Fundamental Barriers to Green Energy Production in Selected EU Countries
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. General Topics Overview
3.1.1. Management, Economic, and Policy Circumstances
Characteristics of the Problem Group/Barriers | Advantages/Opportunities |
---|---|
Economy | |
High costs of waste management | High initial costs, but only in developing countries; in EU countries, there are many programs for financial support of PV |
PV installations of the off-grid type, with their own energy storages, are more expensive and less popular compared to the on-grid type [27] | |
Capital costs of the system, maintenance costs, and energy produced are necessary to calculate the value of economic indicator LCOE (cost of kWh delivered by the energy system) [28] | Regardless of the billing system (net-metering, i.e., cashless or net-billing where prosumer sells and buys electricity from the grid), there is a possibility of building energy storage systems [27] |
Unclear economics and methodologies in countries | |
Market | |
Unfamiliarity of consumers [29] | Increase in urbanization; well-developed countries observe higher investment levels (i.e., China, Japan, and Germany) [30] |
Lack of energy awareness | Population growth |
Unclear market | Increase in energy consumption and production [16,31] EIA foresees a 50% increase in world energy needs by the year 2050 [32] Increase in prosumers sector Conventional technologies based on silicon are more expensive than the new third-generation PV solutions [33] |
3.1.2. Infrastructural and Environmental Circumstances Influencing PV Sector Development
3.2. Situations in Chosen Countries Regarding Photovoltaic System Development with Future Projections
3.2.1. Germany
3.2.2. Poland
3.2.3. Spain
3.2.4. Italy
4. Discussion and Conclusions
- -
- The future of SE utilization looks very promising due to its clean energy usage. There are new challenges that countries should face, as countries are cautious in their approach to nuclear energy due to the increased risk. Not all countries can afford to develop wind power because there are problems with the necessary distances that matter to the environment and people. PV technologies are considered the least negative.
- -
- Concerning EU countries that have installed the most PV capacity in recent years, Germany stands out, with solar power plants built with a total capacity of 7.9 GW. This result is 1.9 GW higher than what was achieved in 2021. Germany is also the leading country in the EU in the field of energy derived from biogas and hydropower.
- -
- Starting from an installed capacity of 68.5 GW at the end of 2022, Germany aims to expand its PV fleet almost fourfold by the end of this decade. Furthermore, new measures outline solar installations averaging 22 GW per year post-2030, aiming to reach about 400 GW by 2040.
- -
- The installed capacity of photovoltaics in Poland amounted to 13,480.8 MW, including 599.8 MW from state-owned PV power plants and 12,881.0 MW from independent private PV power plants.
- -
- According to data from the Energy Market Agency, as of the end of August 2022, Poland had 1,131,973 PV micro-installations under 50 kW. The high popularity of home installations is largely due to very favorable financial conditions for prosumers that were recently in effect. Specifically, the country’s net-metering scheme allowed prosumers with systems up to 10 kW to feed 1 kWh into the grid and receive 0.8 kWh for free.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hosseini, S.E. Transition Away from Fossil Fuels Toward Renewables: Lessons from Russia-Ukraine Crisis. Future Energy 2022, 1, 2–5. Available online: https://fupubco.com/fuen/article/view/8 (accessed on 25 May 2024). [CrossRef]
- IEA. Electricity Analysis and Forecast to 2026. 2024. Available online: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/18f3ed24-4b26-4c83-a3d2-8a1be51c8cc8/Electricity2024-Analysisandforecastto2026.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2024).
- Czekała, W.; Pulka, J.; Jasiński, T.; Szewczyk, P.; Bojarski, W.; Jasiński, J. Waste as substrates for agricultural biogas plants: A case study from Poland. J. Water Land Dev. 2023, 56, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konieczna, A.; Koniuszy, A. Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions in modeled cereal crop production under Polish agricultural conditions: An example spring barley. J. Water Land Dev. 2024, 61, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petryk, A.; Adamik, P. The guarantees of origin as a market-based energy transition mechanism in Poland. J. Water Land Dev. 2023, 58, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maradin, D. Advantages and disadvantages of renewable energy sources utilization. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2021, 11, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellabban, O.; Abu-Rub, H.; Blaabjerg, F. Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 748–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IRENA. Renewable Energy Statistics; International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Shubbak, M.H. Advances in solar photovoltaics: Technology review and patent trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 115, 109383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiśniewski, G. Czy niedoinwestowana sieć elektroenergetyczna ograniczy rozwój fotowoltaiki? Polityka 2022, 10, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
- Nadeem, T.B.; Siddiqui, M.; Khalid, M.; Asif, M. Distributed energy systems: A review of classification, technologies, applications, and policies. Energy Strategy Rev. 2023, 48, 101096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heffron, R.; Halbrügge, S.; Körner, M.-F.; Obeng-Darko, N.A.; Sumarno, T.; Wagner, J.; Weibelzahl, M. Justice in solar energy development. Sol. Energy 2021, 218, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA. World Energy Outlook. 2023. Available online: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/86ede39e-4436-42d7-ba2a-edf61467e070/WorldEnergyOutlook2023.pdf (accessed on 29 May 2024).
- Owusu, P.A.; Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng. 2016, 3, 1167990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kato, K.; Shinoda, T.; Nagao, R.; Akimoto, S.; Suzuki, T.; Dohmae, N.; Chen, M.; Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Shen, J.R.; Akita, F.; et al. Structural basis for the adaptation and function of chlorophyll f in photosystem I. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Włodarczyk, R. Analysis of the Photovoltaic Waste-Recycling Process in Polish Conditions—A Short Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wajda, A.; Jaworski, T. Zagospodarowanie odpadowych paneli fotowoltaicznych. Perspektywy i wyzwania. Nowa Energ. 2022, 3, 49–52. [Google Scholar]
- Ovaitt, S.; Mirletz, H.; Seetharaman, S.; Barnes, T. PV in the circular economy, a dynamic framework analyzing technology evolution and reliability impacts. iScience 2022, 25, 103488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Formolli, M.; Lobaccaro, G.; Kanters, J. Solar Energy in the Nordic Built Environment: Challenges, Opportunities and Barriers. Energies 2021, 14, 8410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asif, M. Role of Energy Conservation and Management in the 4D Sustainable Energy Transition. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, S.; Yadav, R. Future of photovoltaic technologies: A comprehensive review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brailovsky, P.; Reich, J.; Subasi, D.; Fischer, M.; Dannenberg, T.; Held, M.; Briem, A.-K.; Rentsch, J.; Preu, R.; Geißen, S.-U.; et al. Circular water strategies in solar cells manufacturing. Sol. Energy 2024, 273, 112536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNECE United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 21st Conference of the Parties. Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement (accessed on 25 May 2024).
- WEEE Directive, Directive 2012/19/EU of The European Parliament and of The Council of 4 July 2012 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02012L0019-20180704 (accessed on 24 April 2024).
- da Silva Pereira, P.; Dantas, G.; Pereira, G.I.; Câmara, L.; de Castro, N.J. Photovoltaic distributed generation—An international review on diffusion, support policics, and electricity sector regulatory adaptation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 103, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorjian, S.; Zadeha, B.N.; Eltropb, L.; Shamshiric, R.R.; Amanloua, Y. Solar photovoltaic power generation in Iran: Development, policies, and barriers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 106, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tauron 2024. Available online: https://lepiej.tauron.pl/zielona-energia/qa-fotowoltaika-rozliczenie/ (accessed on 19 April 2024).
- Esparza, I.; Olábarri Candela, Á.; Huang, L.; Yang, Y.; Budiono, C.; Riyadi, S.; Hetharia, W.; Hantoro, R.; Setyawan, D.; Utama, I.K.A.P.; et al. Floating PV Systems as an Alternative Power Source: Case Study on Three Representative Islands of Indonesia. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roddis, P.; Ziv, G.; Dallimer, M.; Carver, S.; Norman, P. The role of community acceptance in planning outcomes for onshore wind and solar farms: An energy justice analysis. App. Energy 2018, 226, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, D.; Gao, W.; Qian, F.; Gu, Q.; Ren, J. Development of solar photovoltaic industry and market in China, Germany, Japan and the United States of America using incentive policies. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2021, 39, 1429–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EMA Energy Market Agency. Power Generation Structure in 2020 (in %). 2020. Available online: https://www.are.waw.pl (accessed on 25 May 2024).
- EIA, U.S. Energy Information Administration. Available online: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/ (accessed on 29 May 2024).
- Rahman, A.U.; El Astal-Quirós, A.; Susanna, G.; Javanbakht, H.; Calabrò, E.; Polino, G.; Paci, B.; Generosi, A.; Righi Riva, F.; Brunetti, F.; et al. Scaling-Up of Solution-Processable Tungsten Trioxide (WO3) Nanoparticles as a Hole Transport Layer in Inverted Organic Photovoltaics. Energies 2024, 17, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huda, A.S.N.; Živanović, R. Large-scale integration of distributed generation into distribution networks: Study objectives, review of models and computational tools. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 974–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elminshawy, N.A.S.; Osama, A.; Naeim, N.; Elbaksawi, O.; Tina, G.M. Thermal regulation of partially floating photovoltaics for enhanced electricity production: A modeling and experimental analysis. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 53, 102582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shioki, T.; Tsuji, R.; Oishi, K.; Fukumuro, N.; Ito, S. Designed Mesoporous Architecture by 10–100 nm TiO2 as Electron Transport Materials in Carbon-Based Multiporous-Layered-Electrode Perovskite Solar Cells. Photonics 2024, 11, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lameirinhas, M.R.A.; Torres, J.P.N.; de Melo Cunha, J.P. A Photovoltaic Technology Review: History, Fundamentals and Applications. Energies 2022, 15, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziemińska-Stolarska, A.; Pietrzak, M.; Zbiciński, I. Application of LCA to Determine Environmental Impact of Concentrated Photovoltaic Solar Panels—State-of-the-Art. Energies 2021, 14, 3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, S.; Sarvaiya, J.N.; Seshadri, B. Temperature Dependent Photovoltaic (PV) Efficiency and Its Effect on PV Production in the World—A Review. Energy Procedia 2013, 33, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiang, P.F.; Han, S.; Claire, M.J.; Maurice, N.J.; Vakili, M.; Giwa, A.S. Sustainable Treatment of Spent Photovoltaic Solar Panels Using Plasma Pyrolysis Technology and Its Economic Significance. Clean Technol. 2024, 6, 432–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumder, A.; Kumar, A.; Innamorati, R.; Mastino, C.C.; Cappellini, G.; Baccoli, R.; Gatto, G. Cooling Methods for Standard and Floating PV Panels. Energies 2023, 16, 7939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, D.; Wang, Z.; Gong, Y.; Gao, W.; Liu, Y.; An, J.; Li, M. The Mechanism of the Semi-Transparent Coverings Affecting the Power Generation Capacity of the Photovoltaic Module and Array. Energies 2024, 17, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yenneti, K.; Day, R.; Golubchikov, O. Spatial justice and the land politics of renewables: Dispossessing vulnerable communities through solar energy mega-projects. Geoforum 2016, 76, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poruschi, L.; Ambrey, C.L. Energy justice, the built environment, and solar photovoltaic (PV) energy transitions in urban Australia: A dynamic panel data analysis. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019, 48, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van de Ven, D.J.; Capellan-Peréz, I.; Arto, I.; Cazcarro, I.; de Castro, C.; Patel, P.; Gonzalez-Eguino, M. The Potential Land Requirements and Related Land Use Change Emissions of Solar Energy. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lobaccaro, G.; Lisowska, M.M.; Saretta, E.; Bonomo, P.; Frontini, F. A Methodological Analysis Approach to Assess Solar Energy Potential at the Neighborhood Scale. Energies 2019, 12, 3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samatar, A.M.; Mekhilef, S.; Mokhlis, H.; Kermadi, M.; Diblawe, A.M.; Stojcevski, A.; Seyedmahmoudian, M. The utilization and potential of solar energy in Somalia: Current state and prospects. Energy Strategy Rev. 2023, 48, 101108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garrod, A.; Hussain, S.N.; Ghosh, A.; Nahata, S.; Wynne, C.; Paver, S. An assessment of floating photovoltaic systems and energy storage methods: A comprehensive review. Res. Engin. 2024, 21, 101940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Chou, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, L. Dual-layer optimization design method for collaborative benefits of renewable energy systems in building clusters: Case study of campus buildings. Energy Build. 2024, 303, 113802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marucci, A.; Zambon, I.; Colantoni, A.; Monarca, D. A combination of agricultural and energy purposes: Evaluation of a prototype of photovoltaic greenhouse tunnel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1178–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukuda, K.; Yu, K.; Someya, T. The future of flexible organic solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zisis, C.; Pechlivani, E.M.; Tsimikli, S.; Mekeridis, E.; Laskarakis, A.; Logothetidis, S. Organic Photovoltaics on Greenhouse Rooftops: Effects on Plant Growth. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 19, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olaleru, S.A.; Kirui, J.K.; Wamwangi, D.; Roro, K.T.; Mwakikunga, B. Perovskite solar cells: The new epoch in photovoltaics. Sol. Energy 2020, 196, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolara, A.; di Fazio, G.; Leva, S.; Manzolini, G.; Simonetti, R.; Terenzi, A. Outdoor Assessment and Performance Evaluation of OPV Modules. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2021, 11, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komoto, K.; Lee, J.S.; Zhang, J.; Ravikumar, D.; Sinha, P.; Wade, A.; Heath, G.A. End-of-Life Management of Photovoltaic Panels: Trends in PV Module Recycling Technologies; No. NREL/TP-6A20-73847; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2018.
- Tammaro, M.; Salluzzo, A.; Rimauro, J.; Schiavo, S.; Manzo, S. Experimental investigation to evaluate the potential environmental hazards of photovoltaic panels. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 306, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Danz, P.; Aryan, V.; Möhle, E.; Nowara, N. Experimental Study on Fluorine Release from Photovoltaic Backsheet Materials Containing PVF and PVDF during Pyrolysis and Incineration in a Technical Lab-Scale Reactor at Various Temperatures. Toxics 2019, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panthi, G.; Bajagain, R.; An, Y.-J.; Jeong, S.-W. Leaching potential of chemical species from real perovskite and silicon solar cells. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 149, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tawalbeh, M.; Al-Othman, A.; Kafiah, F.; Abdelsalam, E.; Almomani, F.; Alkasrawi, M. Environmental impacts of solar photovoltaic systems: A critical review of recent progress and future outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 143528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petroli, P.A.; Camargo, P.S.S.; de Souza, R.A.; Veit, H.M. Assessment of toxicity tests for photovoltaic panels: A review. Curr. Opin. Green Sust. Chem. 2024, 47, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Photovoltaics Report. Available online: https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/de/documents/publications/studies/Photovoltaics-Report.pdf (accessed on 17 May 2024).
- Bielewski, M.; Pfrang, A.; Bobba, S.; Kronberga, A.; Georgakaki, A.; Letout, S.; Kuokkanen, A.; Mountraki, A.; Ince, E.; Shtjefni, D.; et al. Clean Energy Technology Observatory: Batteries for Energy Storage in the European Union—2022 Status Report on Technology Development, Trends, Value Chains and Markets; EUR 31220 EN; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2022; JRC130724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von der Leyen, U. A Union that Strives for More. Political Guidelines for the Next Term of the European Commission (2019–2024), Brussels, Belgium. 2020. Available online: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-04/political-guidelines-next-commission_en_0.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2024).
- EMBER, European Electricity Review. Available online: https://ember-climate.org/app/uploads/2024/02/European-Electricity-Review-2024.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2024).
- ENERAD. Available online: https://enerad.pl/aktualnosci/rynek-fotowoltaiki-w-polsce-2023-raport/ (accessed on 14 May 2024).
- Solar Power Europe, EU Market Outlook for Solar Power 2023–2027. Available online: https://www.solarpowereurope.org/insights/outlooks/eu-market-outlook-for-solar-power-2023-2027/detail (accessed on 24 April 2024).
- Polverini, D.; Espinosa, N.; Eynard, U.; Leccisi, E.; Ardente, F.; Mathieux, F. Assessing the carbon footprint of photovoltaic modules through the EU Ecodesign Directive. Sol. Energy 2023, 257, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maier, R.; Lütz, L.; Risch, S.; Kullmann, F.; Weinand, J.; Stolten, D. Potential of floating, parking, and agri photovoltaics in Germany. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 200, 114500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szara, K. Behavioral aspects of investments in renewable energy sources on the example of Podkarpackie province. Econ. Reg. Stud. 2024, 17, 164–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulkowski, S.; Krawczak, E. Long-Term Energy Yield Analysis of the Rooftop PV System in Climate Conditions of Poland. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- REGLOBAL. Available online: https://reglobal.org/outlook-for-solar-power-development-in-spain-france-and-greece/ (accessed on 25 May 2024).
- Hanrieder, N.; Kujawa, A.; Bendejacq Seychelles, A.; Blanco, M.; Carballo, J.; Wilbert, S. Estimation of maximum photovoltaic cover ratios in greenhouses based on global irradiance data. Appl. Energy 2024, 365, 123232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Energy Post. Available online: https://energypost.eu/how-will-italy-ramp-up-its-grid-storage-to-meet-its-2030-goals/ (accessed on 28 May 2024).
- Energy from Renewable Sources in Italy—Statistical Report 2020, GSE. Available online: https://www.gse.it/dati-e-scenari/statistiche (accessed on 25 May 2024).
- Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/825951/total-capacity-of-installations-fueled-by-res-in-italy-2008-2017/. (accessed on 25 May 2024).
- Haegel, N.M.; Verlinden, P.; Victoria, M.; Altermatt, P.; Atwater, H.; Barnes, T.; Breyer, C.; Case, C.; de Wolf, S.; Deline, C.; et al. Photovoltaics at multi-terawatt scale: Waiting is not an option. Science 2023, 380, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Journal | IF | Cite Score (Scopus) | |
---|---|---|---|
Cs | Citescore Highest Percentile Cs-hp’23 | ||
Advanced Energy Materials | 24.4 | 41.9 | 98 |
Applied Energy | 10.1 | 21.2 | 99 |
Clean Technologies | 4.0 | 6.1 | 80 |
Cogent Engineering | 2.1 | 4.0 | 70 |
Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry | 9.3 | 16.0 | 97 |
Energies | 3.0 | 6.2 | 85 |
Energy and Buildings | 6.6 | 12.7 | 95 |
Energy Exploration and Exploitation | 1.9 | 5.4 | 85 |
Energy Research and Social Science | 6.9 | 14.0 | 98 |
Energy Strategy Reviews | 7.9 | 12.8 | 85 |
Geoforum | 3.4 | 7.3 | 94 |
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics | 2.5 | 7.0 | 82 |
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (IJEEP) | 0.0 | 3.2 | 75 |
iScience | 4.6 | 7.2 | 90 |
Journal of Hazardous Materials | 12.2 | 25.4 | 99 |
Journal of Water and Land Development | 0.0 | 2.1 | 56 |
Nature Communications | 14.7 | 24.9 | 97 |
Photonics | 2.1 | 2.6 | 43 |
Process Safety and Environmental Protection | 6.9 | 11.4 | 95 |
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | 16.3 | 31.2 | 97 |
Results in Engineering | 6.0 | 5.8 | 82 |
Science | 44.7 | 61.1 | 99 |
Science of the Total Environment | 8.2 | 17.6 | 95 |
Solar Energy | 6.0 | 13.9 | 89 |
Sustainability | 3.3 | 6.8 | 88 |
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments | 7.1 | 12.7 | 92 |
Toxics | 3.9 | 4.5 | 53 |
Conference Proceedings | |||
Energy Procedia (Book Series). PV Asia Pacific Conference 2012 | 772 times cited in all databases | ||
15th International Conferences and Exhibition on Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies (NN) 2019 Materials Today-Proceedings | 43 times cited in all databases | ||
Future Energy | Read counter: 6698; downloads: 176 |
Characteristics of the Problem Group/Barriers | Advantages/Opportunities |
---|---|
Management | |
PV installations in cities on new buildings require planning from early stages (Formolli et al. [19]). | Distributed energy systems (DES) offer several advantages over centralized energy systems [11]. |
Conventional planning of optimal decentralized energy systems (DES) is not as suitable as artificial intelligence techniques [11]. | Sustainable energy transition focuses on 4 dimensions: decarbonization, decreased use, decentralization, and digitalization [20]. |
Generally, around the world, there is a lack of proper waste management policies and programs like decommissioning, even in countries that are the biggest consumers of PV modules [21]. | The usage of LCA helps on all levels of PV system planning [22]. |
Law and governmental policies | |
New legislation sometimes does not lead to an increase in the share of solar energy [12]. | The future of PV was discussed during the Paris COP21 climate change negotiations [23]. |
There are problems with setting up recycling facilities and building a closed solar recycling market. | WEEE Directive, the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive [24], indicates that potentially harmful substances will be contained, rare materials will be recovered, materials with high embodied energy value will be recycled, and recycling processes will consider the quality of recovered material. |
Concerns involve an unclear policy framework and regulations [12] and an urgent need to institutionalize regulations regarding PV waste management. | The policy frameworks show photovoltaic (PV)-based DES (decentralized energy systems) as good alternatives for centralized energy systems [25] |
Characteristics of the Problem Group/Barriers | Advantages/Opportunities |
---|---|
Technological and Technical Factors (Production and Operation) | |
Voltage regulation, power quality problems, malfunction of protection systems, and islanding [34] | Natural cooling in FPV leads to an increase in the efficiency of the modules at about 12% [35] |
Crystalline silicon technologies (c-si) have some issues to be solved in order to increase the energy effectiveness. The most promising technology is HIT (heterojunction with intrinsic thin layer) [9] | Perovskite-based solar cells (PSCs) are the fastest-growing solar technology to date since their inception in 2009 |
Still low effectiveness: from 18% for mono-crystalline silicon cells to 26.1% for perovskite technology [36] and up to 40–41% for three-junction concentrator cell (GaInP/Ga(In)As/Ge) [37] | Perovskite: an opportunity to produce panels with multifaceted applications |
Effectiveness depends on technology used: a multijunction system has 10% higher effectiveness compared to a single-junction construction [33] | Production of transparent panels allows their application on horticultural tunnels |
The higher the concentration of PV, the higher the solar energy efficiency [38] | Fully printable, carbon-based, multiporous-layered-electrode perovskite solar cells (MPLE-PSCs) are easy to fabricate and have excellent durability and high stability over long periods [36] |
Some technologies, like PSCs, are expensive because they require the use of gold or silver for back electrodes and expensive materials for the hole transport layer [36] | Some coverings on the PV modules are semi-transparent |
Problem with temperature increase, which causes early damage [39] | Increasing longevity of panels: 25–30 years is guaranteed by 3rd-generation technologies [40] |
Cooling methods need to be developed, especially when ground-based PV is used [41] | OPVs (organic photovoltaics) can use roll-to-roll manufacturing [9] |
Problems with overshadowing: Fully covered single cells cause power loss of the module, even up to 79% [42] |
Characteristics of the Problem Group/Barriers | Advantages/Opportunities |
---|---|
Infrastructure | |
Locations of solar energy infrastructure should be well planned [43,44,45] | In the majority of cases, no problem with distances or distribution infrastructure |
Creation and usage of maps of the accessibility and potential of building surfaces (roofs and façades) due to overshading [46] | Only in some countries, especially developing countries such as Somalia, is the barrier the lack of infrastructure [47]. This problem does not apply to EU countries. |
For FPV (floating photovoltaic) with BEES (battery energy storage systems), the accessibility of the national and local grids is important; sometimes it is lacking [28,48] | Versatility and ease of installation; some can be very thin for roofs and sidewalls of individual houses, public use buildings, and clusters of buildings [49] |
The connection of new energy sources to the electricity system is limited by the state of the grid infrastructure and the availability of connection capacity | Diversity of usage: office buildings, gas stations, tunnels, and greenhouses type Agro [50] |
Off-grid renewables-based DES (decentralized energy systems) require energy storage systems [11] | Advantages: lifespan of photovoltaic systems: after 25 years, they retain 80% of their original efficiency |
OPVs (organic photovoltaics) [51], semi-transparency [52], low weight, and flexibility in shapes and colors |
Characteristics of the Problem Group/Barriers | Advantages/Opportunities |
---|---|
Environment | |
Crystalline silicon (c-Si) is the most popular PV technology used in the global market [53], and its share is around 90% [40] | Some PV technologies, like organic photovoltaics (OPVs), have a reduced negative impact on the environment in comparison with others [54] |
Attractive support policies can lead to high increases in investing, but can also lead to problems with the recycling and disposal of photovoltaic waste [16] | Recovering process: physical and chemical treatments like separation, shredding, and chemical reactions [37] |
Rare substances and materials with high embodied energy value (e.g., silicon, glass) have high potential for reuse | |
Using floating PV leads to a reduction in water evaporation, while ground-based PV can cause a loss of agricultural land [48] | Possibility to produce very thin panels, i.e., in OPV flexible organic solar cells [33,51], is connected to a lower amount of waste |
Only 10% of PV modules in the world are recycled [16] | |
Wastes occur at all four stages: production, transport, installation, and operation [21] | |
Main reasons for failures (cell degradation, micro-cracks, contact defects, glass breakage, and defective bypass diodes) are connected with changing ambient factors (precipitation, wind) and repeated mechanical and thermal load cycles [21,55] | |
Depending on the technology used for production of PV cells, the solar installation is built from different types of materials and often contains toxic chemicals, heavy metals [56], and rare substances like fluorine [57], which can be release into the environment (cadmium, lead, copper, nickel, zinc) [58,59] | |
PV panels contain heavy metals, and waste disposal is more difficult [60] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wardal, W.J.; Mazur, K.; Barwicki, J.; Tseyko, M. Fundamental Barriers to Green Energy Production in Selected EU Countries. Energies 2024, 17, 3664. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153664
Wardal WJ, Mazur K, Barwicki J, Tseyko M. Fundamental Barriers to Green Energy Production in Selected EU Countries. Energies. 2024; 17(15):3664. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153664
Chicago/Turabian StyleWardal, Witold Jan, Kamila Mazur, Jan Barwicki, and Mikhail Tseyko. 2024. "Fundamental Barriers to Green Energy Production in Selected EU Countries" Energies 17, no. 15: 3664. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153664
APA StyleWardal, W. J., Mazur, K., Barwicki, J., & Tseyko, M. (2024). Fundamental Barriers to Green Energy Production in Selected EU Countries. Energies, 17(15), 3664. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153664