Next Article in Journal
Bridging Bioenergy and Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Technological Synergies
Previous Article in Journal
An Analytical Method to the Economics of Pumped Storage Power Plants Based on the Real Options Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Large Wind Turbine Designs

DNV, Rivergate 3, Temple Quay, Bristol BS1 6EW, UK
Energies 2025, 18(19), 5292; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195292
Submission received: 19 September 2025 / Accepted: 28 September 2025 / Published: 7 October 2025
The utilization of wind energy across various sectors has increased significantly in recent decades. It is considered one of the most promising clean energy sources and has matured in terms of technological readiness and commercial penetration. In fact, wind energy has experienced the fastest growth compared to other renewable energy sources. Wind energy has clearly become an essential part of human life worldwide and has undergone massive development in various areas [1]. This growth is driven by the ongoing decline of fossil fuel reserves, concerns about a potential energy crisis, energy price volatility, and the growing public awareness of environmentally friendly energy alternatives. There is concern that the ongoing effects of climate change will have significant consequences on ecosystems, healthcare systems, and the general economy in the coming decades [2]. One of the key success factors in wind energy adoption is its maturity in all aspects: research, design, manufacturing, logistics, operation, maintenance, market openness, and regulation. Wind turbine technology is multidisciplinary and has been continuously tested over decades of operation.
As the use of wind energy continues to grow rapidly, it presents new challenges that must be addressed. One major challenge in wind energy development is the availability of space, especially as renewable energy demand continues to rise. In response to this, wind turbine sizes have been increasing considerably in the last decades. Wind turbines have now scaled up to the 10–15 MW range, with rotor diameters exceeding 200 m, and are expected to reach 20+ MW with rotor diameters of over 300 m in the near future. This evolution introduces a whole new set of challenges compared to earlier turbine technologies. For instance, ultra-large wind turbines feature much longer, more slender, and more flexible blades. As the wind turbine size increases, various issues begin to emerge, with one of the most critical being the increased susceptibility to blade instability. Wind turbine technological advancements must keep pace to ensure the safety and structural integrity of these large machines. This directly implies that improvements are needed across multiple areas of wind turbine technology.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced significant growth in its application across various areas in recent years. Its adoption has been remarkably rapid, and the wind energy community is increasingly recognizing the potential of AI. This can be applied to wind turbine designs [3,4,5], enhancing controller robustness [6,7], improving prediction tools and site assessments [8,9,10,11], optimizing/scheduling maintenance [12,13], and managing energy storage systems [14,15,16].
There is a clear trend toward the adoption of AI for advancing wind turbine technology, suggesting that AI could play an important role in the future success story of wind energy. From the brief analysis above, it becomes evident that while large wind turbines certainly pose significant challenges, they also offer substantial opportunities. A key question for the future is: Can AI be effectively leveraged in the development of large wind turbines? This editorial specifically aims to provide a concise overview of AI’s role in large wind turbine designs and to highlight its potential future directions.
In the wind energy sector, AI has naturally found its place—primarily in optimization. This is largely because optimization techniques have been employed in the wind energy field for decades [17,18,19,20]. Therefore, as AI becomes a norm, its integration into the development workflow is a logical progression. Wind turbine and controller designs are typically developed using highly specialized software, often carried out by different companies. For example, while the wind turbine blades and tower might be designed by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM), substructures such as monopiles, jackets, or floating foundations are usually designed by separate companies. One potential role of AI is in improving the protection of intellectual property (IP) across the various stages of the design workflow. Safely sharing these models while protecting the IP remains one of the most challenging bureaucratic tasks in the workflow. One idea is to use AI to replace the turbine structures during the substructure design process. Another potential application is by employing AI in encryption technologies to securely share these models.
AI may also be incorporated to enhance the prediction accuracy for large wind turbines. There is a particular concern regarding the instability of long and flexible blades. Accurate prediction of aerodynamic damping has proven to be vital for reliably estimating the wind turbine loads progression over time [21,22,23]. Progress has been made in predicting instability in wind turbine blades through the development of advanced dynamic stall models, such as the IAG model [24]. This model works well in the common post stall regime at angles of attack ( α ) around ±30° (denoted as stall-induced vibration zone 1, SIV 1), as well as in the reversed flow regime at α around ±160° (referred to stall-induced vibration zone 2, SIV 2). However, there remains gap in engineering modeling when the blade is perpendicular with the inflow at α about ±90° (known as vortex-induced vibration zone, VIV). Performing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for VIV is extremely expensive and not straightforward, which makes it difficult to recreate instability cases. AI could potentially fill this gap by bridging the prediction capabilities between SIV and VIV in engineering models for wind turbines. One promising method is to train AI models using field data to represent various VIV scenarios. AI may also be employed to uncover relationships between spanwise vortex movement during VIV. Further applications of AI include improving engineering sub-correction models, such as three-dimensional blade root polar corrections or modeling approaches for highly loaded rotor cases.
Site-specific wind turbine design workflows may also benefit from AI utilization. There are already documented activities concerning this matter, for instance, using AI to reconstruct wind turbine wakes from sparse sensor data [9,11,25] or wind farm layout analysis [26,27]. Future directions of projects could be aimed at bridging the gap between wind farm level analysis and individual wind turbine loads. Design loads cases (DLCs) governed by standards [28,29] mainly regulate loads assessments for individual wind turbines. However, the impacts of a wind farm on turbine loads are not yet evaluated in great detail [30]. In addition, it is known that generating turbulent wind files is not a trivial task, and matching them with measured timeseries data from the field is even more challenging, especially when accounting for upstream wind turbine wake effects. Based on limited timeseries data, AI could provide the necessary ingredients to reconstruct turbulent wind fields. This can be further adopted in DLC analyses that consider the influence of upstream turbine wakes in a wind farm.

Acknowledgments

The author sincerely acknowledges DNV for the valuable opportunities to collaborate with diverse partners across multiple projects, which have significantly contributed to broadening the perspective necessary for developing the content of this article. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) was employed to perform minor grammatical refinements, but the core ideas and content of the article remain entirely the author’s original work. At last but not least, the author would like to dedicate this paper to IVE as a fellow member of DIVE, their assistance in creating a suitable working environment during the completion of the article is greatly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that the article was written in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. It is declared that the author is an associate editor of Energies, at the time of submission. This has no impact on the final decision.

References

  1. Bangga, G. Progress and outlook in wind energy research. Energies 2022, 15, 6527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bangga, G. Climate change challenge-a wind energy perspective. Front. Energy Res. 2024, 12, 1448211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. De Anda, J.; Ruiz, S.E.; Bojórquez, E.; Inzunza-Aragon, I. Towards optimal reliability-based design of wind turbines towers using artificial intelligence. Eng. Struct. 2023, 294, 116778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, N.; Pan, Q. An application of machine learning techniques in prediction of manufacturing quality of a composite wind turbine blade. Eng. Comput. 2025, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Z.; Zeng, T.; Chu, X.; Xue, D. Multi-objective deep reinforcement learning for optimal design of wind turbine blade. Renew. Energy 2023, 203, 854–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Muñoz-Palomeque, E.; Sierra-García, J.E.; Santos, M. Wind turbine maximum power point tracking control based on unsupervised neural networks. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 2023, 10, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Song, D.; Shen, G.; Huang, C.; Huang, Q.; Yang, J.; Dong, M.; Joo, Y.H.; Duić, N. Review on the application of artificial intelligence methods in the control and design of offshore wind power systems. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, X.; Day, S.; Clelland, D.; Liang, X. Analysis and real-time prediction of the full-scale thrust for floating wind turbine based on artificial intelligence. Ocean Eng. 2019, 175, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Geibel, M.; Bangga, G. Data reduction and reconstruction of wind turbine wake employing data driven approaches. Energies 2022, 15, 3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Dong, M.; Huang, L.; Guo, Y.; He, S. Deep learning-based prediction of wind power for multi-turbines in a wind farm. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 723775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, Z.; Wang, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, J.; Tan, A.C. A reduced order modeling-based machine learning approach for wind turbine wake flow estimation from sparse sensor measurements. Energy 2024, 294, 130772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amini, A.; Kanfoud, J.; Gan, T.H. An artificial intelligence neural network predictive model for anomaly detection and monitoring of wind turbines using scada data. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2022, 36, 2034718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, N.; Woo, J.; Kim, S. A deep reinforcement learning ensemble for maintenance scheduling in offshore wind farms. Appl. Energy 2025, 377, 124431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abdalla, A.N.; Nazir, M.S.; Tao, H.; Cao, S.; Ji, R.; Jiang, M.; Yao, L. Integration of energy storage system and renewable energy sources based on artificial intelligence: An overview. J. Energy Storage 2021, 40, 102811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Talaat, M.; Elkholy, M.; Alblawi, A.; Said, T. Artificial intelligence applications for microgrids integration and management of hybrid renewable energy sources. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023, 56, 10557–10611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lastomo, D.; Setiadi, H.; Bangga, G.; Farid, I.W.; Faisal, M.; Hutomo, P.G.; Syawitri, T.P.; Putra, L.; Hendranata, Y.; Stefanus, K.; et al. Low-Frequency Oscillation Mitigation usin an Optimal Coordination of CES and PSS based on BA. In Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), Malang, Indonesia, 16–18 October 2018; pp. 216–221. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, J.; Dao, M.H.; Le, Q.T. Data-driven modal parameterization for robust aerodynamic shape optimization of wind turbine blades. Renew. Energy 2024, 224, 120115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Herrmann, J.; Bangga, G. Multi-objective optimization of a thick blade root airfoil to improve the energy production of large wind turbines. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2019, 11, 043304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Radi, J.; Sierra-García, J.E.; Santos, M.; Armenta-Déu, C.; Djebli, A. Metaheuristic Optimization of Wind Turbine Airfoils with Maximum-Thickness and Angle-of-Attack Constraints. Energies 2024, 17, 6440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Lei, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Cheng, J.; Gao, S. Reinforcement learning-based particle swarm optimization for wind farm layout problems. Energy 2024, 313, 134050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bangga, G. Sensitivity of dynamic stall models to dynamic excitation on large flexible wind turbine blades in edgewise vibrations. Energies 2025, 18, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, C.; Zhou, J.W.; Li, F.; Zhai, E. Stall-induced vibrations analysis and mitigation of a wind turbine rotor at idling state: Theory and experiment. Renew. Energy 2022, 187, 710–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bangga, G.; Carrion, M.; Collier, W.; Parkinson, S. Technical modeling challenges for large idling wind turbines. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2626, 012026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bangga, G.; Parkinson, S.; Collier, W. Development and validation of the iag dynamic stall model in state-space representation for wind turbine airfoils. Energies 2023, 16, 3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ali, N.; Calaf, M.; Cal, R.B. Clustering sparse sensor placement identification and deep learning based forecasting for wind turbine wakes. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2021, 13, 023307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, K.; Deng, X.; Ti, Z.; Yang, S.; Huang, S.; Wang, Y. A data-driven layout optimization framework of large-scale wind farms based on machine learning. Renew. Energy 2023, 218, 119240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, H.; Xie, J.; Zhao, X. Wind farm control technologies: From classical control to reinforcement learning. Prog. Energy 2022, 4, 032006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. IEC-61400-1:2019; Wind Energy Generation Systems-Part 1: Design Requirements. International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  29. DNV-ST-0437; Loads and Site Conditions for Wind Turbines. Det Norske Veritas: Bærum, Norway, 2021.
  30. Bangga, G.; Bossanyi, E. BladedFarmWake: A framework for evaluating the influence of upstream wakes on turbine loads using Bladed. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2024, 2767, 092025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bangga, G. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Large Wind Turbine Designs. Energies 2025, 18, 5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195292

AMA Style

Bangga G. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Large Wind Turbine Designs. Energies. 2025; 18(19):5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bangga, Galih. 2025. "Role of Artificial Intelligence in Large Wind Turbine Designs" Energies 18, no. 19: 5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195292

APA Style

Bangga, G. (2025). Role of Artificial Intelligence in Large Wind Turbine Designs. Energies, 18(19), 5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop