microscope (Carl Zeiss SMT AG, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an INCA Energy 350 microanalysis system (Oxford Instruments Plc, Abingdon, UK). The microstructure was investigated by Zeiss Stemi 2000-C Stereo Microscopes (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and SIGETA industrial color digital camera (UCMOS 1300, 1.3 MP and SIGETA International Color Digital Camera MCMOS 5100 5.1 MP) (SIGETA, Hong Kong, China). The image size of all TEM micrographs recorded on a CCD camera was kept at 2004 pixel × 1335 pixel. The exposure time for the HRTEM images was set to 1.0 s. The aberration coefficients were set to be sufficiently small for obtaining the HRTEM images under slightly over-focus conditions (close to Scherzer defocus). The strain field in CrN/AlN multilayer was calculated on the CS-corrected HRTEM (JEOL 2100F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and STEM images (FEI Titan Themis 60-300 X-FEG S/TEM instrument operated at 300 kV, equipped with a probe corrector for spherical aberration, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) by geometric phase analysis (GPA) method.
Observations were carried out using a transmission electron microscope in bright-field (BF), dark-field (DF), and selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) modes. The accelerating voltage was set to 200–300 kV, providing sufficient penetration and contrast for examining γ/γ′ phases, dislocation structures, and hydrogen-induced nanopores. Images were captured using a high-resolution digital camera. All focusing parameters, apertures, and objective-lens settings were optimized to minimize artifacts and ensure maximal clarity in the regions exhibiting local degradation.
To improve the accuracy of the analysis, the images were additionally processed using standard TEM procedures, including contrast adjustment, noise reduction, and scale calibration. SAED patterns were employed to refine the phase composition and determine the orientation relationships of the γ/γ′ phases. All TEM data were correlated with the results of SEM analysis and microhardness measurements to obtain an integrated assessment of hydrogen-induced degradation in the material.

3.3. Statistical Processing of Microstructural Parameters

The statistical analysis of the morphometric parameters of γ′ precipitates in the Ni–Co superalloy was performed using TEM micrographs (200 nm scale) acquired in standard bright-field mode. Initial image processing was conducted in the ImageJ 1.53k/Fiji environment using built-in modules such as Thresholding, Analyze Particles, and filters based on area and shape. Prior to segmentation, the images were converted to 8 bit format, and either the automatic Otsu threshold or a manually adjusted threshold was applied to isolate the γ′ phase as dark regions against the γ-matrix background.
After binarization, morphological cleaning of the mask (de-speckle, remove outliers, binary opening) was performed to minimize the influence of noise and artifacts.
Particles larger than 10 nm were selected for further analysis, excluding partially cut objects located at the image boundaries. For each precipitate, the equivalent diameter, area, perimeter, circularity (4πA/P2), and aspect ratio (major/minor axes) were determined. The complete set of morphometric data was exported in .csv format and analyzed in Python 3.12.6 using the NumPy 2.1.1, SciPy 1.14.1, Matplotlib 3.9.2, and Pandas libraries 2.2.3.
The particle-size distribution was approximated using log-normal and gamma models, for which the parameters μ, σ, shape k, and scale θ were determined. Quantitative descriptors included the mean value, D50 (the median), D10, and D90, the standard deviation, the geometric mean, and the variance. Additionally, correlations between particle size and aspect ratio, as well as the circularity–size relationship, were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient r. To assess spatial homogeneity, a nearest-neighbor distance (NND) distribution was constructed.
A total of ≈300 γ′ precipitates were analyzed for the statistical dataset, ensuring statistically representative results. The obtained morphometric characteristics were used to assess the growth behavior of the γ′ phase, the degree of coalescence, and the evolution of the microstructure.

3.4. Grad-CAM Heatmap Construction

The implementation of the research methodology was based on earlier studies [73,74]. To interpret the behavior of the convolutional neural network and identify the microstructural regions that most strongly influence the model’s decision, the Gradi-unweighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) method was applied. SEM images were first normalized, resized to match the model input dimensions, and fed into the CNN. The activation tensors of the last convolutional layer and the corresponding gradients of the model output with respect to these activations were then extracted and stored.
The importance weights were calculated by globally averaging the gradients, after which a weighted sum of the activation maps was constructed. A ReLU function was ap-plied to the resulting map to retain only the positive contributions that increase the probability of the target class. The final Grad-CAM heatmap was interpolated to match the size of the original SEM image and overlaid on it as a semi-transparent color layer.
The resulting heatmaps make it possible to identify local microstructural features (pores, γ′ precipitates, γ/γ′ heterogeneities, defective zones) that the model considers most informative. This provides a visually interpretable explanation of the CNN’s decision-making process and enhances the reliability of automated microstructure analysis in Ni–Co superalloys. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have significantly expanded the capabilities of microstructural characterization in materials science. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been successfully applied to scanning and transmission electron microscopy images for automated phase identification, defect detection, microstructure classification, and prediction of mechanical properties. In studies of hydrogen-related degradation, AI-assisted image analysis enables the extraction of complex microstructural information that may be difficult to quantify using conventional approaches. Furthermore, explainable AI methods, such as gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM), provide visual interpretation of the regions that most strongly influence model predictions, thereby increasing the transparency and reliability of deep learning-based materials diagnostics. Therefore, the application of CNN-based and Grad-CAM techniques represents a promising approach for the analysis of microstructural evolution and hydrogen-induced damage in Ni–Co superalloys.

3.5. Hydrogen Charging of the Ni–Co Super Alloys

A set of research instruments for studying the influence of hydrogen and hydrogen-containing gases on the properties of structural materials has been developed [1,2,3]. The purity of the hydrogen atmosphere has a significant effect on the degree of hydrogen embrittlement in structural metallic materials [75,76,77,78]. Therefore, the technical-grade hydrogen was additionally purified and dried, and all tests in gaseous hydrogen were carried out according to the following procedure [79,80,81,82]:
The testing chamber was evacuated to 0.13 Pa after placing the specimens inside.
The chamber was then filled with hydrogen, purged, and evacuated again.
Hydrogen was subsequently introduced to the required pressure, and the tests were performed.
After this procedure, the hydrogen volume fraction in the chamber reached 99.9997%, the oxygen volume fraction did not exceed 0.00007%, and the mass concentration of water vapor was 0.0009 g/m3. The hydrogen content was determined by the vacuum-fusion method using a LECO TCH 600 analyzer [83], and the measurement results are reported in [1].

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Microstructural Examination and Analysis of the Ni–Co Superalloys

The microstructure of the Ni–Co superalloys was examined (Figure 1a). The image reveals a fine-dispersed phase structure with dark, rounded contrast features—typical of γ′ precipitates (Ni3(Al, Ti)) embedded in the γ matrix (a Ni–Co–Cr solid solution). The observed contrast is most likely caused by differences in chemical composition or coherency stresses between the γ and γ′ phases.
The main structural constituents are as follows: dark particles with diameters of 10–50 nm, corresponding to coherent γ′ precipitates oriented according to the cubic lattice of the γ matrix; bright regions corresponding to the γ matrix (a solid solution of Ni, Co, Cr with W, Mo, Al, and Ti); occasional linear contrasts (a vertical trace on the right and a crack or sub-boundary on the left)—likely representing deformation bands or subgrain boundaries. Local clusters of precipitates, indicating possible aging heterogeneity or partial γ′-phase coarsening. Such a microstructure is characteristic of thermally strengthened superalloys, such as the Inconel series and EP742 alloys, or Ni–Co–Cr–Mo–Ti–Al systems after aging at 700–800 °C [81,82,83,84]. The high density of fine precipitates provides dislocation strengthening and enhances creep resistance. The histogram shown in Figure 2 illustrates the particle-size distribution (in nanometers). Most precipitates fall within the 40–120 nm range, which is typical of secondary γ′ phases in nickel-based superalloys such as Inconel 718 or EP-742. A smaller number of larger particles (up to 300 nm) indicates aggregation or partial γ′-phase coarsening during aging. The pink curve represents the fitted normal distribution. Most inclusions are concentrated in the 60–100 nm range, which is characteristic of secondary γ′-phase particles in Ni–Co-based superalloys. A statistical analysis of this type of alloy is presented in [69,85].
Table 1 and Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 present and visualize the further statistical analysis of the structural constituents—γ′-phase precipitates. The microstructure provides an effective strengthening mechanism by impeding dislocation motion through fine γ′ precipitates. This indicates a high potential of the materials for application in turbomachinery components operating at elevated temperatures.
The histogram in Figure 4a shows that most precipitates have an aspect ratio (ma-jor/minor) in the range of 1.3–1.7, indicating a morphology close to spherical. Only a small fraction of the particles are elongated (aspect ratio > 2). This reflects the predominance of coherent and uniform γ′-phase growth, which is characteristic of nickel-based superalloys after optimal heat treatment. Figure 4b shows a statistical distribution with a maximum in the 50–80 nm range, confirming the high density of γ′ precipitates and the effectiveness of their dispersion strengthening through dislocation-motion hindrance. A long tail is observed on the right side of the histogram, which may be associated with local aging heterogeneity.
The log-normal fitting results (Figure 5a) confirm the classical nucleation and growth mechanism of the γ′ phase, without any explosive (abnormal) particle coarsening. This is consistent with the precipitation behavior typical of Ti/Al-strengthened Ni–Co superalloys.
The CDF curve (Figure 5b) shows that:
  • ~50% of the particles have D < 80 nm;
  • ~90% have D < 120 nm.
Thus, the secondary γ′ phases dominate, and their morphology remains stable under conditions typical of high-temperature turbine operation.
Microstructural classes and morphology. Box-plot classification by size classes is presented in Table 2.
A negative correlation between diameter and circularity was also identified (Figure 6b), indicating particle deformation during coarsening and their transition toward a less coherent state, which may reduce creep resistance under long-term loading.
The pole figures (Figure 7a,b) show that the γ′-phase precipitates exhibit a certain texture orientation relative to the γ matrix. This is associated with the cubic coherency of the γ/γ′ phases, typical of additive manufacturing, where a preferred growth direction exists along the build axis. Importantly, the smaller precipitates (<80 nm) exhibit more random orientations, indicating earlier nucleation and lower sensitivity to the matrix textured [7,86,87,88].
The observed characteristics of the γ/γ′ microstructure are not only important for high-temperature strengthening but also directly influence hydrogen transport and trapping behavior. γ′ precipitates, γ/γ′ interfaces, and local microstructural heterogeneities may act as reversible or irreversible hydrogen trapping sites, affecting hydrogen distribution, stress localization, and the susceptibility of the alloy to hydrogen-assisted crack initiation. Therefore, the quantitative characterization of precipitate morphology and distribution provides an essential basis for understanding hydrogen-induced degradation mechanisms in Ni–Co superalloys.

4.2. Grad-CAM Heatmap Construction for the Ni–Co Superalloy Microstructure

Based on the SEM image of the Ni–Co γ/γ′ superalloy microstructure (Figure 1a) and the methodology described in Section 3.4, a gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) activation map was constructed and superimposed on the microstructure of the alloy (Figure 8). The resulting heatmap visualizes the spatial distribution of microstructural regions that have the greatest influence on the decision-making process of the convolutional neural network during microstructure classification and analysis.
Regions with high activation intensity (red and yellow areas) are predominantly localized in zones of increased microstructural heterogeneity, particularly near γ/γ′ phase interfaces, local clusters of precipitates, pore-like features, and defect-rich regions. In contrast, areas characterized by a relatively homogeneous γ matrix with a uniform distribution of fine γ′ precipitates exhibit low activation levels (blue and green regions).
The scale indicates the relative contribution of different microstructural regions to the neural network’s decision, where low activation values correspond to blue regions and high activation values correspond to red regions.
This distribution indicates that the neural network identifies as most informative those microstructural features that are potentially associated with stress concentration, localization of plastic deformation, and hydrogen accumulation. Importantly, the Grad-CAM activation correlates well with regions where TEM-based morphometric analysis revealed γ′ precipitate coarsening (>80 nm), partial loss of coherency, and an increased density of defects.
The obtained Grad-CAM results demonstrate that AI-assisted microstructural interpretation methods are capable of effectively identifying local regions prone to hydrogen-assisted degradation in Ni–Co γ/γ′ superalloys. The pronounced activation of the neural network in the vicinity of γ/γ′ interfaces, TCP phases, and defect clusters confirms their key role as effective hydrogen traps and preferential sites for microcrack initiation.
Thus, Grad-CAM not only enhances the interpretability of machine-learning-based analysis but also provides a physically meaningful link between digital diagnostics and the classical hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms (HELP/HEDE). This approach opens new opportunities for the early identification of degraded zones, optimization of heat-treatment strategies, and lifetime prediction of critical components in energy systems, including those manufactured using additive manufacturing technologies (AMTs). The application of ATM can help resolve overheating problems and enable the development of new blade repair technologies.
The regions highlighted by the Grad-CAM analysis correspond to microstructural features that are frequently reported as preferential sites for hydrogen accumulation and damage evolution. The concentration of neural-network activation near γ/γ′ interfaces, coarsened precipitates, pores, and defect clusters suggests that these locations may play a critical role in the initiation of hydrogen-assisted microcracks.

4.3. Relationship Between Microstructure and Hydrogen-Induced Degradation Mechanisms in Ni–Co Superalloys

The microstructure of Ni–Co superalloys predominantly consists of a γ matrix with a high density of coherent γ′ precipitates (spheres, cubes, aligned cubes, plates, short plates, doublets of short plates, octets of cubes, large plates, rafts, etc.). Intermetallic phases such as the η phase and the σ phase are also present in the structure. The main types of carbides in cast cobalt-based superalloys—MC, M23C6, M7C3, and M6C—are typically found both along grain boundaries and within the grains [89,90,91,92].
The heat treatment generally recommended for nickel-based superalloys is primarily intended to achieve a high-volume fraction and an improved size distribution of γ′ pre-capitates, which provide optimal resistance to stress-induced rupture. In cast alloys with a high-volume fraction of γ/γ′ eutectic, complete dissolution of the γ′ phase through appropriate solution treatment is critically important [93,94,95,96].
The high melting temperature of nickel-based superalloys often allows refinement of the γ′ microstructure by solution heat treatment followed by one or more aging stages [88]. The η phase is an intermetallic phase with an approximate composition of Ni3(Ti, Nb) and crystallizes in a hexagonal metastable structure (DO44). (The DO44 structure—also written as D024 or D024—is a structural type of intermetallic compound with a hexagonal mesoscale arrangement.)
It forms at high temperatures (approximately 750–900 °C), particularly during long-term aging or service exposure. In Ni–Cr–Co superalloys, at elevated Ti/Al ratios (>0.8) and temperatures around ~850 °C, the η phase precipitates after ~1000 h—more rapidly at higher Ti/Al ratios and temperatures [89]. A limited presence of the η phase can aid in controlling grain structure during forging (e.g., in A286 and IN706) by restricting grain growth [91]. The η phase may reduce the steady-state creep rate in Nimonic 263 [92]. An excessive amount of the η phase displaces the γ′ strengthening phase, reducing tensile strength and impairing the balance of creep resistance at prolonged high temperatures. It also decreases room-temperature ductility and serves as a source of crack initiation along grain boundaries [93]. The η phase is a hexagonal Ni3(Ti, Nb) structure that forms at high temperatures in Ni–Co alloys. In moderate amounts, it may positively influence structural control or creep resistance; however, when present in excessive quantities, it de-grades mechanical properties—reducing strength and ductility and accelerating crack propagation. The σ phase (sigma phase) is a brittle topologically close-packed (TCP) intermetallic phase that forms in Ni–Co and other superalloys.
It possesses a tetragonal crystal structure (space group P42/mnm) and is composed primarily of Cr, Co, Mo, W, Nb, and related elements [94]. Crystallography: the structure is tetragonal, space group P42/mnm, and the unit cell contains approximately 30 atoms occupying five nonequivalent positions. It was formed during prolonged aging or at high temperatures (>750 °C), especially in the presence of Co, Ni, Nb, and Al. Its presence has been confirmed in many HEA and Ni-based systems [94]. The effects of the σ phase include depletion of strengthening elements from the γ/γ′ phases, embrittlement, reduced ductility, and decreased resistance to long-term load-induced failure or corrosion [95]. In the case of a Ni-based superalloy containing 13% and 35% Co, it has been shown that a higher Co content promotes the formation of the σ phase alongside γ′ precipitates and carbides [95].
The stability of carbides at high temperatures is critical for the long-term performance of superalloys. Primary MC carbides are considered the most thermally stable; they remain solid even near the solidus temperatures of the alloy. In cobalt-based superalloys, the MC phase (e.g., NbC or TaC) serves as the primary strengthening constituent that per-sists at service temperatures of ~900–1000 °C and above [96]. Carbide phases in superalloys can exhibit different morphologies depending on their formation conditions. Primary MC carbides that form during solidification often possess coarse blocky or dendritic mor-apologies (the so-called “Chinese-script” carbides) and are typically located in the inter-dendritic regions of the cast structure [97]. Secondary M23C6 carbides, which precipitate in the solid state, typically exhibit a finer, more dispersed morphology—appearing as individual particles or thin films along grain or sub-grain boundaries. For example, in the René 108 alloy, nanoscale M23C layers with thicknesses of 5–15 nm were observed along the edges of primary carbides after aging [97]. Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the general appearance of the microstructure of the Ni–Co alloys, illustrating the morphology of their structural constituents.
In addition to the η and σ phases, other intermetallic phases and carbides may also be present in Ni–Co superalloys [98,99].
In Figure 11, a conceptual consolidated scheme of the Ni–Co superalloy microstructure—before and after hydrogen charging—is presented. The main purpose of this scheme is to summarize the accumulated material to enable its further analysis and in-perpetration. A hydrogen-containing environment or hydrogen ingress may cause hydrogen embrittlement (HE) in superalloys—a reduction in ductility and strength resulting from the interaction of hydrogen with the microstructure. In Ni–Co superalloys, as in other high-strength alloys, hydrogen can accumulate at defects (dislocations, grain boundaries, and phase particles) and promote premature crack initiation and growth (Table 3).
Carbides play a dual role in this process: on the one hand, they may act as traps for hydrogen atoms, reducing their mobility; on the other hand, they may serve as stress concentrators and preferential crack-propagation paths, particularly when hydrogen accumulates at the carbide–matrix interface [124,125,126,127]. Carbides often settle at grain boundaries [128,129,130,131], further contributing to brittle intergranular fracture under the action of hydrogen [132,133,134,135]. The interaction of carbides and other structural constituents with hydrogen therefore warrants special attention.
Despite the rapid development of casting, powder metallurgy, and 3D-printing technologies, as well as high hardness, thermal stability, and dispersion strengthening of Ni–Co superalloys, mechanical processing remains necessary during the final formation of the geometry of components, particularly in the manufacture of turbine blades and connecting elements, as well as during the repair and restoration of units that have undergone wear or deformation after long-term operation at high temperatures [136,137,138,139].
Hydrogen, entering the material either because of lubricating [140,141,142,143] and cooling fluids [144,145,146,147], or if necessary [148,149,150,151], repair work on equipment operated in a hydrogen-containing environment [152,153,154,155], significantly affects the machinability of steels and alloys [156,157,158,159]. Stress concentrations near intermetallic [160,161,162,163], carbides [164,165,166,167], and non-metallic inclusions [168,169,170,171] cause local accumulation of hydrogen and changes in the mechanisms of fracture during turning [172,173,174,175] and wear [4,176,177]. Novel hybrid additive manufacturing enables effective hydrogen trapping by producing layered structures similar to those found in two-dimensional anisotropic single crystals [169], where hydrogen becomes localized within the Wan der Vaalse gaps, forming layer-by-layer barriers that impede hydrogen diffusion into the base material [168,169]. These phenomena have a common nature of aging from the perspective of the first physical principle (hydrogen with high parameters or the influence of high energy γ-irradiation on cast iron, steels, alloys, and chalcogenides in amorphous or single-crystal states) [172,173,174,178].

4.4. Additive Manufacturing and 3D-Printing Technologies for Energy Applications

At present, 3D printing [179,180,181,182] and related additive manufacturing [183,184,185,186] technologies are experiencing rapid and widespread implementation [187,188,189,190,191], supported by a strong technological background established through advances achieved in previous decades [192,193,194].
Ni–Co alloys are being extensively studied for processing by the selective laser melting (SLM) and directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing routes [195,196,197,198].
In addition, a few studies have focused on the thermomechanical deformation mechanisms and high-temperature performance of these alloys in turbine disk prototype components [62,198,199,200].
The study by [201] demonstrated the feasibility of fabricating a γ/γ′-strengthened Co–Ni–Al–W superalloy by laser melting of a mixture of elemental powders, resulting in the formation of a high volume fraction of the γ′ phase after appropriate heat treatment.
In study [97], the formation of a γ/γ′-strengthened Co–Ni–Al–W superalloy additionally alloyed with Cr and Ti and produced by laser melting of elemental powder mixtures, was investigated. It was shown that the addition of Cr and Ti increases the volume fraction of the γ′ phase and enhances the oxidation resistance after heat treatment. At the same time, the incorporation of these elements reduces the γ/γ′ lattice misfit, which leads to a decrease in creep resistance, a critical factor for high-temperature applications.
Mosallanejad et al. [66] provided a comprehensive review of in situ alloying in laser-based additive manufacturing processes, highlighting its potential for producing novel metallic alloys directly from elemental powder mixtures without prior powder atomization. The study underlined the necessity of precise control of laser processing parameters and appropriate post-processing heat treatments to achieve a uniform microstructure and stable mechanical properties.
The prospects for the application of 3D-printing technologies (LPBF/SLM, EBM, DED/WAAM) for Ni–Co superalloys in the energy sector are primarily associated with a transition from ‘geometry-driven printing’ toward the controlled design of hierarchical microstructures and phase compositions (γ/γ′/carbides/TCP phases) tailored to specific high-temperature regimes and hydrogen-containing environments. Additive manufacturing enables local optimization of composition and properties (graded regions, topology optimization, internal cooling channels, repair and refurbishment of worn components); however, it also exacerbates the classical challenges of superalloys processed by AM, including hot cracking, porosity, anisotropy, residual stresses, and sensitivity to heat-treatment schedules. This necessitates an integrated process–structure–property approach and the development of standardized methodologies for defect control and micro-structural qualification [202].
For components operating in hydrogen-energy systems, a key issue is the integration of AM-based microstructural design with hydrogen resistance. Recent results indicate that realistic ‘hydrogen’ exposure scenarios (e.g., direct interaction with hydrogen flames) can lead to significant hydrogen uptake and non-trivial effects of oxide scales, while high-pressure H2 environments are capable of drastically altering the fracture mechanisms of Ni-based superalloys [11,203].
Therefore, the most promising strategy appears to be a combined approach comprising (I) printing designed for γ′ strengthening under controlled thermal cycling; (II) post-processing (HIP followed by aging) to close residual porosity and relieve internal stresses; (III) application of barrier/diffusion coatings and control of oxide scale formation; and (IV) qualification testing under relevant hydrogen environments. Taken together, these measures can accelerate the implementation of AM Ni–Co superalloys in turbomachinery, combustor components, and elements of hydrogen infrastructure.

4.5. Optimal Modern Chemical Composition of 3D-Printed Ni-Based Superalloys for High-Temperature Applications in Energy and Aviation

Various advanced Ni-containing steels [204,205,206,207] and superalloys [208,209,210,211], such as CM247LC [212,213,214,215], Hastelloy X [216,217,218,219], IN718, IN625, IN738, IN738LC [220,221,222,223], IN939, SRR99 [224,225,226,227], Haynes282, AD730 [228,229], ABD-900AM, ABD-850AM [230,231,232,233], and CMSX-4 [234,235], have been successfully produced using AM techniques [220,234,235]. Inconel 718 (UNS N07718) is one of the most widely used alloys for AM (selective laser melting, DED). This alloy is strengthened by precipitation of the γ′/γ″ phases (Ni3(Al, Ti, Nb)), which provide high-temperature strength and resistance to hydrogen embrittlement. Inconel 625 (UNS N06625) is used for components requiring strength at high temperatures combined with high corrosion resistance. In contrast to Inconel 718, Inconel 625 is strengthened primarily by solid-solution strengthening due to the Nb/Mo relations. Haynes® 282 was developed for 3D-printing technology and exhibits the best heat-resistance characteristics and weldability.
Inconel 718 (UNS N07718)—suitable materials for AM, selective laser melting, DED, etc. Typical chemical composition: Ni: 50–55%; Cr: 17–21%; Fe: balance; Nb + Ta: 4.75–5.50%; Mo: 2.80–3.30%; Ti: 0.65–1.15%; Al: 0.20–0.80%; Co: up to 1%; Mn, Si: ≤0.35%; C: ≤0.08%; B, P, S: ≤0.01%. This alloy is strengthened by precipitation of the γ′/γ″ phase (Ni3(Al, Ti, Nb)) and exhibits high heat resistance and creep resistance at high temperatures. Inconel 625 (UNS N06625) is also a suitable material for AM due to its high heat resistance and resistance to high-temperature corrosion. Typical chemical composition (mas. %): Ni: ≈58%; Cr: 20–23%; Mo: 8–10%; Nb + Ta: 3.15–4.15%; Fe: ≈5%; Co, Mn, Si, Al, Ti: ≤0.01%; C: ≈0.1%. Not strengthened in the same manner as 718 alloy; the primary strengthening procedure is solid-solution strengthening by Nb/Mo.
Haynes® 282 is more suitable for 3D printing with the best characteristics of heat resistance and weldability. Cr: oxidation-resistant; Co, Mo, Al, Ti, and Nb: strengthening elements. Haynes 282 (N07208) belongs to the Ni-Cr-Co type of alloy, which consists of Mo and W (9–11%), Nb (4–5%), Al (2.5–3.5%), Ti (1.5–2.5%), Cr (19–21%), Co (8–10%), Fe (up to 1%), C and B—for high strength at high temperatures, thermal stability and weldability for application in gas turbines. Typical chemical composition (mas. %): Ni: balance (~51–55%); Cr: 19.0–21.0%; Co: 8.0–10.0%; Mo: 9.0–10.0%; W: 9.0–10.0%; Nb: 4.0–4.5%; Al: 2.5–3.5%; Ti: 1.5–2.5%; C: 0.05–0.08%; B: 0.005–0.01%; Fe: ≤1.0%; Mn: ≤0.5%; Si: ≤0.5%; Cu: ≤0.1%; P: ≤0.015%; S: ≤0.010%. The roles of main alloying elements: Cr: corrosion resistance and strengthening; Co, Mo, W: strengthening at high temperatures, increasing of heat resistance; Nb, Al, Ti: as a component of γ′ gamma prime phase; C, B: has improved graine boundary strength and stability. This composition has made the Haynes 282 suitable for badges production, combusting chamber and other high temperatures components applications in aerospace and energetics. The main differences between Inconel 718 and Haynes 282: Inconel 718 typically exhibits higher low-temperature strength and better room-temperature mechanical properties; while Haynes 282 provides temperature strength and creep resistance, making it more suitable for applications above 650 degrees C (1200 degrees F). Haynes 282 also provides better weldability and machinability, but its higher strain rate sensitivity and higher cost (due to higher cobalt and molybdenum content) can make it more difficult to machine.
For medium- and high-temperature structural components that require excellent long-term creep resistance, thermal stability above approximately 650 degrees C (1200 degrees F), and good weldability, Haynes 282 is generally the best choice. For applications that require extremely high room temperature, temperature and medium-temperature yield/strength, wide availability of various forging forms and many years of experience in the oil and gas and aerospace industries, Inconel 718 remains the preferred choice. Ultimately, the selection of the appropriate alloy depends on the operating temperature, the required creep time, the manufacturing process (intensive welding or forging) and cost and supply constraints.
Haynes 282 (UNS N07208) and Inconel 718 (UNS N07718) are nickel-based superalloys designed specifically for high-temperature applications, but their designs meet different performance requirements. Haynes 282 is a phase-strengthened wrought superalloy designed to balance high creep resistance at high temperatures with good weldability and machinability. It is suitable for components with hot gas passage, advanced steam and supercritical carbon dioxide (s-CO2) cycles, and other applications requiring long creep life at temperatures above 650 degrees. Inconel 718 is a nickel-chromium-iron dispersion alloy (primary hardener: γ″ Ni3Nb phase) that exhibits excellent strength from low temperatures to approximately 650 degrees. Its combination of machinability, high yield/aging strength, and mature supply chain has led to its widespread use in the aerospace, oil and gas, and tooling industries. Inconel 718 appears to be more difficult to process in energetic flow machine than Haynes 282, mainly due to its higher strength and greater strain rate sensitivity. Inconel 718 has corrosion resistance is dependent on the environment; it performs better than Haynes 282 in some alkaline environments, but is more susceptible to corrosion in acidic environments (e.g., HCl). Haynes 282 provides better corrosion resistance than Inconel 718 in some acidic environments due to the formation of a denser passivating film. Alloys CM-247/RR1000/MAR-M247 are also used for heat resistance enhancement, especially in turbine blades and other hot areas of engines. Typical chemical composition: Ni: >50–60%; Cr: 12–16%; Co: 8–12%; Mo, W, Ta, Re (for hardening at high temperatures); Al + Ti: ~6–8% for γ′-precipitation (example of high-performance superalloys adapted for AM). γI-strengthening Ni-based superalloys such as IN718, IN738LC [95,97], DZ125L [98], and Rene 104 [99] are also used during metal AM processes.
Powder characteristics: AM uses gas-dynamically or plasma-sprayed powders with a strictly controlled composition that match the composition of the corresponding alloy grades. Impurity control: even minor impurities (O, N) in powders can seriously increase defect formation and affect the mechanical properties of parts, especially for Inconel 718-based alloys. Composition and microstructure analysis: Additively manufactured products may have an uneven distribution of alloying elements due to the rapid solidification and thermal cycling of the process, requiring further heat treatment to optimize properties.
Inconel 718 (Ni, Cr, Nb, Mo, Ti, Al)—γ′/γ″ precipitation; high strength up to ~700 °C Inconel 625 (Ni, Cr, Mo, Nb)—strength + corrosion resistance Haynes 282/analogue (Ni, Cr, Co, Mo, Al, and Ti) better weldability and AM properties CM-247/RR1000 etc. (Ni, Cr, Co, Mo, W, Ta, Re, Al, and Ti) very high heat resistance for turbine blades.
EP-741P, available only in powder form, and VZHL-14, available both in powder and cast forms, were compared with forged EP-915, which has a similar composition (it is an analogue of EP-666). 741 alloys are stronger but more sensitive to HE. In AM, the manufacturing process and subsequent HT are important. Inconel 625 (UNS N06625) is used for components which need strength at high temperatures combined with high corrosion resistance. In contrast to Inconel 718, its primary strengthening mechanism is solid-solution strengthening due to Nb/Mo relations. Haynes 282 has been specially created for 3D-printing technology and exhibits the best heat-resistance characteristics and weldability.

5. Conclusions

  • A comprehensive multiscale analysis of hydrogen-induced nanoscale degradation and crack initiation in γ/γ′-strengthened Ni–Co superalloys, which are promising materials for energy and turbomachinery applications, was carried out. According to the results of transmission electron microscopy and quantitative morphometry, a dense and homogeneous distribution of coherent γ′ precipitates with characteristic sizes in the range of 40–120 nm, which are described by the log law and have a predominantly spherical shape, was established.
  • Statistical analysis revealed a correlation between particle size, aspect ratio, and roundness, indicating a partial loss of coherence and the onset of coagulation for γ′ precipitates larger than ~80 nm. The presence of TCP phases (η, σ, μ, Laves) and various types of carbides at grain boundaries and within grains increases microstructural heterogeneity and creates highly efficient hydrogen traps, promoting decohesion at interfacial boundaries and microcrack initiation.
  • The application of the Grad-CAM method to SEM images allowed us to visualize the microstructural regions most sensitive to hydrogen-assisted damage and to emphasize the decisive role of γ/γ′ interfaces, TCP phases, and defect clusters in crack initiation.
  • It is established that hydrogen-induced degradation in Ni–Co γ/γ′ superalloys is determined by the interconnected system “microstructure–hydrogen–stress state”, in which the morphology of nanoscale precipitates, intermetallic phases, and defects caused by additive manufacturing control hydrogen capture, the localization of plastic deformation, and the transition from micro-void formation to microcrack growth. The results obtained create a physically sound basis for optimizing the chemical composition, heat treatment regimes, and 3D-printing parameters, as well as for developing digital and AI-oriented models for predicting the lifetime of critical components of hydrogen-cooled generators and gas hydrogen turbines.
  • Additive manufacturing technologies (LPBF/SLM, EBM, DED/WAAM) show strong potential for producing and repairing Ni–Co superalloy components for energy applications, including turbine disks, combustor parts, and elements of hydrogen infrastructure. AM processing introduces specific challenges such as hot cracking, residual porosity, chemical inhomogeneity, anisotropy, and residual stresses, which require optimized alloy design, processing parameters, and post-treatments to support predictive models for the durability of critical components in hydrogen-energy and high-temperature power-generation systems with increased hydrogen safety.
  • For hydrogen-energy systems, the integration of AM-based microstructural design with hydrogen resistance is critical, since recent studies have demonstrated significant hydrogen uptake, complex roles of oxide scales, and changes in fracture mechanisms in Ni-based superalloys under hydrogen flames and high-pressure H2. An integrated strategy combining γ′-oriented printing, HIP and aging, and the use of diffusion-barrier coatings with controlled oxide layers appears to be the most promising route to ensure long-term durability.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN, Poland) and the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NANU, Ukraine) for partial support within the framework of the joint Polish–Ukrainian project entitled “Evaluation of operational changes of nanostructure and materials properties in “green” hydrogen systems” for the period 2025–2027 under the agreement on scientific cooperation between PAN and NANU.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Nomenclature and Abbreviations

AMadditive manufacturing
GTEsgas-turbine engines
GTUsgas-turbine units
LCLlubricating cooling liquids
CHhydrogen concentration
ppmparts per millions
TAturbo aggregate (turbine + turbogenerator)
HCTGhydrogen-cooled turbogenerator
SLMselective laser melting
°Cdegree Celsius
TEMtransmission electron microscopy
BD build direction
CDFcumulative distribution function
APSatmospheric plasma spraying
DEDdirected energy deposition
EBMelectron beam melting
EBSDelectron backscatter diffraction
EP-741Pnickel-based superalloy, powder variant
EP-742nickel-based superalloy, deformable variant
GTTgas-turbine technology
HAZheat affected zone
HEhydrogen embrittlement
HEAhigh-entropy alloy
HEDEhydrogen-enhanced decohesion
HELPhydrogen-enhanced localized plasticity
HESIVhydrogen-enhanced strain-induced vacancy
HIPhot isostatic pressing
H2hydrogen
HVVickers hardness
IoTInternet of Things
ISOInternational Organization for Standardization
KICfracture toughness
Kththreshold stress intensity factor
LCLlubricating cooling liquids
LPBFlaser powder bed fusion
MCmetal carbide
MQLminimum quantity lubrication
SEMscanning electron microscopy
SLMselective laser melting
TEMtransmission electron microscopy
TCPtopologically close-packed phases
TCHtotal combustion hydrogen analyzer (LECO)
γgamma-matrix phase
γ′gamma-prime strengthening phase (Ni3(Al, Ti, Co))
ηeta phase (Ni3(Ti, Nb))
σsigma phase (Cr, Mo, W rich TCP phase)
AIartificial intelligence

References

  1. Balitskii, A.I.; Syrotyuk, A.M.; Ivaskevich, L.M.; Balitskii, O.A.; Kochmanski, P.; Kolesnikov, V.O. Hydrogen accelerated nanopore nucleation, crack initiation and propagation in the Ni–Co superalloys. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 82, 320–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Balitskii, A.I.; Kvasnytska, Y.H.; Ivaskevych, L.M.; Kvasnytska, K.H.; Balitskii, O.A.; Miskiewicz, R.M.; Noha, V.O.; Parkhomchuk, Z.V.; Veis, V.I.; Dowejko, J.M. Improvement of hydrogen-resistant gas turbine engine blades: Single-crystal superalloy manufacturing technology. Materials 2024, 17, 4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Balitskii, A.I.; Kvasnytska, Y.H.; Ivaskevych, L.M.; Kvasnytska, K.H.; Balitskii, O.A.; Shalevska, I.A.; Shynskii, O.Y.; Ja-worski, J.M.; Dowejko, J.M. Hydrogen and corrosion resistance of nickel superalloys for gas turbines, engines cooled blades. Energies 2023, 16, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, W.-T.; Zhou, J.-C.; Ruan, J.-J.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, L.-L. Effects of process parameters on defect for-mation in laser additive manufacturing of a novel Ni-based superalloy. Materials 2025, 18, 3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Galpin, S.J. A review of microstructure phenomena during manufacture of polycrystalline Ni-based superalloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 38, 1315–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Balitskii, A.I.; Ivaskevich, L.M. Hydrogen effect on cumulation of failure, mechanical properties, and fracture toughness of Ni-Cr alloys. Adv. Mat. Sci. Eng. 2019, 2019, 3680253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Balitskii, A.; Krohmalny, O.; Ripey, I. Hydrogen cooling of turbogenerators and the problem of rotor retaining ring materials degradation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2000, 25, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mostafaei, A.; Ghiaasiaan, R.; Ho, I.-T.; Strayer, S.; Chang, K.-C.; Shamsaei, N.; Shao, S.; Paul, S.; Yeh, A.-C.; Tin, S.; et al. Additive manufacturing of nickel-based superalloys: A state-of-the-art review on process–structure–defect–property relationship. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023, 136, 101108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Balitskii, A.I.; Ivaskevich, L.M.; Balitskii, O.A. Rotor steels crack resistance and fracture behavior for hydrogen targeted materials ever-widening database. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2022, 260, 108168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murray, S.P.; Pusch, K.M.; Polonsky, A.T.; Adamek, E.A.; Ladani, L.; Taylor, D.; Pollock, T.M. A defect-resistant Co–Ni superalloy for 3D printing. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Schulz, P.; Dziedzic, D.; Rocha, N.; Ezenwajiaku, C.; Talibi, M.; Balachandran, R.; Galindo-Nava, E. Hydrogen uptake and embrittlement in nickel-base superalloys during hydrogen flame charging. Commun. Mater. 2025, 6, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stefan, E.; Talic, B.; Larring, Y.; Gruber, A.; Peters, T.A. Materials challenges in hydrogen-fuelled gas turbines. Int. Mater. Rev. 2022, 67, 461–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ivanyts’kyi, Y.L.; Hembara, O.V.; Chepil’, O.Y. Determination of the durability of elements of power-generating equipment with regard for the influence of working media. Mater. Sci. 2015, 51, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ivanyts’Kyi, Y.L.; Kun’, P.S.; Shtayura, S.T.; Mochul’s’kyi, V.M. Theoretical-experimental approach to the analysis of fatigue crack propagation in hydrogenated materials. Mater. Sci. 2010, 46, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kobayashi, N.; Koyama, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Hojo, T.; Akiyama, E. Hydrogen embrittlement behavior of pure Ni and Ni–20Cr alloy with different grain sizes. Mater. Trans. 2022, 63, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mai, H.L.; Cui, X.-Y.; Scheiber, D.; Romaner, L.; Ringer, S.P. An Understanding of hydrogen embrittlement in nickel grain boundaries from first principles. Mater. Des. 2021, 212, 110283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Behvar, A.; Haghshenas, M.; Djukic, M. Hydrogen embrittlement and hydrogen induced crack initiation in additively manufactured metals: A critical review on mechanical and cyclic loading. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 58, 1214–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krella, A. Hydrogen-induced degradation of metallic materials—A Short Review. Materials 2025, 18, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Calabokis, O.P.; de la Rosa, N.Y.E.; Ballesteros-Ballesteros, V.; González, G.E.A. Nitriding treatments in nickel–chromium-based superalloy INCONEL 718: A review. Coatings 2024, 14, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, A.N.; Swain, S.K.; Meena, A.; Islam, M.; Nam, K.-W. Advances in corrosion of high-temperature materials: Interfacial migration and alloy design strategies. Ceramics 2024, 7, 1928–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Badea, T.-A.; Dombrovschi, M. The Influence of alloying elements on the hot corrosion behavior of nickel-based superalloys. Materials 2025, 18, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Smetankina, N.; Morhun, S. Numerical analysis of the modern marine gas turbine rotor stress-strain state. In Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering–2023; Nechyporuk, M., Pavlikov, V., Krytskyi, D., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; Volume 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fatriansyah, J.F.; Ajiputro, D.I.; Pradana, A.F.; Kaban, R.S.P.; Federico, A.; Anis, M.; Priadi, D.; Gascoin, N. Physical property prediction of high-temperature nickel and iron–nickel superalloys using direct and inverse composition machine learning models. Metals 2025, 15, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barwinska, I.; Kopec, M.; Kukla, D.; Senderowski, C.; Kowalewski, Z.L. Thermal barrier coatings for high-temperature performance of Nickel-based superalloys: A synthetic review. Coatings 2023, 13, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bu, H.; Chen, L.; Duan, Y. Effect of solution heat treatment on the porosity growth of nickel-based P/M superalloys. Metals 2022, 12, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, P.; Yi, C.; Chen, G.; Qin, H.; Wang, C. Constitutive model based on dynamic recrystallization behavior during thermal deformation of a Nickel-based superalloy. Metals 2016, 6, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Glotka, O.A. Distribution of alloying elements in carbides of refractory nickel alloys under the conditions of equiaxial crystallization. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Glotka, O.; Byelikov, S.; Lysytsya, O. Modeling of carbide formation in alloy of the Ni-Cr-Co-W-Mo-Al-Ti-C system. Acta Metall. Slovaca 2024, 30, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szwajka, K.; Zielińska-Szwajka, J.; Trzepieciński, T. Microstructure and mechanical properties of solid-state rotary friction welded Inconel 713C and 32CrMo4 steel joints used in a turbocharger rotor. Materials 2023, 16, 2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Glotka, A.A.; Moroz, A.N. Comparison of the effects of carbides and nonmetallic inclusions on formation of fatigue microcracks in steels. Metal Sci. Heat Treat. 2019, 61, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Greshta, V.L.; Glotka, O.A.; Obnosov, K.V.; Sotnikov, D.E. Effect of alloying on the phase composition of nickel-based superalloys. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2025, 70, 721–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Glotka, A.A.; Ol’shanetskii, V.Y. Mathematical prediction of the properties of heat-resistant nickel alloys after directional crystallization. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cormier, J. Ni- and Co-based superalloys and their coatings. Metals 2018, 8, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, Y.; Sun, W.; Dai, W.; Hu, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W. Experimental and numerical modeling of the stress rupture behavior of nickel-based single crystal superalloys subject to multi-row film cooling holes. Metals 2017, 7, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Glotka, A.A.; Haiduk, S.V.; Ol’shanetskii, V.Y. Modeling thermophysical characteristics of nickel-based superalloys. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 2021, 94, 1363–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Glotka, A.A.; Ol’shanetskii, V.E. Prediction thermo-physical characteristics of heat-resistant nickel alloys directional crystallization. Acta Metall. Slovaca 2021, 27, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Parsa, A.B.; Ramsperger, M.; Kostka, A.; Somsen, C.; Körner, C.; Eggeler, G. Transmission electron microscopy of a CMSX-4 Ni-based superalloy produced by selective electron beam melting. Metals 2016, 6, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, X.; Zou, M.; Lu, S.; Li, L.; Zhuang, X.; Feng, Q. A novel high Cr CoNi based superalloy with superior high temperature microstructural stability, oxidation resistance and mechanical properties. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2024, 31, 1373–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zenk, C.H.; Volz, N.; Zenk, C.; Felfer, P.J.; Neumeier, S. Impact of the Co/Ni-ratio on microstructure, thermophysical properties and creep performance of multi-component γ′-strengthened superalloys. Crystals 2020, 10, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bao, H.S.; Gong, Z.H.; Chen, Z.Z.; Wang, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.S. Evolution of precipitates in Ni–Co–Cr–W–Mo superalloys with different tungsten contents. Rare Met. 2020, 39, 716–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Weisenburger, A.; Zimmermann, M.; Dafferner, B.; Heinzel, A.; Kelm, S.; Müller, G.; Möslang, A. Development and properties of Ni-based alloys for high-temperature applications in advanced energy systems. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xiao, Z.; He, J.; Gu, J.; Gan, B.; Song, M. Microstructure and mechanical properties of a new Ni–Co-based superalloy at intermediate temperatures. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 29, 2620–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Dong, J.; Guo, C.; Yu, H.; Wang, Q. Mechanical property and deformation mechanisms of a novel Ni–Co–based wrought superalloy via a solution–rolling–aging treatment. Preprints 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, H.; Guo, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z. Refining micron-sized grains to nanoscale in Ni-Co based superalloy by quasistatical compressive deformation at high temperature. Coatings 2023, 13, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Volz, N.; Zenk, C.H.; Karpstein, N.; Lenz, M.; Spiecker, E.; Göken, M.; Neumeier, S. Creep properties and deformation mechanisms of single-crystalline γ′- strengthened superalloys in dependence of the Co/Ni ratio. Philos. Mag. 2021, 102, 718–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bai, Y.; Zhang, R.; Cui, C.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, X. In-situ observation of Ni-Co based wrought superalloy high-temperature deformation: Lattice rotation and grain boundary response. Mater. Res. Lett. 2024, 12, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Quan, Q.; Sun, S.; Sheng, N.; Deng, J.; Hou, G.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, X. Effect of Mo on the microstructures and mechanical properties of the polycrystalline superalloy with high W content. Materials 2022, 15, 7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tai, W.; Zhang, R.; Cui, C.; Zhou, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, X. Solidification segregation behavior and homogenization process of a difficult-to-deform superalloy used at 850 °C. Crystals 2023, 13, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, D.; Ding, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Zhou, D.; Wei, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Z.; Bei, H. Microstructure, mechanical properties and thermal stability of Ni-based single crystal superalloys with low specific weight. Crystals 2023, 13, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Akca, E.; Gürsel, A. A Review of superalloys and IN718 nickel-based Inconel superalloy. Period. Eng. Nat. Sci. (PEN) 2015, 3, 15–27. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Review-on-Superalloys-and-IN718-Nickel-Based-Akca-G%C3%BCrsel/e8b749b9e1e9429f88f9cb067dd5019f6ee3105c?p2df (accessed on 14 May 2026). [CrossRef]
  51. Unnikrishnan, U.; Yang, V. A review of cooling technologies for high temperature rotating components in gas turbine. Propuls. Power Res. 2022, 11, 293–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Behera, A.; Sahoo, A.K.; Mahapatra, S.S. Application of Ni-based superalloy in aero turbine blade: A review. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pollock, T.M.; Tin, S. Nickel-based superalloys for advanced turbine engines: Chemistry, microstructure and proper-ties. J. Propuls. Power 2006, 22, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, C.; Teng, J.; Yang, B.; Ye, X.; Liu, J.; Li, Y. Correlation between microstructure and mechanical properties of novel Co-Ni-based powder metallurgy superalloy. Mater. Charact. 2021, 181, 111480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guédou, J.-Y.; Augustins-Lecallier, I.; Nazé, L.; Caron, P.; Locq, D. Development of a new fatigue and creep resistant PM nickel-base superalloy for disk applications. Superalloys 2008, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xiong, J.; Yin, C.; Wang, C.; Feng, G.; Guo, J. The effect of long-term aging on the microstructure and properties of a novel nickel-based powder superalloy FGH4113A. Materials 2024, 17, 4175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhao, Y.; Li, K.; Gargani, M.; Xiong, W. Application of hot isostatic pressing in nickel-based single crystal superalloys. Crystals 2022, 12, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ajay, P.; Dabhade, V.V. Heat treatments of Inconel 718 nickel-based superalloy: A Review. Met. Mater. Int. 2025, 31, 1204–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Selvaraj, S.K.; Sundaramali, G.; Dev, S.J.; Swathish, R.S.; Karthikeyan, R.; Vijay Vishaal, K.E.; Paramasivam, V. Recent advancements in the field of Ni based superalloys. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 9723450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tkachev, V.I.; Levina, I.M.; Ivas’kevych, L.M. Distinctive features of hydrogen degradation of heat-resistance alloys based on nickel. Mater. Sci. 1997, 33, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Haines, M.P.; Rielli, V.V.; Primig, S.; Haghdadi, N. Powder bed additive manufacturing of Ni based superalloys: A review of the main microstructural constituents and characterization techniques. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 14135–14187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ouyang, X.; Liu, F.; Huang, L.; Ye, L.; Dong, H.; Tan, L.; Wang, L.; Jin, X.; Liu, Y. The effects of Co on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ni-based superalloys prepared via selective laser melting. Materials 2023, 16, 2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Adam, B.M.; Langan, S.M.; Michelson, A.A.; Te, A.; Ahsan, M.R.U.; Tewksbury, G.; Birt, A.; Champagne, V. Microstruc-tural evaluation of a dissimilar metal interface of Ni Co based superalloys fabricated using wire arc directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. JOM 2024, 76, 4802–4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ghoussoub, J.N.; Tang, Y.T.; Dick-Cleland, W.J.B.; Németh, A.A.N.; Gong, Y.; McCartney, D.G.; Cocks, A.C.F.; Reed, R.C. On the influence of alloy composition on the additive manufacturability of Ni-based superalloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2022, 53, 962–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yang, C.; Tang, H.; Li, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Shi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, C. Mitigating microstructural heterogeneity in la-ser directed energy deposition Ni based superalloys by heat accumulation in situ heat treatment. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2025, 20, e2509614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mosallanejad, M.H.; Niroumand, B.; Aversa, A.; Saboori, A. In-situ alloying in laser-based additive manufacturing processes: A critical review. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 872, 159567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lv, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Shi, Y.; Deng, W.; Tian, Y.; Ju, Y.; Yu, H. Investigating the anisotropic behavior and high-temperature mechanical properties of GH4251 nickel-based superalloy prepared by selective laser melting and post heat treatment. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1010, 177951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gudivada, G.; Pandey, A.K. Recent developments in nickel-based superalloys for gas turbine applications: Review. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 963, 171128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Boittin, G.; Locq, D.; Rafray, A.; Caron, P.; Kanouté, P.; Gallerneau, F.; Cailletaud, G. Influence of γ′ precipitate size and distribution on LCF behavior of a PM disk superalloy. Superalloys 2012, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Luo, L.; Di, L.; Fu, H.; Yang, Y.; Qian, X.; He, Z.; Li, Y.; Luo, F. Influence mechanism of γ’ phase dissolution on micro-structural characteristics and creep properties of Ni-based single-crystal superalloys at 1200 C. J. Mater. Engin. Perform. 2025, 34, 16510–16522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhao, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, J.; Lu, H.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y.; Pang, D.; Xie, L.; Li, A.; Wang, L. Effect of the Ni/Co ratio on the structural and initial oxidation properties of NiCo-based superalloys revealed by in situ microscopy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 29, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pandey, P.; Sawant, A.K.; Nithin, B.; Peng, Z.; Makineni, S.K.; Gault, B.; Chattopadhyay, K. On the effect of Re addition on microstructural evolution of a CoNi-based superalloy. Acta Mater. 2019, 168, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Harris, D.; Bhattacharyya, J.J.; Ronevich, J.A.; Agnew, S.R.; Burns, J.T. The combined effects of hydrogen and aging condition on the deformation and fracture behavior of a precipitation-hardened nickel-base superalloy. Acta Mater. 2020, 186, 616–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Cui, Y.; Djukic, M.B.; Feng, H.; Wang, Y. Review of the hydrogen embrittlement and interactions be-tween hydrogen and microstructural interfaces in metallic alloys: Grain boundary, twin boundary, and nano-precipitate. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 72, 74–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khalid, H.; Shunmugasamy, V.C.; DeMott, R.W.; Hattar, K.; Mansoor, B. Effect of grain size and precipitates on hydro-gen embrittlement susceptibility of nickel alloy 718. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 55, 474–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhou, L.; Zhang, H.; Yu, Z.; Wang, J.; Cui, H. Hydrogen-induced fatigue behavior of GH4169 alloy: Experimentation and crystal plasticity life prediction modeling. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 193, 152356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zheng, L.; Shen, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Ramamurty, U.; Hu, J. Effect of the solutioning temperature on the strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the laser powder bed fused Inconel 718 superalloy. Corros. Sci. 2026, 262, 113642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Selvaraju, R.R.; Cogswell, M.; Das, A.; Vedantam, R.; Parikh, D.; Batra, D. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1610.02391. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02391.
  79. Campari, A.; Konert, F.; Razavi, N.; Sobol, O.; Alvaro, A. Hydrogen-assisted cracking: A deep learning approach for fractographic analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2026, 262, 114366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Balitskii, A.; Ivaskevich, L.; Mochulskyi, V.; Eliasz, J.; Skolozdra, O. Influence of high pressure and high temperature hydrogen on fracture toughness of Ni-containing steels and alloys. Arch. Mech. Eng. 2014, LXI, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Robertson, I.M.; Sofronis, P.; Nagao, A.; Martin, M.L.; Wang, S.; Gross, D.W.; Nygren, K.E. Hydrogen embrittlement understood. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2015, 46, 2323–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Michler, T.; Schweizer, F.; Wackermann, K. Review on the influence of temperature upon hydrogen effects in structural alloys. Metals 2021, 11, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhou, C.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, L. The impact of impurity gases on the hydrogen embrittlement behavior of pipeline steel in high-pressure H2 environments. Materials 2024, 17, 2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Guo, Z.; Zhao, M.; Li, C.; Chen, S.; Rong, L. Mechanism of hydrogen embrittlement in a gamma-prime phase strengthened Fe–Ni based austenitic alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 555, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Balitskii, O.I.; Kvasnytska, Y.H.; Ivaskevych, L.M.; Mialnitsa, H.P.; Kvasnytska, K.H. Fatigue fracture of the blades of gas turbine engine made of a new refractory nickel alloy. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. LECO Corporation. TCH 600–Series (Nitrogen, Oxygen, Hydrogen Determination)–Technical/Application Note; LECO Corporation: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2003; 6p, Available online: https://www.lecomexico.com/inorganico/tch600series209-105.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2026).
  87. El-Bagoury, N. Microstructure and mechanical properties of aged nickel base superalloy. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 3, 266–276. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260639167_Microstructure_and_Mechanical_Properties_of_Aged_Nickel_Base_Superalloy (accessed on 14 May 2026).
  88. El-Bagoury, N.; Mohsen, Q. Gamma prime and TCP phases and mechanical properties of thermally exposed nickel-base superalloy. Phase Transit. 2011, 84, 1108–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Álvarez, G.; Harris, Z.; Wada, K.; Rodríguez, C.; Martínez-Pañeda, E. Hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: Influence of post-processing, printing direction, temperature and pre-straining. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 78, 103834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yu, H.; Díaz, A.; Lu, X.; Sun, B.; Ding, Y.; Koyama, M.; He, J.; Zhou, X.; Oudriss, A.; Feaugas, X.; et al. Hydrogen embrittlement as a conspicuous material challenge—Comprehensive review and future directions. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 6271–6392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Barrera, O.; Bombac, D.; Chen, Y.; Daff, T.D.; Galindo-Nava, E.; Gong, P.; Haley, D.; Horton, R.; Katzarov, I.; Kermode, J.R.; et al. Understanding and mitigating hydrogen embrittlement of steels: A review of experimental, modelling and design progress from atomistic to continuum. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 6251–6290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Liu, J.; Zhao, M.; Rong, L. Overview of hydrogen-resistant alloys for high-pressure hydrogen environment: On the hy-drogen energy structural materials. Clean Energy 2023, 7, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Radavich, J.F.; Furrer, D.U.; Carneiro, T. The microstructure and mechanical properties of EP741NP powder metallurgy disc material. Superalloys 2008, 2008, 63–72. Available online: https://www.tms.org/superalloys/10.7449/2008/Superalloys_2008_63_72.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2026). [CrossRef]
  94. El-Bagoury, N.; Nofal, A. Microstructure of an experimental Ni base superalloy under various casting conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 527, 7793–7800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shingledecker, J.P.; Pharr, G.M. The role of eta phase formation on the creep strength and ductility of INCONEL alloy 740 at 1023 K (750 °C). Met. Mater. Trans. A 2012, 43, 1902–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bouse, G.K. Eta (η) and platelet phases in investment cast superalloys. In Superalloys 1996: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Superalloys; Kissinger, R.D., Deye, D.J., Anton, D.L., Cetel, A.D., Clouet, P., Khan, T., Eds.; TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society): Warrendale, PA, USA, 1996; pp. 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Beals, J.M. The Effect of Eta Phase on the Creep Properties of a Nickel-Based Superalloy. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  98. Kontis, P.; Kostka, A.; Raabe, D.; Gault, B. Influence of composition and precipitation evolution on damage at grain boundaries in a crept polycrystalline Ni-based superalloy. Acta Mater. 2019, 166, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sireesha, M.; Prabhu, N.; Srinivasa Rao, K. Microstructure and mechanical properties of nickel-based superalloys: A review. Mater. Sci. Proc. 2023, 10, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Im, H.J.; Pereira dos Santos, J.C.; Campbell, C.E.; Dunand, D.C. Microstructure and properties of Co-Ni-Al-W γ/γ′ sup-eralloy fabricated via laser fusion of elemental powders. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 76, 103790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ebling, F.; Bratsch, P.; Wagner, S.; Pundt, A.; Preußner, J.; Oesterlin, H.; Wackermann, K.; Michler, T. Assessing hydrogen embrittlement of alloy 718: Hollow and conventional tensile tests. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2025, 319, 111028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Rakoczy, Ł.; Rutkowski, B.; Grudzień-Rakoczy, M.; Cygan, R.; Ratuszek, W.; Zielińska-Lipiec, A. Analysis of γ′ precipitates, carbides and nano-borides in heat-treated Ni-based superalloy using SEM, STEM-EDX, and HRSTEM. Materials 2020, 13, 4452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Park, K.; Withey, P. Compositions of gamma and gamma prime phases in an as-cast nickel-based single crystal super-alloy turbine blade. Crystals 2022, 12, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, X.; Shang, H.; Gao, Q.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Sun, L. Coarsening evolution of γ′-phase and failure mechanism of Co-Ni-Al-Ti-based superalloys during isothermal aging. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 863305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wu, X.; Makineni, S.K.; Liebscher, C.H.; Dehm, G.; Mianroodi, J.R.; Shanthraj, P.; Svendsen, B.; Bürger, D.; Eggeler, G.; Raabe, D.; et al. Unveiling the Re effect in Ni-based single crystal superalloys. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Grudzień-Rakoczy, M.; Rakoczy, Ł.; Cygan, R.; Kromka, F.; Pirowski, Z.; Milkovič, O. Fabrication and characterization of the newly developed superalloys based on Inconel 740. Materials 2020, 13, 2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Grudzień-Rakoczy, M.; Rakoczy, Ł.; Cygan, R.; Chrzan, K.; Milkovič, O.; Pirowski, Z. Influence of Al/Ti ratio and Ta concentration on the as-cast microstructure, phase composition, and phase transformation temperatures of lost-wax Ni-based superalloy castings. Materials 2022, 15, 3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Sadeghi, B.; Cavaliere, P.; Stanislawska, A. 3D modelling of hydrogen embrittlement in austenitic stainless steel and nickel-based superalloy: Physical metallurgy aspects on hydrogen entrapment. Phys. Open 2025, 24, 100253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guo, W.; Zhao, H.; Ru, Y.; Pei, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, S.; Gong, S.; et al. Topologically closed packed phase and its interaction with dislocation movement in Ni–based superalloy during high–temperature creep. Crystals 2022, 12, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Antonov, S.; Huo, J.; Feng, Q.; Isheim, D.; Seidman, D.N.; Helmink, R.C.; Sun, E.; Tin, S. σ and η phase formation in ad-vanced polycrystalline Ni-base superalloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 687, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wilson, A.S. Formation and effect of topologically close-packed phases in nickel-base superalloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2017, 33, 1108–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Darolia, R.; Lahrman, D.F.; Field, R.D. Formation of topologically closed-packed phases in nickel-based single-crystal superalloys. In Superalloys 1988—Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Superalloys; Reichman, S., Duhl, D.N., Maurer, G., Antolovich, S., Lund, C., Eds.; The Metallurgical Society (TMS): Warrendale, PA, USA, 1988; pp. 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Shi, Q.; Huo, J.; Cao, L.; Li, J.; Ding, X.; Zheng, Y.; Feng, Q. Compositional effect on TCP phase formation in Ru-containing Ni-based single crystal superalloys. MATEC Web Conf. 2014, 14, 01002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Liu, L.R.; Zhou, B.X.; Wang, Q.F.; Yang, Y.H.; Yu, J.J.; Sun, B.Z. Intergrowth structure of laves within μ phases in Co–Al–W base superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 844, 155822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kajima, Y.; Takaichi, A.; Kittikundecha, N.; Nakamoto, T.; Kimura, T.; Nomura, N.; Kawasaki, A.; Hanawa, T.; Takahashi, H.; Wakabayashi, N. Effect of heat-treatment temperature on microstructures and mechanical properties of Co–Cr–Mo alloys fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2018, 726, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Xiao, X.; Jin, M.; Qin, W.; Yao, J. A Review of emerging trends in laves phase research: Bibliometric analysis and visu-alization. High Temp. Mater. Process. 2024, 43, 20220319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Schirra, J.J.; Caless, R.H.; Hatala, R.W. The effect of laves phase on the mechanical properties of wrought and cast + HIP Inconel 718. Superalloys 1991, 1991, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Fan, Y.; Yue, Q.; Xia, W.; Pan, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, Z. Precipitation of β-NiAl phase in a high Ru-containing Ni-based single crystal superalloy. Mater. Lett. 2024, 362, 136215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Song, W.; Wang, X.G.; Li, J.G.; Meng, J.; Duan, T.F.; Yang, Y.H.; Liu, J.L.; Liu, J.D.; Pei, W.L.; Zhou, Y.Z.; et al. The formation and evolution of NiAl phase in a fourth generation nickel-based single crystal superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 848, 156584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wahlmann, B.; Bandorf, J.; Volz, N.; Förner, A.; Pröbstle, J.; Multerer, K.; Göken, M.; Markl, M.; Neumeier, S.; Körner, C. Numerical design of CoNi-base superalloys with improved casting structure. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2023, 54, 1683–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cao, K.; Yang, W.; Liu, C.; Qu, P.; Qin, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L. Precipitation of TCP phases with R/P intergrowth structure during directional solidification in a Ru-containing nickel-based single crystal superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 942, 168951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhao, Y.; Chang, Y.; Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, C. P phase precipitation and strengthening behavior of a novel polycrystalline Ni3Al-based intermetallic alloy at 1100 °C. Acta Mater. 2024, 265, 119601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ruan, J.J.; Ueshima, N.; Oikawa, K. Growth behavior of the δ-Ni3Nb phase in superalloy 718 and modified KJMA modeling for the transformation-time-temperature diagram. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 814, 152289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Páramo-Kañetas, P.J.; Orozco-Mendoza, E.A.; Calvo, J.; Cabrera-Marrero, J.-M.; Zamora-Antuñano, M.A.; Guerrero-Mata, M.P. Microstructural analysis of a partially recrystallized nickel-based superalloy undergoing delta-processing. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 907, 164403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kañetas, P.J.P.; Calvo, J.; Rodriguez-Calvillo, P.; Cabrera Marrero, J.M.; Zamora Antuñano, M.A.; Guerrero-Mata, M.P. EBSD study of delta-processed Ni-based superalloy. Metals 2020, 10, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Volpato, G.M.; Vollhüter, J.; Diepold, B.; Meier, M.S.; Pröbstle, M.; Göken, M.; Niendorf, T.; Felfer, P.; Neumeier, S. Revealing the γ′ and γ″ phase fractions of additively manufactured and differently heat-treated nickel-base superalloy IN718 by atom probe tomography and their impact on mechanical properties. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2024, 27, 2401954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lee, S.-Y.; Kim, H.-J.; Ahn, C.-H.; Baek, S.-W.; Shim, J.-H.; Suh, J.-Y. Hydrogen-induced intergranular fracture behavior accelerated by needle-like MC carbide in IN740H superalloy. Hydrogen 2022, 3, 474–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Araujo, L.S.; Guimaraes, A.V.; Siqueira, M.C.; Mendes, M.C.; Mallet, L.; dos Santos, D.S.; de Almeida, L.H. The influence of the processing route on the fragmentation of (Nb,Ti)C stringers and its role on mechanical properties and hydrogen embrittlement of nickel based alloy 718. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 16164–16178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Depover, T.; Verbeken, K. The detrimental effect of hydrogen at dislocations on the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of Fe-C-X alloys: An experimental proof of the HELP mechanism. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 3050–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Balitskii, A.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Havrilyuk, M.R.; Balitska, V.O.; Ripey, I.V.; Królikowski, M.A.; Pudlo, T.K. Steel hydrogen-induced degradation diagnostics for turbo aggregated rotor shaft repair technologies. Energies 2025, 18, 4368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Balitskii, A.I.; Syrotyuk, A.M.; Havrilyuk, M.R.; Balitska, V.O.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Ivaskevych, L.M. Hydrogen cooling of turbo aggregates and the problem of rotor shafts materials degradation evaluation. Energies 2023, 16, 7851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Reed, R.C. The Superalloys: Fundamentals and Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; 372p. [Google Scholar]
  133. Balitskii, O.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Ivaskevych, L.M.; Havrylyuk, M.R. The influence of specific features of load and hydrogen charging on steel tribotechnical properties. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 502–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Glotka, O.A.; Ol’shanetskii, V.I. Mathematical forecasting composition of secondary carbides in the single-crystal superalloys. Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 111, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Balitskii, A.; Kolesnikov, V.; Abramek, K.F.; Balitskii, O.; Eliasz, J.; Marya, H.; Ivaskevych, L.; Kolesnikova, I. Influence of hydrogen-containing fuels and environmentally friendly lubricating coolant on nitrogen steels’ wear resistance for spark ignition engine pistons and rings kit gasket set. Energies 2021, 14, 7583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Balitskii, A.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Balitska, V.O.; Ivaskevych, L.M.; Dowejko, J.M.; Pilecki, B.J.; Havrilyuk, M.R. Computer-integrated surface image processing of hydrogen-saturated steel wear products. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Dmytrakh, I.; Syrotyuk, A.; Hembara, O.; Hrynenko, M. Effect of hydrogen concentration in metal on residual durability of defected pipelines. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2024, 59, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hembara, O.; Syrotyuk, A.; Chepil, O.; Sapuzhak, Y.; Hembara, N. Evaluation of increased local hydrogen concentration in the vicinity of various types of defects in low-alloyed steels. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2024, 59, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Dmytrakh, I.M.; Syrotyuk, A.M.; Leshchak, R.L. Specific features of the deformation and fracture of low-alloy steels in hydrogen-containing media: Influence of hydrogen concentration in the metal. Mater. Sci. 2018, 54, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Pokhmurs’kyi, V.I.; Kopylets’, V.I.; Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Kornii, S.A. Investigation of the effect of deformation of metals on their interaction with media on the atomic level. Mater. Sci. 1996, 32, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Choudhury, I.A.; El-Baradie, M.A. Machinability of nickel-base super alloys: A general review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1998, 77, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Wang, R.; Yang, D.; Wang, W.; Wei, F.; Lu, Y.; Li, Y. Tool wear in nickel-based superalloy machining: An overview. Processes 2022, 10, 2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Balitskii, A.I.; Havrilyuk, M.R.; Balitska, V.O.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Ivaskevych, L.M. Increasing turbine hall safety by using fire-resistant, hydrogen-containing lubricant cooling liquid for rotor steel mechanical treatment. Energies 2023, 16, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Havrylyuk, M.R. Influence of modification of 38KhN3MFA steel on the structural-phase state and cutting products under variable technological conditions. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Havrylyuk, M.R. Influence of lubricating liquid on the formation of the products of cutting of 38KhN3MFA Steel. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 722–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Balitskii, O.; Kolesnikov, V. Identification of wear products in the automotive tribotechnical system using computer vision methods, artificial intelligence and big data. In Proceedings of the 2019 XIth International Scientific and Practical Conference on Electronics and Information Technologies (ELIT), Lviv, Ukraine, 16–18 September 2019; pp. 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O. Investigation of the wear products of austenitic manganese cast irons. Mater. Sci. 2004, 40, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Kawiak, P. Triboengineering properties of austenitic manganese steels and cast irons under sliding friction conditions. Mater. Sci. 2005, 41, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Balitskii, A.I.; Syrotyuk, A.M.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Balitska, V.O.; Ivaskevych, L.M.; Havrilyuk, M.R. The effect of absorbed hydrogen on the rotors of steel machining products during powerful turbo aggregate repairs. Materials 2024, 17, 6257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Eliasz, Y.; Havrylyuk, M.R. Specific features of the fracture of hydrogenated high-nitrogen manganese steels under conditions of rolling friction. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Balitskii, O.A.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Balitskii, A.I.; Eliasz, J.; Havrylyuk, M.R. Hydrogen effect on the high-nickel surface steel properties during machining and wear with lubricants. Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 104, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Nykyforchyn, H.; Kyryliv, V.; Maksymiv, O.; Zvirko, O. Mechanical fabrication methods of nanostructured surfaces. In Handbook of Modern Coating Technologies: Fabrication Methods and Functional Properties; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 25–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kusyi, Y.; Stupnytskyy, V.; Onysko, O.; Dragašius, E.; Baskutis, S.; Chatys, R. Optimization synthesis of technological parameters during manufacturing of the parts. Eksploat. Niezawodn. 2022, 24, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Onysko, O.; Panchuk, V.; Kopei, V.; Pituley, L.; Lukan, T. Influence of back rake angle of a threading cutter on the drill-string tool-joint pitch diameter. In Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Jaworski, J.; Trzepieciński, T. Quality assurance of machine repair in production plants. Acta Metall. Slovaca 2017, 23, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kalchenko, V.; Yeroshenko, A.; Boyko, S.; Sira, N. Determination of cutting forces in grinding with crossed axes of tool and workpiece. Acta Mech. Autom. 2017, 11, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Jaworski, J.; Trzepieciński, T. Surface layer properties of low-alloy high-speed steel after grinding. Acta Mech. Autom. 2016, 10, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  158. Duriagina, Z.A.; Trostianchyn, A.M.; Kulyk, V.V.; Vavrukh, V.I.; Filimonov, O.S. Specific features of the fine structure and local stress state of 13Kh11N2V2MF steel under cyclic loading. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 711–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Jaworski, J.; Trzepieciński, T. Research on durability of turning tools made of low-alloy high-speed steels. Kov. Mater. 2016, 54, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Hussain, M.; Zhang, T.; Nazir, U. Emerging technologies and innovations. In Hydrogen Pipeline Integrity; Green Energy and Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ivaskevych, L.M. Evaluation of the KhN56MBYuD alloy embrittlement under long-term action of hydrogen and high temperatures. Mater. Sci. 2025, 61, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Khoma, M.S.; Ivashkiv, V.R.; Halaichak, S.A.; Chuchman, M.R.; Vasyliv, K.B. Influence of the structure of carbon steels on the corrosion, hydrogenation, and corrosion cracking in hydrogen-sulfide media. Mater. Sci. 2019, 55, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tretiak, O.; Kravchenko, S.; Shestak, B.; Shpitalnyi, D.; Arefieva, M.; Tretiak, I.; Serhiienko, S.; Kovryga, A. Devising a method for designing multicomponent diffusers of compressors in turbogenerators with hydrogen cooling. East.-Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. 2025, 4, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Gakal, P.; Ovsiannykova, O.; Przybysz, J.; Tretiak, O. Analysis of the temperature field of the rotor of a 550 MW turbogenerator with direct hydrogen cooling. Prz. Elektrotech. 2017, 93, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  165. Javorskyj, I.; Torba, Y.; Yuzefovych, R.; Sbrodov, Y.; Lychak, O. Periodically Non-stationary properties of vibrations in a gas turbine engine with an unbalanced rotor. Sci. Innov. 2025, 21, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ivanytskyj, Y.; Shtayura, S.; Molkov, Y.; Lenkovskiy, T. Hydrogen influence on fracture of sheet carbon steel. Int. J. Fract. 2012, 176, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Peshko, V.; Usatyi, O.; Chernousenko, O. The efficiency and durability of a nuclear power plant turbine without the stage of damaged blades. In Advances in Mechanical and Power Engineering II; Altenbach, H., Gao, X.W., Syngellakis, S., Cheng, A.H.D., Lampart, P., Tkachuk, A., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Balitskii, A.I.; Dmytryk, V.V.; Ivaskevich, L.M.; Balitskii, O.A.; Glushko, A.V.; Medovar, L.B.; Abramek, K.F.; Stovpchenko, G.P.; Eliasz, J.J.; Krolikowski, M.A. Improvement of the mechanical characteristics, hydrogen crack resistance and durability of turbine rotor steels welded joints. Energies 2022, 15, 6006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Balyts’kyi, O.O. Elastic characteristics of laminated gallium and indium chalcogenides. Mater. Sci. 2004, 40, 706–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Khoma, M.S.; Korniy, S.A.; Vynar, V.A.; Datsko, B.M.; Maksishko, Y.Y.; Dykha, O.V.; Bukliv, R.L. Influence of hydrogen sulfide on carbon dioxide corrosion and the mechanical characteristics of high-strength pipe steel. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Balitskii, A.; Kindrachuk, M.; Volchenko, D.; Abramek, K.F.; Balitskii, O.; Skrypnyk, V.; Zhuravlev, D.; Bekish, I.; Ostashuk, M.; Kolesnikov, V. Hydrogen containing nanofluids in the spark engine’s cylinder head cooling system. Energies 2022, 15, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Shpotyuk, Y.; Demchenko, P.; Shpotyuk, O.; Balitska, V.; Boussard-Pledel, C.; Bureau, B.; Lukáčová Bujňáková, Z.; Baláž, P. High-energy mechanical milling-driven reamorphization in glassy arsenic monoselenide: On the path of tailoring special molecular-network glasses. Materials 2021, 14, 4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Balitskii, A.I.; Vytvytskyi, V.I.; Ivaskevich, L.M. The low-cycle fatigue of corrosion-resistant steels in high pressure hydrogen. Procedia Eng. 2010, 2, 2367–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Yuzevych, V.M.; Lozovan, V.P. Influence of mechanical stresses on the propagation of corrosion cracks in pipeline walls. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Shpotyuk, O.I.; Balitska, V.O.; Vakiv, M.M.; Shpotyuk, L. Sensors of high-energy radiation based on amorphous chalcogenides. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 1998, 68, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Kolesnikov, V. The influence of microstructure parameters on the formation of cutting products during machining of parts from steels 38KhN3MFA taking into account the influence of hydrogen. In Advanced and Novel Technologies—Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Materials Science; Aikin, M., Smolyakov, O., Girzhon, V., Tkach, D., Belikov, S., Yar-Mukhamedova, G.S., Shalomeev, V., Narivskyi, O., Eds.; ANTICM 2025; Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Balitska, V.O.; Golovchak, R.; Kovalskiy, A.; Skordeva, E.; Shpotyuk, O. Effect of Co60 γ-irradiation on the optical properties of As-Ge-S glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 326–327, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Kubicki, E. Enhancement of the crack resistance of manganese cast irons. Mater. Sci. 2005, 41, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ol’shanetskii, V.Y.; Glotka, O.A. Influence of alloying elements on the composition of primary carbides in the Ni–11.5Cr–5Co–3.6Al–4.5Ti–7W–0.8Mo–0.06C system. Met. Adv. Technol. 2022, 44, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Krechkovska, H.V.; Solovei, P.R.; Student, O.Z. Effect of non-metallic inclusions in steel structure on the premature failure of the steam turbine rotor disk. Mater. Sci. 2025, 61, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Kindrachuk, M.; Volchenko, D.; Balitskii, A.; Abramek, K.F.; Volchenko, M.; Balitskii, O.; Skrypnyk, V.; Zhuravlev, D.; Yurchuk, A.; Kolesnikov, V. Wear resistance of spark ignition engine piston rings in hydrogen-containing environments. Energies 2021, 14, 4801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Humnabad, P.S.; Tarun, R.; Das, I. An overview of direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technology for metal 3D printing. J. Mines Met. Fuels 2022, 70, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Żaba, K.; Balcerzak, M.; Kuczek, Ł.; Wiewióra, M.; Różycka, I.; Trzepieciński, T.; Mizera, J. Application of powder-bed fusion of metals using a laser for manufacturing of M300 maraging steel tools intended for sheet metal bending. Materials 2024, 17, 6185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Kanishka, K.; Acherjee, B. A systematic review of additive manufacturing-based remanufacturing techniques for com-ponent repair and restoration. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 89, 220–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Trzepieciński, T.; Kowalik, M.; Najm, S.M.; Laouini, S.E.; Mezher, M.T. Emerging trends in advanced biomimetic composite materials inspired by biological structures and functions in nature. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2025, 12, 775–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. CNC vs. Additive Manufacturing (AM): 3 Scenarios Where AM Wins. Available online: https://www.stratasys.com/en/166.resources/blog/cnc-vs-additive-manufacturing-am-3-scenarios-where-am-wins/ (accessed on 14 May 2026).
  187. Trzepieciński, T. Recent Developments and Trends in Sheet Metal Forming. Metals 2020, 10, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Zhu, S.; Du, W.; Wang, X.; Han, G.; Ren, Z.; Zhou, K. Advanced additive remanufacturing technology. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. Addit. Manuf. Front. 2023, 2, 100066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zastosowania Druku 3D Dla Stali Narzedziowej. Available online: https://centrumdruku3d.pl/zastosowania-druku-3d-dla-stali-narzedziowej/ (accessed on 14 May 2026).
  190. Leal, R.; Barreiros, F.M.; Alves, L.; Romeiro, F.; Vasco, J.C.; Santos, M.; Marto, C. Additive manufacturing tooling for the automotive industry. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 92, 1671–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Najm, S.M.; Oleksik, V.; Trzepieciński, T. Applications of incremental sheet forming. In Analysis and Optimization of Sheet Metal Forming Processes; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Balcerzak, M.; Żaba, K.; Hojny, M.; Puchlerska, S.; Kuczek, Ł.; Trzepieciński, T.; Novák, V. Experimental research and numerical modelling of the cold forming process of the Inconel 625 alloy sheets using flexible punch. Materials 2024, 17, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Ihnatieva, V. Improving the quality of complex profile products from composites used in earthquake-resistant structures. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2024, 59, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ihnatieva, V. Research of technological processing of semi-finished products in the manufacture of profile products from composite materials. Strength Mater. Theory Struct. 2024, 112, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Glotka, O.A.; Ovchinnikov, O.V.; Degtyaryov, V.I.; Kameneva, S.A. Application of domestic heat-resistant powders in additive techniques. Powder Metall. Metal. Ceram. 2018, 56, 726–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Żaba, K.; Balcerzak, M.; Pałka, P.; Čada, R.; Trzepieciński, T.; Szczepańska, M. Effect of build-up strategy and selective laser melting process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel. Materials 2026, 19, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Lamb, J.; Pusch, K.M.; Polonsky, A.T.; Forsik, S.A.J.; Zhou, N.; Dicus, A.D.; Geurts, R.; Echlin, M.P.; Pollock, T.M. Analysis of the high cracking resistance of a Co–Ni superalloy during laser additive manufacturing. Scr. Mater. 2024, 239, 115770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Adomako, N.; Haghdadi, N.; Primig, S. Electron- and laser-based additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys: A Review of heterogeneities in microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Des. 2022, 223, 111245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Li, Y.; Liang, X.; Yu, Y.; Wang, D.; Lin, F. Review on additive manufacturing of single-crystal nickel-based superalloys. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. Addit. Manuf. Front. 2022, 1, 100019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Aydogan, B.; Sahasrabudhe, H. Enabling Multi-Material Structures of Co-Based Superalloy Using Laser Directed Energy Deposition Additive Manufacturing. Metals 2021, 11, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Hu, R.; Zhao, J.; Yang, C.; Du, J.; Luo, X.; Bi, Z.; Gan, B. Temperature effects on the deformation mechanisms in a Ni-Co-based superalloys. Crystals 2022, 12, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Wang, Z.; Yu, H.; Ning, Y.; Xie, B.; Huang, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, B. Dislocation motion and deformation mechanism of Ni-Co-Cr superalloys with intra-intergranular γ′-precipitates and μ-phases. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1031, 181032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Liu, P.; Zhang, R.; Yuan, Y.; Cui, C.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, X. Hot deformation behavior and workability of a Ni–Co based superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 831, 154618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Im, H.J.; Pereira dos Santos, J.C.; Campbell, C.E.; Dunand, D.C. Co–Ni–Al–W γ/γ′ superalloy with Cr and Ti additions fabricated via laser fusion of elemental powders. Mater. Sci. Engin. A 2024, 914, 147105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Attallah, M.M.; Jennings, R.; Wang, X.; Carter, L.N. Additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys: The outstanding issues. MRS Bull. 2016, 41, 758–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Takasawa, K.; Nishimoto, K.; Ikeda, R.; Hashi, K. Hydrogen environment embrittlement in nickel-base superalloy alloy 617. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 36158–36168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Matache, G.; Paraschiv, A.; Condruz, M.R. Tensile notch sensitivity of additively manufactured IN 625 superalloy. Materials 2020, 13, 4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Lee, D.-H.; Zhao, Y.; Lee, S.Y. Hydrogen-assisted failure in Inconel 718 fabricated by laser powder bed fusion: The role of solidification substructure in the embrittlement. Scr. Mater. 2022, 207, 114308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Zhang, Y.; Lan, L.; Zhao, Y. Effect of precipitated phases on the mechanical properties and fracture mechanisms of Inconel 718 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2023, 864, 144598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Tolcha, M.A.; Altenbach, H.; Naumenko, K.; Lemu, H.G. Computational and experimental investigation of thermodynamic and atomic diffusion behavior in relation to microstructural evolution for Inconel 718 alloy during the wire arc additive manufacturing process. J. Alloys Compd. 2026, 1050, 185783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Guo, C.; Li, G.; Li, S.; Hu, X.; Lu, H.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, Q.; Lu, J.; et al. Additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys: Residual stress, mechanisms of crack formation and strategies for crack inhibition. Nano Mater. Sci. 2023, 5, 53–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Shahwaz, M.; Nath, P.; Sen, I. Recent advances in additive manufacturing technologies for Ni-Based Inconel superalloys—A comprehensive review. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1010, 177654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Antonio del Bosque, A.; Fernández-Arias, P.; Vergara, D. Advances in the additive manufacturing of superalloys. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2025, 9, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Enrique, P.D.; Minasyan, T.; Toyserkani, E. Laser powder bed fusion of difficult-to-print γ′ Ni-based superalloys: A review of processing approaches, properties, and remaining challenges. Addit. Manuf. 2025, 106, 104811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Dai, K.; He, X.; Kong, D.; Revilla, R.I.; Ji, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhangm, W.; Fu, A.; Dong, C. High-strength yet hydrogen embrittlement-resistant laser powder bed fusion Inconel 718 alloy through heat treatment. Corros. Sci. 2025, 256, 113208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Yao, J.; Tan, Q.; Venezuela, J.; Atrens, A.; Zhang, M.-X. Recent research progress in hydrogen embrittlement of additively manufactured metals—A review. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2023, 27, 101106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Koval, N.O.; Vodennikova, O.S. Investigation of mechanical properties and structure of in718 alloy produced by 3d-printing. Aerosp. Tech. Technol. 2020, 3, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Wang, C.; Zheng, R.; Liu, X.; Li, M.; Chen, D. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and residual stress of a nickel-cobalt-based superalloy produced by laser powder bed fusion. Metals 2025, 15, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Chauvet, E.; Kontis, P.; Jägle, E.A.; Gault, B.; Raabe, D.; Tassin, C.; Blandin, J.-J.; Dendievel, R.; Vayre, B.; Abed, S.; et al. Hot cracking mechanism affecting a non-weldable Ni-based superalloy produced by selective electron beam melting. Acta Mater. 2018, 142, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Fardan, A.; Gårdstam, J.; Oscarsson, E.; Brodin, H.; Hryha, E. Impact of hot isostatic pressing on microstructure evolution and creep performance of powder bed fusion–laser beam processed. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2025, 27, 2500691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Kvasnytska, Y.H.; Ivaskevich, L.M.; Balitskii, A.I.; Kvasnytska, K.H.; Mialnitsa, H.P. Structural and mechanical properties of the nickel alloy of gas-turbine engine blades. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Ren, S.; Zhang, R.; Bu, K.; Xiao, Z.; Liu, J. Turbine blade investment casting: A review of process mechanisms, modeling, and intelligent manufacturing. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2026, 163, 101748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Tkachov, V.I.; Ivaskevych, L.M.; Mochulskyi, V.M. Temperature dependences of the mechanical properties of austenitic and martensitic steels in hydrogen. Mater. Sci. 2007, 43, 654–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Balitskii, O.I.; Ivaskevich, L.M.; Mochulskyi, V.M. Temperature dependences of age-hardening austenitic steels mechanical properties in gaseous hydrogen. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Fracture, ICF-12, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 12–17 July 2009; Paper No. T19.001; Code 93954; Elboujdaini, M., Ed.; NRC: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2009; Volume 8; pp. 5786–5792. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281269596_Temperature_Dependences_of_Agehardening_Austenitic_Steels_Mechanical_Properties_in_Gaseous_Hydrogen (accessed on 14 May 2026).
  225. Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Ivas’kevych, L.M.; Mochul’s’kyi, V.M.; Holiyan, O.M. Influence of hydrogen on the crack resistance of 10Kh15N27T3V2MR steel. Mater. Sci. 2009, 45, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Johnson, J.; Kujawski, D. Impact of notches on additively manufactured Inconel 718 tensile performance. Materials 2023, 16, 6740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Mohandas, N.K.; Giorgini, A.; Vanazzi, M.; Riemslag, T.; Scott, S.P.; Popovich, V. Hydrogen embrittlement of inconel 718 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion using sustainable feedstock: Effect of heat treatment and microstructural anisotropy. Metals 2023, 13, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Diepold, B.; Vorlaufer, N.; Neumeier, S.; Göken, M. Optimization of the heat treatment of additively manufactured Ni-base superalloy IN718. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2020, 27, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Xi, N.; Fang, X.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, K. Wire arc additive manufacturing of Inconel 718: Constitutive modelling and its microstructure basis. J. Manufact. Process. 2022, 75, 1134–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Attaran, M. The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Bus. Horiz. 2017, 60, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Shahwaz, M.; Nath, P.; Sen, I. A critical review on the microstructure and mechanical properties correlation of additively manufactured nickel-based superalloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 907, 164530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Saleh, B.; Fathi, R.; Zhao, L. Additive manufacturing of nickel superalloys: A critical review of recent advances and future perspectives. Appl. Mater. Today 2026, 48, 103051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Maldonado, C.-T.S.; Zafra, A.; Pañeda, E.M.; Sandmann, P.; Morana, R.; Pham, M.-S. Influence of dislocation cells on hydrogen embrittlement in wrought and additively manufactured Inconel 718. Commun. Mater. 2024, 5, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Sridharan, V.S.; Verma, V.K.; Lakshmi Narayan, R.; Lu, X.; Siwei, D.; Chaudhary, V.; Hua, L.; ZhiLi, D. Hydrogen embrittlement of additively manufactured metallic materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 121, 245–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Jang, J.; Ko, T.; Lee, J.; Kim, D.; Hwang, H.; Jeong, T.; Lee, S.H. Energy-assisted additive manufacturing for weldable and non-weldable Ni-based superalloys: A review. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2025, 20, e2512163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A fragment of the Ni–Co superalloy microstructure obtained by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in bright-field mode (a). Preparation of the image for statistical analysis—highlighting the structural constituents, the γ′ phase, in red (b).
Figure 1. A fragment of the Ni–Co superalloy microstructure obtained by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in bright-field mode (a). Preparation of the image for statistical analysis—highlighting the structural constituents, the γ′ phase, in red (b).
Energies 19 03295 g001
Figure 2. Histogram of the size distribution of precipitates (structural constituents—γ′ phase) with a fitted normal distribution (Gaussian) curve. Number of precipitates: 282. Standard deviation: ≈53.2 nm. Mean size: ≈98.9 nm.
Figure 2. Histogram of the size distribution of precipitates (structural constituents—γ′ phase) with a fitted normal distribution (Gaussian) curve. Number of precipitates: 282. Standard deviation: ≈53.2 nm. Mean size: ≈98.9 nm.
Energies 19 03295 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of the equivalent diameter of the γ′-phase precipitates (a). Distribution of the circularity of the γ′-phase precipitates (b).
Figure 3. Distribution of the equivalent diameter of the γ′-phase precipitates (a). Distribution of the circularity of the γ′-phase precipitates (b).
Energies 19 03295 g003
Figure 4. Aspect ratio (a). Nearest-neighbor distance distribution for the γ′-phase precipitates (b).
Figure 4. Aspect ratio (a). Nearest-neighbor distance distribution for the γ′-phase precipitates (b).
Energies 19 03295 g004
Figure 5. Log-normal approximation of the γ′-phase precipitate-size distribution (a). Empirical CDF (b).
Figure 5. Log-normal approximation of the γ′-phase precipitate-size distribution (a). Empirical CDF (b).
Energies 19 03295 g005
Figure 6. Classification of γ′-phase precipitate sizes (a). Morphology of the γ′-phase precipitates (b).
Figure 6. Classification of γ′-phase precipitate sizes (a). Morphology of the γ′-phase precipitates (b).
Energies 19 03295 g006
Figure 7. Orientation-colored γ′-phase precipitates (<80 nm) (a). Orientation-colored γ′-phase precipitates (<80 nm) (b).
Figure 7. Orientation-colored γ′-phase precipitates (<80 nm) (a). Orientation-colored γ′-phase precipitates (<80 nm) (b).
Energies 19 03295 g007
Figure 8. Grad-CAM activation map superimposed on the SEM microstructure of a Ni–Co γ/γ′ superalloy.
Figure 8. Grad-CAM activation map superimposed on the SEM microstructure of a Ni–Co γ/γ′ superalloy.
Energies 19 03295 g008
Figure 9. Microstructure of as-cast Ni-based superalloy (a). Aged microstructure at 845 °C [87,88] (b).
Figure 9. Microstructure of as-cast Ni-based superalloy (a). Aged microstructure at 845 °C [87,88] (b).
Energies 19 03295 g009
Figure 10. η-phase and σ-phase in as-cast microstructure (a). γ/γ′ inter-dendritic and η-phase in cast microstructures [94] (b).
Figure 10. η-phase and σ-phase in as-cast microstructure (a). γ/γ′ inter-dendritic and η-phase in cast microstructures [94] (b).
Energies 19 03295 g010
Figure 11. A schematic consolidated representation of the Ni–Co superalloy microstructure before hydrogen charging (a) and after hydrogen charging (b). Legend: 1—γ-matrix; 2—γ′ precipitates; 3—σ phase; 4—η phase; 5—MC carbides; 6—M6C carbides; 7—M7C3 carbides; 8—M23C6 carbides; 9—intermetallic phases; 10—twins; 11—crack on the component sur-face; 12—crack propagating into the component interior; 13—crack within the grain interior; 14—hydrogen.
Figure 11. A schematic consolidated representation of the Ni–Co superalloy microstructure before hydrogen charging (a) and after hydrogen charging (b). Legend: 1—γ-matrix; 2—γ′ precipitates; 3—σ phase; 4—η phase; 5—MC carbides; 6—M6C carbides; 7—M7C3 carbides; 8—M23C6 carbides; 9—intermetallic phases; 10—twins; 11—crack on the component sur-face; 12—crack propagating into the component interior; 13—crack within the grain interior; 14—hydrogen.
Energies 19 03295 g011
Table 1. Size distribution of γ′ precipitates. The size ranges represent equivalent particle diameters (nm) determined from image analysis.
Table 1. Size distribution of γ′ precipitates. The size ranges represent equivalent particle diameters (nm) determined from image analysis.
NoPrecipitate Size Range (nm)CountFraction (%)
1.21–607627.0
2.60–999132.3
3.99–1385218.4
4.138–1773713.1
5.177–216155.3
Table 2. Box-plot classification by size classes.
Table 2. Box-plot classification by size classes.
γ′ Precipitate ClassSizePurpose
Secondary<80 nmPrimary strengthening effect
Primary-like≥80 nmIndicator of partial coalescence
Table 3. Influence of intermetallic phases on the properties of Ni–Co superalloys.
Table 3. Influence of intermetallic phases on the properties of Ni–Co superalloys.
PhaseTypeStabilizing ElementsImpact on Properties.Reference
γ′ phaseL12 FCC (face-centered cubic)Al, Ti, Nb, TaIncreased high-temperature strength, precipitation strengthening; increased heat resistance, precipitation hardening; spherical shape.[98,99]
γ″ phase (Ni3Nb) coherent with FCC like γ′ BCT (body-centered tetragonal) DO22 (space group I4/mmm), coherent with matrix γ-Ni.Stable up to 650 °C, with Ni3Nb appear Ni3V, Ni3Mo, Ni3Ta, Ni3WOrdered metastable intermetallic phase, Ni3Nb; disk-shaped particles, with pronounced anisotropy along the c axis, which is responsible for the primary strengthening of superalloys. Lattice parameters γ″: a ≈ 3.62–3.64 Å; c ≈ 7.41–7.49 Å.[98,99,100,101]
η-phase (Ni3Ti) non coherentD019 TCP (topologically close packed)Ti, TaPromotes embrittlement, impedes deformation. Forms slowly, which causes brittleness and makes deformation difficult. The absorbed hydrogen enhances the negative trends.[100,101,102,103]
σ phaseTCP Cr, Mo, WBrittleness causes a reduction in ductility and fracture toughness, and a decrease in ductility and crack resistance. The absorbed hydrogen enhances the negative trends.[104,105,106,107]
μ-phase, (Mu-phase) TCPMo, W, Cr, ReReduced ductility. The absorbed hydrogen exacerbates the negative trends.[107,108,109]
Laves phaseTCPNb, Ti, MoEmbrittlement, failure. Absorbed hydrogen exacerbates negative trends.[110,111,112]
β-phaseB2 orthorhombicNi–Al–TiHigh heat resistance.[113,114,115]
R-phaseTCPReRisk of cracking. The absorbed hydrogen exacerbates the negative trends.[108]
P-phaseTCPRe, Mo, WA very fragile phase. The absorbed hydrogen exacerbates the negative trends.[116,117]
δ-phaseNi3NbNbBorderline embrittlement. The absorbed hydrogen exacerbates the negative trends.[118,119,120,121]
γ-phase (Ni)HCC A1Co, Cr, Fe, V, W, TaStrengthen the solid solution.[120,121,122,123]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Balitskii, A.I.; Kolesnikov, V.O.; Ivaskevych, L.M.; Balitskii, O.A.; Królikowski, M.A.; Dowejko, J.M. Additively Manufactured Ni–Co Superalloys for Hydrogen Safety Enhancement of Gas-Turbine Energy Systems: Microstructural Degradation and Crack Initiation Mechanisms. Energies 2026, 19, 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143295

AMA Style

Balitskii AI, Kolesnikov VO, Ivaskevych LM, Balitskii OA, Królikowski MA, Dowejko JM. Additively Manufactured Ni–Co Superalloys for Hydrogen Safety Enhancement of Gas-Turbine Energy Systems: Microstructural Degradation and Crack Initiation Mechanisms. Energies. 2026; 19(14):3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Balitskii, Alexander I., Valerii O. Kolesnikov, Ljubomyr M. Ivaskevych, Olexiy A. Balitskii, Marcin A. Królikowski, and Jakub M. Dowejko. 2026. "Additively Manufactured Ni–Co Superalloys for Hydrogen Safety Enhancement of Gas-Turbine Energy Systems: Microstructural Degradation and Crack Initiation Mechanisms" Energies 19, no. 14: 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143295

APA Style

Balitskii, A. I., Kolesnikov, V. O., Ivaskevych, L. M., Balitskii, O. A., Królikowski, M. A., & Dowejko, J. M. (2026). Additively Manufactured Ni–Co Superalloys for Hydrogen Safety Enhancement of Gas-Turbine Energy Systems: Microstructural Degradation and Crack Initiation Mechanisms. Energies, 19(14), 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop