Next Article in Journal
Methodology for Assessing the Technical Potential of Solar Energy Based on Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Simulation-Modeling Tools
Previous Article in Journal
Feasibility Study of Flywheel Mitigation Controls Using Hamiltonian-Based Design for E3 High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse Events
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Climate-Resilient Dwellings: A Comparative Analysis of Passive and Active Retrofit Solutions in Aging Central European Housing Stock
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Building Energy Performance Modelling and Simulation

by
Joanna Ferdyn-Grygierek
1,*,
Krzysztof Grygierek
2 and
Agnes Psikuta
3
1
Department of Heating, Ventilation and Dust Removal Technology, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 20, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
2
Department of Mechanics and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
3
Empa—Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Technology and Science, 9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(19), 5295; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195295
Submission received: 26 September 2025 / Accepted: 3 October 2025 / Published: 7 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Building Energy Performance Modelling and Simulation)
The building sector is currently facing two conflicting challenges—the urgent need to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and the continuous growth of expectations regarding thermal comfort, indoor air quality, and health [1]. Addressing such a dual challenge requires robust analytical tools. Building Energy Modelling (BEM) and Building Performance Simulation (BPS) have therefore become indispensable tools to support energy-efficient design, optimize building operations, and guide retrofit strategies [2,3,4].
The recent literature highlights five major directions for BEM application [5]:
  • Performance-driven design of new and retrofitted buildings;
  • Operational optimization of HVAC and energy systems;
  • Integration with real-time data and the development of digital twins;
  • Urban Building Energy Modelling (UBEM) to support city-level energy planning;
  • Building-to-grid interaction for demand response and resilience.
Simulation models in this field can be broadly divided into physical (forward) models—based on energy and mass balance equations—and data-driven (inverse) models, which rely on statistical or machine learning techniques. While the former offer strong physical interpretability, the latter provide efficiency and adaptability, particularly when combined in hybrid approaches [6].
The application of simulation methods has a long history [6]. Early overviews highlighted the growing potential of building simulation for design and operation [7], while more recent developments have demonstrated its use in co-simulation frameworks [8] and as a methodological basis for retrofitting strategies in existing buildings [9]. A wide range of software tools, such as EnergyPlus, ESP-r, and TRNSYS, now support both research and industry practice, each with their own strengths and limitations [10].
Contemporary research highlights the role of simulation in enhancing performance-driven design [5], as well as in operational optimization of building systems through advanced control strategies [8]. Furthermore, simulation has extended beyond the building scale towards UBEM, which provides valuable insights for city-scale planning and integration with renewable energy systems [11,12,13].
Optimization remains a key application of BPS, with multi-objective algorithms such as NSGA-II enabling simultaneous improvement of energy efficiency and thermal comfort [14]. Deterministic and probabilistic approaches to optimization have been applied for their ability to handle complex, non-smooth performance functions [15]. Case studies further demonstrate the value of optimization in tailoring retrofit and comfort strategies to local contexts [16].
Finally, current advances increasingly integrate data-driven methods into traditional simulation workflows. Hybrid frameworks combining physical modelling with machine learning enable predictive maintenance, advanced control, and digital twin applications [5]. The rapid expansion of sensor networks and IoT technologies is accelerating these developments, pointing towards a future where BPS will be tightly integrated with real-time building management and urban energy systems [17,18].
BPS methods based on macroscale models are complemented by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods for a detailed analysis of the distribution of air parameters in the room, which allows, for example, for the assessment of local human thermal sensations or the distribution of pollutants in the zone.
Against this background, this Special Issue of Energies, “Building Energy Performance Modelling and Simulation”, brings together a diverse set of research contributions. The published papers demonstrate the breadth of applications of simulation and modelling techniques—from building retrofits and new design concepts, through data-driven optimization, to advanced computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Together, they form a comprehensive picture of current advances in building energy performance research.
  • Retrofitting and Climate-Resilient Design
The issue features three contributions that focus on the retrofit of existing housing stock. Ferdyn-Grygierek and Grygierek present a comparative analysis of passive and active retrofit solutions in ageing multifamily housing in Central Europe. Their co-simulation approach, combining EnergyPlus and CONTAM, reveals the high potential of hybrid passive measures such as solar protective glazing and reflective roofs to reduce summer overheating while maintaining winter energy efficiency. The work highlights the importance of tailoring retrofit strategies to future climate conditions.
A complementary perspective is offered by Menconi et al., who analyze retrofit strategies for traditional listed dwellings in the UK. Their study underlines the tension between heritage preservation and energy efficiency, proposing systemic approaches to passive retrofitting that respect the thermo-hygrometric balance of historic constructions. This contribution demonstrates that responsible retrofit can simultaneously safeguard cultural value and contribute to climate targets.
Ciuman et al. provide insights into newly designed single-family houses within the framework of the “4E Idea”—energy-saving, ecological, ergonomic, and economic. Their simulations in IDA ICE highlight the role of integrated design combining efficient HVAC systems, renewable energy sources, and cost optimization. The results not only serve as a proof-of-concept but also provide benchmarks for future sustainable residential designs.
  • Data-Driven Modelling and Machine Learning
Two papers explore the integration of artificial intelligence and digital methods into building energy assessment. Nassif et al. apply machine learning techniques—ranging from linear regression to neural networks and ensemble methods—to predict heating coil performance in HVAC systems. Their results point to bagging and neural networks as highly promising approaches, capable of improving system efficiency and reducing operational uncertainties.
Tsikas et al. advance this line of research by proposing a BIM-based machine learning application for a parametric assessment of residential building energy performance. By training statistical and AI models on a dataset of 337 BIM-derived instances, they demonstrate that artificial neural networks can serve as accurate surrogate models for complex energy simulations. Importantly, they also deliver a user-friendly interface tool, making such predictive modelling accessible for practical design applications.
  • Advanced Thermal and Airflow Simulation
The Special Issue also contains valuable contributions addressing the detailed physical modelling of building components and airflows. Urzędowski et al. use CFD and statistical analysis to investigate how material parameters, such as surface emissivity and roughness, affect the thermal resistance of ETICS wall systems. Their results show the potential of reflective coatings and microstructural optimization to significantly enhance wall performance while reducing thickness, with implications for prefabricated elements.
Hurnik et al. conduct a comprehensive validation of different turbulence models in predicting sidewall jet airflow in rooms. Their study confirms the reliability of the standard k-ε and EVTM models while highlighting the limitations of other approaches. This research provides practical guidance for selecting CFD models in HVAC design, particularly in the early stages where accurate airflow prediction is crucial for comfort assessment.
  • Urban and Occupancy-Related Factors
Beyond the scale of individual components and systems, the issue also includes research on urban and human-related aspects of energy performance. Sadłowska-Sałęga and Wąs evaluate the impact of shading from neighbouring buildings in the historic centre of Kraków. Their simulations show that shading can increase heating demand while substantially reducing cooling loads, emphasizing that urban morphology must be accounted for in retrofit strategies and HVAC system sizing.
Nam and Kim explore energy performance improvements in Korean senior centres. Their combination of simulation and economic feasibility analysis reveals that although multiple measures improve efficiency, boiler replacement is the only intervention with a positive long-term economic return without government subsidies. This study is a reminder of the importance of coupling technical performance with financial viability in real-world decision-making.
Norouziasl et al. investigate occupancy factors in a US small office buildings using agent-based modelling combined with EnergyPlus simulations. They identify occupant density as the most influential parameter across climate zones. The study highlights the stochastic nature of occupancy and demonstrates the value of dynamic schedules for more realistic energy modelling.
  • Conclusions and Perspectives
Taken together, the contributions in this Special Issue reflect both the maturity and the evolving frontiers of building energy performance simulation. On one hand, the works confirm the central role of simulation in assessing retrofit strategies, system performance, and comfort conditions. On the other, they showcase emerging opportunities—from AI-based surrogate modelling to hybrid physical-data approaches—that promise to accelerate and enhance decision-making in both design and operation.
Looking forward, several trends are likely to shape the field:
  • the integration of physics-based and machine learning models into hybrid frameworks;
  • increased emphasis on resilience to climate change, particularly in retrofitting existing and historic stock;
  • the extension of simulation from individual buildings to urban contexts, incorporating morphology and microclimate;
  • and the systematic inclusion of user behaviour and economic feasibility in performance assessments.
We hope that the articles presented here will serve as inspiration and a valuable reference for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers engaged in creating energy-efficient, resilient, and comfortable built environments.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the authors for their contributions, the reviewers for their constructive feedback, and the editorial team of Energies for their support in preparing this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Ferdyn-Grygierek, J.; Grygierek, K. Towards Climate-Resilient Dwellings: A Comparative Analysis of Passive and Active Retrofit Solutions in Aging Central European Housing Stock. Energies 2025, 18, 4386. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164386.
  • Menconi, M.; Painting, N.; Piroozfar, P. Simulated Results of a Passive Energy Retrofit Approach for Traditional Listed Dwellings in the UK. Energies 2025, 18, 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18040850.
  • Ciuman, P.; Kaczmarczyk, J.; Winnicka-Jasłowska, D. Investigation of Energy-Efficient Solutions for a Single-Family House Based on the 4E Idea in Poland. Energies 2025, 18, 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18020449.
  • Nassif, A.; Dharmasena, P.; Nassif, N. Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Heating Coil Performance in Building Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems. Energies 2025, 18, 2314. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092314.
  • Tsikas, P.; Chassiakos, A.; Papadimitropoulos, V.; Papamanolis, A. BIM-Based Machine Learning Application for Parametric Assessment of Building Energy Performance. Energies 2025, 18, 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18010201.
  • Urzędowski, A.; Sachajdak, A.; Syta, A.; Zaburko, J. CFD and Statistical Analysis of the Impact of Surface Physical Parameters on the Thermal Resistance of Layered Partitions in ETICS Systems. Energies 2025, 18, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18010107.
  • Hurnik, M.; Ciuman, P.; Popiolek, Z. Eddy–Viscosity Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Modeling of Air Distribution in a Sidewall Jet Supplied into a Room. Energies 2024, 17, 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051261.
  • Sadłowska-Sałęga, A.; Wąs, K. Impact of Shading Effect from Nearby Buildings on Energy Demand and Load Calculations for Historic City Centres in Central Europe. Energies 2024, 17, 6400. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246400.
  • Nam, A.; Kim, Y.I. Prioritizing Energy Performance Improvement Factors for Senior Centers Based on Building Energy Simulation and Economic Feasibility. Energies 2024, 17, 5576. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225576.
  • Norouziasl, S.; Vosoughkhosravi, S.; Jafari, A.; Pang, Z. Assessing the Influence of Occupancy Factors on Energy Performance in US Small Office Buildings. Energies 2024, 17, 5277. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215277.

References

  1. Buildings—Energy System. Available online: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings (accessed on 21 September 2025).
  2. Harish, V.S.K.V.; Kumar, A. A Review on Modeling and Simulation of Building Energy Systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 1272–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Negendahl, K. Building Performance Simulation in the Early Design Stage: An Introduction to Integrated Dynamic Models. Autom. Constr. 2015, 54, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Østergård, T.; Jensen, R.L.; Maagaard, S.E. Building Simulations Supporting Decision Making in Early Design—A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 61, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pan, Y.; Zhu, M.; Lv, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Yin, R.; Yang, Y.; Jia, X.; Wang, X.; Zeng, F.; et al. Building Energy Simulation and Its Application for Building Performance Optimization: A Review of Methods, Tools, and Case Studies. Adv. Appl. Energy 2023, 10, 100135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, H.; Zhai, Z. Advances in Building Simulation and Computational Techniques: A Review between 1987 and 2014. Energy Build. 2016, 128, 319–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hong, T.; Chou, S.K.; Bong, T.Y. Building Simulation: An Overview of Developments and Information Sources. Build. Environ. 2000, 35, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wetter, M. Co-Simulation of Building Energy and Control Systems with the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed. J. Build. Perform. Simul. 2011, 4, 185–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ma, Z.; Cooper, P.; Daly, D.; Ledo, L. Existing Building Retrofits: Methodology and State-of-the-Art. Energy Build. 2012, 55, 889–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Crawley, D.B.; Hand, J.W.; Kummert, M.; Griffith, B.T. Contrasting the Capabilities of Building Energy Performance Simulation Programs. Build. Environ. 2008, 43, 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reinhart, C.F.; Cerezo Davila, C. Urban Building Energy Modeling—A Review of a Nascent Field. Build. Environ. 2016, 97, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kontokosta, C.E.; Tull, C. A Data-Driven Predictive Model of City-Scale Energy Use in Buildings. Appl. Energy 2017, 197, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Na, W.; Wang, M. A Bayesian Approach with Urban-Scale Energy Model to Calibrate Building Energy Consumption for Space Heating: A Case Study of Application in Beijing. Energy 2022, 247, 123341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bre, F.; Fachinotti, V.D. A Computational Multi-Objective Optimization Method to Improve Energy Efficiency and Thermal Comfort in Dwellings. Energy Build. 2017, 154, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wetter, M.; Wright, J. A Comparison of Deterministic and Probabilistic Optimization Algorithms for Nonsmooth Simulation-Based Optimization. Build. Environ. 2004, 39, 989–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Griego, D.; Krarti, M.; Hernández-Guerrero, A. Optimization of Energy Efficiency and Thermal Comfort Measures for Residential Buildings in Salamanca, Mexico. Energy Build. 2012, 54, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Agouzoul, A.; Tabaa, M.; Chegari, B.; Simeu, E.; Dandache, A.; Alami, K. Towards a Digital Twin Model for Building Energy Management: Case of Morocco. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 184, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, W.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Tang, S.; Xia, J.; Lv, Z. Deep Learning for Assessment of Environmental Satisfaction Using BIM Big Data in Energy Efficient Building Digital Twins. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 50, 101897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferdyn-Grygierek, J.; Grygierek, K.; Psikuta, A. Building Energy Performance Modelling and Simulation. Energies 2025, 18, 5295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195295

AMA Style

Ferdyn-Grygierek J, Grygierek K, Psikuta A. Building Energy Performance Modelling and Simulation. Energies. 2025; 18(19):5295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferdyn-Grygierek, Joanna, Krzysztof Grygierek, and Agnes Psikuta. 2025. "Building Energy Performance Modelling and Simulation" Energies 18, no. 19: 5295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195295

APA Style

Ferdyn-Grygierek, J., Grygierek, K., & Psikuta, A. (2025). Building Energy Performance Modelling and Simulation. Energies, 18(19), 5295. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop