This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain
by
Oscar Castillo Campo
Oscar Castillo Campo
and
Roberto Álvarez Fernández
Roberto Álvarez Fernández *
Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Nebrija, Calle Santa Cruz de Marcenado 27, 28015 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(21), 5863; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 October 2025
/
Revised: 31 October 2025
/
Accepted: 4 November 2025
/
Published: 6 November 2025
Abstract
This paper focuses on assessing different sustainable energy generation and storage systems for residential buildings in Spain, identifying the best-performing system according to the end-user requirements. As outlined by the consulted literature, the authors have selected two types of hybrid configurations—a Photovoltaic System with Battery Backup (PSBB) and a Photovoltaic System with Hydrogen Hybrid Storage Backup (PSHB)—and a Grid-Based System with Renewable Hydrogen Contribution (GSHC) is proposed. A Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process methodology (FAHP) is employed for evaluating the hybrid power systems from a multi-criteria approach: acquisition, operational, and environmental. The main requirements for selecting the optimal system are organized under these criteria and evaluated using key performance indicators. This methodology allows the selection of the best option considering objective and subjective system performance indicators. Beyond establishing the ranking, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to provide insights into how individual criteria influence the ranking of the hybrid power systems alternatives. The results demonstrate that the selection of hybrid power systems for a residential building is highly dependent on consumer preferences, but the PSBB system scores highly in operation and acquisition criteria, while the GSHC has good performance in all the criteria.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Castillo Campo, O.; Fernández, R.Á.
Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain. Energies 2025, 18, 5863.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863
AMA Style
Castillo Campo O, Fernández RÁ.
Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain. Energies. 2025; 18(21):5863.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863
Chicago/Turabian Style
Castillo Campo, Oscar, and Roberto Álvarez Fernández.
2025. "Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain" Energies 18, no. 21: 5863.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863
APA Style
Castillo Campo, O., & Fernández, R. Á.
(2025). Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain. Energies, 18(21), 5863.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.