Real-Time Sedimentation and Operational Technology Integration to Enhance Hydropower Operational Reliability: Case Study of the Chivor Hydropower Plant in Colombia
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Hydropower’s Study Area
2.2. Sediment Situation in AES Chivor
2.3. Digital Modernization of Sediment Monitoring
- Pilot Sensors: Multiparametric probes equipped with ultrasonic and optical turbidity sensors were deployed near the intake and the reservoir’s sedimentation zones.
- Sampling Frequency: Measurements were recorded every 15 min to capture short-term variations linked to rainfall and inflow conditions.
- Data Validation: Laboratory gravimetric analyses were conducted on water–sediment samples to calibrate sensor readings, achieving an R2 correlation of 0.93 between in situ and laboratory results.
- Project Tracking System (SAP-based) for resource planning and milestone control.
- Risk Management Matrix for identifying and mitigating technical and operational risks.
- Communication Plan defining reporting frequency and stakeholder responsibilities.
- Sampling and conditioning unit: A controlled flow circuit consisting of a stainless-steel sampling tank or flow-through chamber, valves (ball and diaphragm type), and inlet/outlet connections to ensure representative and continuous water sampling. This configuration minimizes sedimentation and ensures stable hydraulic conditions for measurement.
- Acoustic (ultrasonic) sensor module: The acoustic component (e.g., NivuParQ-type sensor) operates based on multi-frequency ultrasonic backscatter, allowing: continuous measurement of suspended solids concentration, detection of particle size distribution (multiple classes, including fine particles <63 μm), and measurement range typically between 10 and 6000 mg/L. This technology is particularly suitable for environments with high turbidity and variable particle-size distributions, such as hydropower reservoirs during sediment transport events.
- Optical sensor module: The optical component (e.g., turbidity or suspended solids sensor such as Turbimax-type) operates based on light scattering/absorption, providing: continuous turbidity-based estimation of suspended solids and measurement ranges up to 5 g/L, with resolution between 1–5% of the measured value. The optical sensor complements the acoustic measurement by improving sensitivity in low-to-medium concentration regimes and providing redundancy.
- Signal processing and data acquisition system: The system incorporates transmitters (e.g., Liquiline CM444 or Nivuflow-type), dataloggers, and industrial communication modules (Modbus TCP/IP), enabling: real-time data acquisition and transmission, integration with SCADA systems, and local buffering and remote diagnostics.
- Mechanical and structural integration: The sensing system is mounted on a panel-based flow-through structure, designed for: operation under pressures between 10–30 bar, corrosion resistance (e.g., stainless steel AISI 316L), protection ratings up to IP65–IP68 depending on component location, and continuous operation in high humidity and variable temperature environments.
- 1.
- Measurement range and resolution: The system was designed to cover sediment concentrations from low background levels to extreme hydrological events (>6000 mg/L), ensuring adequate sensitivity and dynamic range.
- 2.
- Particle size sensitivity: The use of multi-frequency ultrasonic sensing enables characterization of heterogeneous sediment mixtures, which is critical in reservoir sediment dynamics.
- 3.
- Hydraulic representativeness: A controlled sampling flow (typically between 0.02 and 10 L/s, depending on configuration) ensures that measurements reflect actual flow conditions while avoiding particle settling.
- 4.
- Environmental robustness: All components were selected to withstand: high pressures (up to 30 bar), high humidity (>95%), and variable temperatures (5–45 °C). These conditions are representative of submerged or pressurized hydraulic infrastructure.
- 5.
- Redundancy and reliability: The hybrid (acoustic–optical) approach reduces uncertainty by combining two independent measurement principles, improving robustness under varying sediment conditions.
- 6.
- Integration and scalability: The system supports industrial communication protocols and SCADA integration, enabling continuous monitoring and future scalability.
3. Results
3.1. Sediment Quantification System Location
3.2. Validation of the New Method with the Traditional One
3.3. Operational Plan Following Implementation of Sediment Monitoring System
3.3.1. Real-Time Responses
3.3.2. Minimizing Risks from Pipe and Valve Blockage
3.3.3. Minimizing Risks in Turbines and Generators
3.3.4. Decreased Repair Frequency
3.3.5. Increased Reliability in Operation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| FAT | Factory Acceptance Test |
| IEA | International Energy Agency |
| LISST | Laser In Situ Scattering and Transmissometry |
| ML | Machine Learning |
| ODSM | Operational Decision Support Module |
| OT | Operational Technology |
| SCADA | Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition |
| SAT | Site Acceptance Test |
| SDG | Sustainable Development Goal |
| SSC | Suspended Sediment Concentration |
References
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- IEA; World Bank. Sustainable Energy for All 2017—Progress toward Sustainable Energy (Summary); Technical Report; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results; Techreport desa/pop/2024/tr/no. 9; United Nations Population Fund: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- IEA. World Energy Outlook 2024; Technical Report WEO-2024; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Su, H.; Hu, J.; Yang, M.; Wen, Z. Assessment and prediction for service life of water resources and hydropower engineering. Nat. Hazards 2015, 75, 3005–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fry, J.J.; Morris, M.; Schleiss, A. Hydropower, a catalyst for energy transition in Europe. LHB Hydrosci. J. 2022, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Y.; Ma, H.; Zhao, S. Assessment of hydropower sustainability: Review and modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 321, 128898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tefera, W.M.; Kasiviswanathan, K. A global-scale hydropower potential assessment and feasibility evaluations. Water Resour. Econ. 2022, 38, 100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- De Silva, T.; Jorgenson, J.; Macknick, J.; Keohan, N.; Miara, A.; Jager, H.; Pracheil, B. Hydropower operation in future power grid with various renewable power integration. Renew. Energy Focus 2022, 43, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vagnoni, E.; Gezer, D.; Anagnostopoulos, I.; Cavazzini, G.; Doujak, E.; Hočevar, M.; Rudolf, P. The new role of sustainable hydropower in flexible energy systems and its technical evolution through innovation and digitalization. Renew. Energy 2024, 230, 120832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ascher, W. Rescuing responsible hydropower projects. Energy Policy 2021, 150, 112092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sishi, M.; Telukdarie, A. Adoption of Data-Driven Automation Techniques to Create Smart Key Performance Indicators for Business Optimization. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2025, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Malik, F.H.; Hussain, G.A.; Alsmadi, Y.M.S.; Haider, Z.M.; Mansoor, W.; Lehtonen, M. Integrating Energy Storage Technologies with Renewable Energy Sources: A Pathway Toward Sustainable Power Grids. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gitelman, L.; Kozhevnikov, M.; Visotskaya, Y. Diversification as a Method of Ensuring the Sustainability of Energy Supply within the Energy Transition. Resources 2023, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Karekezi, Y.C.; Maurer, F.; Robles, D.J.T.; Øyvang, T.; Nøland, J.K. Transforming Classical Hydropower Generation for Flexibility in the Global Energy Transition: Challenges, Requirements, and Prospects. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 74762–74780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Leguizamon-Perilla, A.; Rodriguez-Bernal, J.; Moralez-Cruz, L.; Farfán-Martinez, N.; Nieto-Londoño, C.; Vásquez, R.; Escudero-Atehortua, A. Digitalisation and Modernisation of Hydropower Operating Facilities to Support the Colombian Energy Mix Flexibility. Energies 2023, 16, 3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pepe, C.; Zanoli, S.M. Digitalization, Industry 4.0, Data, KPIs, Modelization and Forecast for Energy Production in Hydroelectric Power Plants: A Review. Energies 2024, 17, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Almeida, R.M.; Schmitt, R.J.; Castelletti, A.; Flecker, A.S.; Harou, J.J.; Heilpern, S.A.; Kittner, N.; Mathias Kondolf, G.; Opperman, J.J.; Shi, Q.; et al. Strategic planning of hydropower development: Balancing benefits and socioenvironmental costs. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2022, 56, 101175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- del Río, D.A.; Moffett, H.; Nieto-Londoño, C.; Vásquez, R.E.; Escudero-Atehortúa, A. Chivor’s Life Extension Project (CLEP): From Sediment Management to Development of a New Intake System. Water 2020, 12, 2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ertugrul, N. Reinventing the Power Grid: Renewable Energy, Storage, and Grid Modernization; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pessenlehner, S.; Liedermann, M.; Holzapfel, P.; Skrame, K.; Habersack, H.; Hauer, C. Evaluation of Hydropower Projects in Balkan Rivers Based on Direct Sediment Transport Measurements: Challenges, Limits and Possible Data Interpretation—Case study Vjosa River/Albania. River Res. Appl. 2022, 38, 1014–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Schleiss, A.J.; Franca, M.J.; Juez, C.; De Cesare, G. Reservoir sedimentation. J. Hydraul. Res. 2016, 54, 595–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gabl, R.; Gems, B.; Birkner, F.; Hofer, B.; Aufleger, M. Adaptation of an Existing Intake Structure Caused by Increased Sediment Level. Water 2018, 10, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Othman, M.E.F.; Sidek, L.M.; Basri, H.; El-Shafie, A.; Ahmed, A.N. Climate challenges for sustainable hydropower development and operational resilience: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 209, 115108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Patro, E.R.; De Michele, C.; Granata, G.; Biagini, C. Assessment of current reservoir sedimentation rate and storage capacity loss: An Italian overview. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 320, 115826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bacalhau, J.R.; Ribeiro Neto, A.; Crétaux, J.F.; Bergé-Nguyen, M.; Moreira, D.M. Bathymetry of reservoirs using altimetric data associated to optical images. Adv. Space Res. 2022, 69, 4098–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jian, X.; Chen, J. Real-time monitoring and early warning system for hydropower safety based on the internet of things. Intell. Decis. Technol. 2025, 19, 2295–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Prado, L.; Fonseca, M.; Bernardes, J.V.; Santos, M.G.; Bortoni, E.C.; Bastos, G.S. Forecast of Operational Downtime of the Generating Units for Sediment Cleaning in the Water Intakes: A Case of the Jirau Hydropower Plant. Energies 2023, 16, 6354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gacu, J.G.; Kantoush, S.A.; Nguyen, B.Q.; Solidum, R.U.; Balderama, O.F. Challenges and approaches in sediment management in the Philippines: A review of current research, practices, and proposed countermeasures. Nat. Hazards 2025, 121, 19527–19563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Faraco, R.L.; Barino, F.; Campos, D.; Sampaio, G.; Honório, L.; Marcato, A.; Bessa dos Santos, A.; dos Santos, C.C.; Hamaji, F. Hydroelectric Plant Safety: Real-Time Monitoring Utilizing Fiber-Optic Sensors. Sensors 2024, 24, 4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ramião, J.P.; Carvalho-Santos, C.; Pinto, R.; Pascoal, C. Hydropower Contribution to the Renewable Energy Transition Under Climate Change. Water Resour. Manag. 2022, 37, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tangi, M.; Bizzi, S.; Schmitt, R.; Castelletti, A. Balancing Sediment Connectivity and Energy Production via Optimized Reservoir Sediment Management Strategies. Water Resour. Res. 2023, 59, e2022WR034033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Amasi, A.; Wynants, M.; Blake, W.; Mtei, K. Drivers, Impacts and Mitigation of Increased Sedimentation in the Hydropower Reservoirs of East Africa. Land 2021, 10, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Castro, P.W.; Mantilla, C.A. Implementation of Strategies for the Management of Dams with Sedimented Reservoirs. Water Resour. Manag. 2021, 35, 4399–4413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Castro, P.W. Sediment management at the water intake of hydropower plants. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wahab, N.A.; Kamarudin, M.K.A.; Toriman, M.E.; Juahir, H.; Samah, M.A.A.; Azinuddin, M.; Saudi, A.S.M.; Hoe, L.I.; Saad, M.H.M.; Sunardi, S. The Assessment of Sedimentation Problems in Kenyir Hydropower Reservoir, Malaysia. Water 2023, 15, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Morris, G. Classification of Management Alternatives to Combat Reservoir Sedimentation. Water 2020, 12, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hilgert, S.; Sotiri, K.; Fuchs, S. Review of methods of sediment detection in reservoirs. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2023, 39, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sedláček, J.; Bábek, O.; Grygar, T.M.; Lenďáková, Z.; Pacina, J.; Štojdl, J.; Hošek, M.; Elznicová, J. A closer look at sedimentation processes in two dam reservoirs. J. Hydrol. 2022, 605, 127397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Golubkov, M.S.; Golubkov, S.M. Secchi Disk Depth or Turbidity, Which Is Better for Assessing Environmental Quality in Eutrophic Waters? A Case Study in a Shallow Hypereutrophic Reservoir. Water 2023, 16, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Matos, T.; Martins, M.; Henriques, R.; Goncalves, L. A review of methods and instruments to monitor turbidity and suspended sediment concentration. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 64, 105624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gacu, J.; Monjardin, C.; Mangulabnan, R.; Pugat, G.; Solmerin, J. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Surface Water Management: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications, and Challenges. Water 2025, 17, 1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chauhan, B.V.S.; Vedrtnam, A.; Wyche, K.P.; Verma, S. Review on Artificial Intelligence in the Environmental Monitoring. In Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in the Environment; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 29–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sotiri, K.; Hilgert, S.; Mannich, M.; Bleninger, T.; Fuchs, S. Implementation of comparative detection approaches for the accurate assessment of sediment thickness and sediment volume in the Passaúna Reservoir. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 287, 112298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sirabahenda, Z.; St-Hilaire, A.; Courtenay, S.C.; van den Heuvel, M.R. Comparison of Acoustic to Optical Backscatter Continuous Measurements of Suspended Sediment Concentrations and Their Characterization in an Agriculturally Impacted River. Water 2019, 11, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gaida, T.C.; Mohammadloo, T.H.; Snellen, M.; Simons, D.G. Mapping the Seabed and Shallow Subsurface with Multi-Frequency Multibeam Echosounders. Remote Sens. 2019, 12, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Santos, B.B.D.; Miranda, R.B.D.; Estigoni, M.V.; Villela, J.M.; Mauad, F.F. Evaluation of the laser diffraction method for the measurement of suspended sediment concentration in Mogi-Guaçu reservoir (São Paulo, Brazil). Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2018, 17, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Saranga, B.K.S.; Premarathne, U.S.; Atapattu, B.C.L. Stream Sediment Rate Estimation using Optical Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Industrial Electronics and Applications Conference (IEACon); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Duan, G.; Peng, Y. Flow and sediment measurement for the Three Gorges Project. River 2024, 3, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Gao, L. Sources and dynamics of suspended particulate matter in a large-river dominated marine system: Contributions from terrestrial sediments, biological particles, and flocculation. J. Mar. Syst. 2022, 225, 103648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, G.; Sun, H.; Liu, S.; Qiao, L.; Ma, Y.; Ding, D.; Wang, C. Evolution of Suspended Particles in the Autumnal North Yellow Sea: Grain-Size Distributions Measured by Laser In Situ Scattering and Transmissometry. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, Z.C.; Hsu, T.J.; Nguyen Ly, T. Field Observations on Flocculation of Suspended Sediment in Coastal Algal Reef Environments. In Proceedings of the European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 April–2 May 2025. EGU General Assembly 2025, Abstract EGU25-2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Weit, A.; Mourier, B.; Fretaud, T.; Winiarski, T. Combined usage of geophysical methods in continental water bodies, their benefits and challenging issues: A special focus on sediment deposits in dam reservoirs. J. Appl. Geophys. 2023, 213, 105036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Skarbøvik, E.; Gyritia Madsen van’t Veen, S.; Lannergård, E.E.; Wenng, H.; Stutter, M.; Bieroza, M.; Atcheson, K.; Jordan, P.; Fölster, J.; Mellander, P.E.; et al. Comparing in situ turbidity sensor measurements as a proxy for suspended sediments in North-Western European streams. CATENA 2023, 225, 107006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Drogkoula, M.; Kokkinos, K.; Samaras, N. A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Learning Methodologies with Emphasis in Water Resources Management. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Agrawal, Y.; Slade, W.; Pottsmith, C.; Dana, D. Technologies and Experience with Monitoring Sediments for Protecting Turbines from Abrasion. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2016, 49, 122005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lin, C.P.; Chung, C.C.; Wu, I.L.; Wu, P.L.; Lin, C.H.; Wu, C.H. Extensive Monitoring System of Sediment Transport for Reservoir Sediment Management. In Handbook of Environmental Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; Volume 17. [Google Scholar]
- Rai, A.K.; Kumar, A. Sediment Monitoring for Hydro-Abrasive Erosion: A Field Study from Himalayas, India. Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst. 2017, 10, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jansen, L. Sediment Management Strategies: Case Study on Hydropower Reservoirs in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dam Safety Management and Engineering; Water Resources Development and Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.; Niu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Li, Z.; Iftikhor, A. The Integrated Hydropower Sustainability Assessment in Tajikistan: A Case Study of Rogun Hydropower Plant. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8894072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Quaranta, E.; Bonjean, M.; Cuvato, D.; Nicolet, C.; Dreyer, M.; Gaspoz, A.; Rey-Mermet, S.; Bouillaut, B.; Pratalata, L.; Pinelli, M.; et al. Ecologically Improved Turbines, Hydropower in Existing Infrastructures, Hydropeaking Reduction, Digitalization and Governing Systems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Arora, N.; Kumar, A.; Singal, S.K. Assessment of Suspended Sediment Properties and Particle Load for Optimal Operation of Hydropower Plants in the Himalayan Region. In Recent Advances in Hydropower Engineering; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Giraldo, S.; la Rotta, D.; Nieto-Londoño, C.; Vásquez, R.E.; Escudero-Atehortúa, A. Digital Transformation of Energy Companies: A Colombian Case Study. Energies 2021, 14, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- del Río, D.A.; Caballero, J.A.; Muñoz, J.T.; Parra-Rodriguez, N.C.; Nieto-Londoño, C.; Vásquez, R.E.; Escudero-Atehortua, A. Design of a Self-Supporting Liner for the Renovation of a Headrace Tunnel at Chivor Hydropower Project. Water 2023, 15, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- del Río, D.A.; Moffett, H.; Nieto-Londoño, C.; Vásquez, R.E.; Escudero-Atehortúa, A. Extending Life Expectancy of La Esmeralda Reservoir: A Bet to Support Colombia’s Future Energy Demand. In Proceedings of the ASME 2020 Power Conference (POWER2020); American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- IEC 60034 Series; Rotating Electrical Machines. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2025.
- IEEE 421.1; Standard Definitions for Excitation Systems for Synchronous Machines. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020.







| Parameter | Average Value | Max. Value | Standard Deviation | Correlation (Pilot vs. Lab) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbidity (NTU) | 180 | 400 | 62 | 0.91 |
| Sediment Concentration (mg/L) | 420 | 850 | 130 | 0.93 |
| Temperature (°C) | 19.8 | 22.4 | 0.7 | - |
| Indicator | Value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| R2 | 0.9106 | High correlation; indicates that the pilot reproduces laboratory trends well |
| MAE | 10.9896 | Reduced mean absolute error, showing good accuracy |
| RMSE | 13.4389 | Low root mean square error, indicating good agreement |
| Bias | −1.7294 | Near-zero bias, with slight underestimation by the pilot |
| Standard deviation | 13.3385 | Low dispersion in errors, indicating stability |
| Pearson r | 0.9542 | Strong and consistent positive correlation |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Leguizamon-Perilla, A.; Caballero, J.A.; Rojas, L.; López-Cely, F.E.; Parra-Rodriguez, N.C.; Morales-Cruz, L.; Nieto-Londoño, C.; Silva-López, W.; Vásquez, R.E. Real-Time Sedimentation and Operational Technology Integration to Enhance Hydropower Operational Reliability: Case Study of the Chivor Hydropower Plant in Colombia. Energies 2026, 19, 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102481
Leguizamon-Perilla A, Caballero JA, Rojas L, López-Cely FE, Parra-Rodriguez NC, Morales-Cruz L, Nieto-Londoño C, Silva-López W, Vásquez RE. Real-Time Sedimentation and Operational Technology Integration to Enhance Hydropower Operational Reliability: Case Study of the Chivor Hydropower Plant in Colombia. Energies. 2026; 19(10):2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102481
Chicago/Turabian StyleLeguizamon-Perilla, Aldemar, Johann A. Caballero, Leonardo Rojas, Francisco E. López-Cely, Nhora Cecilia Parra-Rodriguez, Laidi Morales-Cruz, César Nieto-Londoño, Wilber Silva-López, and Rafael E. Vásquez. 2026. "Real-Time Sedimentation and Operational Technology Integration to Enhance Hydropower Operational Reliability: Case Study of the Chivor Hydropower Plant in Colombia" Energies 19, no. 10: 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102481
APA StyleLeguizamon-Perilla, A., Caballero, J. A., Rojas, L., López-Cely, F. E., Parra-Rodriguez, N. C., Morales-Cruz, L., Nieto-Londoño, C., Silva-López, W., & Vásquez, R. E. (2026). Real-Time Sedimentation and Operational Technology Integration to Enhance Hydropower Operational Reliability: Case Study of the Chivor Hydropower Plant in Colombia. Energies, 19(10), 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102481

