Next Article in Journal
Integration Strategies for Large-Scale Renewable Interconnections with Grid Forming and Grid Following Inverters, Capacitor Banks, and Harmonic Filters
Previous Article in Journal
Redefining Energy Management for Carbon-Neutral Supply Chains in Energy-Intensive Industries: An EU Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources: Latest Advances and Prospects

School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
Energies 2025, 18(15), 3933; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18153933
Submission received: 26 June 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 23 July 2025

1. Introduction

As the global energy structure continues to evolve toward low-carbon, cleaner, and more diversified systems, unconventional oil and gas resources—such as shale oil and gas, tight gas, and coalbed methane—are playing an increasingly vital role in ensuring energy security and promoting economic development [1,2,3,4,5]. Compared with conventional oil and gas, these unconventional resources are more widely distributed and possess substantial reserves. However, their special seepage mechanisms and distinct development models pose considerable technical and economic challenges [6,7,8,9,10]. In this context, achieving the efficient, low-carbon, and intelligent exploration and development of unconventional oil and gas has become a key focus of current research.
The success of the shale revolution in the United States has provided valuable technical pathways for the global development of unconventional oil and gas resources [11,12,13]. Countries such as China and Canada have also made significant progress, demonstrating considerable resource potential [14,15,16,17]. However, due to the typical geological characteristics of unconventional reservoirs—such as low porosity, low permeability, and strong heterogeneity—their commercial development continues to face substantial challenges [18,19,20,21]. In particular, limited permeability and complex reservoir structures restrict the efficient migration and accumulation of oil and gas [22,23,24].
Therefore, technological innovation is urgently required to advance the development of unconventional oil and gas resources [25,26]. On the one hand, the development of high-resolution geophysical exploration techniques and microscopic pore structure characterization methods is essential for enhancing resource identification and reservoir evaluation [27,28,29,30]. On the other hand, fracturing and recovery technologies must be further optimized to enable low-energy, high-efficiency production [31,32,33]. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence into reservoir modeling is significantly enhancing the level of development processes [34,35,36,37].

2. Review of the Research Presented in This Special Issue

The papers featured in this Special Issue highlight recent advancements in the exploration and development of unconventional oil and gas resources. These innovations primarily focus on three key areas: reservoir characterization and evaluation technologies, the mechanisms of hydrocarbon enrichment and geological controls, development technologies, and enhanced recovery.

2.1. Advances in Reservoir Characterization and Evaluation Technology

In recent years, with the continuous advancement of unconventional oil and gas exploration and development, substantial progress has been achieved in reservoir characterization and evaluation technologies [38,39,40]. In practical exploration, core samples are often difficult to obtain, and only cuttings may be available, highlighting the need to improve alternative methods for reservoir characterization. Wang et al. [41] demonstrated the feasibility of using cuttings as substitutes for whole cores in carbonate rocks by employing low-field nuclear magnetic resonance techniques, and further investigated the relationship between sample sizes and key reservoir property parameters. The results indicate that cuttings larger than 1 mm can be effectively used for porosity determination, while cuttings smaller than 6.7 mm are unsuitable for analyzing pore size distribution and permeability.
On the other hand, fracture development characteristics are also a critical component of reservoir evaluation. Zhao et al. [42] established a system for identifying favorable fracture development zones in deep coals by integrating tectonic evolution analysis with mechanical simulations. Their study revealed the control mechanism of multi-phase tectonic stress on fracture formation and free gas accumulation, providing theoretical support for fracture prediction in unconventional reservoirs.
It is worth noting that traditional reservoir evaluation methods still face limitations in addressing the structural complexity of reservoirs. To address this problem, Liu et al. [43] proposed a hybrid intelligent model that integrates a convolutional neural network with a visual transformer to efficiently identify diagenetic facies in tight oil reservoirs. This approach significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of identification based on logging image datasets and provides a novel methodology for diagenetic facies recognition in mature oilfields.

2.2. Advances in Hydrocarbon Enrichment and Geological Control Mechanisms

The study of hydrocarbon enrichment and its geological control mechanisms is essential for evaluating the exploration and development potential of unconventional oil and gas resources [44,45,46]. Zhao et al. [47] systematically analyzed the formation characteristics of the Shuguang reservoir using geochemical methods and identified the primary controlling factors influencing reservoir formation. The findings indicate that oil and gas can migrate efficiently along the faults and fractures, and that a high-quality source–reservoir–cap assemblage, coupled with the coordinated configuration of traps and fractures, provides favorable conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation. In addition, Chen et al. [48] investigated the high-rank coals of the Permian Longtan Formation in the Songzao Coalfield, southwestern China, and examined the impacts of the depositional environment, tectonic–thermal evolution, and regional geological structure on coalbed methane accumulation. The results highlight that favorable geological structures, such as closed folds, play a critical role in controlling CBM enrichment and preservation.
For the geological control of hydrocarbon enrichment, Zhang et al. [49] assessed the shale gas exploration potential of the Taiyuan and Shanxi Formations in the North China Basin through analyses of rock mineralogy, organic geochemistry, and elemental geochemistry. The results indicate that the Taiyuan Formation developed under warm, humid, strongly reducing, and highly water-restricted conditions, whereas the Shanxi Formation formed in a reducing to moderately–strongly closed environment under complex and variable climatic conditions. These palaeoenvironmental conditions were conducive to the enrichment and preservation of organic matter, promoting the development of organic-rich shales in the marine–continental transitional facies.

2.3. Advances in the Development of Technology and Enhanced Recovery

Due to the low porosity and low permeability characteristics of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, improving recovery efficiency has become a critical factor for successful development [50,51,52]. Through experimental simulations and other technical approaches, researchers have investigated the mechanisms of multi-media driving and enhancing recovery in shale oil and tight oil reservoirs. Tao et al. [53] examined the sweep efficiency of surfactants, CH4, and CO2 in shale oil reservoirs. The results indicate that CO2 maintains excellent oil displacement performance in micro- to nanopores across multiple rounds of displacement experiments, achieving a final recovery of 38.22%, which significantly outperforms surfactants (29.82%) and CH4 (19.36%), and demonstrates superior repeatability. Regarding the seepage mechanisms in tight oil reservoirs, Li et al. [54] conducted pressure-driven displacement experiments using nuclear magnetic resonance technology and systematically analyzed the distribution and migration behavior of fluids in different pore sizes, providing both theoretical support and practical guidance for improving recovery efficiency in tight oil reservoirs.

3. Conclusions

In recent years, scholars from diverse disciplines—including geology, petroleum engineering, and artificial intelligence—have actively contributed to advancing the exploration and development of unconventional oil and gas resources. This Special Issue presents a collection of innovative research findings that integrate theoretical analysis with practical application, with a primary focus on reservoir characterization, hydrocarbon enrichment mechanisms, and enhanced recovery technologies. These studies offer valuable insights for addressing the key challenges associated with complex unconventional reservoirs. Overall, this Special Issue helps readers to deepen their understanding of the current research progress.

Acknowledgments

The guest editor gratefully acknowledge MDPI for the opportunity to curate this Special Issue of Energies. I sincerely appreciate the invaluable support and guidance provided by the editorial team throughout entire process. I also extend my deepest gratitude to the contributing academic editors—Wei Ju, Shida Chen, Zhengguang Zhang, and Jiang Han—for their expertise and dedication. Finally, I wish to thank the authors for their outstanding contributions and the anonymous reviewers for their rigorous evaluations and insightful feedback, which were instrumental in shaping this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, H.-J.; Ma, F.; Tong, X.-G.; Liu, Z.-D.; Zhang, X.-S.; Wu, Z.-Z.; Li, D.-H.; Wang, B.; Xie, Y.-F.; Yang, L.-Y. Assessment of Global Unconventional Oiland Gas Resources. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2016, 43, 925–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, S.; Qin, Y.; Tang, D.-Z.; Shen, J.; Wang, J.-J.; Chen, S.-D. A comprehensive review of deep coalbed methane and recent developments in China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2023, 279, 104369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, B.; Tao, S.; Sun, B.; Tang, S.-L.; Chen, S.-D.; Wen, Y.-J.; Ye, J.-C. Genesis and accumulation mechanism of external gas in deep coal seams of the Baijiahai Uplift. Junggar Basin, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2024, 286, 104506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, W.-G.; Wang, X.-X.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.-H. Unconventional resources: Provenance analysis, sediment transport, reservoir evaluation, geo-energy. Front. Earth Sci. 2024, 12, 1530200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bhattacharya, S.; Sharma, S.; Agrawal, V.; Dix, M.-C.; Zanoni, G.; Birdwe, J.-E.; Wylie, A.-S.; Wagner, T. Influence of Organic Matter Thermal Maturity on Rare Earth Element Distribution: A Study of Middle Devonian Black Shales from the Appalachian Basin, USA. Energies 2024, 17, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, D.-L.; Wang, J.-J.; Yuan, B.; Shen, Y.-T. Review on Gas Flow and Recovery in Unconventional Porous Rocks. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2017, 1, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Walker, L. Technology Focus: Unconventional and Tight Reservoirs. J. Pet. Technol. 2024, 76, 88–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdulhadi, D.; Ali, J.-A.; Hama, S.-M. Advanced Techniques for Improving the Production of Natural Resources from Unconventional Reservoirs: A State-of-the-Art Review. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 10853–10876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zou, W.; Gu, Y.-G. Solvent Exsolution and Liberation from Different Heavy Oil–Solvent Systems in Bulk Phases and Porous Media: A Comparison Study. Energies 2024, 17, 2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, H.-W.; Zhang, Z.-S.; Guo, J.-H.; Fang, S.-N.; Wang, C. Numerical Simulation Study on the Influence of Cracks in a Full-Size Core on the Resistivity Measurement Response. Energies 2024, 17, 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zou, C.-N.; Zhao, Q.; Dong, D.-Z.; Yang, Z.; Qiu, Z.; Liang, F.; Wang, N.; Huang, Y.; Duan, A.-X.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Geological characteristics, main challenges and future prospect of shale gas. J. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2017, 2, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mohanty, K.-K.; Tong, S.-Y.; Miller, C.; Zeng, T.-Z.; Honarpour, M.-M.; Turek, E.; Peck, D.-D. Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery using Mixtures of Energizing Chemicals in Unconventional Reservoirs. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2017, 22, 1436–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, P.-W.; Liu, Z.-B.; Zhang, D.-W.; Xiong, L.; Liu, H.-T.; Zhou, L.; Li, P. Source rock and reservoir qualities of middle Jurassic Lianggaoshan lacustrine shale at fuxing area, Sichuan Basin: Implication for shale-oil enrichment. Unconv. Resour. 2023, 3, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zou, C.-N.; Yang, Z.; Cui, J.-W.; Zhu, R.-K.; Hou, L.-H.; Tao, S.-Z.; Yuan, X.-J.; Wu, S.-T.; Lin, S.-H.; Wang, L.; et al. Formation mechanism, geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2013, 40, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, J.-Z.; Dong, D.-Z.; Chen, G.-S.; Wang, S.-Q.; Cheng, K.-M. Prospects and strategic position of shale gas resources in China. Nat. Gas Ind. 2009, 29, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kędzior, S.; Teper, L. Occurrence and Potential for Coalbed Methane Extraction in the Depocenter Area of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Poland) in the Context of Selected Geological Factors. Energies 2024, 17, 2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Q.; Li, P.; Wei, X.-L.; Chen, C.-S.; Dang, W.; Nie, H.-K.; Zhang, J.-C. Mineralogy and geochemistry of shale from Shanxi Formation, Southern North China Basin: Implication for organic matter accumulation. Unconv. Resour. 2025, 6, 100151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tao, S.; Wang, Y.-B.; Tang, D.-Z.; Xu, H.; Lv, Y.-M.; He, W.; Li, Y. Dynamic variation effects of coal permeability during the coalbed methane development process in the Qinshui Basin, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 93, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gensterblum, Y.; Ghanizadeh, A.; Cuss, R.-J.; Amann-Hildenbrand, A.; Krooss, B.-M.; Clarkson, C.-R.; Harrington, J.-F.; Zoback, M.-D. Gas transport and storage capacity in shale gas reservoirs e a review. Part A: Transport processes. J. Unconv. Oil Gas Resour. 2015, 12, 87–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pan, Z.-J.; Connell, L.-D. Reservoir simulation of free and adsorbed gas production from shale. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 22, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, Z.-Y.; Tao, S.; Gao, L.-C.; Cui, Y.; Jing, Q.-H.; Chen, S.-D.; He, W.; Guo, J.; Hai, L.-F. Detailed Characterization of Microscopic Pore Structure in Low-Rank Coal: A Case Study of Zhalainuoer Coalfield. Nat. Resour. Res. 2024, 33, 2261–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alharthy, N.; Teklu, T.; Kazemi, H.; Graves, R.; Hawthorne, S.; Braunberger, J.; Kurtoglu, B. Enhanced Oil Recovery in Liquid-Rich Shale Reservoirs: Laboratory to Field. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2017, 21, 137–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tao, S.; Pan, Z.-J.; Chen, S.-D.; Tang, S.-L. Coal seam porosity and fracture heterogeneity of marcolithotypes in the Fanzhuang Block, southern Qinshui Basin, China. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2019, 66, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tao, S.; Gao, L.-J.; Pan, Z.-J. Swelling of clay minerals and its effect on coal permeability and gas production: A case study of southern Qinshui Basin, China. Energy Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 515–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sie, C.-Y.; Nguyen, Q.-P. Field gas Huff-n-Puff for improving oil recovery in the Eagle Ford Shale−The effect of injection gas composition and cycle. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 5154–5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, L.-R.; Wang, D.-J.; Liu, L.-Z.; Wang, C.-C.; Zhu, H.-Y.; Tang, X.-H. Review of shale oil and gas refracturing: Techniques and field applications. Processes 2024, 12, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, S.-B.; Liu, J.-F.; Yang, D.-S.; Ni, H.-Y.; Huang, B.-X.; Zhang, K.; Mao, X.-B. Pore structure characterization and permeability prediction of coal samples based on SEM images. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2019, 67, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, D.-M.; Zhao, Z.; Cai, Y.-D.; Sun, F.-R. Characterizing coal gas reservoirs: A multiparametric evaluation based on geological and geophysical methods. Gondwana Res. 2024, 133, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tang, H.-J.; Kou, G.; Zhou, H.; Liu, W.-W.; Duan, X.-G.; Zhan, S.-Y.; Li, H.-Y.; Li, Q.-Z. Microscopic pore-throat classification and reservoir grading evaluation of the Fengcheng formation in shale oil reservoir. Unconv. Resour. 2024, 4, 100074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, Z.; Liu, D.-M.; Cai, Y.-D.; Qiu, F.; Sun, F.-R. Gas-Bearing Characteristics of Coal Measure Strata and Logging Evaluation of Fluid Pressure Systems. Phys. Fluids 2025, 37, 046618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alvarez, J.-O.; Tovar, F.-D.; Schechter, D.-S. Improving oil recovery in the wolfcamp reservoir by soaking/flowback production schedule with surfactant additives. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2018, 21, 1083–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, S.-Q.; Wu, Y.; Yan, Y.-Q.; Huo, T.-W.; Xu, Z.-Y.; Li, Y.-Y.; He, J.-X.; Zhang, W.; Wang, D. Parameter optimization study of three-dimensional well network-fracture network coupled fracturing in jimsar shale oil. Unconv. Resour. 2024, 4, 100102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kang, Y.-L.; Li, P.-S.; Cao, W.-K.; Chen, M.-J.; You, L.-J.; Liu, J.; Lai, Z.-H. Investigation of pore structure alteration and permeability enhancement of shale matrix by supercritical water treatment after hydraulic fracturing. Petroleum 2024, 10, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hossain, M.-S.; El-Shafie, A. Intelligent systems in optimizing reservoir operation policy: A review. Water Resour. Manag. 2013, 27, 3387–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nwachukwu, A.; Jeong, H.-Y.; Pyrcz, M.; Lake, L.-W. Fast evaluation of well placements in heterogeneous reservoir models using machine learning. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 163, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, G.-X.; Yao, Y.-D.; Zhang, T.; Adenutsi, C.-D.; Nassar, N.-N. An integrated approach for history matching of complex fracture distributions for shale oil reservoirs based on improved adaptive particle filter. SPE J. 2022, 28, 594–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Men, X.-Y.; Chen, S.-D.; Wu, H.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Tao, S. Optimizing Neural Networks for Enhanced Fracture Density Prediction in Surrounding Rock of Coalbed Methane Reservoir. Geol. J. 2024, 60, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ertekin, T.; Sun, Q. Artificial intelligence applications in reservoir engineering: A status check. Energies 2019, 12, 2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, M.-Y.; Xie, R.-C.; Yin, S.; Deng, M.-Z.; Chen, J.; Feng, S.-K.; Luo, Z.-W.; Chen, J. Logging identification of complex lithology of the Lower Jurassic Da’anzhai Member in the eastern slope of the western Sichuan Depression. Unconv. Resour. 2023, 3, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Si, S.-H.; He, J.-H.; Zhao, Y.-T.; Chuang, E.; Bai, Y.-B.; Wu, W.-T. Diagenesis of tight sandstone and its influence on reservoir properties: A case study of Fuyu reservoirs in Songliao Basin, China. Unconv. Resour. 2023, 3, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, S.-T.; Chang, Y.-H.; Wang, Z.-F.; Sun, X.-X. Evaluation of Grain Size Effects on Porosity, Permeability, and Pore Size Distribution of Carbonate Rocks Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology. Energies 2024, 17, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, S.-H.; Wang, Y.-B.; Liu, Y.-L.; Liu, Z.-Q.; Wang, W.; Chen, X.-J.; Zhang, J.-Q. Evaluation of Favorable Fracture Area of Deep Coal Reservoirs Using a Combination of Field Joint Observation and Paleostress Numerical Simulation: A Case Study in the Linxing Area. Energies 2024, 17, 3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, T.; Liu, Z.-B.; Zhang, K.-J.; Li, C.-S.; Zhang, Y.; Mu, Z.-H.; Liu, F.; Liu, X.-W.; Mu, M.-N.; Zhang, S.-Q. Intelligent Identification Method for the Diagenetic Facies of Tight Oil Reservoirs Based on Hybrid Intelligence—A Case Study of Fuyu Reservoir in Sanzhao Sag of Songliao Basin. Energies 2024, 17, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, W.-T.; Zhao, J.-Z.; Wang, Y.-B.; Guo, M.-Q.; Wu, H.-Y.; Li, J.; Dang, J.-C. Main controlling factors and enrichment model of a multi-layer tight sandstone gas reservoir: Case study from the Linxing Gas Field, eastern Ordos Basin, Northern China. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 1866–7511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Akbarabadi, M.; Alizaden, A.-H.; Piri, M.; Nagarajan, N. Experimental evaluation of enhanced oil recovery in unconventional reservoirs using cyclic hydrocarbon gas injection. Fuel 2023, 331, 125676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Peng, J.-N.; Liu, X.; Zhuang, X.-B.; Ma, Z.-L.; Pan, W.-L.; Fan, Z.-W.; Luo, K.-P. Geochemical characteristics and sedimentary environment of source rocks in the Qiangtang Basin: New discoveries from the upper Triassic Xiaochaka formation in the Woruoshan Mountain. Unconv. Resour. 2023, 3, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, G.-J.; Jiang, F.-J.; Zhang, Q.; Pang, H.; Zhang, S.-P.; Liu, X.-Z.; Chen, D. Hydrocarbon Accumulation Process and Mode in Proterozoic Reservoir of Western Depression in Liaohe Basin, Northeast China: A Case Study of the Shuguang Oil Reservoir. Energies 2024, 17, 2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, D.-S.; Wang, J.-X.; Tian, X.-S.; Guo, D.-X.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Zeng, C.-L. Geological Constraints on the Gas-Bearing Properties in High-Rank Coal: A Case Study of the Upper Permian Longtan Formation from the Songzao Coalfield, Chongqing, Southwest China. Energies 2024, 17, 1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, H.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.-M.; Yang, J.-H.; Zhang, Y.-S.; Dou, K.-L.; Wang, Z.-X. Study on Sedimentary Environment and Organic Matter Enrichment Model of Carboniferous–Permian Marine–Continental Transitional Shale in Northern Margin of North China Basin. Energies 2024, 17, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hajizadeh, Y.; Christie, M.; Demyanov, V. Ant colony optimization for history matching and uncertainty quantification of reservoir models. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2011, 77, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, M.-J.; Zhang, K.; Chen, G.-D.; Zhao, X.-G.; Yao, J.; Yao, C.-J.; Zhang, L.M.; Yang, Y.-F. A classification-based surrogate-assisted multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for production optimization under geological uncertainty. SPE J. 2020, 25, 2450–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gomaa, S.; Salem, K.-G.; El-hoshoudy, A.-N. Enhanced heavy and extra heavy oil recovery: Current status and new trends. Petroleum 2024, 10, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tao, J.-P.; Meng, S.-W.; Li, D.-X.; Liang, L.-H.; Liu, H. Experimental Evaluation of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale Reservoirs Using Different Media. Energies 2024, 17, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, X.-S.; Yang, L.; Sun, D.-Z.; Ling, B.-J.; Wang, S.-L. Experimental Study of Forced Imbibition in Tight Reservoirs Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance under High-Pressure Conditions. Energies 2024, 17, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tao, S. Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources: Latest Advances and Prospects. Energies 2025, 18, 3933. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18153933

AMA Style

Tao S. Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources: Latest Advances and Prospects. Energies. 2025; 18(15):3933. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18153933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tao, Shu. 2025. "Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources: Latest Advances and Prospects" Energies 18, no. 15: 3933. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18153933

APA Style

Tao, S. (2025). Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources: Latest Advances and Prospects. Energies, 18(15), 3933. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18153933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop