Next Article in Journal
Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition of GIS with Time–Frequency Energy Grayscale Maps and an Improved Variational Bayesian Autoencoder
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Economic Benefits of Gas–Wind–Solar Power Alliance Under Gas Peaking Mode
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Impact of Rear-Hanging String-Cable-Bundle Shading on Performance Parameters of Bifacial Photovoltaic Modules

by
Dan Smith
1,
Scott Rand
1,
Peter Hruby
1,
Ben De Fresart
1,
Paul Subzak
1,
Sai Tatapudi
2,
Nijanth Kothandapani
2 and
GovindaSamy TamizhMani
2,*
1
Affordable Wire Management, 1435 E University Drive, Tempe, AZ 85288, USA
2
Photovoltaic Reliability Laboratory, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2026, 19(1), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010126 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 November 2025 / Revised: 18 December 2025 / Accepted: 24 December 2025 / Published: 25 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section A2: Solar Energy and Photovoltaic Systems)

Abstract

The 2025 International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaics (ITRPV) projects that bifacial modules will dominate the photovoltaic (PV) market, reaching roughly 60–80% global share between 2024 and 2035, while monofacial PV modules will steadily decline. Current industry practice is to route the cable bundles along structural members such as main beams or torque tubes, thereby preventing rear-side shading but resulting in two key drawbacks: increased cable length and decreased system reliability due to cable proximity with rotating members and pinch points. Both effects contribute to higher system costs and reduced cable reliability. An alternative method involves suspending cable bundles directly behind the modules using hangers. While this approach mitigates excess length and risk of cable snags, it introduces the possibility of partial rear-side shading, which could possibly cause performance loss and hot-spot formation due to shade-induced electrical mismatch. Experimental evidence indicates that this risk is minimal, as albedo irradiance typically represents only 10–30% of front-side irradiance as reported in the literature and is largely diffuse, thereby limiting the likelihood of significant directional shading. This study evaluates the performance and reliability impacts of hanger-supported cable bundles under varying experimental conditions. Performance metrics assessed include maximum power output (Pmax), short-circuit current (Isc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), and fill factor (FF), while hot-spot risk was evaluated through measurements of module temperature uniformity using infrared imaging. Each cable (1X) was 6 AWG with a total outer diameter of approximately 9 mm. Experiments covered different cable bundle counts/sizes (2X, 6X, 16X), mounting configurations (fixed-tilt and single-axis tracker), and albedo conditions (snow-covered and snow-free ground). Measurements were conducted hourly on clear days between 8:00 and 16:00 from June to September 2025. The results consistently show that hanger-supported cable bundles have a negligible shading impact across all hours of the day and throughout the measurement period. This indicates that rear-side cable shading can be safely and practically disregarded in performance modeling and energy-yield assessments for the tested configurations, including fixed-tilt systems and single-axis trackers with or without torque tube shading and with various hanger sizes and cable-bundle counts. Therefore, hanging cables behind modules is a cost- and reliability-friendly, safe and recommended practice.
Keywords: bifacial PV modules; string cable; rear shading; current and voltage bifacial PV modules; string cable; rear shading; current and voltage

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smith, D.; Rand, S.; Hruby, P.; De Fresart, B.; Subzak, P.; Tatapudi, S.; Kothandapani, N.; TamizhMani, G. Impact of Rear-Hanging String-Cable-Bundle Shading on Performance Parameters of Bifacial Photovoltaic Modules. Energies 2026, 19, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010126

AMA Style

Smith D, Rand S, Hruby P, De Fresart B, Subzak P, Tatapudi S, Kothandapani N, TamizhMani G. Impact of Rear-Hanging String-Cable-Bundle Shading on Performance Parameters of Bifacial Photovoltaic Modules. Energies. 2026; 19(1):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smith, Dan, Scott Rand, Peter Hruby, Ben De Fresart, Paul Subzak, Sai Tatapudi, Nijanth Kothandapani, and GovindaSamy TamizhMani. 2026. "Impact of Rear-Hanging String-Cable-Bundle Shading on Performance Parameters of Bifacial Photovoltaic Modules" Energies 19, no. 1: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010126

APA Style

Smith, D., Rand, S., Hruby, P., De Fresart, B., Subzak, P., Tatapudi, S., Kothandapani, N., & TamizhMani, G. (2026). Impact of Rear-Hanging String-Cable-Bundle Shading on Performance Parameters of Bifacial Photovoltaic Modules. Energies, 19(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop