Next Article in Journal
An Evaluation of the Energy Potential of Agri-Food Waste: Green Residues from Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and Shea Nutshells (Vitellaria paradoxa)
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling an Electrolyzer in a Graph-Based Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Social Innovations for Improving Compostable Packaging Waste Management in CE: A Multi-Solution Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Integrated Waste Management in the Circular Economy Era: Insights from Research and Practice

by
Charisios Achillas
1,* and
Christos Vlachokostas
2
1
Department of Supply Chain Management, School of Economics and Business Administration, International Hellenic University, 60100 Katerini, Greece
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(3), 728; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030728
Submission received: 2 January 2025 / Accepted: 10 January 2025 / Published: 5 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Waste Management)

Abstract

:
This Special Issue on integrated waste management explores innovative approaches and multifaceted strategies aimed at addressing the critical challenges facing modern waste management systems. The featured eight original research articles cover diverse topics, including sewage sludge valorization, municipal waste biodrying, recyclables collection optimization, biomass-to-energy policies, and the management of compostable packaging waste. Technological advancements, such as AI-driven waste sorting and route optimization algorithms, are highlighted alongside policy frameworks supporting circular economy principles. The studies also address barriers to implementation, including public awareness gaps, technological disparities, and financial constraints, while emphasizing the importance of stakeholder collaboration across governments, industries, and communities. Additionally, environmental risks associated with waste management practices, such as nanoparticle contamination and leachate emissions from ashes, are critically analyzed. This Special Issue provides a holistic perspective on waste management, combining technical innovations, environmental stewardship, and policy integration. The insights of the works published in this Special Issue aim to guide researchers, policy-makers, and practitioners toward building resilient, sustainable, and resource-efficient waste management systems in alignment with global sustainability goals.

1. The Concept of Integrated Waste Management

Waste management constitutes one of the most critical aspects of the modern world. Due to the rapid growth of urban population over the years, as well as the changing consumption habits and lifestyle patterns of societies around the globe, solid waste management has emerged as one of the most important pressures on the natural environment. In parallel, the environmental concerns of people are constantly increasing, with citizens across the world “demanding” environmentally sound management of solid wastes. Undoubtedly, due to the complexity of the problem under study, there is not a single waste management option available that can provide a holistic solution for all different kinds of waste streams generated (e.g., municipal solid waste, industrial waste, bio-waste, waste electrical and electronic equipment, construction and demolition waste, end-of-life vehicles) and globally satisfy the needs of different populations with diverse characteristics, customs, and habits. To that end, different, alternative processes, technologies, and strategies must be developed and proposed, so as to cover the high requirements for efficient waste management in a number of topics (e.g., waste generation, characterization, collection, separation, treatment, and final disposal). In this light, integrated waste management strategies are considered a prerequisite for sustainability.
In this light, integrated waste management represents a holistic approach to handling waste, combining various strategies, technologies, and policies to minimize environmental impact while optimizing resource recovery and waste reduction. The core principle of integrated waste management is the waste management hierarchy, which prioritizes waste prevention, followed by reuse, recycling, energy recovery, and, finally, safe disposal [1]. This approach integrates social, economic, and environmental dimensions, ensuring that waste is managed sustainably throughout its life cycle [2].
In recent years, the focus of integrated waste management has evolved towards circular economy principles, where waste is considered a resource rather than a burden [3,4,5]. Technologies such as anaerobic digestion, composting, biodrying, and advanced recycling processes play a significant role in closing the material loop. Moreover, emerging concepts such as decentralized waste management systems and smart waste technologies are reshaping waste management landscapes globally.
The articles in this Special Issue reflect this multifaceted nature of integrated waste management. For example, the optimization of municipal waste biodrying plants [6], the potential of sewage sludge as a soil amendment [7], and advancements in compostable packaging management [8] highlight how technological innovation, policy enforcement, and social participation are essential components of a successful integrated waste management strategy. The transition from linear to circular waste management systems requires collaboration among governments, industries, and communities, emphasizing the importance of education, technological advancements, and strict policy implementation.

2. Modern Trends in Integrated Waste Management

Integrated waste management is witnessing transformative trends driven by policy shifts, technological innovation, and growing environmental awareness. At the forefront of these trends is the integration of circular economy principles into waste management policies, focusing on waste prevention, material recovery, and resource efficiency. Governments worldwide are adopting ambitious waste reduction targets, emphasizing recycling and the diversion of biodegradable waste from landfills [9].
Technological advancements play a key role in modernizing waste management systems. For instance, biodrying plants [6] and anaerobic digestion processes are increasingly being employed to recover energy from organic waste. Similarly, smart technologies, such as IoT-enabled waste bins and AI-driven waste sorting systems, are improving efficiency in collection, segregation, and recycling [10,11]. In urban settings, the optimization of solid waste collection routes using mixed-integer programming is gaining widespread attention [12], contributing to energy and resource savings.
Another significant trend is the rise of compostable and biodegradable packaging materials. However, their effective integration into waste streams remains a challenge, as highlighted by studies focusing on social innovations for compostable packaging waste management [8]. Additionally, decentralized waste management solutions, particularly in rural and underserved areas, are becoming increasingly relevant, as they reduce transportation costs and promote local resource recovery.
On the policy front, stricter regulations around landfill use and incineration are driving investments in waste-to-energy technologies and alternative treatment methods [13]. Countries are also incentivizing zero-waste cities and industries through subsidies, tax breaks, and certification programs [14].
The future of integrated waste management lies in fostering collaborations between the quadruple helix, i.e., governments, industries, academia, and local communities. Education campaigns, transparent governance, and robust data analytics systems will be critical in addressing barriers to effective waste management implementation. The integration of these trends, as also reflected in the research articles in this Special Issue, demonstrates a collective move towards sustainable waste management practices that align with global climate goals and resource conservation mandates [15].

3. Barriers and Constraints in Integrated Waste Management

Despite significant advancements, integrated waste management continues to face several barriers and constraints. One of the most persistent challenges is the lack of public awareness and participation. Effective waste segregation at source remains inconsistent, often undermining downstream recycling and recovery efforts [8]. Furthermore, social acceptance of waste-to-energy technologies and compostable packaging remains limited in many regions, despite their environmental and economic benefits [6,8].
Technical challenges also pose significant barriers. For instance, the high moisture content of and variability in municipal solid waste can affect the efficiency of biodrying and composting technologies [6]. Similarly, sewage sludge, despite its potential as a soil amendment, faces constraints related to heavy metal contamination and pathogen risks [7]. Another significant barrier lies in technological disparities. Urban areas often benefit from advanced waste management infrastructure, while rural and peri-urban regions rely on rudimentary disposal methods. This digital and technological divide prevents equitable access to sustainable waste solutions [16].
Economic constraints are equally critical. High capital and operational costs associated with advanced waste treatment technologies often deter local governments, particularly in developing regions, from investing in sustainable solutions [17]. Additionally, the lack of financial incentives for private-sector participation in waste management hinders innovation and scalability [18]. Policy and regulatory barriers further exacerbate this problem. While many countries have established comprehensive waste management policies, enforcement and monitoring remain inconsistent. Fragmented institutional responsibilities and overlapping jurisdictions often result in inefficient governance and implementation gaps.
Addressing these constraints requires a multi-pronged approach, combining policy reform, financial incentives, public education, and technology transfer. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders, including policy-makers, scientists, industry experts, and communities, are essential to overcoming these barriers and building resilient waste management systems that align with global sustainability goals.

4. Contributions of the Special Issue on Integrated Waste Management

In this context, this Special Issue on integrated waste management aims to provide information and evidence on the field for researchers, practitioners, and/or policy-makers, as well as to contribute to the waste management agenda through enhanced scientific and multidisciplinary knowledge to boost the performance efficiency of waste management and support policy-making.
The Special Issue includes eight original papers that span a wide range of innovative, multifaceted, and technical developments, addressing various critical aspects of integrated waste management. These contributions collectively highlight advancements in waste treatment technologies, policy frameworks, optimization models, and sustainable resource recovery practices. Each paper offers valuable insights into overcoming contemporary challenges in waste management while emphasizing the integration of circular economy principles and environmental sustainability.
More specifically, the studies explore diverse themes and offer insights into integrated waste management, addressing technological innovations, policy analysis, and social dimensions of sustainable waste handling as follows: Neczaj et al. [7] explore the potential of sewage sludge and biodegradable waste for producing high-value soil amendments. Their study highlights the effectiveness of composting processes in enhancing soil fertility while mitigating heavy metal risks. In their study, Książek et al. [12] examine the efficiency of solid waste collection routes using mixed-integer programming. Their findings demonstrate significant improvements in operational efficiency and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by optimizing waste collection schedules. Moreover, Kasiński et al. [6] analyze the long-term performances of municipal waste biodrying plants. The authors emphasize the role of technological improvements in enhancing waste recovery and minimizing environmental impacts. In their work, Lee and Tsai [19] provide an overview of biomass-to-energy policies in Taiwan, showcasing the role of regulatory incentives in promoting renewable energy from waste-derived biomass. Kędzia et al. [8] investigate social innovations for managing compostable packaging waste, emphasizing the role of multi-stakeholder collaboration and social education. Moreover, Gajec et al. [20] study methods for separating silver nanoparticles from drilling waste, contributing to improved nanowaste management practices, while Kicińska and Caba [21] analyze the leaching behaviors of chlorides, sulfates, and phosphates from ashes formed by burning municipal waste, highlighting environmental risks. In the work of Choe [22], wood biomass cyclone burner technology is reviewed. The study examines this technology’s efficiency in energy recovery and potential for reducing emissions.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this Special Issue on integrated waste management brings together a diverse collection of research that addresses critical technical, environmental, and social challenges in modern waste management systems. The eight original papers highlight innovative technologies, optimized processes, and policy frameworks essential for advancing towards a circular economy. From sewage sludge valorization to waste collection optimization and from nanoparticle recovery to compostable packaging management, these studies provide actionable insights for sustainable waste solutions.
Together, these studies present a cohesive narrative that bridges technical, social, and policy aspects of integrated waste management, offering actionable insights for researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers. The papers published in this Special Issue present a cohesive and comprehensive overview of the current trends, technological breakthroughs, and systemic challenges in the field. They not only contribute to the scientific knowledge base but also provide actionable recommendations for policy-makers, industry professionals, and stakeholders. In this context, this Special Issue serves as a valuable resource for researchers, policy-makers, and industry practitioners striving to co-design and create innovative, resilient, efficient, and environmentally responsible waste management systems worldwide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A. and C.V.; formal analysis, C.A. and C.V.; resources, C.A. and C.V.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A.; writing—review and editing, C.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This editorial received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors of this Special Issue extend their heartfelt gratitude to all the authors who contributed their valuable research and insights.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Oyejobi, D.O.; Firoozi, A.A.; Fernandez, D.B.; Avudaiappan, S. Integrating circular economy principles into concrete technology: Enhancing sustainability through industrial waste utilization. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 102846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Banias, G.; Batsioula, M.; Achillas, C.; Patsios, S.; Kontogiannopoulos, K.; Bochtis, D.; Moussiopoulos, N. A life cycle analysis approach for the evaluation of municipal solid waste management practices: The case study of the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rodias, E.; Aivazidou, E.; Achillas, C.; Aidonis, D.; Bochtis, D. Water-energy-nutrients synergies in the agrifood sector: A circular economy framework. Energies 2020, 14, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vlachokostas, C.; Achillas, C.; Diamantis, V.; Michailidou, A.V.; Baginetas, K.; Aidonis, D. Supporting decision making to achieve circularity via a biodegradable waste-to-bioenergy and compost facility. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 285, 112215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Achillas, C.; Bochtis, D. Toward a green, closed-loop, circular bioeconomy: Boosting the performance efficiency of circular business models. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kasiński, S.; Debowski, M.; Olkowska, M.; Rudnicki, M. Analysis of the long-term mass balance and efficiency of waste recovery in a municipal waste biodrying plant. Energies 2021, 14, 7711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Neczaj, E.; Grosser, A.; Grobelak, A.; Celary, P.; Singh, B.R. Conversion of sewage sludge and other biodegradable waste into high-value soil amendment within a circular bioeconomy perspective. Energies 2021, 14, 6953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kędzia, G.; Ocicka, B.; Pluta-Zaremba, A.; Razniewska, M.; Turek, J.; Wieteska-Rosiak, B. Social innovations for improving compostable packaging waste management in CE: A multi-solution perspective. Energies 2022, 15, 9119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Awewomom, J.; Dzeble, F.; Takyi, Y.D.; Ashie, W.B.; Ettey, E.; Afua, P.E.; Sackey, L.; Opoku, F.; Akoto, O. Addressing global environmental pollution using environmental control techniques: A focus on environmental policy and preventive environmental management. Discov. Environ. 2024, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Olawade, D.; Fapohunda, O.; Wada, O.; Usman, S.; Ige, A.; Ajisafe, O.; Oladapo, B. Smart waste management: A paradigm shift enabled by artificial intelligence. Waste Manag. Bull. 2024, 2, 244–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vlachokostas, C. Closing the loop between energy production and waste management: A conceptual approach towards sustainable development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Książek, R.; Korcyl, A.; Gdowska, K. Recyclables collection route balancing problem with heterogeneous fleet. Energies 2021, 14, 7406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vlachokostas, C.; Michailidou, A.V.; Achillas, C. Multi-criteria decision analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy management strategies: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 138, 110563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meng, M.; Wen, Z.; Luo, W.; Wang, S. Approaches and policies to promote zero-waste city construction: China’s practices and lessons. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iakovou, E.; Vlachos, D.; Achillas, C.; Anastasiadis, F. Design of sustainable supply chains for the agrifood sector: A holistic research framework. Agric. Eng. Int. 2014, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shen, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y. Environmental inequality in peri-urban areas: A case study of Huangpu District, Guangzhou City. Land 2024, 13, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aleluia, J.; Ferrão, P. Assessing the costs of municipal solid waste treatment technologies in developing Asian countries. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 592–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Banerjee, S.; Sarkhel, P. Municipal solid waste management, household and local government participation: A cross country analysis. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2019, 63, 210–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, Y.-R.; Tsai, W.-T. Overview of biomass-to-energy supply and promotion policy in Taiwan. Energies 2022, 15, 6576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gajec, M.; Kukulska-Zajac, E.; Król, A. Optimization of silver nanoparticle separation method from drilling waste matrices. Energies 2021, 14, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kicinska, A.; Caba, G. Leaching of chlorides, sulphates, and phosphates from ashes formed as a result of burning conventional fuels, alternative fuels, and municipal waste in household furnaces. Energies 2021, 14, 3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choe, K. Review of Wood biomass cyclone burner. Energies 2021, 14, 4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Achillas, C.; Vlachokostas, C. Integrated Waste Management in the Circular Economy Era: Insights from Research and Practice. Energies 2025, 18, 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030728

AMA Style

Achillas C, Vlachokostas C. Integrated Waste Management in the Circular Economy Era: Insights from Research and Practice. Energies. 2025; 18(3):728. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030728

Chicago/Turabian Style

Achillas, Charisios, and Christos Vlachokostas. 2025. "Integrated Waste Management in the Circular Economy Era: Insights from Research and Practice" Energies 18, no. 3: 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030728

APA Style

Achillas, C., & Vlachokostas, C. (2025). Integrated Waste Management in the Circular Economy Era: Insights from Research and Practice. Energies, 18(3), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030728

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop