Next Article in Journal
High-Quality Heat Flow Determination from Coastal Areas of Fujian Province, China
Previous Article in Journal
Carbon Emission Prediction of Freeway Construction Phase Based on Back Propagation Neural Network Optimization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress on the Performance Enhancement Technology of Ice-on-Coil Energy Storage

1
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Key Laboratory of Long-Duration and Large-Scale Energy Storage (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Beijing 100190, China
4
College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
5
School of Instrument Science and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
6
School of Renewable Energy, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Ordos 017010, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(7), 1734; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071734
Submission received: 1 March 2025 / Revised: 20 March 2025 / Accepted: 24 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section D: Energy Storage and Application)

Abstract

:
Ice-on-coil energy storage technology has been widely used in air conditioning systems and industrial refrigeration as an efficient energy storage technology. This paper reviews the research progress of ice-on-coil energy storage technology, including its working principle, system design, key parameter optimization, and practical application challenges and solutions. Three kinds of ice melting systems are introduced. The internal ice melting system has the largest cold storage density and the slowest rate of ice melting. The external ice melting system has the lowest cold storage density and the fastest rate of ice melting. The combined ice melting system can have the highest density of cold storage density and a high rate of ice melting. By comparing the results of different studies, the influence of fin and thin ring application on the heat transfer enhancements of the ice-on-coil storage system is summarized. It is found that the ice storage time can be reduced by 21% and 34% when the annular fin and thin ring are set. Regarding system control, adopting the ice-melting priority strategy increases operating energy consumption, but the economy improves; using the unit priority strategy lowers operating energy consumption, but the economy suffers slightly. When the cooling demand exceeds the cooling capacity of the chiller, an ice melting priority control strategy is more economical. Some suggestions for future research are presented, such as optimizing the shape and arrangement of coil fins and ice storage systems integrated with renewable energy. It provides guidance for the further development of ice storage air conditioning technology.

1. Introduction

Energy storage technology is the key to solving the imbalance between energy supply and demand. It not only helps power grid peak regulation but also enhances the proportion of renewable energy consumption. As a crucial support for achieving the “dual carbon” goals, it has great significance for building a new power system [1,2,3]. Nowadays, the energy industry remains heavily reliant on coal and other fossil fuels as primary sources of energy. The demand for energy in the contemporary world is increasing, and the cost of fossil fuels is rising. Renewable energy sources offer the benefits of minimal environmental impact and sustainable utilization. This contributes to reducing global carbon emissions [4,5,6]. However, the volatility and uncertainty of renewable energy generation, influenced by weather conditions, pose significant challenges to grid integration and lead to frequent curtailment of wind and solar energy phenomena [7,8]. Given these challenges, relying solely on generation and grid-side regulation is insufficient to achieve high penetration of new energy into the grid [9]. There is an urgent need to develop new energy storage technologies on the user side. This will not only break through the current dilemma but also pave the way for a comprehensive energy system that integrates generation, transmission, load, and storage, and leverages the complementary use of multiple energy sources. In this context, user-side energy storage technology emerges as a key driver for the development of integrated energy systems [10,11].
In recent years, the global energy demand has surged dramatically, with an average annual growth rate of 2.4% [12]. Notably, the energy consumption of residential and office buildings accounts for about 40.0% [13,14], with the majority of this energy being consumed by air conditioning systems for indoor temperature regulation [15]. Given this significant energy footprint, the application of energy storage technology in air conditioning systems is of paramount importance for optimizing building energy supply [16,17]. As illustrated in Figure 1, integrating cold storage technology with air conditioning systems offers a strategic solution. During the valley period of the power grid or when there is an excess of wind and solar resources during the day, electricity can be used for cooling, and the generated cooling energy can be stored in the form of low-temperature water or ice [18]. When users need cooling, the stored cold energy can be directly supplied. This approach can effectively regulate the power load, increase the consumption of renewable energy, and reduce the dependence on traditional energy sources.
Cold storage technology can be divided into two types based on different storage methods, namely sensible heat storage and latent heat storage [19,20]. Sensible heat storage is the storage and release of heat without chemical changes. It relies on the thermophysical properties of the heat storage material to store and release heat. In this process, only the material’s temperature changes. Latent heat energy storage, also known as phase-change energy storage, mainly utilizes heat absorption or exothermic behavior during the phase change of materials to store or release thermal energy. It typically has a relatively high heat storage density and a small temperature change. Its storage capacity is 5–14 times higher than that of sensible heat storage [21], which is a widely considered energy storage technology at present.
Table 1 [22,23,24] lists the current typical cold storage methods and their technical features. Compared with water, eutectic salt [25], and gas hydrate storage [26], ice storage emerges as a superior option. It boasts several significant advantages such as higher energy storage density, better heat transfer performance, and a lower temperature of cold release. Moreover, ice storage facilitates the storage and transportation of cold and heat energy at an almost constant temperature [27,28]. While water storage offers better heat exchange performance and lower operational costs, its energy density is lower than that of ice storage. On the other hand, eutectic salt storage has higher operational costs and lower energy storage density, resulting in lower cost-effectiveness compared to ice storage. Additionally, although gas hydrate refrigeration boasts higher density and system efficiency, its operational and maintenance costs exceed those of ice refrigeration. These factors have contributed to the increasing attention that ice storage technology has garnered in recent years.
There are two main types of ice storage technologies, depending on the method of ice production. These are, namely, coil-type ice storage technology for static ice production [29] and ice slurry technology for dynamic ice production [30]. Although ice slurry cold storage technology is more advanced than coil ice storage technology, it requires higher control precision and involves more complex control mechanisms. The stability and reliability of the ice slurry ice storage system mostly depend on the self-control of the system’s capabilities. Table 2 lists several typical ice storage cases where ice-on-coil storage technology has been commercially applied on a large scale.
The review paper is structured as follows. First, we construct and analyze schematic diagrams to explore the operational modes and technical characteristics of internal ice melting, external ice melting, and combined internal and external ice melting. Then, we delve into the enhanced heat transfer mechanisms of ice-on-coil energy storage and summarize the principles of enhanced heat transfer under typical structural parameters, such as fins and thin rings. Adding fins and thin rings to the outside of the ice-on-coil energy storage not only enlarges the heat transfer area and improves the speed of ice formation but also ensures uniform ice thickness exterior of the tube during the ice storage process. Finally, we summarize the load distribution characteristics of three distinct operational modes, namely full capacity ice storage, unit priority cooling, and ice melting priority cooling in different periods. Additionally, in terms of operating strategies for ice storage systems, we compare and summarize the application scope and optimization conclusions of various strategies through diverse technical approaches, including mathematical modeling, software simulation, and model optimization.
At present, there are few studies on the integration of ice-on-coil energy storage with air conditioning technology, and the system analysis is not deep and specific enough. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current status and future directions of key aspects related to ice-on-coil energy storage technology. It analyzes and highlights the primary main problems and bottlenecks encountered when applying ice storage technology to air conditioning systems and provides ideas and solutions for optimizing ice storage air conditioning technology. The future research direction, including the development of new high-efficiency heat transfer materials and intelligent control systems, is proposed, which provides guidance for further research in this field. The purpose of this paper is to provide theoretical reference for the further research and development of ice coil cold storage technology, help realize the goal of “double carbon”, and serve the power grid peak regulation.

2. Research on Ice-on-Coil Type Ice Melting Methods

2.1. Ice-on-Coil Type Ice Melting Method

Ice-on-coil storage systems are classified into two types based on their ice-melting methods, namely internal ice melting and external ice melting [31]. The internal ice melting system is completely frozen, while the external ice melting system is incompletely frozen. The completely frozen system has a considerable amount of cold storage capacity, but the cooling temperature fluctuates significantly. Conversely, the incompletely frozen system has a smaller storage capacity, yet it maintains a more stable cooling temperature and achieves a faster cooling rate.

2.1.1. Internal Ice Melting Method

When the internal ice melting method is used for cooling, the high-temperature heat transfer fluid, which has been heated by the air conditioning load, circulates through the coil. The ice on the outside of the tube melts from the inside out to provide the cooling load [32]. Figure 2 illustrates the operational mechanism of the internal ice melting system. The system comprises a base load refrigerating machine, a dual-working-condition refrigerating machine, a heat exchanger, a coil, an ice storage tank, a cooling tower, and other pumps and valves [33,34].
During nighttime ice storage, the dual-working-condition refrigerating machine operates in ice-making mode. The valves V3 and V7 on the ethylene glycol circuit side are closed, while V1 and V4 are open. Cooled by the dual-working-condition refrigerating machine, the ethylene glycol solution flows into the coil. The temperature of the supply water is maintained at 10.5 °C, whereas the return water temperature is kept at 3.5 °C. It indirectly exchanges heat with the cold water in the ice storage tank (10.0–15.0 °C) to freeze the water completely or partially.
During daytime ice melting, the water in the ice storage tank remains static. On the glycol circuit side, valve V3 is closed, while valves V1, V4, and V7 are open. The dual-working-condition refrigerating machine operates in ice-melting mode. The ethylene glycol pump drives the solution through the coil. The ice in the ice storage tank gradually melts with the continuous flow of glycol solution. In this process, the latent heat of water fusion is released and transmitted to the user side through the heat exchanger, which provides heat energy to the chilled water supply system. This maintains the supply water temperature at 5.0 °C and the return water temperature at 15.0 °C.
The ice storage capacity of the internal melting system is large, but its cooling rate is relatively slow. This limitation stems from its reliance on the forced flow of glycol solution within the coil to indirectly exchange heat with the ice and water outside the tube. The heat transfer on the outside of the tube depends on the thermal conductivity of the ice and the natural convection of the water. Both of these mechanisms exhibit poor heat transfer performance and are challenging to enhance further [35,36].

2.1.2. External Ice Melting Method

Unlike internal ice melting, external ice melting occurs in the opposite direction: the ice on the coil surface gradually melts from the outside inward, which is referred to as external ice melting [37]. Figure 3 shows a typical external ice melting system. Although the equipment components of this system are similar to those of the internal ice melting system, the piping connections are different.
When ice is stored at night, the dual-working-condition refrigerating machine operates in ice-making mode, the valve V3 on the glycol circuit side is closed, while V1 and V4 are open. The dual-working-condition refrigerating machine cools the ethylene glycol solution, which flows through the coil. The supply and return temperatures are −5.6 °C and −2.5 °C, respectively. It indirectly exchanges heat with the water in the ice storage tank at a temperature between 10.0 °C and 15.0 °C. Over time, this process gradually forms an ice layer with a thickness of 20.0 mm to 30.0 mm on the outer surface of the tube. Since the cold water in the ice storage tank is not completely frozen, it is necessary to prevent the formation of ice bridges between the coils.
During the day when the ice melts, the dual-working-condition refrigerating machine stops running, while the valves of V5 and V6 are opened. The system circulation cold water pump draws unfrozen cold water from the ice storage tank and directly delivers it to the user to provide cooling. The supply water temperature is 2.0 °C, while the return water temperature is 12.0 °C. During the operation of the external ice melting system, the cold water in the ice storage tank directly contacts the ice on the coil. This contact mode facilitates the forced convection heat transfer process, which significantly increases the cooling capacity of the system. However, the system is not completely frozen, and its cold storage capacity is lower than that of the internal ice melting system.

2.1.3. Combined Internal and External Ice Melting Methods

Figure 4 illustrates a combined internal and external ice melting system, which shares the same equipment composition as the individual internal and external ice melting systems. The ice storage process in this combined system is identical to that of the external ice melting method. In the ice-melting process, the glycol solution circulates inside the coil and gradually melts the ice on the outside of the coil. Concurrently, the return water from the air conditioning system also circulates the exterior of the coil, which facilitates the melting of the external ice layer from the outer surface inward. This dual-action approach significantly enhances the system’s cooling rate. The melting rate achieved by the combined method surpasses that of the external or internal ice melting method alone. This improvement addresses the issue of ice bridging in the external ice melting system and improves the overall ice storage capacity.
Summarizing the three ice storage methods, the following conclusions can be drawn:
① Internal ice melting systems have a higher storage capacity than external ice-melting systems;
② External ice melting systems provide lower water temperatures and lower pump consumption;
③ The combined internal and external ice-melting system can optimize ice storage capacity by eliminating the constraints posed by ice bridge formation. However, this system demands more sophisticated switching and control mechanisms, and the pump requires a higher energy input during operation.
In the future, the external ice-melting process can be optimized by adjusting the flow direction and flow rate of the water distributor. This will lead to a more uniform temperature distribution within the ice storage tank and reduce the energy consumption of the pump during operation

3. Research on Enhanced Heat Transfer of Ice-on-Coil

In the ice-on-coil energy storage system, the heat transfer inside the coil includes the forced convection between the ethylene glycol solution and the coil and the heat conduction through the tube wall. Outside the coil, the heat transfer mechanisms include heat conduction between the coil and the ice and natural convection between the ice and the surrounding water. Figure 5 illustrates the heat transfer process of the ice storage unit and its thermal resistance model. With the thermal resistance model, the total heat transfer coefficient of the ice-on-coil energy storage process can be obtained with the equation [38].
1 kA = 1 A tube , i h H T F + ln D t u b e , o D t u b e , i 2 π L t u b e λ t u b e + ln D i c e D t u b e , o 2 π L t u b e λ i c e + 1 A ice h water ,
where k is the total heat transfer coefficient, W/(m2·K); A is the total heat transfer area, m2; A t u b e , i is the inner surface area of the tube wall, m2; h H T F is the forced convection heat transfer coefficient of heat transfer fluid in the tube, W/(m2·K); D t u b e , o and D t u b e , i are the inner and outer diameter of the tube, respectively, m; L t u b e is the length of the tube, m; λ t u b e is the thermal conductivity of the tube wall, W/(m·K); D i c e is the diameter of the ice layer formed outside the tube, m; λ i c e is the thermal conductivity of the ice layer, W/(m·K); A i c e is the area of the ice layer formed outside the tube, m2; h w a t e r is the convection heat transfer coefficient of water, W/(m2·K).
Ice has relatively low thermal conductivity compared to materials commonly used for coils; for example the thermal conductivity of carbon steel is generally 45~50 W/(m·K), while the thermal conductivity of ice is 2.2 W/(m·K).
R t u b e = ln D t u b e , o D tube , i 2 π λ t u b e ,
R i c e = ln D Ice D tube , o 2 π λ i c e ,
where R t u b e is the thermal conductivity resistance of the ice coil, K/W; R i c e is the heat conduction resistance of ice, K/W.
Taking an ice coil with a tube diameter of 20 mm and a tube wall thickness of 1 mm as an example, before the formation of ice layer, R t u b e is 0.00037 K/W, when the ice thickness is 1 mm, R i c e is 0.0069 K/W, and when the ice thickness is 10 mm, R i c e is 0.0501 K/W. It is obvious that in the process of ice storage, the thermal conductivity resistance of ice is significantly greater than that of ice coil, which becomes the bottleneck affecting the ice storage process. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt appropriate enhanced heat transfer methods.
Enhancing the heat transfer performance of ice storage can be achieved through various methods, such as utilizing extended heat transfer surfaces or increasing the thermal conductivity of phase change materials [39,40]. Xu et al. [41] discovered that once the thermal conductivity of the coil material exceeds that of ice, further increasing the coil material’s thermal conductivity has minimal impact on the ice formation time. Consequently, this paper primarily focuses on summarizing the influence of fin addition on the icing and melting times of the ice storage system.
However, adding fins also reduces the volume of the cold storage working medium within the same volume of the ice storage tank, which decreases the ice storage capacity [42,43]. There is an optimal number of fins and width. Beyond these two parameters, the heat transfer performance will not be further enhanced [44,45]. Implementing thin ring connections between the coils can improve temperature distribution and enhance heat transfer efficiency. Increasing the thermal conductivity and area of thin rings can significantly improve the ice storage rate [46]. Specifically, compared to smooth tubes, using annular fins can reduce ice storage time by 21%, while thin rings can reduce ice storage time by 34% [47]. Furthermore, the staggered arrangement of thin rings outperforms the parallel arrangement in terms of ice storage efficiency [48]. The primary findings of various enhanced heat transfer studies are summarized in Table 3.
It is crucial to highlight that ice storage systems must consider both the ice storage and melting processes. Although the enhanced heat transfer by increasing the heat transfer area can shorten the ice storage time, it reduces the volume of ice produced in the ice storage tank and makes it easier to form ice bridges between the coils, which affects the melting efficiency of the external ice melting system. Therefore, considering the characteristics of the solidification and melting process of the coil, future research will focus on further optimizing the shape and arrangement of the coil fin to enhance its heat transfer performance. Additionally, future studies should also consider the economic and environmental impacts of reducing the melting time of ice storage systems.

4. Research on Operation Strategy of the Ice Storage System

The ice storage air conditioning system is more complicated than the conventional one. To cut operating costs, it is vital to reasonably control the amount of ice stored while the system is running. The amount of ice stored is closely related to the amount of cooling released the next day. Hence, the corresponding strategy must be formulated based on the predicted cooling load to allocate the proportion of the ice storage tank and the main chiller’s cooling output. Implementing these optimization strategies can reduce the system’s annual operating costs by over 30% [59].
Ice storage systems can be classified into two types based on their cooling modes, namely full and partial ice storage [60]. Full ice storage utilizes off-peak electric power to produce ice at night. It completely relies on ice melting during the daytime to meet the user’s cooling demands. Partial ice storage utilizes chiller units and ice-melting cooling loads simultaneously during the daytime.
When using the full ice storage mode, the air conditioning’s cooling load is entirely fulfilled by the latent heat released from melting ice. The mode can maximize the realization of the system’s “Load-Shifting” effect, as shown in Figure 6. However, this mode necessitates substantial storage capacity, extensive space, and high investment cost. It is particularly suitable for buildings with relatively concentrated cooling time, such as data centers, industrial plants, shopping malls, etc.
Partial ice storage is divided into two modes, namely unit priority and ice melting priority. As shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, the unit priority requires a smaller ice storage tank capacity, but the operation cost is high. The ice melting priority mode has lower operating costs but a larger ice storage tank capacity. In practical engineering applications, according to different cooling demands, the amount of ice storage and the cooling loads of units can be reasonably controlled.
Table 4 summarizes the technical approaches and main conclusions of different control strategies. The ice melting priority strategy, despite its higher operating energy consumption, demonstrates better economic performance. Conversely, using the unit priority strategy, the operation’s energy consumption is low, but the economy is slightly worse. When the required cooling capacity exceeds the capacity of the unit, the ice melting priority control strategy is more cost-effective. The ice storage cooling system can also be integrated with renewable energy generation systems, such as wind and solar photovoltaic, to reduce the dependence on grid power [61]. This integrated system can mitigate the volatility and intermittency of renewable energy and promote the use of solar and wind power. This achieves a green, energy-saving, and low-cost cooling supply solution.
The operating parameters of the ice storage air conditioning system have significant influence on the system performance. Reducing the carrier coolant’s inlet temperature can improve the heat transfer efficiency of the ice storage coil as well as the ice formation rate [85]. However, a lower inlet temperature of the carrier coolant may reduce the chiller unit’s coefficient of performance (COP). Increasing the carrier coolant flow rate can shorten the ice storage and melting time [86,87]. Furthermore, the longer the coil tube, the more uneven the ice thickness [88]. Several parameters, including the initial inlet temperature, mass flow rate, and the structure and arrangement of the coil tubes, will significantly influence the ice storage process of the system [89,90,91,92,93].
In the future development of the ice storage system, mathematical modeling and software analysis methods will be employed to predict the user side of the required cold load while calculating the ice storage system in different periods of ice storage and ice melting rate. This approach can facilitate the establishment of a feedback loop between cold storage systems and user demand. The system determines whether it is necessary to adjust the cooling capacity based on the cooling demand. Additionally, wind, solar, and other renewable energy generation systems are integrated into the ice storage energy supply system to establish a balanced energy supply and demand relationship in the process of ice storage and ice melting. By incorporating the power output, node voltage, and cooling demand of the chiller into the control system, the volatility and intermittency of renewable energy sources can be effectively mitigated. Furthermore, the control system can adjust the output power in time, ensuring the stable and efficient operation of the ice storage system. This method enables the efficient use of renewable energy and provides users with low-cost cooling capacity.
In summary, the control strategy of ice storage air conditioning systems can be developed and optimized from four aspects, namely storage capacity, operating cost, operating energy consumption and external factors. Studies have identified and compared various operating modes, such as full-capacity ice storage, unit priority cooling, and ice melt priority cooling. This helps us understand which models are most effective under different conditions. By optimizing the operational strategy of the ice storage system, it is possible to significantly improve its coefficient of performance (COP) and reduce energy consumption, thereby reducing operating costs. The study of operation strategy can realize the accurate adjustment of the building cooling load and rationally arrange the ice preparation and melting process according to the cooling load demand in different time periods. Furthermore, it can improve the response speed and flexibility of the system. With the development of the Internet of Things and intelligent control technology, it can be applied to the research of the operation strategy of the ice storage system, which can realize more intelligent and automated management.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

In this paper, the operating principle of the ice storage system is demonstrated, and the problems of the slow rate of generating ice layer and low density of cold storage in the current system are deeply analyzed. However, the current research also has some limitations. For example, the research on heat transfer enhancement in ice storage systems is extensive, but much theoretical work has focused on the solidification process of ice storage systems. Therefore, more investigations are required on ice melting in the presence of various simple and hybrid heat transfer enhancement techniques. This paper analyzes and summarizes the key technology research achievements and existing problems of coil-type ice storage air conditioning.
(1) During the freezing process of water, the total thermal resistance increases as the ice layer thickens. When the ice thickness reaches a critical point, its thermal resistance becomes the dominant factor influencing the ice formation time. Meanwhile, the proportion of the coil tube material’s thermal resistance in the total thermal resistance gradually decreases. Consequently, it is unnecessary to excessively enhance the thermal conductivity of the coil tube material. It has been observed that when the thermal conductivity of the polymer coil material reaches 2.2 W/(m·K), the ice storage and melting rates approach those of metal coils.
(2) When thin rings are installed outside the coil tube, the ice storage rate is better than adding fins or smooth tubes outside the coil, which significantly improves the heat transfer performance, and the enhancement of ice melting and ice storage rate can reach 34%. However, it is necessary to avoid the formation of ice bridges, as they affect the speed of ice melting and cooling.
(3) External ice melting releases cold energy with greater flexibility and faster cooling rates. Internal ice melting has a greater storage capacity. Future research should focus on the system design and operation control of combining internal and external ice melting to realize the two-way improvement of the cold storage capacity and cooling rate.
(4) The control strategy for the ice storage air-conditioning system should be formulated and optimized by considering the following four aspects: cold storage capacity, operating costs, energy consumption, and external factors. (i) In the optimization of the amount of cold storage, by simulating and comparing different models of cold storage and selecting the control scheme that can achieve the maximum amount of ice storage within a certain cost range, the load in the peak period can be reduced by 50%. (ii) By adapting the control system and building predictive models, it is possible to minimize operating expenses and save 5% to 30% of operating costs. (iii) Different algorithms and mathematical models are used to predict and analyze the system energy consumption, which helps to reduce the peak load and carbon dioxide emission. Future research could consider combining weather forecasting, load forecasting, and operation strategies to optimize operational strategies dynamically, thereby achieving more substantial reductions in operation costs. (iv) Combining the ice storage system with renewable energy generation systems, such as wind power and photovoltaic power, can effectively mitigate the volatility and intermittency of renewable energy sources and promote their consumption.
By expanding the heat transfer surface of the coil tube, adopting a combination of internal and external ice melting methods, and optimizing the operation strategy, it can simultaneously achieve the improvement of ice storage and melting rate, energy storage density, and economic performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.G. and C.C.; methodology, X.X.; software, X.G.; validation, X.G., C.C. and Z.W.; formal analysis, Z.C.; investigation, C.C.; resources, X.X.; data curation, X.X.; writing—original draft preparation, X.X.; writing—review and editing, X.G.; visualization, X.X.; supervision, C.C.; project administration, C.C.; funding acquisition, C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52476226).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xie, H.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, D.; Goh, H.H.; Ahmad, T.; Liu, H.; Wu, T. IntelliSense technology in the new power systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 177, 113229. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, Z.; Deusen, D. Role of energy storage technologies in enhancing grid stability and reducing fossil fuel dependency. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 102, 1055–1074. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pata, S.K.; Pata, U.K.; Wang, Q. Ecological power of energy storage, clean fuel innovation, and energy-related research and development technologies. Renew. Energy 2025, 241, 122377. [Google Scholar]
  4. Erdogan, S.; Pata, U.K.; Solarin, S.A. Towards carbon-neutral world: The effect of renewable energy investments and technologies in G7 countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 186, 113683. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmad, E.; Khan, D.; Anser, M.K.; Nassani, A.A.; Hassan, S.A.; Zaman, K. The Influence of Grid connectivity, Electricity Pricing, Policy-driven Power Incentives, and Carbon Emissions on Renewable Energy Adoption: Exploring Key Factors. Renew. Energy 2024, 232, 121108. [Google Scholar]
  6. Serat, Z. Optimizing renewable energy systems for 100% clean energy target: A comparative study of solar, hydro, pumped hydro, and battery storage technologies. J. Energy Storage 2024, 104, 114441. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang, M.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Su, X. Data-driven robust optimization scheduling for microgrid day-ahead to intra-day operations based on renewable energy interval prediction. Energy 2024, 313, 134058. [Google Scholar]
  8. Heine, K.; Tabares-Velasco, P.C.; Deru, M. Energy and cost assessment of packaged ice energy storage implementations using OpenStudio Measures. Energy Build. 2021, 248, 111189. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yuan, Z.; Guo, P.; Liu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, Z. Review on control and protection for renewable energy integration through VSC-HVDC. High Volt. Eng. 2020, 46, 1460–1475. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang, H.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, D. Demand response strategy of user-side energy storage system and its application to reliability improvement. J. Energy Storage 2024, 92, 112150. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ren, H.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Li, Q.; Yang, Y. Integrated optimization of a regional integrated energy system with thermal energy storage considering both resilience and reliability. Energy 2022, 261, 125333. [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo, W.; Kong, F.; Shen, M.; Tong, L.; Jin, Y.; Feng, W.; Ding, Y. A novel liquid natural gas combined cycle system integrated with liquid nitrogen energy storage and carbon capture for replacing coal-fired power plants: System modelling and 3E analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 298, 117755. [Google Scholar]
  13. Miri, S.M.; Farzaneh-Gord, M.; Kianifar, A. Evaluating the dynamic behaviour of wind-powered compression refrigeration cycle integrated with an ice-storage tank for air conditioning application. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 269, 116093. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wenninger, S.; Kaymakci, C.; Wiethe, C. Explainable long-term building energy consumption prediction using QLattice. Appl. Energy 2022, 308, 118300. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lyu, J.; Shi, Y.; Du, H.; Lian, Z. Sex-based thermal comfort zones and energy savings in spaces with joint operation of air conditioner and fan. Build. Environ. 2023, 246, 111002. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gao, M.; Han, Z.; Zhang, C.; Li, P.; Wu, D. Optimal configuration for regional integrated energy systems with multi-element hybrid energy storage. Energy 2023, 277, 127672. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ye, A.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, T.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. Flexible energy utilization potential of demand response oriented photovoltaic direct-driven air-conditioning system with energy storage. Energy Build. 2024, 323, 114818. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xia, T.; Ji, J.; Ke, W. Case study of variable speed photovoltaic direct-driven ice-storage air conditioning system in Wuhu. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2024, 248, 122896. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Hassanien, R.H.E.; Wang, Y.; Tang, R.; Zhang, Y. Fabrication of shape-stable glycine water-based phase-change material using modified expanded graphite for cold energy storage. Energy 2024, 290, 130306. [Google Scholar]
  20. Reboli, T.; Ferrando, M.; Traverso, A.; Chiu, J.N. Thermal energy storage based on cold phase change materials: Charge phase assessment. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022, 217, 119177. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wei, G.; Wang, G.; Xu, C.; Ju, X.; Xing, L.; Du, X.; Yang, Y. Selection principles and thermophysical properties of high temperature phase change materials for thermal energy storage: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1771–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rismanchi, B.; Saidur, R.; BoroumandJazi, G.; Ahmed, S. Energy, exergy and environmental analysis of cold thermal energy storage (CTES) systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 5741–5746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hasnain, S.M. Review on sustainable thermal energy storage technologies, Part II: Cool thermal storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 1998, 39, 1139–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kang, Z.; Wang, R.; Zhou, X.; Feng, G. Research status of ice-storage air-conditioning system. Procedia Eng. 2017, 2, 1741–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, Z.; Wang, S.; Ying, H.; Liu, B.; Jia, W.; Xie, J.; Sun, Y. Preparation and thermal properties of eutectic phase change materials (EPCMs) with nanographite addition for cold thermal energy storage. Energy 2024, 290, 130148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cheng, C.; Wang, F.; Tian, Y.; Wu, X.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J. Review and prospects of hydrate cold storage technology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 117, 109492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yau, Y.H.; Rismanchi, B. A review on cool thermal storage technologies and operating strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 787–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ajarostaghi, S.S.M.; Poncet, S.; Sedighi, K.; Amiri, L. Solidification analysis in an ice-on-coil ice storage system: Experimental and numerical approaches. J. Energy Storage 2023, 65, 107291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mousavi Ajarostaghi, S.S.; Poncet, S.; Sedighi, K.; Aghajani Delavar, M. Numerical modeling of the melting process in a shell and coil tube ice storage system for air-conditioning application. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, Z.; Zhang, G.; Lu, W.; Luo, M.; Wu, Z. Review on high ice packing factor (IPF) ice slurry: Fabrication, characterization, flow characteristics and applications. J. Energy Storage 2024, 81, 110378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Z.; Chen, H. A numerical simulation and analysis of the discharge characteristics and heat transfer performance during the ice-storage system. J. Energy Storage 2023, 68, 107623. [Google Scholar]
  32. López-Navarro, A.; Biosca-Taronger, J.; Torregrosa-Jaime, B.; Corberán, J.M.; Bote-García, J.L.; Payá, J. Experimental investigations on the influence of ice floating in an internal melt ice-on-coil tank. Energy Build. 2013, 57, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  33. Siahtiri, M.; Jannesari, H.; Chini, S.F. Polytetrafluoroethylene coating effects on the ice formation rate over the submerged tubes with various materials and roughness: An experimental study. J. Energy Storage 2024, 85, 111081. [Google Scholar]
  34. Toffoletti, G.; Cortella, G.; D’Agaro, P. Thermodynamic and economic seasonal analysis of a transcritical CO2 supermarket with HVAC supply through ice thermal energy storage (ITES). Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 434, 139832. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, H.; Hu, C.; He, Y.; Tang, D.; Wang, K. Influence of fin parameters on the melting behavior in a horizontal shell-and-tube latent heat storage unit with longitudinal fins. J. Energy Storage 2021, 34, 102230. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Yang, X. Experimental investigation of discharge performance and temperature distribution of an external melt ice-on-coil ice-storage tank. HVACR Res. 2003, 9, 291–308. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chang, C.; Xu, X.; Guo, X.; Rasakhodzhaev, B.; Zhao, M.; Yuan, G. Experimental and numerical study of ice storage and melting process of external melting coil. J. Energy Storage 2024, 77, 109961. [Google Scholar]
  38. Aljuneidi, N.; Heine, K.; Rodriguez, R.M.; Boetcher, S.K.S. Ice thermal energy storage modeling: A review. Adv. Heat Transf. 2024, 58, 155–206. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, Y.T.; Chien, L.H.; Cheung, F.B.; Yang, A.S. Numerical and experimental investigations on melting heat transfer performance of PCM in finned cold thermal energy storage. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2023, 210, 124199. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Zou, S.; Xu, X.; Tu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Ke, Z. Enhancing the phase change material based shell-tube thermal energy storage units with unique hybrid fins. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2024, 157, 107763. [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu, X.; Chang, C.; Guo, X.; Zhao, M. Experimental and Numerical Study of the Ice Storage Process and Material Properties of Ice Storage Coils. Energies 2023, 16, 5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hamzeh, H.A.; Miansari, M. Numerical study of tube arrangement and fin effects on improving the ice formation in ice-on-coil thermal storage systems. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 113, 104520. [Google Scholar]
  43. Talukdar, S.; Afroz, H.M.M.; Hossain, M.A.; Aziz, M.A.; Hossain, M.M. Heat transfer enhancement of charging and discharging of phase change materials and size optimization of a latent thermal energy storage system for solar cold storage application. J. Energy Storage 2019, 24, 100797. [Google Scholar]
  44. Nóbrega, C.R.; Ismail, K.A.; Lino, F.A. Enhancement of ice formation around vertical finned tubes for cold storage applications. Int. J. Refrig. 2019, 99, 251–263. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nóbrega, C.R.; Ismail, K.A.; Lino, F.A. Solidification around axial finned tube submersed in PCM: Modeling and experiments. J. Energy Storage 2020, 29, 101438. [Google Scholar]
  46. Xie, J.; Yuan, C. Parametric study of ice thermal storage system with thin layer ring by Taguchi method. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 98, 246–255. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jannesari, H.; Abdollahi, N. Experimental and numerical study of thin ring and annular fin effects on improving the ice formation in ice-on-coil thermal storage systems. Appl. Energy 2017, 189, 369–384. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xie, J.; Yuan, C. Numerical study of thin layer ring on improving the ice formation of building thermal storage system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 69, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  49. Huang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Yao, F.; Zhang, C. Performance optimization of a finned shell-and-tube ice storage unit. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 167, 114788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Z.; Wu, Z.G. Analysis of HTFs, PCMs and fins effects on the thermal performance of shell–tube thermal energy storage units. Sol. Energy 2015, 122, 382–395. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hosseinzadeh, K.; Alizadeh, M.; Tavakoli, M.H.; Ganji, D.D. Investigation of phase change material solidification process in a LHTESS in the presence of fins with variable thickness and hybrid nanoparticles. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 152, 706–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tay, N.H.S.; Bruno, F.; Belusko, M. Comparison of pinned and finned tubes in a phase change thermal energy storage system using CFD. Appl. Energy 2013, 104, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sciacovelli, A.; Gagliardi, F.; Verda, V. Maximization of performance of a PCM latent heat storage system with innovative fins. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sheikholeslami, M.; Haq, R.U.; Shafee, A.; Li, Z.; Elaraki, Y.G.; Tlili, I. Heat transfer simulation of heat storage unit with nanoparticles and fins through a heat exchanger. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 135, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hajizadeh, M.R.; Keshteli, A.N.; Bach, Q.V. Solidification of PCM within a tank with longitudinal-Y shape fins and CuO nanoparticle. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 317, 114188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alizadeh, M.; Hosseinzadeh, K.; Shahavi, M.H.; Ganji, D.D. Solidification acceleration in a triplex-tube latent heat thermal energy storage system using V-shaped fin and nano-enhanced phase change material. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 163, 114436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Guo, H.; Tian, M. Enhancing the energy discharging performance by novel V-shaped branch fins in a triple-tube latent heat storage unit. J. Energy Storage 2024, 96, 112757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Johnson, M.; Vogel, J.; Hempel, M.; Hachmann, B.; Dengel, A. Design of high temperature thermal energy storage for high power levels. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 35, 758–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Karim, M.A.; Hasan, M.M.; Khan, M.I.H. A simplistic and efficient method of estimating air-conditioning load of commercial buildings in the sub-tropical climate. Energy Build. 2019, 203, 109396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shaibani, A.R.; Keshtkar, M.M.; Sardari, P.T. Thermo-economic analysis of a cold storage system in full and partial modes with two different scenarios: A case study. J. Energy Storage 2019, 24, 100783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Odufuwa, O.Y.; Kusakana, K.; Numbi, B.P.; Tartibu, L.K. Optimal energy management of grid-connected PV for HVAC cooling with ice thermal storage system. J. Energy Storage 2024, 77, 109844. [Google Scholar]
  62. Song, X.; Zhu, T.; Liu, L.; Cao, Z. Study on optimal ice storage capacity of ice thermal storage system and its influence factors. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 164, 288–300. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sun, Y.; Wang, S.; Xiao, F.; Gao, D. Peak load shifting control using different cold thermal energy storage facilities in commercial buildings: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 71, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cui, B.; Gao, D.C.; Xiao, F.; Wang, S. Model-based optimal design of active cool thermal energy storage for maximal life-cycle cost saving from demand management in commercial buildings. Appl. Energy 2017, 201, 382–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cui, B.; Wang, S.; Sun, Y. Life-cycle cost benefit analysis and optimal design of small scale active storage system for building demand limiting. Energy 2014, 73, 787–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thiem, S.; Born, A.; Danov, V.; Vandersickel, A.; Schäfer, J.; Hamacher, T. Automated identification of a complex storage model and hardware implementation of a model-predictive controller for a cooling system with ice storage. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 121, 922–940. [Google Scholar]
  67. Chen, H.J.; Wang, D.W.; Chen, S.L. Optimization of an ice-storage air conditioning system using dynamic programming method. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2005, 25, 461–472. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lu, Y.; Wang, S.; Sun, Y.; Yan, C. Optimal scheduling of buildings with energy generation and thermal energy storage under dynamic electricity pricing using mixed-integer nonlinear programming. Appl. Energy 2015, 147, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sait, H.H. Experimental study of water solidification phenomenon for ice-on-coil thermal energy storage application utilizing falling film. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 146, 135–145. [Google Scholar]
  70. Morgan, S. Experimental Analysis of Optimal Control of Passive and Active Building Thermal Storage Inventory. Master’s Thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  71. Habeebullah, B.A. Economic feasibility of thermal energy storage systems. Energy Build. 2007, 39, 355–363. [Google Scholar]
  72. Henze, G.P.; Felsmann, C.; Knabe, G. Evaluation of optimal control for active and passive building thermal storage. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2004, 43, 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  73. Sakamoto, Y.; Nagaiwa, A.; Kobayasi, S.; Shinozaki, T. An optimization method of district heating and cooling plant operation based on genetic algorithm. ASHRAE Trans. 1999, 105, 104. [Google Scholar]
  74. Cox, S.J.; Kim, D.; Cho, H.; Mago, P. Real time optimal control of district cooling system with thermal energy storage using neural networks. Appl. Energy 2019, 238, 466–480. [Google Scholar]
  75. Braun, J.E. A comparison of chiller-priority, storage-priority, and optimal control of an ice-storage system. Ashrae Trans. 1992, 98, 893–902. [Google Scholar]
  76. Candanedo, J.A.; Dehkordi, V.R.; Stylianou, M. Model-based predictive control of an ice storage device in a building cooling system. Appl. Energy 2013, 111, 1032–1045. [Google Scholar]
  77. Lee, W.S.; Chen, Y.T.; Wu, T.H. Optimization for ice-storage air-conditioning system using particle swarm algorithm. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 1589–1595. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ashok, S.; Banerjee, R. Optimal cool storage capacity for load management. Energy 2003, 28, 115–126. [Google Scholar]
  79. Gao, J.; Kang, J.; Zhang, C.; Gang, W. Energy performance and operation characteristics of distributed energy systems with district cooling systems in subtropical areas under different control strategies. Energy 2018, 153, 849–860. [Google Scholar]
  80. Garnier, A.; Eynard, J.; Caussanel, M.; Grieu, S. Predictive control of multizone heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems in non-residential buildings. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, 37, 847–862. [Google Scholar]
  81. Chaichana, C.; Charters, W.W.; Aye, L. An ice thermal storage computer model. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2001, 21, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sameti, M.; Haghighat, F. Hybrid solar and heat-driven district cooling system: Optimal integration and control strategy. Sol. Energy 2019, 183, 260–275. [Google Scholar]
  83. Dovrtel, K.; Medved, S. Weather-predicted control of building free cooling system. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3088–3096. [Google Scholar]
  84. Shin, M.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.; Song, A.; Kim, H.Y. Development of an HVAC system control method using weather forecasting data with deep reinforcement learning algorithms. Build. Environ. 2024, 248, 111069. [Google Scholar]
  85. Yang, T.; Sun, Q.; Wennersten, R. The impact of refrigerant inlet temperature on the ice storage process in an ice-on-coil storage plate. Energy Procedia 2018, 145, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  86. Yan, W.M.; Huang, C.Y.; Gao, K.E.; Amani, M.; Chien, L.H.; Homayooni, A. Study on the performance enhancement of ice storage and melting processes in an ice-on-coil thermal energy storage system. J. Energy Storage 2023, 72, 108410. [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, H.; Li, G.; Zhang, J. Experimental study on the influence of gas-blowing flow rate on the cold discharge characteristics of external ice-melting ice storage system. Renew. Energy 2024, 230, 120864. [Google Scholar]
  88. Tay, N.H.S.; Bruno, F.; Belusko, M. Experimental validation of a CFD model for tubes in a phase change thermal energy storage system. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2012, 55, 574–585. [Google Scholar]
  89. Abdelrahman, H.E.; Refaey, H.A.; Alotaibi, A.; Abdel-Aziz, A.A.; Abd Rabbo, M.F. Experimental investigations on the thermal performance of an ice storage system using twin concentric helical coil. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 179, 115737. [Google Scholar]
  90. Bi, Y.; Yu, M.; Wang, H.; Huang, J.; Lyu, T. Experimental investigation of ice melting system with open and closed ice-storage tanks combined internal and external ice melting processes. Energy Build. 2019, 194, 12–20. [Google Scholar]
  91. Eames, I.W.; Adref, K.T. Freezing and melting of water in spherical enclosures of the type used in thermal (ice) storage systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2002, 22, 733–745. [Google Scholar]
  92. Fang, G.; Liu, X.; Wu, S. Experimental investigation on performance of ice storage air-conditioning system with separate heat pipe. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2009, 33, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar]
  93. Han, K.; Ji, J.; Cai, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, F.; Uddin, M.M.; Song, Z. Experimental and numerical investigation on a novel photovoltaic direct-driven ice storage air-conditioning system. Renew. Energy 2021, 172, 514–528. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Basic schematic diagram of ice storage air conditioning system.
Figure 1. Basic schematic diagram of ice storage air conditioning system.
Energies 18 01734 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a typical internal ice melting system.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a typical internal ice melting system.
Energies 18 01734 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of a typical external ice melting system.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of a typical external ice melting system.
Energies 18 01734 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the combining internal and external ice melting system.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the combining internal and external ice melting system.
Energies 18 01734 g004
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of the heat transfer process in the ice storage unit; (b) Thermal resistance diagram.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of the heat transfer process in the ice storage unit; (b) Thermal resistance diagram.
Energies 18 01734 g005
Figure 6. Load time distribution of full ice storage mode air conditioning.
Figure 6. Load time distribution of full ice storage mode air conditioning.
Energies 18 01734 g006
Figure 7. Air conditioning load distribution in the operation mode of unit priority cooling.
Figure 7. Air conditioning load distribution in the operation mode of unit priority cooling.
Energies 18 01734 g007
Figure 8. Air conditioning load distribution in the operation mode of ice melting priority cooling.
Figure 8. Air conditioning load distribution in the operation mode of ice melting priority cooling.
Energies 18 01734 g008
Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics of different cold storage technologies.
Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics of different cold storage technologies.
TypeTechnical CharacteristicsEnergy Storage Density (kJ/kg)Evaporating Temperature (°C)System Efficiency (%)Cooling Temperature (°C)Cold Storage MediumHeat Transfer PerformanceOperation and Maintenance Costs
Water storageWater storage20.90.090.05.0–13.0Waterrelatively goodLow
Eutectic saltEutectic salt96.00.090.09.0–10.0Eutectic saltgeneralHigh
Ice storageCoil384.0−10.070.01.0–3.0icegoodHigh
ice ball350.0−10.070.01.0–3.0icegeneralHigh
slushy208.0−3.085.01.0–3.0slushygoodHigh
Gas hydrateGas hydrate302.0–464.00.0–3.090.0–95.06.0–3.0hydrategoodHigh
Table 2. Some ice storage cases.
Table 2. Some ice storage cases.
Ice Storage CasesRTTypeRefrigeration MachineCold Storage Technology
Marina Bay Cooling Project, Singapore26,000Office building16 refrigeration unitsIce-on-coil
Qatar Pearl Tower30,000Shopping centers52 refrigeration unitsIce-on-coil
Cooling for Business Bay Administration Building, UAE32,500High-rise office Building16 refrigeration unitsIce-on-coil
Texas Medical Center Cooling System120,000BuildingsAbsorption and electric chillersIce-on-coil
Table 3. Study on heat transfer enhancement of ice-on-coil.
Table 3. Study on heat transfer enhancement of ice-on-coil.
TypeNum.Parameters and DimensionsMain ContentsMain Conclusions Figures Ref.
Fins1(a) Four fins of 4 × 7 mm;
(b) Four fins of 2 × 8 mm;
(c) Eight fins of 2 × 3.5 mm;
(d) Eight fins of 1 × 4 mm.
Comparison of the enhancement effect of four different parameters of fins on the ice storage capacity of coils.As the number of fins increases and their height decreases, the solidification rate of the fins diminishes.Energies 18 01734 i001[42]
2Pitch: 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 mm; height: 30 mm ring fins.Study of optimal spacing between ring fins.The 50 mm spacing is optimized and the ring fins have a high ice storage rate of 21%.Energies 18 01734 i002[47]
3The number of fins is 6, 8, and 10; the height of the fins is 20, 30, and 40 mm; and the thickness of the fins is 1, 3, and 5 mm.The effects of fin height, fin thickness, and number of fins on the ice storage process are analyzed. New evaluation criteria are proposed to optimize the fin parameters.The optimal fin thickness and fin number are recommended to be 3 mm and 8 mm to achieve the largest performance enhancement with the least mass penalty.Energies 18 01734 i003[49]
4Six fins;
fins and tube thicknesses are the same;
Ro = 4 Ri;
Hf = 2.5 Ri;
Study the effect of fins of different lengths and PCM materials on heat transfer time.Increasing fin length reduces melting and solidification time by over 14%, while composite PCM reduces it by over 20%.Energies 18 01734 i004[50]
5Four fins; the height is 45 mm.Study of optimum height and angle of variable thickness fins.Fastest heat transfer at half-fin angle (β = 8°).Energies 18 01734 i005[51]
6(a) Pinned tube: 16 pins, spacing 3~9.5 mm, length 20~40 mm;
(b) Ring finned tube: five fins, spacing 52~92 mm, thickness 0.3~1.0 mm.
Analyze and compare the effects of different parameters of pinned and finned tubes on the heat transfer rate.Finned tubes have a larger heat transfer area than pinned tubes and store ice faster.Energies 18 01734 i006[52]
7Y-fins;
L1 = 0~11 mm;
L2 = 0~28.5 mm;
L3 = 4.5 mm;
L4 = 28.5 mm;
β = 13.4°~35.4°.
Single and double bifurcated Y-fins are proposed and geometrically optimized.Double bifurcation increases discharge efficiency by about 24%; a smaller beta angle results in shorter run times.Energies 18 01734 i007[53]
8Five fins;
Height is 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 times pipe diameter; θ = 3 0°, 45°, 60°, 72°.
Study of the effect of angle between fins on heat transfer performance.Using fins concentrated at the bottom improves efficiency and reduces heat transfer time by up to 50%.Energies 18 01734 i008[54]
9New symmetrical fins.Fills a gap in previous studies when buoyancy effects are present in the solidification process.Efficiency increased by 14.3% with the addition of nano thermal conductive particles combined with fins.Energies 18 01734 i009[55]
10Eight V-shaped fins;
The angle of the fin is 45°.
Study of the effect of V-fin and nanoparticles on heat transfer time in triplex-tube heat transfer.The use of fins has a greater impact on heat transfer than the addition of nanoparticles.Energies 18 01734 i010[56]
11New V-fins.The ice storage performance of V-shaped fins was compared with that of straight fins; the effects of V-shaped fin angle, length, and sub-width on ice storage were investigated.The smaller length or width ratio of the V-fin has a shorter ice storage time. Compared to straight fins, V-shaped fins reduce the total ice storage time by 64.2%.Energies 18 01734 i011[57]
12Bionic fins.Proposed new annular and axial fins, design and optimization of tree branch bionic fins.The radial fin design in Figure (a) has a tube spacing of 100 mm. The axial fin design with a tube spacing of 160 mm, as shown in Figure (b), was designed for longer charging and discharging times. The new axial fin design with a tube spacing of 70 mm, as shown in Figure (c). The Axial-70 fin design has a high power rate during the heat discharging of the storage unit.Energies 18 01734 i012[58]
Thin rings1Thin ring thickness is 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mm.Study of the effect of thin rings of different thicknesses on the rate of ice storage.Thin ring tubes had a 34% higher ice storage rate than smooth tubes.Energies 18 01734 i013[47]
2Single parallel;
Double parallel;
Staggered;
The thickness is 0.25, 1, 2, 3 mm.
Study of the effect of the parameters of thin rings on the heat transfer time.Staggering the thin rings and setting the thickness to 1 mm optimizes the overall heat transfer performance.Energies 18 01734 i014[48]
Table 4. Research on the operation strategy of ice storage system.
Table 4. Research on the operation strategy of ice storage system.
Main FactorsNumbersTechnical ApproachMain ContentsMain ConclusionsRef.
Cold storage capacity1Cooling model optimization.Taking four typical buildings as the research object, the influence of different control strategies and electricity price structures on the optimal ice storage rate was studied.When the ice storage rate is less than 0.267, the cooler priority control strategy will be more appropriate to the optimized control strategy; when the ice storage rate is >0.35, the ice storage priority control strategy is more appropriate to the optimized control strategy.[62]
2Particle swarm optimization.Outlines a study of load-shifting control strategies using different hot and cold energy storage facilities.Load-shifting controls using building thermal mass can achieve more than a 30% reduction in daily peak loads and significant total cost savings from 8.5% to 29%.[63]
3Model optimization.A model-based optimal design method using genetic algorithms is developed to actively optimize the storage capacity.Significant net annual cost savings of up to over USD 80,000 can be achieved by utilizing relatively small-scale active thermal and cooling energy storage systems, which is equivalent to 6.7% of a typical daily cooling load.[64]
A simulation-based approach to optimize the design of small-scale active energy storage systems in buildings to limit their power demand is proposed.Demand-limiting controls using small storage tanks can save about 7% of a building’s total annual power consumption costs each year. The optimal storage capacity is less than 5% of the daily cooling load.[65]
running cost1Forward dynamic programming algorithm.An efficient model prediction controller for the charging and discharging of the ice storage part was developed (energy costs, equipment costs).The model-predictive controller (MPC) receives tariff updates and re-optimizes the cooling system strategy according to the new prices. The open-loop optimal control does not have this information and operates the chiller at a very high price, resulting in operating costs that are approximately 40% higher.[66]
2Dynamic programming algorithm.Discussing the optimization of the ice storage air conditioning system under the condition of considering the minimum life cycle cost and efficiency of ice storage tank.In the ice priority mode, life cycle costs are lower than for a conventional air conditioning system from the fourth year of operation, and under the 10-year life cycle, nine ice-storage units with an ice charging rate of 36.2% incur minimum cost.[67]
The cost optimization analysis is carried out on the selection of cold storage equipment and chiller, and the influence of charge and discharge strategy and electricity price strategy on system operation is determined.The optimal operating protocol for storage charging and discharging is determined by a dynamic programming method that minimizes the operating cost over an entire year.[68]
3Nonlinear programming methods.A strategy based on mixed integer nonlinear programming is proposed to optimize the running schedule of building energy systems.This strategy can significantly reduce operating energy costs (about 25%), reducing or even increasing to about 47% when using thermal energy storage systems.[69]
4Model optimization.Model-based real-time predictive optimal control of active and passive building thermal storage inventories in a test facility using time-of-use differentiated tariffs without demand charges is demonstrated.When the optimal controller is given an imperfect weather forecast, the utility cost of the energy resource station can save 17% over the base case and 27% over the reference case.[70]
5Mathematical modeling.Optimized for life cycle economics.Under the full load storage scenario and the base tariff structure, the daily savings would be USD 549.4/day, with the energy storage capital costs being paid off over 10 years, afterwards the daily saving in operational cost will be USD 4011.76/day.[71,72]
6Neural network model.Combination of neural network-based model prediction and genetic algorithm.When time-of-use pricing or real-time pricing are adopted, the operating costs of district cooling networks are reduced by approximately 16% and 13%, respectively.[73,74,75]
7Software modeling.A model-based predictive control algorithm for cooling systems of small commercial buildings is proposed.The proposed MPC algorithm can save about 5–20% per year, and the chiller priority strategy can save 20–30% per year.[76]
Operational Energy Consumption1Particle swarm optimization.Study of system energy consumption and CO2 emissions.The optimum capacity of the chiller is estimated to be 250 RT when the ice storage capacity is set to 1800 RT-h.[77]
2Model optimization.A methodology is presented for determining the optimal chilled water storage (CWS) capacity and corresponding operating strategy for air conditioning loads at different electricity rates.The optimal CWS strategy reduces peak demand by 38% under time-of-use (TOU) tariffs. Accordingly, customers can save 5.9% on operating costs.[78]
3Strategy optimization.The energy performance of a distributed energy system with a district cooling system (DES&DCS) was evaluated under four different control strategies. Comparisons were made with DCS and stand-alone cooling systems that are fully dependent on the grid.Compared with the system that also adopts DCSs but only depends on the grid, the DES&DCS can save more than 10% of primary energy. Compared with the system that adopts an individual cooling system and only depends on the grid, the energy saving can be more than 16% and up to 19.1%.[79]
4Software modeling.Using EnergyPlus software modeling to validate a prediction methodology specifically designed to control multi-zone heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems.Regardless of the mode of operation (heating or cooling) and the time of year, energy consumption is significantly reduced by about 5 to 15%.[80]
Development of a dynamic computer model for ice thermal storage systems to compare energy use in conventional air-cooled systems and ice thermal storage systems.Full ice storage can save up to 55% of the monthly cost of electricity needed for cooling compared to traditional air-cooling systems. Using the full storage option can reduce the total energy consumption of a selected building by up to 5%.[81]
5Mathematical modeling.A detailed mathematical model is proposed for the combination of heating and cooling chemistries in district energy to achieve the best performance of the whole system.Effective savings in total annual costs and CO2 emissions. More than 67% of the CO2 reductions are achieved by mixing heat and district cooling.[82]
External factors1Weather incorporated into the control system.Consider the temperature parameters required for the indoor environment.Significant increase in system operational capacity.[83]
A novel HVAC control method is proposed to minimize energy consumption while maintaining comfortable indoor temperatures based on short-term future predictions from weather forecasting models.Energy savings of up to 58.79% have been demonstrated in EnergyPlus simulations.[84]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, Z.; Chang, Z.; Chang, C. Research Progress on the Performance Enhancement Technology of Ice-on-Coil Energy Storage. Energies 2025, 18, 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071734

AMA Style

Guo X, Xu X, Wang Z, Chang Z, Chang C. Research Progress on the Performance Enhancement Technology of Ice-on-Coil Energy Storage. Energies. 2025; 18(7):1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Xinxin, Xiaoyu Xu, Zhixin Wang, Zheshao Chang, and Chun Chang. 2025. "Research Progress on the Performance Enhancement Technology of Ice-on-Coil Energy Storage" Energies 18, no. 7: 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071734

APA Style

Guo, X., Xu, X., Wang, Z., Chang, Z., & Chang, C. (2025). Research Progress on the Performance Enhancement Technology of Ice-on-Coil Energy Storage. Energies, 18(7), 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071734

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop