Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Review of Data-Driven and Physics-Based Models for Energy Performance in Non-Domestic Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
Wind Power Prediction Method Based on Physics-Guided Fusion and Distribution Constraints
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metaheuristic-Based Control Parameter Optimization of DFIG-Based Wind Energy Conversion Systems Using the Opposition-Based Search Optimization Algorithm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Mitigating Load Shedding in South Africa Through Optimized Hybrid Solar–Battery Deployment: A Techno-Economic Assessment

by
Ginevra Vittoria
1 and
Rui Castro
2,*
1
Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
2
INESC-ID/IST, University of Lisbon, 1000-029 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(24), 6480; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18246480 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 November 2025 / Revised: 4 December 2025 / Accepted: 8 December 2025 / Published: 10 December 2025

Abstract

South Africa’s persistent electricity shortages and recurrent load shedding remain among the most pressing challenges to national economic growth and social stability. This paper presents a techno-economic framework to assess how optimized deployment of photovoltaic (PV) and battery energy storage systems (BESSs) can mitigate these disruptions under realistic grid and regulatory constraints. Despite recent operational improvements at Eskom—including a 10-month period without load shedding in 2024—energy insecurity persists due to aging coal assets, limited transmission capacity, and slow renewable integration. Using hourly demand and solar-resource data for 2023, combined with Eskom’s load-reduction records, a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) model identifies cost-optimal hybrid system configurations that minimize the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) while maximizing coverage of unserved energy. Three deployment scenarios are analyzed: (i) constrained regional grid capacity, (ii) flexible redistribution of capacity across six provinces, and (iii) unconstrained national deployment. Results indicate that constrained deployment covers about 86% of curtailed load at 1.88 USD kWh−1, whereas flexible and unconstrained scenarios achieve over 99% coverage at ≈0.58 USD kWh−1. The findings demonstrate that targeted PV–BESS expansion, coupled with selective grid reinforcement, can effectively eliminate load shedding and accelerate South Africa’s transition toward a resilient, low-carbon electricity system.
Keywords: hybrid renewable energy systems; load shedding; solar photovoltaic; battery energy storage; grid integration; levelized cost of electricity; energy system optimization; South Africa hybrid renewable energy systems; load shedding; solar photovoltaic; battery energy storage; grid integration; levelized cost of electricity; energy system optimization; South Africa

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vittoria, G.; Castro, R. Mitigating Load Shedding in South Africa Through Optimized Hybrid Solar–Battery Deployment: A Techno-Economic Assessment. Energies 2025, 18, 6480. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18246480

AMA Style

Vittoria G, Castro R. Mitigating Load Shedding in South Africa Through Optimized Hybrid Solar–Battery Deployment: A Techno-Economic Assessment. Energies. 2025; 18(24):6480. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18246480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vittoria, Ginevra, and Rui Castro. 2025. "Mitigating Load Shedding in South Africa Through Optimized Hybrid Solar–Battery Deployment: A Techno-Economic Assessment" Energies 18, no. 24: 6480. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18246480

APA Style

Vittoria, G., & Castro, R. (2025). Mitigating Load Shedding in South Africa Through Optimized Hybrid Solar–Battery Deployment: A Techno-Economic Assessment. Energies, 18(24), 6480. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18246480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop