Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Bioclimatic Building Design: Innovations in Sustainability and Efficiency
Abstract
1. Introduction
Methodology
2. Main Principles and Strategies of Bioclimatic Building Design
- Shading and Solar Control: In warm climates, passive shading devices—such as overhangs, louvers, and pergolas-along with vegetative solutions like green walls, are employed to reduce excessive solar exposure and mitigate overheating [15].
- Thermal Insulation: Effective insulation, reflective materials, and high-performance windows, significantly reduce heat transfer—lowering energy consumption by up to 60% and ensuring thermal stability [8].
- Rainwater Harvesting and Greywater Recycling: Rainwater harvesting, greywater recycling, and water features reduce potable water use and contribute to passive cooling [13].
3. Artificial Intelligence Evolution, Techniques and Application in AEC
3.1. Artificial Intelligence Techniques
3.1.1. Machine Learning (ML)
- Supervised Learning: The model is trained using labeled data (input-output pairs), where the desired output is known. The model learns to map inputs to correct outputs. This branch of ML includes methods like Linear Regression, Bayesian network, K-nearest neighbors (kNN), Decision Tree, etc.
- Unsupervised Learning: The model is trained using unlabeled data, meaning the system must identify patterns or groupings on its own. The algorithm must find structure or patterns in the input data without guidance. The main goal of unsupervised learning is to explore the data and extract useful insights. This includes Fuzzy C Means, Balanced Iterative Reducing and Clustering using Hierarchies (BIRCH) and K-Means.
- Reinforcement Learning: The system learns by interacting with its environment and receiving feedback in the form of rewards or penalties, optimizing its behavior over time: Q-Learning, Markov decision process [26].
3.1.2. Deep Learning (DL)
- Discriminative (Supervised) models: focus on learning the boundary between different classes in a dataset, rather than modeling data distribution. These supervised deep models typically estimate class probabilities from observable data, enabling accurate classification. In simple terms, discriminative models learn to distinguish between different categories or labels by focusing on the differences in the corresponding data. Common models include Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and their variations. The most powerful class of this type is CNNs, which are extensively used across a range of tasks, such as object detection, speech recognition, computer vision, image classification, and bioinformatics by learning hierarchical features from raw data.
- Generative (Unsupervised) models: The primary objective of generative models (GMs) is to produce data resembling real-world distributions. Despite ongoing research challenges, recent advancements have expanded their applications, particularly in computer vision research. GMs utilize training data from an unknown data-generating distribution to create new samples that match the original distribution. Key models include Auto-Encoder, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM), and Deep Belief Network (DBN) [28].
4. AI in Bioclimatic Building Design
4.1. AI, Sustainable Building Design, and Construction 4.0 and 5.0
4.2. Recent AI Techniques and Combination Technologies in AEC
4.2.1. Building Design
4.2.2. Construction
4.2.3. Operation
5. AI-Driven Digital Twins
5.1. Digital Twin System Architecture
- Data Acquisition: This layer collects dynamic data from the physical environment through IoT sensors that detect changes in physical, chemical, and electrical properties of the surroundings (temperature, humidity, gas concentrations, light intensity, motion, etc.), producing an electrical output in response. Input from various sensors can be collected by the more advanced control systems like Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system for HVAC plants, Direct Digital Control (DDC) system, etc. These technologies include ultrasonic and gyroscopic sensors, which are used to detect clashes, track machinery locations, and ensure accurate placement of resources on construction sites. While building surveillance systems with video streams detect pedestrians and measure environmental conditions like ambient brightness and surface temperatures using thermal imaging modules [37].
- Data Transmission: Raw data from the data acquisition layer is transmitted to other system components via wired or wireless technologies (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, WLAN and Ultra-Wideband (UWB)), following communication protocols like Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) or Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP). Building Management Systems (BMS) use the internet and Building Automation and Control Networks (BACnet) protocols for data communication between devices and sensors. Additionally, platforms like SophyAI and Gazebo-ROS are utilized for visualizing and processing sensor data [37].
- Digital Modeling: Virtual models of the physical environment are created using technologies like laser scanning, photogrammetry, and software tools (Autodesk Revit, Navisworks, Solidworks, etc.) to capture and represent parameters such as geometry, functionality, location, and performance. Additionally, game development software like Unity 3D is employed for creating interactive 3D models, avatars, and virtual environments (e.g., Virtual Reality setups with Oculus devices by Meta Platforms, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) [9,35]. Specifically, Autodesk defines five levels of digital twins in the AEC sector, each with a distinct function: Descriptive, Informative, Predictive, Comprehensive and Autonomous. Currently, most DT applications are at Level 2 (Informative Twin), with some moving toward Level 3 (Predictive Twin) (Figure 7) [38].
- Data/Model Integration: Multi-source, high-volume data is stored in cloud platforms like Google Cloud Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web service (AWS). Some systems also use mirrored databases to store data from existing building systems like BMS. Data fusion techniques integrate various data types (e.g., sensor, mechanical, and image/video data) into a unified digital twin model, often utilizing customized Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). Platforms like Autodesk Revit, Unity 3D, and Midas Gen are used for this integration, enabling real-time updates and the fusion of multi-form data into BIM or other virtual environments. Advanced AI technologies process this data for insights and predictive analysis. The processed data then is visualized in digital twin systems through various software platforms, primarily 3D modeling tools like Autodesk Revit, Autodesk Navisworks, Unity 3D, Virtual and Augmented Reality [37].
- Service: Represents the range of services it provides to users, and these services vary depending on the specific application context. It enables real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, early issue detection, and data visualization, supporting decision-making and operational efficiency. It tracks structural assets, construction activities, and environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, energy consumption, occupancy) while identifying faults in building systems, forecasting failures, and triggering alarms for anomalies. Additionally, digital twins facilitate scenario simulations, robotic control, and smart home management [37].
5.2. The Role of Digital Twins in Bioclimatic Design
6. Future Perspectives of AI in AEC Industry and Sustainable Building Design
- High Initial Costs: AI-driven tools such as BIM, generative design, and automation demand substantial upfront investment, posing financial challenges. Adopting tools like BIM integrated with AI, deploying AI-powered energy management systems like urban multi-energy systems (UMES) DTs, or investing in robotic construction technologies involve significant costs for hardware, software, and training. These financial barriers can be especially challenging for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Financial incentives, government subsidies, and demonstrated long-term return on investment (ROI) could facilitate wider adoption. However, the hidden costs associated with AI adoption, such as system customization, integration with existing infrastructure, and ongoing maintenance, must also be considered [2,29].
- Data Transmission and Security: AI applications in construction heavily rely on data from various sources, including sensor networks, environmental data, construction schedules, and building materials. The data generated in these systems often includes heterogeneous types, such as image data, video data, mechanical data, and environmental data. In terms of data transmission, most studies nowadays have focused on short-range wireless technologies, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and UWB. Moreover, ensuring secure data transmission is a key consideration. Many construction-related data are confidential, and the transmission of such sensitive information can expose the system to cyber-attacks. A breach in these systems could have far-reaching consequences, including compromising building safety, exposing sensitive data, or disrupting critical infrastructure. Future research should focus on privacy-preserving network models and secure data exchange mechanisms [37].
- Data Integration and Compatibility: The AEC industry struggles with fragmented, inconsistent, and siloed data across various stages of a building’s lifecycle. Construction projects typically involve numerous stakeholders using different software platforms, which complicates system interoperability [29]. This data often comes from multiple sources, including design models (e.g., BIM), building materials, construction schedules, sensor networks, and environmental data from IoT devices, which can be incompatible or poorly organized. This lack of integration often leads to delays, cost overruns, and project disruptions. Open-source platforms, standardized interfaces, and semantic web technologies can enhance interoperability. Additionally, collaborative approaches, such as BIM and Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), can streamline workflows, improve coordination, and enhance overall project delivery) [1,2,37].
- Integration of AR and VR for Data Processing and Visualization: In terms of data visualization, the use of 3D modeling platforms, along with immersive technologies like Virtual and Augmented Reality, has advanced the visualization and interaction with digital twin data, driving increasing interest in their integration within Intelligent DSS for construction engineering. These technologies provide interactive and immersive experiences that improve spatial comprehension, collaboration and enhance decision-making but face usability and cost barriers. User-friendly solutions, real-time synchronization with BIM and cost-effective solutions are needed for widespread adoption in the AEC sector [1,37].
- Scalability and Standardization: While AI-driven solutions show significant potential in individual construction projects, scaling these solutions across entire industries and supply chains presents a distinct challenge. The construction industry’s diversity, characterized by varying regulations, building codes, materials, and construction techniques, complicates the widespread implementation of AI solutions without considerable customization. AI adoption is hindered by industry diversity, varying regulations, and a lack of standardized protocols. Unlike industries such as healthcare, which have established broad standards like HL7, or manufacturing with ISO 9000, the construction sector lacks cohesive frameworks for data exchange, interoperability, and quality assurance. Establishing industry-wide frameworks is essential for interoperability and efficiency [1,29].
- Continuous Learning and Adaptation: Studies have shown benefits of DSS in areas like project scheduling, risk management, and material selection. Online learning algorithms in risk management, allowing the system to adjust to evolving risk profiles and enhance decision-making. Meanwhile, machine learning for material selection, enabling the system to learn and refine recommendations based on feedback and new data. DSS enhance project management but require reliable data access and scalable algorithms [1].
- Explainability and Transparency: AI models, particularly those using deep learning, often operate as “black boxes” where their decision-making processes are not transparent or understandable to humans. AI decision-making must be interpretable to ensure trust and accountability. The field of explainable artificial intelligence aims to address this issue by creating models that provide clear, understandable explanations for their decisions. XAI frameworks should balance accuracy and interpretability [21].
- Environmental Impact: As AI systems grow in sophistication, they require massive computational resources, which translates to a substantial environmental impact. AI models require significant computational resources, contributing to a high energy demand and carbon footprint. Sustainable AI practices, data optimization, and governance frameworks should be prioritized [46,47]. In this context, the concept of Net Zero Energy Data Centers (NZEDC) encapsulates key sustainability strategies, defined by the RenewIT project (Deliverable 4.5) as data centers that achieve a net-zero balance by exclusively consuming renewable energy while generating an equivalent amount of electrical and thermal energy over their operational lifespan [18].
- Regulatory and Ethical Considerations: AI systems, which can significantly impact society, the economy, and individual lives, require robust frameworks to ensure they are developed and deployed responsibly. Design teams often lack regulatory support documents with performance benchmarks for non-mechanical solutions, unlike mechanical systems (e.g., HVAC, heat pumps) validated by European standards (Delegated Regulation 2022/759; Commission, 2014). These benchmarks are crucial for assessing energy savings and comfort across climates [12]. Moreover, AI governance must address fairness, transparency, and human oversight. According to the AI Index Report 2024, in 2023, policymakers in both the European Union and the United States made significant strides in AI regulation [22]. The European Union’s AI Act and similar frameworks emphasize ethical AI development [25].
- Skill Gaps and Workforce Adaptation: AI adoption in the AEC sector requires significant workforce reskilling to bridge the technical expertise gap. While AI can greatly enhance efficiency, it may reduce the need for certain manual tasks, leading to potential workforce displacement. This raises important ethical concerns about balancing the benefits of automation with the preservation of employment opportunities [33]. In addition, many professionals in construction lack the technical expertise required to effectively use AI tools, which demand knowledge in areas like machine learning, data analytics, robotics, and programming. Building and deploying AI solutions in construction require specialized knowledge, and there is currently a large gap between the demand for AI talent and the availability of qualified professionals. Talent development and collaborative training programs are essential to prepare professionals for AI-driven roles [2,29].
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
AEC | Architecture, Engineering and Construction |
DT | Digital Twin |
SDG | Sustainable Development Goals |
ML | Machine Learning |
DL | Deep Learning |
EPBD | Revised Energy Performance of Buildings Directive |
GAN | Generative Adversal Networks |
IoT | Internet of Things |
GPU | Graphic Processing Units |
TPU | Tensor Processing Units |
XAI | Explainable Artificial Intelligence |
EU | Europian Union |
kNN | k-Nearest Neighbors |
BIRCH | Balanced Iterative Reducing and Clustering using Hierarchies |
NLP | Natural Language Processing |
ANN | Artificial Neural Networks |
MLP | Multi-Layer Perception |
CNN | Convolutional Neural Networks |
RNN | Recurent Neural Networks |
GM | Generative Models |
GAN | Generative Adversal Network |
RBM | Restricted Boltzman Machine |
DBN | Deep Belief Network |
NHE | Natural Hazards Engineering |
CAD | Computer-Aided Design |
BIM | Building Information Modeling |
DSS | Decision Support Systems |
RFID | Radio-Frequency Identification |
BPM | Building Performance Monitoring |
SHM | Structural Health Monitoring |
KBE | Knowledge-Based Engineering |
SM | Surrogate model |
HVAC | Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditionig |
AR | Augmented Reality |
VR | Vurtual Reality |
SCADA | Supervisory Control and Data Acquistion |
DDC | Direct Digital Control |
WLAN | Wireless Local Area Network |
UWB | Ultra-Wideband |
MQTT | Message Queuing Telemetry Transport |
HTTP | Hypertext Transfer Protocol |
BMS | Building Management Systems |
AWS | Amazon Web Service |
API | Application Programming Interface |
PCM | Phase-Changing Material |
PMV | Predicted Mean Vote |
PPD | Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied |
HBIM | Heritage Building Information Modeling |
UMES | Urban Multi-Energy Systems |
SME | Medium-Sized Enterprise |
ROI | Return on Investment |
IPD | Integrated Project Delivery |
NZEDC | Net Zero Energy Data Center |
References
- Waqar, A. Intelligent decision support systems in construction engineering: An artificial intelligence and machine learning approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 249, 123503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adewale, B.A.; Ene, V.O.; Ogunbayo, B.F.; Aigbavboa, C.O. A Systematic Review of the Applications of AI in a Sustainable Building’s Lifecycle. Buildings 2024, 14, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regona, M.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Hon, C.; Teo, M. Artificial intelligence and sustainable development goals: Systematic literature review of the construction industry. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 108, 105499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mejía-Parada, C.; Mora-Ruiz, V.; Attia, S. Bioclimatic design recommendations for novel cluster analysis-based mapping for humid climates with altitudinal gradient variations. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 82, 108262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elaouzy, Y.; El Fadar, A. Impact of key bioclimatic design strategies on buildings’ performance in dominant climates worldwide. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2022, 68, 532–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2020; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Nairobi, Kenya, 2020; Available online: https://globalabc.org/resources/publications/2020-global-status-report-buildings-and-construction (accessed on 5 November 2024).
- Barea, G.; Mercado, M.V.; Filippín, C.; Monteoliva, J.M.; Villalba, A. New paradigms in bioclimatic design toward climatic change in arid environments. Energy Build. 2022, 266, 112100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elaouzy, Y.; El Fadar, A. Sustainability of building-integrated bioclimatic design strategies depending on energy affordability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 179, 113295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elwy, I.; Hagishima, A. The artificial intelligence reformation of sustainable building design approach: A systematic review on building design optimization methods using surrogate models. Energy Build. 2024, 323, 114769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahinmoghadam, M.; Natephra, W.; Motamedi, A. BIM- and IoT-based virtual reality tool for real-time thermal comfort assessment in building enclosures. Build. Environ. 2021, 199, 107905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Union. Directive (EU) 2024/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Energy Performance of Buildings (Recast); Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2024; Available online: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/energy-performance-buildings-directive_en (accessed on 5 November 2024).
- López Plazas, F.; Crespo Sánchez, E.; González Ruiz, P. Bioclimatic strategies in existing multifamily buildings to achieve cities decarbonization goals: Potential and relevance for Catalonia climates. Cities 2024, 154, 105335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozarisoy, B.; Altan, H. Systematic literature review of bioclimatic design elements: Theories, methodologies, and cases in the South-Eastern Mediterranean climate. Energy Build. 2021, 250, 111281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Couvelas, A. Bioclimatic building design theory and application. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 44, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xhexhi, K.; Aliaj, B. Modular construction and bioclimatic strategies: A sustainable approach to building design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Scientific and Academic Research, Konya, Turkey, 19–20 July 2024; All Sciences Academy: Konya, Turkey, 2024. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382561521 (accessed on 5 November 2024).
- Mazzeo, D.; Matera, N.; Peri, G.; Scaccianoce, G. Forecasting green roofs’ potential in improving building thermal performance and mitigating urban heat island in the Mediterranean area: An artificial intelligence-based approach. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 222, 119879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skandalos, N.; Karamanis, D. Decarbonizing Operational Emissions in Urban Neighborhoods with the Integration of Rooftop Photovoltaics and Green Infrastructure under Current and Future Climate Conditions. Energy Build. 2025, 329, 115306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manganelli, M.; Soldati, A.; Martirano, L.; Ramakrishna, S. Strategies for Improving the Sustainability of Data Centers via Energy Mix, Energy Conservation, and Circular Energy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffmann, C.H. Is AI intelligent? An assessment of artificial intelligence, 70 years after Turing. Technol. Soc. 2022, 68, 101893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmaja-Chinimilli, V.R.; Sadasivuni, L.N.; Gouthami, L.A.; Priyanka, K.B. The rise of AI: A comprehensive research review. IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell. 2024, 13, 2226–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, L.; Brcic, M.; Cabitza, F.; Choi, J.; Confalonieri, R.; Del Ser, J.; Guidotti, R.; Hayashi, Y.; Herrera, F.; Holzinger, A.; et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A manifesto of open challenges and interdisciplinary research directions. Inf. Fusion 2024, 106, 102301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- HAI, Stanford University. Artificial Intelligence Index Report; Stanford University: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2024; Available online: https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/ (accessed on 2 December 2024).
- European Commission. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai (accessed on 10 December 2024).
- European Commission. Artificial Intelligence Act 2024; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2024; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206 (accessed on 10 December 2024).
- Díaz-Rodríguez, N.; Del Ser, J.; Coeckelbergh, M.; López de Prado, M.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Inf. Fusion. 2023, 99, 101896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellini, V.; Cascella, M.; Cutugno, F.; Russo, M.; Lanza, R.; Compagnone, C.; Bignami, E. Understanding basic principles of Artificial Intelligence: A practical guide for intensivists. Acta Bio. Med. 2022, 93, e2022297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krausková, V.; Pifko, H. Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Sustainable Architecture: Current Knowledge. Archit. Pap. Fac. Archit. Des. STU 2021, 26, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortezapour Shiri, F.; Perumal, T.; Mustapha, N.; Mohamed, R. A comprehensive overview and comparative analysis on deep learning models. J. Artif. Intell. 2024, 6, 301–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rane, N. Integrating Leading-Edge Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and Big Data Technologies for Smart and Sustainable Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry: Challenges and Future Directions. Int. J. Data Sci. Big Data Anal. 2023, 3, 73–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deierlein, G.G.; Zsarnóczay, Á. (Eds.) State of the Art in Computational Simulation for Natural Hazards Engineering, 2nd ed.; Report Number 2021-01; Zenodo: Genève, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olawade, D.B.; Wada, O.Z.; Ige, A.O.; Egbewole, B.I.; Olajo, A.; Oladapo, B.I. Artificial intelligence in environmental monitoring: Advancements, challenges, and future directions. Hyg. Environ. Health Adv. 2024, 12, 100114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro Pena, M.L.; Carballal, A.; Rodríguez-Fernández, N.; Santos, I.; Romero, J. Artificial intelligence applied to conceptual design: A review of its use in architecture. Autom. Constr. 2021, 124, 103550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Wang, B.; Li, X.; Zheng, P.; Mourtzis, D.; Wang, L. Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 64, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilner, E.; Galuszka, A.; Grychowski, T. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Building Design—Optimisation Methods. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), Międzyzdroje, Poland, 26–29 August 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziarati, T.; Hedayat, S.; Moscatiello, C.; Sappa, G.; Manganelli, M. Overview of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Future of Renewable Energy. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2024 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Rome, Italy, 17–20 June 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, R.; Torres-Aguilar, C.E.; Sheikh, N.A.; Ahmad, T.; Xamán, J.; Bassam, A. Data engineering for digital twining and optimization of naturally ventilated solar façade with phase changing material under global projection scenarios. Renew. Energy 2022, 187, 1184–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuhaise, V.V.; Tah, J.H.M.; Abanda, F.H. Technologies for digital twin applications in construction. Autom. Constr. 2023, 152, 104931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osama, Z. The digital twin framework: A roadmap to the development of user-centred digital twin in the built environment. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 98, 111081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, R.; Bassam, A.; Orozco-del-Castillo, M.G.; Ricalde, L.J.; Carvente, O. Sustainability framework of intelligent social houses with a synergy of double-façade architecture and active air conditioning systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 288, 117120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koirala, B.; Cai, H.; Khayatian, F.; Munoz, E.; An, J.G.; Mutschler, R.; Sulzer, M.; De Wolf, C.; Orehounig, K. Digitalization of urban multi-energy systems—Advances in digital twin applications across life-cycle phases. Adv. Appl. Energy 2024, 16, 100196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Oh, J.; Bartos, M. Stormwater digital twin with online quality control detects urban flood hazards under uncertainty. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 118, 105982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifi, A.; Tarlani Beris, A.; Sharifzadeh Javidi, A.; Nouri, M.; Gholizadeh Lonbar, A.; Ahmadi, M. Application of artificial intelligence in digital twin models for stormwater infrastructure systems in smart cities. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2024, 61, 102485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.; Huang, Q.; Yu, M. Advancements in remote sensing for active fire detection: A review of datasets and methods. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 943, 173273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugiyama, G.; Bourgeois, I.; Rodrigues, H. A holistic methodology for the assessment of Heritage Digital Twin applied to Portuguese case studies. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2025, 36, e00390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Chai, B.; Li, J. ArtDiff: Integrating IoT and AI to enhance precision in ancient mural restoration. Alex. Eng. J. 2025, 111, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Wynsberghe, A. Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI. AI Ethics 2021, 1, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.J.; Raghavendra, R.; Gupta, U.; Acun, B.; Maeng, K.; Chang, G.; Aga, F.; Huang, J.; Bai, C.; Gschwind, M.; et al. Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities. Proc. Mach. Learn. Syst. 2022, 4, 795–813. [Google Scholar]
Building Design | Construction | Operation |
---|---|---|
Big Data | Intelligent Decision Support Systems (DSS) | Building Performance Monitoring (BPM) |
Generative design | Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) | Predictive Analytics |
Surrogate Modeling | Computer Vision Systems | Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) |
Augmented Reality | Iot Devices | Smart Building Systems |
Virtual Reality | Construction Robots |
AI Technique | Lifecycle Stage (Phase) | Typical Measurable Metrics | Impacts Mechanism | Observed/Reported Impacts | Evidence Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Big Data/Data-driven design | Design/ Operation | Energy use (kWh/m2·year), daylighting, embodied carbon, waste reduction (%) | Aggregates climate, usage, material and sensor data for parametric/simulation-driven choices. | Energy demand reductions up to 15–25% through climate-responsive layouts and daylighting optimization; waste reduction ~10–15% in case studies [2,29]. | Review/Meta- analysis |
Generative design (GANs, paremetric search) | Design | Annual energy %, solar gain, WWR, material use | Generates multiple alternatives constrained by performance goals. | Case studies show 20–30% improvement in daylighting; orientation optimization reduced heating/cooling load by up to 22% [2,27,32]. | Simulation/Case study |
Surogate modeling/surrogate-assisted optimization | Design | Optimization time, predicted energy use, thermal comfort (PMV/PPD) | ML surrogates replicate physics-based models at lower cost. | Reduced simulation time by 70–90% while maintaining <5% error; HVAC energy savings potential 12–18% [9,16]. | Simulation/Case study |
KBW, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms and neural networks | Design | Multi-objective scores, iteration time, compliance rate | Encodes expert heuristics and evolutionary optimization for tradeoffs. | Reported 15–20% faster design cycles, compliance with energy codes improved by >10% [26,34]. | Review/Simulation |
AR/VR | Design/ Construction | RFI count, stakeholder approval time, coordination errors | Enables immersive design review and collaboration. | Reduced design change orders by ~20%; decision-making time cut by 30–40% in pilot projects [10,29]. | Simulation/Case study; some empirical pilots |
Decision Support Systems (DSS) | Construction | Cost overrun %, delay %, resource efficiency | Uses predictive analytics to optimize resource allocation. | Case studies report up to 15% cost savings and 10–12% reduction in project delays [1,29]. | Simulation/Case study |
Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) and IoT (logistics) | Construction | Inventory loss %, waste, delivery lateness | Tracks materials/equipment, prevents losses, supports circular flows. | Field tests show 8–12% material waste reduction and improved inventory accuracy >95% [29,36]. | Empirical/Field |
Compute Vision systems (inspection) | Construction/Operation | Defect detection rate, rework %, safety incidents | Automated defect and safety compliance detection. | Achieved >90% defect detection accuracy; reduced manual inspection time by 40–50% [3,29]. | Empirical/Field |
Construction robots/automation | Construction | Productivity, labor hours saved, material tolerance, waste % | Automates repetitive/manual tasks. | Increased bricklaying/3D printing productivity by 2–3×; waste reduced by 15–20% [29]. | Empirical/Field |
Building Performance Modelling and Smart Building Systems | Operation | Energy use, peak demand, IEQ, occupant satisfaction | IoT + ML for real-time system adjustments. | Real buildings show 10–25% operational energy savings, improved occupant comfort (PMV closer to neutral) [2,35]. | Empirical/Field |
Predictive Analytics | Operation | MTBF, downtime, maintenance savings, forecast error | Forecasts failures and renewable output for proactive planning. | Case studies report 30–40% reduction in unplanned downtime, renewable forecasting error reduced to <10% RMSE [3,35]. | Empirical/Field |
Structural Helth Monitoring (SHM)/Digital Twins | Operation/Asset management | Damage detection time, RUL accuracy, alerts | Continuous sensing and digital twin analysis for early anomaly detection. | Detected structural anomalies weeks earlier than manual inspection; improved RUL prediction accuracy by 20–25% [37,38]. | Empirical/Field (pilots); Review |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Filippova, E.; Hedayat, S.; Ziarati, T.; Manganelli, M. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Bioclimatic Building Design: Innovations in Sustainability and Efficiency. Energies 2025, 18, 5230. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195230
Filippova E, Hedayat S, Ziarati T, Manganelli M. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Bioclimatic Building Design: Innovations in Sustainability and Efficiency. Energies. 2025; 18(19):5230. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195230
Chicago/Turabian StyleFilippova, Ekaterina, Sattar Hedayat, Tina Ziarati, and Matteo Manganelli. 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Bioclimatic Building Design: Innovations in Sustainability and Efficiency" Energies 18, no. 19: 5230. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195230
APA StyleFilippova, E., Hedayat, S., Ziarati, T., & Manganelli, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins for Bioclimatic Building Design: Innovations in Sustainability and Efficiency. Energies, 18(19), 5230. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195230