Next Article in Journal
Decision Process for Identifying Appropriate Devices for Power Transfer between Voltage Levels in Distribution Grids
Previous Article in Journal
Health State Assessment of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Multi-Health Feature Fusion and Improved Informer Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Water Injection on Combustion and Emissions Parameters of SI Engine Fuelled by Hydrogen–Natural Gas Blends
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Laboratory Tests of Electrical Parameters of the Start-Up Process of Single-Cylinder Diesel Engines

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36 Street, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
2
Faculty of Automotive and Construction Machinery Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Narbutta 84 Street, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(9), 2155; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17092155
Submission received: 30 March 2024 / Revised: 23 April 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 30 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Internal Combustion Engine: Research and Application—2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Despite continuous work on new power systems for vehicles, machines, and devices, the combustion engine is still the dominant system. The operation of the combustion engine is initiated during the starting process using starting devices. The most common starting system used is the electric starter. The starting process of an internal combustion engine depends on the following factors: the technical condition of the starting system, technical condition of the engine, battery charge level, lubricating properties, engine standstill time, engine and ambient temperature, type of fuel, etc. This article presents the results of laboratory tests of the electrical parameters of the starting process of a single-cylinder compression–ignition engine with variable fuel injection parameters and ambient temperature conditions. It was confirmed that for the increased fuel dose FD2, higher values of the measured electrical parameters (Imax, Pmax, and Pmed) were obtained compared to the series of tests with the nominal fuel dose. Knowledge of the values of the electrical parameters of the starting process is important not only for the user (vehicle driver, agricultural machinery operator, etc.), but above all for designers of modern starting systems for combustion engines and service personnel. The obtained results of testing the electrical parameters of the combustion engine during start-up may be helpful in designing new drive systems supported by a compression–ignition combustion engine.

1. Introduction

Despite continuous scientific and research work on new power systems for vehicles, machines and devices, the combustion engine is still the dominant system. The internal combustion engine is practically irreplaceable in the case of large self-propelled agricultural machines such as combines and agricultural tractors that can work without interruption during the field work season. It is true that in the case of agricultural tractors there are attempts to replace tractors powered by combustion engines with electric drives [1,2,3], but these are rather marginal applications inside small farms or orchards [4,5].
The diesel engine is currently the most common source of propulsion for road transport, both in the classic system and in the hybrid system, supporting the electric motor. Research on hybrid systems used to drive motor vehicles is widely described in the available scientific literature, of which the following studies are worth mentioning [6,7,8]. According to the 2023 report presented by the ACEA European Automobile Manufacturers Association [9], the share of passenger cars powered by diesel engines in 2021 was 41.9%. In the case of small delivery vehicles with a load capacity of up to 3.5 tons, it was almost 91%, while the share of medium and heavy trucks was 96.4%, and in the case of buses, it was 92.5% of the vehicle market.
A compression ignition engine has advantages such as reliability, fuel efficiency, larger power range, longer lifetime and maintenance period, better torque characteristics, and higher power density compared to a spark ignition engine [10]. The diesel engine is the most fuel-efficient internal combustion engine; however, the performance of a diesel engine is suboptimal when the engine is cold [11]. Modern piston engines must be characterized by high operating efficiency and the lowest possible production of exhaust gases and noise [12,13]. Also, noise generation from compression ignition engines is a widely discussed problem in the literature [14,15,16], and noise emissions from various means of transport [17,18,19]. Smoke and noise emission reduction from an internal combustion engine with the addition of ferocene were tested by Sejkorova et al. [15], but they did not demonstrate a positive effect of using this fuel conditioner. Verner and Sejkorova [20] conducted research comparing the results of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission measurements of passenger cars powered by diesel and gasoline engines obtained with PEMS and CVS measurement systems in laboratory conditions on a dynamometer, in accordance with the WLTC driving cycle methodology. The results show that there are no statistically significant differences between CVS and PEMS devices, which are typically used to measure real driving emissions (RDE) [20]. The issues of examining the composition of exhaust emissions from a compression–ignition engine are widely discussed in the world literature [21,22,23] and also include studies of exhaust emissions generated during engine start-up [24,25,26]. Currently, most research focuses on, among other things, exhaust emissions generated during the combustion of alternative fuels to diesel oil. As we know, the first designs of diesel engines were fueled by vegetable oil [27]. In this area, it is worth mentioning the following scientific and research works: Ding et al. [28] investigated the use of natural gas in a diesel engine, Longwic and Sander [29] extensively studied mixtures of rapeseed oil containing n-hexane, and Labaj and Barta [30] investigated the possibility of using butanol in a diesel engine. Numerous scientific works focus on the study of biodiesel and its impact on exhaust emissions, including [31,32,33,34,35]. In research carried out by Imran and Saleh [36], it was shown that biodiesel from Cresson oil and mixtures with Iraqi diesel oil reduce engine thermal efficiency and heat release, as well as delay time and cylinder pressure, while exhaust gas temperature and fuel consumption during braking increase. In the case of emissions, an increase in the share of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and CO2 was recorded, while the emission of carbon monoxide (CO), soot, and unburned hydrocarbons (HC) looked favorable with their decreased values. Ramalingam et al. [37] investigated the possibilities of obtaining bioenergy from waste foam fat (LFO) and citronella grass (NFCO). Compared to diesel, the NFCO blend reduced HC, CO, and particulate matter (PM) emissions by 6.48%, 12.33%, and 16.66%, respectively, while CO2 and NOx emissions increased [37]. As stated by Szyszlak-Bargłowicz et al. [38], the combustion of FAME rapeseed oil methyl esters resulted in a reduction in PM content in exhaust gases by an average of 40–60% for engine speeds in the full-load range compared to that from the combustion of diesel oil. We can say that biodiesel for use in diesel engines has become a substitute for diesel oil [39]. Furthermore, Dittrich et al. [40] studied the fuel control system when an engine uses LPG–diesel dual fuel with different LPG proportions. They concluded that CO2 and PM concentrations are reduced in dual-fuel vehicles. Interesting research on alternative fuels in dual-fuel diesel engines was also conducted by Cung et al. [41] and Lebedevas et al. [42]. Basically, exhaust emission tests come down to determining the values of four standard exhaust gas components, but there are researchers, e.g., Mikulski et al. [43], who use FTIR analysis of exhaust gases where they identify 23 exhaust gas compounds. In order to make heating systems more efficient and to better understand electricity generation, a number of studies have been carried out, of which the following are worth mentioning [44,45,46]. An important area of research when it comes to reducing emissions is also the adsorption and regeneration of the system, which includes the coupling of physical and chemical effects [47]. Based on the above considerations, it can be concluded that the issue of emissions is a complex issue in the field of combustion engine research and depends on many factors. One of them is the emission of exhaust gases during the starting process, where a larger dose of fuel is needed to initiate the operation of a cold engine, and the exhaust gas treatment systems with which the engine is equipped are not yet operational. In such conditions, at the beginning of engine operation, there are increased exhaust emissions into the atmosphere. Therefore, the issue of starting a combustion engine is still a current issue and is constantly being addressed by scientists around the world. And new challenges leading to “zero emission” are becoming a current challenge for combustion engines.
As is known, the combustion engine must ensure reliable operation for a very long time [48,49,50,51] under variable load conditions. Interesting operational tests of the diesel engine power system were carried out, among others: Aulin et al. [52], Kamiński et al. [53], Osipowicz et al. [54], and Punov et al. [55]. Pawlak and Skrzek [56] also modified the injection strategy in the Common Rail system using vegetable oils. Stoeck [57] presented a new methodology for testing Common Rail injectors in problematic cases, which extends the standard diagnostic procedure by analyzing the resultant fields of the dosed fuel. Moreover, much attention was paid to the issue of diagnosing faults in the fuel supply system in the following scientific studies by Figlus et al. [58,59] and Szpica et al. [60] and to the wear of the cylinder liner during the start-up of a compression–ignition engine [61,62]. The operational wear and durability of the piston–rings–cylinder system was investigated by Czech and Madej [63] and Kowalski et al. [64], the wear of the crankshaft of a marine engine was the subject of research by Siemiątkowski et al. [65], while measurements of engine cylinder wear were presented by Jermak et al. [66]. Another study on measuring diameter uncertainty and roundness deviation for small cylinders was presented by Zhao et al. [67].
The process of starting a diesel engine, despite many years of research, is a phenomenon that still attracts the attention of many researchers, which is reflected in numerous scientific works [59,68,69]. Many works are related to starting the engine in conditions of low ambient temperatures, for example, those of Chu-Van et al. [70], Deng et al. [71], Pastor et al. [72], and Roberts et al. [73]. Similarly, a lot of research work has been carried out under hot start conditions, for example, Jaworski et al. [74], Lodi et al. [75], Mitchell et al. [76], and Zare et al. [77]. When starting a diesel engine, many negative phenomena and processes are observed that affect not only the engine, but also its surroundings [78,79]. For example, Droździel, in [80], presents the results of tests of the operational electrical parameters of the start-up of the combustion engine, carried out during vehicle operation. The starting process is influenced by many factors, such as the quality of the engine oil, battery charge, technical condition of the engine and starting system, and engine temperature. The starting process also depends on various settings and strategies as well as the condition of the engine’s injection system [78,81,82]. The necessary mechanical energy needed to initiate independent operation of the combustion engine is transferred by driving the crankshaft using an electric starter [80]. Therefore, the technical condition of the starter has a significant impact on the successful starting of the combustion engine. The issue of car electric starters, in detail, are presented in the works by Dziubiński et al. [83,84] and Plizga [85].
Despite many attempts, replacing the combustion engine with another yet equally efficient drive source is still a long way off. Despite huge progress in the field of individual electromobility [86,87,88,89,90] and in the field of public transport [91,92], they still encounter many barriers [93,94], and space for piston engines is still huge. The opening of new research directions in the field of alternative fuels used for transport modes, such as hydrogen [95,96,97,98] or ammonia [99,100,101], for powering internal combustion piston engines in various means of transport pose new challenges for internal combustion engines. Also, in non-road applications, there is an important share of single-cylinder combustion engines [102].
This article presents selected results of laboratory tests on the electrical parameters of the start-up of a single-cylinder diesel engine at constant injector opening pressure and fuel injection advance angle for two fuel doses at ambient temperature. Experimental tests were carried out on a dedicated laboratory test stand at the Lublin University of Technology.

2. Materials and Methods

The main elements of the test stand are a single-cylinder, four-stroke engine with direct fuel injection Ruggerini Diesel RY125 manufactured by Lombardini, Italy, a control and data recording system, as well as a starting and exhaust gas discharge system. Table 1 contains selected technical data of the research engine and its starter. The starting system installation voltage is nominally 12 V, the battery’s electrical capacity is 60 Ah, and the maximum starting current is 570 A. The starting battery was well charged during the research tests.
The test stand (Figure 1) is equipped with equipment for measuring the characteristic parameters of the diesel engine start-up process. On the test stand, information about the position of the engine crankshaft was obtained from the Kübler incremental encoder 8.5820.1312.3600 (Kübler Group, Fritz Kübler GmbH, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany). TP-371, TP-372 sensors with a single processing element (Pt100 platinum resistor) were used to measure cylinder temperature, oil temperature and ambient temperature. The current drawn by the starter was measured by a LEM sensor, HTA-1000, attached to the starter power cord. The sensor measures currents in the range of 0 ÷ 1000 A with an accuracy of ±1% and linearity of ±0.5%. It is equipped with a voltage output of 0 ÷ 4 V and a frequency response of 40 kHz. The voltage at the battery terminals was measured using a specially made measuring system based on two 100 Ω resistors connected in series [78]. All measurement signals were recorded using the National Instruments measurement card DAQPad-6070E (16 imputs, 1.25 MS/s, 12 bit, multifunction ± 5 V).
The tests of the electrical parameters of the start-up process of the diesel engine were carried out on the so-called cold engine. Cold starts of the engine took place at the first daily start-up and after a set time from the engine standstill, at 4-h intervals, with the determined fuel injection parameters and at the ambient temperature. A total of 30 attempts were made to start the engine in a given test series. The starting tests were carried out with the following determined engine parameters:
  • Static fuel injection advance angle—17.6 °CA;
  • Injector opening pressure—26 MPa;
  • Fuel dose—factory default for idling—FD1, and increased—FD2;
  • Idle speed—810 rpm for fuel dose FD1 and 1000 rpm for fuel dose FD2;
  • Start-up temperature—in the range of 22.75–23.95 °C.
There are multiple definitions of an engine cold start or engine warm up found in the literature [70,75,104]. In the literature on the subject, there are many possibilities in evaluating the parameter of start-up time. In these tests, the start-up time was determined based on the moment a stable rotational speed of the engine crankshaft was obtained. On the other hand, the starter operation time was determined on the basis of energy consumption time at the battery terminals. The parameter ts is the starter operating time [ms], understood as the time that elapses from the moment the starter is turned on until it reaches unloaded operation. Imax is the maximum value of the current consumed by the starter at the beginning of the start-up [A], which is an indirect measure of the resistance to movement at the start of the engine. The Umax parameter describes the maximum voltage value measured at the battery terminals just before the engine start-up process [V]. Umin describes the minimum voltage at the beginning of the start-up [V], Uk describes the voltage at the end of data recording after the start-up [V], and n is the engine speed [rpm]. In Figure 2 is a chart showing the values and parameters of the start-up process recorded during the test sample.
Determination of the injector opening pressure was carried out in accordance with the recommendations included in the BN-84/1301-08 standard [105], on the PRW-3 injector test stand. The value of the fuel injection advance angle was determined by means of a stroboscopic lamp ETD019.02 FD268, BOSCH, Germany.

3. Results and Discussion

This part presents the obtained test results for the following start-up parameters: the maximum current consumed by the starter at the beginning of the start-up—Imax, the minimum voltage at the beginning of the start-up—Umin, maximum instantaneous starting power—Pmax, average starting power—Pmed, and starter operating time—ts. Start-up tests were carried out at ambient temperature, which is widely used in the literature [26,79,106]. The value of the injector opening pressure in both measurement series was 26 MPa. The tests were carried out with two fuel doses: a nominal fuel dose marked as FD1 and an increased fuel dose marked as FD2.
Figure 3 presents the distribution of the values of the maximum current consumed by the starter at the beginning of the start-up for the two measurement series.
As can be seen in Figure 3, the current value is usually lower for starting attempts in the first measurement series, i.e., at the nominal fuel dose, FD1. In the case of most recorded starting attempts, the difference between the series is small, approximately 7 A, and this is the average value of this parameter. Both series of experiments were performed at a similar ambient temperature of approximately 23 °C. As one can see, increasing the fuel dose requires more effort, and therefore, the maximum value of the current consumed during starting is higher in this case. It can therefore be said that with these starting parameters and a given ambient (engine) temperature, increasing the fuel dose results in a greater demand for electricity.
Figure 4 shows the distribution of minimum voltage values at the battery terminals at the beginning of the start-up for the two measurement series.
Analyzing the graph in Figure 4, it can be seen that in the case of the second test series, i.e., the test with an increased dose of FD2 fuel, lower values of voltage drops on the starter battery were obtained. This indicates that a larger amount of fuel in the combustion chamber places a greater load on the starter battery. It should also be noted that in most cases, very similar voltage values were obtained, and the voltage course is basically undisturbed. And looking at the trend lines, they run similarly in both measurement series, which is also confirmed by the correlation coefficient R2.
Figure 5 presents the distribution of the maximum value of the instantaneous starting power, Pmax.
Analyzing the course of the parameters in the graph in Figure 5, it can be seen that in the case of an increased dose of FD2 fuel (second series), higher values of the maximum starting power occurred, which confirms the obtained values of the previously analyzed electrical start-up parameters.
Figure 6 presents the distribution of average starting power values Pmed for two measurement series.
Analyzing the course of the graph in Figure 6, it is difficult to notice the dominant tendency, but based on empirical data, it can be said that the average starting power Pmed is higher for a series of starts with the larger fuel dose FD2. This means that in the case of an increased fuel dose in these ambient conditions (average starting temperature of 23 °C), the growth of fuel in the combustion chamber causes a greater demand for electrical power, i.e., the starter must perform more work than in the case of starting the engine with the nominal fuel dose. It should be remembered that temperature has a significant impact on the start-up process of combustion engines, which is confirmed by numerous publications [71,79,106,107].
Figure 7 shows the values of the starter operating times in each series of tests, expressed in milliseconds ([ms]).
If we look at the trend line in the case of the starter operation time (Figure 7), we can see that the second series with an increased fuel dose, FD2, needed more time to start the engine than in the series with a nominal fuel dose, FD1; i.e., as already stated above, the starter performed a greater work. However, in the case of these two test series of starting tests of the diesel engine, the starter operating times, and therefore the engine start-up time, do not show any major differences. It can therefore be said that with the assumed starting parameters, fuel supply system, and given ambient temperatures, the starter operating time shows similar empirical values. For comparison, the values of the starter operating time when trying to start the engine can be quoted. Thus, for series 1 (with FD1), the shortest starter operating time was 621.6 ms, while the longest time was 932.4 ms. In the case of test series 2, the shortest starter operating time was 562.4 ms, while the longest starter operating time in this series was 962 ms. Therefore, it can be said that the start-up time is random and independent of the settings of the engine control parameters, which is also visible in the interpenetration of the trend lines of both measurement series. The presented values also indicate slight differences in start-up times between the compared test series. Moreover, it can be concluded that a higher fuel dose means a larger amount of fuel–air mixture inside the cylinder, i.e., in the combustion chamber. Compressing a larger volume of refrigerant causes greater resistance to piston movement and the starting system must overcome the additional load, providing greater engine torque, which is also visible in a higher value of starting current (Imax).
The presented research results may be helpful in designing starting systems for compression–ignition combustion engines and may be a contribution to simulation studies in this area. Scientists are still very interested in the process of starting an internal combustion engine [108,109] and new applications. For example, Coronado et al. [110] investigated the availability of cogeneration systems in extreme areas (Antarctica) for a waste heat recovery system with a diesel generator using a continuous Markov approach and a Markov state space model.

4. Conclusions

This paper presents the new results of experimental tests of the electrical parameters of the start-up process of a single-cylinder diesel engine with variable fuel injection parameters under positive ambient temperature conditions (approximately 23 °C). Experimental tests were carried out for an engine powered by diesel oil with a 5% share of so-called eco-additives, but the next steps will be testing the emissions of the internal combustion engine during start-up and testing alternative fuel use.
This research on the starting process of a combustion engine was carried out at a constant injector opening pressure of 26 MPa with the variable fuel doses FD1 and FD2. It was shown that in the case of an increased fuel dose, FD2 (second test series), higher values of measured electrical parameters (Imax, Pmax, and Pmed) were obtained compared to the test series with the nominal fuel dose marked as FD1. However, in the case of starter operation time, slightly shorter starting times were achieved for series 1 compared to series 2 with an increased fuel dose. It can therefore be summarized that with the given fuel injection parameters and given positive ambient temperatures (approximately 23 °C), starting attempts carried out with an increased fuel dose are unfavorable because they resulted in higher current consumption, i.e., they placed a greater load on the starter battery as well as the starter, which worked with greater power.
In this study, the influence of ambient temperature did not have a major impact on start-up success because the ambient temperature range was very similar, approximately 23 °C, which did not significantly affect the experiments performed. The presented results of research on the electrical parameters of the combustion engine in the start-up process may be helpful in configuring other drive systems supported by the internal combustion engine. These systems do not have to be limited only to powering motor vehicles or stationary systems for generating electricity; they may be important for service technicians or for designing new agricultural machines or off-road mobile machinery using internal combustion engines.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.; methodology, J.C. and P.I.; software, J.C.; validation, J.C. and J.S.; formal analysis, J.C. and P.I.; investigation, J.C.; resources, J.C.; data curation, J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C., J.S. and P.I.; writing—review and editing, J.C., J.S. and P.I.; visualization, J.S.; supervision, J.C.; project administration, J.C.; funding acquisition, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the competition “Szybka Ścieżka 1_2020” that led to the application for co-financing of the project no.: POIR.01.01.01-00-0394/20 “Development of an innovative power supply module for an electric driven bus using hydrogen and methanol as fuel to charge the vehicle’s battery while in the motion”.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Malik, A.; Kohli, S. Electric tractors: Survey of challenges and opportunities in India. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 28, 2318–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stakens, J.; Mutule, A.; Lazdins, R. Agriculture Electrification, Emerging Technologies, Trends and Barriers: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Latv. J. Phys. Tech. Sci. 2023, 60, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vasile, I.; Tudor, E.; Sburlan, I.-C.; Matache, M.-G.; Cristea, M. Optimization of the Electronic Control Unit of Electric-Powered Agricultural Vehicles. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023, 14, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bessette, D.L.; Brainard, D.C.; Srivastava, A.K.; Lee, W.; Geurkink, S. Battery Electric Tractors: Small-Scale Organic Growers’ Preferences, Perceptions, and Concerns. Energies 2022, 15, 8648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gorjian, S.; Ebadi, H.; Trommsdorff, M.; Sharon, H.; Demant, M.; Schindele, S. The advent of modern solar-powered electric agricultural machinery: A solution for sustainable farm operations. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 292, 126030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barta, D.; Mruzek, M.; Kendra, M.; Kordos, P.; Krzywonos, L. Using of non-conventional fuels in hybrid vehicle drives. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2016, 10, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dižo, J.; Blatnický, M.; Semenov, S.; Mikhailov, E.; Kostrzewski, M.; Droździel, P.; Šťastniak, P. Electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles and their infrastructure in a particular European region. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, 55, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Figlus, T.; Czachor, T. Preliminary studies of the effect of travelling speed and propulsion type on the sound level in the passenger compartment of a vehicle with a hybrid propulsion system. In Proceedings of the 11th International Science and Technical Conference Automotive Safety, Častá Papiernicka, Slovakia, 18–20 April 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vehicles in Use Europe 2023, 17 January 2023, ACEA Report. Available online: https://www.acea.auto/files/ACEA-report-vehicles-in-use-europe-2023.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2023).
  10. Ipci, D.; Karabulut, H. Thermodynamic and dynamic modeling of a single cylinder four stroke diesel engine. Appl. Math. Model. 2016, 40, 3925–3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sakunthalai, R.A.; Xu, H.; Liu, D.; Tian, J.; Wyszynski, M.; Piaszyk, J. Impact of Cold Ambient Conditions on Cold Start and Idle Emissions from Diesel Engines. In Proceedings of the SAE 2014 International Powertrain, Fuels & Lubricants Meeting, Birmingham, UK, 20–23 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. Baran, P.; Kukuca, P.; Barta, D.; Labuda, R.; Drozdiel, P.; Pukalskas, S. The Issue of Balancing Internal Combustion Engines with Non-Conventional Crank Mechanism. Commun. Sci. Lett. Univ. Zilina 2017, 19, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tarbajovský, P.; Puškár, M. The resonance expansion system for emissions reduction of internal combustion engines. Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 2023, 119, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Figlus, T.; Liščák, Š. Assessment of the vibroactivity level of SI engines in stationary and non-stationary operating conditions. J. Vibroeng. 2014, 16, 1349–1359. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sejkorová, M.; Šarkan, B.; Verner, J. Efficiency Assessment of Fuel Borne Catalyst. MATEC Web Conf. 2017, 134, 00051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Skrúcaný, T.; Šarkan, B.; Figlus, T.; Synák, F.; Vrábel, J. Measuring of noise emitted by moving vehicles. MATEC Web Conf. 2017, 107, 00072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Figlus, T.; Szafraniec, P.; Skrúcaný, T. Methods of Measuring and Processing Signals during Tests of the Exposure of a Motorcycle Driver to Vibration and Noise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jacyna, M.; Wasiak, M.; Lewczuk, K.; Karoń, G. Noise and environmental pollution from transport: Decisive problems in developing ecologically efficient transport systems. J. Vibroeng. 2017, 19, 5639–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zefreh, M.M.; Torok, A. Theoretical Comparison of the Effects of Different Traffic Conditions on Urban Road Traffic Noise. J. Adv. Transp. 2018, 2018, 7949574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Verner, J.; Sejkorova, M. Comparison of CVS and PEMS measuring devices used for stating CO2 exhaust emissions of light-duty vehicles during WLTP testing procedure. In Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development, ERD 2018, Jelgava, Latvia, 23–25 May 2018; Engineering for Rural Development. Volume 17, pp. 2054–2059. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kubica, G.; Flekiewicz, M.; Marzec, P. Selected aspects of the use of gaseous fuels blends to improve efficiency and emission of SI engine. Transp. Probl. 2019, 14, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Matijošius, J.; Orynycz, O.; Kovbasenko, S.; Simonenko, V.; Shuba, Y.; Moroz, V.; Gutarevych, S.; Wasiak, A.; Tucki, K. Testing the Indicators of Diesel Vehicles Operating on Diesel Oil and Diesel Biofuel. Energies 2022, 15, 9263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Šarkan, B.; Hudec, J.; Sejkorova, M.; Kuranc, A.; Kiktova, M. Calculation of the production of exhaust emissions in the laboratory conditions. J. Physics Conf. Ser. 2021, 1736, 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cui, Y.; Peng, H.; Deng, K.; Shi, L. The effects of unburned hydrocarbon recirculation on ignition and combustion during diesel engine cold starts. Energy 2014, 64, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Giechaskiel, B.; Zardini, A.A.; Clairotte, M. Exhaust Gas Condensation during Engine Cold Start and Application of the Dry-Wet Correction Factor. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kuranc, A.; Słowik, T.; Wasilewski, J.; Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J.; Stoma, M.; Šarkan, B. Emission of particulates and chosen gaseous exhausts components during a diesel engine starting process. In Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific Symposium on Farm Machinery and Process Management in Sustainable Agriculture, Lublin, Poland, 22–24 November 2017; pp. 210–215. [Google Scholar]
  27. Szpica, D.; Czaban, J.; Banaszuk, P.; Weresa, E. The Diesel and the Vegetable oil Properties Assessment in terms of Pumping Capability and Cooperation with Internal Combustion Engine Fuelling System. Acta Mech. Autom. 2015, 9, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ding, S.-L.; Song, E.-Z.; Yang, L.-P.; Litak, G.; Yao, C.; Ma, X.-Z. Investigation on nonlinear dynamic characteristics of combustion instability in the lean-burn premixed natural gas engine. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2016, 93, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Longwic, R.; Sander, P. The course of combustion process under real conditions of work of a traction diesel engine supplied by mixtures of canola oil containing n-hexane. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 421, 042050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Labaj, J.; Barta, D. Unsteady Flow Simulation and Combustion of Ethanol in Diesel Engines. Komunikacie 2006, 8, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dhande, D.Y.; Navale, S.J. Experimental investigations on the performance and emissions of compression ignition engine fueled with lower blends of neem-based biodiesel. Arch. Autom. Engineer. Archiw. Mot. 2024, 103, 57–76. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dzieniszewski, G.; Kuboń, M.; Pristavka, M.; Findura, P. Operating Parameters and Environmental Indicators of Diesel Engines Fed with Crop-Based Fuels. Agric. Eng. 2021, 25, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hawrot-Paw, M.; Koniuszy, A.; Zając, G.; Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J. Ecotoxicity of soil contaminated with diesel fuel and biodiesel. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jayakumar, M.; Gebeyehu, K.B.; Selvakumar, K.V.; Parvathy, S.; Kim, W.; Karmegam, N. Waste Ox bone based heterogeneous catalyst synthesis, characterization, utilization and reaction kinetics of biodiesel generation from Jatropha curcas oil. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kurczyński, D.; Wcisło, G.; Leśniak, A.; Kozak, M.; Łagowski, P. Production and Testing of Butyl and Methyl Esters as New Generation Biodiesels from Fatty Wastes of the Leather Industry. Energies 2022, 15, 8744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Imran, M.S.; Saleh, F.A. The Influence of Using Biodiesel Prepared from Cresson Oil on Emissions and Performance of CI Engines. J. Ecol. Eng. 2024, 25, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ramalingam, K.; Venkatesan, E.P.; Vellaiyan, S.; Mukhtar, A.; Sharifpur, M.; Yasir, A.S.H.M.; Saleel, C.A. Substitution of diesel fuel in conventional compression ignition engine with waste biomass-based fuel and its validation using artificial neural networks. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 177, 1234–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J.; Wasilewski, J.; Zając, G.; Kuranc, A.; Koniuszy, A.; Hawrot-Paw, M. Evaluation of Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions from Combustion of Selected Types of Rapeseed Biofuels. Energies 2023, 16, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Al-Aseebee, M.D.; Ketata, A.; Gomaa, A.E.; Moussa, O.; Driss, Z.; Abid, M.S.; Naje, A.S.; Emaish, H.H. Modeling of Waste Vegetable Oil Biodiesel for Tractor Engine Utilization. J. Ecol. Eng. 2023, 24, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dittrich, A.; Beroun, S.; Zvolsky, T. Diesel gas dual engine with liquid LPG injection into intake manifold. Eng. Rural. Dev. 2018, 1978–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cung, K.D.; Wallace, J.; Kalaskar, V.; Smith, E.M., III; Briggs, T.; Bitsis, D.C., Jr. Experimental study on engine and emissions performance of renewable diesel methanol dual fuel (RMDF) combustion. Fuel 2024, 357, 129664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lebedevas, S.; Pukalskas, S.; Dauksys, V. Mathematical modelling of indicative process parameters of dual-fuel engines with conventional fuel injection system. Transport 2020, 35, 57–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mikulski, M.; Hunicz, J.; Duda, K.; Kazimierski, P.; Suchocki, T.; Rybak, A. Tyre pyrolytic oil fuel blends in a modern compression ignition engine: A comprehensive combustion and emissions analysis. Fuel 2022, 320, 123869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Buratto, W.G.; Muniz, R.N.; Nied, A.; Barros, C.F.d.O.; Cardoso, R.; Gonzalez, G.V. A Review of Automation and Sensors: Parameter Control of Thermal Treatments for Electrical Power Generation. Sensors 2024, 24, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ciupek, B.; Urbaniak, R.; Kinalska, D.; Nadolny, Z. Flue Gas Recirculation System for Biomass Heating Boilers—Research and Technical Applications for Reductions in Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Emissions. Energies 2024, 17, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nandhini, R.; Berslin, D.; Sivaprakash, B.; Rajamohan, N.; Vo, D.-V.N. Thermochemical conversion of municipal solid waste into energy and hydrogen: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 1645–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jia, L.; Cheng, P.; Yu, Y.; Chen, S.-H.; Wang, C.-X.; He, L.; Nie, H.-T.; Wang, J.-C.; Zhang, J.-C.; Fan, B.-G.; et al. Regeneration mechanism of a novel high-performance biochar mercury adsorbent directionally modified by multimetal multilayer loading. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 326, 116790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Droździel, P.; Komsta, H.; Krzywonos, L. An analysis of costs of vehicle repairs in a transportation company. Part II. Transp. Probl. 2012, 7, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  49. Dzitkowski, T.; Dymarek, A.; Margielewicz, J.; Gąska, D.; Orzech, L.; Lesiak, K. Designing of Drive Systems in the Aspect of the Desired Spectrum of Operation. Energies 2021, 14, 2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pulawski, G.; Szpica, D. The modelling of operation of the compression ignition engine powered with diesel fuel with LPG admixture. Mechanika 2015, 21, 500–505. [Google Scholar]
  51. Skrúcaný, T.; Stopková, M.; Stopka, O.; Kalašová, A.; Ovčiarik, P. User’s determination of a proper method for quantifying fuel consumption of a passenger car with compression ignition engine in specific operation conditions. Open Eng. 2021, 11, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aulin, D.; Klymenko, O.; Falendysh, A.; Kletska, O.; Diżo, J. Improvement of diesel injector nozzle test techniques. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 985, 012031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kamiński, M.; Budzyński, P.; Hunicz, J.; Józwik, J. Evaluation of changes in fuel delivery rate by electromagnetic injectors in a common rail system during simulated operation. Eksploat. Niezawodn. Maint. Reliab. 2021, 23, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Osipowicz, T.; Abramek, K.F.; Matuszak, Z.; Jaskiewicz, M.; Ludwinek, K.; Łagowski, P. The concept of annular channels application on the spraying nozzle needle of modern fuel injector in the aspect of combustion process improvement. In Proceedings of the 11th International Science and Technical Conference Automotive Safety, Casta Papiernicka, Slovakia, 18–20 April 2018. Code 136991. [Google Scholar]
  55. Punov, P.; Gechev, T.; Mihalkov, S.; Podevin, P.; Barta, D. Experimental study of multiple pilot injection strategy in an automotive direct injection diesel engine. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 234, 03007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pawlak, G.; Skrzek, T. Combustion of raw Camelina sativa oil in CI engine equipped with common rail system. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 19731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stoeck, T. Analytical methodology for testing Common Rail fuel injectors in problematic cases. Diagnostyka 2021, 22, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Figlus, T.; Konieczny, Ł.; Burdzik, R.; Czech, P. Assessment of diagnostic usefulness of vibration of the common rail system in the diesel engine. Vibroengineering Procedia 2015, 6, 185–189. [Google Scholar]
  59. Figlus, T.; Konieczny, Ł.; Burdzik, R.; Czech, P. The effect of damage to the fuel injector on changes of the vibroactivity of the diesel engine during its starting. Vibroengineering Procedia 2015, 6, 180–184. [Google Scholar]
  60. Szpica, D.; Czaban, J. Investigating of the combustion process in a diesel engine fueled with conventional and alternative fuels. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Scientific Conference, Transport Means 2019, Palanga, Lithuania, 2–4 October 2019; pp. 176–181. [Google Scholar]
  61. Balyts’kyi, O.I.; Abramek, K.F. Diagnostic parameter of wear of a piston-bush-cylinder system. Mater. Sci. 2013, 49, 234–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Droździel, P. Cylinder liner wear during starting of an internal combustion engine. J. Frict. Wear 2001, 22, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  63. Czech, P.; Madej, H. Application of cepstrum and spectrum histograms of vibration engine body for setting up the clearance model of the piston-cylinder assembly for rbf neutral classifier. Eksploat. Niezawodn. Maint. Reliab. 2011, 52, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kowalski, S.; Cieślikowski, B.; Barta, D.; Dižo, J.; Dittrich, A. Analysis of the Operational Wear of the Combustion Engine Piston Pin. Lubricants 2023, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Siemiątkowski, Z.; Szumiata, T.; Gzik-Szumiata, M.; Martynowski, R.; Rucki, M. Application of the microscopic and Mössbauer studies to the analysis of a marine diesel engine crankshaft. J. Mar. Eng. Technol. 2018, 17, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jermak, C.J.; Dereżyński, J.; Rucki, M. Measurement system for assesment of motor cylinder tolerances and roundness. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 2018, 25, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhao, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, D.; Shen, B.; Li, Q. Measurement Uncertainty Analysis of the Stitching Linear-Scan Method for the Measurable Dimension of Small Cylinders. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Abramek, K.F. Phenomenon of load losses at the engine start-up stage. Teka Kom. Motoryz. Energetyki Rol. 2008, 8a, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  69. Andrych-Zalewska, M.; Chlopek, Z.; Merkisz, J.; Pielecha, J. Impact of the Internal Combustion Engine Thermal State during Start-Up on the Exhaust Emissions in the Homologation Test. Energies 2023, 16, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Van, T.C.; Zare, A.; Jafari, M.; Bodisco, T.A.; Surawski, N.; Verma, P.; Suara, K.; Ristovski, Z.; Rainey, T.; Stevanovic, S.; et al. Effect of cold start on engine performance and emissions from diesel engines using IMO-Compliant distillate fuels. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 255, 113260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Deng, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhao, X.; Jiaqiang, E.; Chen, J. Effects of cold start control strategy on cold start performance of the diesel engine based on a comprehensive preheat diesel engine model. Appl. Energy 2018, 210, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. García-Oliver, J.; Pastor, J.; Ramírez-Hernández, J. Ignition and combustion development for high speed direct injection diesel engines under low temperature cold start conditions. Fuel 2011, 90, 1556–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Roberts, A.; Brooks, R.; Shipway, P. Internal combustion engine cold-start efficiency: A review of the problem, causes and potential solutions. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 82, 327–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jaworski, A.; Kuszewski, H.; Ustrzycki, A.; Balawender, K.; Lejda, K.; Woś, P. Analysis of the repeatability of the exhaust pollutants emission research results for cold and hot starts under controlled driving cycle conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 17862–17877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lodi, F.; Zare, A.; Arora, P.; Stevanovic, S.; Jafari, M.; Ristovski, Z.; Brown, R.J.; Bodisco, T. Engine Performance and Emissions Analysis in a Cold, Intermediate and Hot Start Diesel Engine. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mitchell, B.J.; Zare, A.; Bodisco, T.A.; Nabi, N.; Hossain, F.M.; Ristovski, Z.D.; Brown, R.J. Engine blow-by with oxygenated fuels: A comparative study into cold and hot start operation. Energy 2017, 140, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zare, A.; Bodisco, T.A.; Nabi, M.N.; Hossain, F.M.; Ristovski, Z.D.; Brown, R.J. A comparative investigation into cold-start and hot-start operation of diesel engine performance with oxygenated fuels during transient and steady-state operation. Fuel 2018, 228, 390–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Caban, J. Influence of Fuel Injection Parameters on the Course of the Diesel Engine Starting Process. Ph.D. Thesis, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland, 2018; p. 165. (In Polish). [Google Scholar]
  79. Droździel, P. The influence of the vehicle work organization conditions on the engine start-up parameters. Eksploat. Niezawodn. Maint. Reliab. 2008, 37, 72–74. [Google Scholar]
  80. Drozdziel, P. The Influence of Vehicle Maintenance Conditions on Chosen Electric Parameters of Starter During Combustion Engine Start-Up. Commun. Sci. Lett. Univ. Zilina 2006, 8, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Desantes, J.; García-Oliver, J.; Pastor, J.; Ramírez-Hernández, J. Influence of nozzle geometry on ignition and combustion for high-speed direct injection diesel engines under cold start conditions. Fuel 2011, 90, 3359–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Payri, F.; Broatch, A.; Salavert, J.; Martín, J. Investigation of Diesel combustion using multiple injection strategies for idling after cold start of passenger-car engines. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2010, 34, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dziubiński, M.; Litak, G.; Drozd, A.; Szydło, K.; Longwic, R.; Wolszczak, P. Using the Hall Effect for Monitoring the Starter Condition in Motor Vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dziubiński, M.; Siemionek, E.; Plich, M.; Drozd, A.; Toborek, K. Simulation of Automotive Starter Faults. J. Konbin 2017, 44, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Plizga, K. Metody diagnozowania rozruszników samochodowych. Motrol. Motoryz. Energetyka Rol. 2008, 10, 102–109. [Google Scholar]
  86. Bohdanowicz, Z.; Kowalski, J.; Biele, C. Intentions to Charge Electric Vehicles Using Vehicle-to-Grid Technology among People with Different Motivations to Save Energy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. König, A.; Mayer, S.; Nicoletti, L.; Tumphart, S.; Lienkamp, M. The Impact of HVAC on the Development of Autonomous and Electric Vehicle Concepts. Energies 2022, 15, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Skuza, A.; Jurecki, R.; Szumska, E. Influence of Traffic Conditions on the Energy Consumption of an Electric Vehicle. Commun. Sci. Lett. Univ. Zilina 2023, 25, B22–B33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Stoma, M.; Dudziak, A. Future Challenges of the Electric Vehicle Market Perceived by Individual Drivers from Eastern Poland. Energies 2023, 16, 7212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Turoń, K.; Kubik, A.; Folęga, P.; Chen, F. Perception of Shared Electric Scooters: A Case Study from Poland. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Burdzik, R.; Konieczny, Ł.; Jaworski, R.; Laskowski, D.; Polak, R. Comparison of Energy Consumption of Short and Long City Buses in Terms of Assessing the Needs for e-Mobility. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2020, 1032, 74–83. [Google Scholar]
  92. Čulík, K.; Hrudkay, K.; Štefancová, V. Vplyv teploty prostredia na spotrebu elektrických autobusov. Perner’s Contacts 2021, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Almohaimeed, S.A. Electric Vehicle Deployment and Integration in the Saudi Electric Power System. World Electr. Veh. J. 2022, 13, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Čulík, K.; Hrudkay, K.; Štefancová, V. Possibilities of Legislative and Economic Support for Electromobility in Slovakia. Lect. Notes Intell. Transp. Infrastruct. 2023, Part F1379, 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  95. Balitskii, A.I.; Abramek, K.F.; Osipowicz, T.K.; Eliasz, J.J.; Balitska, V.O.; Kochmański, P.; Prajwowski, K.; Mozga, Ł.S. Hydrogen-Containing “Green” Fuels Influence on the Thermal Protection and Formation of Wear Processes Components in Compression-Ignition Engines Modern Injection System. Energies 2023, 16, 3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Capurso, T.; Stefanizzi, M.; Torresi, M.; Camporeale, S. Perspective of the role of hydrogen in the 21st century energy transition. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 251, 114898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ciupek, B.J.; Brodzik, Ł.; Semkło, Ł.; Prokopowicz, W.; Sielicki, P.W. Analysis of the Environmental Parameters of the GTM 400 Turbojet Engine During the Co-Combustion of JET A-1 Jet Oil with Hydrogen. J. Ecol. Eng. 2024, 25, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Małek, A.; Karowiec, R.; Jóżwik, K. A review of technologies in the area of production, storage and use of hydrogen in the automotive industry. Arch. Automot. Eng. Arch. Mot. 2023, 102, 41–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Okafor, E.C.; Kurata, O.; Yamashita, H.; Inoue, T.; Tsujimura, T.; Iki, N.; Hayakawa, A.; Ito, S.; Uchida, M.; Kobayashi, H. Liquid ammonia spray combustion in two-stage micro gas turbine combustors at 0.25 MPa; Relevance of combustion enhancement to flame stability and NOx control. Appl. Energy Combust. Sci. 2021, 7, 100038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tornatore, C.; Marchitto, L.; Sabia, P.; De Joannon, M. Ammonia as Green Fuel in Internal Combustion Engines: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives. Front. Mech. Eng. 2022, 8, 944201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Samociuk, W.; Krzysiak, Z.; Szmigielski, M.; Zarajczyk, J.; Stropek, Z.; Gołacki, K.; Bartnik, G.; Skic, A.; Nieoczym, A. Modernization of the control system to reduce a risk of severe accidents during non-pressurized ammonia storage. Przem. Chem. 2016, 95, 1032–1035. [Google Scholar]
  102. Warguła, L.; Waluś, K.J.; Krawiec, P. Small engines spark ignited (SI) for non-road mobile machinery-Review. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Scientific Conference Transport Means 2018, Trakai, Lithuania, 3–5 October 2018; pp. 585–591. [Google Scholar]
  103. Work Shop Manual RY125 Series Engines, 1st ed.; Lombardini: Reggio Emilia, Italy, 2004; p. 1-5302-633.
  104. Reiter, M.S.; Kockelman, K.M. The problem of cold starts: A closer look at mobile source emissions levels. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2016, 43, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. BN-84/1301-08; Silniki o Zapłonie Samoczynnym. Wtryskiwacze. Wymagania i Badania. [Diesel Engines. Injectors. Requirements and Tests]. Wydawnictwa Normalizacyjne: Warszawa, Poland, 1982. (In Polish)
  106. Kurtyka, K.; Pielecha, J. Cold start emissions from a gasoline engine in RDE tests at different ambient temperatures. Combust. Engines 2020, 181, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Broatch, A.; Ruiz, S.; Margot, X.; Gil, A. Methodology to estimate the threshold in-cylinder temperature for self-ignition of fuel during cold start of Diesel engines. Energy 2010, 35, 2251–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pszczółkowski, J.P. The model for cylinder charge parameters during engine starting. Combust. Engines 2021, 188, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Czech, P. Determination of the course of pressure in an internal combustion engine cylinder with the use of vibration effects and radial basis function–Preliminary research. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2012, 329, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
  110. Coronado, M.; Kadoch, B.; Contreras, J.; Kristjanpoller, F. Reliability and availability modelling of a retrofitted Diesel-based cogeneration system for heat and hot water demand of an isolated Antarctic base. Eksploat. Niezawodn. Maint. Reliab. 2023, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. View of the research stand: 1—control panel, 2—research engine, 3—exhaust gas discharge system, 4—starting battery, 5—connection of measurement signals [78].
Figure 1. View of the research stand: 1—control panel, 2—research engine, 3—exhaust gas discharge system, 4—starting battery, 5—connection of measurement signals [78].
Energies 17 02155 g001
Figure 2. Chart describing the recorded parameters of the start-up process.
Figure 2. Chart describing the recorded parameters of the start-up process.
Energies 17 02155 g002
Figure 3. Values of the maximum current consumed by the starter for two measurement series.
Figure 3. Values of the maximum current consumed by the starter for two measurement series.
Energies 17 02155 g003
Figure 4. Minimum voltage at the battery terminals at start-up for two measurement series.
Figure 4. Minimum voltage at the battery terminals at start-up for two measurement series.
Energies 17 02155 g004
Figure 5. Maximum instantaneous starting power for two measurement series.
Figure 5. Maximum instantaneous starting power for two measurement series.
Energies 17 02155 g005
Figure 6. Average starting power Pmed for two measurement series.
Figure 6. Average starting power Pmed for two measurement series.
Energies 17 02155 g006
Figure 7. Starter operating time for two measurement series.
Figure 7. Starter operating time for two measurement series.
Energies 17 02155 g007
Table 1. Ruggerini RY125 series engine technical specification [103].
Table 1. Ruggerini RY125 series engine technical specification [103].
ParameterType/Value
Type of coolingAir
Displacement505 cm3
Power8.8 kW at 3600 rpm
Maximum torque31 Nm at 2000 rpm
Number of valves2
Compression ratio20:1
Cylinder diameter87 mm
Piston stroke85 mm
Number of injector holes5
Starter voltage12 V (Bosch 0 001 107 090)
Rated power of starter1.1 kW
Maximum rotational speed300 rpm
Direction of rotationRight
Number of pinion teeth11
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caban, J.; Seńko, J.; Ignaciuk, P. Laboratory Tests of Electrical Parameters of the Start-Up Process of Single-Cylinder Diesel Engines. Energies 2024, 17, 2155. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17092155

AMA Style

Caban J, Seńko J, Ignaciuk P. Laboratory Tests of Electrical Parameters of the Start-Up Process of Single-Cylinder Diesel Engines. Energies. 2024; 17(9):2155. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17092155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caban, Jacek, Jarosław Seńko, and Piotr Ignaciuk. 2024. "Laboratory Tests of Electrical Parameters of the Start-Up Process of Single-Cylinder Diesel Engines" Energies 17, no. 9: 2155. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17092155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop