Next Article in Journal
Effect of Axial and Lateral Magnetic Field Configurations on Heat Transfer in Mixed Convection Ferrofluid Flow
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Tuned Mass Damper for Offshore Wind Turbine Using Coupled Fatigue Analysis Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on the Liquid Helium Insulation Characteristics of an Experimental System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Advances in Oil, Gas and Geothermal Reservoirs: 2nd Edition

Faculty of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China
Energies 2025, 18(18), 4789; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184789
Submission received: 27 August 2025 / Accepted: 8 September 2025 / Published: 9 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Oil, Gas and Geothermal Reservoirs: 2nd Edition)
Oil, gas, and geothermal resources, including conventional fossil fuels (oil and natural gas) and unconventional resources (geothermal, shale gas, and tight oil), are key to meeting global energy demands [1,2]. These resources are divided into extractive (e.g., hydrocarbons) and renewable (e.g., geothermal) sources, both essential for sustaining energy systems and supporting environmental sustainability [3,4].
The exploitation of unconventional and depleted reservoirs—particularly heavy oil formations and tight reservoirs—represents a critical frontier in modern hydrocarbon production [5,6]. Improved oil recovery (IOR) techniques, such as thermal stimulation for viscous crude and advanced conformance control (e.g., water shutoff and profile modification), are essential to maximize extraction from challenging reserves with minimal energy expenditure [7,8,9,10,11]. Innovations like steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and cost-effective hydraulic fracturing have significantly improved the economic viability of unconventional plays [12,13,14,15,16]. As reservoirs age, optimizing waterflood management, reservoir characterization, and recovery rates remains a focal point of research [17,18,19,20].
The integration of big data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming upstream operations [21,22]. Machine learning-based predictive models and real-time surveillance systems enable production optimization, hazard mitigation, and performance enhancement, while concurrently addressing challenges in reservoir stewardship and cost optimization. AI-powered decision-support tools further facilitate operational efficiency gains and lifecycle cost reductions [23,24].
Gas storage and sequestration technologies are crucial for resource management and reducing environmental impacts [25,26]. Storing natural gas and injecting CO2 underground helps cut greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change. Advanced methods for CO2 or H2 sequestration in depleted oil and gas fields and saline aquifers are key to meeting climate goals [27]. These technologies are evolving rapidly, with innovations in modeling, monitoring, and safety assurance.
This collection, which is in conversation with the Special Issue of Energies, emphasizes fundamental innovations and has compiled eight new publications on the original application of new ideas and on methodologies that will lead to new advances in oil, gas, and geothermal reservoirs.
The papers are organized into three major directions: development of mature and unconventional reservoirs, big data and artificial intelligence in oil and gas fields, and gas storage and sequestration technologies. Below, we provide an overview of the core findings from each paper, organized by these thematic categories.
The first category focuses on the challenges and innovations associated with improving recovery in both conventional and unconventional oil reservoirs, including heavy oil fields and water-flooded mature fields. Yu et al. [28] investigate the microscopic flow channels in ultra-high water-cut reservoirs of the Shengli Oilfield. Their study visualizes the evolution of water flooding in reservoirs, highlighting how the dominant flow channels and residual oil distribution evolve as the water cut increases. Their research indicates that strategic adjustments in liquid extraction and flow direction can enhance oil recovery, especially in the later stages of ultra-high water-cut development, achieving an impressive recovery rate of 68.02%. This study offers valuable insights for optimizing water flooding practices in mature oilfields.
In recent years, the development of heavy oil reservoirs has gained significant attention. Tian et al. [29] investigated the changes in the thermal and physical properties of reservoir rock surfaces during the pre-heating phase of SAGD. Fu et al. [30] investigate supercritical multicomponent thermal fluids (scMCTF) for offshore heavy oil recovery. Their research reveals that the composition of thermal fluids, especially the ratio of water to organic matter, significantly impacts the recovery efficiency. By exploring reaction conditions, they find that crude oil can be effectively used instead of diesel to generate supercritical fluids, with notable economic and technical advantages. This opens new possibilities for improving thermal recovery in offshore heavy oil reservoirs. Yang et al. [31] build upon the previous study with a focus on optimizing the composition and injection rate of scMCTF for offshore heavy oil recovery. Through molecular simulation, they identify how factors such as temperature, pressure, and organic matter concentration influence the yield and composition of the thermal fluids. They propose a model for controlling the injection rate and fluid composition, providing an effective approach to enhancing the thermal recovery of heavy oil. Zhang et al. [32] examine the influence of reaction conditions on the yield of scMCTF. Their findings suggest that temperature, reaction time, and catalyst concentration have a positive correlation with product yield, while the raw material concentration negatively affects the production rate. This study contributes to the understanding of how various factors influence the efficiency of supercritical fluid generation in oil recovery.
The second category emphasizes the integration of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to optimize production in oil and gas fields, particularly through predictive modeling and fault detection. Zhang et al. [33] developed a data-driven natural gas production prediction model for volcanic reservoirs. By considering multiple factors such as formation pressure, effective reservoir thickness, and gas well production data, they establish a predictive model with high accuracy (R2 = 0.99). This model provides valuable tools for optimizing gas production in volcanic reservoirs, enabling more efficient resource management. Zhang et al. [34] also contribute to AI applications in oil production by developing a hybrid AI model for fault prediction in rod pumping systems. Using deep learning algorithms, their model achieves a remarkable prediction accuracy of 98.61%, significantly improving the reliability and safety of rod pumping operations in Xinjiang Oilfield. The study underscores the potential of AI in enhancing production efficiency and reducing downtime due to mechanical failures.
The third category focuses on advancements in gas storage, particularly for the purposes of sequestration, which is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Chen et al. [35] provide insights into the design and performance of a liquid helium Dewar system for thermal insulation. While not directly related to gas sequestration, the study’s findings on thermal efficiency and heat leakage in cryogenic storage systems could have implications for gas storage technologies, especially in the context of developing more efficient storage solutions for gases like CO2.
This second edition of New Advances in Oil, Gas and Geothermal Reservoirs highlights key advancements in the development of mature and unconventional (especially heavy oil) reservoirs, the application of big data and artificial intelligence in oil and gas fields, and innovative gas storage and sequestration technologies. The contributions presented in this issue offer new insights into enhancing recovery from challenging reservoirs, optimizing field operations through data-driven approaches, and advancing gas storage methods. These breakthroughs provide valuable knowledge to support the efficient and sustainable management of energy resources, guiding future research and industrial applications in the evolving energy landscape.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guo, S.; Zhu, D. Mini-Review of Black Nanosheets for Enhanced Oil Recovery Used in Low-Permeability/Ultra-Low-Permeability Reservoirs. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 16768–16793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, P.; Ren, Z.-L.; Fu, J.-H.; Bao, H.-P.; Xiao, H.; Shi, Z.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Liu, W.-H.; Li, W.-H. A tectono-thermal perspective on the petroleum generation, accumulation and preservation in the southern Ordos Basin, North China. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 1459–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Davoodi, S.; Thanh, H.V.; Wood, D.A.; Mehrad, M.; Muravyov, S.V.; Rukavishnikov, V.S. Carbon dioxide storage and cumulative oil production predictions in unconventional reservoirs applying optimized machine-learning models. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, 296–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, H.-C.; Tang, Y.; He, Y.-W.; Qin, Y.; Luo, J.-H.; Sun, Y.; Wang, N.; Wang, D.-Q. Hydrocarbon gas huff-n-puff optimization of multiple horizontal wells with complex fracture networks in the M unconventional reservoir. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 1018–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, Y.-J.; Wan, Y.-Y.; Tian, Y.; Mu, H.-M.; Zhang, T.-G. Biomass thermal decomposition induced hydrogen sulfide blooming in thermal recovery reservoirs. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, 1802–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tan, Q.-Z.; Liu, S.-Y.; Wang, Y.-J.; Li, H.-Y.; Liu, J.-R.; Sun, W.-Y. A dual-model dual-grid upscaling method for solid-based thermal-reactive-compositional flow simulations in fractured oil shale reservoirs. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, 2478–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, S.; Cheng, H.-B.; Tan, H.-G.; Li, H.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Y.-Q.; Zhu, D.-Y. Huff-n-puff recovery performance and mechanism analysis of black nanosheets in low-permeability reservoirs based on NMR technology. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, 2992–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, D.; Guo, S.; Lu, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Y.; Tan, H.; Cheng, H.; Li, H. Influence of Injection Parameters of Black Nanosheets on Enhancing Oil Recovery Performance in Low-Permeability Reservoirs. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 6241–6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, A.B.; Hamza, A.; Almakimi, A.A.; Saad, M.; Hussein, I.A.; Bai, B. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based preformed particle gels for water management in oil and gas reservoirs. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2024, 241, 213164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elaf, R.; Hamza, A.; Nimir, H.; Saad, M.; Hussein, I.A.; Bai, B. Development of inorganically cross-linked Sulfonated Polyacrylamide Preformed particle gels for Conformance Control: Impact of anionic groups. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 2883–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alotibi, A.; Song, T.; Bai, B.; Schuman, T. Transport and Plugging Performance Evaluation of a Novel Recrosslinkable Microgel Used for Conformance Control in Mature Oil Fields with Superpermeable Channels. SPE J. 2025, 30, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, J.-X.; Li, S.-F.; Li, Q.-F.; Yan, F.; Zhou, Q.-L.; Ma, S.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Zhao, S.-Q.; Shi, Q. Characterization of chemical composition of high viscosity heavy oils: Macroscopic properties, and semi-quantitative analysis of molecular composition using high-resolution mass spectrometry. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 3612–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lei, X.-T.; Ahmadi, M.; Chen, Z. Molecular insights into oil detachment from hydrophobic quartz surfaces in clay-hosted nanopores during steam–surfactant co-injection. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 2457–2468. [Google Scholar]
  14. BinDahbag, M.; Atta, D.; Bagherzadeh, H.; Nath, D.; Ateeq, M.; Kheirollahi, S.; Bamzad, S.; Turkman, S.; Kamal, B.; Hassanzadeh, H. Effectiveness of Natural Gas Condensate as a Viable Solvent in ES-SAGD Processes: An Experimental Investigation Using a 3-D Physical Model. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 16036–16048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, S.; Huang, S.; Jiang, Q.; Jiang, G.; Zhou, X.; Yu, C. An innovative in situ solvent generation enhanced SAGD technique: Mechanism analysis based on numerical simulation. Fuel 2024, 364, 131020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Atta, D.; BinDahbag, M.; Bagherzadeh, H.; Nath, D.; Shah Bukhari, S.S.U.; Turkman, S.; El-Shazly, A.; Hassanzadeh, H. A 3-D Physical Model Experimental Study of the ES-SAGD Process Utilizing Dimethyl Ether (DME) as a Solvent. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 15672–15688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Halari, D.; Yadav, S.; Kesarwani, H.; Saxena, A.; Sharma, S. Nanoparticle and surfactant stabilized carbonated water induced in-situ CO2 foam: An improved oil recovery approach. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 3622–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Geng, W.; Dong, B.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.z.; Yang, N.; Si, Y.; Dai, C.; Zhao, G.; Cheng, H. A Temperature-Salinity Responsive MCPs System for Water Shutoff in Tight Gas Reservoirs. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 16830–16843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, T.; Bai, B.; Huang, R.; Zhang, S.; Liu, P.; Eriyagama, Y.; Tian, X.; Ahdaya, M.; Schuman, T. Development and evaluation of lysine-crosslinked re-crosslinkable particle gel for water control in high-temperature reservoirs. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 407, 125133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ben Ali, A.; Elaf, R.; Almakimi, A.A.; Saad, M.; Hussein, I.A.; Bai, B. Development of agar-based preformed particle gel for water control in high-salinity reservoirs. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2024, 63, 8524–8541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, C.; Zhang, H.-L.; Fu, J.-H.; Su, Y.; Li, Q.-F.; Yue, T.-Q. A novel drilling parameter optimization method based on big data of drilling. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, 1596–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kang, M.-L.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, L.-Z.; Liao, G.-Z.; Shao, R.-B.; Luo, G. An integrated method of data-driven and mechanism models for formation evaluation with logs. Pet. Sci. 2025, 22, 1110–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mkono, C.N.; Chuanbo, S.; Mulashani, A.K.; Abelly, E.N.; Kasala, E.E.; Shanghvi, E.R.; Emmanuely, B.L.; Mokobodi, T. Improved Reservoir Porosity Estimation Using an Enhanced Group Method of Data Handling with Differential Evolution Model and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. SPE J. 2025, 30, 1922–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meng, H.; Lin, B.; Jin, Y. Stop Using Black-Box Models: Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Rate of Penetration Prediction. SPE J. 2024, 29, 6640–6654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhu, D.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, P.; Lu, J.; Yang, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhang, T. Laboratory Evaluation of Antileakage Performance against CO2 of Alkali-Activated Gel-Reinforced Cement for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage. SPE J. 2025, 30, 3776–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Su, D.; Mao, T.; Huang, S.; Li, Z.; Zhou, C. Novel Prediction Method for the Service Life of the Cement Sheath in Gas Storage Wells. SPE J. 2025, 30, 3437–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Pang, H.; Lin, B. Upscaling for Full-Physics Models of CO2 Injection Into Saline Aquifers. SPE J. 2025, 30, 3065–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, C.; Zhang, M.; Chen, W.; Zhang, S.; Wang, S. A Microscopic Experimental Study on the Dominant Flow Channels of Water Flooding in Ultra-High Water Cut Reservoirs. Energies 2024, 17, 5756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tian, J.; Huang, S.; Dong, M.; Yan, W.; Qi, Z. A Study on the Thermal Physical Property Changes in Formation Rocks during Rapid Preheating of SAGD. Energies 2024, 17, 3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, Q.; Tian, J.; Liu, Y.; Qi, Z.; Jiao, H.; Yang, S. Comparison of the Reaction Characteristics of Different Fuels in the Supercritical Multicomponent Thermal Fluid Generation Process. Energies 2024, 17, 5376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, S.; Qi, Z.; Tian, J.; Dong, M.; Zhang, W.; Yan, W. Composition and Injection Rate Co-Optimization Method of Supercritical Multicomponent Thermal Fluid Used for Offshore Heavy Oil Thermal Recovery. Energies 2024, 17, 5239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, W.; Qi, Z.; Tian, J.; Xu, F.; Kong, D.; Dong, M.; Yang, S.; Yan, W. Influence of Reaction Conditions on the Yield of Supercritical Multicomponent Thermal Fluids. Energies 2024, 17, 5012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, H.; Pu, J.; Zhang, L.; Deng, H.; Yu, J.; Xie, Y.; Tong, X.; Man, X.; Liu, Z. Gas Production Prediction Model of Volcanic Reservoir Based on Data-Driven Method. Energies 2024, 17, 5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, A.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Fan, X.; Ren, X.; Li, Q.; Yue, L. Development of a Hybrid AI Model for Fault Prediction in Rod Pumping System for Petroleum Well Production. Energies 2024, 17, 5422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.; Guo, L.; Jia, Q.; Xie, X.; Zhu, W.; Wang, P. Research on the Liquid Helium Insulation Characteristics of an Experimental System. Energies 2025, 18, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, D. New Advances in Oil, Gas and Geothermal Reservoirs: 2nd Edition. Energies 2025, 18, 4789. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184789

AMA Style

Zhu D. New Advances in Oil, Gas and Geothermal Reservoirs: 2nd Edition. Energies. 2025; 18(18):4789. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Daoyi. 2025. "New Advances in Oil, Gas and Geothermal Reservoirs: 2nd Edition" Energies 18, no. 18: 4789. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184789

APA Style

Zhu, D. (2025). New Advances in Oil, Gas and Geothermal Reservoirs: 2nd Edition. Energies, 18(18), 4789. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop