Next Article in Journal
Weight-Adaptable Disturbance Observer for Continuous-Control-Set Model Predictive Control of NPC-3L-Fed PMSMs
Previous Article in Journal
An Efficient Heuristic Algorithm for Stochastic Multi-Timescale Network Reconfiguration for Medium- and High-Voltage Distribution Networks with High Renewables
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain

by
Oscar Castillo Campo
and
Roberto Álvarez Fernández
*
Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Nebrija, Calle Santa Cruz de Marcenado 27, 28015 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(21), 5863; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 October 2025 / Revised: 31 October 2025 / Accepted: 4 November 2025 / Published: 6 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Transition: Urban Planning and Climate Change)

Abstract

This paper focuses on assessing different sustainable energy generation and storage systems for residential buildings in Spain, identifying the best-performing system according to the end-user requirements. As outlined by the consulted literature, the authors have selected two types of hybrid configurations—a Photovoltaic System with Battery Backup (PSBB) and a Photovoltaic System with Hydrogen Hybrid Storage Backup (PSHB)—and a Grid-Based System with Renewable Hydrogen Contribution (GSHC) is proposed. A Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process methodology (FAHP) is employed for evaluating the hybrid power systems from a multi-criteria approach: acquisition, operational, and environmental. The main requirements for selecting the optimal system are organized under these criteria and evaluated using key performance indicators. This methodology allows the selection of the best option considering objective and subjective system performance indicators. Beyond establishing the ranking, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to provide insights into how individual criteria influence the ranking of the hybrid power systems alternatives. The results demonstrate that the selection of hybrid power systems for a residential building is highly dependent on consumer preferences, but the PSBB system scores highly in operation and acquisition criteria, while the GSHC has good performance in all the criteria.
Keywords: hybrid power system; combined heat and power systems; fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; multicriteria decision making; residential buildings; sustainable energy generation systems hybrid power system; combined heat and power systems; fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; multicriteria decision making; residential buildings; sustainable energy generation systems

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castillo Campo, O.; Fernández, R.Á. Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain. Energies 2025, 18, 5863. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863

AMA Style

Castillo Campo O, Fernández RÁ. Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain. Energies. 2025; 18(21):5863. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castillo Campo, Oscar, and Roberto Álvarez Fernández. 2025. "Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain" Energies 18, no. 21: 5863. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863

APA Style

Castillo Campo, O., & Fernández, R. Á. (2025). Methodology for Evaluating and Comparing Different Sustainable Energy Generation and Storage Systems for Residential Buildings—Application to the Case of Spain. Energies, 18(21), 5863. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215863

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop