Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Modeling and Parameter Identification
3.1. Equivalent Modeling of Lithium Drone Batteries
3.2. Parameter Identification and Simulation Verification of UAV Lithium Battery
- (1)
- Under the set temperature conditions, charge the battery with a constant current and voltage at a charging current of 0.5 C, with a charging cut-off current of 0.01 C, at which time the SOC is 100%, and leave it for 1 h.
- (2)
- Discharge 5% of the battery at a discharge current of 1 C and leave it for 1 h.
- (3)
- Discharge the battery with a 3 C pulse current for 10 s and leave it for 40 s; charge it for 10 s and leave it for 40 s (to complete one HPPC experiment).
- (4)
- Perform cyclic experiments on steps (2)–(3) until the SOC of the battery = 0%.
4. SOC Estimation Model Establishment
5. Device Development and Performance Verification
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xie, Q. Historical Status and Development Prospects of UAVs. Oper. Manag. 2016, 100–101. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, W. UAV + industry application, a promising future. Bus. Sch. 2018, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, C.G.; Yin, H.J. Analysis of the Working Relationship between Lithium Battery and Charger Battery Management System. Southwest Automotive Information: First Half of 2011.0. Available online: https://www.southwestautomotiveprofessionals.org/ (accessed on 26 November 2023).
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.J.; Wu, T.Z. UAV SOC estimation analysis based on improved EKF. Power Technol. 2019, 43, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Wang, S.L.; Chen, L. SOC estimation of lithium battery packs for small unmanned aerial vehicles based on extended Kalman filter. Manuf. Autom. 2018, 40, 94–97. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, W.H.; Wang, S.L.; Wang, C.M. Intelligent calculation of circuit equivalence and state of charge of UAV lithium battery. Autom. Instrum. 2020, 41, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.J. Study on Correlation of Discharge Curve Fitting Coefficients and Residual Capacity of Different Capacity Lithium Batteries; Northeast Petroleum University: Daqing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Q.Q.; Wan, C.J.; Li, J.F. An open circuit voltage model fusion method for state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries. Energies 2021, 14, 1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somakettarin, N.; Funaki, T. Study on factors for accurate open circuit voltage characterizations in Mn-type Li-ion batteries. Batteries 2017, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Lu, L.G.; Ouyang, M.G. Comparison of methods to improve the accuracy of SOC estimation by ampere-hour integration method. J. Tsinghua Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2010, 50. 1293–1296+1301. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M.Y.; Fan, X.B. Design of battery management system based on improved ampere-hour integration method. Int. J. Electr. Hybrid Veh. 2022, 14, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- How, D.N.; Hannan, M.A.; Lipu, M.H.; Ker, P.J. State of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries using model-based and data-driven methods: A review. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 136116–136136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attanayaka, S.; Karunadasa, J.P.; Hemapala, K.T.M.U. Estimation of state of charge for lithium-ion batteries A Review. AIMS Energy 2019, 7, 186–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.G.; Li, Y.T.; Sun, Y.Y. State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on an adaptive iterative extended Kalman filter. J. Energy Storage 2021, 39, 102593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hametner, C.; Jakubek, S.; Prochazka, W. Data-driven design of a cascaded observer for battery state of health estimation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 6258–6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, R.; Sun, F.C.; He, H.W. Data-driven State-of-Charge estimator for electric vehicles battery using robust extended Kalman filter. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2014, 15, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, A.; Shah, K.; Shah, C. State of charge, remaining useful life and knee point estimation based on artificial intelligence and Machine learning in lithium-ion EV batteries: A comprehensive review. Renew. Energy Focus 2022, 42, 146–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kou, F.R.; Luo, X.; Men, H. SOC estimation of lithium battery based on feature optimization and improved extreme learning machine. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2023, 12, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar]
- Li, D.; Deng, J.J.; Zhang, Z.S. Review on safety warning strategy of electric vehicle power battery. Automot. Eng. 2023, 45, 1392–1407. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, B.R.; Du, J.H.; Ye, X.H. A review of model-based SOC estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2023, 12, 1995–2010. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.T.; Qiu, B.; Chen, Q.S. Comparison of current input electric vehicle battery equivalent circuit models. J. Mech. Eng. 2005, 41, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nejad, S.; Gladwin, D.T.; Stone, D.A. A systematic review of lumped-parameter equivalent circuit models for real-time estimation of lithium-ion battery states. J. Power Sources 2016, 316, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramsey, D.; German, R.; Bouscayrol, A. Comparison of equivalent circuit battery models for energetic studies on electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Gijon, Spain, 18 November–16 December 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Hidalgo-leon, R.; Urquizo, J.; Jacome-ruiz, P. Modeling battery under discharge using improved thevenin-shepherd electrical battery model. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Chicago, IL, USA, 27–30 August 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, J.; Hua, Y.H.; Liu, K. Research on a high-precision modeling scheme for lithium-ion batteries. Proc. CSEE 2019, 39, 6394–6403. [Google Scholar]
- Milishchuk, R.; Bogodorova, T. Thevenin-based battery model with ageing effects in modelica. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 21st Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), Palermo, Italy, 14–16 June 2022; pp. 243–248. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, Y.J.; Qiu, S.L.; Li, G. Simulation of second-order RC equivalent circuit model of lithium battery based on variable resistance and capacitance. J. Cent. South Univ. 2020, 27, 2606–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, X.; Zheng, Y.J.; Sun, T. A comparative study of different equivalent circuit models for estimating state-of-charge of lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 259, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madani, S.S.; Schaltz, E.; Kær, S.K. A review of different electric equivalent circuit models and parameter identification methods of lithium-ion batteries. ECS Trans. 2018, 87, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, X.W.; Guo, Y.W.; Cui, Y. Electric vehicle battery SOC estimation based on GNL model adaptive Kalman filter. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1087, 052027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, G.; Jin, T. Health status assessment of lithium batteries based on multi-scale data fusion. J. Jiangsu Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2023, 44, 524–529. [Google Scholar]
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Nominal capacity | 1000 mAh |
Nominal voltage | 3.7 V |
Charge cut-off voltage | 4.2 V |
Discharge cut-off voltage | 2.75 V |
Standard charging | 0.5 C |
SOC (%) | (Ω) | (Ω) | (F) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.303 | 0.067 | 150.376 |
5 | 0.298 | 0.043 | 235.110 |
10 | 0.296 | 0.039 | 255.537 |
15 | 0.286 | 0.050 | 202.020 |
20 | 0.297 | 0.036 | 279.851 |
25 | 0.285 | 0.050 | 201.613 |
30 | 0.295 | 0.032 | 309.598 |
35 | 0.289 | 0.043 | 232.378 |
40 | 0.298 | 0.032 | 310.559 |
45 | 0.301 | 0.029 | 347.625 |
50 | 0.294 | 0.036 | 277.008 |
55 | 0.294 | 0.031 | 322.234 |
60 | 0.290 | 0.035 | 288.184 |
65 | 0.296 | 0.034 | 295.567 |
70 | 0.290 | 0.038 | 261.552 |
75 | 0.296 | 0.036 | 280.899 |
80 | 0.287 | 0.046 | 217.077 |
85 | 0.297 | 0.040 | 252.738 |
90 | 0.289 | 0.042 | 239.044 |
95 | 0.290 | 0.042 | 236.967 |
n | an | bn | cn |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 8.719 | 4.555 | 0.7213 |
2 | 7.942 | 7.942 | |
3 | −0.1139 | 4.126 | 0.1168 |
4 | 9.001 | −9.276 | 10 |
5 | 0.1401 | 3.839 | 0.08771 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dou, Z.; Li, J.; Yan, H.; Zhang, C.; Liu, F. Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery. Energies 2024, 17, 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040803
Dou Z, Li J, Yan H, Zhang C, Liu F. Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery. Energies. 2024; 17(4):803. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040803
Chicago/Turabian StyleDou, Zhaoliang, Jiaxin Li, Hongjuan Yan, Chunlin Zhang, and Fengbin Liu. 2024. "Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery" Energies 17, no. 4: 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040803
APA StyleDou, Z., Li, J., Yan, H., Zhang, C., & Liu, F. (2024). Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery. Energies, 17(4), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040803